ML18058A523: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML18058A523 | | number = ML18058A523 | ||
| issue date = 03/01/2018 | | issue date = 03/01/2018 | ||
| title = | | title = Summary of February 26, 2018, Meeting with Exelon Generation Company, LLC Regarding Proposed Alternative to the Main Steam Isolation Valve Testing Requirements | ||
| author name = Purnell B | | author name = Purnell B | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20SSS-0001 March 1, 2018 LICENSEE: | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20SSS-0001 March 1, 2018 LICENSEE: EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC FACILITIES: CLINTON POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 1; DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3; JAMES A FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT; LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION; AND QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 | ||
EXELON GENERATION | |||
CLINTON POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 1; DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3; JAMES A FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT; LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION; AND QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
SUMMARY OF FEBRUARY 26, 2018, MEETING WITH EXELON GENERATION | ==SUMMARY== | ||
OF FEBRUARY 26, 2018, MEETING WITH EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC REGARDING PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE TO THE MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE TESTING REQUIREMENTS (EPID L-2017-LLR-0134) | |||
On February 26, 2018, a Category 1 public meeting was held between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and representatives of Exelon Generation | On February 26, 2018, a Category 1 public meeting was held between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and representatives of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee) via teleconference. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss Exelon's November 1, 2017 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) | ||
Accession No. ML 17306AO 14), application for a proposed alternative to a portion of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants (OM Code). The proposed alternative was requested for Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1; Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3; James A FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant; LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2; Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; and Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2. The meeting notice and agenda, dated February 12, 2018, are available in ADAMS at Accession No. ML18043A631. A list of attendees is enclosed. | |||
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss Exelon's November 1, 2017 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 17306AO 14 ), application for a proposed alternative to a portion of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants (OM Code). The proposed alternative was requested for Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1; Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3; James A FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant; LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2; Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; and Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2. The meeting notice and agenda, dated February 12, 2018, are available in ADAMS at Accession No. | |||
A list of attendees is enclosed. | ===Background=== | ||
Background Currently, Exelon performs partial-stroke testing of the main steam isolation valves (MSIVs) quarterly and full-stroke testing of the MS IVs during cold shutdown based on a cold shutdown justification (CSJ). Paragraph ISTC-3521(b) of the ASME OM Code states that if full-stroke exercising of a valve during operation at power is not practicable, it may be limited to partial stroke during operation at power and full-stroke during cold shutdown. | Currently, Exelon performs partial-stroke testing of the main steam isolation valves (MSIVs) quarterly and full-stroke testing of the MS IVs during cold shutdown based on a cold shutdown justification (CSJ). Paragraph ISTC-3521(b) of the ASME OM Code states that if full-stroke exercising of a valve during operation at power is not practicable, it may be limited to partial stroke during operation at power and full-stroke during cold shutdown. Exelon's application states that it will revise its CSJ to eliminate the quarterly partial-stroke testing of MSIVs at power, such that the only exercising of MSIVs will be the full-stroke testing during cold shutdown. Paragraph ISTC-3521(c) of the ASME OM Code states that if exercising of a valve during operation power is not practicable, it may be limited to full-stroke exercising during cold shutdown. | ||
Exelon's application states that it will revise its CSJ to eliminate the quarterly partial-stroke testing of MSIVs at power, such that the only exercising of MSIVs will be the full-stroke testing during cold shutdown. | |||
Paragraph ISTC-3521(c) of the ASME OM Code states that if exercising of a valve during operation power is not practicable, it may be limited to full-stroke exercising during cold shutdown. Exelon also performs a quarterly reactor protection system (RPS) channel functional test (a surveillance requirement) that uses the partial-stroke of the MSIV to generate the MSIV position switch input into the RPS logic. Exelon's application states that it will use the surveillance frequency control program to extend the RPS channel functional test to refueling outage intervals. | Exelon also performs a quarterly reactor protection system (RPS) channel functional test (a surveillance requirement) that uses the partial-stroke of the MSIV to generate the MSIV position switch input into the RPS logic. Exelon's application states that it will use the surveillance frequency control program to extend the RPS channel functional test to refueling outage intervals. In order to accomplish this change, the application stated that the partial-stroking of the MS IVs at power would need to continue for a number of years at longer intervals (i.e., less frequent than the current quarterly testing). | ||
In order to accomplish this change, the application stated that the partial-stroking of the MS IVs at power would need to continue for a number of years at longer intervals (i.e., less frequent than the current quarterly testing). | Discussion Exelon's application indicated that a proposed alternative to the ASME OM Code was needed because continuing to perform periodic partial-stroke MSIV testing at power will contradict a CSJ that exercising at power is not practicable. Exelon also cited a past precedent for this request, which the NRC authorized for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (Peach Bottom), | ||
Discussion Exelon's application indicated that a proposed alternative to the ASME OM Code was needed because continuing to perform periodic partial-stroke MSIV testing at power will contradict a CSJ that exercising at power is not practicable. | Units 2 and 3, by letter dated April 28, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17108A762). | ||
Exelon also cited a past precedent for this request, which the NRC authorized for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (Peach Bottom), | The NRC staff stated that the alternative was not needed, since the ASME OM Code does not prevent the continued exercising of MS IVs at power if a CSJ demonstrates that exercising at power is not practicable. In particular, the staff notes that paragraph ISTC-3521(c) of the ASME OM Code states that exercising "may"-not "shall"-be limited to full-stroke exercising during cold shutdown. Thus, paragraph ISTC-3521(c) does not prevent the partial-stroke testing of the MSIVs at power. The staff notes it has not reviewed Exelon's revised CSJ. | ||
Units 2 and 3, by letter dated April 28, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. | Exelon did not identify anything that was missing in its application that would indicate the need for the proposed alternative. Exelon did express some concern about the past precedent for Peach Bottom. However, the NRC staff noted that it considered the precedent in its review of the current proposed alternatve. The staff stated that the licensee should not be impacted by the previous NRC authorization for Peach Bottom, because implementation of alternatives to the ASME OM Code is optional. | ||
The NRC staff stated that the alternative was not needed, since the ASME OM Code does not prevent the continued exercising of MS IVs at power if a CSJ demonstrates that exercising at power is not practicable. | Exelon stated that it will withdraw its application, and it will include the information discussed at this meeting. After the withdrawal letter is received, the NRC staff will respond with an acknowledgement letter confirming the staff's position. | ||
In particular, the staff notes that paragraph ISTC-3521(c) of the ASME OM Code states that exercising "may"-not "shall"-be limited to full-stroke exercising during cold shutdown. | |||
Thus, paragraph ISTC-3521(c) does not prevent the partial-stroke testing of the MSIVs at power. The staff notes it has not reviewed Exelon's revised CSJ. Exelon did not identify anything that was missing in its application that would indicate the need for the proposed alternative. | Public meeting feedback forms were not received. Please direct any inquiries to me at 301-415-1380, or Blake.Purnell@nrc.gov. | ||
Exelon did express some concern about the past precedent for Peach Bottom. However, the NRC staff noted that it considered the precedent in its review of the current proposed alternatve. | nt- L Blake Purnell, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch Ill Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-461, 50-237, 50-249, 50-333 50-373, 50-374, 50-220, 50-410, 50-219, 50-254, and 50-265 | ||
The staff stated that the licensee should not be impacted by the previous NRC authorization for Peach Bottom, because implementation of alternatives to the ASME OM Code is optional. | |||
Exelon stated that it will withdraw its application, and it will include the information discussed at this meeting. | |||
After the withdrawal letter is received, the NRC staff will respond with an acknowledgement letter confirming the staff's position. Public meeting feedback forms were not received. | |||
Please direct any inquiries to me at 301-415-1380, or Blake.Purnell@nrc.gov. | |||
nt-L Blake Purnell, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch Ill Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-461, 50-237, 50-249, 50-333 50-373, 50-374, 50-220, 50-410, 50-219, 50-254, and 50-265 | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
List of Attendees cc w/encl: Listserv marvlewis@juno.com LIST OF ATTENDEES FEBRUARY 26, 2018, MEETING WITH EXELON GENERATION | List of Attendees cc w/encl: Listserv marvlewis@juno.com | ||
LIST OF ATTENDEES FEBRUARY 26, 2018, MEETING WITH EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE TO THE MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VAL VE TESTING REQUIREMENTS Name Affiliation Blake Purnell NRC David Wrona NRC John Huanq NRC Robert Wolfgang NRC Bhalchandra Vaidya NRC Tom Basso Exelon James Barstow Exelon Mark DiRado Exelon Bill Reynolds Exelon David Helker Exelon Marcellus Ruff Exelon Phil Kehoe Exelon John Pilon Exelon David Neff Exelon Gary Knapp Exelon Mark Budelier Exelon Greg Krueger Exelon/NEI Representative | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
SUMMARY OF FEBRUARY 26, 2018, MEETING WITH EXELON GENERATION | ==SUMMARY== | ||
OF FEBRUARY 26, 2018, MEETING WITH EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC REGARDING PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE TO THE MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE TESTING REQUIREMENTS (EPID L-2017-LLR-0134) DATED MARCH 1, 2018 DISTRIBUTION: | |||
DATED MARCH 1, 2018 DISTRIBUTION: | PUBLIC r/f RidsRgn 1Mail Center Resource RidsRgn3Mai1Center Resource RidsNrrDorlLp11 Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl3 Resource RidsNrrDorlLspb Resource RidsNrrLASRohrer Resource RidsNrrLALRonewicz Resource RidsNrrLAIBetts Resource RidsACRS_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrPMExelon Resource RidsNrrPMClinton Resource RidsNrrPMDresden Resource RidsNrrPMFitzPatrick Resource RidsNrrPMLaSalle Resource RidsNrrPMNineMilePoint Resource RidsNrrPMOysterCreek Resource RidsNrrPMPeachBottom Resource RidsNrrPMQuadCities Resource RidsNrrLASRohrer Resource RidsNrrDeEmib Resource TWertz, NRR JBowen, EDO JHuang, NRR RWolfgang, NRR BVaiyda, NRR ADAMS A ccess1on N OS. M eef mg N 01cef ML18043A631 M eef mg S ummary ML18058A523 OFFICE NRR/DORULPL3/PM NRR/DORULPL3/LA NRR/DORL/LPL3/BC NRR/DORL/LPL3/PM NAME BPurnell SRohrer DWrona BPurnell DATE 3/1/18 2/27/18 3/1/18 3/1/18 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}} | ||
PUBLIC r/f RidsRgn |
Latest revision as of 18:16, 21 October 2019
ML18058A523 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Peach Bottom, Nine Mile Point, Oyster Creek, Byron, Braidwood, Limerick, Ginna, Clinton, Quad Cities, LaSalle, 07000650 |
Issue date: | 03/01/2018 |
From: | Blake Purnell Plant Licensing Branch III |
To: | Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear |
Purnell B, NRR/DORL/LPLIII, 415-1380 | |
References | |
EPID L-2017-LLR-0134 | |
Download: ML18058A523 (5) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20SSS-0001 March 1, 2018 LICENSEE: EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC FACILITIES: CLINTON POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 1; DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3; JAMES A FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT; LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2; OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION; AND QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF FEBRUARY 26, 2018, MEETING WITH EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC REGARDING PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE TO THE MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE TESTING REQUIREMENTS (EPID L-2017-LLR-0134)
On February 26, 2018, a Category 1 public meeting was held between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and representatives of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee) via teleconference. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss Exelon's November 1, 2017 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML 17306AO 14), application for a proposed alternative to a portion of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants (OM Code). The proposed alternative was requested for Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1; Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3; James A FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant; LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2; Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; and Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2. The meeting notice and agenda, dated February 12, 2018, are available in ADAMS at Accession No. ML18043A631. A list of attendees is enclosed.
Background
Currently, Exelon performs partial-stroke testing of the main steam isolation valves (MSIVs) quarterly and full-stroke testing of the MS IVs during cold shutdown based on a cold shutdown justification (CSJ). Paragraph ISTC-3521(b) of the ASME OM Code states that if full-stroke exercising of a valve during operation at power is not practicable, it may be limited to partial stroke during operation at power and full-stroke during cold shutdown. Exelon's application states that it will revise its CSJ to eliminate the quarterly partial-stroke testing of MSIVs at power, such that the only exercising of MSIVs will be the full-stroke testing during cold shutdown. Paragraph ISTC-3521(c) of the ASME OM Code states that if exercising of a valve during operation power is not practicable, it may be limited to full-stroke exercising during cold shutdown.
Exelon also performs a quarterly reactor protection system (RPS) channel functional test (a surveillance requirement) that uses the partial-stroke of the MSIV to generate the MSIV position switch input into the RPS logic. Exelon's application states that it will use the surveillance frequency control program to extend the RPS channel functional test to refueling outage intervals. In order to accomplish this change, the application stated that the partial-stroking of the MS IVs at power would need to continue for a number of years at longer intervals (i.e., less frequent than the current quarterly testing).
Discussion Exelon's application indicated that a proposed alternative to the ASME OM Code was needed because continuing to perform periodic partial-stroke MSIV testing at power will contradict a CSJ that exercising at power is not practicable. Exelon also cited a past precedent for this request, which the NRC authorized for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (Peach Bottom),
Units 2 and 3, by letter dated April 28, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17108A762).
The NRC staff stated that the alternative was not needed, since the ASME OM Code does not prevent the continued exercising of MS IVs at power if a CSJ demonstrates that exercising at power is not practicable. In particular, the staff notes that paragraph ISTC-3521(c) of the ASME OM Code states that exercising "may"-not "shall"-be limited to full-stroke exercising during cold shutdown. Thus, paragraph ISTC-3521(c) does not prevent the partial-stroke testing of the MSIVs at power. The staff notes it has not reviewed Exelon's revised CSJ.
Exelon did not identify anything that was missing in its application that would indicate the need for the proposed alternative. Exelon did express some concern about the past precedent for Peach Bottom. However, the NRC staff noted that it considered the precedent in its review of the current proposed alternatve. The staff stated that the licensee should not be impacted by the previous NRC authorization for Peach Bottom, because implementation of alternatives to the ASME OM Code is optional.
Exelon stated that it will withdraw its application, and it will include the information discussed at this meeting. After the withdrawal letter is received, the NRC staff will respond with an acknowledgement letter confirming the staff's position.
Public meeting feedback forms were not received. Please direct any inquiries to me at 301-415-1380, or Blake.Purnell@nrc.gov.
nt- L Blake Purnell, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch Ill Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-461, 50-237, 50-249, 50-333 50-373, 50-374, 50-220, 50-410, 50-219, 50-254, and 50-265
Enclosure:
List of Attendees cc w/encl: Listserv marvlewis@juno.com
LIST OF ATTENDEES FEBRUARY 26, 2018, MEETING WITH EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE TO THE MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VAL VE TESTING REQUIREMENTS Name Affiliation Blake Purnell NRC David Wrona NRC John Huanq NRC Robert Wolfgang NRC Bhalchandra Vaidya NRC Tom Basso Exelon James Barstow Exelon Mark DiRado Exelon Bill Reynolds Exelon David Helker Exelon Marcellus Ruff Exelon Phil Kehoe Exelon John Pilon Exelon David Neff Exelon Gary Knapp Exelon Mark Budelier Exelon Greg Krueger Exelon/NEI Representative
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF FEBRUARY 26, 2018, MEETING WITH EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC REGARDING PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE TO THE MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE TESTING REQUIREMENTS (EPID L-2017-LLR-0134) DATED MARCH 1, 2018 DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC r/f RidsRgn 1Mail Center Resource RidsRgn3Mai1Center Resource RidsNrrDorlLp11 Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl3 Resource RidsNrrDorlLspb Resource RidsNrrLASRohrer Resource RidsNrrLALRonewicz Resource RidsNrrLAIBetts Resource RidsACRS_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrPMExelon Resource RidsNrrPMClinton Resource RidsNrrPMDresden Resource RidsNrrPMFitzPatrick Resource RidsNrrPMLaSalle Resource RidsNrrPMNineMilePoint Resource RidsNrrPMOysterCreek Resource RidsNrrPMPeachBottom Resource RidsNrrPMQuadCities Resource RidsNrrLASRohrer Resource RidsNrrDeEmib Resource TWertz, NRR JBowen, EDO JHuang, NRR RWolfgang, NRR BVaiyda, NRR ADAMS A ccess1on N OS. M eef mg N 01cef ML18043A631 M eef mg S ummary ML18058A523 OFFICE NRR/DORULPL3/PM NRR/DORULPL3/LA NRR/DORL/LPL3/BC NRR/DORL/LPL3/PM NAME BPurnell SRohrer DWrona BPurnell DATE 3/1/18 2/27/18 3/1/18 3/1/18 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY