ML19270G970: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 30: Line 30:
                                                                                                           . :o
                                                                                                           . :o
::      c P1 Mr. James P. O'Reilly U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
::      c P1 Mr. James P. O'Reilly U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
[[       2)
((       2)
                                                                                                           ~ ;*
                                                                                                           ~ ;*
                                                                                                           ~
                                                                                                           ~

Latest revision as of 12:27, 16 March 2020

Responds to NRC 790411 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-340/79-14 & 50-364/79-06.Corrective Actions:New in-house Procedure Implemented to Control Electrical Prints & Instruction of All Field Supervision
ML19270G970
Person / Time
Site: Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 04/27/1979
From: Clayton F
ALABAMA POWER CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19270G966 List:
References
NUDOCS 7906220247
Download: ML19270G970 (2)


Text

- - --

, . A.aba+a Pom f Co tv>y

@ PJW 189 $**ee!

PC5'(7' Ce Eks 2611

  • B .rf.a* A 3W3 35291 Te-eptcne 205 323 53s t F. L CLAYTON, JR m

sen.a:e %ss,: AlabaniaPower f *e 50.f W9 ef<fT S ca'"

April 27, 1979 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant - Unit 2 NRC Inspection of March 27-29, 1979

)(

.b]

3::

~* Z 33 File: A-35.10.03 Log: 79-108 Ej C)

. :o

c P1 Mr. James P. O'Reilly U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

(( 2)

~ ;*

~

101 Marietta Street NW - Suite 3100 ~

Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Re: RII:PDH 50-364/79-6

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

The inspection report trar.smitted by Mr. Murphy's letter of April 11, 1979, has been reviewed by all concerned parties and we do not consider any of the information contained therein to be proprietary.

We have taken the following action in response to the item noted in the inspection report: .

5. Independent Inspection Efforts - Unit 2 Infraction 364/79-06-01 Improper control of Revised Electrical Drawingg_
1) A. Tha cause of the subject discrepancy was that the drawings were inadvertently left in the electrical penetration room when personnel were dismissed due to cut back.

B. The electrical department made a search of all buildings for void drawings and specifications, in order to meet the practices of controlling the retrieval of void drawings. The requirements of QCP 5.3.2.1, which requires that superseded drawings be stamped " Void" if maintained as a Work Record is being implemented.

2348 277 7906220247 976 50 OFFICIAL copy

NRC Inspection of March 27-29, 1979 April 27, 1979 Page 2

2) A. A new in-house procedure for controlling electrical prints has been completed as of February 2, 1979, and is being implemented as of this date.

B. The Electrical Manager has instructed all field supervision on this subject and has explained the importance of keeping electrical documents under control and updated.

3) Full compliance has been achieved as of April 13, 1979, and electrical documents will be monitored in the future to assure compliance with applicable documentation control procedures.

Very truly you 4, Q@?ptl N'

$ F. L. Clayton, Jr.

O FLC:CBSh cc: Mr. M. D. Hunt 2348 278 9