ML20081A530: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20081A530
| number = ML20081A530
| issue date = 10/25/1983
| issue date = 10/25/1983
| title = Opposes Relicensing of Nuclear Reactor at Ucla
| title = Opposes Relicensing of Nuclear Reactor at UCLA
| author name = Levy D
| author name = Levy D
| author affiliation = AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
| author affiliation = AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED

Revision as of 15:30, 26 September 2022

Opposes Relicensing of Nuclear Reactor at UCLA
ML20081A530
Person / Time
Site: 05000142
Issue date: 10/25/1983
From: Levy D
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To: Frye J
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8310260302
Download: ML20081A530 (1)


Text

.-- - - - . _ . _

I

. audge aohn n. rrye III  !

. notggy[,

USyp Atomic Safety and Licensing Board '

~~ TS Nuclear Regulatory Commission l Washington, D.C. 205S5 113 OCT 25 All:03 -

i 0FFICE 0? $5tgt,;;,,

00CKETING & SEima

" ~ * -

BRANCH SERVED 001 351983 l

Judge aohn rrye, As a UCLA student and a citizen of the West Los Angeles- Santa Monica area, I an deeply opposed to the relicensing of the nuclear reactor on campus.

I have become aware of the many flagrant and reckless safety violations sur-l wunding the reactor and the fact that is is an unneccesary risk. -~

There is clearly no need for a reactor on campus and I believe it would l be in the school's and the public's interest to shut the reactor down permantly.

There are too many safety violations to be listed here. I would hope that you would acquaint yourself with these issues before ruling on ti2e reactor.

I I Please bear all these factors in mind and decline relicensing and, remove l this public safety menace from the public. Thank you.

Sincere 1 yours. ~

/

N / .

3 23rd anta Monica, Ca. gg4g3

~_. _ -

l 8310260302 831025 , ,

PDR ADOCK 05000142 -

H PDR l

.--. - - - _ _