ML20132H105: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:.
DRAFT 1 07/17/84 WATERFORD OPEN ISSUE Task: A-113, A-135, and A-137 Reference No.: 4-84-A-06/8, 30, and 32                                            -
Characterization:    It is alleged that based on the information presented in an EBASCO memorandum on concrete placement records dated December 9,1982, a 100 percent review of the concrete placement records should have been started and the problems should have been identified on the nonconformance reports (NCRs). It is further alleged that some items which did not result in NCRs may contain deficiencies reportable to NRC pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55(e).
Initial Assessment of Significance: Based on the current knowledge that a 100 percent review was eventually completed, this item, if found to be valid, may not have any direct impact on safety. It may, however, indicate a reluc-tance on the part of the management to quickly respond to problems and to determine the root causes of the problem.
Source: Gambit Newspaper article, dated December 10, 1983;      AllegerfA' transcript, pages 31 and 43 to 45.
Approach to Resolution:
: 1. Review the references memo.
: 2. Review associated DRs, DNs, and NCRs.
: 3. Review relevant records on a sample basis.
: 4. Review items for reportability to the NRC.
: 5. Conduct any intervieves of involved personnel.
: 6. Evaluate the facts obtained and prepare conclusions.
: 7. Write SSER and define any needed licensee actions.
Status:
Review Lead:    L. Shao, Civil-Structural Support: None.
Estimated Resources: 4 man-weeks 8510020060 840717 PDR    ADOCK 05000382 E                    PDR
 
Allegation A-113                      ,
Estimated Completion: May 25, 1984 CLOSURE:
I i
i
[
l l
{
l
 
Document Name:
SSER X A-113    {jhgt Requestor's ID:
CONNIE Author's Name:
Document Connents:
Qb
 
I Document Name:
A-113 Requestor's ID:
JOHNNIE Author's Narre:
SHEWMAKER/jkh Document Coments:
 
i                                                                                                    DRAFT 1 07/17/84
      ~                                                    '
    .                                                          WATERF0'D'0R PEN ISSUE t
Task: A-113, A-135, and A-137
:            Reference No.: 4-84-A-06/8, 30, and 32 Characterization:                  It is alleged that based on the information presented in an EBASCO memorandum on concrete placement records dated December 9,1982, a 100 percent review of the concrete placement records should have been started and the problems should have been identified on the nonconformance reports (NCRs).        It is further alleged that some items which did not result in NCRs 4            may contain deficiencies reportable to NRC pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55(e).
1 Initial Assessment of Significance: Based on the current knowledge that a
  !          100 percent review was eventually completed, this item, if found to be valid, may not have any direct impact on safety. It may, however, indicate a reluc-tance on the part of the management to quickly respond to problems and to determine the root causes of the problem.
Source: Gambit hewspaper article', dated December 10, 1983; Alleger 'A transcript, pages 31 and 43 to 45.
Approach to Resolution:
d
!            1.        Reviewthereference/ memo.
: 2.        Review associated DRs, DNs, and NCRs.
: 3.        Review relevant records on a sample basis.
: 4.        Review items for reportability to the NRC.
: 5.        Conduct any interviews of involved personnel.
: 6.        Evaluate the facts obtained and prepare conclusions.
: 7.        Write SSER and define any needed licensee actions.                                -
Status:
Review Lead:              L. Shao, Civil-Structural Support: None.
Estimated Resources: 4 man-weeks
 
Allegation A-113    -                                Estimated Completion: May 25, 1984
      ~                              '            '
    -          CLOSURE:
M 4
l l
l
                          .}}

Latest revision as of 03:43, 23 July 2020

Allegation Investigation Repts 4-84-a-06/8,30 & 32,Draft 1 Re Allegations A-113,A-135 & A-137 Concerning Need for Review of Concrete Placement Records Based Ebasco Svcs,Inc 821209 Memo & Problems Noted in Nonconformance Repts
ML20132H105
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/17/1984
From:
NRC
To:
Shared Package
ML17198A272 List:
References
RTR-NUREG-0787, RTR-NUREG-787 4-84-A-06-8, 4-84-A-6-8, A-113, A-135, A-137, NUDOCS 8510020060
Download: ML20132H105 (6)
v • d • e


Text

.

DRAFT 1 07/17/84 WATERFORD OPEN ISSUE Task: A-113, A-135, and A-137 Reference No.: 4-84-A-06/8, 30, and 32 -

Characterization: It is alleged that based on the information presented in an EBASCO memorandum on concrete placement records dated December 9,1982, a 100 percent review of the concrete placement records should have been started and the problems should have been identified on the nonconformance reports (NCRs). It is further alleged that some items which did not result in NCRs may contain deficiencies reportable to NRC pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55(e).

Initial Assessment of Significance: Based on the current knowledge that a 100 percent review was eventually completed, this item, if found to be valid, may not have any direct impact on safety. It may, however, indicate a reluc-tance on the part of the management to quickly respond to problems and to determine the root causes of the problem.

Source: Gambit Newspaper article, dated December 10, 1983; AllegerfA' transcript, pages 31 and 43 to 45.

Approach to Resolution:

1. Review the references memo.
2. Review associated DRs, DNs, and NCRs.
3. Review relevant records on a sample basis.
4. Review items for reportability to the NRC.
5. Conduct any intervieves of involved personnel.
6. Evaluate the facts obtained and prepare conclusions.
7. Write SSER and define any needed licensee actions.

Status:

Review Lead: L. Shao, Civil-Structural Support: None.

Estimated Resources: 4 man-weeks 8510020060 840717 PDR ADOCK 05000382 E PDR

Allegation A-113 ,

Estimated Completion: May 25, 1984 CLOSURE:

I i

i

[

l l

{

l

Document Name:

SSER X A-113 {jhgt Requestor's ID:

CONNIE Author's Name:

Document Connents:

Qb

I Document Name:

A-113 Requestor's ID:

JOHNNIE Author's Narre:

SHEWMAKER/jkh Document Coments:

i DRAFT 1 07/17/84

~ '

. WATERF0'D'0R PEN ISSUE t

Task: A-113, A-135, and A-137

Reference No.: 4-84-A-06/8, 30, and 32 Characterization: It is alleged that based on the information presented in an EBASCO memorandum on concrete placement records dated December 9,1982, a 100 percent review of the concrete placement records should have been started and the problems should have been identified on the nonconformance reports (NCRs). It is further alleged that some items which did not result in NCRs 4 may contain deficiencies reportable to NRC pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55(e).

1 Initial Assessment of Significance: Based on the current knowledge that a

! 100 percent review was eventually completed, this item, if found to be valid, may not have any direct impact on safety. It may, however, indicate a reluc-tance on the part of the management to quickly respond to problems and to determine the root causes of the problem.

Source: Gambit hewspaper article', dated December 10, 1983; Alleger 'A transcript, pages 31 and 43 to 45.

Approach to Resolution:

d

! 1. Reviewthereference/ memo.

2. Review associated DRs, DNs, and NCRs.
3. Review relevant records on a sample basis.
4. Review items for reportability to the NRC.
5. Conduct any interviews of involved personnel.
6. Evaluate the facts obtained and prepare conclusions.
7. Write SSER and define any needed licensee actions. -

Status:

Review Lead: L. Shao, Civil-Structural Support: None.

Estimated Resources: 4 man-weeks

Allegation A-113 - Estimated Completion: May 25, 1984

~ ' '

- CLOSURE:

M 4

l l

l

.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20132H105&oldid=2917032"