ML20137T502
| ML20137T502 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 06/27/1984 |
| From: | NRC |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17198A272 | List:
|
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0787, RTR-NUREG-787 4-84-A-06-21, 4-84-A-6-21, A-126, A-291, NUDOCS 8510020347 | |
| Download: ML20137T502 (4) | |
Text
REVIS0N 0 06/27/84 SSER Task: Allegation A-126, A-291 4-84-A-06[21,172 Refer.nce No.:
Characterization:
ItisallegedthatTompkins-Beckwith(T-B)didnotmaintain material traceability on the supglgntal steel used with pipe hangers and supports.
The supplemental steeT-ireans additional steel used to install pre-fabricated pipe hangers and supports.
p.teddr0%Irl Assessment of Allegation: Bergen-Patterson (B-P) furnished piping supports and hangers.
EBASCOfurnishedkupplementalstructuralsteelfohusebyT-Bduring installation of the piping ^ hangers and supports.
The EBASCO specifications and 10 CFR 50, Appendix B requirements specify that only properly certified material in accordance with ASTM specifications be used for supports and hangers.
B-P and the structural steel suppliers to EBASCO provided Certificates of Compliance (C of C) with each shipment. The C of C stated that the material furnished met ASTM specifications.
The EBASCO Material Inspection Receiving Report (MIRR) was used to verify that the correct material was received.
ARequisitiononWarehouse(R0W)wasused by T-B to obtain release of the material from EBASCO.
The initial T-B program was established to provide traceability of the paint to be used on the supplemental steel. A material control rumber was steel stenciled on each item listed on the R0W.
If the material was cut into smaller pieces, the number was to be transferred accordingly.
After number stamping, the material was painted by a subcontractor.
Different colored paint was used with yellow signify'ing non-safety non-permanent material.
The other colors used designated safety related material.
E
l a In 1978 T-B agreed to a contract change with EBASCO to extend the paint 7
material traceability system to also include steel traceability.
Because the change came after the original program had been in operation, a number of implementation problems occurred and providing full steel traceability proved difficult.
In late 1983, the contract between E8ASCO and T-B was changed to reflect a decision by EBASCO to abandon attempts to provide supplemental structural steel traceability using material control numbers. The supplemental structural steel certification program continued to be in effect as it had been throughout the project.
The alleger based his concern on his knowledge of the material traceability system that was in effect June 1978 to 1984.
The system described in the allegation is not representative of the original or final programs. The change back to the origingdpterial cgntrol system in early 1984 resolves th m
concern of the alleger. disr ation concludes that the support material traceability meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B.
We\\ t / R sdh hnr,55d ktn f have discuss ourfindingwiththeallegeronMay
,y 98 g He agreed and expressed satisfaction with our., explanation and resolut ong.
This allegation Mr has no safety significance, a epngh.
g
/
tential Violations: None Actions Reouired:
None.
References 1.
T-B Procedure TP8-49 2.
T-B Procedure TPB-19
.s -.
Statement Prepared By:
R. W. Hubbard Date Reviewed By:
Team Leader Date Reviewed By:
SiteTeamLeader(s)
Date Approved By:
Task Management Date t
5
Document Name:
l-SSER X A-I26 lh -(2 (o, IEce. O, fo(2qj'yq Requestor's ID:
CONNIE lW SETYP$
EY Author's Name:
00 it/O r 0 f "'T E h C*)Pt 6#)
Document Comments:
46*"f-conyn from displaywritter 5/29/84 (p l %
/
(
s k) 6 gp A
p4 g id g,4, a
- n o
,, c,
e se s
p C.'-
6PA g2f6
-;any s
-gr
%og.m9,p p>
r f
'l
, (6 *
- v e'
eg,a s t, f f e
p p.
pM
'% Y Y'
<,q.
&y e bi
"(C g5 s@
V
-