ML20132G336
| ML20132G336 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 07/25/1984 |
| From: | LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17198A272 | List:
|
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0787, RTR-NUREG-787 PR-840725, NUDOCS 8510010527 | |
| Download: ML20132G336 (2) | |
Text
.
{\\s fv t J C$ b ' -
i i s>
p lou 181AN A POWER A LIGHT
- PUBLIC RELAliONS DEPARTMENT,142 DELAPONDE ST., HEW ORLEANS, LA 70174 e TELEPHONE (504) 3 C
- + ai., ;;
July 25,1984 Call Jim Fort at (504)S95-2427 Despite the time-consuming ros icw by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission relative to licensing of Waterford 3, Louisiana Fowcr C Light Company said today that it expects that the plant can be in commerciel operation in the first quarter of 1985.
James M. Cain, president and chief executive officer of LP&L, said it now appears that it will be late August or possibly September before the Company obtains the necessary operating licensc from the NRC which will
^
allow it to load fuel into the reactor and begin low-power testing. Construction and pre-operational testing of the plant was comp!cted in the second quarter of 1984, and the Company was hopeful it would obtain permission to load fuel at the end of May.
"A Septe nber fuel loading would mean that it will bt the first quarter of 1985 before we can put the unit into commercial opcration instead of the previously targeted end-of-198t1 operation," Ccin cald.
He explained that construction costs are currently cbout $50 million below budget, and that the projected first quarter operating date is not expected to result in an Increase of the present $2.65 billion estimated cost of the plant.
"We are firmly convinced that we have an excclient, well-built nuclear generating facility," Cain said, "and we are determined to bring this plant into commercial operation safely, and within the requirements of all NRC regulations."
05 toot 0527 84o725 gg PDR ADOCK 05000M2 E
~
m.
DISTRIBUTION OF NEWS ARTICLES l
J. Collins l
RA Staff-l C. Wisner G. Sanborn l
'DRS&P l-DRS&S l
DRM&A l
F. Ingram, Public Affairs, MNBB l
Fax Copies of Comanche Peak:
R. Bangart (Task Force)
Task' Force (CPSES)
T. Ippolito, CPSES S. Trehy, ELD, MNBB T. Ippolito, Phillips Building, Room 542 l
i Resident Inspector i
i Fax Copies of Waterford:
L L/. Crutchfield (Task Force)
D J. Gagliardo (Task Force)
S. Turk, ELD, MMBB, Mail Stop 9604 Resident Inspector l
--Original in appropriate file located on Barbara Murray's desk.
--Copies of other news articles such as FSV, Wolf Creek, etc. should be faxed to the appropriate resident.
l l
i i
r
b A
a~
g] '
EMDRANDUM FOR: Jesse L. Funches, Director Planning & Program Analysis Staff FROM:
Darrell G. Eisenhut Director Division of Licensing
SUBJECT:
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FUNDING DEEDS FOR NRR, IE, AND REGION IV This memorandum responds to yours of July 24,1984, on the above subject. The enclosure provides the estimated FY84 funding needs for Comanche Peak, Waterford, and Wolf Creek.
Original Signed By..:
V*w Darre 1 G. Ei hut, Director Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
T. Ippolito D. Crutchfield K. Kniel M. Williams DISTRIBUTION (Blue Ticket #(pD Central Files TAPMG Reading FMiraglia/DEisenhut MJambor (BT452.)
PHungerbuhler (BT#$$3.)
GMeyer a,-,,,,
vpy v g,y<
v D@i' s
..ot:.1Ayb.....qqqp/.....
c=>
"=>.m4hs.oa.nNchf.ielr
.i.senb.t.....
o^">.. 7. /g /.8. 4......
.... 7.4. T. 8. 4........ i.,7 Q/.8. 4................................,....................,..................
c ow unim em wcoeun ass e - ! n e - --ra a n e - e /
w m ora "n-v
ENCLOSURE FY84 ESTIMATED FUNDING NEEDS AUGUST SEPTEMBER Comanche Peak NRR Contracts (to date - 175K)
FIN A-6819 INEL 100K 100K B-3077 ETEC 40K 30K A-0802 LLNL 60K 44K A-6821 INEL 60K 40K 260K 214K IE Contracts (to date - 450K)
Parameters 20K 20K Region IV Contracts (to date - 50K)
FIN A-3600 BNL 20K TOTALS TO DATE - 675K NEED 300K 234K Waterford NRR Contracts (to date - 498K)
FIN A-6819 3K A-6821 B-3077 10K IE Contracts (to date - 210K)
Region IV Contracts (to date - 60K) total 13K Wolf Creek NRR Contracts IC Contracts Region IV Contracts l
FIN A-6701 30K TOTAL 30K
l# &W 1
- p otec
- f S
UNITED STATES i
F"
.-Q NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[
U-wAssiNoton, o. c. 20sss A/
E W
J J
%....*/
JUN 121984 QQ
.)
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Harold R. Denton, Director, NRR Richard C. DeYoung, Director, IE Rcbert B. Minogue, Director, RES Thomas E. Murley, Regional Administrator, R-I James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator, R-II James G. Keppler, Regional Administrator, R-III John T. Collins, Regional Administrator, R-IV Learned W. Barry, Director & Controller, RM William [.Dircks FROM:
Executive Director for Operations
SUBJECT:
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CJBANCHLEEE PLAN FOR THE COMPLETION OF OUTSTANDING REGULATORY ACTIONS Recently, Tom Ippolito, Project Director for Comanche Peak, circulated for review and discussed with a number of us, the Comanche Peak Plan for the completion of Outstanding Regulatory Actions (Enclosure 1).
This plan has been approved and I am now requesting actions by each of you, as specified below, to implement the plan.
These actions are consistent with my discussions with Regional Administrators during the management meeting on May 17-18,1984, and my memorandum of May 25, 1984.
The Plan describes regulatory actions in four major areas (licensing, hearing, inspection, and allegations) and identifies the resource requirements (including funding) needed to complete these regulatory actions.
All activities are geared toward completion by October 1,1984, the Applicant's projected fuel load date.
Most of the resources needed are to form a Technical Review Team (TRT) to evaluate and resolve a large number of technical issues, including allegations, presently identified.
The TRT staffing and technical groups breakdown is shown in Enclosure 2.
Approximately two-thirds of the TRT reviewers will be drawn from contracted resources; however, NRC staff resources will be used to supervise each technical group and to integrate their activities with ongoing Region IV activities.
The resources will be distributed between the various offices to minimize the impact on any single organization.
Where supervisory personnel are required for the lead of each of the TRT technical groups, I expect you to nominate individuals who can manage effectively in a demanding and visible environment.
All personnel should be fully qualified for the requested function and should have a proven capability of balancing a number of views to reach a conclusion.
In adjusting internally for resource allocation, you should ensure that l operating reactors are adequately covered.
O ' U ([ m
~
t r
- l 3
l.
~.
Resourc'e needs, by Office, are identified below..To the extent possible, re-sources identified should include individuals already familiar with the Comanche Peak project, or those familiar with the regulatory actions completion program at Waterford.
1.
NRR 2 Project Managers to coordinate additional licensing actions Technical Reviewer to coordinate OI activities with the TRT Program Manager 2.
I E, k sistant (Deputy) to the Program Manager of the TRT (Jim Gagliardo ha: already been designated to this function for both Waterford and Comanche Peak).
3.
IE, NRR, RES and Regions I,II, and III Group Leader to manage the Electrical / Instrumentation group of the TRT.
Group Leader to manage a joint Civil Engineering and Mechanical Engineering group of the TRT.
Group Leader to manage the Test Program Group of the.TRT.
Group Leader to manage the QA/QC Records Group of the TRT.
The-assignment of an individual who previously participated in the Comanche Peak special review held in early April 1984, would be desirable.
Group Leader to manage the Coatings Group of the-TRT.
4.
Region IV On an as needed basis and upon request of the Project Director.
Region IV will provide 2-3 inspectors to support the TRT effort.
5.
ORM Financial resources (as previously identified in separate correspondence fromH.Denton)tosupportcontractedactivities.
These needs include:
hpproximately 2/3 of the staff of the TRT*
inspection personnel to augment Region IV inspection effort technical expertise for coatings issues t
Candidates are to be identified directly to J. Roe by June 14, 1984 Designated individuals should be available for commencement of their assigned tasks on about June 18, 1984.
If there are any questions regarding this memorandum please contact me promptly.
~
k illiam J. Dirckr E xecutive Director for Operations
Enclosures:
As Stated cc:
J. B. Martin, RV B. Hayes, O!
--P--N o r ry, ADM G. Cunningham, ELD T. Ippolito, DL/NRR D. Eisenhut, DL/NRR J Davis, HMSS P
(
e
., s ENCLOSURE 1 C0ftANCHE PEAK PLAN FOR THE COMPLETION OF OllT. STANDING REGULATORY ACTIONS MAY 1984 Aoproval:
E. La v6. s. Tt't m t. mL.% -
e, 'n 'g4 R. OcYoung', D rector, IE Date
.n YV$5%
_.? EbW H.* E. Denton, Director, NRR Date' R.S. o or L \\iria #.
- v. -r. T, 5.
- , 's k J. T.- Collins, Aomini s tra t.nr Date Region IV S'}I}0l"$${ffy/7 l
j.
C0!iAriC45 PC/X FLt.t FCP THE C0!dPLETI0t! 0F Ol5T.Y!hlt r REGHLATOPY ACTI0t!S I.
PilPPOSE AtlD SC0pE On flarch 12,19PA the EDO direcuo I:RR to ranace all necessary ?!PC actions leading to licensing decisicrs fr Cyranche Peak and llaterford.
A copy cf that directive is included as Attt.Wont 1.
This plan establishes the progran for Comanche Peak.
The purpose of this plan is to assure the overall coordination and integration of the outstandir? reculatory actions regardine Comanche Peak, and achieving their resolutinn prior to a licensing decision.
This plan encompasses all licensing, inspection, bearing, and allepation issues.
Further, this plan addresses the scope of the work needed, specifies the critical path issues, identifies tne responsible line organization, the schedule for completien, and (.dete applicable) the need for additinrel resources to neet the schedule.
The planned completion date for all rectalatory actions is assumed to be October 1,1984, and resource needs are predicated on that assumption.
A status report will be issued to managenent every two weekt startino two weeks after the approval of the plan.
BACKGROUND Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Unit 1 is in the final stages of the operating license review process.
The Construction Permits for Unit 1.
and 2 were issued on December 19, 1974 Texas Utilities docketed their application for operating licenses en April 25, 1978. The Firal Envirormental Statement was issued September 24, 1981.
The Safety Evaluation Deport (SER) was issued on July 14, 1981.
Because of the large number of outstanding issues identified in the SER, the staff recommended deleying the ACR$ review.
SER Supplement ifo. I was issued on Octcber 16,19P1, and the ACRS meetire was held on November 13, 1981.
The ACRS, by letter dated 'levencer 17,1?P1, supported issuance of an ooereting license.
The lates* SER supplement was issued on November 23, 1983.
Comanche Peak has been in a heavily contested hearing for over two years.
All but one contention have been disnissed.
The ren'ainino centention questions the ability of the applicant's Ouality Assurance /Ouality Control program to prevent deficiencies in the design ard construction n# the plant.
The Licensing Board has edmitted many allegations of design and construction deficiencies into the hearing as relevant to this contention.
The Applicants are currently pro.iecting a fuel load date for Unit 1 to be in late Septenhor InF4 The basis for this profection was provided te the staff on Pay 7, 1984 This fuel load date repears achiavable but allows nn flexibility for unexpected avants in a very tioht scertula.
>The number of hearing issues and uncertainty regardine the timinn cf the Licensing Board's initial decision may iroact the fuel loed.
l
-?-
III. PLAN F00 THE C0f1PLETICt' N Di;TFT;"0!!T, REGULATORY ACTIOrls l
This plan describes the mathed ir snich coordinated regulatory actions are to be taken by the staff to be ready to support en flRC decision regarding Comanche Peak licensinc.
As stated in the Purpose, the plar encompasses all licensino, hearing, inspection, and allegation issues.
l This summary eddresses the scope o' work needed, identi' irs the responsible'line nrganization, the schedule for completion, and the resource needs to meet the schrcule.
The management organizational.irrannement responsible for directing the overall effort and coordinating actions by the vrrious involved offices is shown graphically in the enclosure to the EDO memorandum of March 12,1984 (Attachment 1). The management is under the overall direction of T. A. Ippolito, who reports to the' Director of the Division of Licensing.
The managers responsible for implementing and directing this organization are the following individuals:
Project Director IT. A. locolitn)
- - - - - -4 OELD Contact (J. Scintnil
- - - - - -101 Contact (B. Payes il NRR Action Region IV Actions IE Actions (T. Novak)
(R.Bangart)
(R. DeYoung)
The line offices will centinue to manage their own responsibilities regarding Comancho Peak in accordance with the schedule anc objectives of this plan.
Line office activities are to be coordinated with the program management organitation via their representative as identified above.
Additional rescurces are expected to be necessary to support licensing, hearing, and inspection issues, and substOntial resources are necessary to respond to the approxinetely 400 allegations regardinn Comanche Peak.
This plan proposes the fomation of an Technical Review Team (TRT) to evaluate and resolve a number of technical issues, including allegations, presently identified.
A proposed oroanizational chart of the TRT is shown below.
The aroups identified will be assigned to evaluate and resolve technical issues and allegations that have been grouped into five technical areas:
QA/QC, Electrical / Instrumentation Civil /itechanical, Coatings, and Test Programs.
The proups will bc l
comprised of a group leader and reviewers that are specialists in the particular technical area.
t t
-3 Comanche Peak Technical Review Tean (TRT)
Pro,4ect Director Decutv Pro.iect Directne i
Office of Investications AROUP LEADERS CA)nC Electrical /
Civil /Nchanical Coa' tings Test Program Records Instrumentation and c
Operational Readiness The staffing of these groups will be drawn from the various NDC oHices and/or contractors as arranged between the Project Director and line management.
The TRT may be called together for a specified perind of time, dispersed back to the individual's parent office, and then reconstituted in whole or in part as needed to corolete resolution of like issues.
The TRT will be under the direct supervision of the Pro,4ect Director.
In accordance with the EDO memorandun of t'ay ?5,1984, the TRT organization is scheduled to be in place and functioning by iune 4 MP4 l
Detailed guidance will be issued by the Prn,1cct Directer to the Technical Review Team and other participants in this effort.
This guidance will address the following:
l'ethod and apprcach for identification and disposition of allegations Tracking Sys'.cm Preparatien of Documentation and Records Protection of Individuals Initiation of Special NRC actions, such as Confirmation of Action Letters or 50.54(fl l
Ictters Manpower accountino The basis upon which the schedules and rosnurce es*inates have bean developed is that the Conanche Peak fuel lead date is Octnber 1, 1984 l
Ficure 1 is en overall schedule and Fioures 2 thrnuch 5 ara individual schedules for the resolution of Licensing, Hearing, inspection, and Allepttions Pegulatory Actions, respectivel.v.
l l
l
f,.
7-The ne,4nr issues, schedules, and rescurce es" nates needed to neet I
the schedules are sumnarized as follws.
A.
Licensino Reculetory Actions Licensing Actions are these th4rgs resulting frem the desicr review of the FSAR.
NPR is responsible for the resolutier of these actier itens.
The total nunber of outstanding action items is 37.
Four of these action items are considered to have the potential for impacting the schedule.
These items relate to 1) the aceouacy of the TDI diesel generators, 2) the the Applicants' exenption request for relief from GDC-4, 3) review of the Cygna Reccet of an independent essessment of desion and constructicn, ard 4) electrical equipment envirnrmental cualificatien, flRR experience with other facilities involved in complex licensine reviews (Diablo Canyon, Seabrook, and Shoreham) indica +.es that additional project management resources are necessary.
Two additional project nanagers for the period from June-Septenber will be needed, for a total of 8 man-months of additional effort.
The technical resources presently assigned by NRR to evaluate and resolve the renaining open licensing actions are sufficient to meet the schedule shown in Figure 2.
Additional IE resources are ret expected to be required as the CAT inspection is complete and 0A/0C reviews and emergency preparedness reviews are essentially complete.
B.
Hearino Peculatory Actions Hearing /.ctions are those issues in contention before the ASLC.
There are three major issues each with a number c' sub-issues.
The three major issues are Desion Adequacy and Ouality Assurence, Construction Adequacy, and Construction Ouality Assurance.
There are two critical path actions:
Desion Adenuecy and Construction Adecuacy. The design adecuacy action concerns an IDVP Feing perforned by the Applicants at the staff's request.
CYGflA is perforning the review for the Applicants.
This is currently under review by the staff.
Cygna personnel actions nay have contributed +o be prenntifi-cation of inspection areas to Applicant 0A/0C personnel.
Resolution of this concern nay make it necessary to recuest additieral independent assessment activities.
The critical path issue concerning Construction Adecuacy is enntainment liner coating (painting).
+
The resources presently availaFe r, e su4icient to resolve 711 hearing actions with the exceptina e' the critical path issues.
It is estimated that 10 man-mon e s are recuired to resnive the Desien Adequacy Action, and 6 r e -tenths to evaluate the Construcd on Adeouacy Action (painting).
The design adecuacy review will reovire a tean composed of IE and NRR personnel, similar to the Cygna IDVP effort.
Coordination of Hearing activities is expected in be extensive and involve intenrating the activities nf MRR, OELD, and Recion IP with the Technical Review Tean.
An additional seninr ranager (SES-leveli is needed to manace this effort as it is expected that the Project Director will dovete full time effort to nanagement of the technical review team actions gommencing June 4, 19P4 These estimates assume that the reviews will cenclude that the existing circumstances are acceptable to the staff and/or no major corrective actions are recuired of the Applicants.
Should this orove othendise, additional resources will be recuired for resolution.
See Figure 3 for Hearing Testinony.Conoletion Schedule.
C.
Insoections Reculaterv Actions Inspection actions are those that assure that adecuate cercletion of plant construction and the readiness of the Applicants te operate the plant.
These actions are the responsibility of Region IV.
The total number of outstanding action itens is 377.
These.mey be grouped as follows:
SER verification:
30 actions Rnutine construction inspections, precoerational test program and operatione.1 readiness inspections and startup test progran:
121 actions Operating Licensirg:
20 actions Open items inspections (unresolved itens, violations, 50.55(e) items, inspector follow-up items and Part 21 items:
P01 actions
~
Room inspections:
TBD CAT follow-up:
5 acticns All the inspection itens require resolution prior to OL issuance.
Pany reouire applicant actions prior tn inspection or relate to hearing issues.
Particularly sionificant is the roter,t inspection effort as the applicant plans to re-run approyinately 25 precoerationel tests to confinn systen readiness subseouent to various modifications and design changes.
Many of these tests will be witnessed by the NRC and test results will be evaluated as eppenpriate.
Svstens involved include safecuards systans, reactne protective systen, service water, component cooling watnr, and the diesel generatnr.
4 The number of inspection items represents e sizeable effort that could imoact fuel load, t
6.-
t Scme additional resources will be recuired to ccrplete the rnutine i
inspection progran and resolve the rany cpen itens.
't is expacted
)
~
that this area could require approximately 46 man-r.onths.
Considering the number of items and based on Haterford experience, the Region
[
estimates that much of this effort ccr be handled with exis'.4rc resources but that approximately 18 man-ronths e(ditional resources will be recuired.
See Figure a for the Inspections Schedule.
D.
A11ecations Reculatory Actions The Allegation Actions are those concerns reported by vprious individuals, intervenors and action groups recording the safetv of constructi.on of the plant. Concernsregarding[irongdoings{)
[]ntimidationjetc.arenotincludedinthetechnicalreviewtean 3
t effort but are referred to O! or OIA as appropriate.
To date the number of individual ac,tions is approxinately 400.
These actions are grouped into specific categories to fac111 tete their resolution.
Resolution'of these actiers will involvo the Technical Review Team, NRR, 01, and Region IV.
The organizational group with prinary responsibility for resolution of these actions is the Technical Review Team (TRT).
The resources required to resolve these actions are identified below according to the Team functional group:
l Resource Functional Group No. of A11ecations Estinate (man-ronths)
QA/QC Records 180 17 Electrical /Instrum.
5 2
Civil /fiechanical 97 17 Coatings 11 4
i Test Programs 14
?
Estimated Totals 7U7 "T7~
The TRT effort is expected to recuire additional administrative support (secretarial) of aperoximately 3 man-months. Hence, the total TRT resource needs are 45 man-rnnths.
j The total progran for resolvine the allecations actinns is a critical path item.
See Figure 5 for the schedule for completien of the review of these allegations.
I 4
l i
1 P
~*
. In addition, 97 allegations will be hardled by the following offices:
Responsible I
functional Group No. of Allecations Head Office
[Intimica tion]
30 OI Design Pipe / Pipe Supports 19 NRR i
Vendor / Generic 18 NRR/IE Independent Assessment Program 7
NRR Miscellaneous 23 RIV Design of pipe and pipe supports, and the Independent Assessment Program allegations will be dispositioned by NRR personnel that are handling these issues for the hearings.
Intimidation allegations will require addjtional OI resources, as discussed later in this section.
Existing resources in the Vendor Inspection Branch, IE and NRR will disposition the vendor / generic allegations.
Existing resources in Region IV will be responsible for the miscellaneous allegations.
7 E.
Office of Investication Actions O! actions are those actions necessary to support the r olution l
of 311egations.
They involve issues where wrong-doing, ntimidation]
orth.arrassment]may be involved.
It is clear that with the present resources assigned to the Ccmanche Peak investigation (one investigator) the schedule for resolving l
the allegations and wrongdoing issues will not be met.
We estimate several additional investigators will be required on full time basis from June through September, for a total of 12 man-nonths of effort.
l During this 4-month period O! will reouire the full-time sucport of one individual with a technical background, as many allegetions are a combination of technical and wrong-doing issues, for a total of 4 I
man months.
i l
The NPC staff effort to complete the actions in the licensing, hearings, inspections and allegations areas will be substantial and the impact will be l
felt by several Offices. The foregoing sumary lists a total of 821 separate i
actions recuiring approximately 100 man-months of effort above the existing (budgeted) resources.
Personnel for much of this effort will be obtained i
from contractors.
It is estimated that approximately $1 million will be necessary to fund contractor assistance in support of Comanche Peak reviews l
during the remainder of FY 1984 The estimates are somewhat fragile and assume that no major new issues are raised, that the Applicants meet their projected schedule, and that sta#f review of the identified issues will conclude that the existing circumstances, or the resolution, is acceptable, j
?
L L
l
- */
'o UNITED STATES
~ ~ ' ~
I ' y,., 7 ~,j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 l
=
MAR 121934 MEMORANDUM FOR: John T. Collins, Regional Administrator Region IV Harold R. Denton, Director
.4 04 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Richard C. DeYoung, Director Office of Inspection a. Enforcement FROM:
William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations
SUBJECT:
COMPLETION OF OUTSTANDING REGULATORY ACTIONS ON CDMANCHE PEAX AND WATERFORD Construction of the Comanche Peak and Waterford facilities is nearing completion. There remain a number of issues that need to be resolved before the staff can make its licensing decisions. The issues remaining for these plants are quite ccmplex and span more than one Office.
In order to assure the overall coordination / integration of these issues and to assure issues are resolved on a schedule to satisfy hearing and licensing decision needs, I am directing NRR to manage all necessary NRC actions leading to prompt licensing decisions. Darrell Eisenhut, Director, Division of Licensing, NRR is being assigned the lead responsibility for this activity. He will coordinate the efforts of NRR, IE, and Region IV, and will coordinate this activity with O! and OELO.
Prior to any of the affected Offices undertaking major activities (e.o., inspections) or making decisions on these plants, that activity should be concurred in by NRR.
We are presently in the process of assigning a dedicated senior manager to assist Mr. Eisenhut in the management of these activities.
The first phase of this program will be the identification of is:ues needed to be resolved for each plant prior to hearing and licensing decisions.
Once the issues have been identified a Program Plan for resolution of each item should be developed and impicmented.
The Program Plan should address the scope of the work needed, the identification of the responsible line organization, &nd the schedule for ccmpletion.
In principle, this effort will therefore be similar to the effort undertaken regarding the allegation review on Dicblo Canyon except that this effort should encomcass all licensing, inspection, hearing, and allegation issues.
2 Each affected Office will assign a full time senior manager to work with NRR to define, schedule and ccmplete the issues.
I expect these managers to be l
identified by each of you within a few days.
All affected offices should provide dedicated resources and give their full support to this effort, to assure that all existing issues are expeditiously handled and all new issues are promptly provided to NRR so as not to delay the licensing decisions.
In addition, copies of all information, documents, depositions, etc. should be promptly provided to NRR to ensure a coordinated approach.
I anticipate that the approaca utili:ed here will be necessary for a number of upcoming OL projects, and am directing NRR to take the lead for carrying out this activit,y.
Willi J. Dircks Executive' Director for Operations cc:
G. Cunningham, ELD
- 8. Hayes, OI 6
s M
e C.
e Fl0VERALL l'ANAGD'ENT
[ COORDINATION (NRR) a F
i 01 Centact
. i_
i I
ELD Contac*
r I
l Overall Review of E
P I
- Review of Construction QA Adecuacy' (CAT)
Review of Design and Operation Issues (IE) g Issues (Reg IV)
(NRR) b e
e e
L O
e i
0 S
e a
e 9
4 8
8 e
I l
FIGilRE I C0l4ANCifE PEAK i
l Major Regulatory Actions Schedule REGULATORY ACTintl5 llay
. lune
.luly August September October X------------------------------- ------------------------------X Licensino (SERs) lie:rino Testimony Submittals to ATLB X------------------------------------------------------X X------ -------------------------------------------------------X Inspections X-------------------------------------------X Allegations 1
r
- l i
e hi n
t ci D
i
)
)
i.
y r
e b
mI -
e t
p 1
e S
i -
t I
s u
g X
X i
u A
i yi-l u
E.
1 l
I U
D i
F l
K C
l A
S E
7 P
f l
E i
E E
I e
R H
V n
l C
E u i-G R
J i
l lA I
l G
F i
i l
D t
C i
S l
tE C
i I
L y
i a
M I
t t
t t
t t
C S
n S
E en T
I I
D E
t i
l I
li S
S S
f bt RE D
D i a I
SI sz i
FS ni E,
E E
E S
i D S
l oe DS D
D D
D D
D pa
/F
/
/
/
/
/,
/
sg Ri R
R R
R RL R
l er RD R
R R
R PD RI f
f f
fl I
PO N
N l
1 1
n n
dsi d
sn d
n f n eed
)
e n
ei e
i i i suu s
s i
.n ua3 r
n
)
.a ca i sl n
i a
ni sm i
i s
sm em asc o
at m ea se; yu 0a;m d e pe Ri n i
Rne G m IR e) rq11 mee nR SR i
t aR e
y us oe eut o
s7(l a sc gR r
nssm tRt ;R si Cs l s e
ac ei s n
o eese a
ie s -
e ae u;.ii ul e i3 t
puit msnssI b eu cu sCncf spu d
an Ds i
reUne u
ss i s spi ni sps n;
l o si -
i u eu! s ns ns i
aal i As as I
I ui RI b
f srcsi ei hi mna i
t r t
l i
gt A
T u nsoisl2 c
c wyeiu wy st cc S4( s oI FLI(1 i2 e5 ebPFD eb6 u1 l
l D
PA F
C L
T f
F 1
2 3
A 5
6 7
- !;ltlll
L e
+.
g C
4=y L
U
.cC
- s
~
C.
C M
I i
I i
I I
I I
I 8
m i
1 3
l 0
C I
0 e
W
=C
~
0 i
=
l I
J l
I
~3 I
l C
0 i
M l.aJ B
I i,
C 0
0 8
U I
I e
U1 8
I 1
0 0
0 I
J l
I a
l i
I i
1 1
I EC
>=
h""
l 1
1 I
i H
0 0
1 I
I 1
8 0
0 X
X I
E 7
I I
i l
I i
i c:
0 0
I I
I I
I 8
I I
I I
I i
M 1
1 I
I O
I I
I i
0 1
8 I
I i
8 C
I I
I I
I I
I M
I I
I I
I i
1 at ag I
I I
i i
I I
I l
W I
,.!O.
O I
i 0
0 1
I I
i C
1 8
I l
I I
I 3
WW O
~
8 9
1 0
I I
I
".2. C
>=
C I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
'I 8
1 1
X
% L'.
8C 3
I l
0 I
l I
I I
I I
- .Z
=
7
- !*C CC I
I I
i I
I B
I 8
La. Q C.
I 8
9 I
I I
I I
e i
i I
i i
l i
i W
8 I
I I
i i
I I
W 8
I I
I i
0 0,
0 I
I G.
I v
v v
v 0
1 5
0 0
1
>=
8 1
0 0
1 I
i C
8 I
I i
i i
I Q
I I
I I
I I
i A
a e
B i
i l
0 m
=
1 I
I i
I i
M 1
0 0
8 1
W 8
I X
l i
I
>=
0 0
0 1
1 v
v v
v v
C W
C Cr.
W W
c g
C at W
W
~
z u
=
C C
L Q C e.
J C
ee-J W
l.u
,==
6 4 *J C
C C
E
.J
- - to
=
.w e
M N aC m
l==
C **
W W
J W
J tc M
G C C
C C
C w
>=
C. ec N
N w
M C E
C E
>=
H CE a-
>=
C:
- =
C.
0 L c:
D:
M E
Cr.,
c:
=
>=
>=
m a
E CL C n
Z Z
P-
=
m er.,
G C
>=
m e===
-m C
C e
3l Q. C v.
m U
V 3
C t
fc 4 m
C m
C C
L E
O O
- =
mG C 4.J r;
ed n
L U - V
'C L
C **=
C
= U C C L
L m C.
m C
== C L C
.w m >-
C
- J
- =
. * +J V
C 6
C Q
- C eU
.C m *%
0 C C tc
- J C
- O CB C
==
C O - +=
C
- C *C C
L C O
CE h
o4 C
CQ
+J E Q
C.
3=C v
C.
m L
t h C-to v mmm L m
- c. m C
e C re ac re e
L C-c C m x
v t mo
- c. e o
c-e te > b
- " m
- =
0m V
-C e ac 0 0
W D C-C L
V.
ec 4
% U ft L C C
- = U m C.
Q. 4 8
r== %
E6 m U m m
-C
- e=
C C-C 4
w CL r3 *-
L
- *~
m C C v C.
C. 3
- e=
re e C* m 0 m
O 6
- J "C'
mC r L'
et *-
-C L
CC D *-
- C m
a4 C6 w
- = C e=
%==
C.*=
-w ec C
L C t.",
e
- . w C C; V
C Z
- =.C CD +J C =0
==
at C
et
- e-0 C
Q e-
- ~
J v 0 V w
- -=
C' O.
O U
C e.
C g at e
e e
e e
e e
e e
Cr~
e to 4
tc m
.C U
v G s==
N M
e:r L.t1 4
h.
T r
+
1 FIGIIRE 4 CDMAllCHF PEAK SCllEDilLE IriSPECTint' AtlD REGI0rlAL RESP 0fiSIBil.ITIES April May June July
_ August September
[
October i
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
i 1
l l
l -- I'
--X nnstruction inspec.
X----------
~
HC 2517 Construction Inspec.
X----------
X Items followup 50.55(c) Items, X-----------
X P:rt ?! items I"II"*"P Primarily X-Prim,arily Test Wit nessing,-Proc--- -------------
edures Review Test Preoperation
X Inspections itC 7513 Results Review Preopera tional X-----------
r------------
X inspec. Items followup Procedures R ev iew X Post-OL-----------X etartup Test X-----------
X a
Program inspec.
tiitnessing itC 7514 1
Operational x
x x (Final Rpt)
Readiness deport per Module 94300 SER Verification X-Itens from SSER's 1-4
-Itens from SSER 5 X
X
(
IE Rulletins inspec.
X------------ -------------
X Illscellaneous X------------
X Allegations Resolution Operatnr Licensing X--------- --------X
~,
~..
FICill<E 5 C0HANCllE' PEAK
~. '. '
4 Allegations Resolution Sr.hedule April May June July August September October i
i i
l 1
i i
I I
I I
I I
l l
I I
I I
I l-l.
Plan Approval X
?.
Personnel X-- ---X
. Arrangement
^
3.
Obtain Logistic X------ ---X Support 4.
Develop Revievt X---------- ---X Packages-5.
Task Force X
Briefing &
. Assignments 6.
First Site X-- X Review Period 7.
Second Site X-----X Review Period 8
Third Site X-----)
Review Period t
9.
Prepare Final X----X Draft SSER g
.10.
11anagemen t-
^
X---X Review 11.
Final Report X----X 17 Submit Report X
to ASI.B
^
TECHNICAL REVIElf TEAM (TRT) STAFFING Program flanager 01 Assistant Tech. Reviewer 1
- VA)DC-~
Electrical /
Records Instrumentation Civil /flechanical Coatings Test Program Leader Leader Leader Leader Leader 7 Reviewers 2 Reviewers 7 Rbviewers 2 Reviewers
? Reviewers Design Change Control Electrical Engineer Mechnical Engr (2)
Pai.nt & Coatings Preoperational
/ Configuration Hogmnt IAC Engineer Piping & Pipe Engineer Test Engineers OA Audt-Procedures Supports Engineer Mechnical Engineer QA Audit-Document Welding & NDE Engr Control / Records (2)
Civil Engineer nA Audit-Oualif A Concrete & Rebar Training Engineer QC-Held flDE Exmnr Structural Engineer QC-Concrete Exmnr (3 Sessions *)
(1 Session.)
(3 Sessions)
(? Sessions)**
(1 Session)
E
- Each onsite " session" is a minimum of 17 days g"
- In addition to Drnokhaven flational Laboratory review currently in progress y
3 4
ro o
1