ML072360232: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
| document type = Letter, Meeting Summary
| document type = Letter, Meeting Summary
| page count = 10
| page count = 10
| project =
| stage = Draft RAI
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:September 7, 2007LICENSEE:PPL Susquehanna, LLCFACILITY:Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2
{{#Wiki_filter:September 7, 2007 LICENSEE: PPL Susquehanna, LLC FACILITY:     Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON AUGUST 23, 2007, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON AUGUST 23, 2007, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PPL SUSQUEHANNA, LLC, CONCERNING DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PPL Susquehanna, LLC held a telephone conference call on August 23, 2007, to discuss and clarify the staffs draft requests for additional information (D-RAIs) concerning the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2, license renewal application. The telephone conference call was useful in clarifying the intent of the staffs D-RAIs. provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a listing of the D-RAIs discussed with the applicant, including a brief description on the status of the items.
 
COMMISSION AND PPL SUSQUEHANNA, LLC, CONCERNING DRAFT
 
REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE
 
SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, LICENSE
 
RENEWAL APPLICATION The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PPL Susquehanna, LLC held a telephone conference call on August 23, 2007, to discuss and clarify
 
the staff's draft requests for additional information (D-RAIs) concerning the Susquehanna Steam
 
Electric Station, Units 1 and 2, license renewal application. The telephone conference call was
 
useful in clarifying the intent of the staff's D-RAIs. provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a listing of the D-RAIs discussed with the applicant, including a brief description on the status of the items.
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
/RA/Evelyn Gettys, Project Manager License Renewal Branch A
                                                /RA/
 
Evelyn Gettys, Project Manager License Renewal Branch A Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388
Division of License Renewal
 
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==


As stated cc w/encls: See next page  
As stated cc w/encls: See next page
 
ML072360232OFFICEPM:RLRA:DLRLA:DLRBC:RLRA:DLRNAMEEGettysSFigueroaLLundDATE09/4/0709/06/0709/07/07
 
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS AUGUST 23, 2007 PARTICIPANTS AFFILIATIONSEvelyn GettysU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)Simon ShengNRC Duane FilchnerPPL Susquehanna, LLC (PPL)
Jeff WeikPPL Mike DetamorePPL DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION August 23, 2007 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PPL Susquehanna, LLC held a telephone conference call on August 23, 2007, to discuss and clarify
 
the following draft requests for additional information (D-RAIs) concerning the Susquehanna
 
Steam Electric Station (SSES), Units 1 and 2, license renewal application (LRA).
D-RAI 4.2.1-1 Section 4.2.1 of the Susquehanna LRA, "Neutron Fluence," provides the calculated reactor pressure vessel (RPV) beltline fluence values at 54 effective full power years (EFPY) for both
 
units. Please confirm that this fluence calculation is consistent with that associated with the
 
current pressure-temperature (P-T) limits, valid for 35.7 EFPY for Unit 1 and 30.2 EFPY for


Unit 2. Provide the fluence values and approximate expiration dates corresponding to these
ML072360232 OFFICE      PM:RLRA:DLR            LA:DLR                BC:RLRA:DLR NAME        EGettys                SFigueroa              LLund DATE        09/4/07                09/06/07              09/07/07 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS AUGUST 23, 2007 PARTICIPANTS                          AFFILIATIONS Evelyn Gettys                        U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Simon Sheng                          NRC Duane Filchner                        PPL Susquehanna, LLC (PPL)
Jeff Weik                            PPL Mike Detamore                        PPL Enclosure 1


EFPYs for the current P-T limits.
DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION August 23, 2007 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PPL Susquehanna, LLC held a telephone conference call on August 23, 2007, to discuss and clarify the following draft requests for additional information (D-RAIs) concerning the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES), Units 1 and 2, license renewal application (LRA).
Discussion
D-RAI 4.2.1-1 Section 4.2.1 of the Susquehanna LRA, Neutron Fluence, provides the calculated reactor pressure vessel (RPV) beltline fluence values at 54 effective full power years (EFPY) for both units. Please confirm that this fluence calculation is consistent with that associated with the current pressure-temperature (P-T) limits, valid for 35.7 EFPY for Unit 1 and 30.2 EFPY for Unit 2. Provide the fluence values and approximate expiration dates corresponding to these EFPYs for the current P-T limits.
: The discussion between the staff and the applicant eliminated this D-RAI .
Discussion: The discussion between the staff and the applicant eliminated this D-RAI .
Therefore, this question is withdrawn and will not be sent as a formal RAI.
Therefore, this question is withdrawn and will not be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI 4.2.5-1 In the July 28, 1998, SER on BWRVIP-05, the NRC staff concluded that examination of the RPV circumferential shell welds would need to be performed if the corresponding volumetric
D-RAI 4.2.5-1 In the July 28, 1998, SER on BWRVIP-05, the NRC staff concluded that examination of the RPV circumferential shell welds would need to be performed if the corresponding volumetric examinations of the RPV axial shell welds revealed the presence of an age-related degradation mechanism. Confirm whether or not previous volumetric examinations of the RPV axial shell welds have shown any indication of cracking or other age-related degradation mechanisms in the welds. Please also confirm whether there are any flaw evaluations performed to date on RPV flaws as a result of previous volumetric examinations of the RPVs, and, if flaw evaluations exist, why they are not considered as TLAAs.
 
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
examinations of the RPV axial shell welds revealed the presence of an age-related degradation
D-RAI 4.7.3-1 LRA Section 4.7.3 states that, based on BWRVIP-25, BWR Core Plate Inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines, the core plate hold-down bolts will have at least 81-percent preload remaining at 54 EFPY and, based on the GE extended power uprate (EPU) analyses of the core plate hold-down bolts, the preload at the end of 60 years would be adequate to prevent lateral motion of the core plate for the period of extended operation. This conclusion is not supported by any Susquehanna plant-specific evaluation. Please provide the following additional information:
 
Enclosure 2
mechanism. Confirm whether or not previous vo lumetric examinations of the RPV axial shell welds have shown any indication of cracking or other age-related degradation mechanisms in
 
the welds. Please also confirm whether there are any flaw evaluations performed to date on
 
RPV flaws as a result of previous volumetric ex aminations of the RPVs, and, if flaw evaluations exist, why they are not considered as TLAAs.
Discussion
: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI 4.7.3-1 LRA Section 4.7.3 states that, based on BWRVIP-25, "BWR Core Plate Inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines," the core plate hold-down bolts will have at least 81-percent preload
 
remaining at 54 EFPY and, based on the GE extended power uprate (EPU) analyses of the core
 
plate hold-down bolts, the preload at the end of 60 years would be adequate to prevent lateral
 
motion of the core plate for the period of extended operation. This conclusion is not supported
 
by any Susquehanna plant-specific evaluation. Please provide the following additional
 
information:       (1)  Demonstrate the applicability of the BWRVIP-25 loss of preload analysis to the Susquehanna units. Identify the temperature of the bolts during the normal
 
operation and the projected bolt neutron fluence at the end of the period of
 
extended operation for the Susquehanna units. Provide a plant-specific evaluation
 
demonstrating that the loss of preload due to stress relaxation for the
 
Susquehanna RPV core plate hold-down bolts is bounded by the value of 19
 
percent from Appendix B of BWRVIP-25.
 
    (2)Perform a plant-specific core plate hold-down bolt analysis using the BWRVIP-25 Appendix A methodology, demonstrating that the axial and bending stresses for
 
the mean and highest loaded hold-down bolts will not exceed the American Society
 
of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III allowable
 
stresses for P m (primary membrane) and P m + P b (primary membrane plus bending) as a result of a plant-specific reduction in the bolt preload at the end of the
 
extended period of operation. State clearly the assumptions on which the plant-
 
specific analysis was based.      (3)Provide sufficient information regarding the "GE EPU analyses" on the core plate hold-down bolts so that the staff can determine whether the Susquehanna
 
hold-down bolts are adequate to prevent lateral motion of the core plate for the
 
period of extended operation.
Discussion
:  The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI 4.7.3-2 LRA Appendix C discussed the applicant's response to BWRVIP report application action items.
The majority of these BWRVIP reports are related to degradation of the structural integrity of
 
austenitic stainless steel RPV internals due to irradiation assisted stress corrosion cracking, and
 
the associated BWRVIP application action items require evaluation of TLAA for these RPV
 
internals for the period of extended operation. Except for a couple of cases, the LRA
 
plant-specific responses to these BWRVIP reports do not address TLAA. Please address the
 
TLAA for RPV internals discussed in the Appendix C and demonstrate that the Susquehanna
 
RPV internals are bounded by these BWRVIP reports. For the Susquehanna RPV internals
 
which are not bounded by these BWRVIP reports, discuss any additional programs and
 
activities to be implemented in the extended period of operation so that their TLAAs will be
 
acceptable. Further, perform a similar evaluation for Susquehanna RPV core shrouds, referencing BWRVIP-76, "Boiling Water Reactor Core Shroud Inspection and Flaw Evaluation
 
Guidelines."
Discussion
:  Based on the discussion with the applicant, the staff agreed to revise this question as follows. The revised question will be sent as a formal RAI. RAI 4.7.3-2 LRA Appendix C discussed the applicant's response to BWRVIP report application action items.
The BWRVIP reports addressing the TLAA regarding irradiation assisted stress corrosion
 
cracking (IASCC) in austenitic stainless steel RPV internals are BWRVIP-25, BWRVIP-26-A, "BWR Top Guide Inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines," BWRVIP-76, "BWR Core Shroud
 
Inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines," and BWRVIP-47-A, "BWR Lower Plenum
 
Inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines."  Although managing TLAA using aging
 
management programs or other measures is stat ed in Appendix C in your response to BWRVIP report application action items, IASCC in austenitic stainless steel RPV internals should be
 
discussed in the TLAA section to build the connection between LRA Section 4.0 and Appendix


C. Further, the fact that BWRVIP-47 is under the NRC staff review doesn't imply that you don't
(1)      Demonstrate the applicability of the BWRVIP-25 loss of preload analysis to the Susquehanna units. Identify the temperature of the bolts during the normal operation and the projected bolt neutron fluence at the end of the period of extended operation for the Susquehanna units. Provide a plant-specific evaluation demonstrating that the loss of preload due to stress relaxation for the Susquehanna RPV core plate hold-down bolts is bounded by the value of 19 percent from Appendix B of BWRVIP-25.
 
(2)        Perform a plant-specific core plate hold-down bolt analysis using the BWRVIP-25 Appendix A methodology, demonstrating that the axial and bending stresses for the mean and highest loaded hold-down bolts will not exceed the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III allowable stresses for Pm (primary membrane) and Pm + Pb (primary membrane plus bending) as a result of a plant-specific reduction in the bolt preload at the end of the extended period of operation. State clearly the assumptions on which the plant-specific analysis was based.
need to address it. In addition to your plant-specific evaluation using BWRVIP-76, you need to
(3)      Provide sufficient information regarding the GE EPU analyses on the core plate hold-down bolts so that the staff can determine whether the Susquehanna hold-down bolts are adequate to prevent lateral motion of the core plate for the period of extended operation.
 
Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.
make a commitment to follow all BWRVIP-76 requirements and limitations, as adjusted by the
D-RAI 4.7.3-2 LRA Appendix C discussed the applicants response to BWRVIP report application action items.
 
The majority of these BWRVIP reports are related to degradation of the structural integrity of austenitic stainless steel RPV internals due to irradiation assisted stress corrosion cracking, and the associated BWRVIP application action items require evaluation of TLAA for these RPV internals for the period of extended operation. Except for a couple of cases, the LRA plant-specific responses to these BWRVIP reports do not address TLAA. Please address the TLAA for RPV internals discussed in the Appendix C and demonstrate that the Susquehanna RPV internals are bounded by these BWRVIP reports. For the Susquehanna RPV internals which are not bounded by these BWRVIP reports, discuss any additional programs and activities to be implemented in the extended period of operation so that their TLAAs will be acceptable. Further, perform a similar evaluation for Susquehanna RPV core shrouds, referencing BWRVIP-76, Boiling Water Reactor Core Shroud Inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines.
NRC staff's safety evaluation on the BWRVIP-76 report.
Discussion: Based on the discussion with the applicant, the staff agreed to revise this question as follows. The revised question will be sent as a formal RAI.
Letter to PPL Susquehanna, from E. Gettys dated September 7, 2007  
RAI 4.7.3-2 LRA Appendix C discussed the applicants response to BWRVIP report application action items.
The BWRVIP reports addressing the TLAA regarding irradiation assisted stress corrosion cracking (IASCC) in austenitic stainless steel RPV internals are BWRVIP-25, BWRVIP-26-A, BWR Top Guide Inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines, BWRVIP-76, BWR Core Shroud Inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines, and BWRVIP-47-A, BWR Lower Plenum Inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines. Although managing TLAA using aging management programs or other measures is stated in Appendix C in your response to BWRVIP report application action items, IASCC in austenitic stainless steel RPV internals should be discussed in the TLAA section to build the connection between LRA Section 4.0 and Appendix C. Further, the fact that BWRVIP-47 is under the NRC staff review doesnt imply that you dont need to address it. In addition to your plant-specific evaluation using BWRVIP-76, you need to make a commitment to follow all BWRVIP-76 requirements and limitations, as adjusted by the NRC staffs safety evaluation on the BWRVIP-76 report.
Letter to PPL Susquehanna, from E. Gettys dated September 7, 2007


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON AUGUST 23, 2007, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY                    
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON AUGUST 23, 2007, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PPL SUSQUEHANNA, LLC, CONCERNING DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION DISTRIBUTION:
 
HARD COPY:
COMMISSION AND PPL SUSQUEHANNA, LLC, CONCERNING DRAFT              
DLR RF E-MAIL:
 
PUBLIC SSmith (srs3)
REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE                  
SDuraiswamy RidsNrrDlr RidsNrrDlrRlra RidsNrrDlrRlrb RidsNrrDlrRlrc RidsNrrDlrReba RidsNrrDlrRebb RidsNrrDci RidsNrrDra RidsNrrDe RidsNrrDeEemb RidsNrrDeEeeb RidsNrrDss RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrAdes YDiaz RGuzman BRogers EGettys
 
SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, LICENSE            
 
RENEWAL APPLICATION DISTRIBUTION
: HARD COPY: DLR RF E-MAIL: PUBLIC SSmith (srs3)
 
SDuraiswamy
 
RidsNrrDlr
 
RidsNrrDlrRlra
 
RidsNrrDlrRlrb
 
RidsNrrDlrRlrc
 
RidsNrrDlrReba
 
RidsNrrDlrRebb
 
RidsNrrDci
 
RidsNrrDra
 
RidsNrrDe RidsNrrDeEemb
 
RidsNrrDeEeeb
 
RidsNrrDss
 
RidsOgcMailCenter
 
RidsNrrAdes
 
---------------
 
YDiaz RGuzman BRogers EGettys Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 cc: Robert A. Saccone Vice President - Nuclear Operations
 
PPL Susquehanna, LLC
 
769 Salem Blvd., NUCSB3
 
Berwick, PA  18603-0467 Terry L. Harpster General Manager - Plant Support
 
PPL Susquehanna, LLC
 
769 Salem Blvd., NUCSA4
 
Berwick, PA  18603-0467 Rocco R. Sgarro Manager - Nuclear Regulatory Affairs
 
PPL Susquehanna, LLC
 
Two North Ninth Street, GENPL4
 
Allentown, PA  18101-1179 Walter E. Morrissey Supervising Engineer
 
Nuclear Regulatory Affairs
 
PPL Susquehanna, LLC
 
769 Salem Blvd., NUCSA4
 
Berwick, PA  18603-0467 Michael H. Crowthers Supervising Engineer
 
Nuclear Regulatory Affairs
 
PPL Susquehanna, LLC
 
Two North Ninth Street, GENPL4
 
Allentown, PA  18101-1179 Steven M. Cook Manager - Quality Assurance
 
PPL Susquehanna, LLC
 
769 Salem Blvd., NUCSB2
 
Berwick, PA  18603-0467 Luis A. Ramos Community Relations Manager,       
 
Susquehanna
 
PPL Susquehanna, LLC
 
634 Salem Blvd., SSO
 
Berwick, PA  18603-0467 Bryan A. Snapp, Esq.
Associate General Counsel
 
PPL Services Corporation
 
Two North Ninth Street, GENTW3
 
Allentown, PA  18101-1179 Supervisor - Document Control Services PPL Susquehanna, LLC
 
Two North Ninth Street, GENPL4
 
Allentown, PA  18101-1179 Richard W. Osborne Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc.
 
212 Locust Street
 
P.O. Box 1266
 
Harrisburg, PA  17108-1266 Director, Bureau of Radiation Protection Pennsylvania Department of
 
Environmental Protection
 
Rachel Carson State Office Building
 
P.O. Box 8469
 
Harrisburg, PA  17105-8469 Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
 
P.O. Box 35, NUCSA4
 
Berwick, PA  18603-0035 Regional Administrator, Region 1 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
 
475 Allendale Road
 
King of Prussia, PA  19406 Board of Supervisors Salem Township
 
P.O. Box 405
 
Berwick, PA  18603-0035 Dr. Judith Johnsrud National Energy Committee
 
Sierra Club
 
443 Orlando Avenue
 
State College, PA  16803 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:-2-Ms. Julie Keys Nuclear Energy Institute


1776 I Street, NW, Suite 400
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:
Robert A. Saccone                    Bryan A. Snapp, Esq.
Vice President - Nuclear Operations  Associate General Counsel PPL Susquehanna, LLC                PPL Services Corporation 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSB3              Two North Ninth Street, GENTW3 Berwick, PA 18603-0467              Allentown, PA 18101-1179 Terry L. Harpster                    Supervisor - Document Control Services General Manager - Plant Support      PPL Susquehanna, LLC PPL Susquehanna, LLC                Two North Ninth Street, GENPL4 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSA4              Allentown, PA 18101-1179 Berwick, PA 18603-0467 Richard W. Osborne Rocco R. Sgarro                      Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Manager - Nuclear Regulatory Affairs 212 Locust Street PPL Susquehanna, LLC                P.O. Box 1266 Two North Ninth Street, GENPL4      Harrisburg, PA 17108-1266 Allentown, PA 18101-1179 Director, Bureau of Radiation Protection Walter E. Morrissey                  Pennsylvania Department of Supervising Engineer                  Environmental Protection Nuclear Regulatory Affairs          Rachel Carson State Office Building PPL Susquehanna, LLC                P.O. Box 8469 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSA4              Harrisburg, PA 17105-8469 Berwick, PA 18603-0467 Senior Resident Inspector Michael H. Crowthers                U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Supervising Engineer                P.O. Box 35, NUCSA4 Nuclear Regulatory Affairs          Berwick, PA 18603-0035 PPL Susquehanna, LLC Two North Ninth Street, GENPL4      Regional Administrator, Region 1 Allentown, PA 18101-1179            U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road Steven M. Cook                      King of Prussia, PA 19406 Manager - Quality Assurance PPL Susquehanna, LLC                Board of Supervisors 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSB2              Salem Township Berwick, PA 18603-0467              P.O. Box 405 Berwick, PA 18603-0035 Luis A. Ramos Community Relations Manager,        Dr. Judith Johnsrud Susquehanna                        National Energy Committee PPL Susquehanna, LLC                Sierra Club 634 Salem Blvd., SSO                443 Orlando Avenue Berwick, PA 18603-0467              State College, PA 16803


Washington, DC 20006-3708}}
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:
Ms. Julie Keys Nuclear Energy Institute 1776 I Street, NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006-3708}}

Latest revision as of 12:18, 13 March 2020

Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on August 23, 2007, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and PPL Susquehanna, LLC, Concerning Draft Requests for Additional Information Pertaining to the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station
ML072360232
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/07/2007
From: Gettys E
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRA
To:
Susquehanna
Gettys Evelyn, NRR/DLR/RLRA 415-4029
References
Download: ML072360232 (10)


Text

September 7, 2007 LICENSEE: PPL Susquehanna, LLC FACILITY: Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON AUGUST 23, 2007, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PPL SUSQUEHANNA, LLC, CONCERNING DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PPL Susquehanna, LLC held a telephone conference call on August 23, 2007, to discuss and clarify the staffs draft requests for additional information (D-RAIs) concerning the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2, license renewal application. The telephone conference call was useful in clarifying the intent of the staffs D-RAIs. provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a listing of the D-RAIs discussed with the applicant, including a brief description on the status of the items.

The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.

/RA/

Evelyn Gettys, Project Manager License Renewal Branch A Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388

Enclosures:

As stated cc w/encls: See next page

ML072360232 OFFICE PM:RLRA:DLR LA:DLR BC:RLRA:DLR NAME EGettys SFigueroa LLund DATE 09/4/07 09/06/07 09/07/07 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS AUGUST 23, 2007 PARTICIPANTS AFFILIATIONS Evelyn Gettys U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Simon Sheng NRC Duane Filchner PPL Susquehanna, LLC (PPL)

Jeff Weik PPL Mike Detamore PPL Enclosure 1

DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION August 23, 2007 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PPL Susquehanna, LLC held a telephone conference call on August 23, 2007, to discuss and clarify the following draft requests for additional information (D-RAIs) concerning the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES), Units 1 and 2, license renewal application (LRA).

D-RAI 4.2.1-1 Section 4.2.1 of the Susquehanna LRA, Neutron Fluence, provides the calculated reactor pressure vessel (RPV) beltline fluence values at 54 effective full power years (EFPY) for both units. Please confirm that this fluence calculation is consistent with that associated with the current pressure-temperature (P-T) limits, valid for 35.7 EFPY for Unit 1 and 30.2 EFPY for Unit 2. Provide the fluence values and approximate expiration dates corresponding to these EFPYs for the current P-T limits.

Discussion: The discussion between the staff and the applicant eliminated this D-RAI .

Therefore, this question is withdrawn and will not be sent as a formal RAI.

D-RAI 4.2.5-1 In the July 28, 1998, SER on BWRVIP-05, the NRC staff concluded that examination of the RPV circumferential shell welds would need to be performed if the corresponding volumetric examinations of the RPV axial shell welds revealed the presence of an age-related degradation mechanism. Confirm whether or not previous volumetric examinations of the RPV axial shell welds have shown any indication of cracking or other age-related degradation mechanisms in the welds. Please also confirm whether there are any flaw evaluations performed to date on RPV flaws as a result of previous volumetric examinations of the RPVs, and, if flaw evaluations exist, why they are not considered as TLAAs.

Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.

D-RAI 4.7.3-1 LRA Section 4.7.3 states that, based on BWRVIP-25, BWR Core Plate Inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines, the core plate hold-down bolts will have at least 81-percent preload remaining at 54 EFPY and, based on the GE extended power uprate (EPU) analyses of the core plate hold-down bolts, the preload at the end of 60 years would be adequate to prevent lateral motion of the core plate for the period of extended operation. This conclusion is not supported by any Susquehanna plant-specific evaluation. Please provide the following additional information:

Enclosure 2

(1) Demonstrate the applicability of the BWRVIP-25 loss of preload analysis to the Susquehanna units. Identify the temperature of the bolts during the normal operation and the projected bolt neutron fluence at the end of the period of extended operation for the Susquehanna units. Provide a plant-specific evaluation demonstrating that the loss of preload due to stress relaxation for the Susquehanna RPV core plate hold-down bolts is bounded by the value of 19 percent from Appendix B of BWRVIP-25.

(2) Perform a plant-specific core plate hold-down bolt analysis using the BWRVIP-25 Appendix A methodology, demonstrating that the axial and bending stresses for the mean and highest loaded hold-down bolts will not exceed the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III allowable stresses for Pm (primary membrane) and Pm + Pb (primary membrane plus bending) as a result of a plant-specific reduction in the bolt preload at the end of the extended period of operation. State clearly the assumptions on which the plant-specific analysis was based.

(3) Provide sufficient information regarding the GE EPU analyses on the core plate hold-down bolts so that the staff can determine whether the Susquehanna hold-down bolts are adequate to prevent lateral motion of the core plate for the period of extended operation.

Discussion: The applicant indicated that the question is clear. This D-RAI will be sent as a formal RAI.

D-RAI 4.7.3-2 LRA Appendix C discussed the applicants response to BWRVIP report application action items.

The majority of these BWRVIP reports are related to degradation of the structural integrity of austenitic stainless steel RPV internals due to irradiation assisted stress corrosion cracking, and the associated BWRVIP application action items require evaluation of TLAA for these RPV internals for the period of extended operation. Except for a couple of cases, the LRA plant-specific responses to these BWRVIP reports do not address TLAA. Please address the TLAA for RPV internals discussed in the Appendix C and demonstrate that the Susquehanna RPV internals are bounded by these BWRVIP reports. For the Susquehanna RPV internals which are not bounded by these BWRVIP reports, discuss any additional programs and activities to be implemented in the extended period of operation so that their TLAAs will be acceptable. Further, perform a similar evaluation for Susquehanna RPV core shrouds, referencing BWRVIP-76, Boiling Water Reactor Core Shroud Inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines.

Discussion: Based on the discussion with the applicant, the staff agreed to revise this question as follows. The revised question will be sent as a formal RAI.

RAI 4.7.3-2 LRA Appendix C discussed the applicants response to BWRVIP report application action items.

The BWRVIP reports addressing the TLAA regarding irradiation assisted stress corrosion cracking (IASCC) in austenitic stainless steel RPV internals are BWRVIP-25, BWRVIP-26-A, BWR Top Guide Inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines, BWRVIP-76, BWR Core Shroud Inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines, and BWRVIP-47-A, BWR Lower Plenum Inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines. Although managing TLAA using aging management programs or other measures is stated in Appendix C in your response to BWRVIP report application action items, IASCC in austenitic stainless steel RPV internals should be discussed in the TLAA section to build the connection between LRA Section 4.0 and Appendix C. Further, the fact that BWRVIP-47 is under the NRC staff review doesnt imply that you dont need to address it. In addition to your plant-specific evaluation using BWRVIP-76, you need to make a commitment to follow all BWRVIP-76 requirements and limitations, as adjusted by the NRC staffs safety evaluation on the BWRVIP-76 report.

Letter to PPL Susquehanna, from E. Gettys dated September 7, 2007

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON AUGUST 23, 2007, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PPL SUSQUEHANNA, LLC, CONCERNING DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION DISTRIBUTION:

HARD COPY:

DLR RF E-MAIL:

PUBLIC SSmith (srs3)

SDuraiswamy RidsNrrDlr RidsNrrDlrRlra RidsNrrDlrRlrb RidsNrrDlrRlrc RidsNrrDlrReba RidsNrrDlrRebb RidsNrrDci RidsNrrDra RidsNrrDe RidsNrrDeEemb RidsNrrDeEeeb RidsNrrDss RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrAdes YDiaz RGuzman BRogers EGettys

Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:

Robert A. Saccone Bryan A. Snapp, Esq.

Vice President - Nuclear Operations Associate General Counsel PPL Susquehanna, LLC PPL Services Corporation 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSB3 Two North Ninth Street, GENTW3 Berwick, PA 18603-0467 Allentown, PA 18101-1179 Terry L. Harpster Supervisor - Document Control Services General Manager - Plant Support PPL Susquehanna, LLC PPL Susquehanna, LLC Two North Ninth Street, GENPL4 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSA4 Allentown, PA 18101-1179 Berwick, PA 18603-0467 Richard W. Osborne Rocco R. Sgarro Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc.

Manager - Nuclear Regulatory Affairs 212 Locust Street PPL Susquehanna, LLC P.O. Box 1266 Two North Ninth Street, GENPL4 Harrisburg, PA 17108-1266 Allentown, PA 18101-1179 Director, Bureau of Radiation Protection Walter E. Morrissey Pennsylvania Department of Supervising Engineer Environmental Protection Nuclear Regulatory Affairs Rachel Carson State Office Building PPL Susquehanna, LLC P.O. Box 8469 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSA4 Harrisburg, PA 17105-8469 Berwick, PA 18603-0467 Senior Resident Inspector Michael H. Crowthers U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Supervising Engineer P.O. Box 35, NUCSA4 Nuclear Regulatory Affairs Berwick, PA 18603-0035 PPL Susquehanna, LLC Two North Ninth Street, GENPL4 Regional Administrator, Region 1 Allentown, PA 18101-1179 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road Steven M. Cook King of Prussia, PA 19406 Manager - Quality Assurance PPL Susquehanna, LLC Board of Supervisors 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSB2 Salem Township Berwick, PA 18603-0467 P.O. Box 405 Berwick, PA 18603-0035 Luis A. Ramos Community Relations Manager, Dr. Judith Johnsrud Susquehanna National Energy Committee PPL Susquehanna, LLC Sierra Club 634 Salem Blvd., SSO 443 Orlando Avenue Berwick, PA 18603-0467 State College, PA 16803

Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:

Ms. Julie Keys Nuclear Energy Institute 1776 I Street, NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006-3708