ML17345B061: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 04/29/1983 | | issue date = 04/29/1983 | ||
| title = Forwards Third Radiological Progress Rept for Steam Generator Repair Program | | title = Forwards Third Radiological Progress Rept for Steam Generator Repair Program | ||
| author name = | | author name = Uhrig R | ||
| author affiliation = FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. | | author affiliation = FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = Varga S | ||
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION (NRR) | | addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION (NRR) | ||
| docket = 05000251 | | docket = 05000251 | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:i | {{#Wiki_filter:I i | ||
'S EM ('RIDS)'ACCESSION,NBRt8305030166 DOC DATEt 83/04/ | 'REGULATOR NFORMATION DISTRIBUTION 'S EM ('RIDS) | ||
NO DOCKET¹'FAGIL;.50 | 'ACCESSION,NBRt8305030166 DOC DATEt 83/04/29 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET ¹ | ||
'251 tTur key Po'fnt 1Pl anti',Uni;t | 'FAGIL;.50 '251 tTur key Po'fnt 1Pl anti ',Uni;t 0i Florida IPower -and Light "C 05000251 | ||
'UHRIGiR,E,:F 1 or ida iPower I Light Co, GREC IP~NAME REC IP IENT.'AF F IL' | 'AUTH ~ NAME AUTHOR 'AFFILIATION | ||
'UHRIGiR,E,:F 1 or ida iPower I Light Co, GREC IP ~ NAME REC IP IENT. 'AF F IL'IATION VARGAP'S,AB Operating Reactons Branch 1 1 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
.Forwards<<thir d radiological-'progress rept"for ssteam jgener ator irepair'r ograms" DISTRIBUTION | .Forwards <<thir d radiological-'progress rept"for ssteam jgener ator irepair'r ograms" DISTRIBUTION 'CODE: 'A001'0 )COPIES RECEIYED:I TR .$ 'lENCL .J " | ||
'CODE: 'A001'0)COPIES RECEIYED:I TR.$'lENCL.J" SIZE:.tTITLE t OR"Submi't ta 1: 1Gener a l Di st r | SIZE:. | ||
LTTR 25 ENCL 23 | tTITLE t OR "Submi't ta 1: 1Gener a l Di st r but i on i RECOPIES NOTES! | ||
RECIPIENT RECIPIENT iCOPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR 'ENCL ID CODE/NAME LT)TR ENCL NRR ORB1 BC 01 "7 7 INTiERNALt ELD/HDS4 1 0 NRR/DE/MTEB 1 1 NRR/DL DIR NRR/DL/ORAB 1 0 | |||
-DS- - ETB 1 1 NRR/DS I/RAB 1 | |||
.REG ILE OQ .1 1 RGN2 ~ 1 1 | |||
.EXTERNALs ACRS =09 l6 I 6 LPDR 03 | |||
'NRC:PDR *02'. 1 1 NSIC 05 NT I' 1 1 | |||
)TOTAL, NUMBER, OF'."COPIES'EQUIRED: LTTR 25 ENCL 23 | |||
( ~ ~ | |||
f* : ~'X p .~'i ii,'y' ~ )a 'I >, (Ii) l'3C' ( sp) ~ i , i,~ 'jl<< | |||
fi' T'" | |||
f f 4'>i i '% -~Q lg'>fg<)) 5 q $ e ~I I'as ll',,) A | |||
~-~ ll f ~ ir p I | |||
) k ill ls~X,JX ]pa i "'.)7 g$ .) l, I JL VIO~iilCi9' i~'il>90('>"3 1i f 'p g,>y pi (fill , g'4, ip $ 6 | |||
'l l, 4 1( | |||
If | |||
'r op~ a<>% e <<>> 'vv'a >n>a f@z<nr lvr<~oo f fiick )1 Uqgpgi vore<'$'D'1[~)Oq | |||
-3) q qE~'p 4'WOES'1 i']SE~i l') ~3 ~~TJ~<<'4yI g'3 gi> e", <W<yAg Pg5 (ih " ]ail<>',) i''l~~X Ki<l~>X'.<Ti~X(>> | |||
f39 f +g) 4 f fp f l1 gQ f '> | |||
Q f f'>g 4 f <'gJry h ~1 c 3T'JAN T ~3I'-)J 13'I <<".,] 7'V>~ fi~,]Y')7A,:-3'~ | |||
lJ,~.) )N X)>()~ .<X V l',]Q )l 1 l llew ~gQ, l'j "JQ'3) j I | |||
'y i'lJ tW )3fqgii)Q J i1QVi> f ~ | |||
Q(lpga;QigSl;l,% Of 4 ~Wg "<~X "~ ~ | |||
g lilt < | |||
E~ l~l | |||
);jC-] I ),')l 3l> ~ J]) '1)) )'f )(,g | |||
,4 fl', | |||
Pffft.'' | |||
f | |||
O. BOX 14000, JUNO BEACH, FL 33408 | |||
'sg FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY April 29, 1983 L-83-272 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch gl Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulat'ory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 | |||
== | ==Dear Mr . Varga:== | ||
I Re: Turkey Point Unit 4 Docket No. 50-251 Steam Generator Repair Program | |||
- Radiolo ical Pro ress Re ort - No. 3 Please find attached our thi"rd Radiological Progress Report for the Steam Generator Repair Program as required by Section 3.H.(2)(c) of DPR-41. | |||
Very truly yours, Robert E. Uhrig President 'ice Advanced Systems & Technology REU/PLP/cab Attachment cc: J. P. O'Reilly, Region II Harold F. Reis, Esquire 8305030ih8 8S0yg9 PDR IIIIDOCK R | |||
0500025i PDR.. ~ ... | |||
PEOPL'E... SERVING PEOPLE | |||
==5.0 CONCLUSION== | 0 I TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. | ||
S AND OBSERVATIONS TABLES TABLE 1 | 1.0 'NTRODUCTION 2.0 OCCUPATIONAL RADIATIONEXPOSURE 2.1 General 2.2 Description and Format of Exposure Data 2 2.3 Discussion of Exposure Results 3 3.0 APPLICATION OF DOSE REDUCTION TECHNIQUES (ALARA PRINCIPLES) 3.1 General 3.2 Contamination Control Envelopes and Ventilation 3.3 Installation of Steam Generator Lower Assemblies(SGLAs) 3.0 Welding of Steam Generator Divider Plates 3.5 Reactor Head Preparation for Hot Functional Testing 5 3.6 General Techniques and Practices 5 0.0 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS AND SOLID WASTE 0.1 General 0.2 Liquid Releases 6 0.3 Airborne Releases 0.0 Solid Radioactive Waste | ||
==5.0 CONCLUSION== | |||
S AND OBSERVATIONS TABLES TABLE 1 Description of Major Tasks 9 TABLE 2 Personnel Exposure Summary - Per Task 11 TABLE 3A Summary of Preparatory Activity Exposures 13 TABLE 3B Summary of Removal Activity Exposures 16 TABLE 3C Summary of Installation Activity Exposures 19 TABLE 3D Summary of Post-Installation Activity Exposures 21 TABLE 0 Personnel Exposure Summary - Per Phase 20 TABLE 5 Summary, of Radioactive Effluent Releases 25 TABLE 6 Summary of Solid Low Level Radioactive Waste Shipments 28 | |||
==1.0 INTRODUCTION== | ==1.0 INTRODUCTION== | ||
Radiological Progress Report No.3 contains information pertaining to the radiological aspects of the Unit 0 Steam Generator Repair Program (SGRP)for the period February 3, 1983 through March 30, 1983.This information includes the following: | Radiological Progress Report No. 3 contains information pertaining to the radiological aspects of the Unit 0 Steam Generator Repair Program (SGRP) for the period February 3, 1983 through March 30, 1983. This information includes the following: | ||
a.An assessment and summary of the occupational exposure and labor expended for each reporting period (throughout the project).b.An evaluation of the effectiveness of dose reduction techniques (ALARA principles). | : a. An assessment and summary of the occupational exposure and labor expended for each reporting period (throughout the project). | ||
: b. An evaluation of the effectiveness of dose reduction techniques (ALARA principles). F | |||
d.An estimate of the solid radioactive waste generated including volume and radioactive content.Significant project.tasks performed during this reporting period included: 1.Removal of steam generator transfer bridge.2.Installation of main steam and feedwatez piping.3.Complete installation of steam generator upper and lower assemblies. | : c. An estimate of the radioactivity released in liquid and airborne effluents. | ||
: d. An estimate of the solid radioactive waste generated including volume and radioactive content. | |||
Significant project. tasks performed during this reporting period included: | |||
: 1. Removal of steam generator transfer bridge. | |||
: 2. Installation of main steam and feedwatez piping. | |||
: 3. Complete installation of steam generator upper and lower assemblies. | |||
Welding of steam generator divider plates. | |||
5. | |||
/ | |||
Inspection and close-out of'steam generators in preparation for testing. | |||
l | |||
: 6. Installation of insulation on steam genet ators. | |||
: 7. Installation of miscellaneous piping in,steam generator cubicles. | |||
: 8. Installation of miscellaneous steel. | |||
: 9. Installation of reactor coolant pump motors. | |||
: 10. Installation of emergency containment coo'lers, control rod drive mechanism coolers and fans. | |||
: 11. Installation of concrete stop logs, concrete forms, rebar and pouring of new concrete. | |||
: 12. Preparation for and conducting of hot functional testing. | |||
: 13. Cleanup activities (removal of scaffolding and support equipment, removal of temporary shielding). | |||
Several on-going activities also performed during this period included: cleanup and decontamination,'aintenance of temporary electrical power and lighting services, surveillance of temporary shielding, health physics support and project supervision. | Several on-going activities also performed during this period included: cleanup and decontamination,'aintenance of temporary electrical power and lighting services, surveillance of temporary shielding, health physics support and project supervision. | ||
I 2.0 OCCUPATIONAL RADIATIONEXPOSURE 2.1 General As indicated in Radiological Progress Report No. 1, occupational exposure to radiation may'e considered the major radiological impact of the SGRP. The program developed to collect exposure information and provide accurate " | |||
assessments of tasks performed is discussed in detail in Section 2.1 2.3 of Radiological Progress Report No. 1. This program was utilized throughout this reporting period. -A description of the thirteen (13) major tas'<s .", indicated in Table 1. | |||
The following comments are provided for clarification and should be considered when reviewing the data presented in Table 2.ao | 2.2 Descri tion and Format of Ex osure Data Table 2 presents a summary of the occupational radiation exposure expended in person-rem and the labor expended in the radiation field in person-hours through this reporting period (i.e., from project commencement on 10 October 1982 to 30 March 1983).+ Also included are the original estimated expenditures. The following comments are provided for clarification and should be considered when reviewing the data presented in Table 2. | ||
This summary includes both the labor and exposure expenditures and the original estimated expenditures. | ao Several activities performed during the repair effort which were not described in Table 1 have been appropriately placed into one of the major task categories in Table 2 and accordingly accounted for. | ||
These tables list a more detailed breakdown of specific job activities which have been incorporated into+Self-reading pocket dosimeter (SRPD)results are used to report person-rem since exposure information is immediately available upon exit from the RCA and accordingly recorded in the computer data base.Since thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD's)are processed primarily on a monthly basis this information could not be readily incorporated into the exposure expended for each specific activity.Historically, SRPD results are higher than TLD results primarily due to drift (caused by factors such as heat and humidity, and initial charging). | : b. Exposures received by certain pre-identified personnel (e.g., health physics, QC/QA, etc.) performing functions not directly attributable to any one task are listed separately in Item 7. | ||
Therefore, accumulated dose is reported conservatively. | Co Information detailing exposures reported for specific activities within a major task is contained in the data base. This information is utilized to "track" exposure for the time period of interest. | ||
: d. Task items indicating no accumulated exposures have not commenced during this reporting period. | |||
A detailed summary of the personnel exposure expended through this reporting period for preparatory, removal, installation and post-installation activities is presented in Tables 3A, 3B, 3C and 3D respectively. This summary includes both the labor and exposure expenditures and the original estimated expenditures. These tables list a more detailed breakdown of specific job activities which have been incorporated into | |||
+Self-reading pocket dosimeter (SRPD) results are used to report person-rem since exposure information is immediately available upon exit from the RCA and accordingly recorded in the computer data base. Since thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD's) are processed primarily on a monthly basis this information could not be readily incorporated into the exposure expended for each specific activity. | |||
Historically, SRPD results are higher than TLD results primarily due to drift (caused by factors such as heat and humidity, and initial charging). Therefore, accumulated dose is reported conservatively. | |||
0 g | |||
the appropriate major task descriptions listed in Table 2. Table 0 presents a general summary of both labor and personnel exposure expended for each phase of the repair project. with the original estimated expenditures. 'The following comments are provided for clarification and should be considered when reviewing the data presented in Tables 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D and 0. | |||
of Ex osure Results A review of the data presented in Table 2 shows that the total occupational radiation exposure recorded for all major tasks is approximately 60%of the original total estimate.Table 2 actual exposures are recorded by computer acquisition as discussed in Progress Report No..l.Table 2 includes all exposure expended through March 30, 1983 and will continue to be used for accumulation of all personnel exposures through project completion. | ao Activity status indications are given to allow comparison of actual versus estimated person-rem expenditures. | ||
The exposure expended to date is primarily attributed to repair project preparator'y, removal, installation and post-installation activities as indicated in', Tables 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D and 0.As discussed in Progress Report No.2, Tables:3A and 3B.show that the total actual exposure expended for preparatory and removal phase activities was approximately 5196 less than the total estimated exposures for those activities. | : b. Activities indicated as in progress may require additional exposure prior to completion of the activity; therefore, a valid comparison't this time is not justified. | ||
Table 3C shows that the total occupational exposure accumulated for installation phase activities gras approximately 563 person-rem as compared to the original exposure estimate of 600 person-rem. | Co For completed activities, it should be noted that a small amount of additional exposure and labor may appear sometime after completion is indicated, as a result of such factors as: field changes to procedures, work involving activity related to support equipment, localized work area cleanup, etc. | ||
The exposure attributed to steam generator lower assembly installation (approximately 227 person-rem) was greater than the estimate of approximately 200 person-rem (item 2 and 3 of Table 3C).The exposure attributed to welding steam generator divider plates (approximately 59 person-rem) was significantly higher than the estimate of 15 person-rem (item 0 of Table 3C).Table 3D shows that the total occupational exposure accumulated for post-installation phase activities in progress is approximately 56 person-rem as compared to the original exposure estimate of 141 person-rem. | : d. Some activities were not estimated in the SGRR and have no estimated labor and values indicated. These activities are controlled by RWP's which have 'xposure an exposure estimate for the activity for purposes of exposure "tracking". | ||
The information for all phase activities in progress or completed (as shown in Tables 3A, 3B, 3C and 3D)is summarized in Table 0.The total exposure expended during this reporting period was approximately 367 person-rem. | 2.3 Discussion of Ex osure Results A review of the data presented in Table 2 shows that the total occupational radiation exposure recorded for all major tasks is approximately 60% of the original total estimate. Table 2 actual exposures are recorded by computer acquisition as discussed in Progress Report No..l. Table 2 includes all exposure expended through March 30, 1983 and will continue to be used for accumulation of all personnel exposures through project completion. The exposure expended to date is primarily attributed to repair project preparator'y, removal, installation and post-installation activities as indicated in', Tables 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D and 0. | ||
As discussed in Progress Report No. 2, Tables:3A and 3B.show that the total actual exposure expended for preparatory and removal phase activities was approximately 5196 less than the total estimated exposures for those activities. | |||
Table 3C shows that the total occupational exposure accumulated for installation phase activities gras approximately 563 person-rem as compared to the original exposure estimate of 600 person-rem. The exposure attributed to steam generator lower assembly installation (approximately 227 person-rem) was greater than the estimate of approximately 200 person-rem (item 2 and 3 of Table 3C). The exposure attributed to welding steam generator divider plates (approximately 59 person-rem) was significantly higher than the estimate of 15 person-rem (item 0 of Table 3C). | |||
Table 3D shows that the total occupational exposure accumulated for post-installation phase activities in progress is approximately 56 person-rem as compared to the original exposure estimate of 141 person-rem. | |||
The information for all phase activities in progress or completed (as shown in Tables 3A, 3B, 3C and 3D) is summarized in Table 0. The total exposure expended during this reporting period was approximately 367 person-rem. | |||
3.0 APPLICATION OF DOSE REDUCTION TECHNI UES (ALARA PRINCIPLES) 3.1 General This section discusses the techniques and practices which have been effective in providing dose reductions to personnel during the reporting period. Where available data permits, the following evaluations include a quantitative assessment of the person-rem savings which can be attributed to the techniques use/a 3.2 Contamination Control Envelo es and Ventilation Enclosures for contamination control and a filtered ventilation system were utilized during installation of the steam generator lower assemblies which included divider plate welding. Welding and other operations associated with steam generator lower assembly installation resulted in low-level airborne radioactivity which was effectively controlled with the filtered ventilation system. At times, particularly during divider plate welding, it was necessary to install the filtered exhaust ductwork in the channel head with the work crews to provide adequate ventilation in the work area. Contamination control enclosures were modified as needed to maximize channel head accessibility. These modifications assured positive personnel access control as well as controlling the spread of relatively higher levels of contamination to surrounding areas. | |||
OF DOSE REDUCTION TECHNI UES (ALARA PRINCIPLES) | 3.3 Installation of Steam Generator Lower Assemblies (SGLAs) | ||
Installation of the new SGLAs was completed during this reporting period. | |||
Exposure reduction techniques utilized for SGLA installation were discussed in Radiological Progress Report No. 2. | |||
The exposure expended for installation of the SGLAs was approximately 227 person-rem as compared to the estimate of approximately 200 person-rem (item 2 and 3 of Table 3C). Without the benefit of decontamination and channel head shielding, the exposure would be approximately 5675 person-rem. Thus a conservative exposure savings of approximately 5450 person-rem was realized. | |||
3.0 Weldin of Steam Generator Divider Plates Exposure reduction techniques similar to those techniques utilized during steam generator lower assembly installation (discussed in Radiological Progress Report No. 2) were employed during welding of the steam generator divider plates. | |||
These techniques included: | |||
aO Controlling access/egress to steam generator work platforms from outside the biological shield wall where dose rates are typically ten times less than dose rates inside the shield wall. | |||
: b. Using contamination enclosures on the work platforms to minimize airborne radioactivity and the spread of contamination to adjacent areas. | |||
Co Utilizing filtered ventilation ducting to exhaust low-level airborne radioactivity from the work area. | |||
: d. Use of channel head shielding whenever practical to reduce exposure rates during welding and repair operations. | |||
The exposure expended for installation of the steam generator divider plates was approximately 59 person-rem as compar'ed to the estimate of approximately 15 person-rem (item 0 of Table 3C). V/ithout the benefit of channel head shielding and decontamination, the exposure expended would be approximately 1500 person-rem. Thus, a conservative savings of 'approximately 1000 person-rem was realized. | |||
3.5 Reactor Head Pre aration for Hot Functional Testin Hot functional operations were in progress at the close of this reporting period. | |||
Certain pre-hot functional and post-hot functional testing activities will have the benefit of shielding. These activities include the following work on the reactor head: | |||
1; Installation and removal of instrument port conoseals. | |||
: 2. Detensioning and tensioning of the reactor head. | |||
: 3. Installation and removal of reactor head studs. | |||
A report on the exposure savings realized as a result of reactor head shielding will be discussed in a subsequent report when-all activities associated wittithe hot functional test are completed. | |||
. 3.6 General, Techni ues and Practices In addition to the assessment of dose reduction techniques described above, it is important to note some of the more general techniques 'and practices employed to maintain adequate control of personnel radiation exposure. These practices include the following: | |||
a) A comprehensive health physics program which includes an extensive training and radiological surveillance program. | |||
b) Use of repair project process sheets. | |||
c) Utilization of "in-containment" low-lev'el radiation waiting areas. | |||
d) Use of portable area radiation monitors to provide workers on the spot continuous exposure rate information. | |||
e) Ongoing decontamination and periodic work clean-up program. | |||
f) Use of continuous air samplers in addition to periodic grab samples. | |||
'g) Controlled access to containment tool cribs and weld rod rooms. A detailed description of these techniques and practices are discussed in Progress Report No. 1. | |||
I I h) Use of a cooler. system in the Reactor. Containment Building (RCB) to improve worker comfort. Although this system was not designed to cool the entire RCB, it significantly improved worke; comfort especially on the where a large majority of the work~ was scheduled. 58'levation A communications system used by Health Physics personnel and located in the vicinity of,each S/G enclosure to allow direct communication with the Health Physics Shift Supervisor. This system enables the health physics technician to maintain continuous communication with the shift supervisor thereby minimizing delays (and person-rem expended) on the job. | |||
j) Multi-badging for evaluation of personnel exposure for those tasks performed in relatively complex radiation fields. | |||
k) Use of temporary lead shielding in high occupancy/traffic areas. | |||
I) Increased frequency of TLD readouts for purposes of obtaining actual exposure information for personnel working in the S/G channel heads and other relatively high exposure areas. | |||
Quantitative assessments are difficult to develop for these "general" techniques and practices which contribute significantly to the overall ALARA commitment for the repair project. An update on these techniques and practices will be discussed in future reports. | |||
0.0 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS AND SOLID WASTE 0.1 General Radioactive effluents, comprised of liquid and airborne releases, and low-level solid radioactive waste produced during this reporting period and throughout the repair project to date are summarized in Tables 5 and 6 respectively. | |||
Laundry operations continue to be the major volume of liquid releases for the Unit 0 SGRP. As shown in Table 5 the composition of radioactive isotopes detected remain relatively unchanged from those detected during the previous period. Approximately 00% of the total activity released to date (excluding tritium) was in the form of activated metals (e.g. Co-58, Co-60, Mn-50, Ag-110m). The remaining activity (excluding tritium) included the following radionuclides: Cs-137 (21%), Cs-130 (11%), Cs-136 (0.3%) and radioiodines (28%). | |||
The total activity released (excluding tritium) to date is approximately 13% of the activity projected to be released for Unit No. 0 during the repair project (refer to Table 5.2-7 of the SGRR). The amount of tritium which has been released from SGRP activities, remains approximately 25% of the amount that was estimated'(Table 5.2-7 of the SGRR). | |||
0.3 Airborne Releases Airborne releases for this reporting period originated primarily from continuous ventilation of the containment during repair activities. A summary of airborne releases is shown in Table 5. The particulates detected are typical of | |||
radionuclides expected as a result of an extended shutdown. The total activity released to date that is attributed to repair project activities is approximately 18% of the total estimated activity projected to be released. | |||
0A Solid Radioactive Waste A summary of low level radioactive waste (LLW) shipments from Unit 0 during the reporting period is provided in Table 6. The amount of LLW which had been packaged but not shipped prior to the close of the period is also provided. The LLW shipments during this reporting period were made to both the Barnwell, South Carolina and Richland, Washington Low-Level Waste Disposal Facilities. | |||
The majority of the waste volume shipped was compactable and non-compactable dry active waste. | |||
The total volume of solid LLW generated due to repair project activities through this reporting period (excluding the SGLA's) is approximately 25% greater than the total volume estimated in the Gould Affidavit dated 3une 12, 1981. It should. | |||
be noted that the volume of waste shipped is less than the accumulated volume of waste generated. This can be primarily attributed to additional volume reduction techniques used prior to shipment, which are not accounted. for when initially generated. The total quantity of radioactivity shipped through this reporting period as a result of the Unit 0 SGRP was less than 09% of the activity estimated in the SGRR. The remaining LLW.generated is expected to be-expeditiously shipped to a licensed burial facility. | |||
The majority of the waste volume shipped was compactable and non-compactable dry active waste.The total volume of solid LLW generated due to repair project activities through this reporting period (excluding the SGLA's)is approximately 25%greater than the total volume estimated in the Gould Affidavit dated 3une 12, 1981.It should.be noted that the volume of waste shipped is less than the accumulated volume of waste generated. | |||
This can be primarily attributed to additional volume reduction techniques used prior to shipment, which are not accounted. | |||
for when initially generated. | |||
The total quantity of radioactivity shipped through this reporting period as a result of the Unit 0 SGRP was less than 09%of the activity estimated in the SGRR.The remaining LLW.generated is expected to be-expeditiously shipped to a licensed burial facility. | |||
==5.0 CONCLUSION== | ==5.0 CONCLUSION== | ||
S AND OBSERVATIONS The total exposure expended for installation phase activities was.approximately 563 person-rem as compared to the estimate of Qt0 person-rem. | S AND OBSERVATIONS The total exposure expended for installation phase activities was. approximately 563 person-rem as compared to the estimate of Qt0 person-rem. Approximately 51% (286 person-rem) of the total exposure expended during the installation phase was attributed to the installation of the SGLAs. | ||
Approximately 51%(286 person-rem) of the total exposure expended during the installation phase was attributed to the installation of the SGLAs.The exposure expended for post-installation, phase activities through this reporting period is approximately 56 person-rem as compared to the estimate of 101 person-rem. | The exposure expended for post-installation, phase activities through this reporting period is approximately 56 person-rem as compared to the estimate of 101 person-rem. As discussed in Section 2.2 of this report, several post-installation activities not originally estimated may result in the total exposure for the post-installation phase exceeding that estimate. The effect of these activities on the'otal exposure for the post-installation phase will be discussed in the next progress report. | ||
As discussed in Section 2.2 of this report, several post-installation activities not originally estimated may result in the total exposure for the post-installation phase exceeding that estimate.The effect of these activities on the'otal exposure for the post-installation phase will be discussed in the next progress report.Table 0 shows that the total labor expended to date is approximately 21%above the total labor estimate projected for the Unit 0 SGRP.With clean-up and post-hot functional activities remaining, it is projected that the total actual labor for the Unit 0 SGRP will be approximately 28%above that originally estimated. | Table 0 shows that the total labor expended to date is approximately 21% above the total labor estimate projected for the Unit 0 SGRP. With clean-up and post-hot functional activities remaining, it is projected that the total actual labor for the Unit 0 SGRP will be approximately 28% above that originally estimated. | ||
The total occupational radiation exposure expended to date is approximately 60%of the original total estimate.With project completion expected in early May, it is projected that the total exposure for the Unit 0 SGRP will be in the range of 1300 to 1000 person-rem. | The total occupational radiation exposure expended to date is approximately 60% | ||
This exposure range is approximately 33%to 38%lower than the original total estimate for the Unit 0 SGRP. | of the original total estimate. With project completion expected in early May, it is projected that the total exposure for the Unit 0 SGRP will be in the range of 1300 to 1000 person-rem. This exposure range is approximately 33% to 38% | ||
a) | lower than the original total estimate for the Unit 0 SGRP. | ||
c)Solid low level radioactive waste generated to date (excluding the SGLA's)for the Unit No.0 SGRP is approximately 25%greater than the estimate provided in the Gould Affidavit dated 3une 12, 1981.Some conservatism is employed in assigning the volume of waste generated to the Unit 0 SGRP even though some of the work was not directly related to the repair project.The total quantity of radioactivity shipped was below the activity estimated in the SGRR.Progress Report Number 0 will contain information from 30 March, 1983 through project completion (early May, 1983).This final report will also contain a summary for those tasks where the actual person-rem expended was significantly greater than the estimated values.This sumeKry will include a discussion of the lower expended exposure for the Unit 0 SGRP as compared to the Unit 3 SGRP and recommended changes in techniques and methods that should be evaluated to determine their effects on further reducing exposure for steam generator replacement | |||
-channel cut method. | a) Radioactive liquid effluents released are well within the total estimate projected to be released in Table 5.2-7 of the repair report. The calculated activity (excluding t'ritium) is approximately 13% while the tritium activity is approximately 25% of the total estimated activity in the SGRR. | ||
I | b) Airborne releases of radioactivity attributed to repair project activities are below the estimates provided in the SGRR. The activity associated with airborne releases for the remaining portion of the repair project is not expected to exceed the estimate indicated in the SGRR since the remaining work to be performed as a result of the SGRP includes primarily clean-up and post-hot functional activities. | ||
~~TABLE 1 DESCRIPTION OF MA3OR TASKS TASK TASK DESCRIPTION 1.Concrete and structural | c) Solid low level radioactive waste generated to date (excluding the SGLA's) for the Unit No. 0 SGRP is approximately 25% greater than the estimate provided in the Gould Affidavit dated 3une 12, 1981. Some conservatism is employed in assigning the volume of waste generated to the Unit 0 SGRP even though some of the work was not directly related to the repair project. The total quantity of radioactivity shipped was below the activity estimated in the SGRR. | ||
Progress Report Number 0 will contain information from 30 March, 1983 through project completion (early May, 1983). This final report will also contain a summary for those tasks where the actual person-rem expended was significantly greater than the estimated values. This sumeKry will include a discussion of the lower expended exposure for the Unit 0 SGRP as compared to the Unit 3 SGRP and recommended changes in techniques and methods that should be evaluated to determine their effects on further reducing exposure for steam generator replacement - channel cut method. | |||
5.This task includes general area decontamination of the containment prior to commencement of major work, continuous containment decontamination for the entire outage, and removal and~disposal of contaminated material for the entire outage. | |||
~~ | I | ||
~ | |||
~ | |||
TABLE 1 DESCRIPTION OF MA3OR TASKS TASK TASK DESCRIPTION | |||
: 1. Concrete and structural This task includes all work associated steel removal and with removal/replacement of concrete placement. and structural steel. Removal items include: Erection of scaffolding to remove piping and electrical components, cut/removal of the concrete shield wall above EL 58'nd the floor slab at EL 58', | |||
the concrete shield wall below EL 58', and removal of structural steel. Replacement items include: Installation of rebar and cadweld splices, erection of form work and shoring, concrete placement, and installation of structural steel. | |||
'2. Construction of pedestal 2. This task includes installation/removal of cranes, preparation of the pedestal crane foundations, assembly . | |||
polar crane, miscellaneous and erection of cranes and the polar crane cribbing platforms, S/G trolley,-and disassembly and removal of transfer bridge. cranes and the polar crane trolley. | |||
. 3. Removal, modification and 3. Items included in this task are: Erection/ | |||
reinstallation of S/G removal'.of scaffolding from El 58'o'l upper assemblies and 93', removal/installation of insulation major piping. and piping, upper'ssembly girth c'ut, cutting internal pipe and structural members inside the S/G, upper assembly modifications, and the upper assembly girth. weld. | |||
: 0. Construction of temporary The major exposure items in this task are: | |||
facilities and support Routing of welding leads, installation of services. temporary power for small tools and lighting in the area near the S/G (most will be inside the secondary shield wall between El 10'nd El 30'6"), and maintenance of temporary power and lighting for the entire outage. | |||
: 5. General decontamination and 5. This task includes general area disposal of contaminated decontamination of the containment prior materials/cleanup. to commencement of major work, continuous containment decontamination for the entire outage, and removal and | |||
~ | |||
disposal of contaminated material for the entire outage. | |||
~ | |||
~ | |||
10 TABLE 1 (continued) | 10 TABLE 1 (continued) | ||
DESCRIPTION OF MA3OR TASKS TASK 6.Re'moval and reinstallation | DESCRIPTION OF MA3OR TASKS TASK TASK DESCRIPTION | ||
: 6. Re'moval and reinstallation 6. This task includes removal of insulation of miscellaneous piping, from the steam generator and main steam equipment and insulation. and feedwater piping, installation of insulation on the new steam generators, and removal/installation of miscellaneous items. | |||
: 7. Non-manuals (e.g., QC, 7. The non-manual category includes health Engineers, HPs). physics, quality control, and engineering personnel, visitors, and Bechtel personnel required for the entire outage. | |||
S. Decontamination of the Included in this task are mechanical grit channel head. blast decontamination of the channel head, and installation of inflatable plugs in the reactor coolant piping. | |||
: 9. Cut channel head and remove 9. This task includes installation of tenting old S/G lower assembly. and temporary shielding, cutting the transition cone, and channel head, and, rigging and removal of the lower assembly to the containment equipment hatch. | |||
: 10. SVeld shield cover on lower 10. The only item in this task'is welding of assembly; steel plates at each end of the steam | |||
: a. At channel head generator to provide shielding and to | |||
: b. At transition end prevent leakage. | |||
: 11. Cut and remove old divider The divider plate was detached from the plate, weld new divider tubesheet as part of Task 9. Removal and plate. placement of the divider plate to the channel head is included in this task. | |||
: 12. Install new S/G, weld 12. This task includes erection/removal of channel head. scaffolding, rigging and moving the new steam generator, installation/removal of hydroplugs, channel head welding and grinding, and removal of the inflatable plugs in the reactor coolant pipes. | |||
: 13. Placement of steam 13. This task includes transporting of the S/G generator in storage. from the containment equipment hatch into the storage compound and construction of a roof once the S/G's are in the compound. | |||
11 TABLE 2 PERSONNEL EXPOSURE | 11 TABLE 2 PERSONNEL EXPOSURE | ||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
-PER TASK REPORTING PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT-UNIT 0 | - PER TASK REPORTING PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT - UNIT 0 LABOR EXPENDED IN-RADIATION FIELD PERSONNEL EXPOSUREa (PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON-REM) | ||
ESTIMATED ACTUAL ESTIMATED ACTUAL 1.Concrete and structural steel | TASK DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL ESTIMATED ACTUAL | ||
13,660 | : 1. Concrete and structural steel 13,660 21,872 88 69.26 removal and replacement. | ||
: 2. Construction of pedestal 10)280 2,135 32 0.83 cranes, preparation of polar crane, miscellaneous cribbing platforms, and steam generator transfer bridge. | |||
7.Non-manuals (e.g.QC, Engineers, Health Physics).8.Decontamination of the channelhead. | : 3. Removal, modification and 20,600 03,100 256 203.23 reinstallation of steam generator upper assemblies and major piping. | ||
9.Cut channel head and remove old steam generator lower asse mbly.10.%'eld shield cover on lower assembly: a.at channel head | : 0. Construction of temporary 19, 120 - 30, 1.60 215- '0.01 facilities and support services j 5.. General decontamination and 02,310 ~ | ||
00,310 201 167.20 disposal of contaminated materials/cleanup. | |||
: 6. Removal and reinstallation of 8,850 17,862 125 97.83 miscellaneous piping equipment and insulation. | |||
: 7. Non-manuals (e.g. QC, 68,500 03,199 036 157.89 Engineers, Health Physics). | |||
: 8. Decontamination of the 1,800 5,550 210 90.71 channelhead. | |||
: 9. Cut channel head and remove 3,200 0,916 166 05.59 old steam generator lower asse mbly. | |||
: 10. %'eld shield cover on lower assembly: | |||
: a. at channel head 760 1,120 00 16.39 | |||
: b. at transition end 530 916 53 10.82 | |||
12 TABLE 2 (continued) | |||
.PERSONNEL EXPOSURE | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
PER TASK RE'PORTING PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 198. TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT UNIT 0 ~ | |||
ESTIMATED ACTUAL ESTIMATED ACTUAL 11.Cut and remove old divider | LABOR EXPENDED IN RADIATION FIELD PERSONNEL EXPOSUREa (PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON-REM) | ||
TABLE 3A | TASK DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL ESTIMATED ACTUAL | ||
: 11. Cut and remove old divider 2,600 3,065 29 62. 10 plate, weld new divider plate. | |||
: 12. Install new steam generator 11,000 36,881 200 237.60 weld channel head. | |||
13 Placement of steam generator 225 200 25 6.10 in storage. | |||
TOTAL 207)595 251,302 2,080 1,204.00 Estimated Range 1730-2080 a Actual exposures are estimated by self-reading pocket dosimeter totals. | |||
TABLE 3A | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
OF PREPARATORY ACTIVITY EXPOSURES REPORTING PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT | OF PREPARATORY ACTIVITY EXPOSURES REPORTING PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT UNIT 4 ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTIVITY ESTIMATED LABOR EXPENDED ESTIMATED FOR REPORTING EXPENDED STATUS | ||
" TO-DATE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION LABOR TO DATE EXPOSURE PERIOD (C-COMPLETE) | |||
4,816 | (PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON-NOURS) (PERSON"REM) (PERSON-REM) (PERSON"REM) (I-IN PROGRESS) | ||
3,276 | : l. Initial Containment Decontamination. 4,816 3,276 45.00 0.00 18.39 2~ Reactor Cavity Decontamination. 162 0.00 0.00 1.51 | ||
4.Install 8/C Transfer Bridge.960 | .3. Reactor Cavity Liner Plate Inspection. 300 0.00 0.00 6.04 | ||
: 4. Install 8/C Transfer Bridge. 960 147 1.21 0.00 0.29 | |||
: 5. Remove Emergency Containment Coolers. 140 78 1.68 0.00 0.24 | |||
: 6. Remove CRDM Coolers and Fans. 67 215 0.28 0.00 1.34 | |||
[ ~ i ~ | |||
: 7. Rerate Polar Crane and Load Test. : 4,571 . | |||
1,481 9.49 0.00 2.97 | |||
: 8. Disassemble Manipulator Crane and Store. 0 128 0.00 0.00 0.91 rent 4 / | |||
: 9. Install Cherry Pickers. 2,430 266 6.06 0.00 1.35 | |||
: 10. Remove Reactor Coolant Pump Motors. 397 0.00 0.00 2.59 C I | |||
TABLE 3A.(Continued) | TABLE 3A.(Continued) | ||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
OF PREPARATORY ACTIVITY EXPOSURES REPORTING PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARGE 1983 TURKEY POINT-UNIT 4 | OF PREPARATORY ACTIVITY EXPOSURES REPORTING PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARGE 1983 TURKEY POINT - UNIT 4 ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTIVITY ESTIMATED LABOR EXPENDED ESTIMATED FOR REPORTING EXPENDED STATUS;. | ||
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION LABOR TO DATE EXPOSURE PERIOD TO-DATE (C-COMPLETE) | |||
15.Install Temporary Shielding. | (PERSON-BOURS) (PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON-REM) (PERSON-REM) (PERSON-REM) (I-IN PROGRESS) ll. Disconnect/Remove Permanent Electrical Equipment and Cables. 430 304 1.93 0.00 0.79 | ||
16.Install Scaffolding-all levels. | : 12. Install Temporary Pover, Lighting and Electrical Items. 1,148 4,458 49.50 0.00 '18.55 | ||
18.Project nonmanual support.19.On"going Decontamination Activities. | : 13. Remove Miscellaneous Steel. 580 3,532 6.21 0.00 8.20 C | ||
: 14. Install/Maintain S/G Temporary Containments and Ventilation. 1,008 11013 lt.63 0.00 2.92 tr ~ > r ~ | |||
: 15. Install Temporary Shielding. 120 1, 193 2.38 0.00 11.27 | |||
: 16. Install Scaffolding-all levels. 1,440 5i203 3.31 0.00 34.19 | |||
: 17. Cut and remove concrete 30'6 F and 58'levation. 5,334 4,173 52.30 0.00 38.91 | |||
: 18. Project nonmanual support. 6g927 7~207 60.00 0 00 35.57 C | |||
: 19. On"going Decontamination Activities. 1,204 1,092 8.19 0.00 6.13 | |||
TABLE 3A (Continued) | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
OF PREPARATORY ACTIVITY EXPOSURES REPORTING PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT | OF PREPARATORY ACTIVITY EXPOSURES REPORTING PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT UNIT 4 ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTIVIT ESTIMATED LABOR EXPENDED ESTIMATED FOR REPORTINC EXPENDED STATUS ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION LABOR TO DATE EXPOSURE PERIOD TO-DATE (C-COMPLETE) | ||
~(PERSON-HOURS)(PERSON-REM)(PERSON-REM)(PERSON-REM) | (PERSON-HOURS) ~ (PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON-REM) (PERSON-REM) (PERSON-REM) (I-IN PROGRESS) | ||
: 20. Containment Tool and Weld Rod Room Support. 1,232 506 7.55 0.00 Oo35 | |||
22.Crane operation/maintenance. | : 21. Remove/dispose of contaminated materials. 900 3 g009 7.41 0.00 18.64 C ~ | ||
23.Miscellaneous Activities. | : 22. Crane operation/maintenance. 685 3,722 1.36 0.00 7.63 | ||
: 23. Miscellaneous Activities. 1,000 7,560 , 1.51 0.00 11.21 Total - Phase I 34g992 491412 | |||
~ E 283 0.00 229.99 | |||
TABLE 3B | TABLE 3B | ||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
OF REMOVAL ACTIVITY EXPOSURES REPORTINC PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT | OF REMOVAL ACTIVITY EXPOSURES REPORTINC PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT UNIT 4 ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACIUAL EXPOSURE ACTIVITY ESTIMATED LABOR EXPENDED ESTIHATED FOR REPORTINC EXPENDED STATUS ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION LABOR TO DATE EXPOSURE PERIOD TO-DATE (C-COMPLETE) | ||
(PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON-REM) (PERSON-REH) (PERSON-REM) (I-IN PROGRESS) | |||
630 683 33.30 0.00 | : 1. Remove insulation from Aq Bq & C S/G's. 3)500 6~721 77'00 0.00 63.64 | ||
SUMHARY OF REMOVAL ACTIVITY EXPOSURES REPORTINC PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT-UNIT 4 | : 2. Remove feedvater piping A, B, & C S/G's. 147 2,932 1.50 0.00 10.76 | ||
: 3. Remove main steam piping A, B~ & C S/G's. 125 331 0.61 0.00 1.76 | |||
16.On going decontamination | : 4. Remove miscellaneous piping from A, B, & C S/G cubicles. 1,410 1 g'370,, $ 17.62 0.00 18.11 C | ||
17.Remove/dispose of contaminated | : 5. Conduct channel head decontamination A, B~ & C S/C's. | ||
~~TABLE 3B (Continued) | lg835 5,547 214.00 0.00 90.71 | ||
: 6. Cut A, B, & 0 S/C upper assemblies. 630 683 33.30 / 0.00 2 '8 | |||
: 7. Lift A, B, & C S/C upper assemblies, I invert and place in racks. 525 1 g 575 6.75 0.00 7.74 C | |||
: 8. Cut A, B, & C S/G channel heads. 714 2,il5 60.24 0.00 22.33 | |||
: 9. Install tube bundle shield covers A, B, & C 8/C's. 525 916 53.00 0.00 14.82 | |||
TABLE 38 (Continued) | |||
SUMHARY OF REMOVAL ACTIVITY EXPOSURES REPORTINC PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT - UNIT 4 ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTIVITY ESTIMATED LABOR EXPENDED ESTIMATED FOR REPORTINC EXPENDED STATUS;. | |||
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION LABOR TO DATE EXPOSURE PERIOD 'O-DATE (C-COHPLETE) | |||
(PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON"REM) (PERSON"REH) (PERSON-REH) (I-IN PROGRESS) | |||
: 10. Cut A, B & C S/G divider plates. 317 0.00 3.64 ll. Lift A, B & C SCLA, cut and remove seismic rings. Ig089 221 77.16 0.00 3.59 | |||
: 12. Install tube sheet shield covers A, B & C S/G's. 755 1,124 40.00 0.00 16.39 | |||
: 13. Remove A, B & C SGLA's from reactor containment building and place in. storage compound. 225 200'' ZS.OO 0.00 6.14 14.. Maintain temporary power, lighting & electrical items. 'i793 2, 100 55+00 0.00 5.93 15 'aintain, erect, and remove scaffolding. 840 7,308 8.40 0.00 31.47 | |||
: 16. On activities. materials'52 going decontamination 10,900 2,540 32.76 0.00 12.74 | |||
: 17. Remove/dispose of contaminated 3~600 7,617 29 '2 0.00 37.65 | |||
~ ~ | |||
TABLE 3B (Continued) | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
OF REMOVAL ACTIVITY EXPOSURES REPORTING PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT | OF REMOVAL ACTIVITY EXPOSURES REPORTING PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT UNIT 4 ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTIVITY ESTIMATED LABOR EXPENDED ESTIMATED FOR REPORTINC EXPENDED STATUS ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION LABOR TO DATE EXPOSURE PERIOD TO-DATE (C-COMPLRTE) | ||
(PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON REM) (PERSON"REM) (PERSON-REM) (I-IN PROGRESS) | |||
: 18. Project non~anual support. 27,725 6,410 214.72 Q.OQ 24 58 | |||
: 19. Containment tool and weld rod room support. 840 39 2.52 0.00 0.09 | |||
: 20. Crane operation and maintenance. 3,015 2,334 5.44 0.00 4.05 | |||
: 21. Miscellaneous Activities. 8g377, 1,364 58.00 0.00 16.60 Total - Phase II 69,129 54,4'67' 1 1,016 0.00 395.62 P | |||
tent 4 | |||
TABLE 3C | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
OF INSTALLATION ACTIVITY EXPOSURES REPORTING PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT-UNIT 4 | OF INSTALLATION ACTIVITY EXPOSURES REPORTING PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT - UNIT 4 ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTIVITY ESTIMATED LABOR EXPENDED ESTIMATED FOR REPORTING EXPENDED STATUS ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION LABOR TO DATE EXPOSURE PERIOD TO-DATE (C-COMPLETE) | ||
(PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON"REM) (PERSON"REM) (PERSON-REM) (I-IN PROGRESS) | |||
2.Weld preparation of A~B&C S/G channel head remnants.3.Install/weld A, B&C SGLA's (includes post-weld heat treatment). | : 1. Remove S/G upper assembly internals | ||
~ and install/modify A, B and C S/G secondary internal components.. 11,260 6~286 93.10 0.00 14.01 C | |||
6.Installation of A, B&C S/G main steam piping.7, Installation of A, B&C S/G feedwater piping.8, Install insulation A, B&C S/G's.9.Maintain temporary power, lighting and electrical items. | : 2. Weld preparation of A~ B & C S/G channel head remnants. 840 1,757 7.71 0.00 12.69 | ||
SUIRY OF INSTALLATION ACTIVITY EXPOSURES REPORTING PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT | : 3. Install/weld A, B & C SGLA's (includes post-weld heat treatment). 8) 696 27,143 191.64 105.80 213.77 C 4~ Install/weld A, B & C S/G divider plates. lp554 2,764 15i10 58 46 58.46 5; Install/weld A, B & C S/C upper assemblies. 6,280 8,432 23.82 4.68 13.60 | ||
2,840 11.On-going decontamination activities. | : 6. Installation of A, B & C S/G main steam piping. 1,250 996 5.50 0.80 2.28 7, Installation of A, B & C S/G feedwater piping. lp680 1,013 6.80 1.23 lo89 8, Install insulation A, B & C S/G's. 3,486 2,435 29 40 4.17. 4.17 | ||
10,920 | : 9. Maintain temporary power, lighting and electrical items. 2g850 7,819 65.00 8-03 19.14 | ||
13.Project non~anual support. | ~ ~ | ||
16.Miscellaneous activities. | |||
8,704 5,044 | 1 1 | ||
I-1 1 | |||
TABLE 3C (Continued) ( | |||
SUIRY OF INSTALLATION ACTIVITY EXPOSURES 1 REPORTING PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 I TURKEY POINT UNIT 4 ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTIVITY ESTIMATED LABOR EXPENDED ESTIMATED FOR REPORTING EXPENDED STATUS ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION LABOR TO DATE EXPOSURE PERIOD 'O-DATE (C-COMPLETE) | |||
(PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON"HOURS) (PERSON-REM) (PERSON"REM) (PERSON-REM) (I-IN PROGRESS) | |||
: 10. Maintain/erect/remove scaffolding. 2,840 171625 - 20.67 35.16 58.58 | |||
: 11. On-going decontamination activities. 10,920 5,096 . 32.76 7.36 ~ 14.41 | |||
: 12. Remove/dispose of contaminated materials'. 3,600 14,931 29.62 33.54 54.16 C ~ | |||
: 13. Project non~anual support. 14,460 251448 86.27 44.40 74.37 | |||
: 14. Containment Tool & Meld 1 1 | |||
rod room support. 840 458 2 ~ 52 0.49 0.84 tJ n Q ~ | |||
: 15. Crane operation/maintenance. 21740 5,296 5.43 2 33, 4.11 | |||
: 16. Miscellaneous activities. 8,704 5,044 28 '6 . 4.67 16.12~ | |||
Total Phase III 82,000 132,539 644 311.12 562.60}} |
Latest revision as of 23:26, 3 February 2020
ML17345B061 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Turkey Point ![]() |
Issue date: | 04/29/1983 |
From: | Robert E. Uhrig FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
To: | Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
Shared Package | |
ML17345B062 | List: |
References | |
L-82-272, NUDOCS 8305030168 | |
Download: ML17345B061 (32) | |
Text
I i
'REGULATOR NFORMATION DISTRIBUTION 'S EM ('RIDS)
'ACCESSION,NBRt8305030166 DOC DATEt 83/04/29 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET ¹
'FAGIL;.50 '251 tTur key Po'fnt 1Pl anti ',Uni;t 0i Florida IPower -and Light "C 05000251
'AUTH ~ NAME AUTHOR 'AFFILIATION
'UHRIGiR,E,:F 1 or ida iPower I Light Co, GREC IP ~ NAME REC IP IENT. 'AF F IL'IATION VARGAP'S,AB Operating Reactons Branch 1 1
SUBJECT:
.Forwards <<thir d radiological-'progress rept"for ssteam jgener ator irepair'r ograms" DISTRIBUTION 'CODE: 'A001'0 )COPIES RECEIYED:I TR .$ 'lENCL .J "
SIZE:.
tTITLE t OR "Submi't ta 1: 1Gener a l Di st r but i on i RECOPIES NOTES!
RECIPIENT RECIPIENT iCOPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR 'ENCL ID CODE/NAME LT)TR ENCL NRR ORB1 BC 01 "7 7 INTiERNALt ELD/HDS4 1 0 NRR/DE/MTEB 1 1 NRR/DL DIR NRR/DL/ORAB 1 0
-DS- - ETB 1 1 NRR/DS I/RAB 1
.REG ILE OQ .1 1 RGN2 ~ 1 1
.EXTERNALs ACRS =09 l6 I 6 LPDR 03
'NRC:PDR *02'. 1 1 NSIC 05 NT I' 1 1
)TOTAL, NUMBER, OF'."COPIES'EQUIRED: LTTR 25 ENCL 23
( ~ ~
f* : ~'X p .~'i ii,'y' ~ )a 'I >, (Ii) l'3C' ( sp) ~ i , i,~ 'jl<<
fi' T'"
f f 4'>i i '% -~Q lg'>fg<)) 5 q $ e ~I I'as ll',,) A
~-~ ll f ~ ir p I
) k ill ls~X,JX ]pa i "'.)7 g$ .) l, I JL VIO~iilCi9' i~'il>90('>"3 1i f 'p g,>y pi (fill , g'4, ip $ 6
'l l, 4 1(
If
'r op~ a<>% e <<>> 'vv'a >n>a f@z<nr lvr<~oo f fiick )1 Uqgpgi vore<'$'D'1[~)Oq
-3) q qE~'p 4'WOES'1 i']SE~i l') ~3 ~~TJ~<<'4yI g'3 gi> e", <W<yAg Pg5 (ih " ]ail<>',) il~~X Ki<l~>X'.<Ti~X(>>
f39 f +g) 4 f fp f l1 gQ f '>
Q f f'>g 4 f <'gJry h ~1 c 3T'JAN T ~3I'-)J 13'I <<".,] 7'V>~ fi~,]Y')7A,:-3'~
lJ,~.) )N X)>()~ .<X V l',]Q )l 1 l llew ~gQ, l'j "JQ'3) j I
'y i'lJ tW )3fqgii)Q J i1QVi> f ~
Q(lpga;QigSl;l,% Of 4 ~Wg "<~X "~ ~
g lilt <
E~ l~l
);jC-] I ),')l 3l> ~ J]) '1)) )'f )(,g
,4 fl',
Pffft.
f
O. BOX 14000, JUNO BEACH, FL 33408
'sg FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY April 29, 1983 L-83-272 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch gl Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulat'ory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
Dear Mr . Varga:
I Re: Turkey Point Unit 4 Docket No. 50-251 Steam Generator Repair Program
- Radiolo ical Pro ress Re ort - No. 3 Please find attached our thi"rd Radiological Progress Report for the Steam Generator Repair Program as required by Section 3.H.(2)(c) of DPR-41.
Very truly yours, Robert E. Uhrig President 'ice Advanced Systems & Technology REU/PLP/cab Attachment cc: J. P. O'Reilly, Region II Harold F. Reis, Esquire 8305030ih8 8S0yg9 PDR IIIIDOCK R
0500025i PDR.. ~ ...
PEOPL'E... SERVING PEOPLE
0 I TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO.
1.0 'NTRODUCTION 2.0 OCCUPATIONAL RADIATIONEXPOSURE 2.1 General 2.2 Description and Format of Exposure Data 2 2.3 Discussion of Exposure Results 3 3.0 APPLICATION OF DOSE REDUCTION TECHNIQUES (ALARA PRINCIPLES) 3.1 General 3.2 Contamination Control Envelopes and Ventilation 3.3 Installation of Steam Generator Lower Assemblies(SGLAs) 3.0 Welding of Steam Generator Divider Plates 3.5 Reactor Head Preparation for Hot Functional Testing 5 3.6 General Techniques and Practices 5 0.0 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS AND SOLID WASTE 0.1 General 0.2 Liquid Releases 6 0.3 Airborne Releases 0.0 Solid Radioactive Waste
5.0 CONCLUSION
S AND OBSERVATIONS TABLES TABLE 1 Description of Major Tasks 9 TABLE 2 Personnel Exposure Summary - Per Task 11 TABLE 3A Summary of Preparatory Activity Exposures 13 TABLE 3B Summary of Removal Activity Exposures 16 TABLE 3C Summary of Installation Activity Exposures 19 TABLE 3D Summary of Post-Installation Activity Exposures 21 TABLE 0 Personnel Exposure Summary - Per Phase 20 TABLE 5 Summary, of Radioactive Effluent Releases 25 TABLE 6 Summary of Solid Low Level Radioactive Waste Shipments 28
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Radiological Progress Report No. 3 contains information pertaining to the radiological aspects of the Unit 0 Steam Generator Repair Program (SGRP) for the period February 3, 1983 through March 30, 1983. This information includes the following:
- a. An assessment and summary of the occupational exposure and labor expended for each reporting period (throughout the project).
- b. An evaluation of the effectiveness of dose reduction techniques (ALARA principles). F
- c. An estimate of the radioactivity released in liquid and airborne effluents.
- d. An estimate of the solid radioactive waste generated including volume and radioactive content.
Significant project. tasks performed during this reporting period included:
- 1. Removal of steam generator transfer bridge.
- 2. Installation of main steam and feedwatez piping.
- 3. Complete installation of steam generator upper and lower assemblies.
Welding of steam generator divider plates.
5.
/
Inspection and close-out of'steam generators in preparation for testing.
l
- 6. Installation of insulation on steam genet ators.
- 7. Installation of miscellaneous piping in,steam generator cubicles.
- 8. Installation of miscellaneous steel.
- 9. Installation of reactor coolant pump motors.
- 10. Installation of emergency containment coo'lers, control rod drive mechanism coolers and fans.
- 11. Installation of concrete stop logs, concrete forms, rebar and pouring of new concrete.
- 12. Preparation for and conducting of hot functional testing.
- 13. Cleanup activities (removal of scaffolding and support equipment, removal of temporary shielding).
Several on-going activities also performed during this period included: cleanup and decontamination,'aintenance of temporary electrical power and lighting services, surveillance of temporary shielding, health physics support and project supervision.
I 2.0 OCCUPATIONAL RADIATIONEXPOSURE 2.1 General As indicated in Radiological Progress Report No. 1, occupational exposure to radiation may'e considered the major radiological impact of the SGRP. The program developed to collect exposure information and provide accurate "
assessments of tasks performed is discussed in detail in Section 2.1 2.3 of Radiological Progress Report No. 1. This program was utilized throughout this reporting period. -A description of the thirteen (13) major tas' r ~
- 15. Install Temporary Shielding. 120 1, 193 2.38 0.00 11.27
- 16. Install Scaffolding-all levels. 1,440 5i203 3.31 0.00 34.19
- 17. Cut and remove concrete 30'6 F and 58'levation. 5,334 4,173 52.30 0.00 38.91
- 18. Project nonmanual support. 6g927 7~207 60.00 0 00 35.57 C
- 19. On"going Decontamination Activities. 1,204 1,092 8.19 0.00 6.13
TABLE 3A (Continued)
SUMMARY
OF PREPARATORY ACTIVITY EXPOSURES REPORTING PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT UNIT 4 ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTIVIT ESTIMATED LABOR EXPENDED ESTIMATED FOR REPORTINC EXPENDED STATUS ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION LABOR TO DATE EXPOSURE PERIOD TO-DATE (C-COMPLETE)
(PERSON-HOURS) ~ (PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON-REM) (PERSON-REM) (PERSON-REM) (I-IN PROGRESS)
- 20. Containment Tool and Weld Rod Room Support. 1,232 506 7.55 0.00 Oo35
- 21. Remove/dispose of contaminated materials. 900 3 g009 7.41 0.00 18.64 C ~
- 22. Crane operation/maintenance. 685 3,722 1.36 0.00 7.63
- 23. Miscellaneous Activities. 1,000 7,560 , 1.51 0.00 11.21 Total - Phase I 34g992 491412
~ E 283 0.00 229.99
TABLE 3B
SUMMARY
OF REMOVAL ACTIVITY EXPOSURES REPORTINC PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT UNIT 4 ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACIUAL EXPOSURE ACTIVITY ESTIMATED LABOR EXPENDED ESTIHATED FOR REPORTINC EXPENDED STATUS ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION LABOR TO DATE EXPOSURE PERIOD TO-DATE (C-COMPLETE)
(PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON-REM) (PERSON-REH) (PERSON-REM) (I-IN PROGRESS)
- 1. Remove insulation from Aq Bq & C S/G's. 3)500 6~721 77'00 0.00 63.64
- 2. Remove feedvater piping A, B, & C S/G's. 147 2,932 1.50 0.00 10.76
- 3. Remove main steam piping A, B~ & C S/G's. 125 331 0.61 0.00 1.76
- 4. Remove miscellaneous piping from A, B, & C S/G cubicles. 1,410 1 g'370,, $ 17.62 0.00 18.11 C
- 5. Conduct channel head decontamination A, B~ & C S/C's.
lg835 5,547 214.00 0.00 90.71
- 6. Cut A, B, & 0 S/C upper assemblies. 630 683 33.30 / 0.00 2 '8
- 7. Lift A, B, & C S/C upper assemblies, I invert and place in racks. 525 1 g 575 6.75 0.00 7.74 C
- 8. Cut A, B, & C S/G channel heads. 714 2,il5 60.24 0.00 22.33
- 9. Install tube bundle shield covers A, B, & C 8/C's. 525 916 53.00 0.00 14.82
TABLE 38 (Continued)
SUMHARY OF REMOVAL ACTIVITY EXPOSURES REPORTINC PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT - UNIT 4 ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTIVITY ESTIMATED LABOR EXPENDED ESTIMATED FOR REPORTINC EXPENDED STATUS;.
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION LABOR TO DATE EXPOSURE PERIOD 'O-DATE (C-COHPLETE)
(PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON"REM) (PERSON"REH) (PERSON-REH) (I-IN PROGRESS)
- 10. Cut A, B & C S/G divider plates. 317 0.00 3.64 ll. Lift A, B & C SCLA, cut and remove seismic rings. Ig089 221 77.16 0.00 3.59
- 12. Install tube sheet shield covers A, B & C S/G's. 755 1,124 40.00 0.00 16.39
- 13. Remove A, B & C SGLA's from reactor containment building and place in. storage compound. 225 200 ZS.OO 0.00 6.14 14.. Maintain temporary power, lighting & electrical items. 'i793 2, 100 55+00 0.00 5.93 15 'aintain, erect, and remove scaffolding. 840 7,308 8.40 0.00 31.47
- 16. On activities. materials'52 going decontamination 10,900 2,540 32.76 0.00 12.74
- 17. Remove/dispose of contaminated 3~600 7,617 29 '2 0.00 37.65
~ ~
TABLE 3B (Continued)
SUMMARY
OF REMOVAL ACTIVITY EXPOSURES REPORTING PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT UNIT 4 ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTIVITY ESTIMATED LABOR EXPENDED ESTIMATED FOR REPORTINC EXPENDED STATUS ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION LABOR TO DATE EXPOSURE PERIOD TO-DATE (C-COMPLRTE)
(PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON REM) (PERSON"REM) (PERSON-REM) (I-IN PROGRESS)
- 18. Project non~anual support. 27,725 6,410 214.72 Q.OQ 24 58
- 19. Containment tool and weld rod room support. 840 39 2.52 0.00 0.09
- 20. Crane operation and maintenance. 3,015 2,334 5.44 0.00 4.05
- 21. Miscellaneous Activities. 8g377, 1,364 58.00 0.00 16.60 Total - Phase II 69,129 54,4'67' 1 1,016 0.00 395.62 P
tent 4
TABLE 3C
SUMMARY
OF INSTALLATION ACTIVITY EXPOSURES REPORTING PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 TURKEY POINT - UNIT 4 ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTIVITY ESTIMATED LABOR EXPENDED ESTIMATED FOR REPORTING EXPENDED STATUS ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION LABOR TO DATE EXPOSURE PERIOD TO-DATE (C-COMPLETE)
(PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON"REM) (PERSON"REM) (PERSON-REM) (I-IN PROGRESS)
- 1. Remove S/G upper assembly internals
~ and install/modify A, B and C S/G secondary internal components.. 11,260 6~286 93.10 0.00 14.01 C
- 2. Weld preparation of A~ B & C S/G channel head remnants. 840 1,757 7.71 0.00 12.69
- 3. Install/weld A, B & C SGLA's (includes post-weld heat treatment). 8) 696 27,143 191.64 105.80 213.77 C 4~ Install/weld A, B & C S/G divider plates. lp554 2,764 15i10 58 46 58.46 5; Install/weld A, B & C S/C upper assemblies. 6,280 8,432 23.82 4.68 13.60
- 6. Installation of A, B & C S/G main steam piping. 1,250 996 5.50 0.80 2.28 7, Installation of A, B & C S/G feedwater piping. lp680 1,013 6.80 1.23 lo89 8, Install insulation A, B & C S/G's. 3,486 2,435 29 40 4.17. 4.17
- 9. Maintain temporary power, lighting and electrical items. 2g850 7,819 65.00 8-03 19.14
~ ~
1 1
I-1 1
TABLE 3C (Continued) (
SUIRY OF INSTALLATION ACTIVITY EXPOSURES 1 REPORTING PERIOD 3 FEBRUARY 1983 TO 30 MARCH 1983 I TURKEY POINT UNIT 4 ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTUAL EXPOSURE ACTIVITY ESTIMATED LABOR EXPENDED ESTIMATED FOR REPORTING EXPENDED STATUS ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION LABOR TO DATE EXPOSURE PERIOD 'O-DATE (C-COMPLETE)
(PERSON-HOURS) (PERSON"HOURS) (PERSON-REM) (PERSON"REM) (PERSON-REM) (I-IN PROGRESS)
- 10. Maintain/erect/remove scaffolding. 2,840 171625 - 20.67 35.16 58.58
- 11. On-going decontamination activities. 10,920 5,096 . 32.76 7.36 ~ 14.41
- 12. Remove/dispose of contaminated materials'. 3,600 14,931 29.62 33.54 54.16 C ~
- 13. Project non~anual support. 14,460 251448 86.27 44.40 74.37
- 14. Containment Tool & Meld 1 1
rod room support. 840 458 2 ~ 52 0.49 0.84 tJ n Q ~
- 15. Crane operation/maintenance. 21740 5,296 5.43 2 33, 4.11
- 16. Miscellaneous activities. 8,704 5,044 28 '6 . 4.67 16.12~
Total Phase III 82,000 132,539 644 311.12 562.60