ML19308B049

Discusses Util 770421 Rept, Evaluation of Potential Turbine Bldg Flooding at Oconee. Inadvisable to Proceed W/Mods Mitigating Consequences of Max Postulated Flood Condition. Revised Schedule Will Be Provided Pending Resolution

ML19308B049
Person / Time
Site:	Oconee
Issue date:	07/29/1977
From:	Parker W DUKE POWER CO.
To:	Case E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7912120801
Download: ML19308B049 (2)

Text

.p .

1 v.s.Nucts An caoutATony L NDMS I NRCvomu la5 l214:

uissioN 46 *1 Lq ]%%][M l NRC OlSTRIBUTION pon PART 50 DOCKET MATERIAL I

' 'Y TO: FROM: oATE or occuuaNT Duke Power Company 7/29/77 Mr. Edson G. Case Charlotte, North Carolina oATe ascrive o 1 William O. Parker, Jr. 8/2/77  !

K TTs a msciNAL CNoronizao amor iNeuTpomu Nuussa or comiss mactivso gNcLAssipis o

$u cerv l 5 e,9 # c e c:semiPTioN ENeLosuma Concerns a previously submitted report entitled " Evaluation of Potential Turbine Flooding at the Oconee Nuclear Station".,

(1-P)

PIX 3T NAME: Oconee Units 1-2-3 RJL 8/2/77 2AFEw FOR ACTION /INFORMATION ENVIPSNMENTAL i I ASSTC?ED ADe _ a ASSIGNED ADt V. MOORE (LTR)

% upMicu <*HTE?t ('I } .9C.h WMAJ C @ E~~

BRANCH CHIEF:

I Pc03ECT v.ANAGERI " -

PROJECT MANAGER 1 LICENSING ASSISTANTt ( LICENSING ASSISTANT I i

! I B. HARLESS l Ag INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION Woen evt eeA5 ] I SYSTFMS SAFETY l l PLANT SYSTEMS I SI*E SAFEIY &

b n ong T' lHEINt' MAN ITEDESCO IENVIRON ANALYSIS j 17 . e fil "'

iSCHROEDER i3ENAR0YA I I DENTON & MULLER fner n I ieatNAg I 9"Truvret n

[ Id099TI'M t STAvr ENGINEERINO lIPPOLITO IX viva,m i vNTcuT Iy, poeA I ENVIRO TECH.

I VT ur' I POSNAK l ERNST 4cAce ""1 STuvELL OPERATING REAC"tRS i 3ALLARD unyn I eA',Jt T rXT 13 L STetTO I YOUNGBLOOD I I l) [ eT erN uvv* I I ownte m vaNAceve r I i peAcTR CAFE *Y 17 eMA0 l______..

I wnefunt T I i50SS Nd i BAER I I o. c0tLIN9 I INOVAK A EUTLER I GA." MILL (2)

I untigmN I E1SZTCC:'Y Y GRIMES I _,

I ve, ?? ICHECK l SITE ABALYSIS _I i iuyt-rure l l l 1 VOLLMER _

i ev IATLI I i 4 BUNCH .

I l SALT'/"AN I '

M J. COLLINS i i et' ?EEG i l IKREGER EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION CON. TROL NUMBER

x tprR kl ALha is t i c . 6 i

//M&

IX TIC '

X NSIC i i -

1 I MA? tlB l' I l I gg, Li REG IV (J. ANCHE-~)I i n I I /~~ . . ,

lY 16 CYS ACES SENT CA!3GCRY D i i i1 i i I e NLC FCmu 195 e2-7sl

~ ~~

• a < * .

Dune Powen CO)1Pm Powra Dintomo 402 SocTn CucHcu SrazzT, CilAHLoTTE. N. C. asa4a wiwau o. aan ca, sa. July 29, 1977

/ict Pettiotut ?ngewo%C Aeta 704

$. tam anoovct.ow 373 4083 o, ! , N.

, , \ .'

t$

?>

Mr. Edson G. Case, Acting Director }'/ ,'. w.g

., , , y &

Y g!

office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation p- .

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission .' . .f.

q

- ,'f'..tn F Washington, D. C. 20555 ,- ,#. c'% ,C,0

\u,' p . '. .

'%

Re: Oconee Nuclear Station - # 'r .-

Dear

• My letter of April 21, 1977 provided a report entitled " Evaluation of Potential Turbine Building Flooding at the Oconee Nuclear Station".

In this report, certain corrective actions were outlined which would mitigate the consequences of the maximum postulated flood condition.

The purpose of that letter was to appraise you of our approach and schedule for resolving the issue.

Although the proposed modifications can be implemented pursuant to 10CFR50.59, and prior NRC approval is not required, members of your staff requested the opportunity to review out .roposed plans prior to implementation. In as much as complete agreement has not been reached with your staff, it is considered inadvisable to proceed with these modifications at the present time. A revised schedule for implementation will be provided when resolution is achieved.

Very truly yours, 0.

William O. Parker, Jr.

MST:ge

.g AO I