ML18180A046: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML18180A046
| number = ML18180A046
| issue date = 06/21/2018
| issue date = 06/21/2018
| title = 2018/06/21 - Comment (92) E-mail Regarding T.P. 3&4 Slr EIS Scoping
| title = Comment (92) E-mail Regarding T.P. 3&4 SLR EIS Scoping
| author name = Public Commenter
| author name = Public Commenter
| author affiliation = Public Commenter
| author affiliation = Public Commenter
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:TurkeyPoint34SLREISCEm Resource From:                              marashl@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Mara Shlackman
                                  <marashl@everyactioncustom.com>
Sent:                              Thursday, June 21, 2018 3:32 PM To:                                TurkeyPoint34SLREIS Resource
 
==Subject:==
[External_Sender] Comments RE: Docket ID NRC-2018-0101 (License Renewal for FPL's Turkey Point)
 
==Dear NRC Staff,==
 
As a resident of South Florida who spent my childhood living within a 10-mile radius of Turkey Point, it is my view that the NRC should reject FPL's application for an unprecedented extension of time to operate the existing nuclear reactors.
A nuclear plant should never have been placed between two national parks (Biscayne and Everglades), and the time has come to shut down these reactors, especially since the plant is already contaminating nearby resources such as Biscayne Bay and threatening our regions drinking water.
I am also concerned about the continuing on-site storage of spent fuel rods in pools that require continuous electricity to keep from overheating. According to the Christian Science Monitor, article dated 5/25/11,* the amount stored at Turkey Point is 2.5 times more radioactive than what was at Fukushima. Given Turkey Point's location, it is vulnerable to power shutdowns from hurricanes, which could result in a meltdown of the pools of spent fuel rods.
The NRC needs to be aware that Turkey Point and the area around it has already experienced the negative effects of sea level rise and storm surges. The NRC needs to study a range of sea level rise projections and consider those impacts on the plant, the cooling canal system, and the surrounding community, including for emergency evacuation procedures and planning.
Thank you.
*https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/0525/Report-Unacceptable-threat-from-spent-fuel-pools-at-US-nuclear-power-plants Sincerely, Mara Shlackman 2100 S Ocean Dr Apt 8E Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316-3817 1
 
Federal Register Notice:        83FR23726 Comment Number:                92 Mail Envelope Properties      (20180621193132.1.13D8DBF2882938EA)
 
==Subject:==
[External_Sender] Comments RE: Docket ID NRC-2018-0101 (License Renewal for FPL's Turkey Point)
Sent Date:              6/21/2018 3:31:32 PM Received Date:          6/21/2018 3:31:42 PM From:                  marashl@everyactioncustom.com Created By:            marashl@everyactioncustom.com Recipients:
Post Office:            everyactioncustom.com Files                          Size                  Date & Time MESSAGE                        1605                  6/21/2018 3:31:42 PM Options Priority:                      Standard Return Notification:            No Reply Requested:                No Sensitivity:                    Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 05:02, 2 December 2019

Comment (92) E-mail Regarding T.P. 3&4 SLR EIS Scoping
ML18180A046
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/21/2018
From: Public Commenter
Public Commenter
To:
Division of Materials and License Renewal
NRC/NRR/DMLR
References
83FR23726
Download: ML18180A046 (2)
v • d • e


Text

TurkeyPoint34SLREISCEm Resource From: marashl@everyactioncustom.com on behalf of Mara Shlackman

<marashl@everyactioncustom.com>

Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 3:32 PM To: TurkeyPoint34SLREIS Resource

Subject:

[External_Sender] Comments RE: Docket ID NRC-2018-0101 (License Renewal for FPL's Turkey Point)

Dear NRC Staff,

As a resident of South Florida who spent my childhood living within a 10-mile radius of Turkey Point, it is my view that the NRC should reject FPL's application for an unprecedented extension of time to operate the existing nuclear reactors.

A nuclear plant should never have been placed between two national parks (Biscayne and Everglades), and the time has come to shut down these reactors, especially since the plant is already contaminating nearby resources such as Biscayne Bay and threatening our regions drinking water.

I am also concerned about the continuing on-site storage of spent fuel rods in pools that require continuous electricity to keep from overheating. According to the Christian Science Monitor, article dated 5/25/11,* the amount stored at Turkey Point is 2.5 times more radioactive than what was at Fukushima. Given Turkey Point's location, it is vulnerable to power shutdowns from hurricanes, which could result in a meltdown of the pools of spent fuel rods.

The NRC needs to be aware that Turkey Point and the area around it has already experienced the negative effects of sea level rise and storm surges. The NRC needs to study a range of sea level rise projections and consider those impacts on the plant, the cooling canal system, and the surrounding community, including for emergency evacuation procedures and planning.

Thank you.

Federal Register Notice: 83FR23726 Comment Number: 92 Mail Envelope Properties (20180621193132.1.13D8DBF2882938EA)

Subject:

[External_Sender] Comments RE: Docket ID NRC-2018-0101 (License Renewal for FPL's Turkey Point)

Sent Date: 6/21/2018 3:31:32 PM Received Date: 6/21/2018 3:31:42 PM From: marashl@everyactioncustom.com Created By: marashl@everyactioncustom.com Recipients:

Post Office: everyactioncustom.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1605 6/21/2018 3:31:42 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18180A046&oldid=2223996"