IR 05000266/2009402: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams|number = ML090750902}}
{{Adams
| number = ML090750902
| issue date = 03/12/2009
| title = IR 05000266-09-402 (Drs); 05000301-09-402 (Drs); 01/26/2009 - 01/30/2009; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; Routine Security Baseline Inspection - Cover Page
| author name = Duncan E
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/PSB
| addressee name = Meyer L
| addressee affiliation = Florida Power & Light Energy Point Beach, LLC
| docket = 05000266, 05000301
| license number = DPR-024, DPR-027
| contact person =
| document report number = IR-09-402
| document type = Inspection Report, Letter
| page count = 5
}}


{{IR-Nav| site = 05000266 | year = 2009 | report number = 402 }}
{{IR-Nav| site = 05000266 | year = 2009 | report number = 402 }}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:rch 12, 2009
[[Issue date::March 12, 2009]]


Mr. Larry Meyer Site Vice President FPL Energy Point Beach, LLC 6610 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, WI 54241
==SUBJECT:==
POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 NRC SECURITY BASELINE INSPECTION REPORT 05000266/2009402(DRS);
5000301/2009402(DRS)


SUBJECT: POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 NRC SECURITY BASELINE INSPECTION REPORT 05000266/2009402(DRS); 5000301/2009402(DRS)
==Dear Mr. Meyer:==
On January 30, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security baseline inspection at your Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on January 30, 2009, with Mr. J. Bjorseth and other members of your staff.
 
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
 
The inspector reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.


==Dear Mr. Meyer:==
This report documents one finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process). The deficiency was promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspector left the site. The finding had a cross-cutting aspect in the area of Human Performance, Resources,
On January 30, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security baseline inspection at your Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRC's Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on January 30, 2009, with Mr. J. Bjorseth and other members of your staff. The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. The inspector reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. This report documents one finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process). The deficiency was promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspector left the site. The finding had a cross-cutting aspect in the area of Human Performance, Resources, [H.2(c)] because the licensee failed to maintain complete, accurate, and up-to-date procedures. Additionally, a licensee-identified violation which was determined to be of very low security significance is listed in this report. However, because of the very low security significance and because they are entered into your corrective action program, the NRC is treating these violations as non-cited violations (NCVs) consistent with Section VI.A.1 of the NRC Enforcement Policy. If you contest these NCVs, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN.: Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region III; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Point Beach Nuclear Plant. Enclosure contains Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information. When separated from enclosure, this transmittal document is decontrolled. The findings were both self-revealed and licensee identified. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letter's enclosure will not be available for public inspection.
[H.2(c)] because the licensee failed to maintain complete, accurate, and up-to-date procedures.
 
Additionally, a licensee-identified violation which was determined to be of very low security significance is listed in this report. However, because of the very low security significance and because they are entered into your corrective action program, the NRC is treating these violations as non-cited violations (NCVs) consistent with Section VI.A.1 of the NRC Enforcement Policy. If you contest these NCVs, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN.: Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region III; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Point Beach Nuclear Plant.
 
Enclosure contains Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information. When separated from enclosure, this transmittal document is decontrolled. The findings were both self-revealed and licensee identified.
 
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).


In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's document system, ADAMS. If Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letters enclosure will not be available for public inspection.


Sincerely,/RA by D. Funk for/ Eric Duncan, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-266; 50-301 License Nos. DPR-24; DPR-27 Nonpublic
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs document system, ADAMS. If Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21.


===Enclosure:===
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Inspection Report 05000266/2009402(DRS); 05000301/2009402(DRS)


===w/Attachment:===
Sincerely,
Supplemental Information See Attached Distribution
/RA by D. Funk for/
Eric Duncan, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-266; 50-301 License Nos. DPR-24; DPR-27 Nonpublic Enclosure: Inspection Report 05000266/2009402(DRS);
05000301/2009402(DRS)
w/Attachment: Supplemental Information See Attached Distribution
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 08:05, 14 November 2019

IR 05000266-09-402 (Drs); 05000301-09-402 (Drs); 01/26/2009 - 01/30/2009; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; Routine Security Baseline Inspection - Cover Page
ML090750902
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/12/2009
From: Eric Duncan
Plant Support Branch II
To: Meyer L
Florida Power & Light Energy Point Beach
References
IR-09-402
Download: ML090750902 (5)
v • d • e


Text

rch 12, 2009

SUBJECT:

POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 NRC SECURITY BASELINE INSPECTION REPORT 05000266/2009402(DRS);

5000301/2009402(DRS)

Dear Mr. Meyer:

On January 30, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security baseline inspection at your Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on January 30, 2009, with Mr. J. Bjorseth and other members of your staff.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.

The inspector reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.

This report documents one finding of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process). The deficiency was promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspector left the site. The finding had a cross-cutting aspect in the area of Human Performance, Resources,

H.2(c) because the licensee failed to maintain complete, accurate, and up-to-date procedures.

Additionally, a licensee-identified violation which was determined to be of very low security significance is listed in this report. However, because of the very low security significance and because they are entered into your corrective action program, the NRC is treating these violations as non-cited violations (NCVs) consistent with Section VI.A.1 of the NRC Enforcement Policy. If you contest these NCVs, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN.: Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region III; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Point Beach Nuclear Plant.

Enclosure contains Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information. When separated from enclosure, this transmittal document is decontrolled. The findings were both self-revealed and licensee identified.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letters enclosure will not be available for public inspection.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs document system, ADAMS. If Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

/RA by D. Funk for/

Eric Duncan, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-266; 50-301 License Nos. DPR-24; DPR-27 Nonpublic Enclosure: Inspection Report 05000266/2009402(DRS);

05000301/2009402(DRS)

w/Attachment: Supplemental Information See Attached Distribution

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000266/2009402&oldid=2148063"