ML103500566: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:",t.",R REGu(.q UNITED STATES "'0'1' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | {{#Wiki_filter:",t.",R REGu(.q UNITED STATES | ||
! WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 .q' 0 | ~vv "'0'1' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
! ~ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 | |||
: | |||
.q' 0 | |||
~ | |||
~ iii February 9, 2011 Y/. t' | |||
"'., ....0 | |||
****-il LICENSEE: PSEG Nuclear, LLC FACILITY: Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 2010, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (NRC) AND PSEG NUCLEAR, LLC, CONCERNING DRAFT RESPONSE TO THE SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION (SALEM), UNITS 1 AND 2, REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, AND CONCERNING NRC OPEN ITEM PERTAINING TO SALEM, SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PSEG Nuclear, LLC (the applicant), and Exelon held a telephone conference call on November 18, 2010, to discuss and clarify the applicant's draft response to request for additional information (RAI) 8.2.1.33-07 and to the NRC open item in the Safety Evaluation Report with Open Items on leakage from the spent fuel pool. Enclosure 1 provides a listing of the participants. | OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 2010, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (NRC) AND PSEG NUCLEAR, LLC, CONCERNING DRAFT RESPONSE TO THE SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION (SALEM), | ||
Enclosure 2 contains a brief summary of the discussion and status of the items. Enclosure 3 contains the staff's draft RAI B2.1.33-07 and the applicant's questions for clarification. | UNITS 1 AND 2, REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, AND CONCERNING NRC OPEN ITEM PERTAINING TO SALEM, SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PSEG Nuclear, LLC (the applicant), and Exelon held a telephone conference call on November 18, 2010, to discuss and clarify the applicant's draft response to request for additional information (RAI) 8.2.1.33-07 and to the NRC open item in the Safety Evaluation Report with Open Items on leakage from the spent fuel pool. | ||
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary. Bennett M. Brady, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311 | Enclosure 1 provides a listing of the participants. Enclosure 2 contains a brief summary of the discussion and status of the items. Enclosure 3 contains the staff's draft RAI B2.1.33-07 and the applicant's questions for clarification. | ||
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary. | |||
Bennett M. Brady, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311 | |||
==Enclosures:== | ==Enclosures:== | ||
: 1. List of Participants | : 1. List of Participants | ||
: 2. Summary of meeting discussion | : 2. Summary of meeting discussion | ||
: 3. Applicant's response to D-RAI cc w/encls: Distribution via Listserv TELEPHONE CONFERENCE SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1 AND LICENSE RENEWAL LIST OF November 18. 2010 PARTICIPANTS Bennett Brady | : 3. Applicant's response to D-RAI cc w/encls: Distribution via Listserv | ||
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS November 18. 2010 PARTICIPANTS AFFILIATIONS Bennett Brady U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | |||
Ali Fakhar PSEG Nuclear, LLC Jim Stavely PSEG Nuclear, LLC George Seibold PSEG Nuclear, LLC Ed Keating PSEG Nuclear, LLC AI Fulvio Exelon Albert Piha Exelon John Hufnagel Exelon Jim Annett Exelon John Simons MPR Associates ENCLOSLIRE 1 | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
OF MEETING DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RESPONSES SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1 AND NOVEMBER 18, The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PSEG Nuclear, LLC (the applicant) held a telephone conference call on November 18,2010, to discuss and clarify 1) the applicant responses to the NRC's request for additional information (RAI B.2.1.33-07) and 2) NRC open item in the Safety Evaluation Report with Open Items on leakage from the spent fuel pool. Discussion on Response to RAI 8.2.1.33-07 The applicant discussed their proposed response to RAI B.2.1.33-07. The NRC staff clarified that, although the RAI and the open item may seem to discuss different issues, they are both related to the same concern. The meeting led to an agreement that the applicant should cover all of the responses in their formal RAI response, and that their presentation to the ACRS Subcommittee on December 1,2010, should cover both the RAt and the response to the open item. The meeting led to an agreement that the response did not have to be submitted until December 15, 2010, to possibly capture additional information that may come up in the ACRS meeting. The NRC Project Manager will document this date change. ENCLOSURE DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1 AND LICENSE RENEWAL RAI B.2.1.33-07 | OF MEETING ON DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RESPONSES FOR SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 NOVEMBER 18, 2010 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PSEG Nuclear, LLC (the applicant) held a telephone conference call on November 18,2010, to discuss and clarify 1) the applicant responses to the NRC's request for additional information (RAI B.2.1.33-07) and 2) NRC open item in the Safety Evaluation Report with Open Items on leakage from the spent fuel pool. | ||
Discussion on Response to RAI 8.2.1.33-07 | |||
* The applicant discussed their proposed response to RAI B.2.1.33-07. | |||
* The NRC staff clarified that, although the RAI and the open item may seem to discuss different issues, they are both related to the same concern. | |||
* The meeting led to an agreement that the applicant should cover all of the responses in their formal RAI response, and that their presentation to the ACRS Subcommittee on December 1,2010, should cover both the RAt and the response to the open item. | |||
* The meeting led to an agreement that the response did not have to be submitted until December 15, 2010, to possibly capture additional information that may come up in the ACRS meeting. | |||
The NRC Project Manager will document this date change. | |||
ENCLOSURE 2 | |||
DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION RAI B.2.1.33-07 | |||
==Background:== | ==Background:== | ||
The Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1. spent fuel pool (SFP) has experienced borated water leakage, including leakage through the concrete walls. In response to request for additional information B.2.1.33-05, dated September 1, 2010, the applicant stated: "Presently, there are no indications of active leakage from the SFP through the SFP wall." Issue: Although the applicant has stated that there are no indications of active leakage through the accessible SFP wall, the applicant has not confirmed that there is no through-wall leakage from the three inaccessible walls of the SFP. Request: Provide information to confirm the claim that there is no active through-wall leakage from the SFP occurring in any of the SFP walls, including the inaccessible walls. ENCLOSURE | The Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1. spent fuel pool (SFP) has experienced borated water leakage, including leakage through the concrete walls. In response to request for additional information B.2.1.33-05, dated September 1, 2010, the applicant stated: "Presently, there are no indications of active leakage from the SFP through the SFP wall." | ||
Issue: | |||
Although the applicant has stated that there are no indications of active leakage through the accessible SFP wall, the applicant has not confirmed that there is no through-wall leakage from the three inaccessible walls of the SFP. | |||
Request: | |||
Provide information to confirm the claim that there is no active through-wall leakage from the SFP occurring in any of the SFP walls, including the inaccessible walls. | |||
ENCLOSURE 3 | |||
' ML103500566 *concurrence via e-mail OFFICE LA:DLR* PM:RPB1 :DLR BC:RPB1:DLR PM:RPB1 :DLR NAME SFigueroa BBrady BPham BBrady DATE 12/21/10 2/2/11 2/4/11 2/9/11 | |||
Memorandum to PSEG Nuclear, LLC from B. Brady dated February 9, 2011 | |||
== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 2010, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (NRC) AND PSEG NUCLEAR, LLC, CONCERNING DRAFT RESPONSE TO THE SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION (SNGS), UNITS 1 AND 2, REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, AND CONCERNING NRC OPEN ITEM PERTAINING TO SNGS, SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT DISTRIBUTION: | OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 2010, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (NRC) AND PSEG NUCLEAR, LLC, CONCERNING DRAFT RESPONSE TO THE SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION (SNGS), | ||
HARD COPY: DLR RF E-MAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RdsNrrDlrRarb Resource Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource BPham BBrady ACunanan SCuadrado REnnis CSanders BHarris, OGC ABurritt, RI RConte, RI MModes, RI DTifft, RI NMcNamara, RI}} | UNITS 1 AND 2, REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, AND CONCERNING NRC OPEN ITEM PERTAINING TO SNGS, SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT DISTRIBUTION: | ||
HARD COPY: | |||
DLR RF E-MAIL: | |||
PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RdsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDI~Rasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource BPham BBrady ACunanan SCuadrado REnnis CSanders BHarris, OGC ABurritt, RI RConte, RI MModes, RI DTifft, RI NMcNamara, RI}} |
Revision as of 05:24, 13 November 2019
ML103500566 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Salem |
Issue date: | 02/09/2011 |
From: | Bennett Brady License Renewal Projects Branch 1 |
To: | Division of License Renewal |
BRADY B, NRR/DLR/RPB1, 415-2981 | |
References | |
Download: ML103500566 (6) | |
Text
",t.",R REGu(.q UNITED STATES
~vv "'0'1' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
! ~ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001
.q' 0
~
~ iii February 9, 2011 Y/. t'
"'., ....0
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 2010, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (NRC) AND PSEG NUCLEAR, LLC, CONCERNING DRAFT RESPONSE TO THE SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION (SALEM),
UNITS 1 AND 2, REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, AND CONCERNING NRC OPEN ITEM PERTAINING TO SALEM, SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PSEG Nuclear, LLC (the applicant), and Exelon held a telephone conference call on November 18, 2010, to discuss and clarify the applicant's draft response to request for additional information (RAI) 8.2.1.33-07 and to the NRC open item in the Safety Evaluation Report with Open Items on leakage from the spent fuel pool.
Enclosure 1 provides a listing of the participants. Enclosure 2 contains a brief summary of the discussion and status of the items. Enclosure 3 contains the staff's draft RAI B2.1.33-07 and the applicant's questions for clarification.
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
Bennett M. Brady, Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311
Enclosures:
- 1. List of Participants
- 2. Summary of meeting discussion
- 3. Applicant's response to D-RAI cc w/encls: Distribution via Listserv
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS November 18. 2010 PARTICIPANTS AFFILIATIONS Bennett Brady U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Ali Fakhar PSEG Nuclear, LLC Jim Stavely PSEG Nuclear, LLC George Seibold PSEG Nuclear, LLC Ed Keating PSEG Nuclear, LLC AI Fulvio Exelon Albert Piha Exelon John Hufnagel Exelon Jim Annett Exelon John Simons MPR Associates ENCLOSLIRE 1
SUMMARY
OF MEETING ON DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RESPONSES FOR SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 NOVEMBER 18, 2010 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PSEG Nuclear, LLC (the applicant) held a telephone conference call on November 18,2010, to discuss and clarify 1) the applicant responses to the NRC's request for additional information (RAI B.2.1.33-07) and 2) NRC open item in the Safety Evaluation Report with Open Items on leakage from the spent fuel pool.
Discussion on Response to RAI 8.2.1.33-07
- The applicant discussed their proposed response to RAI B.2.1.33-07.
- The NRC staff clarified that, although the RAI and the open item may seem to discuss different issues, they are both related to the same concern.
- The meeting led to an agreement that the applicant should cover all of the responses in their formal RAI response, and that their presentation to the ACRS Subcommittee on December 1,2010, should cover both the RAt and the response to the open item.
- The meeting led to an agreement that the response did not have to be submitted until December 15, 2010, to possibly capture additional information that may come up in the ACRS meeting.
The NRC Project Manager will document this date change.
ENCLOSURE 2
DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION RAI B.2.1.33-07
Background:
The Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1. spent fuel pool (SFP) has experienced borated water leakage, including leakage through the concrete walls. In response to request for additional information B.2.1.33-05, dated September 1, 2010, the applicant stated: "Presently, there are no indications of active leakage from the SFP through the SFP wall."
Issue:
Although the applicant has stated that there are no indications of active leakage through the accessible SFP wall, the applicant has not confirmed that there is no through-wall leakage from the three inaccessible walls of the SFP.
Request:
Provide information to confirm the claim that there is no active through-wall leakage from the SFP occurring in any of the SFP walls, including the inaccessible walls.
ENCLOSURE 3
' ML103500566 *concurrence via e-mail OFFICE LA:DLR* PM:RPB1 :DLR BC:RPB1:DLR PM:RPB1 :DLR NAME SFigueroa BBrady BPham BBrady DATE 12/21/10 2/2/11 2/4/11 2/9/11
Memorandum to PSEG Nuclear, LLC from B. Brady dated February 9, 2011
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 2010, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (NRC) AND PSEG NUCLEAR, LLC, CONCERNING DRAFT RESPONSE TO THE SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION (SNGS),
UNITS 1 AND 2, REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, AND CONCERNING NRC OPEN ITEM PERTAINING TO SNGS, SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT DISTRIBUTION:
HARD COPY:
DLR RF E-MAIL:
PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RdsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDI~Rasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource BPham BBrady ACunanan SCuadrado REnnis CSanders BHarris, OGC ABurritt, RI RConte, RI MModes, RI DTifft, RI NMcNamara, RI