ML17303A772: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:t ill AC CELZRATKO DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:8802290002 DOC.DATE: 88/02/17 NOTARIZED:
{{#Wiki_filter:AC CELZRATKO t
NO DOCKET FACIL:STN-50-528 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Arizona Publi 05000528 STN-50-529 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 2, Arizona Publi 05000529 STN-50-530 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 3, Arizona Publi 05000530 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION VAN BRUNT,E.E.
DISTRIBUTION               ill DEMONSTRATION REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
Arizona Nuclear Power Project (formerly Arizona Public Serv RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)NOTES:Standardized plant.Standardized plant.Standardized plant.
SYSTEM ACCESSION NBR:8802290002       DOC.DATE: 88/02/17   NOTARIZED: NO         DOCKET FACIL:STN-50-528 Palo Verde Nuclear Station,     Unit 1, Arizona Publi 05000528 STN-50-529 Palo Verde Nuclear Station,     Unit 2, Arizona Publi 05000529 STN-50-530 Palo Verde Nuclear Station,     Unit 3, Arizona Publi 05000530 AUTH. NAME         AUTHOR AFFILIATION VAN BRUNT,E.E.     Arizona Nuclear Power Project (formerly Arizona Public Serv RECIP.NAME         RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Forwards util response to Generic Ltr 88-02.R DISTRIBUTION CODE A062D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR
Forwards util response to Generic Ltr 88-02.                               R DISTRIBUTION TITLE:  OR CODE   A062D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR   ~NCL     eeLBIZE:
~NCL eeLBIZE: I TITLE: OR Licensing Submittal:
Licensing Submittal: Integrated Safety Assessment Program (ISAPII)
Integrated Safety Assessment Program (ISAPII)9 05000528 05000529 g 05000530 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD5 LA PD5 PD DAVIS,M INTERNAL ACRS NRR/DEST/ADS 7E NRR/DEST/MTB 9H NRR/DOEA/TSB11F OGC 15-B-18 RES/DE/EIB EXTERNAL: LPDR NSIC NOTES COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 0 5 5 1 1 6 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NRR MILLER,M LICITRA,E ARM/DAF/LFMB NRR/DEST/CEB 8H NRR/DEST/RSB 8E NRR PMAS/ILRB12 01 NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A R I S'A TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 29 ENCL 26
I NOTES:Standardized    plant.                                              05000528 9
Standardized plant.                                                05000529 g Standardized plant.                                                05000530 RECIPIENT       COPIES          RECIPIENT        COPIES ID CODE/NAME     LTTR ENCL      ID CODE/NAME      LTTR ENCL          A PD5 LA               1    0    NRR MILLER,M          1    1 PD5 PD               5    5    LICITRA,E            1    1 DAVIS,M               1    1 INTERNAL ACRS                   6    6    ARM/DAF/LFMB          1    0 NRR/DEST/ADS 7E       1    1    NRR/DEST/CEB 8H      1    1 NRR/DEST/MTB 9H       1    1    NRR/DEST/RSB 8E      1    1 NRR/DOEA/TSB11F       1    1    NRR PMAS/ILRB12      1    1 OGC 15-B-18         1    0                    01    1    1 RES/DE/EIB           1    1 EXTERNAL: LPDR                   1     1     NRC PDR               1   1 NSIC                  1     1 NOTES                            1     1 R
I S
                                                                                  'A TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR       29   ENCL   26
 
(
(
Arizona Nuclear Power Project P.O.SOX 52034~PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85072-2034 Docket Nos.STN 50-528/529/530 February 17, 1988 161-00807-EEVB/GS U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555 Attention:
Arizona Nuclear Power Project P.O. SOX 52034 ~ PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85072-2034 February 17, 1988 161-00807-EEVB/GS Docket Nos. STN   50-528/529/530 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Attention:     Document   Control Desk
Document Control Desk  


==Dear Sirs:==
==Dear Sirs:==


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Response to Generic Letter 88-02 File: 88-010-026 Attached is ANPP's response to Generic Letter 88-02 dated January 20, 1988.If you have any questions, please call Mr.A.C.Rogers at (602)371-4041.Very truly y s, E.E.Van Brunt, Jr.Executive Vice President Project Director EEVB/GS/cal Attachment cc: 0.M.De Michele (all v/a)A.C.Gehr G.W.Knighton E.A.Licitra J.B.Martin T.J.Polich'8802290002 880217 PDR ADOCK 05000528 P.,DCD  
Response   to Generic     Letter 88-02 File:   88-010-026 Attached   is ANPP's response     to Generic Letter 88-02 dated January 20, 1988.
If you have any questions,       please     call Mr. A. C. Rogers at (602) 371-4041.
Very   truly   y     s, E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.
Executive Vice President Project Director EEVB/GS/cal Attachment cc:   0. M. De   Michele (all v/a)
A. C. Gehr G. W. Knighton E. A. Licitra J. B. Martin T. J. Polich
'8802290002     880217 PDR     ADOCK   05000528 P                   .,DCD
 
ATTACHMENT Inte rated Safet    Assessment  Pro ram  ISAP'l Res onse  Format  to Generic Letter 88-02 Faci l i ty  Name,  Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Utility:      Arizona Public Service      Company Individual Contact        Name: A. C. Rogers                  Phone Number:(602) 371-4041 An  expression of interest will not be considered          a cormitment to participa.e on the    part of the utility.
: 1. Mould you be frame'?
interested in participating in    ISAP  II?  If so,  in what time
                'O
: 2. Do  you believe    that an industry/NRC seminar consisting of a brief discuss'.on by  NRC  followed by a question and answer period would be beneficial          prior'o making a.decision?
    'es; all utilities interested or not interested should be able to participate in the industry/NRC'seminar.
~
: 3. Mould you be interest'ed      in a one-on-one meeting with the      NPC to discuss your particular facility or facilities?
NO
: 4. If you    remain urdecided regarding      participation,  what additicnal infcrmation do you need      in order to  make a  decision?
It is    not applicable since      ANPP  has decided not to    participate in the ISAP    II program.
: 5. Do  you have any    potential concerns about participating in !.'RP II?
Major potential concerns consist of (1) uncertainty about the content of IPE Generic Letter, (2) lack of decision as to who (the NRC staff or the utility) will evaluate the operating experience review to identify trends, (3) impact on operating..license, (4) impact on the budget.
: 6. Do  you have any suggesticns      for  program improvements or chances?
The    rigorous implementation of the ISAP II program through amendements to the operating license and/or license conditions should be eliminated.


ATTACHMENT Inte rated Safet Assessment Pro ram ISAP'l Res onse Format to Generic Letter 88-02 Faci l i ty Name, Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Utility: Arizona Public Service Company Individual Contact Name: A.C.Rogers Phone Number:(602) 371-4041 An expression of interest will not be considered a cormitment to participa.e on the part of the utility.1.Mould you be interested in participating in ISAP II?If so, in what time frame'?'O 2.Do you believe that an industry/NRC seminar consisting of a brief discuss'.on by NRC followed by a question and answer period would be beneficial prior'o making a.decision?
~ ~ P
'es;all utilities interested or not interested should be able to participate in the industry/NRC'seminar.
      ~ ~}}
~3.Mould you be interest'ed in a one-on-one meeting with the NPC to discuss your particular facility or facilities?
NO 4.If you remain urdecided regarding participation, what additicnal infcrmation do you need in order to make a decision?It is not applicable since ANPP has decided not to participate in the ISAP II program.5.Do you have any potential concerns about participating in!.'RP II?Major potential concerns consist of (1)uncertainty about the content of IPE Generic Letter, (2)lack of decision as to who (the NRC staff or the utility)will evaluate the operating experience review to identify trends, (3)impact on operating..license, (4)impact on the budget.6.Do you have any suggesticns for program improvements or chances?The rigorous implementation of the ISAP II program through amendements to the operating license and/or license conditions should be eliminated.
~~P~~}}

Latest revision as of 11:02, 29 October 2019

Forwards Response to Generic Ltr 88-02 Re Isap II
ML17303A772
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 02/17/1988
From: Van Brunt E
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
161-00807-EEVB, 161-807-EEVB, GL-88-02, GL-88-2, NUDOCS 8802290002
Download: ML17303A772 (6)


Text

AC CELZRATKO t

DISTRIBUTION ill DEMONSTRATION REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

SYSTEM ACCESSION NBR:8802290002 DOC.DATE: 88/02/17 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:STN-50-528 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Arizona Publi 05000528 STN-50-529 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 2, Arizona Publi 05000529 STN-50-530 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 3, Arizona Publi 05000530 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION VAN BRUNT,E.E. Arizona Nuclear Power Project (formerly Arizona Public Serv RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Forwards util response to Generic Ltr 88-02. R DISTRIBUTION TITLE: OR CODE A062D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ~NCL eeLBIZE:

Licensing Submittal: Integrated Safety Assessment Program (ISAPII)

I NOTES:Standardized plant. 05000528 9

Standardized plant. 05000529 g Standardized plant. 05000530 RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL A PD5 LA 1 0 NRR MILLER,M 1 1 PD5 PD 5 5 LICITRA,E 1 1 DAVIS,M 1 1 INTERNAL ACRS 6 6 ARM/DAF/LFMB 1 0 NRR/DEST/ADS 7E 1 1 NRR/DEST/CEB 8H 1 1 NRR/DEST/MTB 9H 1 1 NRR/DEST/RSB 8E 1 1 NRR/DOEA/TSB11F 1 1 NRR PMAS/ILRB12 1 1 OGC 15-B-18 1 0 01 1 1 RES/DE/EIB 1 1 EXTERNAL: LPDR 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC 1 1 NOTES 1 1 R

I S

'A TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 29 ENCL 26

(

Arizona Nuclear Power Project P.O. SOX 52034 ~ PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85072-2034 February 17, 1988 161-00807-EEVB/GS Docket Nos. STN 50-528/529/530 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Attention: Document Control Desk

Dear Sirs:

Subject:

Response to Generic Letter 88-02 File: 88-010-026 Attached is ANPP's response to Generic Letter 88-02 dated January 20, 1988.

If you have any questions, please call Mr. A. C. Rogers at (602) 371-4041.

Very truly y s, E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.

Executive Vice President Project Director EEVB/GS/cal Attachment cc: 0. M. De Michele (all v/a)

A. C. Gehr G. W. Knighton E. A. Licitra J. B. Martin T. J. Polich

'8802290002 880217 PDR ADOCK 05000528 P .,DCD

ATTACHMENT Inte rated Safet Assessment Pro ram ISAP'l Res onse Format to Generic Letter 88-02 Faci l i ty Name, Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Utility: Arizona Public Service Company Individual Contact Name: A. C. Rogers Phone Number:(602) 371-4041 An expression of interest will not be considered a cormitment to participa.e on the part of the utility.

1. Mould you be frame'?

interested in participating in ISAP II? If so, in what time

'O

2. Do you believe that an industry/NRC seminar consisting of a brief discuss'.on by NRC followed by a question and answer period would be beneficial prior'o making a.decision?

'es; all utilities interested or not interested should be able to participate in the industry/NRC'seminar.

~

3. Mould you be interest'ed in a one-on-one meeting with the NPC to discuss your particular facility or facilities?

NO

4. If you remain urdecided regarding participation, what additicnal infcrmation do you need in order to make a decision?

It is not applicable since ANPP has decided not to participate in the ISAP II program.

5. Do you have any potential concerns about participating in !.'RP II?

Major potential concerns consist of (1) uncertainty about the content of IPE Generic Letter, (2) lack of decision as to who (the NRC staff or the utility) will evaluate the operating experience review to identify trends, (3) impact on operating..license, (4) impact on the budget.

6. Do you have any suggesticns for program improvements or chances?

The rigorous implementation of the ISAP II program through amendements to the operating license and/or license conditions should be eliminated.

~ ~ P

~ ~