|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARPLA-5120, Forwards Change J to SSES Security Training & Qualification Plan.Without Encl1999-10-22022 October 1999 Forwards Change J to SSES Security Training & Qualification Plan.Without Encl ML18040B2951999-09-0808 September 1999 Requests Info Re Any NRC or Susquehanna Documented Concerns with MSIV Reliability Prior to Plant Trip & Assurance to Public That NRC Able to Detect Mgt Problems Early PLA-5094, Forwards,For Review,Change 00 to SSES Physical Security Plan.Without Encl1999-08-24024 August 1999 Forwards,For Review,Change 00 to SSES Physical Security Plan.Without Encl ML18040A9741999-07-0808 July 1999 Forwards Rev 30 to SSES Emergency Plan, Adding EAL to Account for Potential Conditions Associated with Dry Cask Storage Sys Being Installed at Plant ML20207G5051999-06-0707 June 1999 Informs That NRC Office of NRR Reorganized Effective 990328.As Part of Reorganization,Divison of Licensing Project Management Created PLA-5072, Forwards Change Nn to SSES Physical Security Plan.Util Determined That Changes Do Not Decrease Safeguards Effectiveness of Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Encl Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR73.211999-06-0404 June 1999 Forwards Change Nn to SSES Physical Security Plan.Util Determined That Changes Do Not Decrease Safeguards Effectiveness of Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Encl Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR73.21 ML18040A9731999-05-24024 May 1999 Submits Response to RAI Re Exemption from Biennial Exercise Schedule.Changing of Drill Date Will Not Reduce Level of Emergency Preparedness at Plant ML20195B2181999-05-20020 May 1999 Forwards Proprietary Decommissioning Status Rept for 10% Interest in Sses,Units 1 & 2.Proprietary Info Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790 ML18040B2901999-04-30030 April 1999 Forwards Summary Rept of Safety Evaluations Approved During Period from 961024-981029,per 10CFR50.59(b).Format of Rept, Listed PLA-5041, Forwards Proprietary & Redacted Decommissioning Rept of Financial Assurance for Util 90% Interest in Sses,Units 1 & 2,per 10CFR50.75(f)(1).Proprietary Info Withheld,Per 10CFR2.7901999-03-29029 March 1999 Forwards Proprietary & Redacted Decommissioning Rept of Financial Assurance for Util 90% Interest in Sses,Units 1 & 2,per 10CFR50.75(f)(1).Proprietary Info Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790 ML18040A9691999-03-12012 March 1999 Forwards Revised Proposed Amend 227 to License NPF-14, Proposing Changes to ANFB-10 Critical Power Correlation & MCPR Safety Limits ML17164A9891999-03-12012 March 1999 Informs That Util 990312 Ltr (PLA-5040) Submitted to NRC, Missing Encl C.Requests to Replace Package in Entirety with Encl ML18040A9721999-03-11011 March 1999 Requests That Date for full-participation SSES Exercise, Scheduled for Week of 991115,be Changed Due to FEMA Region III Scheduling Conflicts.Fema Requests That Exercise Date Be Changed to Week of 001031 PLA-4852, Forwards non-redacted Version of Pp&L,Inc Corporate Auditing Rept 739459-2-98,dated 980210.Informs That Document Contains Info to Be Withheld IAW 10CFR2.7901999-02-18018 February 1999 Forwards non-redacted Version of Pp&L,Inc Corporate Auditing Rept 739459-2-98,dated 980210.Informs That Document Contains Info to Be Withheld IAW 10CFR2.790 ML20203G5821999-02-17017 February 1999 Second Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents. Documents Listed in App C Being Released in Entirety. Documents Listed in App D Being Withheld in Part (Ref FOIA Exemption 5) ML20202F4761999-01-29029 January 1999 First Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Records in App a Encl & Being Released in Entirety.App B Records Being Withheld in Part (Ref FOIA Exemption 7C) ML18040A9671999-01-29029 January 1999 Notifies That Util Implemented Severe Accident Mgt Strategy in Accordance with Ltr Dtd 950327.Emegency Plan Revs Which Were Required to Implement Strategy Were Submitted by Ltr Dtd 981125 ML18040A9681999-01-29029 January 1999 Requests Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50 App E,Items IVF.2.b & C,To Allowed to Reschedule Federally Observed Full Participation Emergency Exercise for SSES from Wk of 991115 to Wk of 001031 ML18040A9651999-01-12012 January 1999 Submits Addl Info Re Proposed Amend 184 to License NPF-22 for ANFB-10 Critical Power Correlation & MCPR Safety Limits ML18030A1021998-12-16016 December 1998 Forwards Tables as Requested During 981202 Telcon Re Proposed Amend 184,dtd 980804,re ANFB-10 Critical Power Correlation & MCPR Safety Limits.Tables Provide Roadmap Identifying Applicability of References to TSs ML18030A4331998-11-25025 November 1998 Forwards Rev 29 to SSES Emergecny Plan.Changes Has Been Made Without Commission Approval as It Does Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan & Plan as Changed Continues to Satisfy Applicable Requirements of App E to 10CFR50 ML20195J9101998-11-18018 November 1998 Forwards Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Amends to Facility Operating Licenses (Notice).Notice Has Been Filed with Ofc of Fr.Amends Would Have Revised TS to Eliminate HPCI Pump auto-transfer on High Suppression Pool Level ML20155F7201998-11-0303 November 1998 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Documents Listed in App B Being Encl & Being Released in Entirety. Documents Listed in App C Being Withheld in Part (Ref Exemption 7C) ML18026A2941998-10-19019 October 1998 Forwards SSES ISI Outage Summary Rept for Unit 1 Tenth Refueling & Insp Outage ML18030A4321998-10-12012 October 1998 Forwards Rev 28 to SSES Emergency Plan, IAW Requirements of 10CFR50.54q.Change Is Summarized PLA-4993, Forwards Change Mm to SSES Physical Security Plan.Encl Withheld,Per 10CFR73.211998-10-12012 October 1998 Forwards Change Mm to SSES Physical Security Plan.Encl Withheld,Per 10CFR73.21 ML18030A1001998-10-12012 October 1998 Forwards Rev 27 to SSES Emergency Plan. Changes Become Effective Upon Implementation of Improved Tech Specs ML18030A4311998-09-29029 September 1998 Forwards Rev 27 & 28 to SSES Emergency Plan ML20151W4951998-09-10010 September 1998 Informs That as Part of NRC Probabilistic Risk Assessment Implementation Plan,Commission Assigned Two Senior Reactor Analysts (Sras) to Each Regional Ofc.T Shedlosky & J Trapp Has Been Assigned SRAs for Region I IR 05000387/19980081998-09-0808 September 1998 Provides Response to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-387/98-08 & 50-388/98-08.Corrective Actions:Current Administrative Controls on Fuel Level in EDG Day Tanks Will Remain in Effect Until TS Change is Approved ML18030A0991998-09-0808 September 1998 Provides Response to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-387/98-08 & 50-388/98-08.Corrective Actions:Current Administrative Controls on Fuel Level in EDG Day Tanks Will Remain in Effect Until TS Change Is Approved ML18026A4961998-08-31031 August 1998 Responds to NRC 980731 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-387/98-03 & 50-388/98-03.Corrective Actions:Procurement & Affected User Group Personnel Visited EDG Vendor Facilities to Appraise Vendor Work Practices & Discuss Expectations IR 05000387/19980031998-08-31031 August 1998 Responds to NRC 980731 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-387/98-03 & 50-388/98-03.Corrective Actions:Procurement & Affected User Group Personnel Visited EDG Vendor Facilities to Appraise Vendor Work Practices & Discuss Expectations ML20202F5501998-07-17017 July 1998 Responds to PP&L Corp Auditing Repts 739459-97,739459-1-97 & 739459-2-98 Re SSES Investigations Into Missed Alarm Tests ML20236P9451998-07-15015 July 1998 Forwards Emergency Response Data Sys Implementation Documents Including Data Point Library Updates for Oconee (Number 255),Dresden (Number 257) & Susquehanna (Number 258) ML18030A4291998-07-0808 July 1998 Forwards Final Version of SSES TS Implementing Improved TS of NUREG-1433.Implementation of Proposed Amend Is Predicted on NRC Issuance of Amends & Proposed to Not Exceed 90 Days from Date of Amend Issue ML18017A2181998-07-0808 July 1998 Forwards Final Version of SSES TS Implementing Improved Tech Specs of NUREG 1433.Implementation of Proposed Amend Is Predicated on NRC Issuance of Amends & Is Proposed to Not Exceed 90 Days from Date of Amend Issuance ML18026A2901998-06-0909 June 1998 Forwards Rev 26 to Emergency Plan IAW 10CFR50.54q.Summary of Changes Listed ML18026A2891998-05-22022 May 1998 Submits Withdrawal of Expedited Review/Approval of Tech Specs/Bases 3/4.3.7.11 & 3/4.11.2.6 & Response to Request for Addl Info Re Offgas Sys Mods ML18026A4941998-05-12012 May 1998 Responds to NRC Request to Resubmit Proposal to Change TS for Plant,Units 1 & 2,to Support Implementation of Improved TS & to Implement Provisions of GL 86-10 Re Relocation of Plant'S Fire Protection Program from TS to Another Document ML20202H1331998-04-16016 April 1998 Partially Deleted Ltr Re Concerns Raised to NRC Concerning PP&L Susquehanna Facility NUREG-0619, Informs That Staff Finds PP&L 980330 Request for Relief from Requirements of Section 4.3 of NUREG-0619,exams of Feedwater Nozzle Bore & Inner Radius for Another Operating Cycle to Be Acceptable1998-04-15015 April 1998 Informs That Staff Finds PP&L 980330 Request for Relief from Requirements of Section 4.3 of NUREG-0619,exams of Feedwater Nozzle Bore & Inner Radius for Another Operating Cycle to Be Acceptable ML20216B6811998-04-0101 April 1998 First Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents. Forwards Documents Listed in App a Being Released in Entirety ML17159A2341998-03-30030 March 1998 Forwards LER 97-007-01,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i)(B).Revised LER Submitted to Modify Previous Position W/Regards to Entry Into TS 3.0.3 for Event PLA-4865, Forwards Listed non-redacted Pp&L,Inc Corporate Auditing Repts.Informs That Document Contains Info to Be Withheld IAW 10CFR2.7901998-03-11011 March 1998 Forwards Listed non-redacted Pp&L,Inc Corporate Auditing Repts.Informs That Document Contains Info to Be Withheld IAW 10CFR2.790 ML17159A1781998-03-0202 March 1998 Forwards Proposed Amends 203 & 161 to License NPF-14 & NPF-22,revising Tech Specs to Be Consistent w/NUREG-1433,rev 1, Std Tech Specs for GE Plants,Bwr 4. PLA-4856, Forwards Proposed Amends to Licenses NPF-14 & NPF-22, Revising TS to Be Consistent w/NUREG-1433,rev 1, Std TS for GE Plants,Bwr 4. Proposed TS Consistent w/NUREG-1433,rev 1, Encl1998-03-0202 March 1998 Forwards Proposed Amends to Licenses NPF-14 & NPF-22, Revising TS to Be Consistent w/NUREG-1433,rev 1, Std TS for GE Plants,Bwr 4. Proposed TS Consistent w/NUREG-1433,rev 1, Encl PLA-4854, Provides Summary of Investigations That PP&L Performed in Response to Concerns Identified by Former Nuclear Plant Operator.Summary Requested by Cj Anderson on 9802131998-02-27027 February 1998 Provides Summary of Investigations That PP&L Performed in Response to Concerns Identified by Former Nuclear Plant Operator.Summary Requested by Cj Anderson on 980213 ML20203M5071998-02-26026 February 1998 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Records in App a Being Placed in PDR & Encl.Records in App B Partially Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 6) ML20203B5931998-02-23023 February 1998 Ack Receipt of & Wire in Amount of $55,000 in Payment for Civil Penatly Proposed by NRC Ltr . Corrective Actions Will Be Examined During Future Inspections 1999-09-08
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARPLA-5120, Forwards Change J to SSES Security Training & Qualification Plan.Without Encl1999-10-22022 October 1999 Forwards Change J to SSES Security Training & Qualification Plan.Without Encl ML18040B2951999-09-0808 September 1999 Requests Info Re Any NRC or Susquehanna Documented Concerns with MSIV Reliability Prior to Plant Trip & Assurance to Public That NRC Able to Detect Mgt Problems Early PLA-5094, Forwards,For Review,Change 00 to SSES Physical Security Plan.Without Encl1999-08-24024 August 1999 Forwards,For Review,Change 00 to SSES Physical Security Plan.Without Encl ML18040A9741999-07-0808 July 1999 Forwards Rev 30 to SSES Emergency Plan, Adding EAL to Account for Potential Conditions Associated with Dry Cask Storage Sys Being Installed at Plant PLA-5072, Forwards Change Nn to SSES Physical Security Plan.Util Determined That Changes Do Not Decrease Safeguards Effectiveness of Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Encl Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR73.211999-06-0404 June 1999 Forwards Change Nn to SSES Physical Security Plan.Util Determined That Changes Do Not Decrease Safeguards Effectiveness of Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Encl Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR73.21 ML18040A9731999-05-24024 May 1999 Submits Response to RAI Re Exemption from Biennial Exercise Schedule.Changing of Drill Date Will Not Reduce Level of Emergency Preparedness at Plant ML20195B2181999-05-20020 May 1999 Forwards Proprietary Decommissioning Status Rept for 10% Interest in Sses,Units 1 & 2.Proprietary Info Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790 ML18040B2901999-04-30030 April 1999 Forwards Summary Rept of Safety Evaluations Approved During Period from 961024-981029,per 10CFR50.59(b).Format of Rept, Listed PLA-5041, Forwards Proprietary & Redacted Decommissioning Rept of Financial Assurance for Util 90% Interest in Sses,Units 1 & 2,per 10CFR50.75(f)(1).Proprietary Info Withheld,Per 10CFR2.7901999-03-29029 March 1999 Forwards Proprietary & Redacted Decommissioning Rept of Financial Assurance for Util 90% Interest in Sses,Units 1 & 2,per 10CFR50.75(f)(1).Proprietary Info Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790 ML17164A9891999-03-12012 March 1999 Informs That Util 990312 Ltr (PLA-5040) Submitted to NRC, Missing Encl C.Requests to Replace Package in Entirety with Encl ML18040A9691999-03-12012 March 1999 Forwards Revised Proposed Amend 227 to License NPF-14, Proposing Changes to ANFB-10 Critical Power Correlation & MCPR Safety Limits ML18040A9721999-03-11011 March 1999 Requests That Date for full-participation SSES Exercise, Scheduled for Week of 991115,be Changed Due to FEMA Region III Scheduling Conflicts.Fema Requests That Exercise Date Be Changed to Week of 001031 PLA-4852, Forwards non-redacted Version of Pp&L,Inc Corporate Auditing Rept 739459-2-98,dated 980210.Informs That Document Contains Info to Be Withheld IAW 10CFR2.7901999-02-18018 February 1999 Forwards non-redacted Version of Pp&L,Inc Corporate Auditing Rept 739459-2-98,dated 980210.Informs That Document Contains Info to Be Withheld IAW 10CFR2.790 ML18040A9681999-01-29029 January 1999 Requests Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50 App E,Items IVF.2.b & C,To Allowed to Reschedule Federally Observed Full Participation Emergency Exercise for SSES from Wk of 991115 to Wk of 001031 ML18040A9671999-01-29029 January 1999 Notifies That Util Implemented Severe Accident Mgt Strategy in Accordance with Ltr Dtd 950327.Emegency Plan Revs Which Were Required to Implement Strategy Were Submitted by Ltr Dtd 981125 ML18040A9651999-01-12012 January 1999 Submits Addl Info Re Proposed Amend 184 to License NPF-22 for ANFB-10 Critical Power Correlation & MCPR Safety Limits ML18030A1021998-12-16016 December 1998 Forwards Tables as Requested During 981202 Telcon Re Proposed Amend 184,dtd 980804,re ANFB-10 Critical Power Correlation & MCPR Safety Limits.Tables Provide Roadmap Identifying Applicability of References to TSs ML18030A4331998-11-25025 November 1998 Forwards Rev 29 to SSES Emergecny Plan.Changes Has Been Made Without Commission Approval as It Does Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan & Plan as Changed Continues to Satisfy Applicable Requirements of App E to 10CFR50 ML18026A2941998-10-19019 October 1998 Forwards SSES ISI Outage Summary Rept for Unit 1 Tenth Refueling & Insp Outage ML18030A4321998-10-12012 October 1998 Forwards Rev 28 to SSES Emergency Plan, IAW Requirements of 10CFR50.54q.Change Is Summarized ML18030A1001998-10-12012 October 1998 Forwards Rev 27 to SSES Emergency Plan. Changes Become Effective Upon Implementation of Improved Tech Specs PLA-4993, Forwards Change Mm to SSES Physical Security Plan.Encl Withheld,Per 10CFR73.211998-10-12012 October 1998 Forwards Change Mm to SSES Physical Security Plan.Encl Withheld,Per 10CFR73.21 ML18030A4311998-09-29029 September 1998 Forwards Rev 27 & 28 to SSES Emergency Plan ML18030A0991998-09-0808 September 1998 Provides Response to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-387/98-08 & 50-388/98-08.Corrective Actions:Current Administrative Controls on Fuel Level in EDG Day Tanks Will Remain in Effect Until TS Change Is Approved IR 05000387/19980081998-09-0808 September 1998 Provides Response to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-387/98-08 & 50-388/98-08.Corrective Actions:Current Administrative Controls on Fuel Level in EDG Day Tanks Will Remain in Effect Until TS Change is Approved ML18026A4961998-08-31031 August 1998 Responds to NRC 980731 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-387/98-03 & 50-388/98-03.Corrective Actions:Procurement & Affected User Group Personnel Visited EDG Vendor Facilities to Appraise Vendor Work Practices & Discuss Expectations IR 05000387/19980031998-08-31031 August 1998 Responds to NRC 980731 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-387/98-03 & 50-388/98-03.Corrective Actions:Procurement & Affected User Group Personnel Visited EDG Vendor Facilities to Appraise Vendor Work Practices & Discuss Expectations ML18017A2181998-07-0808 July 1998 Forwards Final Version of SSES TS Implementing Improved Tech Specs of NUREG 1433.Implementation of Proposed Amend Is Predicated on NRC Issuance of Amends & Is Proposed to Not Exceed 90 Days from Date of Amend Issuance ML18030A4291998-07-0808 July 1998 Forwards Final Version of SSES TS Implementing Improved TS of NUREG-1433.Implementation of Proposed Amend Is Predicted on NRC Issuance of Amends & Proposed to Not Exceed 90 Days from Date of Amend Issue ML18026A2901998-06-0909 June 1998 Forwards Rev 26 to Emergency Plan IAW 10CFR50.54q.Summary of Changes Listed ML18026A2891998-05-22022 May 1998 Submits Withdrawal of Expedited Review/Approval of Tech Specs/Bases 3/4.3.7.11 & 3/4.11.2.6 & Response to Request for Addl Info Re Offgas Sys Mods ML18026A4941998-05-12012 May 1998 Responds to NRC Request to Resubmit Proposal to Change TS for Plant,Units 1 & 2,to Support Implementation of Improved TS & to Implement Provisions of GL 86-10 Re Relocation of Plant'S Fire Protection Program from TS to Another Document ML17159A2341998-03-30030 March 1998 Forwards LER 97-007-01,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i)(B).Revised LER Submitted to Modify Previous Position W/Regards to Entry Into TS 3.0.3 for Event PLA-4865, Forwards Listed non-redacted Pp&L,Inc Corporate Auditing Repts.Informs That Document Contains Info to Be Withheld IAW 10CFR2.7901998-03-11011 March 1998 Forwards Listed non-redacted Pp&L,Inc Corporate Auditing Repts.Informs That Document Contains Info to Be Withheld IAW 10CFR2.790 PLA-4856, Forwards Proposed Amends to Licenses NPF-14 & NPF-22, Revising TS to Be Consistent w/NUREG-1433,rev 1, Std TS for GE Plants,Bwr 4. Proposed TS Consistent w/NUREG-1433,rev 1, Encl1998-03-0202 March 1998 Forwards Proposed Amends to Licenses NPF-14 & NPF-22, Revising TS to Be Consistent w/NUREG-1433,rev 1, Std TS for GE Plants,Bwr 4. Proposed TS Consistent w/NUREG-1433,rev 1, Encl ML17159A1781998-03-0202 March 1998 Forwards Proposed Amends 203 & 161 to License NPF-14 & NPF-22,revising Tech Specs to Be Consistent w/NUREG-1433,rev 1, Std Tech Specs for GE Plants,Bwr 4. PLA-4854, Provides Summary of Investigations That PP&L Performed in Response to Concerns Identified by Former Nuclear Plant Operator.Summary Requested by Cj Anderson on 9802131998-02-27027 February 1998 Provides Summary of Investigations That PP&L Performed in Response to Concerns Identified by Former Nuclear Plant Operator.Summary Requested by Cj Anderson on 980213 ML20216B7031998-02-22022 February 1998 Partially Deleted Ltr Requesting Copy of OI Rept on Plant, Unit 2,case 1-96-039 PLA-4851, Provides Info That Was Requested by Cj Anderson on 980213 Re Former Util Employee Concern on Radwaste Control Room Offgas Panel Alarm Testing1998-02-18018 February 1998 Provides Info That Was Requested by Cj Anderson on 980213 Re Former Util Employee Concern on Radwaste Control Room Offgas Panel Alarm Testing ML20203M5791998-02-10010 February 1998 Enters Appeal Due to Lack of Response to FOIA Request 97-473 ML18030A0971998-02-0202 February 1998 Forwards Proprietary Response to RAI Re Proposed License Amend 209 to TS Supporting Cycle 11 Reload.Proprietary Info Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790 ML20203G6071998-01-26026 January 1998 Forwards Redacted Version of Pp&L,Inc Corporate Auditings Interim Rept 739459-97,dtd 971015 & Affidavit Pursuant to 10CFR2.790 Justifying That Redacted Portions Be Withheld from Public Disclosure.Without Rept IR 05000387/19970031998-01-0606 January 1998 Provides Updated Response to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-387/97-03 & 50-388/97-03.Corrective Actions:Util Currently Scheduling Issuance of All Procedural Revs by End of First Quarter 1998 ML18017A2931998-01-0606 January 1998 Provides Responses to Improved TS Section 3.8 Per 970324 NRC Rai.Schedule 980628 for Improved TS Implementation. Submittal of Revised Specifications Is Planned for Jan 1998 ML18030A4071998-01-0606 January 1998 Provides Updated Response to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-387/97-03 & 50-388/97-03.Corrective Actions:Util Currently Scheduling Issuance of All Procedural Revs by End of First Quarter 1998 PLA-4828, Expresses Appreciation for Support Received by Former Project Manager C Poslusny1997-12-29029 December 1997 Expresses Appreciation for Support Received by Former Project Manager C Poslusny IR 05000387/19970041997-12-22022 December 1997 Resolves Commitments Made in Response to NOV Issued As Part of NRC Insp Repts 50-387/97-04 & 50-388/97-04 Dtd 970805. Proposed FSAR QA Program Description Changes,Reason for Changes & Basis Included for Approval ML18026A4901997-12-22022 December 1997 Resolves Commitments Made in Response to NOV Issued as Part of NRC Insp Repts 50-387/97-04 & 50-388/97-04 Dtd 970805. Proposed FSAR QA Program Description Changes,Reason for Changes & Basis Included for Approval ML20203M5741997-12-0505 December 1997 FOIA Request for Copy of Latest OI Rept on Susquehanna Ses Including All Exhibits & for Any Other Communication Between NRC & Susquehanna Ses/Pp&L PLA-4818, Forwards Redacted Version of Pp&L,Inc Corporate Auditings Rept 739459-1-97,dtd 971201 & Affidavit Pursuant to 10CFR2.790 Justifying That Redacted Portions Be Withheld from Public Disclosure.Without Rept1997-12-0404 December 1997 Forwards Redacted Version of Pp&L,Inc Corporate Auditings Rept 739459-1-97,dtd 971201 & Affidavit Pursuant to 10CFR2.790 Justifying That Redacted Portions Be Withheld from Public Disclosure.Without Rept 1999-09-08
[Table view] Category:UTILITY TO NRC
MONTHYEARML18026A3941990-09-0101 September 1990 Requests Waiver of Compliance from Tech Spec 3.8.1.1 to Evaluate Increase in Action from 72 H to 15 Days Re Ac Sources Based on 900829 Borescopic Insp of Emergency Diesel Generator ML17157A2741990-08-0808 August 1990 Forwards Topical Rept PL-NF-90-001, Application of Reactor Analysis Methods for BWR Design & Analysis. IR 05000387/19900801990-08-0303 August 1990 Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-387/90-80 & 50-388/90-80.Corrective Actions:Util Conducted Operator Training on How to Implement Eops If Suppression Chamber Pressure Not Available ML18030A0741990-08-0303 August 1990 Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-387/90-80 & 50-388/90-80.Corrective Actions:Util Conducted Operator Training on How to Implement EOPs If Suppression Chamber Pressure Not Available ML18026A2351990-07-0202 July 1990 Forwards Application for Proposed Amend 132 to License NPF-14,revising Tech Spec to Support Cycle 6 Reload ML18030A0721990-06-19019 June 1990 Forwards Rev 1 to SEA-EE-183, Evaluation of Unit 1 Computer Class 1E - Non-Class 1E Interfaces & Rev 1 to SEA-EE-184, Evaluation of Unit 1 Annunciator Class 1E - Non-Class 1E Interfaces. ML18026A3931990-06-0707 June 1990 Requests NRC Approval to Install Mod at Plant Determined to Constitute Unreviewed Safety Question When Evaluated.Util Will Implement Administrative Controls to Ensure Larger Min Vol Met for Diesel E Prior to Tech Spec Change ML18030A3671990-05-14014 May 1990 Forwards Proprietary Conclusions of Investigation Re Two False Negative Analytical Results from Two Blind Spike Urine Samples.Investigation Satisfactorily Evaluated Samples. Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) ML20043A2461990-05-11011 May 1990 Forwards Draft of Proposed Decommissioning Financial Assurance Plan,Per 10CFR50.33 & 50.75,for Review.Telcon Scheduled for 900515 to Discuss Comments ML18030A0711990-03-19019 March 1990 Responds to Questions Delineated in 900131 Ltr Re Diesel Generator Events That Occurred During Sept & Oct 1989.Draft Procedures for Proposed Intake Air Temp Test Program Transmitted to NRC on 900205.Revised Procedures Encl ML18017A1871990-02-15015 February 1990 Forwards Books 1 & 2 to, Unit 2 Third Refueling & Insp Outage;Outage Summary Rept. IR 05000387/19890331990-02-0505 February 1990 Responds to NRC 900105 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-387/89-33 & 50-388/89-31.Corrective Actions:Rhr Svc Water Pump 2P506B Remains in Inoperable Status Until Cause of Deviation Determined & Condition Corrected ML18030A0701990-02-0505 February 1990 Responds to NRC 900105 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-387/89-33 & 50-388/89-31.Corrective Actions:Rhr Svc Water Pump 2P506B Remains in Inoperable Status Until Cause of Deviation Determined & Condition Corrected ML18040A9601990-02-0202 February 1990 Forwards Schedules That Provide Details of Tasks Required to Complete Activities Re Diesel Generators & Advises of Plan to Have Spare Parts on Site in Timely Manner to Support Each Diesel Insp ML20006B4501990-01-25025 January 1990 Forwards Preliminary Scope & Schedule for Security Upgrade Project.Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML17156B6031990-01-25025 January 1990 Forwards NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for Dec 1989 & State of Pa,Dept of Environ Resources Monthly Facility Rept Form (01-112).Noncompliances for Zinc on Cooling Tower Blowdown on 891228 & for Missed Sample Noted ML18040B2671990-01-0505 January 1990 Forwards Rev 0 to SEA-CW-037, Analysis of B & C 1989 Diesels Failure. Rept Details Util Analysis of Overpressurization Incidents Which Occurred in Sept & Oct 1989 of Diesel Generators ML18040B2651989-11-27027 November 1989 Forwards Response to Generic Ltr 89-21.Table of USIs for Which Technical Resolution Has Been Achieved Encl ML19325F1991989-11-0909 November 1989 Responds to Generic Ltr 89-07, Power Reactor Safeguards Contingency Planning for Surface Vehicle Bombs. Util Has Developed & Issued Procedure Which Includes Safeguards Contingency Planning Using Approach Noted in Generic Ltr ML19325D7411989-10-19019 October 1989 Forwards Application for Amends 126 & 77 to Licenses NPF-14 & NPF-22,respectively,requesting Emergency Temporary Relief from Certain Requirements of Tech Specs 3.2.2 on One Time Basis for Period of 3 Months ML19325C3771989-10-11011 October 1989 Forwards Change DD to Physical Security Plan.Change Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML18040B2581989-10-0202 October 1989 Forwards Final Response to Request for Addl Info Re Generic Ltr 88-01, NRC Position on IGSCC in BWR Austenitic Stainless Steel Piping. Listed Items Included in Previous & Current Ref Responses ML18040A9441989-09-12012 September 1989 Responds to Remaining Questions Raised During NRC Insp of Training Programs.Training Procedure Re Technical Exam Bank Instrumentation & Control Training Exams.Health Physics Technicians Trained Re High Radiation Levels PLA-3251, Forwards Response to Regulatory Effectiveness Review Rept. Util Established Team to Evaluate Appropriate Scope for Planned Major Project to Upgrade Security.Scope of Project to Be Finalized & Approved in Nov 1989.Response Withheld1989-08-31031 August 1989 Forwards Response to Regulatory Effectiveness Review Rept. Util Established Team to Evaluate Appropriate Scope for Planned Major Project to Upgrade Security.Scope of Project to Be Finalized & Approved in Nov 1989.Response Withheld ML18040A9421989-08-22022 August 1989 Requests Concurrence W/Scheduling of 1990 Annual NRC Observed Emergency Preparedness Exercise at Plant on 900502. Concurrence Requested by 890930 ML18040B2531989-08-10010 August 1989 Discusses Insp of Operational Status of Emergency Preparedness Program.Susquehanna Review Committee 1987 & 1988 Emergency Plan Audits Encl W/Other Supporting Documentation ML20246A0191989-06-30030 June 1989 Submits Comments on Containment Performance Improvement Program (Cpi).Believes Program Will Be Generic Approach to Improving Containment Performance During Severe Accident PLA-3218, Submits Info Re Settlement Agreements for Discrimination Matters Arising Under Energy Reorganization Act of 1974. No Settlements Made Between Licensee & Any Employees in Section 210 Proceedings1989-06-27027 June 1989 Submits Info Re Settlement Agreements for Discrimination Matters Arising Under Energy Reorganization Act of 1974. No Settlements Made Between Licensee & Any Employees in Section 210 Proceedings ML18040B2501989-06-20020 June 1989 Forwards Summary Rept of Safety Evaluations Approved During 1988.Changes Include Backseating Control Box to Electrically Backset HV-202168 to Reduce Steam Leakage & Rerouting Condensate Supply Line to Main Condenser Keepfill PLA-3194, Forwards Change CC to Physical Security Plan.Change Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)1989-05-30030 May 1989 Forwards Change CC to Physical Security Plan.Change Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML18040A9301989-04-28028 April 1989 Responds to 890322 Request for Addl Info Re Plant Fire Protection Review Rept.Analysis of Circuits Having Potential for Being Impacted by Fire Resulting in Multiple High Impedence Faults Will Be Completed by Last Quarter 1989 ML18040B2441989-04-14014 April 1989 Forwards Application for Amends to Licenses NPF-14 & NPF-22, Resulting from Mods Performed to Essential Svc Water Sys,Per 10CFR50,App R,Consisting of Proposed Amends 23 & 70 PLA-3173, Forwards Change Bb to Physical Security Plan.Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)1989-03-22022 March 1989 Forwards Change Bb to Physical Security Plan.Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML18040A9271989-03-10010 March 1989 Forwards Rev 6 to ISI-T-100.0 for Unit 1 & Rev 3 to ISI-T-200.0 for Unit 2 Pump & Valve Inservice Insp Testing Program. ML18040A9261989-03-0707 March 1989 Discusses Util Position Re Completion & Implementation of NRC Requested Actions Specified in Suppl 1 to NRC Bulletin 88-007, Power Oscillations in Bwrs. ML17156B0131989-02-0202 February 1989 Forwards Proprietary Rept & Affidavit Supporting Proposed Amend 119 to License NPF-14 ML17156A9771988-12-15015 December 1988 Forwards Rev 11 to Susquehanna Units 1 & 2 Emergency Plan ML18040B2331988-11-22022 November 1988 Forwards Listed Addl Info Re Plant Fire Protection Review rept.W/16 Oversize Drawings ML17156A9211988-11-0909 November 1988 Forwards Proprietary GE Rept, Tech Spec Improvement Analysis for Reactor Protection Sys for Susquehanna Steam Electric Station,Units 1 & 2. Rept Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) ML18040A9111988-09-15015 September 1988 Informs That Mods Re Fire Barrier Upgrades,Hvac Fan Switches,Ct Secondaries & Raceway Wrapping Completed Except as Listed ML18040A9101988-08-10010 August 1988 Forwards Application for Amend to License NPF-14,extending Operation During Cycle 4 W/One Circulation Loop Out of Svc. Fee Paid ML18040B2221988-08-10010 August 1988 Responds to Generic Ltr 88-01, NRC Position on IGSCC in BWR Austenitic Stainless Steel Piping. Staff Position on Matls, Water Chemistry,Crack Evaluation & Repair Criteria & Insp Schedules Among Topics Addressed.Flaw Evaluations Encl ML18040B2201988-07-27027 July 1988 Forwards Comments to Each Specific SALP Category,Per 880707 Meeting W/Nrc.Presentations from Meeting Also Encl ML18040A9061988-07-21021 July 1988 Forwards GE Rept, Susquehanna Unit 1 CRD Housing Cap Screw Corrosion. Rept Completes Action on Item ML18040A9031988-07-19019 July 1988 Forwards Approved Version of Topical Rept PL-NF-87-001-A, Qualification of Steady State Core Physics Methods for BWR Design & Analysis, Per 880428 Ltr ML18040A9041988-07-19019 July 1988 Forwards Rev 39 to Updated FSAR for Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Units 1 & 2 Per 10CFR50.71 ML18040B2131988-06-24024 June 1988 Forwards 1987 Annual Rept for Allegheny Electric Cooperative,Inc ML18040A9021988-06-15015 June 1988 Provides Revised Response to NRC 871130 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-387/87-19 & 50-388/87-19.Corrective Actions:Incumbent Will Be Removed from Emergency Plan Position of Radiation Protection Coordinator PLA-3028, Responds to Suppl 1 to Bulletin 85-003, Motor-Operated Valve Common Mode Failures During Plant Transients Due to Improper Switch Settings. No Revs to Design Review for Original Bulletin Required as Result of Suppl1988-05-31031 May 1988 Responds to Suppl 1 to Bulletin 85-003, Motor-Operated Valve Common Mode Failures During Plant Transients Due to Improper Switch Settings. No Revs to Design Review for Original Bulletin Required as Result of Suppl ML18040A8691988-04-0606 April 1988 Forwards Application for Proposed Amends 110 & 61 to Licenses NPF-14 & NPF-22,respectively,revising Tech Specs Re Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation.Fee Paid 1990-09-01
[Table view] |
Text
'
Endosure iV sn 2 2W Pennsylvania Power & Light Company Two North Ninth Street
- 215 1 770-5151 Harold W. Keiser Vice President-Nuclear Operations 215/770-7502 APR 2 21E Mr. Harry B. Kister, Chief Project Branch No. 1 Division of Reactor Projects U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia PA 19406 SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION NRC INSPECTION REPORTE 50-387/85-28 AND 50-388/85-23 FILE R41-2 DOCKET NOS. 50-387 PII i-2618 388
Dear Mr. Kister:
This letter is in response to a letter dated March 5, 1986 from Mr. Richard W.
Starostecki and supplements the information provided to you in our letter dated November 15, 1985 and at a meeting on March 14, 1986.
In response to your request at the March 14, 1986 meeting, this letter provides the following information for your review and comment:
. A statement of PP&L philosophy for Conduct of Instrument Channel Function Testing (Attachment I).
. Description of the Channel Functional Test's which do not conform to existing NRC criteria (Attachment II).
. Examples of the potential benefits of extending the scope of the monthly channel functional tests (Attachment III) .
. PP&L's experience with relay failures (Attachment IV).
Based upon the information presented during the March 14, 1986 meeting and this letter, it is PP&L's opinion that the Channel Functional Testing in accordance with PP&L policy assures high availability of components to provide an adequate level of safety. The reliability of the components is ensured by the 18-month Logic System Functional Tests along with the monthly channel functional tests.
8607010310 860625 PDR ADOCK 05000387 G PDR l
l i
Page 2 ssEs Pti-26is A R 2 2 886 Mr. H. B. Kister FILE R41-2 To further enhance the effectiveness of our channel functional tests, PP&L will:
1
- 1. Review those tests which are not in agreement with the NRC criteria for testing and revise as necessary to comply with our testing philosophy prior to the startup following the Unit 2 First Refueling Outage.
- 2. Review those tests which are in agreement with the NRC criteria and revise as necessary to comply with our testing philosophy during the normal 2 year review cycle for procedures.
In either of the above cases, the scope of testing will not be reduced from that which is currently employed.
Channels which may be installed in the future will be designed to facilitate testing in accordance with the NRC criteria for channel functional testing.
If you have any further questions, please contact us.
Very truly yours, H. W. Keiser Vice President - Nuclear Operations cc: M. J. Campagnone NRC R. H. Jacobs NRC CTC:krp l
\
ATTACHMENT I PHILOSOPHY FOR INSTRUMENT CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TESTING Instrument channels are to be tested from the instrument (or as close as practicable to the instrument) to the point where the instrument channel signal enters logic, unless this causes undesirable actuation of non-channel devices.
If the instrument channel signal must be blocked to prevent undesirable actudtions (e.g., valve or damper movement, pump start or stop, etc.), the means to block the signal is chosen from the following in order:
- a. Bypass, inhibit or test switch
- b. States links
- c. Jumpers
- d. Lifted leads This order is intended to minimize disturbance of the normal configuration of the channel circuit.
If a jumper or lif ted lead must be used to block a signal, it should be located in the channel circuit as far downstream of the instrument as practical. This point will be determined by an evaluation of the risk associated with accessing the location of the jumper or lif ted lead.
Actuation of the last relay coil (s) prior to entering logic (or last relay coil upstream of blocking) will be confirmed by one of the following indications (in order), if available:
- a. Installed indication, such as: annunciators, indicating lights, audible alarms, etc.
- b. Visual observation of relay armature position.
If neither of the above indications is available, the risk associated with installing test equipment in the circuit to confirm last relay actuation will be evaluated. This evaluation will take into account physical accessibility in the panel, availability and location of terminal points, etc. If the use of test equipment to determine last relay actuation is determined to be unacceptable, confirmation of the channel signal at a practical point upstream of the last relay will be confirmed using the above criteria for indication.
At a minimum, instrument switch contact action will be confirmed.
ATTACHMENT II DESCRIPTION OF THE FUNCTIONAL TESTS WHICH DO NOT CONFORM TO THE NRC CRITERIA There are 28 monthly channel functional tests (13 tests for Unit 1, 13 tests for Unit 2 and 2 common tests) which are not accomplished to the NRC criteria.
These tests represent approximately 10% of the required tests.
The following are descriptions of each of the Unit 1 and common tests:
- 1. SI-151-201 MONTHLY CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST OF DRYWELL PRESSURE CHANNELS PS-E11-N011A,B,C AND D (CORE SPRAY, HPCI, LPCI PERMISSIVE) .
Applicable Technical Specification Paragraphs:
3.3.2, 3.3.3, 4.3.2.1 and 4.3.3.1
Description:
The surveillance verifies the operation of that portion of the channel that provides input to Core Spray and LPCI logic and a portion of the HPCI logic. It does not test repeater relays (E41-K5 and E41-K55) that supply the remaining Drywell Pressure input to HPCI logic. It also does not test the relays (K100AX1 and K100BX1, ref E184 Sh. 5) that provide the final input to the isolation logic for Drywell Cooling isolation valves. For system diagram see attached Figure 1.
- 2. SI-161-202. MONTHLY CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST OF RWCU HIGH DIFFERENTIAL FLOW CHANNELS FDSH-G33-14603A&B.
Applicable Technical Specification Paragraphs:
3.3.2, 4.3.2.1, and 4.3.2.1-1.4a
Description:
The surveillance tests the channel from the input of the first device I downstream of the flow transmitter, through the signal conditioning electronics, to the differential flow switches. These flow switches have two outputs. The first output controls RWCU SYS LEAK HIGH annunciators and is monitored by the surveillance. The second output actuates relays G33-R615A and B, which in turn input to the isolation logic, and is not monitor d.
The test starts from as close to the sensor as practicable and includes the applicable bistable devices. The bistables (FDSH-G33-N603A&B) are dual output devices that are verified by actuation of annunciators as described above. The relays that are not tested (G33-R616A and B) provide direct input into logic and upon actuation would, if not bypassed, result in isolation. See attached Figure 2 for system diagram.
- 3. SI-180-201 MONTHLY CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST OF REACTOR VESSEL PRESSURE CHANNELS PS-B21-N021A, C, E, G AND PIS-B21-N021B, D, (CORE SPRAY SYSTEM AND LPCI PERMISSIVE)
Applicable Technical Specification Paragraphs:
l 3.3.3 and 4.3.3.1 i
4
Description:
Each pressure switch directly and/or indirectly drives parallel pairs of
- relays that input to Core Spray, LPCI Injection Valve or Recirculation
! Discharge Valve isolation logic. In each pair one of the relays leads to
! an annunciator that is checked in the surveillance with pressure greater j than setpoint thereby satisfying the channel functional test requirement.
The other relay in the parallel pair leads only to isolation logic and is not checked as part of the surveillance. Those relays that are not checked are: E21-K32A&B, E21-K33A&B, E11-K35A&B, E11-K36A&B, E11-K47A&B and E11-K91A&B.
When pressure is less than the setpoint (i.e. the switch is closed) the annunciators discussed above, which are actuated by either of two pressure channels associated with that annunciator, cannot be used because the channel not in test will keep the annunciator continually actuated.
Therefore in this case testing is limited to checking proper actuation of a the switch itself. Therefore with reactor pressure less than the setpoint
! the following relays, in addition to those listed above, are not tested:
E21-K9A5B, E21-19A&B, E11-K31A&B, E11-K32A&B, E11-K90A&B and E11-K105A&B.
See Figure 3 for system diagram.
- 4. SI-152-203 MONTHLY FUNCTIONAL TEST OF HPCI SYSTEM STEAM LINE A DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE CRANNELS PDIS-E41-N004 AND PDIS-E41-N005 Applicable Technical Specification Paragraphs:
3.3.2 and 4.3.2.1
Description:
1 Both switches operate similarly. Two normally open contacts from a single l switch are connected in parallel. This parallel pair actuates a relay.
This relay has a contact hardwired into the isolation logic and will, on energization, cause an isolation. The surveillance is accomplished by opening a sliding link connecting the parallel switch contacts of the
{ isolation relays (E41-K33 for PDIS-E41-N005 and E41-K43 for PDIS-E41 N004)
- to the electric power source, supplying a test source to the PDIS and
- verifying closure on high differential pressure. The isolation relays, which if connected would cause an isolation, are not tested. For system
, diagram see attached Figure 4.
- 5. SI-150-203 MONTHLY FUNCTIONAL TEST OF RCIC SYSTEM STEAMLINE DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE CHANNELS PDSH-E51-N017 and PDSH-E51-N018 Applicable Technical Specification Paragraphs:
3.3.2 and 4.3.2.1
Description:
Both switches operate similarly. Two normally open contacts from a single switch are connected in parallel. This parallel pair actuates a relay.
This relay has a contact hardwired into the isolation logic and will, on energization, cause an isolation. The surveillance is accomplished by 2
opening a sliding link connecting the parallel switch contacts of the
1 i
l isolation relays (E51-K12 for PDSH-E51-N017 and E51-K32 for PDSH-E51-N018)
- to the electric power source, supplying a test source to the PDSH and i verifying closura on high differential pressure. The isolation relays, which if connected would cause an isolation, are not tested. For system i
diagram see attached Figure 4.
i 6. SI-152-201 MONTHL7 CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST OF HIGH PRESSURE COOLANT INJECTION (HPCI) SYSTEM STEAM SUPPLY PRESSURE CHANNELS
- PSL-E41-N001A,B,C,D.
Applicable Technical Specification Paragraphs:
3.3.2 and 4.3.2.1
Description:
Each pressure switch directly actuates a relay dedicated to that switch, i The contacts of these relays go into the logic associated with valve isolation. The surveillance directly checks the actuation of the pressure switch; the associated relays are not tested. These relays are E41-K15 E41-K16, E41-K62 and E41-K63. See Figure 5 for system diagram.
l 7. SI-180-203 MONTHLY FUNCTIONAL TEST OF REACTOR VESSEL WATER LEVEL CHANNELS l LIS-B21-N031A,B,C,D i Applicable Technical Specification Paragraphs:
3.3.2, 3.3.3, 3.3.5, 4.3.2.1, 4.3.3.1, 4.3.5.1 and 3.5.2
.i
Description:
The surveillance verifies the operation of those portions of the channels
- that provide input to ADS, RCIC, RHR and Core Spray Logic. Each of the four Level Indicating Switches has an internal switch (one of four in each
- LIS) that drives a relay that, in turn, inputs to the HPCI logic. The surveillance checks the LIS internal switch associated with HPCI but it does not check the associated relay (E21-K34A for B21-NO31A, E41-K41 for
- B21-N021B, E21-K35A for B21-NO31C and E41-K42 for B21-N031D). In addition l B21-N031ALB provide, through a series of relays an input to the isolation
- logic for Drywell Cooling isolation valves. The surveillance checks d
through this series to the final relay (K100AX1 and K100BX1, ref E184 Sh.
1 5), but does not check this final relay. See attached Figure 6 for system diagram.
! 8. SI-180-205 MONTHLY CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST OF REACTOR VESSEL WATER LEVEL
! CHANNELS LIS-B21-N024A,B,C AND D
! Applicable Technical Specification Paragraphs:
- 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3, 3.3.5, 4.3.1, 4.3.2.1, 4.3.3.1 and 4.3.5.1 i
Description:
Each of the LIS's contain a switch that closes on high reactor water level and a switch that closes on low reactor water level. Each low level switch actuates a relay (C72-K6A,B,C,D) that inputs to RPS logic and NSSSS. Within the NSSSS each C72-K6 contact actuates a relay (B21-N6A,B,C,D) that, in turn, inputs to NSSSS isolation logic. The portion of the low level switch channel that is completely within RPS is I l 1 i i I r e--
tested, but that portion of the channel within the NSSSS is not tested.
The high level switches of B21-N024A&C input to RCIC and the high level switch of B21-N024B&D input to HPCI. In each case the surveillance monitors the switch contact directly; however, in three of the four cases a repeater relay (E41-K45, E41-K56, and E51-K48), which is not monitored by the surveillance, is used to input to the logic circuits. In the fourth case (for B21-N021A) the switch contact is directly in the logic and therefore monitoring the switch contact satisfies channel functional test requirements. For system diagram, see attached Figure 7.
- 9. Sl-114-201 MONTHLY FUNCTIONAL TEST OF REACTOR VESSEL WATER LEVEL 1 CHANNELS LIS-14221C&D Applicable Technical Specification Paragraphs:
3.3.2, 4.3.2.1, and 4.3.2.1-1.la(3)
Description:
The LIS actuates a relay which, in turn, inputs to the isolation logic.
During testing the LIS is monitored directly and the input to the isolation logic is defeated by placing a jumper across the relay contact in the logic. This prevents a half isolation signal from being generated due to this test. As a result the coil of the relay (LISX14221C and LISX14221D, ref E-184 Sh 7) actuated by the PSH is not tested by the su rveillance. For system diagram, see attached Figure 8.
- 10. SI-114-202 MONTHLY FUNCTIONAL TEST OF DRYWELL PRESSURE CHANNELS PSH-15120C&D Applicable Technical Specification Paragraphs:
3.3.2, 4.3.2.1, and 4.3.2.1-1.lb
Description:
The PSH actuates a relay which, in turn, inputs to the isolation logic.
During testing the PSH is monitored directly and the input to the isolation logic is defeated by placing a jumper across the relay contact in the logic. This prevents a half isolation signal from being generated due to the test. As a result the coil of the relay (PSHX15120C and PSHX15120D, ref E-184 Sh. 7) actuated by the LIS is not tested by the surveillance. See attached Figure 8 for system diagram.
- 11. SI-183-217 MONTHLY FUNCTIONAL TEST OF MSIV LEAKAGE CONTROL SYSTEM FSL-E32-N654 AND FSL-E32-N659 (INBOARD, OUTBOARD AIR FLOW)
Applicable Technical Specification Paragraphs:
3.6.1.4 and 4.6.1.4
Description:
In both instances the surveillance inputs a test signal at the input of the first signal conditioning device downstream of the transmitter and monitors the actuation of the internal switches of each FSL. In the case of FSL-E32-N659, the only internal switch used inputs directly to logic and as such the testing encompasses the complete channel. In the case of '
FSL-E32-N654 the internal switches actuate two multiplying relays (E32-K27 l
l 1
and E32-K28) which, in turn, input to logic. The surveillance does not monitor these multiplying relays. See attached Figure 9 for system diagram.
- 12. SI-183-219 MONTHLY FUNCTIONAL TEST OF MSIV LEAKAGE CONTROL SYSTEM PSH-E32-N650 AND PSH-E32-N660 Applicable Technical Specification Paragraphs:
3.6.1.4 and 4.6.1.4.c.2
Description:
In both instances the surveillance inputs a test signal at the input of the first signal conditioning device downstream of the transmitter simulating a reactor pressure signal. In both cases the surveillance monitors the actuation of the internal switch of the alarm unit used; however, this internal switch actuates a multiplier relay (E32-K26 for E32-N650 and E32-K30 for E32-N660). that inputs to systen initiation logic, that is not monitored. For system diagram, see attached Figure 10.
- 13. SI-145-201 MONTHLY CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST OF FEEDWATER SYSTEM / MAIN TURBINE TRIP SYSTEM, PDI-C32-N004A,B,C Applicable Technical Specification Paragraphs:
3.3.9 and 4.3.9.1
Description:
The surveillance inputs a signal at the input of the first device downstream of the transmitter to simulate a reactor high level signal.
this signal triggers on alarm unit (one per transmitter). An internal switch of the alarm unit energizes three relays coils connected in parallel. The output of one of these relays actuates an annunicator which is monitored by the surveillance; however, the other two relays (C32-K7A&D for C32-N004A, C32-K7B&E for C32-N004B, and C32-K7C&F for C32-N004C),
which input to trip logic, are not monitored. See attached Figure 11 for system diagram.
- 14. SI-079-217 MONTHLY FUNCTIONAL TEST OF THE SGTS EXHAUST VENT RADIATION MONITORS, RE-D12-N017A&B Applicable Technical specification Paragraph:
3.3.2.1 and 4.3.2.1
Description:
The SGTS Exhaust Vent sensor and converter supplies a signal to the Indicator and Trip Unit. This Unit provides signal conditioning and via a relay card output signals. The relay card contains two relays, one for upscale trip and one for downscale. The downscale relay triggers an j annunciator, which is checked by the procedure. Two contacts of the upscale relay are used. The first upscale contact triggers an annunciator which is checked by the procedure. The second upscale contacts triggers multiplying relays, which input to logic. These multiplying relays are not checked by the procedure. The relays not checked are (ref. E-201 Sh.
12): RISHHX1-0K617A, RISHHX2-0K617A, RISHHX1-0K617B, RISHHX2-0K617B,
RISHHX3-0K617B, and RISHHX4-0K617B. See attached Figure 12 for system diagram.
- 15. SI-079-216 MONTHLY FUNCTIONAL TEST OF THE MAIN CONTROL ROOM OUTSIDE AIR INTAKE - PROCESS RADIATION CHANNELS (RR-D12-R610, RISHH-D12-K618A&B)
Applicable Technical Specification Paragraph: 3.3.7.1 and 4.3.7.1 The Emergency Outside Air Intake Sensor and Converter supplies a signal
- to the Indicator and Trip Unit. This Unit provides signal conditioning and, vis a relay card, output signals. The relay card contains two relays, one for upscale trip and one for downscale. The downscale relay triggers an annunciator, which is checked by the procedure. Two contacts of the upscale relay are used. The first upscale contact triggers an annunciator which is checked by the procedure. The second upscale contact triggers a repeater relay, which inputs to logic. This second contact is jumpered out during the surveillance and therefore the repeater relay (RISHHX-0K618A&B, ref. E197, Sh. 3 & 7) is not tested.
The alternative to jumpering out the contact is lifting a lead in CRE0 ASS logic. Act'1ation of the repeater relay, without lifting a lead in CRE0 ASS logic, will result in initiation of CRE0 ASS equipment in a manner identical to that which occurs on an Emergency Outside Air high radiation signal. See Figure 12 for system diagram.
I*
f 1
A cure *i S~~- 15 -20 La Jiacram '
Ml-E)\-llo RHR EItthen{b(U f Eil-LEA Sheal 4 '
Sheet 5 icrol7 Nel 12. it iz p3.gl.Noll A ic sc PS-Ell-NollC Bl d E//-EM g a IMO INO DSUA DSMk Ell-eleA ,
2-n A DI-KLA DI KitA 944 y a
al Mi-E21-35 Core Sprav Elemen[arV Sheal 3 ' '
IC626 117 _ 2L3 Ell NatiA E PS-Ell-NollC 3 .5
,, gg 9/ INO 2ND + +
/ 2 (W)DSIA b52A Eli-Kuhn EZI-Kin Ell-Kb4 1 7 7 Ezl- VtW. Ell k'i4 g i2I-Kb4 I
MI- E Z41- fo9 WPcr Elemen4 art: .
Y lCle O 7 62lA KSA gaf.rg 8 ' gs v i C2fA- 7 ELIA-
' i M 1rT--INohA) ,
~gl
[LI).gij 4 Dan as I F'N 'O ,
Eck$ ,
el ,
2 s...J EMI KL Eal-g3 faHcLS gat y:.,-
l
. . , - _ .__-_y ,, _ ___ _
_-__r ,
Fic ure i pg 2.
Mi-Ell-fo6 RRR Element 2rL1
$ heel 7 '
shaat 8 Sheaf. a_ aiuse icbis n i2.
95-Ell-NollB IC 96-Ell-Nollb 9 9
,gg mse ,, ,
al-usa ni iz.
Els$ 15e EHMbB si.csl gi.ut,g IChol-2/A /N V
Ml- E Z1- 35 Core 33 ray Elemendart i
Sheet 4
\cto23
' 2c k g 0ng -
E ps-Eil-Noit o 3 EZI-256 9
d zu n s- 6 Ell r4,8 ino:
- .- ,_q -,, s LLeu-xooa , Lszi xce
, i czuma
, a s r
i l
ngurcr-*lg.3 t
i El94 Sh5 (Tuoical er Elco8xC J,
i I,3i-KicnAl d ht Ik6*5'"3#3 d pt i
l BI-KM
- 'k' # I I
le c WS-64tagA T b 'W** I,$x2 gimi b
?"**? ? /ax3 Kimi/L totX5 kl00Al
? KlooMI i
i i
i i
1 (MkimAl (o3x5-Klo0AI
/ /
/ /
/ /
i Division 1 DnMell (coling Division i RBCwl Isblation Idpc! Icolaflo n % :c Inib21ad .T.nitialed l
ncure 4t i
S::- 6 -202 3 oc/ Jiagram Flow Xmtr Flow Xmle Flow Xmfr G53-N012 G33 N0% GG5-N0/JI input o ar o MVI
( o v o y o GM-Kbo5 635-k602. G35-Kbo5 Su rn m er 633- Klo04 Con [lrlhtd by SI-l/ol-262 FD% G33-NbO3A F054 633-Nio03 B
'f. S 'd q
7 l io Ty i
I , I I ,
[\/
i b\ /
.V V RwlCu LEAK RwlCO LEAK ul6 R - Annunc . H16 h-Annt>nc.
I v _
co vAc. g ces-cwuA y ess-Reiss J
Fi6urf*5 S__.c l20-20l 8 ocX, ]lacram (
(
ni-x9al _LEZL-kUA pg EZl-WA I __LJzl G B E31-xt48) El E55A / b2I'N02IO g _
T i EZ.l Kl5B
[ E21-Kt3 A l al-etza Reador law Pressure /l E21-r48 Racc+or lovJ Gumular Waswre far k'02lA,C Ell'kSS-.L Ell-E4l0 l I ciFx4aA ClkZ06 l E21 E18 Od8 T ggg,gqg --
g,gg EIF W411iL _. ._.f 6l-KE A h " " T-Eb-k46 y 628'kB6 Ell-gQl8 EiFR44A Ell- KGOS Ell KID 6 LFG iny. \bke $ l l ! floc.fftiS. M 6M 3 CQac. lBw l.2 Vel of Mi Ell'K 000 Nazg6
~
DrylogIl Pfe' L. V'lub LDu) gl;.gq;g t _L g;l,yggg OL flLS GokuloSe i Ellk47A --
d Ell kla58
[ Ell K448
/\ l V LPC.L . Jalue C ,2.CiLD VrtSS Caac. <L.'bdubtg Y f
CvV Inj Yo\1t $f(MSSiVt g i i 91E!tA C OlKECB
$$ E21 NO2iB f in k!2 A Eil KLB s ( (Ill kdu /tDI EE1 A l
Ell E5tB fil EM6 I freq Gotrol Ca for Lg' f41rC D r.4h. VolV6 .ft)y-Sim,)g E88'26 N0Zi(G, ,
gg,g g Ell-2.16 EllRd5A Ell-d57.6 ~ Ell K!IoA Ell EM6 Ell K516
/\ Cac,rc fre.ss Gdral -
'\/ For Cecirc. Duscivge Sys Z G to Prev, Valve y chcirc. Ihrnozese V l
Acure *4
(
SHSZ-203 Bloc < Diapram i
D95I- "
9 0931 Edl-N006 E41-N006 I to
__ f 1 I
I
, azia Saa E4l-klS i (Teso 541- Kh l @l KIS S:\S'KuS 54Ig22 g4Hzg3 E46 kilo Mt i
i I
Edl-kza/ ; frai.wr 1 I I
i
< E4I-k34 i
l l
1 f
1 i Eat-s2.
l \lolve E41-Foo5 kam fupplu
.aolabon (Outboard) 2We Chulin]
i
-,w-n.,n-.-,aw---n :--,,-e-,--.--------,nnn-., ,-----r,- - . , , - - - . , - - - . - - , . , , , .g..., -, - - - - . - , - --
--m---- - . --r- , -,-we
h M
v
% 4 h co 4 .
'1 -
_9__
to
~p
.n
4 j
T B L h
~t g
w 3 D a
6 "a
Y
--^r a 8
oc 1
W 4
=
1 1
\ " $
m N
=
3 r
C $ - G y
= 2 e /~ -
cc 3 & 8 C G T C \m W m 1 c 'G
- a 9 4 ?a e 33 t w 3 3 x e e % E \ -3 6 L
f1a x $ e a
$u-i C w .s
th 0 w1 s
42 2
- ' 0 6 j,.~ e
~ xa N
$e $ k_ ~: v c N 9 3 i T %j ji e.
a if1 m
~
Gl % fM N 69 h M
'2 N ia s
3 k EE p d 4 Y 4
2 g2 'c a 1 E N "$ 3 d L
'kb 8 i
\ -f D -
Q*
2 e & 6 e 5 1 a ,
1 3 __
- s. f ? 9 1 Y ,s a. y i L d6 2 e = e5
%* 1 as
<1 a uw 5 N +
z 'e w,h 5 N a u hb e U $ 1 2 w N E
^V b 1
l 1
l i
l
. . . _ . - - ._ - - -. l
Aqure 4to 91-120-203 Block Diagram
.Swi4ch l A (ADS-B2U Swikh IFS (Lea Epray Ez0 f21- MM l !82l-Elk /A 621-tSA I _]Gi E1A
, E21-K7A / BZIMIA l Ezi KZA 62"""# gl-ktA '
B21-No3fA E21-KleAl _
22l kI2A
'bM - + EZI-K24A E2I-kkvA ZI-t1A std 621-xm e2i-usa <dzi- e21-kitzA paa Smkh iG ad'd (GHP-Eld tu un l lta.e:A BI-KSA l nit 1A-E21- t1A y Eil-Edda l Cl-K44 Al-KdoA SII ~~
~lil-KEA Dl-beA EIIWh4 -
BFWmh_
al x1a el mA n-na In - o- 1.gon II-KaoA
[
i G><a % ray @a __
62lNatiA Ezi-K.2.aa l l E4N<dl { c:uMe O IS
{ Ell kMB Ewikh2A -
7 EZit35A E41-Ed2. 121 NO*X ElI KM3
_ twza EZI-EMA l
\
- e. - pn ps,-
Figure 47 RT-120-Zo5 Block Diagrath Swikh lA QP5 RPS NSSSS N55SS O f lOI Ei0l$ \, egg.ngy A l az-g<ya 621-KS4 l l 62I-kyl ChJ000$$\ ,
$O2.*VdA l n I 372 KloA ' ' #
diz keA (6VRA cn & gpy cjous Wstl) c,z.yy,g Z tti ISA l I 621-KloA 82lm
[
l 0IA*Ys h72-KI4G '
d21-R6A I 62t us9 t
RAR *.aofabon lane toqic Lith 26 (621-N0Z4Md W Note- .Swskth 26 dWLS I atlwozu on high (lvval 2) RPV
\ an.uazu l Est K4f( f vaaler level l
- Est-e42 l gel KS2
- Swhh 2E C521.N02.t.168b) -
i I
Eu l-K45 821 hlol48 EZl N024b E41 Es6 ,
i
i 00 i 4 l w
t.
3
&~
L.L u
'A C'1 "c w e- 29 m~
CL u - A Esr -
e c
d ,h e ao M k $
W $5 dh 2 s g3 y @d Ec - -
-c_Lc
'L
\c
__ ^w aa U ~*19 N, m,a -
,-g NE d
"N
@m'm u
nn =N khi 1
8$
N h @xd d~
< e i o
i kh ob s 83 i as 4 sJ qLe
,i '\r 1
i l
l l
_. . - ~ , . _ _ . - _ _ ,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - . _ . _ . . , . . . - - _ . , _ _ _ _ _ _ . .
GI-if5-2n Block Diac; ram Ym{r E3Z-W059 Pf E22 N059 E52 CleS4
/
SRui
)
i Ann
($2 hiefJ 4i Sf a
nl Xmlr E32-NOC4 k'z? aL% in altmlar K Igic.
fT-EEZ-Noc4 I
OZ tvlef4 e2NM4 UA##O p ,
- E52 k21 (12 ooc 4 F32 ku I-- -- q r 22-K21 i E2 K27 I i l
) 5:2u4 l its2-E32 k16 l l"
"~~~~'
%ma delaf
"' 7' Y'
Mn [e O Z-N21
<' la 81 81 NITS 4
( *'
e
-F,, ( az.x22 Nah' VL8 u(CU'lftl Is be same as Vt3.
i .4 ,oi i
+
Elfurd #10
- S~-;23-2(, h< bec ra m fPe<2urt Xmer f32-N050
- \
SRu4 {
Sjdstn Inobdion a z.n g a z-xsk l l B2 kSO 7I E5Z.Ns 7 (32 Nittoo O2-k26 1
'l a s q fait [Iori 'Aun$d1 $4f
)MT : 621-fol1C E3A'K2b 232 K30 gg z, .nggo;g,
$,stnilar airainly Cextor Pres Sor G52 NDb0 la]IC 632 K33K 1
l l
i I
I I
i
Acura d it RT- 145- 20 Block Diagram Cn-i400%
i ,
i 1p bkU$
i j
Am c5z m2#
l Opan on high leaal A
)
i ' ' _. . _ _ _ _ __ _ _ ___ * ' ' ctz.xe24 A l Iw io lf
);
_ _ y'_ b B imir- pg C L22 K1G b
-O az wn" qa.xia ggesam
- e,m+,n,9s1,4,,rr,g
, kardtr l
cu rs'P. %iue b ( '
i 1
i 1
1
FiC U re + 1 Z.
- $_b Og C _ p ] g g gg gm J
%< wwur Diz-Noi? A D6r Oll gj tcdt knurt, f- 7 c.,- , I Y
-% h aYd'l$!$E" I l Da-k2 I
d
- '&a~~ 'v I lfff<j bretayard I
'coicabe %d Trip !! nit bi2.-G i7 A Mosz DI2-K2.
1 i
pak knunc.
op a ir f Ap%c.able to SI019-2n only
/ ba ki I/- OsH H-rwtonA B32.gz / / l cantas a on h,au eM (bt2 K!
CliWurz otfol7A Qi[M l te.parn f fJgyf O /\
y __ _ _ __. _ __ __ __ ___ _ ._
$6T5 GM cf Wet f6TG Exhaust Wnt aigh High lation 'cownce.a le Apphcable t.o _9I-o19-2llo only
_4 I I 010'2l l(Di2x8__eleuRoralpf,,Hg,,,ge_
gre on M c Noff'mi gsnt/ h*Id tr,a ca ,
f RTS M Y O Klolf4 EtYkblS5lk t I l
I
ATTACHMENT III POTENTIAL BENEFIT OF EXTENDING THE SCOPE OF THE MONTHLY CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TESTS Pennsylvania Power & Light Company evaluated the safety effect of expanding the scope of the monthly channel functional tests for the HPCI system steam line differential pressure and low pressure isolation logic channels and the high reactor water level trip logic channels. In each case the expanded scope included the first relay energized by the various sensors in these channels.
In some cases these relays are cycled as a part of the current testing, however, relay actuation is not verified. All the relays that would be tested monthly by the proposed expansion are effectively tested every 18 months by the current procedures.
PP&L modeled the HPCI isolation function to determine the unavailability of isolation on demand. The model includes isolation valves F002 and F003 and all instruments and relays in the automatic isolation logic. This model was quantified to allow determination of the unavailability of the isolation function as currently tested and as proposed to be tested. No credit for manual isolation was considered. The unavailability of the logic upstream of relays E41-K44 and E41-K34 (See Figure 5 of Attachment II) is a function of the number of isolation conditions that are generated by an event. There are four conditions that cause isolation: high steam flow, low steam pressure, high temperature (around the steam lines or in the pump room), and high pressure between the rupture discs. Based on engineering judgment, PP&L has determined that all events with public risk potential will generate at least two of these conditions (high steam flow and high temperature). Therefore the effect of the proposed change was evaluated under the assumption that thase two conditions always exist when isolation is required.
PP&L reviewed the proposed test expansion to determine if they produced new sources of unavailability due to human errors. PP&L assumed revisions to the existing test procedures to cover the proposed test scope. Then the potential human errors that could be introduced through the expanded test were evaluated. Based on the Technique for Human Error Rate Prediction (NUREG/CR-1278-1983), no new errors are introduced and the likelihood of the existing potential crrors remains the same.
The results of the analysis show that the proposed test expansion produces a less than 1% decrease in the unavailability of the individual channels, and an even smaller decrease in the unavailability of the isolation function. The isolation function does play an important role in limiting source terms for a HPCI steam line break. However, the Susquehanna Probabilistic Risk Assessment (Rev. 0) shows that all LOCAs represent about 10% of the core melt frequency due to internal events and are small contributors to public health effects.
Therefore the proposed changes are estimated to produce no calculable decrease in the estimated dose rate to the public.
PP&L also modeled the HPCI high reactor water level trip function to determine the unavailability of trip on demand. The model includes the turbine stop j valve and all instruments and relays in the automatic trip logic. Because the !
relays involved in the scope expansion are already cycled by the test, no new human errors need to be considered as a source of unavailability. (The
}
expansion can be performed by monitoring the status lights indicating relay actuation.) The results of the analysis show that the proposed test expansion produces approximately a 40% decrease in the unavailability of the trip function. This trip function does play an important part in assuring that transient events do not evolve into LOCAs due to reactor overfill and overpressurization. However this particular failure mode was not modeled in the Susquehanna PRA. None the less, the analysis of the expanded testing included an estimate of the effect of overfill events on the core melt frequency. Including overfill events resulta in a 1-2% increase in the core melt frequency. The proposed test expansion would reduce this impact by about 40%. Therefore the proposed test expansion produces a small but calculable change in the core melt frequency. Based on the Susquehanna PRA (Rev 0) LOCAs are insignificant contributors to risk, therefore the proposed change does not significantly affect risk. The overall effect of adding overfill events produces a small increase to the core melt frequency in the Susquehanna PRA.
This increase is not expected to significantly change the importance of LOCAs on public health (but no calculations have been performed to verify this).
I t
ATTACHMENT IV j
RELAY FAILURE EXPERIENCE PP&L conducted a review of all Significant Operating Occurrence Reports to determine the extent of relay problems at Susquehanna SES. This review showed 10 events for Unit I which were associated with relays and 21 events for Unit l 2. In all but one of these events, the relays were not associated with any monthly channel functional test which are in question. In the one event, the relay failed in such a manner as to cause the required action to take place.
The relay would not reset.
1 a
1 4
i i
l 1
4 4
e l.
. _ _ _ . . _ _ - _ , _ . . _ _ . _ . . , _ _ . _ , . . . _ _ - . _ - - - _ . _ . . . _ _ _ _ __ __ ., .. _.