ML20245C747

Exam Repts 50-424/OL-88-03 & 50-425/OL-88-03 of Exams Administered from 881108 to 890112.Exam results:48 of 49 Candidates Passed Exams

ML20245C747
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	04/13/1989
From:	Arildsen J, Munro J, Payne D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20245C742	List: ML20245C739 ML20245C747
References
50-424-OL-88-03, 50-424-OL-88-3, 50-425-OL-88-03, 50-425-OL-88-3, NUDOCS 8904270370
Download: ML20245C747 (2)

Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _

[ 4 l

1 c

l l

l ENCLOSURE j i

EXAMINATION REPORT 50-424/425/0L-88-03 Facility Licensee: Georgia Power Company P. 0. Box 4545 Atlanta, GA 30302 i

Facility Name: Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Facility Docket No.: 50-424 and 50-425 Operating tests were administered at Vogtle Electric Generating Plant near Waynesboro, Georgia.

Chief Examiners: ~ 4 CNd% t% Area S'l Date Signed esse e ri)ArerF ^ .

1 nWu J '/b2/51 D.' CharTes Payne Date Signed Approved By: 6 // #/rn%dr /r/ Y./E 88 JoqnfAunro, Chief // Date Signed Ope % tor Licensing Section 1 Division of Reactor Safety Summary:

Examinations were conducted on November 8 - 10 and December 5 - 7, 1988, and '

January 11 - 12, 1989. Operating tests were administered to 49 candidates; 48 of whom passed. Based on the results described above, 20 of 20 R0s passed and 28 of 29 SR0s passed.

70 890417 V$$##l$$CK05000424 PNu

,- 77

.. l 1

, l i

t REPORT DETAILS

1. Facility Employees Contacted:

• K Holmes, Plant Training and Emergency. Planning Manager .

• R. Dorman, Operations Superintendent of Training I

• D. Scukanec, Training Department Staff

• Attended Exit Meeting

2. Examiners:

• J. Arildsen, RII Examiner M. Ernstes, RII Examiner M. Morgan, RII Examiner-C. Casto, RII Examiner

9. Salyers, RII Examiner

• L. Payne, RII Examiner F. Jaggar, INEL P. Isaksen, INEL

• Chief Examiners

3. Exit Meeting-At the conclusion of the site visit the examiners met with representatives of the plant staff to discuss the results of the l examination. l There was a generic weakness noted during the oral examination. The area of below normal performance was in circuit breaker locations. This weakness was highlighted by very limited procedural guidance in this area. The facility had identified this item and procedural changes were in progress.

The cooperation given to the examiners and the effort to ensure an I atmosphere in the control room conducive to oral examinations was also noted and appreciated.

The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided to our reviewed by the examiners.

I

- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _____