IR 05000186/1981002

Partially Withheld Physical Security Insp Rept 50-186/81-02 on 810505-06 (Ref 10CFR2.790).No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Security Plan,Physical Protection of SNM, Security Organization,Access Control & Alarm Sys

ML20215J300
Person / Time
Site:	University of Missouri-Columbia
Issue date:	05/19/1981
From:	Christoffer G, Creed J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20215J138	List: IA-86-421, Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Noncompliance Noted in IR 05000186/1975003 IR 05000186/1976001 IR 05000186/1977007 IR 05000186/1978004 IR 05000186/1979001 IR 05000186/1980003 IR 05000186/1981002 IR 05000186/1983001 IR 05000186/1985003 IR 05000186/1985004 ML20215J136 ML20215J159 ML20215J183 ML20215J188 ML20215J201 ML20215J210 ML20215J230 ML20215J237 ML20215J240 ML20215J243 ML20215J248 ML20215J262 ML20215J265 ML20215J332
References
FOIA-86-421 50-186-81-02, 50-186-81-2, NUDOCS 8610240383
Download: ML20215J300 (5)

Text

_____ _- __

.

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INVESTIGATION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION III

Report No. 50-186/81-02 Docket No. 50-186 License No. R-103 Safeguards Group II Licensee: The Curators at the University of Missouri - Columbia 309 University Hall University of Missouri Columbia, MO 65202 Facility Name: University of Missouri - Columbia Inspection At: Columbia, MO Inspection Conducted: May 5-6, 1981 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection: March 25-27, 1980 Type of Inspection: Routine Unannounced - Physical Security Inspector: _ hj b J.)$-Bt

}c4 G. M. Christoffer Date Physical Security Specielist Approved By: .)

Jh9J.R. Creed,ActingChief J.13-81 Date Safeguards Section Inspection Summa ry Inspection on May 5-6, 1981 (Report No. 50-186/S1-02)

Areas Inspected: Included a review of the Security Plan; Physical Pretec-tion of SNM; Security Organization: Access Control; Alarm Systems; Eeys, Locks, and Hardware; Communications; Surveillance Procedures; Security Program Review; Protection Against Radiological Sabotage; and Records and Reports. The inspection involved 10.~5 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC inspector. The inspection began during the day shif Results: The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements within the eleven areas examined during the inspectio ,

(Details 2.790(d) Information)

8610240383 861010 PDR FOIA BENNISH86-421 PDR

~ - ~ _ - =-- - a - -- ..- - -w

o -

, 1, g w,- s. ,. . . -

.

,,

-.

.

i"f M 24E cENIXUmlawo '-i

.

DETAILS Persons Contacted

• C. McKibben, Manager, Research Reactor Facility

• D. McGinty, Reactor Physicist

• H. Vonk, Reactor Operations Engineer J. Marchand, Administrative Associate J. Watring, Major, University Police Department J. Vandelicht, Supervisor, Watchman Servic * Denotes those present at the exit intervie . Exit Interview (MC 30703B): On May 6, 1981, an exit meeting was conducted with the individuals noted in Paragraph 1. They were informed that no items of noncompliance were identified during the inspectio The. licensee was. concerned about and questioned i when their revised security plan, submitted in May 1980, would be approved. They were advised that the plan is still in the review process at NRC Headquarters. The inspector informed the attendees that the indoctrination video tape, which was viewed by the inspector and is shown to persons entering the facility, is very informativ The continued cooperation between the University Police and members of the Missouri University Research Reactor (MURR) was also discusse . Security Plan (MC 81405B): No items of noncompliance were identifie The inspector reviewed the licensee's approved security plan, submitted by letter dated September 20, 1974, and revisions submitted by letters dated March 31, 1976, November 5, 1976, and September 30, 197 In May 1980, a revised security plan as required by 10 CFR,W.67, was submitted to the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. At the tilne of this inspection, the. revised plan had not been approve . Protection of SNM(MC 81410B): No items of noncompliance were iden-tified. The licensee is authorized to possess 45 kg of U-23 The MURR License No. R-103 expires November 21, 200 . Security Organization (MC 81415B): No items of noncompliance were identifie Interviews with University Police supervisors and a review of records showed that the licensee is adhering to security plan commitmeats-regarding the overall structure and functional responsibilities of the security organizatio In January 1981, a security and facility indoctrination seminar was attended by the University Police and Watchmen. The seminar consisted of viewing an indoctrination videotape which addressed security, emergency procedures, and health physics. Familiariza-tion tours were also conducte During interviews with University Police personnel, it was confirmed that thegyr:1&4Wwould respond to the reactor facility as requiredT ~ Additionally, thet % E G O 9 $ W D % M A c W gWPCYb,,5* TMfSNhD

.:V 1 .;L$. = .J. -

. +$ $ ; q

.

.mumn xx.2*&&kb

%mgmye 9W&4T b .

=.+ .-

.

iu;gneu # " " ", waa m a J:: _

' , ~

• ];h%'

2t?;.5.. C- r--~:

], 2*

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ - - -

,o . : - - i sw.. .3 .

uw-

, rPAhi-2:Hf & m A N

.

{3 7 9 4ould respond as neede The University Police Department consisted ofCfull-time cccmissioned of ficers and y dispatchers. The Watchmen section consisted of ] watchmen and t; 4 ; 5uperviso . Access Control (MC 81420B): No items of noncompliance were identi-fie The effectiveness of the access control system was evaluated by visual observation, personnel interviews, and record revie px Access to the [O8d/Ab,'Oh6%; @6Y mms is limited to only author-ized individuals. Approximately} d individuals are authorized unescorted access, the majority are students working on research projects. Each student has a sponsor who is responsible for the student and certifies that the student requires access to certain areas of the facility. The sponsor is also responsible for informing the appropriate person when the student no longer needs acces t The authorization list forF36.aM4LK is changed at the end of each/ semester. However, if the sponsor determines that an individual no I6nger needs access before the semester; ends, the individual's name is deleted from the list. Pictures of all authorized individuals are maintained in a photograph album located in the control room for the reactor operator to refer to if he does not personally recognize an individual entering the containment buildin All of the staff carry MURR identification card . .

Seven individuals are authorized access to the t gK Q i c -. An un-authorized person requiring access to theg4"2 'pust be escorted by an authorized individua . Alarm Systems (MC 81425B): No items of noncompliance were identifie The'fE'""3F!1T5R,, building is protected by an intrusion alarm that an-nun'ciates in theQQ- f fr and at the continuous 1yV '@_ r -.g F me.'3 'r

i ',

,

The E ..i si:M s protected bv an! w i O d detection unit which is instMied(y/O_ , rg adf3 im O Uand at thee d ~ @C n The unit annunciates :x'M Ain,the f,,,;'.,;; reactor T

"*"W'~i ' room, also annunciates at the g \

e y in'W plocated the'C'3M] [ } building intrusion alarm system is atuvatea only when the $' ~ '

'

j / building isfE -

"3 Fros December 1980 to April 1982, the rMi _ . , 0 building intrusion alarm ..

system had been activatedi_ ~ [duetofacilitypersonnelworking a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, 7 day a week schedul Keys, Locks, and Hardware (MC 81430B): No items of noncompliance were identifie The outer personnel doors of the facility on the north, west, and south sides of the building have no outside key lock Their primary function is for emergency exi Normal entry through the

' '

personnel airlock doors is controlled by a r- . q 3 E _ . lloc This! - T

, M n.,ngea wnen'ever p erson who has th g . s

+]' terminates emnio nent. Access to the, ,

is controlled by a integral C '~ +

,]tothis in the'C _ ._ :( y authorized individuals have the L; 2m a loc It is changed a y untn T_Tmw.r.;m

, A.)r r. r%^ t ! J# , !f l

. . . . . ***'u m,.

- .- >

'

, , i i ; . '. .*g . ' ' - > st a v.~ <

'

,

x -2- - - v 7 ~J g ' s, h

, 3

'

si!3.1$[?O

. '1h.; , _ - wMy

'

-

, whenever an authorized person terminates employmen The' M 8 N k l J,f,@se,:^ 9 was last changed in December 198 The Administrative Associate issues the security keys for the facilit A key assignment list is kept of temporary and permanent facility per-sonnel. Each semester, the list is checked to ensure that the tecporary personnel can st.ill justify a need for the key If they cannot justify a need, they must return the key ~immediately. When a permanent ecployee terminates employment, they must turn in their facility keys. The locks in the facility appeared adequate. The front outer door key was changed December 1980. One/ 6 hwas lost and the licensee determined it was irretrievable. 'The circusstances of the loss prevented possible

' "

compromise of the security key syste 'I Communications (MC 81435B): No items of noncompliance were identifie Communications and response can'be established with the University Police Department by telephones located t the facility or by activation of th The University Police Department'has ommunications with other local law enforcement agencies. 'The police and watchmen carry

.

1 Surveillance (MC 81440B): No items of ncncompliance were identi n s Patrols of the facility are conducted approximately everyEgiMQ by members of the,, reactor staf During non-working hours watcn s rr a P A w M f p m m e ' W W n Patrol -

patroltheareasliewedanotoyndtobeadequag records were rev Anyone entering the building can behquewyn Qtnonitors located in the Mpqyg$ggg'QThe(

R dXvM g j ) entrance is also monitored by %

.

1 Procedures MC 81445E): No items of noncompliance were noted. The inspector reviewed the security procedures, (volume 6), which ad-dressed: civil disturbances, bomb or other overt threats, security communications, incoming package and material cot trol , key and lock

.

procedures, personnel identification, access control and surveillance, intrusion alarm response, patrol procedure, employee security train-

>

ing, LLEA procedures, tests and inspections, records and reports, and methods of review and revision Procedures describing the security requirements and measures for the facility are also maintained at the University Police Department, and each officer is given a copy of the procedure . Security Program Review (MC 81450B): No items of noncompliance were identified. An annual security program review had been complete A memo dated May 16, 1980, stated that the Facility Director had reviewed the 1974 Security Plan. Another memo dated August 6,1980, stated that the Facility Director had reviewed the security procedures (volume 6 dated September 1977).

1 Protection Against Radiological Sabotage MC 81455B): No items of noncompliance were identifie All access points to the reactor core are controlled. , Persons enterine the : . . , a building are monitored in thef. h e f ' < R m M e.ersons authorized unescorted access to'the p s # N N }are personally recognized

• BW.=:w&&f*tNrun:tenC7

-

,

l~ 4 -

.

s hf. $TTG %m gm m. -. -c na W $ L d{ U CIl & 1l1 2 U g-Q R l3 & j] ),

-__ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ '2_00_M._Ure_(Ud__&@WMi ._ .-

,. A',i;M%

r-i , - Mf M MA W

,.

by members of the facility staf f or the operator can refer to a photgrapn album containing photographs of all individuals authorized unescorted acces . Records and Reports (MC 81159B): No items of noncompliance were identifie The following records were selectively reviewed:

Record Date Reactor Routine Patrol November 1980 - April 1981 wr,- .,

,//fi200!c;'lSpecialInstructions '

December 1, 1980

'i and List of Authorized Individuals Persons Authorized for Laboratory October 23, 1980 Access Only

___ , _ . y y . m Physical PlanttRi M W 1%"d-ds

_

A June 11, 1980

~

Unescorted Access List ofPersonsfor( <$;i December 4, 1980 Access --

MUPS. Visitor Log March 1980 - May 1981 Research Reactor Log Book August 1980 - September 1980 February 1981 - March 1981 March 1981 - May 1981 Facility Evacuation Drill December 29, 1980 Emergency Drill (Walk-through) November 7, 1980 Watch Officer Daily Activity April 1981 - May 1981 Log

.s

' ~ T LA'

'

f -

'

April 30, 1980 Test / Drill July 2, 1980 January 30, 1981

$

.

Log May 1980 - May 1981 Spent Fuel Shipment November 16, 1980 November 23, 1980 December 2, 1980 cy: S % %ff 5 r:t;"c;r '.r " ?- N

.. , , _ _ , . ., ,-5n toic.qnaea J'r."8 -

' i ' ' '=

), y C h i -

}

-

. , ~w

", '

.

%

FEB 2 51533 Docket No. 50-186 University of Missouri ATTN: Dr. Don M. Alger Acting Director Research Reactor Facility Research Park Columbia, MO 65201

!

f Gentlemen:

This refers to the routine safeguards inspection conducted by Mr. B. W. Stapleton of this office on February 1-3, 1983, of activities at the University of Missouri (Columbia) Research Reactor authorized by NRC License No. E-103 and to the discussion of our findings with you and members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspectio The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during the inspectio Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and interviews with personne No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified during the course of this inspectio Areas examined during this inspection concern a subject matter which is exempt from disclosure according to Section 73.21(c)(2), Part 73, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations. This information must be handled and protected in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 73.21. Consequently, our report of this inspection will not be placed in the Public Document Roo Enclosure Contains

$ATEGO.ia05 IllFORMATIO!!

.

Upon Soparation This

\x () Pago is Decontrolled

, 62

6 .(

o

\, s

f )

o University of Missouri 2 FEB 2 51933 Ve vill gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspectio

Sincerely, Original Sicacc.' by J. R. /4l!c .

J. P. Miller, Chief Materials and Safeguards Branch Enclosure: Inspection Report No. 50-186/83-01(DRMS)

UNCLASSIFIED SAFEGUARDS INFOR'1ATION)

cc w/ enc 1:

IE Files IE/DRP/ORPB N!!SS/SGPL NRR/DL/SSPB ACRS cc w/ enc 1, w/o UNCLASSIFIED :

DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)

l' I'

': C on t : i r, s S/,FECt'Ai:DS If1FOM A Tl0l{

Upon Separation Tj;;3 Pagc as Dacont7cyggg y,y\ 'M

/ b k .;

'

xm xm 49 i n dl f j,;

Star,Lnar qql a . ,,'hbi) A Ja g.'0 4 /

nn 2/23/83 p6 Cf') O O(U[l s ')

- :y 'MY f & '" t' ~ ?