ML20215J243

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Physical Protection Insp Rept 50-186/78-04 on 780524-26 & Notice of Violation
ML20215J243
Person / Time
Site: University of Missouri-Columbia
Issue date: 07/03/1978
From: Hind J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Brugger R
MISSOURI, UNIV. OF, COLUMBIA, MO
Shared Package
ML20215J138 List:
References
FOIA-86-421 NUDOCS 8610240362
Download: ML20215J243 (2)


See also: IR 05000186/1978004

Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

. . . _ .

/ MCot UNIT E D STATES

,,5A-

  • 'o

,t'

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION .

~ REGION iil -

  • ,e

. .

pr 799 RooSE VELT ROAD

- .Q 4g G LE *n E LL v e. 4LLitvois 60137

o .-

  • ...*

-JUL 0 3 f978

l

Docket No. 50-186

The Curators of the University

of Missouri.

ATDi: Dr. Robert M. Brugger

Director

Research Reactor

Facility

Research Park

Columbia, MO 65202

Gentlemen:

This refers to the Physical Protection Inspection conducted by Messrs.

T. J._Madeda and J. J. Dunleavy of this office on May 24-26, 1978,

of activities at the Research Reactor Facility authorized by NRC

License No. R-103 and to the discussion of our findings with you and

other members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection and

during a telephone conversation with J. Schlapper of your staff on

June 9, 1978.

l

The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas

exacined during the inspection. Within these areas, the l

inspection consisted of a selective examination of procedures

'

and representative records, observations, and interviews with l

personnel.

During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared

to be in noncoapliance with NRC requirements, as described

in the enclosed Appendix A.

This notice is sent-to you pursuant to the provisions of

'

Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title

10, Code of Federal Regulations. Section 2.201 requires you

to submit to this office within twenty days of your receipt

of this notice a written statement or explanation in reply,

including for each item of noncompliance: (1) corrective

action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action

to be taken to avoid further noncoepliance; and (3) the date

when full compliance will be achieved.

Areas examined during this inspection concern a subject

catter which is exempt froc disclosure according to Section

_

Er. clos ure cm. n i c

C 'i I: ' ;'

L{l4.s.'__

,

B610240362 861010 ,, -

FOIA

,

' ~ * "

PDR PDR

BENNISH86-421 c 1

. .

.

- .

.. .

.0, .

.,_

.

.

The Curators of the -

2- JUL 0 31978

University of liissouri

2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10,

Code of Federal Regulations. Consequently, the enclosure

to this letter, our report of this inspection, and your

response to the noncompliance identified in the enclosure

to this letter vill not be placed in the Public Doctment

Room. Therefore, your statment of corrective action

regarding the nonco=pliance identified in the enclosure

should be submitted as a separate enclosure to your trans-

mittal letter.

We vill gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this

inspection.

Sincarely,

J. A. Hind, Chief

Safeguards 3r m h

Enclosures:

1. Appendix A, Notice of

Violation

2. IE Inspection Rpt No.

50-186/78-04

cc w/encis:

Central Files

Reproduction Unit NRC 20b

cc w/o encis:

PDR

D. i 1

,ii .G _

'

"( : ,

1, - 4

C ', 5 .. .

B .

  • * * '

e

  • * ?

f%

E' Q M : m g u-

e

~.a>

RllI RIII RIII RIII

......d h ... RIII

.g.,,.j.......- ] -

........3>.p;

.....

..... ........ ,.....

M t! 1 . n......

"a i w mn* inna s pm . _ . . ....

....._ ,I6/28/78 D. . . . . . _

i

i m 3 L ................ .... ...... _ ............ .. .. . _ . . . . . . . . . . . .

nnc,o,,,uao4n:=>o.iainncuo.,.o ..,,......~,..~,..-,a i... n...