ML20215J243
| ML20215J243 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | University of Missouri-Columbia |
| Issue date: | 07/03/1978 |
| From: | Hind J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Brugger R MISSOURI, UNIV. OF, COLUMBIA, MO |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20215J138 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-86-421 NUDOCS 8610240362 | |
| Download: ML20215J243 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000186/1978004
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. . . _ .
/ MCot
UNIT E D STATES
A
'o
,t
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,,5 -
'
.
~ REGION iil
-
- ,e
799 RooSE VELT ROAD
.
.
pr
- .Q 4g
G LE *n E LL v e. 4LLitvois 60137
o
.-
- ...*
-JUL 0 3 f978
l
Docket No. 50-186
The Curators of the University
of Missouri.
ATDi:
Dr. Robert M. Brugger
Director
Research Reactor
Facility
Research Park
Columbia, MO 65202
Gentlemen:
This refers to the Physical Protection Inspection conducted by Messrs.
T. J._Madeda and J. J. Dunleavy of this office on May 24-26, 1978,
of activities at the Research Reactor Facility authorized by NRC
License No. R-103 and to the discussion of our findings with you and
other members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection and
during a telephone conversation with J. Schlapper of your staff on
June 9, 1978.
l
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas
exacined during the inspection. Within these areas, the
l
inspection consisted of a selective examination of procedures
'
and representative records, observations, and interviews with
l
personnel.
During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared
to be in noncoapliance with NRC requirements, as described
in the enclosed Appendix A.
This notice is sent-to you pursuant to the provisions of
Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title
'
10, Code of Federal Regulations.
Section 2.201 requires you
to submit to this office within twenty days of your receipt
of this notice a written statement or explanation in reply,
including for each item of noncompliance: (1) corrective
action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action
to be taken to avoid further noncoepliance; and (3) the date
when full compliance will be achieved.
Areas examined during this inspection concern a subject
catter which is exempt froc disclosure according to Section
_
Er. clos ure cm. n i c
L{l4 .'
C
'i I:
' ;'
,
B610240362 861010
.s __
,,
-
,' ~ * "
BENNISH86-421
1
c.0, .
.
.
.
-
.
..
.
. , _
.
.
2-
JUL 0 31978
The Curators of the
-
University of liissouri
2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10,
Code of Federal Regulations. Consequently, the enclosure
to this letter, our report of this inspection, and your
response to the noncompliance identified in the enclosure
to this letter vill not be placed in the Public Doctment
Room.
Therefore, your statment of corrective action
regarding the nonco=pliance identified in the enclosure
should be submitted as a separate enclosure to your trans-
mittal letter.
We vill gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this
inspection.
Sincarely,
J. A. Hind, Chief
Safeguards 3r m h
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix A, Notice of
Violation
2.
IE Inspection Rpt No.
50-186/78-04
cc w/encis:
Central Files
Reproduction Unit NRC 20b
cc w/o encis:
i
1
D.
,ii .G _
'
"( : ,
.
1, -
4
C ', 5
..
B .
f%
- * * '
e
- * ?
E' Q M : m g u-
e
,..... ......d h ... RIII
]
RllI
RIII
RIII
RIII
........3>.p; n......
.....
........
.....
.g.,,.j.......-
-
~.a>
M t! 1 .
"a i w
mn*
inna
....._ ,I6/28/78
D. . . . . . _ pm . _ . .
....
s
i
i
m 3 L ................
....
...... _
............ ..
..
. _ . . .
.
. . . . . .
. .
nnc,o,,,uao4n:=>o.iainncuo.,.o
..,,......~,..~,..-,a
i... n...