IR 05000186/1980003
| ML20215J286 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | University of Missouri-Columbia |
| Issue date: | 04/14/1980 |
| From: | Christoffer G, Hind J, Knicely J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20215J138 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-86-421 50-186-80-03, 50-186-80-3, NUDOCS 8610240379 | |
| Download: ML20215J286 (5) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
.
U.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
'
REGION III
. Report No. 50-186/80-03 Docket No. 50-186 License No. R-103 Safeguards. Group II.
Licensee:
The Curators at the University of Missouri - Columbia 309 University Hall University of Missouri Columbia, MO 65202 Facility Name:
University of Missouri - Columbia Inspection At:
Research Reactor Facility Site Inspection Conducted:
March 25-27, 1980 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection:
January 22-24, 1979 Type of Inspection:
Routine, Unannounced - Physical Security Inspectors:
St.
[u n /4 0 4'[/d.k
"G.
M.
Christoffer Date Physical Security Specialist AfM v/,v/ro M.R. Kniceley Date
'
Physical Securi y Specialist Approved By: k. f.
V[V[fd a
W.
A. Hind', CEief Date
'
Safeguards Branch Inspection Summary:
Inspection on March 25-27,1980 (Report No.
50-186/80-03)
Areas inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection of the approved security plan and its implementation relative to the protection of SNM; security organization; access control; alarm systems ;
I keys, locks and hardware; communications ; surveillance; p ro c edu re s ;
security program review; and protection against radiological sabotage.
The inspection involved 28 inspector-hours onsite by two NRC in-spectors.
.
,
Results:
Of the eleven areas inspected, no apparent iters of l
noncompliance were found.
l QQ6 s i. g p e nfA=hidj 7 j
3 {pf.g gef; L.ccy14 8610240379 861010
,Mb )U ^ ^% " - O.
p., 7 ~,
i BENNISH86-421 PDR hy;t,7; *, g *.. ': T
- .:
PDR FCIA
" M' '
'
.. -
- 3. ;. :. :..L.... : :
h
..
. ~.
.n
_~
_ _ _.
.
-__ - -
- - -. _. -
. _..
.. - - -. - _ - _ - -.. -. _
-
p
\\gyMiha,,w am::.C"%7.$.
i agu w ; p ;.n.. -.
" " 'a :-..; J
..
~^
-
.
,
..u v
,
'
DETAll_S i
i 1.
Persons Contacted I
!
- Dr.
R. Brugger, Director, Research Reactor Facility
'
- Dr.
D. Alger, Associate Director i
Dr. J. Schlapper, Senior Research Scientist t
i J. C. McKibben, Reactor Manager D. McGinty, Reactor Physicist
- M.
Vonk, Operations Engineer
- C. W. Tompson, Reactor Advisory Committee
- C E. Edwards Jr., Plant Engineer
- R.
E. Mason, Chief, University Police Department i
l
/
J. Vandelicht, Supervisor, Watchman Service
'
l
}
- Denotes those present at the exit interview pertaining to
'
-
the security inspection.
'
2.
Exit Interview At the conclusion of the inspection on March 27, 1980, a meeting was held with those individuals noted in Paragraph
!
1 of this report.
The scope and findings of the inspection j
were discussed in detail.
The licensee representatives were
!
informed that there were no apparent items of noncompliance.
'
)
l 3.
(MC 81405B) - Security Plan i
I No items of noncompliance were noted.
The inspectors reviewed
the licensee's approved security plan which was submitted by j
letter dated September 20, 1974 and revisions submitted by
letters dated March 31, 1976, November 5, 1976 and September
30, 1977.
The security plan, as approved was written to j
incorporate the r >quirements of 10 CFR 73.50 and 73.60.
}
!
The licensee is in the process of submitting to NMSS a re-i vised security plan to conform to the upgrade rule.
No
'
i changes have been made to the approved plan subsequent to
the last inspection.
'
_(MC 814108) - Protection of SNM
)
!
No items of noncompliance were noted.
l The licensee is exempt from the requirements of 73.50 and
-
{
73.60 since they are below the threshold quantity.
However
)
the license has not, at this time, been revised to reflec t j
a reduction in the quantity the licensee is authorized to i
possess.
i from June - November 1979, five spent fuel shipments were made by the licensee.
J
' qq;;t#y,; r.o ;;.vp'llik b"'Ulh
'
r
.; ? T Aa
' yu r rf I
j Jh,u hli1T ;
I M/dPC m--,,,,-
__,
.
.__-____ ____
m::c.2,C%&im;L.Ll%2LL :%5.'
U N 5 9,L.3 R bin.'vN~S.Ni.w N ~' 1.
9 2
.
,, a
,
5.
(MC 814158) - Security Organization No items of noncompliance were noted.
Through interviews and a review of records it was determined that the' licensee is adhering to security plan commitments regarding the overall structure and functional responsibilities of the security organization.
Interviews were conducted with supervisory personnel of the Universitys' police and watchman service.
Mr. D. McGinty, P,eactor-Physicist, has assumed the position of Alternate Security Director.
This position was previously held by Dr. J. Schlapper.
6.
(MC 81420B) - Access Control No items of noncompliance were noted.
Evaluation of the access control system was conducted by visual observation and personnel interviews.
Access controls developed by the licensee are such as to admit only authorized persons to the facility.
There were over one hundred individuals' authorized such unescorted access.
7.
_(MC 81425B) - Alarm Systems l
No items of noncompliance were no ed.
The, licensee maintains a n a c t i vAf# n t ru s i o n alprm
'
system-for the g & m M @[mf@ofi located (N ;+ m xrv+ ' E The system annunciates 1i1 thet and'at the continuously manned
, A 6 alarm located in tne reactor
,
also ahnunciates at the
. since r
the A building,nas been continuously manned, its intrusion alarm has been placed in the g g > ode.
the time of the, inspection, a test was made of the h At r M ~\\ intrusion ' alarm and was found to be activa ting a
taulty' signal.
The licensee stated that the alarm will be worked on during the next maintenance day, April 7, 1980.
It should be noted_that this alarm is u',ed only k S
so thel M ', 4 _The reactor
~ q, is now in use seven days
/1 i f.g
, g j ],}
a week
)
Dave McGinty called, April 7, 1980 i n formed the inspector that on the above stated date, the y,ands w y ] intrusion alarm was worked on, and the alarm is ~now operable.
,
.
-
'Y.7:: 3 Crir;a. pug &.~~~ %-o, r U,W. M Nd.
W
'
mg.$uy u..
.
+=w-mm
.
_
__ ___ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _
.
.~-
g.p3- - -
.m w.bN3d8$M@dNfhw g}j9h g
,.
,
s 8.
_(MC 81430B) - Keys, Locks and Hardware No items of noncompliance were noted.
The inspectbrs reviewed the lock and key procedures as they pertain to the licensee's security plan.
It was determined that t h e'
' s protec ted by a temper proo f, Only
-
authorized individuals have tha'
o tnis lock.
The outer personnci doors of th'e laboratory building have no outside key-ways and can only be opened from inside the building.
9.
(MC 81435B)_, Communications No items of rancompliance were noted.
Communications can be establ s Police rtmen by means of An alternative met oc,available to. summon the University Police is to activa te the'
The University Police Department has communication with local law enforcement agencies at the city, county and sta.te level The police Departtuent communications center has'6_.
g, capability with police and watchmen on duty.
10. (MC 814408) - Surveillance No items of noncompliance were noted.
Interviews with the supervisor of the watchmen, service, which is responsible for surve(indicated compliance witn security llance of areas;
@ Documentation of patrols conducted was reviewed.
,
plan commit-ments.
It should be noted that the Watchman Service is now a part of the University Police.
11. (MC 81445B) - procedures No items of noncompliance were noted.
The inspectors
'
ascertained that the licensee had available the procedures mentioned in the approved security plan.
It was determined that the operating personnel were familiar with the proa cedures.
.
4-
-
""lq qll/.4%n()YO,mWetA C AMaj.
m Q N_,-..i
-- o u r.. *^j:, W : ' yM ~f }
y:
..
.
D1*
J _%
h_
[h
- _ - -
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _
- - _..
_ _ _ _ _.
_
_.
b o h n co g e,:.u w a u w tw.w-(, l G,8)e.a M % D a.i. a w iro.as-k a a nc e wr.-
~_iv.,, ; j Mth" d.i*:t rL ee._. u.:.s.aek U La 1.L 4. a h/.e
.-
ut
,
12. (HC 81450) - Security Program Review No items of noncompliance were noted.
The inspectors determined through a review of records that the licensee
reviewed the approved security plan and security procedures i.
(August 1979) at least annually, the specified frequency.
13. (MC 81455B)
Protection Against Radiological Sabotage
-
No items of noncompliance were noted.
During the inspection of access control measures and procedures, the inspectors determined that all means of access to the reactor core are adequately controlled l
v
.
a'n uT
.
- !
-
_
_
.. -.
....a.......
.,.,..
.
.
_g
_
%::_ :W-3
-
.
_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _
[pa c-ac
...
o o
UNITED STATES l
^
y 'g.,, J. 'g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION J* J,sp{f
,F r
REGION 111
,
{
eV f
g
?
GL EN E L LYN, ILLINOls 60137
.....
,
l MAY 2 21981 l
(
Docket No. 50-186 l
University of Missouri ATTN:
Dr. Robert M. Brugger Director Research Reactor Facility Research Park Columbia, MO 65201 Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine safeguards inspection conducted by Ms. G. M. Christoffer of this office on May 5-6, 1961, of activities at the University of Missouri (Columbia) Research Reactor authorized by NRC License No. R-103 and to the discussion of our findings with members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during the inspection.
Within these areas, the inspection consisted l
of a selective examination of procedures and representative records,
'
observations, and interviews with personnel.
No items of noncocpliance with NRC requirements were identified during the course of this inspection.
Areas examined during the inspection concern a subject matter which is exempt from disclosure according to Section 2.790 of the hPC's
" Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations.
i l-Consequently, our report of this inspection will not be placed in the l
Public Document Room.
- :' n ur-co
.; y
'n~!O.
ia; 1, % b
,
.a.
csi;cj
.
.
\\
hb
- ATTACHMENT.40NTA I N S p@0
}
.DRI. _L Z20.Ldl. INEd! dial 10L.
3-
___
. _ _ _ _. _. _ _
. _,
i
.
e University of Missouri-2-ytv 9 9 trp i
We will gladly discuss any questions you hwe concerning this inspection.
Sincerely, C. E. Norelius, Acting Director Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection Enclosure:
IE Inspection Report No. 50-186/81-02 (Part 2.790(d) Information)
cc w/ encl:
Central Files Reproduction Unit hTC 20b cc w/ enc 1 w/o Part 2.790(d)
Information:
-
.,.
.
s
..
,
..
C.Ch ri st of f er/so
'N reed h-Fistie igway No ji 5/18/81 N
,
' ATTACHMENT CONTAINS'
PART 2.790(d) INFORMATION
.