IR 05000186/1980003

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Physical Security Insp Rept 50-186/80-03 on 800325-27.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Security Plan & Implementation,Including Protection of SNM & Security Organization
ML20215J286
Person / Time
Site: University of Missouri-Columbia
Issue date: 04/14/1980
From: Christoffer G, Hind J, Knicely J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20215J138 List:
References
FOIA-86-421 50-186-80-03, 50-186-80-3, NUDOCS 8610240379
Download: ML20215J286 (5)
v • d • e


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

.

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

'

REGION III

. Report No. 50-186/80-03 Docket No. 50-186 License No. R-103 Safeguards . Group I Licensee: The Curators at the University of Missouri - Columbia 309 University Hall University of Missouri Columbia, MO 65202 Facility Name: University of Missouri - Columbia Inspection At: Research Reactor Facility Site Inspection Conducted: March 25-27, 1980 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection: January 22-24, 1979 Type of Inspection: Routine, Unannounced - Physical Security Inspectors: S "G. [u n /4 0 Christoffer 4'[/ Date Physical Security Specialist AfM M.R. Kniceley v/,v/ro

'

Date Physical Securi y Specialist Approved By: k. a V[V[fd W. A. Hind', CEief '

Date Safeguards Branch Inspection Summary: Inspection on March 25-27,1980 (Report N /80-03)

Areas inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of the approved security plan and its implementation relative to the protection of SNM; security organization; access control; alarm systems ; I keys, locks and hardware; communications ; surveillance; p ro c edu re s ;

security program review; and protection against radiological sabotag The inspection involved 28 inspector-hours onsite by two NRC in-

. spector ,

Results: Of the eleven areas inspected, no apparent iters of l noncompliance were foun l QQ6 s i. g p e nfA=hidj 7 j 3 {pf.g gef; L.ccy14 8610240379 861010 PDR FCIA

,Mb

" M' '

)U ^ ^% " - O . p., 7 ~ ,

'

i BENNISH86-421 PDR hy;t ,7; * , g *.. ': T : .: ..-

- 3. ; . :. :. .L . . . . : : h

.. . ~ . .n

_~ _ _ _ . . -__ - - - - - . _ . - . _ . . . . - - - . - _ - _ - - . . - . _ -

p i

,

.

\gyMiha,,w

..

agu w ; p ;.n... .u v- am::.C"%7.$

.

~^

" " 'a :- . .; J .

-

,

'

DETAll_S i

i Persons Contacted I

!

'

  • D R. Brugger, Director, Research Reactor Facility
  • D D. Alger, Associate Director i Dr. J. Schlapper, Senior Research Scientist t i C. McKibben, Reactor Manager D. McGinty, Reactor Physicist
  • M. Vonk, Operations Engineer
  • C. W. Tompson, Reactor Advisory Committee
  • C E. Edwards Jr. , Plant Engineer  ;

'

  • R. E. Mason, Chief, University Police Department i l

/ J. Vandelicht, Supervisor, Watchman Service 1 l

'

}

-

  • Denotes those present at the exit interview pertaining to

'

the security inspectio . Exit Interview At the conclusion of the inspection on March 27, 1980, a meeting was held with those individuals noted in Paragraph

! 1 of this report. The scope and findings of the inspection j were discussed in detai The licensee representatives were

'

! informed that there were no apparent items of noncompliance.

)

l (MC 81405B) - Security Plan i

I No items of noncompliance were note The inspectors reviewed

the licensee's approved security plan which was submitted by j letter dated September 20, 1974 and revisions submitted by

letters dated March 31, 1976, November 5, 1976 and September
30, 197 The security plan, as approved was written to j incorporate the r >quirements of 10 CFR 73.50 and 73.60.

}

! The licensee is in the process of submitting to NMSS a re-

'

i vised security plan to conform to the upgrade rul No i changes have been made to the approved plan subsequent to

the last inspection.

'

4 _(MC 814108) - Protection of SNM

)

! No items of noncompliance were noted.

l -

The licensee is exempt from the requirements of 73.50 and

{ 73.60 since they are below the threshold quantit However

) the license has not, at this time, been revised to reflec t j a reduction in the quantity the licensee is authorized to i possess.

i from June - November 1979, five spent fuel shipments were

made by the licensee.

J I 'j yu r rf r .; ? T Aa I

M/dPC 'Jh,u qq;;t#y,; hli1T r.o ;;.vp'llik

b"'Ulh '

m--,,,,- .

__ ,

.__-____ ____

m::c.2,C%&im;L.Ll%2LL :%5.'

,

. U N 5,,9,L.3 a 9R2 bin.'vN~S.Ni.w N ~' . (MC 814158) - Security Organization No items of noncompliance were note Through interviews and a review of records it was determined that the' licensee is adhering to security plan commitments regarding the overall structure and functional responsibilities of the security organizatio Interviews were conducted with supervisory personnel of the Universitys' police and watchman servic Mr. D. McGinty, P,eactor-Physicist, has assumed the position of Alternate Security Director. This position was previously held by Dr. J. Schlappe . (MC 81420B) - Access Control No items of noncompliance were noted. Evaluation of the access control system was conducted by visual observation and personnel interviews. Access controls developed by the licensee are such as to admit only authorized persons to the facility. There were over one hundred individuals' authorized such unescorted acces . _(MC 81425B) - Alarm Systems l

No items of noncompliance were no e '

The, licensee maintains a n a c t i vAf# n t ru s i o n alprm located (N ;+ m xrv+ ' E Thesystem- for the g & m system annunciates 1i1Mthet

@[mf@ofi and'at the continuously manned

, A 6 alarm located in tne reactor ,

also ahnunciates at the r . since the A building,nas been continuously manned, its intrusion alarm has been placed in the g g > od At the time of the, inspection, a test was made of the h r M ~\ intrusion ' alarm and was found to be activa ting a taulty' signa The licensee stated that the alarm will be worked on during the next maintenance day, April 7, 198 It should be noted_that this alarm is u',ed only k S

/1 ~ q, is now in use seven days a week so thel M ', 4i _The f .g reactor

, g j ],} )

Dave McGinty called, April 7, 1980 i n formed the inspector that on the above stated date, the y,ands w y ] intrusion

,

alarm was worked on, and the alarm is ~now operabl . 3 -

W

'

'Y.7::

mg.$uy 3 Crir; u.. pug &.~~~ %-o , r U,W. M Nd .

.

.

+=w- mm

_

__ ___ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _

.

.~-

g.p3- - - .m

,

,.

w.bN3d8$M@dNfhw g}j9h g s _(MC 81430B) - Keys, Locks and Hardware No items of noncompliance were note The inspectbrs reviewed the lock and key procedures as they pertain to the licensee's security pla It was determined that t h e' ' s protec ted by a temper -

proo f, Only authorized individuals have tha' o tnis loc The outer personnci doors of th'e laboratory building have no outside key-ways and can only be opened from inside the buildin . (MC 81435B)_ , Communications No items of rancompliance were note Communications can be establ s Police rtmen by means of An alternative met oc,available to. summon the University Police is to activa te the' The University Police Department has communication with local law enforcement agencies at the city, county and sta.te level The police Departtuent communications center has'6 g , capability with police and watchmen on dut . (MC 814408) - Surveillance No items of noncompliance were note Interviews with the supervisor of the watchmen, service, which is responsible llance of areas; for surve(indicated compliance witn security

, plan commit-

@ Documentation of patrols conducted was ment reviewe It should be noted that the Watchman Service is now a part of the University Polic . (MC 81445B) - procedures No items of noncompliance were note The inspectors '

ascertained that the licensee had available the procedures mentioned in the approved security plan. It was determined that the operating personnel were familiar with the proa cedure .

m

-

4-

""lqQ qll/.4%n()YO,mWetA N_ ,- . .i y: -- o u r. . *^j:, WC: AMa ' yM ~f }

.. .

D1* J _% h_ [h

-_--

_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ . .

_ _ _ _ _ . _ M % D a.i. a w iro.as-k a a nc e wr.-l G ,8)e ~_iv..a,, ; j

.-

b o h nMth" co d.i*:t g e rL ,:.ue w au u.:.sw.aek tw.w-(,

U La 1.L 4. a h/.e

, ut 12. (HC 81450) - Security Program Review No items of noncompliance were note The inspectors

determined through a review of records that the licensee reviewed the approved security plan and security procedures (August 1979) at least annually, the specified frequenc . (MC 81455B) -

Protection Against Radiological Sabotage No items of noncompliance were note During the inspection of access control measures and procedures, the inspectors determined that all means of access to the reactor core are adequately controlled l

v

.

  • !

a'n uT. . - .

-

.

_ _

. ....a....... .,.,.. .

_g _

%::_ :W -

-3

. _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _

.. .

o l

[pa c-ac o UNITED STATES

^

y 'g .,, J. 'g J

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

,

,F r REGION 111

{ *eVJ,sp{f f 799 ROOSEVELT RO AD q g ? GL EN E L LYN, ILLINOls 60137

,

.....

l MAY 2 21981 l

( Docket No. 50-186 l

University of Missouri ATTN: Dr. Robert M. Brugger Director Research Reactor Facility Research Park Columbia, MO 65201 Gentlemen:

This refers to the routine safeguards inspection conducted by Ms. G. M. Christoffer of this office on May 5-6, 1961, of activities at the University of Missouri (Columbia) Research Reactor authorized by NRC License No. R-103 and to the discussion of our findings with members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspectio The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted l

of a selective examination of procedures and representative records, '

observations, and interviews with personne No items of noncocpliance with NRC requirements were identified during the course of this inspectio Areas examined during the inspection concern a subject matter which is exempt from disclosure according to Section 2.790 of the hPC's i " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations.

l-Consequently, our report of this inspection will not be placed in the l Public Document Roo : :' n ur- co .; y

'n~! ia; 1, % b

,

. . csi;cj

.

\

h b

- ATTACHMENT.40NTA I N S p@0 } .DRI. _L Z20.Ldl. INEd! dial 10 ___ . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ ,

i

.

e University of Missouri -2- ytv 9 9 trp i We will gladly discuss any questions you hwe concerning this inspectio

Sincerely, C. E. Norelius, Acting Director Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection Enclosure: IE Inspection Report No. 50-186/81-02 (Part 2.790(d) Information)

cc w/ encl:

Central Files Reproduction Unit hTC 20b cc w/ enc 1 w/o Part 2.790(d)

Information:

PDR NSIC TIC 1- .

-

., .

s .. .. ,

h- 'N reed Fistie igway No ji C.Ch ri st of f er/so 5/18/81 N

,

' ATTACHMENT CONTAINS'

PART 2.790(d) INFORMATION

.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000186/1980003&oldid=3235319"