ML20215E879

Notice of Violation from Insp on 860801-31

ML20215E879
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	10/06/1986
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20215E877	List: IR 05000313/1986026 ML20215E874 ML20215E879
References
50-368-86-27, NUDOCS 8610160011
Download: ML20215E879 (2)

Text

. .

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Arkansas Power & Light Company Docket: 50-368/86-27 Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 License: NPF-6 During an NRC inspection conducted during the period August 1-31, 1986, violations of the NRC requirements were identified. The violations involved failure to properly respond to an annunciator alann, failure to have adequate controls over the erection of scaffolds, and failure to maintain seismic pipe supports in the design configuration. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1986), the violations are listed below:

A. Unit 2 Technical Specification (TS) 6.8.1 requires, in part, that written procedures shall be established, implemented, and maintained covering the applicable procedures recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide (RG)1.33.

Section 1.b of Appendix A to RG 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978, states that safety-related activities such as, " Authorities and Responsibilities for Safe Operation and Shutdown," should be covered by written procedures, c Section 8.7.1 of_ Operations Administrative Procedure 1015.01, " Conduct of

-Operation," requires that conditions which result in actuation of the annunciator system should be promptly investigated and corrective action taken to clear the alarm.

Contrary to the above, on August 13, 1986, the licensee failed to properly respond to an annunciator alarm indicating low level in the cooling water expansion tank for one of the emergency diesel generators.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I.D) (368/8627-01).

B. Criterion II of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and Section 2.4 of the approved Arkansas Power & Light Quality Assurance Manual - Operations (AP&L QAM), requires that activities affecting quality shall be accomplished under suitably controlled conditions. Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and Section 5 of the AP&L QAll requires that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings.

Contrary to the above, the controls for erection of scaffolding were less than adequate in that, on August 27, 1986, the NRC inspector found that a temporary scaffold had been installed in the Unit 2 auxiliary building in the vicinity of the ' A' emergency diesel generator with one side of the golgDOCKooli 861006 o 05000313 PDR

scaffold wired to the diesel fuel oil supply line. This line, 2HBD-103-3, is seismic category I piping.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I.D) (368/8627-02).

C. Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and Section 5 of the Arkansas Power & Light Quality Assurance Manual - Operations require, in part, that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented drawings and shall be accomplished in accordance with these drawings.

Design Drawings 2-CCB-70-H19, Revision 4, dated December 17, 1982, and 2-CCB-13-H8, Revision 3, dated March 26, 1982, show the design configuration of seismic supports 2-CCB-70-H19 and 2-CCB-13-H8 including the specifications for the baseplate concrete expansion anchor bolts.

Contrary to the above, on August 8,1986, and August 25, 1986, seismic supports 2-CCB-70-H19 and 2-CCB-13-H8, respectively, were found not to match the design drawings in that the first support had one anchor bolt with no nut and the se:ond support had one anchor bolt in which the nut rade no contact with the washer.

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I.E) (368/8627-03).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Arkansas Power and Light Company is hereby required to submit to this office within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation if admitted, the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Dated at Arlington, Texas, this ($ dayofQ)tg 1986.

I

_ . .- - - _ _ ,