ML20246C868

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 890605-14.Violation Noted:Licensee Failed to Provide Complete & Accurate Info Re Two Independent RCS Level Indications
ML20246C868
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/06/1989
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20246C861 List:
References
50-313-89-23, 50-368-89-23, GL-88-17, NUDOCS 8907110170
Download: ML20246C868 (1)


Text

, - .- - - - - - - -- - - - _ - - _--.

l ,. ,

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Arkansas Power & Light Company Docket: 50-313 Arkansas Nuclear One (Unit 1) Operating License: DRP-51 During an NRC inspection conducted on June 5-14, 1989, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. The violation involved failure to provide an accurate and complete response. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CiR Part 2, Appendix C (1988),theviolationislistedbelow:

10 CFR Part 50.9 requires, in part, that information required by the Commission's regulations shall be complete and accurate in all material respects. Generic Letter 88-17 requested information regarding decay heat remova'l when at reduced reactor water level, including the means to measure water level.

Contrary to the above, the licensee failed to provide ..amplete and accurate information concerning the two independent reactor coolant system level indications in letters dated January 5,1989, and March 14, 1989, in response to Generic Letter 88-17.

This is a Severity Level IV violation. (Supplement VII)(313/8923-04)

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Arkansas Power & Light Company is hereby required to submit to this office, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation if admitted, (2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Dated at Arlincton, Tex s, this (g * ' day of 1989 3

gagah0 QS e' e 0

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -