ML20149J394

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Response to Generic Ltr 88-02 Re Isap II
ML20149J394
Person / Time
Site: Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 02/16/1988
From: Mcdonald R
ALABAMA POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
GL-88-02, GL-88-2, NUDOCS 8802230031
Download: ML20149J394 (3)


Text

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .

'6 Alabama Power Company

. 600 North 18th Sttset

-*g Post Office Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 352914400 Telephone 205 250-1835 enio ce sident the southem eledic system February 16, 1988 Docket Hos. 50-348 50-364 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Gentlemen:

Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant - Units 1 and 2 Integrated Safety Assessment Program II (ISAP II)

Generic Letter 88-02 In response to Generic Letter 88-02, the attached Enclosure 2 response is provided. If you have any questions, please advise.

Respectfully u itted, n 3 ./

k /

R. P. ficDonald RPil/ JAR: dst-D1 Attachment cc: fir. L. B. Long Dr. J. N. Grace t-tr. E. A. Reeves Mr. W. H. Bradford 8802230031 880216 PDR ADOCK 05000348 4v O PDR 4 .

e i

bc: Mr. Bill M. Guthrie Mr. W. G. Hai rston, III Mr. K. W. McCracken Mr. J. D. Woodard Mr. J. W. McGowan Mr. C. D. Nesbitt Mr. R. G. Berryhill Mr. D. E. Mansfield Mr. J. A. Ripple (3)

Mr. Scott Fulmer Mr. J. T. Brantley Mr. D. E. Dutton Mr. J. R. Crane Mr. K. C. Gandhi

3, .

. 's Enclosure 2 Integrated Safety Assessment Program (ISAF) II

, Response Femat to Generic Letter 88-02 '

Facility Name: Farley Nuclear Plant Utility: Alabama Power Company Individual Contact Name: James A. Ripple Phone Number: 205-250-1868 An expression of interest will not be considered a comitment te particip6te on the part of the utility.

1. Would you be interested in participating in ISAP II? If so, in what time frame?

No - The existing methods for resolution of licensing actions have served well.

2. Do you believe that an industry /NRC seninar consisting of a brief discussion by NRC followed by a question and answer period would be bentricial prior to making a decision?

No - Generic Letter 88-02 provides adequate informa', ion for a decision.

3. Would you be interested in a one-on-one meeting with the f:PC to discuss your particular facility or facilities?

No - Not necessary.

4. If you remain undecided regarding participation, what additienal information do you need in order to make a decision?

Not applicable.

5. Do you have any potential concerns about participating in !!AP !!?

Not applicable.

6. Do you have any suggestiens for progran improvenents or changes?

No