ML20140G437

Informs That Board Preliminary Study of Documents in Proceeding Suggests Prehearing Inquiry to Aid in Consideration of Issues Re Sefor.W/Certificate of Svc

ML20140G437
Person / Time
Site:	05000231
Issue date:	06/17/1965
From:	Bond J US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:	Conner T, Pearlman J, Robert J AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED, GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20140G249	List: ML20140G245 ML20140G279 ML20140G284 ML20140G290 ML20140G295 ML20140G300 ML20140G306 ML20140G312 ML20140G317 ML20140G324 ML20140G329 ML20140G333 ML20140G339 ML20140G354 ML20140G360 ML20140G364 ML20140G370 ML20140G379 ML20140G384 ML20140G413 ML20140G437 ML20140G443 ML20140G452 ML20140G459 ML20140G464 ML20140G472 ML20140G477 ML20140G483 ML20140G494 ML20140G500 ML20140G511 ML20140G536 ML20140G566 ML20140G577 ML20140G582 ML20140G586 ML20140G597 ML20140G602 ML20140G604 ML20140G608 ML20140G616 ML20140G624 ML20140G629 ML20140G657 ML20140G672 ML20140G685 ML20140G703 ML20140G710 ML20140G715 ML20140G735 ... further results
References
FOIA-97-34 NUDOCS 9705090112
Download: ML20140G437 (3)

Text

e y=e* **

• p g # % , UNITED STATCS S ,- _ %

l * * * '

ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION WASHINGTON 25. D. C.

June 17, 1965 e

t- C e t.A AIR MAIL 3 e, p. 2 h-C N$$ E9 d Jules Pearlman, Ecq. '[ 9 N#

General Electric Company 175 Curtner Avenue @N92Q g San Joce, California g ,

.I ut Mr. J. Robert Welsh E

^

President, Southwest Atomic EnerEy Acsociates Box 1106 Shreveport, Louisiana Troy D. Conner, Jr., Esq.

Trial Counsel (

Regulatory Staff U. S. Atomic Energy Commiscion Washington, D. C. 20545 gNo

' eODy Gentlemen: Re: General Electric Company Southwest Atomic Energy Associates Southwest Experimental Fact Oxide Reactor (SEFOR) - Docket No. 50-23 The Board's preliminary ctudy of the docunents in this , proceeding suggests come prehearing inquiry, supplcmenting thoce discusced at the

~'

prehearing conference, which may aid concideration of the issues. It vill be helpful to have brought to our attention the particular portions of the hearing record--as ultimately made, including the posthearin6 pleadings--which provide information about these matters.:

1. In the containment' analyses which consider blast effects what assurances arc derived that excessive plutonium and ficsion product releasss will not occur because of pres-sure or hydraulic or missile impact breaches of the inte6rity of the cecondary coolant loop, pipe tunnel, and associatedi systems and compbnents?

2.

With respect to identifying and evaluating the appli-canto and their qualifications:

a. What are and will be the respective financial, technical, proprietary, management, and operating obligations of GE and SAEA? of Gecc11schaft? of Euratom? of AEC?

b. What conditions and limitations govern the tech- p nical and financial contributions by Gesellschaft forcitself _

j l

9705090112 970505 - -

~ ~ - -

PDR FOIA

• 8 PDR

. . VARAD.Y97-34

. = ~

2

. 2 agt'for Euratom ec indicateti in tne application, $ 2-(b),

pa't (The comp]cte ancuern ulv not provided at S' o;c ,

2?page L )

c. Uhat are the 3 egal 11;nitationc with respect to forcign corporations and indivicuulo referred to on the above application paceY

d. What are the Applicantc-SAEA-Cesellcchaft

" contractual arrangements" there mentioned?

e. In the SAEA-Membero agreement of July 22, 1963:

(1) What are the relevant provinions of the March 18, 1963 Mcaorandum of Understanding with Cccellechaft? And of the anticipated fonnal con-tract, if any? (p. 2)

(ii) Same question un to the AEC-CE-SAEA-Gesell-schaft contract or contracts? (p. 2)

(iii) Ubat 1:.; the status of the contract execu-tion requirement ctated in paragraph 3, page 47 What are the relevant provisions of that contract?

(iv) What are the reprutentative capacitics of D. E. Ackera and E. P, Henneh? (pp. 1 and 8)

It is recognized that i.hc Jomnento now at hand provide much data concerning the forogoing mat:cru, and that the responsen to some ques-tions will provido much of the onlichtenment cought by other questions.

,' We are avaro also that the applicants' propoccd written testimony soon to be distributed promiceu further infonction. A purpose of this letter is to assure that the final record vill include all evidence

and leCal contentions which bear upon the 1suucs to be decided. The parties will be permitted and encouraged to auDaent their -currently pla.'.ned evidentiary and argumentative presentations to respond on the hearing record to the questions herein ctated, and also to such other material inquiries as may be pursued at the hearing.

Very truly yours,

, f~0$

j' J. D. Bond, Chairman v Atomic Safety and Licensing Board I

i, i -

'/ -

1

)

i WITS # FATES W AMEREA i

t' v

AftNE EEEbgr maairur

]

i 1  !

za th. .at.r .c

/

Decket Ee.90-231 l Seatkunst asperiaantal Fast

kide Beester (SEFER) i

! N i I herehr eartify that espies et a 3stner issued tr the Atemte i

Safety and Mosesing Based en June 17, 1965 to Moses. Pearlman, Bolsk and Ceemar le the emptiemed matter beso been served br deposit la the matted Staw mil, air mail, en the fm12setas this seventeenth der of Juneg 1Mfje

Southwest Atomie Emerg Asseetates

306 Pyssedd te13 ding

Little meek, Arhamses l AT15

J. Behart Welsh 1

! Nomerehle Seas Eksesher j County Court Besse j Fayetteville, Ashamses i

i Dr. James T. Meeren i State Realth Officer i Arhamses State Based et Esalth j Little Beck, Arkesses 73300

0. $.

1

.. e -

1 eos J. D. Bend, Chaiemes, ASaL Desed Etsy B. Commer U

gg j Babe & # g,*,$ g -

} F 5

• 5

!2 p.

i 0$ a 5 4

E I. n

. . . . , , , . . 2.

IW

__ - . _ - __ . _ _ _ . . _ _ . . , . _ ,