ML20071A180
| ML20071A180 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 02/03/1983 |
| From: | Hall D ILLINOIS POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20071A172 | List: |
| References | |
| PROC-830203, NUDOCS 8302180452 | |
| Download: ML20071A180 (15) | |
Text
'
( -
W ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY RECOVERY PLAN TRAINING REVISION 1 FEBRUARY 2,1983 REVIEWED BY:
BA PROJECT MANAGER , -
u ,q ILL. POWER PROJECT MANAGERM b12" J -
e u BA MANAGER OF QUALITY AND TECHNICAL SERVICES ILL. POWER MANAGER OF QUALITY ASSURANCE I!M OmM
/ i l
APPROVED BY: '
l i
D. P. Hall saoasso4s2 e3o21o Vice President PDR ADOCK 05000
______-______m
Rev. 1 2/2/83 I. BACKGROUND As a result of a recommendation in the ad hoc Task Force Report dated 2/17/82 for evaluation of trainino proarams, the follow-ina commitment was made to the NRC in Enclosure "B" item 4 of letter U-0420, dated 2/23/82, from W.C. Gerstner to J. G. Keooler:
"A consultant will be hired to perform an eval-uation of project trainina and to assist with implementina any necessary chanaes to enhance our trainina proarans."
A curchase order was issued 3/16/82 to F8M Technical Services (FMTS) to perforn the functions described above. FMTS submitted Report No. TS-104, Evaluation of Clinton Station Trainina Proarams on 4/23/82. This recort identified 15 major areas of concern and made 6 other recommendations.
Additionally, MCAR 03, Project Trainina, was issued 6/23/82 due to deficiencies identified in traininn related to the electrical stoo work, SW 007.
Trainino recommendations were contained in the assessment tean report dated 6/4/82, Items 34/IV.E and 44/V.C.10. These are included in the Verification Team Recovery Report as items 70 a 122 resoectively.
4 Rev. 1 2/2/83 II. OBJECTIVES To evaluate oro'ect training proarans with respect to identified weaknesses and take action where required to assure that trainina programs adeauotely support project requi renents.
l l
. - . - - _ .. - . _ . - = - __ _ . .
e Rev. I 2/2/83 TRAINING REC 0VERY PLAN STATUS J This Trainina Recoverv Plan revision summarizes the progress associated with each element of the plan. The sumnarization is formated the same as the Plan.
Additionally, it must be emphasized that success in meeting trainina objectives on a lona term basis, after the Training Recovery Plan ends, is deoendent on maintainino a strong administration of oroject traininn. Illinois Power recoanizes the benefits from this and is addressina this issue separately from the recovery plan, j
i Rev. 1 2/2/83 i
III. PLAN A. BA a IPC trainina plans or procedures were evaluated with resoect to identified weaknesses, and actions are beina taken to enhance these trainina proarans.
B. Corrective action trainina was evaluated and actions are orinarily beina taken as described in the Corrective Action Proaram.
l C. The causative factors of f1 CAR 03 were evaluated to assure that the BA trainina plan adequately addresses them.
D. The BA training proaram was evaluated to assure that assessment team items 34/IV.E and 44/V.C.10 were adequately addressed.
E. Organizations have developed schedules for completing the en-i hancement of trainina proarams.
F. Schedules for completinq enhancement of training croarams are being monitored.
G. The effectiveness of enhanced trainino programs requires evaluation. -
H. The utilization of BA Trainina Department facilities and systems by IPC organizations was evaluated.
- ~ . . ~ _ _ _ _ - - _- _ -. -_ .-. .- - . _ . -. . -
l .
i i
Rev. 1 2/2/83 i
i j TRAINING RECOVERY PLAN STATUS f
- III.-A. BA and IPC training plans or procedures were evaluated with respect to identified weaknesses, and actions are being taken to enhance these training programs.
t Major Concern: BA and IPC training programs are fragmented and suffer from the lack of centralized training management.
Action: BA has employed a Manager of Training who is
! professionally qualified and experienced in nuclear construction training to direct a Training Department consisting of seven '
4 trainers and five support persons.
- IPC has improved its training administration through issuance of Management Guide 2-1, Administration of Nuclear Training Activities.
This guide incorporates requirements for annual training plans, quarterly schedules, lesson plans, training for personnel who conduct training programs, and independent evaluations of training activities.
- IPC QA, NSED and Startup departments have persons appointed to training coordinator, supervisor, and specialist positions respect-ively. IPC Project Management has not established a similar position; however, a person is performing as training supervisor for implementation of the program.
- IP personnel have participated in various BA training sessions, which cover project procedures / practices, thereby emphasizing the concept of project training. Additionally, i Management Guide 2-1, Administration of Nuclear Training Activities, provides guidance for the use of available relevant training.
- IP is evaluating the organization of construc-tion training activities under a centralized IP training coordinator.
4
Rev. 1 2/2/83 Major Concern: Training requirements for non-manual positions in BA and IPC organizations are not well defined; it is ditticult to monitor the training status of non manual personnel.
Action: BA has instituted a computer-assisted training status reporting system for craft supervision and non-manual construction personnel.
Training requirements have been compiled for non-manual personnel whose duties and respons-ibilities include activities important to safety. This program has been successful in helping to administer the training required by various "Stop Work Orders".
- IP Management Guide 2-1 contains training requirements for departmental personnel.
Major Concern: Non-manual and manual training programs throughout the BA organization appear to be casually organized with few formal lesson plans.
Action: Mandatory lesson planning and use of a management approved lesson plan are in effect for the BA site organization.
- IP Management Guide 2-1 addresses lesson plan requirements.
Major Concern: Evaluation of training ef fectiveness was not evident.
Action: Both IP and BA have requirements for evaluating effectiveness of training programs in the IP Management Guide 2-1 and the BA Training Plan. Evaluation of training effect-iveness will occur in 1983.
Major Concern: All training at the site appears to be very casually planned and lacks a procedurally based review and/or approval of lesson content by the trainers' organization or QA/QG.
Action: Review and approval of lesson plans has been incorporated into the BA Training Plan. Addi-tionally, review and approval of lesson plans is addressed in IP Management Guide 2-1.
Rev. 1 2/2/83 Major Concern: Some inconsistencies are noted between the BA site training program content and BA procedures.
Action: A system was established to require the review of procedures or procedure changes / revisions by the Training Department for training requirements and to conduct the required training prior to issuance of the procedure to the field for use.
Major Concern: The BA and IPC non-manual training program lacks scope. The formal training program should encompass more topics.
Action: BA Training intt~ iewed departmental manage-ment and established training requirments by position. Management identified a greater breadth of training for employees, thus enlarging the scope of the program.
- IP Management Guide 2-1 addresses the require-ments for personnel departmental training and its documentation. Generally, the-implementa-tion has resulted in an enlarged scope.
Major Concern: All areas examined in the BA and IPC organi-zations evidence a lack of a formalized, procedurally based DJT training scheme and the required documentation.
Action: BA has incorporated formal requirements for the administration of OJT in the BA Training Plan.
Major Concern: Facilities devoted to BA and IPC Training are inadequate.
Action: BA Training has occupied new, enlarged training offices and classrooms.
- During the original evaluation of this con-cern, IP site facilities were evaluated as being adequate; however, because of increased staffing and increased utilization of existing facilities this item is being further evaluated by IPQA. Project Management has evaluated their facilities requirements.
Rev. 1 2/2/83 Major Concern: Instructional equipment available for use in BA and IPC programs is minimal.
1 j Action: BA has created an adequate instructional support system.
- During the original evaluation of this concern, IP Project Management was judged to have sufficient instructional equiment based on the use of BA instructional equipment.
Since then, because of increased utilization of the BA instructional equipment, recommendations have been made to purchase instructional equipment for Project Manage-ment. IPQA has also evaluated their instructional equipment needs and have purchased additional training aids and
- - devices.
! Major Concern: There is a lack of managerial development activities available to BA supervisory / manage-
- ment employees.
! Action: BA has not developed a program for developement of supervisory and managerial personnel.
- This concern is valid; however, the professional development of individuals will be considered after higher priority concerns are adequately addressed.
4 Major Concern: BA and IPC departmental trainers need regular contact to facilitate and coordinate training efforts on site.
Action: BA and IPC departmental trainers do coordinate efforts when using instructional resources of another department.
- The administration of project training and re-sources under a centralized IP coordinator is being evaluated.
J 4
1
-._ - -_ = .- .
Rev. 1 2/2/83 Major Concern: IPC Ouality Control Department is in a period of major growth, but no formal training plans were apparent.
Action: IPC has implemented a QC Training Qualifica-tion, and Certification Program. The QC Training Qualification and Certification Man-ual lists personnel / functional training re-quirements and includes Training outlines which address and assist in fulfilling train-ing requirements. Training lessons have been prepared and presented for numerous courses.
Major Concern: The site orientation program for non-manual new-hires is not as effective as it should be.
Action: BA Training has developed a new orientation rogram based on a recently compiled p' Employee Orientation Manual".
- IPC presently has a task force charged with responsibility of developing a Project Orien-tation Program. This program will contain the necessary "first day" training for site non-manual and manual personnel.
Major Concern: In general, personnel identified as trainers had insufficient training to pertorm instructional activities.
Action: Over 100 BA managers and supervisors partici-pated in a series of " Training For Trainers" classes conducted by FMTS at Clinton. This short, review-type program was provided to acquaint BA personnel involved as managers or trainers with the BA Training Plan and basic instructional techniques.
- Personnel in IPC Startup, QA and NSED attended a formal one (1) week course presented by the University of Illinois in the fundamentals of training and training instruction. Personnel in IPC Project Management attended a " Training For Trainers" course presented by FMTS.
l l
l 1
i
Rev. 1 2/2/83 III.-B. Corrective Action Training was evaluated and actions are primarily being taken as described in the Corrective Action Program.
Action: Management Guide 16-4, Corrective Action was issued January 10, 1983. As a part of the guide requirements, the Corrective Action Coordinator is responsible for ensuring training of personnel assigned the responsibility for corrective action activi-ties in the basics of corrective action.
- Additionally, the Corrective Action Program through the imposition of the accountability requirements should provide the necessary involvement of management in the corrective action process.
- A Project Orientation Program which provides first day training for new employees is under development and will include emphasis on preventive corrective action. The presenta-tion will discuss quality and the importance of doing the job right the first time.
III.-C. The causative factors of MCAR 03 were evaluated to assure that the BA Training Plan adequately addresses them.
Action: A system was instituted July 30, 1982 which required the submission of approved proced-ures, to BA Training for determining the training needs prior to issuance of the procedure for use.
- The system has been formalized in the BA Training Plan and BAP 2.15, Procedures.
- The training of General Foremen, Foremen, and craftsmen has increased substantially. Since June 1982 a total of 22 different Training Modules have been attended by craft Foremen / General Foremen. Additionally, the Foremen have trained craftsmen in Stop Work, Cable Protection, Structural Steel, Housekeep-ing, and Socket Weld Marking. Additional sub-jects will be covered in early 1983 to supplement those already given.
- As part of the Project Orientation Program the BA Training Department will provide an orientation program for all craft new hires which focuses on quality at Clinton Power Station and site specific requirements, e.g.
weld rod control, traveler system, housekeep-ing, holdpoints, safety tagging, temporary attachments, etc., that craft must comply with when doing their work. Additionally, crafts will be required to attend an orientation to nuclear construction that discusses 10CFR50 Appendix "B", ASME, & ANSI Standards.
Rev. 1 2/2/83 III.-D. The BA Training Program was evaluated to assure that assess-ment team items 34/IV.E and 44/VC.10 were adequately addressed.
Action: Assessment team item 34/IV.E states in part that: " Training programs for crafts, technical and quality personnel must be formalized, consolidated and regularly scheduled. Training courses must be structured to provide a thorough and uniform understanding of current procedural require-ments."
BA Training Plan Rev. O issued June 24, 1982 provided for formalized, structured, and scheduled training courses. These requirements are imposed on BA Project Manage-ment, BAQA, BAQC and BA Technical Services.
Revisions to procedures are reviewed to ensure that lesson plans are current and that the necessary traini'ng is conducted. The above actions, along with the development of the craft training program discussed in Section C above, adequately addresses this assessment team item.
- Assessment team item 44/VC.10 states: " Expand the site training program to provide mandatory regularly scheduled, formal instruction to craft, technical and QA/QC personnel. This training should address quality and procedural requirements and changes to site procedures
, and policies. Mixed class of crafts, technical and quality personnel can promote unity of requirement understanding and provide feedback for procedure improvement."
The discussion for item 34/IV.E is also applicable to and basically addresses this concern. Although mixed classes of craft supervision, technical, and quality personnel did occur, an established policy did not exist. Therefore BA Training Plan, Rev.1 was issued January 14, 1983 and included a requirement that mandatory training be given to mixed classes of craft supervision, technical and quality personnel whenever possible.
r i . - -_
Rev. 1 2/2/83 III.-E. Organizations have developed schedules for completing the enhancement of training programs.
Action: This section includes a basic schedule which shows activities that need to be completed to satisfy plan requirements. Many enhancements have been accomplished as described in other sections and are of an ongoing nature. These activities will not be treated as outstanding items. However, they will be assessed along with other activities as described in section G.
(
l 1
i i
. _ - . - . _ _ -__ . - ~ _ _ __ __ - _ - _ - _ _ _ , - _ . _ _ _ . _ . _ .
{--
1982 i TASKS I JULY AUG SEPT OCT t SUBMITTED FOR Training RecoveAy Plan """7'^"""
- ' NY "
bAPPROVEC ISSUED COMMENTS III-A Evaluate Tlie Status Of BA & IPC ~***"**"' '*""
Tta.ining Plans 01 P.tocedunes WLill
- Respect To FMTS Concerns l APPROVED Management Guide 2-1, Admin. Of Nucleat Training ActiviLies L)!
I e*
- l IPC Training Procedu.tes Revised. A NOTE: Site Purchasing To Be l Trained Undet P.10 ject l Management Vtocedute.
l '
SA Training Plan Rev. 1 l i
RevLsc BA Subtiet Training l ManuatS If RequLted. l l
Centralize AdninLstAation Of Ptoject Tuttining I l
> Ocuetop Ptcject Otientation I Program l l
Assess Need Fei BA MGMT I Oceetepmentat Tmtining Evaluate IP Ptoject Management Facilities i Equipment Evaluate IPQA Tmtining Facilities COMPLE III-6 Evaluate Cetteetive Action A Y Ttaining h l Management Guide 16-4, Cotteetive Ll Actien l SusM TTEo FOR MGMT. APPROVAL AP l Cottective Action Recovety Plan All A~ iV Co ttec tive Acticn Recovety La Plan, Rev. O y Q OO3
/
1 7" COMPLETE RECOMMENDATIONS
& MAKE III-C Evaluate Causittive Facte.ts Of MCAR 03 To Assute That SA l
Training Adequately Addtesses Them l GUIDANCE ISSUED I. Institute Conttot Of Procedute.s j Te Assute That Requined Tmtining l Is Done Before Issuance Incetpetate Requticment Into !
SAP 2.15, Procedures l 1
I t } 12A
1 I
1983 '
lOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY
)
)
COMPLETE a IMPLEMENT
]_ ,
APPROVED A h I l COMPLETE REVISION I 9 h\ APPROVE START EVALUATION gA U COMPLETE FORM TASK TE E
, FORCE ,I y COMPLETE PROGRAM S IMPLEMENT
\ START DEVELOPMENT QOMPLETE START -
Q C SI'ON COMPLETE 8 MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS APPROVE & IMPLEMENT Y
START APP OW S IMPMMEM N
A eV O fCOMPLETEaMAKE RECOMMENDATIONS APPROV l
PROVED CTART REVISION l
L sAPPROVED ILLIN_OS _ POWER COMPANY AWSTO~ ;
Nuclear Power Program
'A$Y2**""
APPROVED Training Recovery Plan LEGEND' O START EVENT 7 COM PLETE EVENT O DECISIONEVENT R EV. ! lDATE. 2 /2/83 l$HEET i CF 2 l 4
( ,'
ICC2
'( TASKS .
JULY AUG SEPT OCT. NC i
I
- 2. Develop Additional Craf t A 1 Train 0ig Subjects COMPLETE a COMMENT I11-0 Evaluate BA Training Program T I J
To Assute That Assessment Team Items 34/IV.E And 44/t'.C.10 Atc I Adequatety Addressed l
_ l
, l. Item 34/IV.E, SEE III-C, 2, d (l Develop Additional Craf t )l Training Subjcets !
I
- ~
III-E i F Develop i Monitor Schedules A A S"oNs'*#' A Fat Completing Enhancement Of Training Ptogiams PO4 suave LLANCES li1-G Monitot Effectiveness Of A/
Training V1ograms Af tet Enhancement COMPLETE III-H Evaluate Utilization Of BA A Y- A Training Facilities i Systems fy 1PC Otganizations l
l l
I I -
l
i 1983
>V DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY COM.5LETE Q- .
'f""3 v
PLAN COMPLETE u s.
v "
TE!M!Es'v^'"^" "
NA ,v 0 00%"8H>E <v v!? TON >EN
[ COMPLETE COMPLETE INITIAL "v' """"' "
"X^ESE' ATE IF REQUIRED I
l - ILLINO_S _P_0_WER COMPANY i
Nuclear Power Program Training Recovery Plan v LEGEND' A START EVENT V COMPLETE EVENT A
v DECISION EVENT REV.I lOATE:2/2/83 l SHEET 2 OF 2 l a
~ -- -- , . _ _ _ _ _ . . _
Rev. I 2/2/83 III.-F. Schedules for completing enhancement of training programs are being monitored.
Action: Weekly recovery program status meetings are normally held and biweekly reports submitted which describe the progress in completing scheduled activities.
III.-G. The effectiveness of enhanced training programs requires evaluation.
Action: Numerous IPQA surveillances have been conducted since June 1982 which indicate that training has been adequate.
- Additionally, an IPC QA special surveillance of the Training Recovery Plan is scheduled for April 1983. Surveillances and audits provide an independent assessment of the effectiveness in meeting program requirements. However, they do not provide an overall measure of the effectiveness >f the training programs.
- Measures to assess the overall effectiveness of training will be developed and this assessment is expected to be completed by July 1983.
111.-11. The utilization of BA Training Department facilities and systems by IPC organizations was evaluated.
Action: Project Management Department has elected to utilize BA Training facilities on a case by case basis. Other IP organizations have primarily used other project facilities for training.
- Consolidation of the administration of site training is being evaluated. The effective utilization of site training facilities, systems and instructional equipment is part of this evaluation.