|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20199H2771999-01-20020 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Table 3.3.8.1-1 to Revise Allowable Values for Degraded Voltage Relay Reset & Dropout Setpoints as Specified Per Items 1.c,1.d,2.c & 2.d ML20196A0941998-11-20020 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Div 3 Diesel Generator Droop Issue ML20196A1501998-11-20020 November 1998 Revised Pages Constituting Rev 3 to CPS TS Bases,Consisting of Pages Annotated with Rev Numbers 3-1,3-2,3-3,3-4 & 3-5. Changes to Text Identified with Rev Bars.No Rev Bars Included for Changes to Format ML20155A5631998-10-23023 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs LCO 3.6.1.9, FW LCS (FWLCS) for Implementation of FWLCS Mode of RHR Sys U-603088, Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.5.13,allowing Next Scheduled Performance of LLRT of Primary Containment Penetration for RPV Head Spray Piping (IMC-042) to Be Deferred Until Seventh Refueling Outage (RF-7)1998-10-0505 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.5.13,allowing Next Scheduled Performance of LLRT of Primary Containment Penetration for RPV Head Spray Piping (IMC-042) to Be Deferred Until Seventh Refueling Outage (RF-7) ML20153F4201998-09-23023 September 1998 Corrected Proposed Tech Specs Bases Page B 3.8-94 Re SVC Protection Sys ML20237E4191998-08-24024 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs SR 3.8.1.17,revising Acceptance Criteria for Meeting ready-to-load Requirement for Division 3 DG ML20237C3501998-08-17017 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Partially Reducing Load at Which DGs Are Required to Be Tested Per Affected SRs in Order to Reduce Stress & Wear on Machines While Still Sufficiently Challenging Machines to Confirm Operability ML20236X0071998-07-31031 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Acceptance Criteria of SRs 3.8.1.7,3.8.1.12,3.8.1.15 & 3.8.1.20 ML20216B1511998-05-0404 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Incorporating Requirements for Static Var Compensator (SVC) Protection Sys Under New TS ML20217M3351998-04-27027 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Mgt Changes Occurring in Operations Organization at Plant ML20212C6951997-10-23023 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Constituting Rev 2 to CPS TS Bases.Rev Consists of Pages Annotated W/Rev Numbers 2-1 Through 2-14 ML20149J1701997-07-22022 July 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Requesting Exemption to 10CFR50,App a, General Design Criteria to Allow Operation W/Identified Offsite Circuit Condition U-602714, Proposed Tech Specs Table 3.3.8.1-1 Re Loss of Power Instrumentation1997-04-0101 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Table 3.3.8.1-1 Re Loss of Power Instrumentation ML20133F2051997-01-0707 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 2.0 Re Safety Limits ML20133A5951996-12-13013 December 1996 Proposed TSs Re Transfer of Minority Ownership ML20134M3181996-11-19019 November 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Table 3.3.8.1-1, Loss of Power Instrumentation, by Dividing Function, Degraded Voltage - 4.16 Kv Basis & Degraded Voltage Dropout - 4.16 Kv Basis, re-numbering Items in Table & Revising Associated Notes ML20128K0711996-10-0404 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.3.8.1,adding Action Statement & Note Requiring Restoration of Inoperable Degraded Voltage Relays, Rev to Table 3.3.8.1-1 ML20134C1631996-09-20020 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS 3.3.4.1, End of Cycle Recirculation Pump Trip Instrumentation, to Delete SR 3.3.4.1.6 Which Requires RPT Breaker Interruption Time to Be Determined at Least Once Per 60 Months U-602623, Proposed Tech Specs 3.10.10, Single Control Rod Withdrawal- Refueling1996-08-15015 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.10.10, Single Control Rod Withdrawal- Refueling ML20116N1101996-08-15015 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 2.0, Safety Limits, Changing TS to Incorporate Revised SLMCPR as Calculated by GE for CPS Cycle 7 U-602619, Proposed Tech Specs 5.0, Administrative Controls, Deleting Examples Currently Included in Parentheses1996-08-15015 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 5.0, Administrative Controls, Deleting Examples Currently Included in Parentheses ML20113E7261996-06-28028 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Removal of Inclined Fuel Transfer Sys Primary Containment Blind Flange While Primary Containment Required to Be Operable U-602591, Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Utilization of RWP or Equivalent to Control Entry Into High Radiation Area, Clarifying Example Given in TS of Individuals Qualified in Radiation Protection Procedures1996-06-21021 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Utilization of RWP or Equivalent to Control Entry Into High Radiation Area, Clarifying Example Given in TS of Individuals Qualified in Radiation Protection Procedures ML20108C9431996-05-0101 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Implementing 10CFR50,App J - Option B ML20107L0011996-04-19019 April 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Listed TS to Eliminate Core Alterations as Applicable Condition for Which Associated LCO Must Be Met ML20100H7741996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Proposing to Revise TS 3.6.5.1, Drywell, to Allow Drywell Bypass Leakage Tests to Be Performed at Intervals of Up to Ten Yrs Based on Demonstrated Performance of Drywell Barrier ML20100H7901996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting SR 3.3.8.1.1 Which Requires Channel Check for Loss of Power Instrumentation & Changing TS Table 3.3.8.1-1 to Change Allowable Value for Degraded Voltage Function from 3762V & 3832V to 3876V ML20100H8171996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing TS 3.4.11, RCS P/T Limits, to Incorporate Specific P/T Limits for Bottom Head Region of Rv Separate & Apart from Core Beltline Region of Rv ML20100H8411996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing TS 3.3.4.1, End of Cycle Recirculation Pump Trip Instrumentation, to Delete SR 3.3.4.1.6 Which Requires RPT Breaker Interruption Time to Be Determined at Least Once Per 60 Months ML20095G4791995-12-14014 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.2, Flow Control Valves Re Proposed Deletion of Average Rate of Movement Verification Requirement ML20095G5141995-12-14014 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs 3.3.1.1, RPS Instrumentation & TS 3.3.6.1, Primary Containment Dwl Isolation Instrumentation to Eliminate Periodic Response Time Testing of Analog Trip Modules ML20095G6401995-12-14014 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Instrumentation Associated W/High Pressure Core Spray Sys,Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Sys & Residual Heat Removal Sys ML20094D2141995-10-27027 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Changes to TS 5.2.2.e to Revise Requirements for Controls on Working Hs of Unit Staff That Perform SR Functions ML20094D2031995-10-27027 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Consiting of Changes to TS 3.1.3 to Include 25% Surveillance Overrun Allowed by LCO 3.0.2 Into Allowances of Surveillance Notes for Control Rod Notch Testing Per SR 3.1.3.2 & SR 3.1.3.3 ML20085N0621995-06-23023 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Bases,Per TS 5.5.11, TS Bases Control Program ML20085F5961995-06-0909 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Description of Exclusion Area Boundary ML20085J9701995-02-16016 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Enforcement Discretion Re TS LCO for Div 2 DC Electrical Power Sources ML20078Q2931995-02-14014 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs 3.8.2, AC Sources-Shutdown, 3.8.5, DC Sources-Shutdown & 3.8.8, Inverters-Shutdown ML20078N2701995-02-10010 February 1995 Proposed TS 3.3.2.1, Control Rod Block Instrumentation ML20078E9701995-01-27027 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Eliminating Selected Response Time Testing Requirements U-602372, Proposed Tech Specs Requesting Complete Rev of CPS TS for Conversion to Improved TS Per Guidance Provided by NUREG-1434, Improved BWR-6 TS, Rev 0,dated Sept 19921994-11-18018 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Requesting Complete Rev of CPS TS for Conversion to Improved TS Per Guidance Provided by NUREG-1434, Improved BWR-6 TS, Rev 0,dated Sept 1992 ML20076G2721994-10-14014 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Drywell Bypass Leakage Test to Be Performed at five-yr Interval ML20072E6701994-08-12012 August 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Eliminating Requirement to Perform Manual Testing of solid-state Logic Independently from self-test Sys ML20072E6191994-08-12012 August 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Allowing Drywell Bypass Leakage Rate Tests to Be Performed at Intervals as Long as Ten Years ML20072C1251994-08-0505 August 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Requirement for Accelerated Testing of Div 1 DG ML20069Q3851994-06-27027 June 1994 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.4.3.1, Reactor Coolant Sys Leakage- Leakage Detection Sys ML20069N3201994-06-16016 June 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Adding -89 After ASTM D3803 in Testing Requirements Specified for SGTS & MCR Filter Sys Charcoal & Changing Test Temp for Testing SGTS Charcoal from 80 C to 30 C ML20069K8191994-06-13013 June 1994 Proposed Tech Specs to Allow 36-inch Isolation Valve Leak Measurement Be Performed at Least Once Per 18 Months, Providing Valves Remain Closed During Period ML20070N6951994-04-26026 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Adopting Changes Recommended in NRC Re NUREG-1434 1999-01-20
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20209E0551999-07-0606 July 1999 1999 Business Plan ML20206F2231999-04-27027 April 1999 NRC Manual Chapter 0350 Restart Action Plan for Clinton Power Station ML20199H2771999-01-20020 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Table 3.3.8.1-1 to Revise Allowable Values for Degraded Voltage Relay Reset & Dropout Setpoints as Specified Per Items 1.c,1.d,2.c & 2.d ML20206E6281998-12-31031 December 1998 Rev 17 to ODCM for Clinton Power Station ML20196A0941998-11-20020 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Div 3 Diesel Generator Droop Issue ML20196A1501998-11-20020 November 1998 Revised Pages Constituting Rev 3 to CPS TS Bases,Consisting of Pages Annotated with Rev Numbers 3-1,3-2,3-3,3-4 & 3-5. Changes to Text Identified with Rev Bars.No Rev Bars Included for Changes to Format ML20155A5631998-10-23023 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs LCO 3.6.1.9, FW LCS (FWLCS) for Implementation of FWLCS Mode of RHR Sys U-603088, Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.5.13,allowing Next Scheduled Performance of LLRT of Primary Containment Penetration for RPV Head Spray Piping (IMC-042) to Be Deferred Until Seventh Refueling Outage (RF-7)1998-10-0505 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.5.13,allowing Next Scheduled Performance of LLRT of Primary Containment Penetration for RPV Head Spray Piping (IMC-042) to Be Deferred Until Seventh Refueling Outage (RF-7) ML20153F4201998-09-23023 September 1998 Corrected Proposed Tech Specs Bases Page B 3.8-94 Re SVC Protection Sys ML20237E4191998-08-24024 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs SR 3.8.1.17,revising Acceptance Criteria for Meeting ready-to-load Requirement for Division 3 DG ML20237C3501998-08-17017 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Partially Reducing Load at Which DGs Are Required to Be Tested Per Affected SRs in Order to Reduce Stress & Wear on Machines While Still Sufficiently Challenging Machines to Confirm Operability ML20236X0071998-07-31031 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Acceptance Criteria of SRs 3.8.1.7,3.8.1.12,3.8.1.15 & 3.8.1.20 ML20236Q4661998-07-17017 July 1998 Rev 0 to Procedure 2800.93, Emergency Reserve Auxiliary Transformer Integrated Test ML20236Q4651998-07-17017 July 1998 Rev 0 to Procedure 2800.92, Emergency Reserve Auxiliary Transformer Integrated Test ML20236Q4571998-07-17017 July 1998 Rev 0 to Procedure 2800.91, Emergency Reserve Auxiliary Transformer Test ML20216B1511998-05-0404 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Incorporating Requirements for Static Var Compensator (SVC) Protection Sys Under New TS ML20217M3351998-04-27027 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Mgt Changes Occurring in Operations Organization at Plant ML20203D5651998-02-19019 February 1998 Plan for Excellence ML20212C6951997-10-23023 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Constituting Rev 2 to CPS TS Bases.Rev Consists of Pages Annotated W/Rev Numbers 2-1 Through 2-14 ML20149J1701997-07-22022 July 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Requesting Exemption to 10CFR50,App a, General Design Criteria to Allow Operation W/Identified Offsite Circuit Condition ML20149H8991997-06-30030 June 1997 CPS Long Term Improvement Plan U-602714, Proposed Tech Specs Table 3.3.8.1-1 Re Loss of Power Instrumentation1997-04-0101 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Table 3.3.8.1-1 Re Loss of Power Instrumentation ML20133F2051997-01-0707 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 2.0 Re Safety Limits ML20133A5951996-12-13013 December 1996 Proposed TSs Re Transfer of Minority Ownership ML20134M3181996-11-19019 November 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Table 3.3.8.1-1, Loss of Power Instrumentation, by Dividing Function, Degraded Voltage - 4.16 Kv Basis & Degraded Voltage Dropout - 4.16 Kv Basis, re-numbering Items in Table & Revising Associated Notes ML20128K0711996-10-0404 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.3.8.1,adding Action Statement & Note Requiring Restoration of Inoperable Degraded Voltage Relays, Rev to Table 3.3.8.1-1 ML20134C1631996-09-20020 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS 3.3.4.1, End of Cycle Recirculation Pump Trip Instrumentation, to Delete SR 3.3.4.1.6 Which Requires RPT Breaker Interruption Time to Be Determined at Least Once Per 60 Months ML20116N1101996-08-15015 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 2.0, Safety Limits, Changing TS to Incorporate Revised SLMCPR as Calculated by GE for CPS Cycle 7 U-602619, Proposed Tech Specs 5.0, Administrative Controls, Deleting Examples Currently Included in Parentheses1996-08-15015 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 5.0, Administrative Controls, Deleting Examples Currently Included in Parentheses U-602623, Proposed Tech Specs 3.10.10, Single Control Rod Withdrawal- Refueling1996-08-15015 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.10.10, Single Control Rod Withdrawal- Refueling ML20137A1101996-08-14014 August 1996 Rev 19 to App V Second 10-Yr Interval Pump & Valve Testing Program Plan ML20137A1021996-07-10010 July 1996 Rev 5 to App IV Second 10-Yr Interval Inservice Exam Plan ML20113E7261996-06-28028 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Removal of Inclined Fuel Transfer Sys Primary Containment Blind Flange While Primary Containment Required to Be Operable U-602591, Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Utilization of RWP or Equivalent to Control Entry Into High Radiation Area, Clarifying Example Given in TS of Individuals Qualified in Radiation Protection Procedures1996-06-21021 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Utilization of RWP or Equivalent to Control Entry Into High Radiation Area, Clarifying Example Given in TS of Individuals Qualified in Radiation Protection Procedures ML20108C9431996-05-0101 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Implementing 10CFR50,App J - Option B ML20107L0011996-04-19019 April 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Listed TS to Eliminate Core Alterations as Applicable Condition for Which Associated LCO Must Be Met ML20100H8411996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing TS 3.3.4.1, End of Cycle Recirculation Pump Trip Instrumentation, to Delete SR 3.3.4.1.6 Which Requires RPT Breaker Interruption Time to Be Determined at Least Once Per 60 Months ML20100H7901996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting SR 3.3.8.1.1 Which Requires Channel Check for Loss of Power Instrumentation & Changing TS Table 3.3.8.1-1 to Change Allowable Value for Degraded Voltage Function from 3762V & 3832V to 3876V ML20100H8171996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing TS 3.4.11, RCS P/T Limits, to Incorporate Specific P/T Limits for Bottom Head Region of Rv Separate & Apart from Core Beltline Region of Rv ML20100H7741996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Proposing to Revise TS 3.6.5.1, Drywell, to Allow Drywell Bypass Leakage Tests to Be Performed at Intervals of Up to Ten Yrs Based on Demonstrated Performance of Drywell Barrier ML20095G5141995-12-14014 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs 3.3.1.1, RPS Instrumentation & TS 3.3.6.1, Primary Containment Dwl Isolation Instrumentation to Eliminate Periodic Response Time Testing of Analog Trip Modules ML20095G6401995-12-14014 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Instrumentation Associated W/High Pressure Core Spray Sys,Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Sys & Residual Heat Removal Sys ML20095G4791995-12-14014 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.2, Flow Control Valves Re Proposed Deletion of Average Rate of Movement Verification Requirement ML20117E3001995-11-0606 November 1995 Rev 18 to App V Pump & Valve Testing Program Plan ML20094D2031995-10-27027 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Consiting of Changes to TS 3.1.3 to Include 25% Surveillance Overrun Allowed by LCO 3.0.2 Into Allowances of Surveillance Notes for Control Rod Notch Testing Per SR 3.1.3.2 & SR 3.1.3.3 ML20094D2141995-10-27027 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Changes to TS 5.2.2.e to Revise Requirements for Controls on Working Hs of Unit Staff That Perform SR Functions ML20085N0621995-06-23023 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Bases,Per TS 5.5.11, TS Bases Control Program ML20085F5961995-06-0909 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Description of Exclusion Area Boundary ML20087J5691995-05-17017 May 1995 Rev 17 to App V, Pump & Valve Testing Program Plan of CPS ISI Program Manual ML20085J9701995-02-16016 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Enforcement Discretion Re TS LCO for Div 2 DC Electrical Power Sources 1999-07-06
[Table view] |
Text
- - - - - - - - - - -- -
t Attachment 3 to U-603043 LS-98-005 Page 1 of 5 Marked-Up Pages from the Technical Specifications 9808070046 980731"~
PDR ADOCK 05000461 P PDR,
AC Sources-Operating k 3.8.1 1 l
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)
SURVEILLANCE FREdUENCY l
SR 3.8.1.7 A(a_' ["J
.------------------NOTE------------------ l All DG starts may be preceded by an engine '
prelube period. '
Verify each DG star s fr tandby 184 days condition and achieve s 12 seconds, # fgg4 a 3svoV voltage h 3870 V and s 45 0 V and frequency r f",D'*3 a 58.8 Hz and s 61.2 Hz.
h SD.B Ha; anel 1 h. %1L *sAste. )
< J SR 3.8.1.8 ------------------NOTE--------------------
This Surveillance shall not be performed in MODE 1 or 2. However, credit may be taken for unplanned events that sat-isfy this SR. -
l Verify automatic and manual transfer of 18 months I unit power supply from the normal offsite circuit to the alternate offsite circuit.
i SR 3.8.1.9 -----------------NOTES--------------------
- 1. This Surveillance shall not be performed in MODE 1 or 2. However, l credit may be taken for unplanned events that satisfy this SR.
- 2. If performed with DG synchronized with offsite power, it shall be performed at a power factor s 0.9.
Verify each DG rejec'ts a load greater than 18 months or equal to its associated single largest post accident load and following load rejection, the engine speed is maintained less than nominal plus 75% of the difference between nominal speed and the overspeed trip setpoint or 15% above nominal, whichever is lower.
(continued)
CLINTON 3.8-6 Amendment No. 110
()
gg gources-@perating
. 3.8.1 !
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)
. SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.8.1.12 -------------------NOTES-------------------
- 1. All DG starts may be preceded by an ,
engine prelube period. I
- 2. This Surveillance shall not be performed in MODE.1 or 2. However, credit may be taken for unplanned events that satisfy this SR. ,
Verify on an actual or' simulated Emergency 18 months l Core Cooling System (ECCS) initiation signal each DG auto-starts from standby condition and: !
- a. In s 12 seconds after auto-start and 1 during tests. achieves voltage a 3870 gg {
V and A458%jg; L{* W*"'Y >b,9 '
- b. Iyt s 12 ng t conds_hterauth-starthnD s_,fjthievesgrequency [s,bda s44' " S 2 58.8 Hz and s 61.2 Hz; ana
- c. Operates for a 5 minutes. (I>45803610 V an AV and i )
SR ,3.8.1.13 ------------------NOTE-------------------- '
This Surveillance shall not be performed in HODE 1, 2, or 3. However, credit may be taken for unplanned events that satisfy this SR.
Verify each DG's automatic trips are 18 months bypassed on an actual or simulated ECCS initiation signal except:
- a. Engine overspeed;
- b. Generator differential current; and
- c. Overcrank for OG 1A and DG 18. !
l I
l' (continued)
CLINTON 3.8-9 Amendment No.110 l
AC Sources-0perating
, 3.8.1 SURVEILLANCE' REQUIREMENTS (continued)
SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY
,-)
SR 3.8.1.14 -------------------NOTES-------------------
- 1. Momentary transients outside the load
. and power factor ranges do not .
invalidate this test.
- 2. This Surveillance shall not be performed in MODE 1 or 2. However, credit may be taken for unplanned events that satisfy this SR.
Verify each DG operating at a power factor 18 months
- s 0.9 operates for a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />s
- a. For 2 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> loaded a 4256 kW for DG I 1A, a 4263 kW for DG IB, and a 2420 kW !
for DG IC; and
- b. For the remaining hours of the test loaded a 3869 kW for DG 1A, a 3875 kW for DG IB, and a 2200 kW for DG IC.
SR 3.8.1.15 ------------------NOTES------------------- '
- l. This Surveillance shall be performed within 5 minutes of shutting down the {
DG after the DG has operated a 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> i loaded a 3869 kW for DG 1A, a 3875 kW for DG IB, ar.d a 2200'kW for DG IC.
y" and frgon9 load range do not invalidate this
- A' h 58.8 Hz.; anj test. i l
- 2. All DG starts may be preceded by an (b* 3 d*p") engine prelube period.
Verify each DG starts and achieve in 18 months s 12 seconds,4 voltage a 3870 V and 80 V a'nd frequency a 58.8 Hz and s 61.2 Hz.
(continued)
CLINTON 3.8-10 Amendment'No. 110 0
, AC Sources-0perating 3 . 8.1 .
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)
SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY kc -)
SR 3.8.1.20 -------------------NOTE--------------------
r* - 7 ,
All DG starts may be preceded by an engine prelube period.
i
. A. Inj Verify, when started simultaneously om 10 years standby condition, each DG achieve , n s 12 seconds avoltage a 3870 V and 80 V
! and frequencf a 58.8 Hz and s 61.2 Hz.
vehge h 387o V a.aJ fre goanc3 B 58 8 Hm; and)
/
\
t s. s4 u. >
O s
l l
i CLINTON 3.8-14 Amendment No.110 0
_____w
- Attachment 4 to U-603043 LS-98-005 Page 1 of 6 f
Attached Marked-Up Pages of the Technical Specification Bases 1
I i
1 1
- ---____a
. AC Sources-0perating 8 3.8.1 BASES ,
{ ]
SURVEILLANCE SR 3.8.1.2 and SR 3.8.1.7 (continued) ;
REQUIREMENTS
{
To minimize the wear on moving parts that do not get !
lubricated when the engine is not running, these SRs have been modified by Notes (the Note for SR 3.8.1.7 and Note 2 s
for SR 3.8.1.2) to indicate that all DG starts for these i Surveillance may be preceded by an engine prelube period and followed by a warmup period prior to loading. l For the purposes of this testing, the DGs are started from standby conditions. Standby conditions mean that the lube ,
oil is heated by the jacket water and continuously I circulated through a portion of the system as recommended by the vendor. Engine jacket water is heated by an immersion heater and circulates through the system by natural circulation. This allowance is not intended to impose a maximum limit on engine temperatures. For the purposes of j these SRs, the DG may be started using a manual start j signal, a simulated loss of offsite power test signal by j itself, a simulated loss of offsite power test signzl in j conjunction with an ECCS actuation test signal, or an ECCS l actuation test signal by itself. '
In order to reduce stress and wear on diesel engines, the manufacturer recommends that the starting speed of DGs be ( !
limited, that warmup be limited to this lower speed, and )
that DGs be gradually accelerated to synchronous speed prior to loading. These start procedures are the intent of Note 3, which i o ly applicable when such procedures are used. g ,p -
SR 3.8.1.7 requires that, at a 184 day Frequency, the DG starts from standby conditions and achieves reouired voltage and frequency within 12 seconds. /Be DG's ability to (maintain the required voltage and freqJency is tested by Qhose SRs which require DG loading.f The 12 second start requirement supports Ine assumptions in the design basis LOCA analysis (Ref. 5). The 12 second start requirement may not be applicable to SR 3.8.1.2 when a modified start procedure sa(see Note above described 3 of SR 3.8.1.2),
is used.
If a modified start is not used, the 12 second start requirement of SR 3.8.1.7 applies. Since SR 3.8.1.7 does raquire a 12 second start, it is more restrictive than SR 3.8.1.2, and it may be performed in lieu of SR 3.8.1.2.
This is the intent of Note 1 of SR 3.8.1.2. Similarly, the performance of SR 3.8.1.12 or SR 3.8.1.19 also satisfies the requirements of SR 3.8.1.2 and SR 3.8.1.7.
N* "
(continued)
.k%.
i CLINTON B 3.8-14 Revision No. 3-1 w wann
t INSERT 1 In addition to the SR requirements, the time for the DG to reach steidy state operation, unless the modified DG start method is employed, is periodically monitored and the trend evaluated to identify degradation of governor and voltage regulator perfonnance.
I t
_ _ _ _ _ - _ -- - - --------- - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~
I ~
j -
AC Sources-Operating l B 3.8.1 i ,8ASES,
{ j SURVEILLANCE SR 3.8.1.11 (continued)
REQUIREMENTS J is that performing the Surveillance.would remove a required )'
offsite circuit from service, perturb the electrical distribution system, and challenge plant safety systems.
' Credit may be taken for unplanned events that satisfy this SR.- Examples of unplanned events may include:
- 1) Unexpected operational events which.cause the equipment to perform the function specified by this l Surveillance, for which adequate documentation of the required performance is available; and
- 2) Post maintenance testing that requires performance of this Surveillance in order to restore the component to l OPERABLE, provided the maintenance was required, or performed in conjunction with maintenance required to maintain OPERABILITY or reliability.
SR 3.8.1.12 This Surveillance demonstrates that the DG automatically i starts and achieves the required voltage and frequency within the specified time (12 seconds) from the design basis (-
actuation signal (LOCA signal) and operates for a 5 minutes.
The 5 minute aeriod provides sufficient time to demonstrate stability. / Tie 's ability o mainta tne requ yed hage and freque is teste by those Rswhichgequir D loadin h -
The Frequency of 18 months takes into consideration plant conditions required to perform the Surveillance and is intended to be consistent with the expected fuel cycle lengt!:s. Operating experience has shown that these components usually pass the SR when performed at the 18 month Frequency. Therefore, the Frequency was concluded l to be acceptable-from a reliability standpoint.
This SR is modified by two Notes. The reason for Note 1 is to minimize weer and tear on the DGs during testing. For the purpose of this testing, the DGs must be started from standby conditions. Standby conditions mean that the lube oil is heated by the jacket water and continuously circulated through c portion of the system as recommended by the vendor. Engine jacket water is heated by an immersion heater and circulates through the system by natural circulation. This allowance is not intended to impose a (continued)
(
CLINTON B 3.8-22 Revision No. 3-1 L - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ - - - _
AC Sources-Operating 1
, B 3.8.1 BASES t
SURVEILLANCE SR 3.8.1.14 (continued) i REQUIREMENTS This Surveillance is modified by two Notes. Note I states that momentary transients due to changing bus loads do not l invalidate this test. Similarly, momentary power factor transients above the limit do not invalidate the test. The )
reason for Note 2 is that during operation with the ~ reactor 1 critical, performance of this SR could cause perturbations {
to the electrical distribution systems that would challenge continued steady state operation and, as a result, plant safety systems. Credit may be taken for unplanned events that satisfy this SR. Examples of unplanned events may i include:
- 1) Unexpected operational events which cause the equipment to perform the function specified by this Surveillance, for which adequate documentation of the required performance is wailable; and
- 2) Post maintenance testing that requires performance of this Surveillance in order to restore the component to OPERABLE, provided the maintenance was required, or 1 performed in conjunction with maintenance required to maintain OPERABILITY or reliability.
SR 3.8.1.15 *
' This Surveillance demonstrates that the diesel engine can restart from a hot condition, such as subsequent to shutdown from normal Surveillance, and achieve the re.1uired voltage and frequency within 12 seconds. The 12 second time is derived from the requirements of the accident analysis' to respond to a desian basis large break LOCAJThe(DG's \ ]
Aility tAmaintain\the regtr(red voltage a fregogncy 4 )
(tested by those SRs hhich reakire DG b adin The 18 month Frequency is consistent with the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 1.108 (Ref. 9),
paragraph 2.a.(5).
This SR has been modified by two Notes. Note 1 ensures that the test is performed with the diesel sufficiently hot. The requirement that the diesel has operated for at least I hour at full load conditions prior to perfonaance of this (continued)
CLINTON 8 3.8-25 Revision No. 3-1 i
' AC Sources-Operating 8 3.8.1
, BASES,
(
SURVEILLANCE SR 3.8.1.19 (continued)
REQUIREMENTS The Frequency of 18 months taes into consideration plant conditions required to perform the Surveillance and is intended to be consistent with an expected fuel cycle length of 18 months.
This SR is modified by two Notes. . The reason for Note 1 is to minimize wear and tear on the DGs during testing. For the purpose of this testing, the DGs must be started from standby conditions. Standby conditions mean that the lube oil is heated by the jacket water and continuously circulatt.J through a portion of the system as reconnenued by the vendor. Engine jacket water is heated by an immersion heater and circulates through the system by natural circulation. This allowance is not intended to impose a maximum limit on engine temperatures. The reason for Note ?
is that performing the Surveillance would remove a required offsite circuit from service, perturb the electrical distribution system, and challenge plant safety systems.
Credit may be taken for unplanned events that satisfy this SR. Examples of unplanned events may include:
- 1) Unexpected operational events which cause the b equipment to perform the function specified by this Surveillance, for which adequate documentation of the required performance is available; and
- 2) Post maintenance testing that requires performance of this Surveillance in order to restore the component to OPERABLE, provided the maintenance was required, or performed in conjunction with maintenance required to maintain OPERABILITY or reliability.
SR 3.8.1.20 This Surveillance is performed with the plant shut down and demonstrates that the DG starting independence has not been compromised. Also, this Surveillance demonstrates that each engine can achieve proper speed within the specified time when the DGs are started simultaneous 1vdThe DG's\abilit 7 maintainy.ne requited voltag( and frebency is tNsted b ]
th e SRs whhh requir\0G loadihgy i
i The 10 year Frequency is consistent with the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 1.108 (kef. 9).
(continued)
(
CLINTON 8 3.8-30 l
Revision No. 3-1 1
f l
L__ __-_____________ -