|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20199H2771999-01-20020 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Table 3.3.8.1-1 to Revise Allowable Values for Degraded Voltage Relay Reset & Dropout Setpoints as Specified Per Items 1.c,1.d,2.c & 2.d ML20196A0941998-11-20020 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Div 3 Diesel Generator Droop Issue ML20196A1501998-11-20020 November 1998 Revised Pages Constituting Rev 3 to CPS TS Bases,Consisting of Pages Annotated with Rev Numbers 3-1,3-2,3-3,3-4 & 3-5. Changes to Text Identified with Rev Bars.No Rev Bars Included for Changes to Format ML20155A5631998-10-23023 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs LCO 3.6.1.9, FW LCS (FWLCS) for Implementation of FWLCS Mode of RHR Sys U-603088, Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.5.13,allowing Next Scheduled Performance of LLRT of Primary Containment Penetration for RPV Head Spray Piping (IMC-042) to Be Deferred Until Seventh Refueling Outage (RF-7)1998-10-0505 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.5.13,allowing Next Scheduled Performance of LLRT of Primary Containment Penetration for RPV Head Spray Piping (IMC-042) to Be Deferred Until Seventh Refueling Outage (RF-7) ML20153F4201998-09-23023 September 1998 Corrected Proposed Tech Specs Bases Page B 3.8-94 Re SVC Protection Sys ML20237E4191998-08-24024 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs SR 3.8.1.17,revising Acceptance Criteria for Meeting ready-to-load Requirement for Division 3 DG ML20237C3501998-08-17017 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Partially Reducing Load at Which DGs Are Required to Be Tested Per Affected SRs in Order to Reduce Stress & Wear on Machines While Still Sufficiently Challenging Machines to Confirm Operability ML20236X0071998-07-31031 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Acceptance Criteria of SRs 3.8.1.7,3.8.1.12,3.8.1.15 & 3.8.1.20 ML20216B1511998-05-0404 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Incorporating Requirements for Static Var Compensator (SVC) Protection Sys Under New TS ML20217M3351998-04-27027 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Mgt Changes Occurring in Operations Organization at Plant ML20212C6951997-10-23023 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Constituting Rev 2 to CPS TS Bases.Rev Consists of Pages Annotated W/Rev Numbers 2-1 Through 2-14 ML20149J1701997-07-22022 July 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Requesting Exemption to 10CFR50,App a, General Design Criteria to Allow Operation W/Identified Offsite Circuit Condition U-602714, Proposed Tech Specs Table 3.3.8.1-1 Re Loss of Power Instrumentation1997-04-0101 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Table 3.3.8.1-1 Re Loss of Power Instrumentation ML20133F2051997-01-0707 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 2.0 Re Safety Limits ML20133A5951996-12-13013 December 1996 Proposed TSs Re Transfer of Minority Ownership ML20134M3181996-11-19019 November 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Table 3.3.8.1-1, Loss of Power Instrumentation, by Dividing Function, Degraded Voltage - 4.16 Kv Basis & Degraded Voltage Dropout - 4.16 Kv Basis, re-numbering Items in Table & Revising Associated Notes ML20128K0711996-10-0404 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.3.8.1,adding Action Statement & Note Requiring Restoration of Inoperable Degraded Voltage Relays, Rev to Table 3.3.8.1-1 ML20134C1631996-09-20020 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS 3.3.4.1, End of Cycle Recirculation Pump Trip Instrumentation, to Delete SR 3.3.4.1.6 Which Requires RPT Breaker Interruption Time to Be Determined at Least Once Per 60 Months U-602623, Proposed Tech Specs 3.10.10, Single Control Rod Withdrawal- Refueling1996-08-15015 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.10.10, Single Control Rod Withdrawal- Refueling ML20116N1101996-08-15015 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 2.0, Safety Limits, Changing TS to Incorporate Revised SLMCPR as Calculated by GE for CPS Cycle 7 U-602619, Proposed Tech Specs 5.0, Administrative Controls, Deleting Examples Currently Included in Parentheses1996-08-15015 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 5.0, Administrative Controls, Deleting Examples Currently Included in Parentheses ML20113E7261996-06-28028 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Removal of Inclined Fuel Transfer Sys Primary Containment Blind Flange While Primary Containment Required to Be Operable U-602591, Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Utilization of RWP or Equivalent to Control Entry Into High Radiation Area, Clarifying Example Given in TS of Individuals Qualified in Radiation Protection Procedures1996-06-21021 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Utilization of RWP or Equivalent to Control Entry Into High Radiation Area, Clarifying Example Given in TS of Individuals Qualified in Radiation Protection Procedures ML20108C9431996-05-0101 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Implementing 10CFR50,App J - Option B ML20107L0011996-04-19019 April 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Listed TS to Eliminate Core Alterations as Applicable Condition for Which Associated LCO Must Be Met ML20100H7741996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Proposing to Revise TS 3.6.5.1, Drywell, to Allow Drywell Bypass Leakage Tests to Be Performed at Intervals of Up to Ten Yrs Based on Demonstrated Performance of Drywell Barrier ML20100H7901996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting SR 3.3.8.1.1 Which Requires Channel Check for Loss of Power Instrumentation & Changing TS Table 3.3.8.1-1 to Change Allowable Value for Degraded Voltage Function from 3762V & 3832V to 3876V ML20100H8171996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing TS 3.4.11, RCS P/T Limits, to Incorporate Specific P/T Limits for Bottom Head Region of Rv Separate & Apart from Core Beltline Region of Rv ML20100H8411996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing TS 3.3.4.1, End of Cycle Recirculation Pump Trip Instrumentation, to Delete SR 3.3.4.1.6 Which Requires RPT Breaker Interruption Time to Be Determined at Least Once Per 60 Months ML20095G4791995-12-14014 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.2, Flow Control Valves Re Proposed Deletion of Average Rate of Movement Verification Requirement ML20095G5141995-12-14014 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs 3.3.1.1, RPS Instrumentation & TS 3.3.6.1, Primary Containment Dwl Isolation Instrumentation to Eliminate Periodic Response Time Testing of Analog Trip Modules ML20095G6401995-12-14014 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Instrumentation Associated W/High Pressure Core Spray Sys,Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Sys & Residual Heat Removal Sys ML20094D2141995-10-27027 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Changes to TS 5.2.2.e to Revise Requirements for Controls on Working Hs of Unit Staff That Perform SR Functions ML20094D2031995-10-27027 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Consiting of Changes to TS 3.1.3 to Include 25% Surveillance Overrun Allowed by LCO 3.0.2 Into Allowances of Surveillance Notes for Control Rod Notch Testing Per SR 3.1.3.2 & SR 3.1.3.3 ML20085N0621995-06-23023 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Bases,Per TS 5.5.11, TS Bases Control Program ML20085F5961995-06-0909 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Description of Exclusion Area Boundary ML20085J9701995-02-16016 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Enforcement Discretion Re TS LCO for Div 2 DC Electrical Power Sources ML20078Q2931995-02-14014 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs 3.8.2, AC Sources-Shutdown, 3.8.5, DC Sources-Shutdown & 3.8.8, Inverters-Shutdown ML20078N2701995-02-10010 February 1995 Proposed TS 3.3.2.1, Control Rod Block Instrumentation ML20078E9701995-01-27027 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Eliminating Selected Response Time Testing Requirements U-602372, Proposed Tech Specs Requesting Complete Rev of CPS TS for Conversion to Improved TS Per Guidance Provided by NUREG-1434, Improved BWR-6 TS, Rev 0,dated Sept 19921994-11-18018 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Requesting Complete Rev of CPS TS for Conversion to Improved TS Per Guidance Provided by NUREG-1434, Improved BWR-6 TS, Rev 0,dated Sept 1992 ML20076G2721994-10-14014 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Drywell Bypass Leakage Test to Be Performed at five-yr Interval ML20072E6701994-08-12012 August 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Eliminating Requirement to Perform Manual Testing of solid-state Logic Independently from self-test Sys ML20072E6191994-08-12012 August 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Allowing Drywell Bypass Leakage Rate Tests to Be Performed at Intervals as Long as Ten Years ML20072C1251994-08-0505 August 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Requirement for Accelerated Testing of Div 1 DG ML20069Q3851994-06-27027 June 1994 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.4.3.1, Reactor Coolant Sys Leakage- Leakage Detection Sys ML20069N3201994-06-16016 June 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Adding -89 After ASTM D3803 in Testing Requirements Specified for SGTS & MCR Filter Sys Charcoal & Changing Test Temp for Testing SGTS Charcoal from 80 C to 30 C ML20069K8191994-06-13013 June 1994 Proposed Tech Specs to Allow 36-inch Isolation Valve Leak Measurement Be Performed at Least Once Per 18 Months, Providing Valves Remain Closed During Period ML20070N6951994-04-26026 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Adopting Changes Recommended in NRC Re NUREG-1434 1999-01-20
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20209E0551999-07-0606 July 1999 1999 Business Plan ML20206F2231999-04-27027 April 1999 NRC Manual Chapter 0350 Restart Action Plan for Clinton Power Station ML20199H2771999-01-20020 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Table 3.3.8.1-1 to Revise Allowable Values for Degraded Voltage Relay Reset & Dropout Setpoints as Specified Per Items 1.c,1.d,2.c & 2.d ML20206E6281998-12-31031 December 1998 Rev 17 to ODCM for Clinton Power Station ML20196A0941998-11-20020 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Div 3 Diesel Generator Droop Issue ML20196A1501998-11-20020 November 1998 Revised Pages Constituting Rev 3 to CPS TS Bases,Consisting of Pages Annotated with Rev Numbers 3-1,3-2,3-3,3-4 & 3-5. Changes to Text Identified with Rev Bars.No Rev Bars Included for Changes to Format ML20155A5631998-10-23023 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs LCO 3.6.1.9, FW LCS (FWLCS) for Implementation of FWLCS Mode of RHR Sys U-603088, Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.5.13,allowing Next Scheduled Performance of LLRT of Primary Containment Penetration for RPV Head Spray Piping (IMC-042) to Be Deferred Until Seventh Refueling Outage (RF-7)1998-10-0505 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.5.13,allowing Next Scheduled Performance of LLRT of Primary Containment Penetration for RPV Head Spray Piping (IMC-042) to Be Deferred Until Seventh Refueling Outage (RF-7) ML20153F4201998-09-23023 September 1998 Corrected Proposed Tech Specs Bases Page B 3.8-94 Re SVC Protection Sys ML20237E4191998-08-24024 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs SR 3.8.1.17,revising Acceptance Criteria for Meeting ready-to-load Requirement for Division 3 DG ML20237C3501998-08-17017 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Partially Reducing Load at Which DGs Are Required to Be Tested Per Affected SRs in Order to Reduce Stress & Wear on Machines While Still Sufficiently Challenging Machines to Confirm Operability ML20236X0071998-07-31031 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Acceptance Criteria of SRs 3.8.1.7,3.8.1.12,3.8.1.15 & 3.8.1.20 ML20236Q4661998-07-17017 July 1998 Rev 0 to Procedure 2800.93, Emergency Reserve Auxiliary Transformer Integrated Test ML20236Q4651998-07-17017 July 1998 Rev 0 to Procedure 2800.92, Emergency Reserve Auxiliary Transformer Integrated Test ML20236Q4571998-07-17017 July 1998 Rev 0 to Procedure 2800.91, Emergency Reserve Auxiliary Transformer Test ML20216B1511998-05-0404 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Incorporating Requirements for Static Var Compensator (SVC) Protection Sys Under New TS ML20217M3351998-04-27027 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Mgt Changes Occurring in Operations Organization at Plant ML20203D5651998-02-19019 February 1998 Plan for Excellence ML20212C6951997-10-23023 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Constituting Rev 2 to CPS TS Bases.Rev Consists of Pages Annotated W/Rev Numbers 2-1 Through 2-14 ML20149J1701997-07-22022 July 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Requesting Exemption to 10CFR50,App a, General Design Criteria to Allow Operation W/Identified Offsite Circuit Condition ML20149H8991997-06-30030 June 1997 CPS Long Term Improvement Plan U-602714, Proposed Tech Specs Table 3.3.8.1-1 Re Loss of Power Instrumentation1997-04-0101 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Table 3.3.8.1-1 Re Loss of Power Instrumentation ML20133F2051997-01-0707 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 2.0 Re Safety Limits ML20133A5951996-12-13013 December 1996 Proposed TSs Re Transfer of Minority Ownership ML20134M3181996-11-19019 November 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Table 3.3.8.1-1, Loss of Power Instrumentation, by Dividing Function, Degraded Voltage - 4.16 Kv Basis & Degraded Voltage Dropout - 4.16 Kv Basis, re-numbering Items in Table & Revising Associated Notes ML20128K0711996-10-0404 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.3.8.1,adding Action Statement & Note Requiring Restoration of Inoperable Degraded Voltage Relays, Rev to Table 3.3.8.1-1 ML20134C1631996-09-20020 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS 3.3.4.1, End of Cycle Recirculation Pump Trip Instrumentation, to Delete SR 3.3.4.1.6 Which Requires RPT Breaker Interruption Time to Be Determined at Least Once Per 60 Months ML20116N1101996-08-15015 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 2.0, Safety Limits, Changing TS to Incorporate Revised SLMCPR as Calculated by GE for CPS Cycle 7 U-602619, Proposed Tech Specs 5.0, Administrative Controls, Deleting Examples Currently Included in Parentheses1996-08-15015 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 5.0, Administrative Controls, Deleting Examples Currently Included in Parentheses U-602623, Proposed Tech Specs 3.10.10, Single Control Rod Withdrawal- Refueling1996-08-15015 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.10.10, Single Control Rod Withdrawal- Refueling ML20137A1101996-08-14014 August 1996 Rev 19 to App V Second 10-Yr Interval Pump & Valve Testing Program Plan ML20137A1021996-07-10010 July 1996 Rev 5 to App IV Second 10-Yr Interval Inservice Exam Plan ML20113E7261996-06-28028 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Removal of Inclined Fuel Transfer Sys Primary Containment Blind Flange While Primary Containment Required to Be Operable U-602591, Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Utilization of RWP or Equivalent to Control Entry Into High Radiation Area, Clarifying Example Given in TS of Individuals Qualified in Radiation Protection Procedures1996-06-21021 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Utilization of RWP or Equivalent to Control Entry Into High Radiation Area, Clarifying Example Given in TS of Individuals Qualified in Radiation Protection Procedures ML20108C9431996-05-0101 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Implementing 10CFR50,App J - Option B ML20107L0011996-04-19019 April 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Listed TS to Eliminate Core Alterations as Applicable Condition for Which Associated LCO Must Be Met ML20100H8411996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing TS 3.3.4.1, End of Cycle Recirculation Pump Trip Instrumentation, to Delete SR 3.3.4.1.6 Which Requires RPT Breaker Interruption Time to Be Determined at Least Once Per 60 Months ML20100H7901996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting SR 3.3.8.1.1 Which Requires Channel Check for Loss of Power Instrumentation & Changing TS Table 3.3.8.1-1 to Change Allowable Value for Degraded Voltage Function from 3762V & 3832V to 3876V ML20100H8171996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing TS 3.4.11, RCS P/T Limits, to Incorporate Specific P/T Limits for Bottom Head Region of Rv Separate & Apart from Core Beltline Region of Rv ML20100H7741996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Proposing to Revise TS 3.6.5.1, Drywell, to Allow Drywell Bypass Leakage Tests to Be Performed at Intervals of Up to Ten Yrs Based on Demonstrated Performance of Drywell Barrier ML20095G5141995-12-14014 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs 3.3.1.1, RPS Instrumentation & TS 3.3.6.1, Primary Containment Dwl Isolation Instrumentation to Eliminate Periodic Response Time Testing of Analog Trip Modules ML20095G6401995-12-14014 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Instrumentation Associated W/High Pressure Core Spray Sys,Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Sys & Residual Heat Removal Sys ML20095G4791995-12-14014 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.2, Flow Control Valves Re Proposed Deletion of Average Rate of Movement Verification Requirement ML20117E3001995-11-0606 November 1995 Rev 18 to App V Pump & Valve Testing Program Plan ML20094D2031995-10-27027 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Consiting of Changes to TS 3.1.3 to Include 25% Surveillance Overrun Allowed by LCO 3.0.2 Into Allowances of Surveillance Notes for Control Rod Notch Testing Per SR 3.1.3.2 & SR 3.1.3.3 ML20094D2141995-10-27027 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Changes to TS 5.2.2.e to Revise Requirements for Controls on Working Hs of Unit Staff That Perform SR Functions ML20085N0621995-06-23023 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Bases,Per TS 5.5.11, TS Bases Control Program ML20085F5961995-06-0909 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Description of Exclusion Area Boundary ML20087J5691995-05-17017 May 1995 Rev 17 to App V, Pump & Valve Testing Program Plan of CPS ISI Program Manual ML20085J9701995-02-16016 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Enforcement Discretion Re TS LCO for Div 2 DC Electrical Power Sources 1999-07-06
[Table view] |
Text
s 1 l
4 . Attachment 3 to U-602520 LS-95-007 Page1of5 i
- Attached Marked-Up 1
Pages of the Technical Specifications 1
1 l
l l
l l
i l
t i
9512210075 951214 4 PDR ADOCK 05000461 P pm
.m . _ . _ ._ -_ _ - , _ . . . . . . ., _ ___ _. _ - . - - _ . - - - _ -
l . ,
Attachment 3 to U-602520 LS-95-007 f ,
Page 2 of 5 i .
RPS. Instrumentation 3.3.1.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)
SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.3.1.1.16 Verify Turbine Stop Valve Closure and 18 months Turbine Control Valve Fast Closure Trip 011 Pressure-Low Functions are not bypassed when THERMAL POWER is 2 40% RTP.
l SR 3.3.1.1.17 ------------------NOTES------------------
- 1. Neutron detectors are exc1'uded.
- 2. For Functions 3, 4, and 5 in Table j i
f}And analbh{} 3.3.1.1-1, the channel sensor are Liv 4p rnedules excluded.
2_
- 3. The STAGGERED TEST BASIS Frequency for each Function shall be determined j on a per channel basis.
Verify the RPS RESPONSE TIME is within 18 months on a limits. STAGGERED TEST BASIS 1
CLINTON 3.3-6 Amendment No. AE,98' l
- - ~~~ ~- - ~ ' ~ ~ ~ '
' Attachment $"tio U 4@2520~' ' ,
' LS-95-007 l
/do t b nges. 7 (ov.Ye[ Page 3 of 5 Q>< conHo v @ M ly .
, RPS Instrumentation 3.3.1.1 Table 3.3.1.1 1 (page 2 of 3)
Reactor Protection System Instrumentation APPLICABLE CONo!TIONS MODES OR REQUIRED REFERENCED OTHER CHANNELS FROM SPECIFIED PER REQUIRED SURVEILLANCE ALLOWASLE FUNCTION CON 0!TIONS FUNCT10N ACTION 0.1 REQUIREMENTS VALUE
- 3. Reactor vesset steam Dome 1,2 4 N st 3.3.1.1.1 s 1080 pelg Pressure - Nigh SR 3.3.1.1.9 SR 3.3.1.1.10 SR 3.3.1.1.13 SR 3.3.1.1.15 st 3.3.1.1.17
- 4. Reactor Vessel Water . 1,2 4 H SR 3.3.1.1.1
- 8.3 Inches Level-Low, Level 3 st 3.3.1.1.9 st 3.3.1.1.10 st 3.3.1.1.13 st 3.3.1.1.15 st 3.3.1.1.17
- 5. Reactor vessel Water a 25 % RTP 4 F st 3.3.1.1.1 s 52.6 Inches Level-Nigh, Levet 8 SR 3.3.1.1.9 st 3.3.1.1.10 st 3.3.1.1.13 st 3.3.1.1.15 st 3.3.1.1.17
- 6. Main steam Isolation 1 4 G st 3.3.1.1.9 s 12% closed Valve - Closure SR 3.3.1.1.13 st 3.3.1.1.15 st 3.3.1.1.17
- 7. Crywell Pressure-Migh 1,2 4 H SR 3.3.1.1.1 s 1.88 pois sR 3.3.1.1.9 SR 3.3.1.1.10 SR 3.3.1.1.13 SR 3.3.1.1.15
- 8. scram Olscharge Volune Water Levet -High
- e. Transmitter 1,2 4 N SR 3.3.1.1.1 s 40 1/4 inches SR 3.3.1.1.9 for 1C11-SR 3.3.1.1.10 N601A,B and SR 3.3.1.1.13 s 39 3/16 SR 3.3.1.1.15 inches for 1C11 N601C,0 5(a) 4 I st 3.3.1.1.1 s 40 1/4 inches SR 3.3.1.1.9 for 1C11-SR 3.3.1.1.10 N601A,s and st 3.3.1.1.13 5 39 3/16 st 3.3.1.1.15 inches for 1C11 N601C,0 (continued)
(a) With any control rod withdrawn from a core cell containing one or more fuel asseebtles.
CLINTON 3.3-8 Amendment No. 95
ageactuments N ^ ~-
LS-95-007 Page 4 of 5 Primary Containment and Drywell Isolation Instrumentation 3.3.6.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS
NOTES------------------------------------
.1. Refer to Table 3.3.6.1-1 to determine which SRs apply for each Primary Containment and Drywell Isolation Function.
- 2. Wh'en a channel is placed in an inoperable status solely for performance of required Surveillances, entry into associated Conditions and Required Actions may be delayed for up to 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />, provided the associated Function maintains isolation capability.
SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.3.6.1.1 Perform CHANNEL CHECK. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> SR 3.3.6.1.2 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. 92 days SR 3.3.6.1.3 Calibrate the analog trip module. 92 days SR 3.3.6.1.4 Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION. 92 days SR 3.3.6.1.5 Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION. 18 months SR 3.3.6.1.6 Perform LOGIC SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL TEST. 18 months SR 3.3.6.1.7 ------------------NOTES------------------
- 1. Channel sensoryare excluded, d *S 2. The STAGGERED TEST BASIS Frequency LM P rnebles for each Function shall be determined on a per channel basis.
Verify the ISOLATION SYSTEM RESPONSE TIME 18 months on a for the main steam isolation valves is STAGGERED TEST within limits. BASIS CLINTON 3.3-54 Amendment No. Ah g
Attachment 3 to U-602520 LS-95-007 No Chd & PN'N* #8" $ $
& nv.h only. Pricary Containment and Drywell Isolation Instrumentation 3.3.6.1 Table 3.3.6.1 1 (page 1 of 7)
Prleary Contalment and OrWett Iso 1etion instrunentatIon APPLICARLE CONO1)10NS MODES OR REQUIRED REFERENCE 0 ,
OTHER CHANNELS FROM SPECIFIED PER REQUIRED SURVEILLANCE ALLOWABLE FUNCTION CON 0lfl0Ns FUNCTION ACTION F.1 REQUIREMENTS VALUE
- 1. Main steam Line Isolation
- a. Reactor vessel Water 1,2,3 4 G SR 3.3.6.1.1 t 147.7 inches Level -Low Low Low, sR 3.3.6.1.2 Levet 1 $R 3.3.6.1.3 SR 3.3.6.1.5 SR 3.3.6.1.6 SR 3.3.6.1.7
- b. Main steam Line 1 4 H SR 3.3.6.1.1 k 837 psig Pressure - Low st 3.3.6.1.2 SR 3.3.6.1.3 sR 3.3.6.1.5 SR 3.3.6.1.6 SR 3.3.6.1.7
- c. Main steam Line 1,2,3 4 G sa 3.3.6.1.1 s 178 psid F tou - NIgh sa 3.3.6.1.2 st 3.3.6.1.3 st 3.3.6.1.5 SR 3.3.6.1.6 SR 3.3.6.1.7
- d. Condenser Vacuus-Low 1,2(a) , 4 G SR 3.3.6.1.1 t 7.6 inches SR 3.3.6.1.2 Ng vacuun 3(*) SR 3.3.6.1.3 SR 3.3.6.1.5 SR 3.3.6.1.6
- e. Main steam Tumet 1,2,3 4 G SR 3.3.6.1.1 5 171'T Towperature - Nish SR 3.3.6.1.2 SR 3.3.6.1.5 SR 3.3.6.1.6
- f. Main steam Line Turbine 1,2,3 4 G st 3.3.6.1.1 Modules 1 4 sullding SR 3.3.6.1.2 s 142'F, Temperature - Nigh SR 3.3.6.1.5 Modute 5 SR 3.3.6.1.6 s 150*F
- g. Manual Initiation 1,2,3 s 4 J SR 3.3.6.1.6 NA (continued)
(a) With any turbine stop valve not closed.
CLINTON 3.3-55 Amendment No. 95
Attachment 4 to U-602520 LS-95-007 Page1of5 Technical Specification Bases Changes l
^
- [@$*I!1sNumentation B 3.3.1.1 BASES SURVEILLANCE SR 3.3,1.1.16 REQUIREMENTS This SR ensures that scrams initiated from the Turbine Stop (continued) Valve Closure and Turbine Control Valve Fast Closure, Trip 011 Pressure-Low Functions will not be inadvertently i bypassed when THERMAL POWER is t 40% RTP. This involves I
calibration of the bypass channels. Adequate margins for i I
the instrument setpoint methodology are incorporated into I the actual setpoint.
If any bypass channel setpoint is nonconservative such that the Functions are bypassed at a 40% RTP (e.g., due to open l main steam line drain (s), main turbine bypass valve (s) or other reasons), then the affected Turbine Stop Valve closure and Turbine Control Valve Fast Closure, Trip Oil Pressure-Low Functions are con'sidered inoperable.
Alternatively, the bypass channel can be placed in the conservative condition (nonbypass). If placed in the nonbypass condition, this SR is met and the channel is considered OPERABLE.
The Frequency of 18. months is based on engineering judgment and reliability of the components.
SR 3.3.1.1.17 This SR ensures that the individual channel response times are less than or equal to the maximum values assumed in the accident analysis. The RPS RESPONSE TIME acceptance criteria are included in plant Surveillance procedures.
As noted, neutron detectors are excluded from RPS RESPONSE TlHE testing because the principles of detector operation virtually ensure an instantaneous response time. In MO addition, for Functions 3, 4, and 5, the associated sensors ll w p w M .$c4 re not required to be response time tested. For these Functions, r ng for the remaining channel componen , ir.cluding the ^"s v is required. This allowance ll is suppor e e cu 10.
RPS RESPONSE TIME tests are conducted on an 18 month STAGGERED TEST BASIS. Note 3 of SR 3.3.1.1.17 requires STAGGERED TEST BASIS Frequency for each Function to be (continued)
CLINTON B 3.3-29 Revision No. /
- - -- - - . . _ _ , ~~
-, _ _ Attachment 4 to U'-6dE520' ^
NO Chond*S 7##### I*'e"5oIs OrCoy)MOVh CG .
RPS Instrumentation B 3.3.1.1 f
BASES SURVEILLANCE SR 3.3.1.1.17 (continued)
REQUIREMENTS determined separately based on the four channels as specified in Table 3.3.1.1-1. This Frequency is based on the logic interrelationships of the various channels required to produce an RPS scram signal. l Therefore, staggered testing results in response time i
. verification of these devices eve'ry 18 months. This !
Frequency 'is consistent With the typical industry refueling
' cycle and is based upon plant operating experience, which-shows that random failures of instrumentation components causing serious time degradation, but not channel failure, are infrequent. !
l REFERENCES 1. USAR, Section 7.2. ,
- 2. USAR, Section 5.2.2.
- 3. USAR, Section 6.3.3.
- 4. USAR, Chapter 15.
- 5. USAR, Section 15.4.1.2.
- 6. NED0-23842, " Continuous Control Rod Withdrawal in the
. Startup Range," April 18, 1978.
- 7. USAR, Section 15.4.9.
- 8. Letter, P. Check (NRC) to G. Lainas (NRC), "BWR Scram Discharge System Safety Evaluation," December 1,1980, as attached to NRC Generic Letter dated December 9, 1980.
- 9. NED0-30851-P-A, " Technical Specification Improvement Analyses for BWR Reactor Protection System,"
Harch 1988.
- 10. NED0-32291-A, " System Analyses for Elimination of Selected Response Time Testing Requirements," January 1994.
CLINTON B 3.3-30 Revision No. 1
LS-95-007 No c.hanges.7caddej b CorWiOV h PrimaryContainmentandDrywellIsolat$ofiks?fubentation !
8 3.3.6.1 On%.
l BASES SR 3.3.6.1.4 and SR 3.3.6.1,5 (continued)
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS responds to the measured parameter within the necessary range and accuracy. CHANNEL CAllBRATION leaves the channel adjusted to account for instrument drifts between successive calibrations consistent with the plant specific setpoint methodology.
The Frequency of SR 3.3.6.1.4 and SR 3.3.6.1.6 is based on the assumption of the magnitude of equipment drift in the setpoint analysis.
SR 3.3.6.1.6 The LOGIC SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL TEST demonstrates the OPERABILITY of the required isolation logic for a specific i channel. The system functional testing performed on PCIVs l l
in LC0 3.6.1.3 and on drywell isolation valves in LC0 l 3.6.5.3 overlaps this Surveillance to provide complete !
testing of the assumed safety function. The 18 month l i
Frequency is based on the need to perform this Surveillance under the conditions that apply during a plant outage and the potential for an unplanned transient if the Surveillance were performed with the reactor at power. Operating experience has shown these components usually pass the Surveillance when performed at the 18 month Frequency.
The Self Test Syrtem may be utilized to perform this testing for those components that it is designed to monitor. Those
! portions of the solid-state logic not monitored by the Self' Test System may be tested at the frequency recommended by l the manufacturer, rather than at the specified 18-month l
Frequency. The frequencies recommended by the manufacturer are based on mean time between failure analysis for the components in the associated circuits.
SR 3.3.6.1.7 This SR ensures that the individual channel response times are less than or equal to the maximum values assumed in the accident analysis. Testing is performed only on channels l where the assumed response time does not correspond to the l
I diesel generator (DG) start time. For channels assumed to respond within the DG start time, sufficient margin exists I in the 12 second start time when compared to the typical channel response time (milliseconds) so as to assure adequate response without a specific measurement test. The (continued)
CLINTON B 3.3-172 Revision No. 1-1 f
LS-95-007 Page 5 of 5 Primary Containment and Drywell Isolation Instrumentation B 3.3.6.1 BASES SURVEILLANCE SR 3.3.6.1.7 (continued) l REQUIREMENTS instrument response times'must be added to the MSIV closure ,
I times to obtain the ISOLATION SYSTEM RESPONSE TIME.
ISOLATION SYSTEM RESPONSE TIME acceptance criteria are included in applicable plant procedures, and aruloj As noted, the associated sensorsAare not required to be \l l Wip rreddes response time tested. Respon ti s the l remaining channel component ,--ir.c.ud.n- th AT."pi is 0 l required. This is supporte e erence 7-Note 2 to SR 3.3.6.1.7 requires the STAGGERED TEST BASIS Frequency for each Function to be determined seperately based on the number of channels as specified on Table 3.3.6.1-1. This Frequency is based on the logic interrelationships of the various channels required to produce an isolation signal, j ISOLATION SYSTEM RESPONSE TIME tests are conducted on an 18 month STAGGERED TEST BASIS. This Frequency is consistent .
with the typical industry refueling cycle and is based upon I plant operating experience that shows that random failures of instrumentation components causing serious response time degradation, but not channel failure, are infrequent.
REFERENCES 1. USAR, Section 6.2.
- 2. USAR, Chapter 15.
- 3. NED0-31466, " Technical Specification Screening Criteria Application and Risk Assessment,"
November 1987.
- 4. USAR, Section 9.3.5.
- 5. NEDC-31677-P-A, " Technical Specification Improvement Analysis for BWR Isolation Actuation Instrumentation,"
June 1989.
- 6. NEDC-30851-P-A, Supplement 2, " Technical Specifications Improvement Analysis for BWR Isolation Instrumentation Common to RPS and ECCS Instrumentation," Harch 1989.
(continued)
CLINTON B 3.3-173 RevisionNo./O
. _ _ - ..