|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20199H2771999-01-20020 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Table 3.3.8.1-1 to Revise Allowable Values for Degraded Voltage Relay Reset & Dropout Setpoints as Specified Per Items 1.c,1.d,2.c & 2.d ML20196A0941998-11-20020 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Div 3 Diesel Generator Droop Issue ML20196A1501998-11-20020 November 1998 Revised Pages Constituting Rev 3 to CPS TS Bases,Consisting of Pages Annotated with Rev Numbers 3-1,3-2,3-3,3-4 & 3-5. Changes to Text Identified with Rev Bars.No Rev Bars Included for Changes to Format ML20155A5631998-10-23023 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs LCO 3.6.1.9, FW LCS (FWLCS) for Implementation of FWLCS Mode of RHR Sys U-603088, Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.5.13,allowing Next Scheduled Performance of LLRT of Primary Containment Penetration for RPV Head Spray Piping (IMC-042) to Be Deferred Until Seventh Refueling Outage (RF-7)1998-10-0505 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.5.13,allowing Next Scheduled Performance of LLRT of Primary Containment Penetration for RPV Head Spray Piping (IMC-042) to Be Deferred Until Seventh Refueling Outage (RF-7) ML20153F4201998-09-23023 September 1998 Corrected Proposed Tech Specs Bases Page B 3.8-94 Re SVC Protection Sys ML20237E4191998-08-24024 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs SR 3.8.1.17,revising Acceptance Criteria for Meeting ready-to-load Requirement for Division 3 DG ML20237C3501998-08-17017 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Partially Reducing Load at Which DGs Are Required to Be Tested Per Affected SRs in Order to Reduce Stress & Wear on Machines While Still Sufficiently Challenging Machines to Confirm Operability ML20236X0071998-07-31031 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Acceptance Criteria of SRs 3.8.1.7,3.8.1.12,3.8.1.15 & 3.8.1.20 ML20216B1511998-05-0404 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Incorporating Requirements for Static Var Compensator (SVC) Protection Sys Under New TS ML20217M3351998-04-27027 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Mgt Changes Occurring in Operations Organization at Plant ML20212C6951997-10-23023 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Constituting Rev 2 to CPS TS Bases.Rev Consists of Pages Annotated W/Rev Numbers 2-1 Through 2-14 ML20149J1701997-07-22022 July 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Requesting Exemption to 10CFR50,App a, General Design Criteria to Allow Operation W/Identified Offsite Circuit Condition U-602714, Proposed Tech Specs Table 3.3.8.1-1 Re Loss of Power Instrumentation1997-04-0101 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Table 3.3.8.1-1 Re Loss of Power Instrumentation ML20133F2051997-01-0707 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 2.0 Re Safety Limits ML20133A5951996-12-13013 December 1996 Proposed TSs Re Transfer of Minority Ownership ML20134M3181996-11-19019 November 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Table 3.3.8.1-1, Loss of Power Instrumentation, by Dividing Function, Degraded Voltage - 4.16 Kv Basis & Degraded Voltage Dropout - 4.16 Kv Basis, re-numbering Items in Table & Revising Associated Notes ML20128K0711996-10-0404 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.3.8.1,adding Action Statement & Note Requiring Restoration of Inoperable Degraded Voltage Relays, Rev to Table 3.3.8.1-1 ML20134C1631996-09-20020 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS 3.3.4.1, End of Cycle Recirculation Pump Trip Instrumentation, to Delete SR 3.3.4.1.6 Which Requires RPT Breaker Interruption Time to Be Determined at Least Once Per 60 Months U-602623, Proposed Tech Specs 3.10.10, Single Control Rod Withdrawal- Refueling1996-08-15015 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.10.10, Single Control Rod Withdrawal- Refueling ML20116N1101996-08-15015 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 2.0, Safety Limits, Changing TS to Incorporate Revised SLMCPR as Calculated by GE for CPS Cycle 7 U-602619, Proposed Tech Specs 5.0, Administrative Controls, Deleting Examples Currently Included in Parentheses1996-08-15015 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 5.0, Administrative Controls, Deleting Examples Currently Included in Parentheses ML20113E7261996-06-28028 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Removal of Inclined Fuel Transfer Sys Primary Containment Blind Flange While Primary Containment Required to Be Operable U-602591, Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Utilization of RWP or Equivalent to Control Entry Into High Radiation Area, Clarifying Example Given in TS of Individuals Qualified in Radiation Protection Procedures1996-06-21021 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Utilization of RWP or Equivalent to Control Entry Into High Radiation Area, Clarifying Example Given in TS of Individuals Qualified in Radiation Protection Procedures ML20108C9431996-05-0101 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Implementing 10CFR50,App J - Option B ML20107L0011996-04-19019 April 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Listed TS to Eliminate Core Alterations as Applicable Condition for Which Associated LCO Must Be Met ML20100H7741996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Proposing to Revise TS 3.6.5.1, Drywell, to Allow Drywell Bypass Leakage Tests to Be Performed at Intervals of Up to Ten Yrs Based on Demonstrated Performance of Drywell Barrier ML20100H7901996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting SR 3.3.8.1.1 Which Requires Channel Check for Loss of Power Instrumentation & Changing TS Table 3.3.8.1-1 to Change Allowable Value for Degraded Voltage Function from 3762V & 3832V to 3876V ML20100H8171996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing TS 3.4.11, RCS P/T Limits, to Incorporate Specific P/T Limits for Bottom Head Region of Rv Separate & Apart from Core Beltline Region of Rv ML20100H8411996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing TS 3.3.4.1, End of Cycle Recirculation Pump Trip Instrumentation, to Delete SR 3.3.4.1.6 Which Requires RPT Breaker Interruption Time to Be Determined at Least Once Per 60 Months ML20095G4791995-12-14014 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.2, Flow Control Valves Re Proposed Deletion of Average Rate of Movement Verification Requirement ML20095G5141995-12-14014 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs 3.3.1.1, RPS Instrumentation & TS 3.3.6.1, Primary Containment Dwl Isolation Instrumentation to Eliminate Periodic Response Time Testing of Analog Trip Modules ML20095G6401995-12-14014 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Instrumentation Associated W/High Pressure Core Spray Sys,Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Sys & Residual Heat Removal Sys ML20094D2141995-10-27027 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Changes to TS 5.2.2.e to Revise Requirements for Controls on Working Hs of Unit Staff That Perform SR Functions ML20094D2031995-10-27027 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Consiting of Changes to TS 3.1.3 to Include 25% Surveillance Overrun Allowed by LCO 3.0.2 Into Allowances of Surveillance Notes for Control Rod Notch Testing Per SR 3.1.3.2 & SR 3.1.3.3 ML20085N0621995-06-23023 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Bases,Per TS 5.5.11, TS Bases Control Program ML20085F5961995-06-0909 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Description of Exclusion Area Boundary ML20085J9701995-02-16016 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Enforcement Discretion Re TS LCO for Div 2 DC Electrical Power Sources ML20078Q2931995-02-14014 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs 3.8.2, AC Sources-Shutdown, 3.8.5, DC Sources-Shutdown & 3.8.8, Inverters-Shutdown ML20078N2701995-02-10010 February 1995 Proposed TS 3.3.2.1, Control Rod Block Instrumentation ML20078E9701995-01-27027 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Eliminating Selected Response Time Testing Requirements U-602372, Proposed Tech Specs Requesting Complete Rev of CPS TS for Conversion to Improved TS Per Guidance Provided by NUREG-1434, Improved BWR-6 TS, Rev 0,dated Sept 19921994-11-18018 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Requesting Complete Rev of CPS TS for Conversion to Improved TS Per Guidance Provided by NUREG-1434, Improved BWR-6 TS, Rev 0,dated Sept 1992 ML20076G2721994-10-14014 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Drywell Bypass Leakage Test to Be Performed at five-yr Interval ML20072E6701994-08-12012 August 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Eliminating Requirement to Perform Manual Testing of solid-state Logic Independently from self-test Sys ML20072E6191994-08-12012 August 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Allowing Drywell Bypass Leakage Rate Tests to Be Performed at Intervals as Long as Ten Years ML20072C1251994-08-0505 August 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Requirement for Accelerated Testing of Div 1 DG ML20069Q3851994-06-27027 June 1994 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.4.3.1, Reactor Coolant Sys Leakage- Leakage Detection Sys ML20069N3201994-06-16016 June 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Adding -89 After ASTM D3803 in Testing Requirements Specified for SGTS & MCR Filter Sys Charcoal & Changing Test Temp for Testing SGTS Charcoal from 80 C to 30 C ML20069K8191994-06-13013 June 1994 Proposed Tech Specs to Allow 36-inch Isolation Valve Leak Measurement Be Performed at Least Once Per 18 Months, Providing Valves Remain Closed During Period ML20070N6951994-04-26026 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Adopting Changes Recommended in NRC Re NUREG-1434 1999-01-20
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20209E0551999-07-0606 July 1999 1999 Business Plan ML20206F2231999-04-27027 April 1999 NRC Manual Chapter 0350 Restart Action Plan for Clinton Power Station ML20199H2771999-01-20020 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Table 3.3.8.1-1 to Revise Allowable Values for Degraded Voltage Relay Reset & Dropout Setpoints as Specified Per Items 1.c,1.d,2.c & 2.d ML20206E6281998-12-31031 December 1998 Rev 17 to ODCM for Clinton Power Station ML20196A0941998-11-20020 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Div 3 Diesel Generator Droop Issue ML20196A1501998-11-20020 November 1998 Revised Pages Constituting Rev 3 to CPS TS Bases,Consisting of Pages Annotated with Rev Numbers 3-1,3-2,3-3,3-4 & 3-5. Changes to Text Identified with Rev Bars.No Rev Bars Included for Changes to Format ML20155A5631998-10-23023 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs LCO 3.6.1.9, FW LCS (FWLCS) for Implementation of FWLCS Mode of RHR Sys U-603088, Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.5.13,allowing Next Scheduled Performance of LLRT of Primary Containment Penetration for RPV Head Spray Piping (IMC-042) to Be Deferred Until Seventh Refueling Outage (RF-7)1998-10-0505 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 5.5.13,allowing Next Scheduled Performance of LLRT of Primary Containment Penetration for RPV Head Spray Piping (IMC-042) to Be Deferred Until Seventh Refueling Outage (RF-7) ML20153F4201998-09-23023 September 1998 Corrected Proposed Tech Specs Bases Page B 3.8-94 Re SVC Protection Sys ML20237E4191998-08-24024 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs SR 3.8.1.17,revising Acceptance Criteria for Meeting ready-to-load Requirement for Division 3 DG ML20237C3501998-08-17017 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Partially Reducing Load at Which DGs Are Required to Be Tested Per Affected SRs in Order to Reduce Stress & Wear on Machines While Still Sufficiently Challenging Machines to Confirm Operability ML20236X0071998-07-31031 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Acceptance Criteria of SRs 3.8.1.7,3.8.1.12,3.8.1.15 & 3.8.1.20 ML20236Q4661998-07-17017 July 1998 Rev 0 to Procedure 2800.93, Emergency Reserve Auxiliary Transformer Integrated Test ML20236Q4651998-07-17017 July 1998 Rev 0 to Procedure 2800.92, Emergency Reserve Auxiliary Transformer Integrated Test ML20236Q4571998-07-17017 July 1998 Rev 0 to Procedure 2800.91, Emergency Reserve Auxiliary Transformer Test ML20216B1511998-05-0404 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Incorporating Requirements for Static Var Compensator (SVC) Protection Sys Under New TS ML20217M3351998-04-27027 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Mgt Changes Occurring in Operations Organization at Plant ML20203D5651998-02-19019 February 1998 Plan for Excellence ML20212C6951997-10-23023 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Constituting Rev 2 to CPS TS Bases.Rev Consists of Pages Annotated W/Rev Numbers 2-1 Through 2-14 ML20149J1701997-07-22022 July 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Requesting Exemption to 10CFR50,App a, General Design Criteria to Allow Operation W/Identified Offsite Circuit Condition ML20149H8991997-06-30030 June 1997 CPS Long Term Improvement Plan U-602714, Proposed Tech Specs Table 3.3.8.1-1 Re Loss of Power Instrumentation1997-04-0101 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Table 3.3.8.1-1 Re Loss of Power Instrumentation ML20133F2051997-01-0707 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 2.0 Re Safety Limits ML20133A5951996-12-13013 December 1996 Proposed TSs Re Transfer of Minority Ownership ML20134M3181996-11-19019 November 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Table 3.3.8.1-1, Loss of Power Instrumentation, by Dividing Function, Degraded Voltage - 4.16 Kv Basis & Degraded Voltage Dropout - 4.16 Kv Basis, re-numbering Items in Table & Revising Associated Notes ML20128K0711996-10-0404 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.3.8.1,adding Action Statement & Note Requiring Restoration of Inoperable Degraded Voltage Relays, Rev to Table 3.3.8.1-1 ML20134C1631996-09-20020 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS 3.3.4.1, End of Cycle Recirculation Pump Trip Instrumentation, to Delete SR 3.3.4.1.6 Which Requires RPT Breaker Interruption Time to Be Determined at Least Once Per 60 Months ML20116N1101996-08-15015 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 2.0, Safety Limits, Changing TS to Incorporate Revised SLMCPR as Calculated by GE for CPS Cycle 7 U-602619, Proposed Tech Specs 5.0, Administrative Controls, Deleting Examples Currently Included in Parentheses1996-08-15015 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 5.0, Administrative Controls, Deleting Examples Currently Included in Parentheses U-602623, Proposed Tech Specs 3.10.10, Single Control Rod Withdrawal- Refueling1996-08-15015 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.10.10, Single Control Rod Withdrawal- Refueling ML20137A1101996-08-14014 August 1996 Rev 19 to App V Second 10-Yr Interval Pump & Valve Testing Program Plan ML20137A1021996-07-10010 July 1996 Rev 5 to App IV Second 10-Yr Interval Inservice Exam Plan ML20113E7261996-06-28028 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Removal of Inclined Fuel Transfer Sys Primary Containment Blind Flange While Primary Containment Required to Be Operable U-602591, Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Utilization of RWP or Equivalent to Control Entry Into High Radiation Area, Clarifying Example Given in TS of Individuals Qualified in Radiation Protection Procedures1996-06-21021 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Utilization of RWP or Equivalent to Control Entry Into High Radiation Area, Clarifying Example Given in TS of Individuals Qualified in Radiation Protection Procedures ML20108C9431996-05-0101 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Implementing 10CFR50,App J - Option B ML20107L0011996-04-19019 April 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Listed TS to Eliminate Core Alterations as Applicable Condition for Which Associated LCO Must Be Met ML20100H8411996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing TS 3.3.4.1, End of Cycle Recirculation Pump Trip Instrumentation, to Delete SR 3.3.4.1.6 Which Requires RPT Breaker Interruption Time to Be Determined at Least Once Per 60 Months ML20100H7901996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting SR 3.3.8.1.1 Which Requires Channel Check for Loss of Power Instrumentation & Changing TS Table 3.3.8.1-1 to Change Allowable Value for Degraded Voltage Function from 3762V & 3832V to 3876V ML20100H8171996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing TS 3.4.11, RCS P/T Limits, to Incorporate Specific P/T Limits for Bottom Head Region of Rv Separate & Apart from Core Beltline Region of Rv ML20100H7741996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Proposing to Revise TS 3.6.5.1, Drywell, to Allow Drywell Bypass Leakage Tests to Be Performed at Intervals of Up to Ten Yrs Based on Demonstrated Performance of Drywell Barrier ML20095G5141995-12-14014 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs 3.3.1.1, RPS Instrumentation & TS 3.3.6.1, Primary Containment Dwl Isolation Instrumentation to Eliminate Periodic Response Time Testing of Analog Trip Modules ML20095G6401995-12-14014 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Instrumentation Associated W/High Pressure Core Spray Sys,Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Sys & Residual Heat Removal Sys ML20095G4791995-12-14014 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.2, Flow Control Valves Re Proposed Deletion of Average Rate of Movement Verification Requirement ML20117E3001995-11-0606 November 1995 Rev 18 to App V Pump & Valve Testing Program Plan ML20094D2031995-10-27027 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Consiting of Changes to TS 3.1.3 to Include 25% Surveillance Overrun Allowed by LCO 3.0.2 Into Allowances of Surveillance Notes for Control Rod Notch Testing Per SR 3.1.3.2 & SR 3.1.3.3 ML20094D2141995-10-27027 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Changes to TS 5.2.2.e to Revise Requirements for Controls on Working Hs of Unit Staff That Perform SR Functions ML20085N0621995-06-23023 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Bases,Per TS 5.5.11, TS Bases Control Program ML20085F5961995-06-0909 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Description of Exclusion Area Boundary ML20087J5691995-05-17017 May 1995 Rev 17 to App V, Pump & Valve Testing Program Plan of CPS ISI Program Manual ML20085J9701995-02-16016 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Enforcement Discretion Re TS LCO for Div 2 DC Electrical Power Sources 1999-07-06
[Table view] |
Text
-
Attachment 3 ;
to U-602499-LS-95-013 Page1of3 Attached Marked-Up Pages of the Technical Specifications ,
l J
l 1
i 4
l
~
^ 9512210055 951214 PDR ADOCK 05000461 P PDR
Attachment 3 to U-602499 l
- LS-95-013 Page 2 of 7
- FCVs 3.4.2 3.4 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM (RCS) 3.4.2 Flow Control Valves (FCVs)
LC0 3.4.2 A recirculation loop FCV shall be OPERABLE in each operating recirculation loop.
1 APPLICABILITY: MODES 1 and 2. I ACTIONS
NOTE-------------------------------------
Separate Condition entry is allowed for each FCV.
CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. One or two required A.1 Lock up the FCV. 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> FCVs inoperable.
B. Required Action and 8.1 Be in MODE 3. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> associated Completion Time not met.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.4.2.1 Verify each FCV fails "as is" on loss of 18 months hydraulic pressure at the hydraulic unit.
. P '-
1 1
-(continued)*~
s CLINTON 3.4-6 Araendment No. J' '
Attachment 3 to U-602499 LS-93-013 Page 3 of 3 3.4 2 i
SURVEILLAdREQUIREMENTS continued) [ [ /
[ SURVEILLANCE [ FREQ NCY 3.4.2.2 rify average ra of each FCV mov ent 18 onths is:
I
- a. s 11% o stroke per secon for openi ; and
- b. s 1% of stroke per econd for osing.
V - - i i )
b'5 P99- 't n M h b oedl3
\c9t- h\gnk l
CLINTON 3.4-7 AmendmentNo.JHI
Attachment 4 to U-602499
. LS-95-013 Page1of5 Technical Specification Bases Changes i
i I
l
Attachment 4 to U-602499 l
- LS-95-013 Page 2 of 5 FCVs B 3.4.2 9
I B 3.4 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM (RCS)
B 3.4.2 Flow Control Valves (FCVs)
BASES l BACKGROUND The Reactor Coolant Recirculation System is described in the Background section of the Bases for LCO 3.4.1,
" Recirculation Loops Operating," which discusses the operating characteristics of the system and how this affects -
the design basis transient and accident analyses. The jet pumps and the FCVs are part of the Reactor Coolant Recirculation' System. The jet pumps are described in the Bases for LCO 3.4.3, " Jet Pumps."
The Recirculation Flow Control System consists of the electronic and hydraulic components necessary for the positioning of the two hydraulically actuated FCVs. The .
recirculation loop flow rate can be rapidly changed within lI the expected flow range, in response to rapid changes in system demand. Limits on the system response are required to minimize the impact on core flow response during certain ,
accidents and transients. Solid state control logic will l generate an FCV " motion inhibit" signal in response to any
- one of several hydraulic power unit or analog control circuit failure signals. The " motion inhibit" signal causes hydraulic power unit shutdown and hydraulic isolation such that the FCVs fail "as is."
APPLICABL he FCV stroke Ys a d er second in SAFETY ANALYSES the openinglandpciosing directi a con i failure aximum demand. roke ra e54s-an q<e.
gg, o control 5** g h' e
- assumpti the analysis of the recircula failures decreasing an i sing flow (Refs. I and 2).
> W ese Flow control valves satisfy erion 2 of the NRC Policy Statement.
LC0 An FCV in each operating recirculation loop must be OPERABLE to ensure that the assumptions of the design basis transient and accident analyses are satisfied.
~- --
continued)
Tn oMlWon) WE LOC A candqs.'S cf ReQuence '
ge, ht %e inh \ coYe f-tow (espor4e M gwcen i n %e. Onbrob lcoP. Imp \!c.!F in%is Porr9 Coa 6hicun assornp+ ton K %:r he FCN posWors cEce6 not Chqe. i0 .e . ,
-Cals %s :s" - -
CLINTON B 3.4-9 RevisionNo.g
--r -
s- -- - , , -
Attachmeiit T to U-@@26@ F - ~~~~~
LS-95-013 i Page 3 of 5 !
FCVS B 3.4.2 )
BASES (continued) !
APPLICABILITY In MODES 1 and 2, the FCVs are required to be OPERABLE, since during these conditions there is considerable energy in the reactor core, and the limiting design basis l transients and accidents are assumed to occur. In MODES 3, !
4, and 5, the consequences of a transient or accident are j reduced and OPERABILITY of the flow control valves is not :
important. l ACTIONS A Note has been provided to modify the ACTIONS related to FCVs. Section 1.3, Completion Times, specifies once a Condition has been entered, subsequent divisions, subsystems, components or variables expressed in the l' Condition, discovered to be inoperable or not within limits, will not result in separate entry into the Condition.
Section 1.3 also specifies Required Actions of the Condition continue to apply for each additional failure, with Completion Times based on initial entry into the Condition.
However, the Required Actions for inoperable FCVs provide appropriate compensatory measures for separate inoperable FCVs. As such, a Note has been provided that allows separate Condition entry for each inoperable FCV.
A.1 With one or two required FCVs inoperable, the assumptions of the desi asis transient and accident analyses may not be
""b met and inoperable FCV must be returned to OPERABLE ;
status o ydraulically locked within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />. t
)
^p;;ing : FCY f::ter th:: th: !!:it :: ld re:elt in : : Ore- l
- vere f1= rencut tr:::t::t, re:elting in viel: tic Of th: ;
S:f:ty Li=it "CPR. Closing an FCV f::t:r th: the limit d@ D6 * :::r :c " in: LOCA :::ly:i: TOUTriTreYtfie7ecirculation dehfrs W.S ow s og, suttimfWhighe :,, _. p::ures.
ad tem f Ih an FCV is inoperab: de: t: ,,
g7%e, y -f::ter ..2 wi
_. _15t_ts.)eactiva3mfth1hraTVe T essentially lock the valve in position, which p en l wn],pr.oltibit the FCV from adversely affecting the DB end-tr:::i: ' Tnalyses. Continued operation is allowed in s l n on. 1 The 4 hour4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> Completion Time is a reasonable time period to complete the Required Action, while limiting the time of operation with an inoperable FCV.
(continued 1 CLINTON B 3.4-10 RevisionNo.)/
'. LS-954013 Page 4 of 5 FCVs
BASES ACTIONS B.1 (continued) If the FCVs are not deactivated, (locked up) and cannot be restored to OPERABLE status within the associated Completion Time, the unit must be brought to a MODE in which the LC0
~
does not apply. To achieve this status, the unit must be brought to at least MODE 3 within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. This brings the unit to a condition where the flow coastdown characteristics of the recirculation loop are not important. The allowed Completion Time of 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> is reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach MODE 3 from full power conditions in an orderly manner and without challenging unit l systems.
1 SURVEILLANCE SR 3.4.2.1 ,
REQUIREMENTS Hydraulic power unit pilot operated isolation valves located between the servo valves and the common "open" and "close" lines are required to close in the event of a loss of hydraulic pressure. When closed, these valves inhibit FCV motion by blocking hydraulic pressure from the servo valve
- to the common open and close lines as well as to the alternate subloop. This Sur illycaMf asJ%on ressur gas amorneOn we. deqn 7 Te mo ency is based on the need to perform this Surveillance under the conditions that apply during a plant outage and the potential for an unplanned transient if the Surveillance were performed with the reactor at power.
Operating experience has shown these components usually pass the SR when performed at the 18 month Frequency. Therefore, the Frequency was concluded to be acceptable from a reliability standpoint.
(SR 3'4.2.2 T s SR ens res the erall av rage rate f FCV m ement is intaine within t e analyze limits. ince th rate of CV move nt is li ited elec ronically testing ver a portion f the F travel i represe ative of all FCV positi s. Ther fore, th overall erage ra e of FCV move nt can b determin by timi the FCV movement o er ay por on of th FCV trav .g (continued)
W
\
CLINTON B 3.4-11 Revision No. M
'. LS-95-013 Page 5 of 5
- FCVs B 3.4.2 BASES {coM!M ;
_ __y -
SURVEILLA E SR 3.4.2.7 (continued) -
REQUIREM TS The 18 onth Frequency is b ed on the need to perfo this Sury llance under the co itions that apply durin a plant i out ge and the potentia for an unplanned transi t if the i S veillance were per rmed with the reactor a power.
perating experienc as shown these compone s usually pass the SR when perfo d at the 18 month Freq ncy. Therefore,
/ the Frequency was concluded to be accepta e from a reliability stan point.
REFERENCES 1. USAR, Section 15.3.2. l
- 2. USAR, Section 15.4.5.
- 3. USAR, Section 6.3.3. l l
- 4. USAR, Section 5.4.1.
l CLINTON B 3.4-12 Revision No. 1d*