ML20011D968

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Core Operating Limits Rept for LaSalle County Station Unit 1,Reload 3 (Cycle 4)
ML20011D968
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/31/1989
From:
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20011D967 List:
References
NUDOCS 9001030253
Download: ML20011D968 (19)
v • d • e


Text

.

y1 OS Core Operattag Limits Report for LaSalle County Station Unit 1, Reload 3 (Cycle 4) i

. )

9001030253 891222 N'DR ADOCK 05000373 p

PDC 2lIREP

.i w.

}

t CORE OPERATING LIMITE REPORT t

Iannancz or enamazz sinantr 5

i l

l l

I l

Affected Affected Date l

Reetlen P--

=

Bi-- ev a f ek===a i

111 111-Orlain=1 famna (cvela 4) 12/89 i

l l

t 4

i i

i 1

T LaSalle County - Unit 1 i

Cycle 4 1

.s j

+

3 l

i J

CORE OPERATING LIMITE RDORT TABLE OF CGfTENTE t

F.SSR 111

....~.:......

REFERENCES.

iv LIST OF FIGURE 8 v,

LIST OF TABLES.

1.0 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR REAT GENERATICII RATE (3/4.2.1).

1-1 1-1 1.1 Technical Specification Reference..

1-1 1.2-Description.

4 2.0 MINIMUM CRITICAL PONER RATIO (3/4.2.3).

2-1 2-1 2.1 Technical Specification Reference.

2-1 2.2 Description.

3.0 LINEAR NEAT GI2tERATICEI RATE (3/4.2.4) 3-1 3.1 Technical Specificat' ion Reference.

3-1 3.3 Description.

3 '

4.0 CCEtTROL ROD WITHDRAWAL BLOCK INSTRUNI2tTATION (3/4.3.6).

4-1 4-1 4.1 Technical. Specification Reference.

4-1 4.2 Description.

LaSalle County - Unit 1 11 Cycle 4 i

i 1

i,

l

I 1

s-h COSE OPERATIEG LIMITE REPORT REFERENCEE f

1.

Comunonwealth Edison Company Docket No. 50-374, LaSalle County Station, Unit 1 racility Operating License, License No. NPF-11.

2.

Letter from D. M. Crutchfield to All Power Reactor Licensees and Applicants, Generic Letter 88-16s.Concernitg the Removal of' Cycle-Specific r

Parsmoter Limits from Technical Specifications, dated October 4, 1988.

t 3.

Supplemental Reload License Submittal for LaSalle County Station, Unit 1.

Reload 3 (Cycle 4), 23A5972, Rev. O, June 1989.

4.

LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2, SAFER /GESTR LOCA Loss-of-Coolant-Accident Analysis, NEDC, 31510P (latest approved version).

5.

General Electric Standard Application for Reactor Fuel (GESTAR),

NEDE-24011-P-A (latest approved version).

l 1

i LaSalle County - Unit 1 111 Cycle 4 l

ZNLEP

~

i i

a I

core OPERATING LIMITS REPORT LIET or PfaumEE

~

lt Frentar

-rvt rmaar arrritzr Egg 1.2-1 Masistum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate 1-2

.[

(MAPLEGR) vs.. Average _ Planar Esposure, Initial Core <

Fuel Type 8CR3219..

~

1,2-2 Masistan Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate 1-3.

(MAPLEGR) vs. Average Planar Esposure for Fuel Type 7'

BP8CRB2990.

i e

1.2-3 Masistan Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate 1-4

'(MAPLEGR) vs. Average Planar Esposure for Fuel Type.

BC301A.

- 3 l

l 1.2-4 Masimum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate 1-5 (MAPLEGR) vs. Average Plamaa Esposure for Fuel Type BC3205.

1.2-5 Masistan Average Planar Linear Beat Generation Rate 1-6 (MAPLEGR) vs. Average Planar-Espos'tre for Fuel Type NBC301G.

1.2-6 Maximian Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate 1-7 (MAPLEGR) vs. Average Planar Esposure for Fuel Type NBC325A.

(

2.2-1 Power Distribution Limits, MCPR vs. T at Rated Flow.

2-2 2.2-2 Power Distribution Limits, MCPR vs. T at Rated Flow, 2-3 EOC-RPT Inoperable and Main Turbine Bypass Inoperable.

2.2-3 Kf Facter vs. Core Flow %

2-4 l

l LaSalle County - Unit 1 iv, Cycle 4 l

I f

4 CORE OPERATING LIMITE REPORT LIET OF TABLEE tsar

  • TTTr.r inenestyTreur g

4.2 1 Control Rod Withdrawal Block.Instrianestation Setpoints.

4-1 l

i P

i I

i l

l l

l l

I.

I t

i i

).

i:

1 i

j LaSalle County - Unit 1 y

. Cycle 4

_1 4

0 e,

i i

f r

i CORE OPERATIEG LIMITE REPORT,

1.O AyynAnE PLAHR LIEE&B EEAT GENERTI N RATE f3/4.2.11 4

1.1 TEcERICAL EPECIFICATIGE REFERENCE Technical Specification 3.2.1.

l l.

1.2 DESCRIPTIGE

The Masistas Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rates (MAPLEGE) versus Average Planar Esposure for fuel: type 8CRS219 is determined from Figure 1.2-1.

i The Masistan Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rates (MAPLEGE) versus Average Planar Esposure for fuel tYp*

BPSCRB299L'is determined from Figure 1.2 2.

The Masista Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rates (MAPLEGR) versus Average Planar Esposure for. fuel type BC301A is determined from Figure 1.2-3.

The Masistas Average Planar Linear Heat Genera

  • ion Rates (MAPLEGR) versus Average Planar-Esposure for fuel type BC3208 is determined from Figure 1.2-4.

l The Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rates l

(MAPLEGR) versus Average Planar Esposure for fuel type NBC30lG is determined from Figure 1.2-5.

l The Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rates l

(MAPLEGR) versus Average Planar Esposure for fuel type NBC325A is determined from Figure 1.2-6.-

i LaSalle County - Unit 1 1-1 Cycle 4 ZWLEP

i!

l l

e#1ckE 000 04

)

0 R

00 G

5 3

H L

P9 A1 M2

(\\

0 (B

00 eR 03 0

t a8

)

R T

e S

n p

/

oy

\\

0 d 0 W it T 052 (M a

rle e 1

n u er eF u

2 s

G r o

o

\\

00 p 1

t f 0 x a

0 E e

ee 2

)

r r

r H

a u

u t

f/

n g

r s W

ao k

a iF

(

00 0000 l

e p R

12.! 62.0 0

P n x G

22k110 0

i H

111 I11 1 0

e LE LP 5

g A

a 1

r r II r

a a e

n n v

a a A

)

l t

l s

PP

/

0 d

0 ee N

0 0

0 0

o000 0

gg 1

0N000

(

0 0

e 00 a a t

15 0

50n r r 1

23a s

ee op v v x

E AA 00 ms 0

v 5

um i xa M

7 0

0 0

0 0

0 5

0 5

5 0

2 2

1 0

0 1

1 1

1 1

eE oc5 cy = -

V*

c.i l

9 Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR;e l:

vs Average Planar Exposure for Fuel Type BP80RB299L i

.g 2

E

^

12.50

  1. N I

12.00

/

\\

t 11.50

/

N m

/

Exposte(NWdist)

NAPLHGSW/ft)

\\

\\

y 1

1 00

~ ca 5000 11.80

\\

i 5 10.50 10000 Iuo 1

I! 0 2

2 0

!!8:

88-45000 9.20 9.50 N

9.00 0

5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000 Average anar Exposure 'WWd/ST[

3 Figure 1.2-2

m Maximum Average Panar Linear Heat Generation Rate MAPLHGR; e

E vs Average Planar Exposure for Fuel Type B0301 A i

k sg hi a

/

N

13J%T==_

/

N TlLTJ4""ma 1

/

\\

b I

$11 Exposse(NWd/st)

NAPLHGR(kW/ft) x N10 20b N$3 T

g 3000 12.24 4000 12.56

'<9 5000 12.90 10000 13.40 12500 13.43 8

35000 10.69 45000 8.79

\\

50000 6.55 7

\\

S l

6 0

5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000 Average anar ~xposure 'WWd/S

3

,c;I Figure 1.2-3

Maximum Average Planar Linear Hea Generation Rate MAPLHGR;

~

=-

e

}

vs Average Planar Exposure for Fue Type B0320B i

.g K=

~

s

=:

g

=

5 THIS IS TE CIMIERVATIVE

_R 13 CassoGITE or iuE LAvTim _

[

/

SPECIFC CURUES False 0 IN I

12

/

GE DOCHENT NEDC-33510P. l E C W MONI M ING C W _

/

DOES UTILI2E THE LATTim SPECIFIC AF AGR LIMITS.

Rll Exposse(mwd /st)

MAPLHGR(kW/ft)

~

l I

0.0 11.20 T

E10

  • m 11.86 N

i

\\

,=

cs 4000 12.09 5

7000 12.77

%9 8000 12.90 N

l 3E 10000 13.08 h

12500 13.02

\\

8-35000 1012 i

45000-8.55-l 50000 8.04

\\

i 6

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000-40000 45000 50000 Average Planar Ex)osure 'WWd/ST'j t

IE Figure 1.2-4

Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR) e vs Average P anar Exposure for Fuel Type NBC301G i

E C

E 14 5

i i....

i 13 N

/

\\

EEiIC EsiE.

12

\\

E iM MONIMINS CODEI i

/

N DDES UTILI2E THE BATTIE i

SPECIFIC Aft _HGR LIMITS.

h Exposse(Ed/st)

IIAPLNGR(kWlft)

N d5,10 200 11.03 x

E$g 2000 11.

M 5000 12.58

\\

10000 13.35

\\

i

  • 8 12500 13.30 i

15000 12.97 7

tm 12.33 l

25000 11.70 h

i 35000 10.32

\\

6 45000 8.99 x

5 i

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000~

30000 35000 40000 45000 50000 55000 60000 1

Average 'lanar Exposure 'WWd/Sj

.e i

Figure 1.2-5

9 a

Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate MAPLHGR) g 5

vs Average Planar Exposure for Fuel Type NB0325A y

x c

14 Idia,N" g

a ir

/

= = =,,

12-N 70s'R""'"'".,fi

/

suciric anma units.

Y Exposwe(Ndist)

IIAPLHGR(kmftl N

7 1

1.

0 q

5000 11 7 h

10000 12.74

\\

l 2 8 12500 13.01

\\

15000 1219 7

20000 12.17

\\

25000 11.52 35000 10.21 6

45000 8.54 1

5 i

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 M

M N

M M

M Average anar Enosure [WWd/S";

3 i

Figure 1.2-6

ca p QPERATIES LIMITE REPORT 2.0 MINItant CRITICAL PONER RATIO f 1/4.2.31 2.1 TEcERIc1L RPECIFICATICEI REFERENCE Technical Specification 3.2.3.

j 2.2 DESCRIPTIfM l

i A.

Ringle Raeirenlatina Lany Operatian j

The MCFR limit when in Slagle Recirculation Loop

'{

Operation is' determined from Figure 2.2-1.plus 0.01, times the Kf factor determined from Figure 2.2-3.

l b.

Two nacirenlation Lonp operation I

The MCPR limit when.in Dual Recirculation Loop Operation is determined from Figure 2.2-1 times the Rf factor. determined from Figure 2.2-3.

j c.

'f%re Raeirenlatlan f. ann Onaratlan with Main Turb4na Ernans Innparahla i

The MCPR-limit when in Dual Recirculation Loop.

Operation with the Main Turbine Bypass Inoperable (per Technical Specification 3.7.10) is determined from Figure 2.2-2 times the Kf-factor determined from-3 Figure 2.2-3.

d.

Twa Raeirenimelan Loan onarmelan v'Ith end-af-cvela Raeirculmelan Pune Trin Eva*mm funnerable The MCPR limit when.in Dual Recirculation Loop j

operation with the End-of-Cycle Recirculation Pump Trip System (RFT) Inoperable (per Technical l

Specification 3.3.4.2) is determined from Figure 2.2-2 times the Kf factor determined from Figure 2.2-3.

LaSalle County - Unit 1 2 Cycle 4 ENLEP j

u

Power Distribution Limits HCPR g

1:i r-

"a 1.340--

3 T

w

~.--

5 g;

1.320--

BC301G/BC325A

/

/

1.300

'y-

!y 2:

M

/

1.280 -

8CR219/BP805299L

.- / *'

/

1.260 -

BC301A/BC3208 1.240

.687

.700

.720

.740

.760.

.780

.800

.820

.840

.860 y

WC)R versusT at Rated : low

^

Figure 2.2-1

~

Power DistributionI.imits MCPR - E00S

,R h

(All fuel types)

,r 1.380-

)

1

,c 5

a;

/

1.360 -

I i

/

E00-RPTInoperable,

1 1.340 -

I i

/

m 25

/

,/-

l4

s 1.320

/

'y Main Turbine Bypassinoperable i

,/

l i

1.300 -

y 1.280 lI

.687

.700

.720

.740

.760

.780

.800

.820

.840

.860 WCPR versus t'a Ra"ed flow l

Figure 2.2-2

Core Operating Limits Reperi 8

i a

/

/

l

/

l l

8

/

wE l

2

.i

/

t

-g

/

/

/

u

./

=-

o o

e

/

^

l id!

l

)

i c'>

l g/

/

a o

l t

5ll f g=

8 " cw

<a u

vc 2.u a.a

/

/

-w

/

e

=n

=

o e l

l u

E

/

=o l

M i

/

d Ei!

e

/

/

/

/

/

l m

/

/

3 9

8 8

M 8

E o

r)

LaSale-Unit 1 2-4 e 4 Cycl -

._- _-_--___ -__ _, __~ __ _ - _,

J]

j

-1 J

CORE OPERATING LIMITE RDORT

.j i

3.O LINEAR EFAT GEEEthTIGE BATE i3/4.2.$ }

3.1 TREENIciL EFECIFICATI N REFFRENcp f

Technical Specification 3.2.4.

3.2 DESCRIPTIM a.

The LEGE limit is 13.4 kw/ft for fuel types 1.

8CES219-2.

BPOCES299L t

b.

The LEGR limit is 14.4 kw/ft for. fuel typees 1.-

BC301A 2.

MC3208 3.

NBC301G i

4.

-NBC325A l

l l

i 6

LaSalle County - Unit 1 3-1 Cycle 4 l

l M

4

.i

.s

'l l

Cone OPERATING LIMITE RESORT l

4.O CCETROL ROD MITEDRAMAL Bract IMRTEEBerTkTIGE I1/4.3.8) 4.1 TECEffcAL EFECIFIc1TIGr REFERENCE Technical Specification Table 3.3.6 2.

4.2 DESC117 Tim a.

The Rod Block Monitor Upscale Instrumentation Setpoints are,

determined from the relationships shown in Table 4.2-1.

M cmTaot non WnuDanmar. nr.rrr fuRTumerraTIGr SETroInTs TRIP FmicTIGE TRIP SETFOINT ALIZEfARLE VAIRE 1.0 nod BLOCI MaffTOR A.

UPSCALE

.v

i 1.

Two Recirculation 1 0.66 W + 41 %**

1 0.66 W + 44 s** ~

Loop Operation 2.

Single Recirculation 1 0.66 W + 35.7%** 1 0.66 W + 38.7%*

Loop Operation

    • - Clamped, with an allowable value not to escoed the allowable value for recirculation loop flow (W) of 100%.

I LaSalle County - Unit 1 4-1

. Cycle-4

_,

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20011D968&oldid=4639951"