|
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20217C9121999-10-12012 October 1999 SER Input Authorizing Licensee Proposed Request to Modify Definition of Core Alteration in Section 1.0 of TS & Update Sections 3/4.1,3.4.3 & 3/4.9 to Reflect Proposed Definition Change ML20198B3801998-12-14014 December 1998 SER Accepting one-time Request for Relief from Certain Provisions of Section XI of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Per 10CFR50.55a for Certain Plant Safety/Relief Valves ML20196B1441998-11-23023 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Response to GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Bindings of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves ML20153C7621998-09-18018 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Acceping NRC Bulletin 95-002, Unexpected Clogging of RHR Pump Strainer While Operating in Suppression Pool Cooling Mode ML20236L8041998-07-0606 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Granting Licensee 980304 Request for Second 10-yr Interval Pump & Valve IST Program Plan,Rev 2, Including Changes to 2 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Relief Requests Previously Submitted in Rev 1 ML20217Q7041998-05-0404 May 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util Request to Leave Leak Chase Channels Plugged During Performance of Containment ILRT ML20203B1941997-12-0404 December 1997 Supplemental SE Accepting Proposed Changes Which Are Consistent W/Recognized Battery Stds & Station Blackout Rule ML20148T8571997-07-0303 July 1997 SER Accepting Temporary Use of Current Procedure for Containment R/R Activities Instead of Requirements of Amended 10CFR50.55a Rule to Be Reasonable ML20137D4961997-03-24024 March 1997 Safety Evaluation of Second 10-year Interval Inservice Insp Program Plan Requests for Relief CR-17 & CR-18 Commonwealth Edison Co,Lasalle County Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20135D4661996-12-0606 December 1996 Safety Evaluation Granting Relief Request RP-01 & Alternative Testing Imposed Per 10CFR50.55a(f)(6)(i) Based on Impracticality of Performing Required Testing ML20129D9401996-09-26026 September 1996 SER Accepting Licensee Cycle 8 Core Reload Design Submittal Re Application of Anfb Critical Power Correlation to Coresident GE9 Fuel as Described in TR EMF-96-021(P),Rev 1 ML20059E2871993-12-30030 December 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 57,57,45,45,93,77,152 & 140 to Licenses NPF-37,NPF-66,NPF-72,NPF-77,NPF-11,NPF-18, DPR-39 & DPR-48 Respectively ML20128E4101992-12-0101 December 1992 Safety Evaluation Accepting Relief Requests RI-22 & RI-23 from ASME Code Requirements from Hydrostatic Pressure Testing Following Replacement of RCIC Steam Supply Inboard Isolation Valve as Part of ISI Program ML20059N0301990-08-22022 August 1990 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util Response to Generic Ltr 88-01, NRC Position on IGSCC in BWR Austentic Stainless Steel Piping ML20154E5461988-09-0707 September 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 60 & 40 to Licenses NPF-11 & NPF-18,respectively ML20151X0121988-08-16016 August 1988 Safety Evaluation Re Inservice Testing Program & Requests for Relief ML20237C8761987-12-16016 December 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Facility IGSCC Insp,Per Generic Ltr 84-11 ML20237C9091987-12-16016 December 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Licensee Response to IE Bulletin 79-26,Rev 1, Boron Loss from BWR Control Blades, Per License Condition 2.C(6) ML20205R6681987-04-0101 April 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Continued Use of Static O-Ring Differential Pressure Switches ML20211P2551986-12-15015 December 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Compliance W/License Condition 2.C.(25)(d) Requirements Re Mods to Six Fire Door Stops ML20214U8501986-12-0404 December 1986 Safety Evaluation Re Util 861006 Response to IE Bulletin 79-26,Rev 1, Boron Loss from BWR Control Blades, to Satisfy License Condition 2.C(13).Response Acceptable ML20214T3991986-12-0202 December 1986 Supplemental Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee 860613 Analysis & Justification for Cable Separation Criteria to Resolve Deficiencies Described in Sser 7,App D ML20213G3181986-11-12012 November 1986 Safety Evaluation Accepting local-to-bulk Temp Difference of 12 F.Draft Technical Evaluation Rept Encl ML20215K8741986-10-21021 October 1986 Safety Evaluation Accepting Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Updated Through Rev 12.Changes Incorporated in Revs 11 & 12 Comply W/Tech Spec 6.8.2 ML20215K9631986-10-16016 October 1986 Safety Evaluation Granting Interim Acceptance of Process Control Program Updated Through 850718 ML20212Q7191986-08-29029 August 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 27 to License NPF-18 ML20205F0791986-08-11011 August 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting 860213 Procedures for Design of Single Angle Members for HVAC Hanger Frames for Plant. Related Info Encl ML20205C4051986-08-0707 August 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Facility Restart Following 860601 Feedwater Transient.Licensee Action Plan,Supplemented by Listed Actions,Adequate Basis for Restart & short-term Operation.Supporting Drawings & Matls Encl ML20206M6161986-06-23023 June 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28 Item 2.1 (Part 1) Re Equipment Classification ML20195D4121986-05-27027 May 1986 Safety Evaluation Summary of Inservice Testing Program for Pumps & Valves.Program Acceptable Subj to Listed Conditions in Encl SER ML20195D4171986-05-27027 May 1986 SER Re Pump & Valve Inservice Testing Program NUREG-0519, Safety Evaluation of Final in-plant Safety/Relief Valve Test Evaluation Rept Per SER (NUREG-0519).Design Adequate to Accommodate Loads Associated W/Activation of One or More Safety Relief Valves1986-05-19019 May 1986 Safety Evaluation of Final in-plant Safety/Relief Valve Test Evaluation Rept Per SER (NUREG-0519).Design Adequate to Accommodate Loads Associated W/Activation of One or More Safety Relief Valves ML20198B4221986-05-15015 May 1986 Supplemental Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Cable Separation Criteria Per Sser (NUREG-0519),App D.Addition of Zipper Tubing to Divisional Cables for Automatic Depressurization Sys Relief Valves Resolved NRC Concern ML20203N5531986-04-30030 April 1986 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Util IGSCC Insp Performed in Accordance W/Generic Ltr 84-11 & Satisfactory.Small Concerns Re long-term Growth of Small IGSCC Cracks Present But Not Detected During Insp Remain ML20140D6501986-03-19019 March 1986 SER Supporting Test Program,Results & Commitment for Nonqualified GE Control Switches.License Conditions 2.C.(21)(c) & 2.C.(12)(a) for Units 1 & 2,respectively,will Be Satisfied When GE Switches Removed from Engine ML20210E0961986-02-0404 February 1986 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util 851113 Proposal for Amend Changing Tech Specs to Include Previously Approved Trip Setting on Low CRD Pump Discharge Water Header Pressure & to Delete Associated Surveillance Requirement ML20137D8081985-11-18018 November 1985 Safety Evaluation Supporting Use of Mechanical Stress Improvement Process in Primary Sys Stainless Steel Piping to Modify Residual Stress Pattern at Piping Butt Welds NUREG-0889, SER Conditionally Supporting Response to Procedures Generation Package1985-10-18018 October 1985 SER Conditionally Supporting Response to Procedures Generation Package ML20137S6391985-09-30030 September 1985 Safety Evaluation Supporting Elimination of Arbitrary Intermediate Pipe Breaks.Deviation from SRP Acceptable for Piping Sys Identified in Ref 2 Except Portion of RHR Sys Made of 304SS Matl ML20129D9511985-07-16016 July 1985 Safety Evaluation Supporting Acceptance Criteria for Firecode CT Gypsum Fire Stops ML20126K9121985-07-12012 July 1985 Revised SER Re Util 831105 & 850605 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 1.1, Post-Trip Review Program. Program & Procedures Acceptable ML20129E8881985-05-24024 May 1985 SER of Util 831105 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 1.2 Re post-trip Review Data & Info Capabilities.Capabilities Acceptable 1999-10-12
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217C9121999-10-12012 October 1999 SER Input Authorizing Licensee Proposed Request to Modify Definition of Core Alteration in Section 1.0 of TS & Update Sections 3/4.1,3.4.3 & 3/4.9 to Reflect Proposed Definition Change ML20217F9091999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for LaSalle County Stations,Units 1 & 2.With ML20217A1691999-09-22022 September 1999 Part 21 Rept Re Engine Sys,Inc Controllers,Manufactured Between Dec 1997 & May 1999,that May Have Questionable Soldering Workmanship.Caused by Inadequate Personnel Training.Sent Rept to All Nuclear Customers ML20212C4501999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1999 for LaSalle County Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20210R0671999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1999 for LaSalle County Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20210C1681999-07-0909 July 1999 Seventh Refueling Outage ASME Section XI Summary Rept ML20209H1501999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for LaSalle County Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20195J7871999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1999 for LaSalle County Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20209E1431999-05-31031 May 1999 Cycle 8 COLR, for May 1999 ML20195B2591999-05-19019 May 1999 Rev 66a to CE-1-A,consisting of Proposed Changes to QAP for Dnps,Qcs,Znps,Lcs,Byron & Braidwood Stations ML20206N2071999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for LaSalle County Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20205L8421999-03-31031 March 1999 Rev 2 to EMF-96-125, LaSalle Unit 2 Cycle 8 Reload Analysis ML20205L8301999-03-31031 March 1999 Administrative Technical Requirements App B (Amend 26) LaSalle Unit 2 Cycle 8 COLR & Reload Transient Analysis Results, for Mar 1999 ML20205R2721999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for LaSalle County Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20205L8391999-03-22022 March 1999 Rev 2 to 960103, Neutronics Licensing Rept for LaSalle Unit 2,Cycle 8 ML20204C8141999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1999 for LaSalle County Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20199E4601998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Dec 1998 for LaSalle County Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20207C7371998-12-31031 December 1998 Annual Rept for LaSalle County Station for Jan 1998 Through Dec 1998 ML20205M7061998-12-31031 December 1998 Unicom Corp 1998 Summary Annual Rept. with ML20198B3801998-12-14014 December 1998 SER Accepting one-time Request for Relief from Certain Provisions of Section XI of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Per 10CFR50.55a for Certain Plant Safety/Relief Valves ML20206N2261998-12-0909 December 1998 LER 98-S03-00:on 981116,protected Area Was Entered Without Current Authorization for Unescorted Access Due to Programmatic Deficiency Error.Changed Badge Control Process ML20197K0981998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Nov 1998 for LaSalle County Station,Unts 1 & 2.With ML20196B1441998-11-23023 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Response to GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Bindings of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves ML20196A4191998-11-19019 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting QA TR CE-1-A,Rev 66 Re Changes in Independent & Onsite Review Organization by Creating NSRB ML20195D3191998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Oct 1998 for LaSalle County Station.With ML20154H6781998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1998 for LaSalle County Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20153D0191998-09-18018 September 1998 Part 21 Rept Re Defect in Gap Conductance Analyses for co- Resident BWR Fuel.Initially Reported on 980917.Corrective Analyses Performed Demonstrating That Current Operating Limits Bounding from BOC to Cycle Exposure of 8 Gwd/Mtu ML20153C7621998-09-18018 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Acceping NRC Bulletin 95-002, Unexpected Clogging of RHR Pump Strainer While Operating in Suppression Pool Cooling Mode ML20153C6771998-09-17017 September 1998 Part 21 Rept Re Defect Relative to MCPR Operating Limits as Impacted by Gap Conductance of co-resident BWR Fuel at Facilities.Operating Limit for LaSalle Unit 2 & Quad Cities Unit 2 Will Be Revised as Listed ML20151W0241998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1998 for LaSalle County Station.With ML20237E2921998-08-21021 August 1998 Special Rept:On 980811,channel 5 of Lpms Became Inoperable. Caused by Channel Failed pre-amplifier Located Inside Primary Containment at Inboard Side of Electrical Penetration E-19.Initiated Repairs of Channel ML20237E2331998-08-21021 August 1998 Revised Pages of Section 20 of Rev 66 to CE-1-A, QA Topical Rept ML20237B4861998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1998 for LaSalle County Nuclear Power Station Units 1 & 2 ML20236V7701998-07-31031 July 1998 Revised LaSalle Unit 1 Cycle 8 COLR & Reload Transient Analysis Results ML20236P8231998-07-14014 July 1998 Special Rept:From 980614-17,various Fire Rated Assemblies Were Inoperable for Period Greater than Seven Days.Caused by Test Equipment Being Routed Through Fire Doors.Established Fire Watches & on 980619 Assemblies Were Declared Operable ML20236N6751998-07-0909 July 1998 Part 21 & Deficiency Rept Re Notification of Potential Safety Hazard from Breakage of Cast Iron Suction Heads in Apkd Type Pumps.Caused by Migration of Suction Head Journal Sleeve Along Lower End of Pump Shaft.Will Inspect Pumps ML20236L8041998-07-0606 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Granting Licensee 980304 Request for Second 10-yr Interval Pump & Valve IST Program Plan,Rev 2, Including Changes to 2 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Relief Requests Previously Submitted in Rev 1 ML20236P3611998-06-30030 June 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1998 for LaSalle County Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20249C4891998-06-22022 June 1998 Special Rept:On 980522,Fire Detection Zone 1-31 Was Noted out-of-service for More than 14 Days.Detection Sys Was Taken out-of-service on 980508 to Prevent False Alarms During Hot Work Activities.Sys Was Returned to Operable Status 980528 ML20248M3101998-05-31031 May 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1998 for LaSalle County Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20236V7771998-05-31031 May 1998 Rev 1 to 24A5180, Supplemental Reload Licensing Rept for LaSalle County Station Unit 1 Reload 7 Cycle 8 ML20217Q7041998-05-0404 May 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util Request to Leave Leak Chase Channels Plugged During Performance of Containment ILRT ML20247M4491998-04-30030 April 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1998 for LaSalle County Station ML20216F4941998-03-31031 March 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1998 for LaSalle County Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20217N6581998-03-30030 March 1998 Special Rept on Fire Detection,Deluge Sys & Fire Rated Assemblies During Period of 980303-25.Established Fire Watches Until Affected Equipment Is Returned to Operable Status ML20216D9511998-02-28028 February 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1998 for LaSalle County Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20247M4631998-02-28028 February 1998 Rev Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1998 for LaSalle County Station ML20203D7241998-02-20020 February 1998 Special Rept:On 980118,Fire Detection Zones 1-18 & 2-18 Taken out-of-svc to Prevent False Alarms During Hot Work Activities on Auxiliary Electric Equipment Room Ventilation Sys.Fire Watches Will Remain in Place ML20202G9851998-01-31031 January 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Jan 1998 for LaSalle County Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20199K1651998-01-23023 January 1998 Rev 65h to Topical Rept CE-1-A, Comm Ed QA Tr 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
.. : a nag
! p k UNITED STATES g j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20886-0001 i l % >
o' l
4*****
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION l
l RELATED TO THE ACCEPTABILITY OF PERFORMING CONTAINMENT INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TESTS WITHOUT VENTING THE LEAK CHASE j COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY l
l LASALLE COUNTY STATION. UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-373 AND 50 374 i
j
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter 6ted November 26,1997, as supplemented on February 20 and April 7,1998, l Commor wself h Edison Company (Comed, the licensee) submitted for staff review its justification j for leaving i se leak chase channel plugs installed during the performance of containment j
, integrated Is ik rate tests (ILRT). This practice was identified in an NRC inspection report l 50-373/78-3S dated January 19,1979. Comed submitted its justification of the practice to the ,
! NRC in 1981. The NRC closed out this issue in inspection Report 50-373/81-28 stating the j j position that the ILRT had to be performed with the liner channel plugs removed or an exemption !
- obtained from NRC. Without further correspondence from the NRC, Comed continued to J l perform the ILRTs on both units with the leak chase channel plugs installed. The lack of i l acknowledgment from the NRC was not recognized until August 18,1997, and a License Event Report (LER 50-373/97-030) was issued. li was subsequently determined that an exemption is l not required because Comed determined that its practice satisfies the requirements of 10 CFR l Part 50, Appendix J. The November 26,1997, letter provides Comed's justification for this position.-
l
- 2.0 EVALUATION
!- The main purpose of performing a containment ILRT is to monitor the leak rate of the contain-
! ment for leaks which are most likely to occur through penetrations and hatches. The liner welds
( shou!d be leaktight. Venting the leak chase channels subjects the containment liner welds to the l leak test. The butt welds joining two liner plates define the pressure boundary. However,if the :
leak chase channels are unvented, the fillet welds attaching the channel to the liner plate i become the primary pressure boundary. The quality of these welds should be equal to or better than that of the liner welds. The leak chase channel, originally intended to provide an enclosure for pressure testing of liner welds, thus, becomes part of the containment liner and its structural integrity should be ensured. The strength of the channel box and its welds should be able to .
resist all loads and load combinations including the test loads, operating loads and postulated I accident loads. The design of the leak chase channel and its welds should meet the I p requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure 1 Vessel Code (Code) Section ill, Division 2, or American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC)
Manual of Steel Construction. The structuralintegrity of the leak chase channels as well as the containment liner should be evaluated as a part of the concrete containment.
~
9805110011 980504 PDR ADOCK 05000373 p PDR
2-The staff has reviewed the information provided by Comed in the justification of its position. The information is contained in 11 attachments to Comed's letter to NRC dated November 26,1997.
The contents of these attachments consist of information about the location and details of the leak chase channels, welding procedure, welder certification, leak test system, penetration details, loads and load combinations used, and design calculations for the leak chase channels.
Comed claims that: (1) the channel welds are qualitatively equivalent to or better than those for the primary containment liner welds, and (2) the channels will maintain their integrity when subjected to the loading conditions of a postulated design basis accident as well as during normal operation.
According to Comed, the design, fabrication and erection of the liner followed the requirements of ASME Section lil,1971 Code, Subsection NE, Winter 1972 Addenda for class MC components. The same welding procedure and weld rod material used for the butt welds of the liner plates were used for the fillet welds of the leak chase channels to the liner. The welders were qualified for both the butt welds ar'd the fillet welds. Therefore, the quality of the material !
and workmanship of the leak chase channel fillet welds is essentially the same as that of the liner I plate butt welds.
The liner seam butt welds were tested by partial radiography and 100 percent liquid penetrant or magnetic particle test. The leak chase channel fillet welds to the liner were tested by 100 percent liquid penetrant or magnetic particle test. The leaktightness of the leak chase and the liner welds was established during construction by pressure testing to the containment design pressure prior to pouring the containment concrete.
The containment liner and the attached leak chase channels are provided mainly to maintain the leaktight integrity of the concrete containment and are generally not considered to contribute any f j
structural strength to the containment. The strength of the contallment depends principally on i the concrete and reinforcing steel or prestressing steel. However, the leak chase channel should j be strong enough to resist any of the potentialloads and load combinations without jeopardizing i the integrity of the liner system, which includes the liner, its anchors and the leak chase l
channels. Comed provided the information on the loads and load combinations considered in :
the design of the containment as a whole and also on the loads acting on the leak chase I channels located in the suppression pool. As indicated above, the design of the liner system !
conforms to the criteria of the 1971 ASME Section til Subsection NE Code. The staff reviewed l the design procedure of the leak chase channels and their welds to the liner and found it to be i reasonable. Stainless steelleak chase channels (made of American Society for Testing and {
Materials (ASTM) A-240, A-276 Type 304 materials) are used on the stainless liner in the j suppression pool and channels of A-36 steel are used in the dryweel. The allowable stresses 1 used either follow the 1969 AISC or are judiciously established, considering the loading conditions. The results of the analyses for various loads and load combinations indicate the design of the leak chase channels and their weld connections to the liner meet the established criteria. However, by a letter dated February 20,1998, Comed informed the staff that there were 18 specific leak chase channels in each unit that are in direct contact with pool water and could not be demonstrated to maintain their integrity during postulated design basis accidents (DBA) due to their location with respect to the dynamic effects of the pressure suppression pool (PSP) water inventory during the postulated event. For those 18 leak chase channels on each unit, the plugs are to be permanently removed. For Unit 1, the 18 leak chase channel plugs have been permanently removed and a successful local leak rate test of each leak chase channel has been
, ,s l 3-performed. For Unit 2, the same will be done prior to the startup from the current refuel outage, L2RO7.
3.0 CONCLUSION
With the exception of the eighteen (18) specific leak channels located in the pressure suppression pool of each unit which are shown to be incapable of resisting the hydrooynamic effects and where the plugs are to be removed permanently, the following conclusion is applied to leak chase channels where the leak chase plugs are not removed during ILRT.
The staff has reviewed the information provided by Comed to justify its position for performing the containment ILRT without removing the leak chase channel plugs, thus, effectively making the leak chase channels and their welds to the liner the containment pressure boundary. Comed '
has demonstrated with the information provided that (1) the channel welds are qualitatively at least as leak resistant as the liner welds, and (2) the channels would maintain their structural integrity when subjected to containment design loads. The staff concurs with Comed's justification. However, before performing Type A containment IRLT, in addition to the visual inspection of the outside and inside surfaces of the containment as required by Appendix J, Option A, item V, the venting plugs and the leak chase channels should also be inspected, to .
ensure the structuralintegrity of the containment liner system and the concrete. '
. Principle Contributor C.P. Tan Dated: May 4, 1998