ML17342A455

Clarifies Paragraph 2 to Insp Repts 50-250/86-16 & 50-251/86-16 Re Sys Operability Reviews,Per 860226 Meeting

ML17342A455
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	04/10/1986
From:	Woody C FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	Grace J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
L-86-163, NUDOCS 8604210062
Download: ML17342A455 (3)

Text

FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY April 10, 1986 L-86-163 Dr. J. Nelson Grace Regional Administr ator, Region II 101 Marietta St. N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323

Dear Dr. Grace:

Re: Meeting Summary (Re ort Nos. 50-250/86-16 and 50-251/86-16)

The referenced Inspection Report, dated March 27, 1986, was issued as a result of a meeting held in your offices on Pebruary'6, 1986, to discuss the Turkey Point Select Systems Review Milestones. After scrutiny of paragraph 2 of the Inspection Report, pertaining to system operability reviews, and comparison with the complete discussion which occured at the Pebruary 26, 1986, meeting, the following clarification is provided:

~Para ra h Clarif in Comment 2a.(1) During the Safety Engineering Group (SEG) Phase I assessment, Select System walkdowns were conducted to check valve alignments and system material condition

~onl . Phase II walkdowns on small bore piping/tubing, breaker lists, P R ID's, and Operating Drawings have been and are being performed.

2a.(4) The SEG Phase I review of the maintenance current status and history for a sample of select and support systems was performed by a review of uncompleted Plant Work Orders (P WO's). Additionally in the maintenance area, as stated in our letter L-85-439, December 6, 1985, existing PWO work instructions have been expanded to provide general guidelines to assure root cause identification is documented on PWO's.

Journeymen, Supervisors and GEMS personnel have been directed to ensure that the "Analysis of the Cause or Reason" section of PWO's is completed. Additionally, Nuclear Job Planning System (N JPS), in trial implementation, requires an identical section to be completed on CRT screen. These actions will enhance root cause identification and appropriate corrective action implementation. NJPS, when fully automated, will automatically datalog system equipment history.

Pinally, the PEP is being enhanced to incorporate a formal, analytical-based preventive maintenance program, emphasizing INPO Good Practices, and more centralized scheduling and prioritization.

L1:1 8b042100b2 8b0410 PDR ADOCK 05000250 ZPo/

PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE

1'0 K g, '

~

4 40 e(

0 et e

I1 P ~ ~

s.vyr ~ 1 rrs Ft 0

~

V

~

ver J t 'I4r t 's 1 rf 04

~ 0 ~lee Vk 1 qt> s ms V

~ Kr ~ 4 ~ 0

~ p PfI .s r r,e t 1 s VK ~ 1 le ~ KAV t

ere'I lwtlq~qr mr

~ sV1 4 le I n(t ~ 1 es l e C

1, r seSIVIK1 r l,t.V r

I'1

<<'0>> KcV t 0 4(. **4 4'K ~ s I ~ es gse 4 Jl~ 0

~ se teer 4

sI 1 0

<<K I's

<CV /e~t 1 r '1 r rI e K'4,, V4 0 0 IK 4 ~ I~ I l g(K(K VV ~ ~ .r+ 4 sif, '

tete 1

t '

1 e~ Vsl $ 4 ~ ~ A '0 free V ~

e r ,.l ' ~

fthm [ I 0 C F 0 s'It 4

l 0

'L e

'e K I IK K ~

~1 -el 0, w $r '> <<r Ieeese'l I'I-

~ ~ re e I l r" I

~ Il rrr4; KI4 r, It l 1

f'0 llt 4 's1Vgt II lA lpe0'ls-ee4 ~ K'+res e.'

1

~  % tt 4- ~

~

~ r1 re ~ V t ']e ~ ~

• f' t 8 lr K K - f r'" I s~

1 4 K

I I ~ 1 lr, 'lI C

~ . II 4 CK I'-,,4 ~ ~

r se4re 1

i- ' ~

~

1.

.r '4I

=-+ ~ j4 ~I . I,.r,'1 s C rls ~ et 4> t pep ~ S 0 I e

Meeting Summary (Re ort Nos. 50-250/86.16 and 50-251/86-16)

Page 2

~

2a.(5) Environmental Qualification (EQ) review has been

'independently performed by the Florida Power and Light Quality Assurance Department. !n addition, Nuclear Energy and Power Plant Engineering staff resources have been applied to a thorough review of compliance with 10 CFR 50A9. Based on the foregoing, SEG Phase I did not specifically include Select System review of EQ.

2a.(6) The SEG Phase I review did not specifically address Select System management control activities. However, through the signif icant organizational enhancement designating a Site Engineering Manager reporting directly to the Site Vice President,'nd through Performance Enhancement Program (PEP) recent initiatives, primarily in the maintenance and design control areas, improvements have been and will continue to be seen in the management control area.

C.O. Wo Group i President Nuclea Energy COW/DAC:de CC: PNS-LI-86-118