ML041390218

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report - 2003

ML041390218
Person / Time
Site:	Watts Bar
Issue date:	05/14/2004
From:	Pace P Tennessee Valley Authority
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML041390218 (100)

Text

Tennessee Valley Authority, Post Office Box 2000, Spring City, Tennessee 37381-2000 MAY i 4 2004 10 CFR 50, Appendix I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:

In the Matter of ) Docket No.50-390 Tennessee Valley Authority )

WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT (WBN) UNIT 1 AND 2 - ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT - 2003 In accordance with the requirements of the WBN Unit 1 Technical Specifications, Section 5.9.2, "Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report," and the WBN Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM), Administrative Control Section 5.1, the 2002 Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) results and Data Supplement for WBN are enclosed. The REMP implements 10 CFR 50, Appendix I, Sections IV.B.2, IV.B.3, and IV.C.

The report, which is prepared by TVA's Environmental Radiological Monitoring and Instrumentation in Muscle Shoals, Alabama describes and summarizes the results of radioactivity measurements made in the vicinity of WBN and laboratory analyses of samples collected in the area. The results of the environmental samples indicated that radiation exposure to members of the general public, which may have been attributable to the operation of WBN, were negligible. The radioactivity measured was primarily the result of fallout or natural background.

-AUcl PNimed on Aycied pwer

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 MAY 14 2004 If you have any questions concerning this annual report, please contact me at (423) 365-1824.

Sincerely, P. L. Pace Manager, Site Licensing and Industry Affairs Enclosure cc (Enclosure):

NRC Resident Inspector Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 1260 Nuclear Plant Road Spring City, Tennessee 37381 Ms. Margaret H. Chernoff, Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MS 08G9 One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738 Mr. M. M. Comar, Project Manager (w/o Enclosure)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MS 08G9 One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth St., SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, Georgia 30303

L l -X Annual L Radiological Environmental La L Operating Report L

L L

1, i Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 2003 L

L L

a; I;

ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL OPERATING REPORT WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT 2003 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY April 2004

L TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .............................................. ii L List of Tables .................................................. iv List of Figures ................................................ v L Executive Summary .......................................... 1 Introduction ................................................. 2 Naturally Occurring and Background Radioactivity ................ 2 Electric Power Production ..................................... 3 Site/Plant Description .......................................... 6 L Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program ......... . .......... 8 i Direct Radiation Monitoring ..................................... 11 l ; Measurement Techniques ...................................... 11 Results.................................................... 12 L Atmospheric Monitoring ....................................... 14 Sample Collection and Analysis ................................ 14 L Results .................................................... 15 Terrestrial Monitoring ......................................... 17 Sample Collection and Analysis ................................ 17 Results .................................................... 18 L Liquid Pathway Monitoring ..................................... 20 Sample Collection and Analysis ................................ 20 Results .................................................... 22 Assessment and Evaluation ..................................... 24 L Results ................. ................................. 24 Conclusions ................................................ .25 References ................................................... 26

-i1-

L L Appendix A Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program and Sampling Locations .............................................. 30 L Appendix B 2002 Program Modifications ........................... 41 L Appendix C Program Deviations ................................... 43 Appendix D Analytical Procedures .. 46 Appendix E Nominal Lower Limits of Detection (LLD) ................ 49 L Appendix F Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program ............... 54 Appendix G Land Use Survey ................................... 60 Appendix H Data Tables and Figures .............................. 66 L

L L

L L

LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Comparison of Program Lower Limits of Detection with Regulatory Limits for Maximum Annual Average Effluent Concentrations Released to Unrestricted Areas and Reporting Levels ............. 27

-IV-

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Tennessee Valley Region ................................. 28 Figure 2 Environmental Exposure Pathways of Man Due to Releases of Radioactive Materials to the Atmosphere and Lake .................................... 29

EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

This report describes the radiological environmental monitoring program conducted by TVA in the vicinity of the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN) in 2003. The program includes the collection of samples from the environment and the determination of the concentrations of radioactive materials in the samples. Samples are taken from stations in the general area of the plant and from areas that should not be influenced by plant operations. Material sampled includes air, atmospheric moisture, water, milk, foods, soil, fish, sediment, and direct radiation levels. Results from stations near the plant are compared with concentrations from control locations and with preoperational measurements to determine potential impacts of plant operations.

The majority of environmental radioactivity measured by the program was due to naturally occurring radioactive materials or radionuclides commonly found in the environment as a result of atmospheric fallout and the operation of other nuclear facilities in the area. Low levels of Cs-137 were measured in soil samples. Trace levels of Cs-137 were also detected in fish and shoreline sediment samples. The concentrations of Cs-137 were consistent with the level normally found in the environment as the result of past nuclear weapons testing.

Tritium was detected in onsite ground water monitoring wells. Investigations are ongoing to identify the source of the tritium. In addition, Co-58, Co-60, Cs-137, and Sb-125 were identified in sediment collected from the onsite Yard Holding Pond. The level of activity measured in these on site locations would not represent a risk of exposure to the general public.

INTRODUCTION This report describes and summarizes the results of radioactivity measurements made in the vicinity of WBN and laboratory analyses of samples collected in the area. The measurements are made to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, Criterion 64 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix I, Section IV.B.2, IV.B.3 and IV.C and to determine potential effects on public health L and safety. This report satisfies the annual reporting requirements of WBN Technical Specification 5.9.2 and Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) Administrative Control 5.1.

In addition to reporting the data prescribed by specific requirements, other information is included to help correlate the significance of results measured by this monitoring program to the levels of environmental radiation resulting from naturally occurring radioactive materials.

Naturally Occurring and Background Radioactivity Most materials in our world today contain trace amounts of naturally occurring radioactivity.

Potassium-40 (K-40), with a half-life of 1.3 billion years, is one of the major types of radioactive L materials found naturally in our environment. Approximately 0.01 percent of all potassium is radioactive potassium-40. Other examples of naturally occurring radioactive materials are L beryllium (Be)-7, bismuth (Bi)-212 and 214, lead (Pb)-212 and 214, thallium (Tl)-208, actinium (Ac)-228, uranium (U)-238 and 235, thorium (Th)-234, radium (Ra)-226, radon (Ra)-222, carbon (C) -14, and hydrogen (H)-3 (generally called tritium). These naturally occurring radioactive materials are in the soil, our food, our drinking water, and our bodies. The radiation from these materials makes up a part of the low-level natural background radiation. The remainder of the natural background radiation comes from outer space.

It is possible to get an idea of the relative hazard of different types of radiation sources by L evaluating the amount of radiation the U.S. population receives from each general type of

• radiation source. The information below is primarily adapted from References 2 and 3.

U.S. GENERAL POPULATION AVERAGE DOSE EQUIVALENT ESTIMATES Source Millirem/Year Per Person Natural background dose equivalent Cosmic 27 Cosmogenic I Terrestrial 28 In the body 39 Radon 200 Total 295 Release of radioactive material in natural gas, mining, ore processing, etc. 5 Medical (effective dose equivalent) 53 L Nuclear weapons fallout less than 1 Nuclear energy 0.28 Consumer products 0.03 L Total 355 (approximately)

L As can be seen from the data presented above, natural background radiation dose equivalent to the U.S. population normally exceeds that from nuclear plants by several hundred times. This indicates that nuclear plant operations normally result in a population radiation dose equivalent which is insignificant compared to that which results from natural background radiation. It L should be noted that the use of radiation and radioactive materials for medical uses has resulted in a similar effective dose equivalent to the U.S. population as that caused by natural background LA cosmic and terrestrial radiation.

Electric Power Production Nuclear power plants are similar in many respects to conventional coal burning (or other fossil fuel) electrical generating plants. The basic process behind electrical power production in both types of plants is that fuel is used to heat water to produce steam which provides the force to turn I_ turbines and generators. In a nuclear power plant, the fuel is uranium and heat is produced in the reactor through the fission of the uranium. Nuclear plants include many complex systems to control the nuclear fission process and to safeguard against the possibility of reactor malfunction.

The nuclear reactions produce radionuclides commonly referred to as fission and activation L products. Very small amounts of these fission and activation products are released into the plant systems. This radioactive material can be transported throughout plant systems and some of it L released to the environment.

L Paths through which radioactivity from a nuclear power plant is routinely released are monitored.

Liquid and gaseous effluent monitors record the radiation levels for each release. These monitors also provide alarm mechanisms to prompt termination of any release above limits.

Releases are monitored at the onsite points of release and through the radiological environmental monitoring program which measures the environmental radiation in areas around the plant. In this way, the release of radioactive materials from the plant is tightly controlled, and verification L is provided that the public is not exposed to significant levels of radiation or radioactive materials as the result of plant operations.

The WBN ODCM, which describes the program required by the plant Technical Specifications, prescribes limits for the release of radioactive effluents, as well as limits for doses to the general L public from the release of these effluents.

The dose to a member of the general public from radioactive materials released to unrestricted areas, as given in NRC guidelines and the ODCM, is limited as follows:

Liquid Effluents Total body <3 mrem/year Any organ <10 rnrem/year Gaseous Effluents L Noble gases:

Gamma radiation <10 mrad/year L Beta radiation <20 mrad/year L Particulates:

Any organ <15 mrem/year L The EPA limits for the total dose to the public in the vicinity of a nuclear power plant, established in the Environmental Dose Standard of 40 CFR 190, are as follows:

Total body <25 mrem/year Thyroid <75 mrem/year Any other organ <25 mremn/year Appendix B to 10 CFR 20 presents annual average limits for the concentrations of radioactive materials released in gaseous and liquid effluents at the boundary of the unrestricted areas. Table 1 of this report presents the annual average concentration limits for the principal radionuclides L associated with nuclear power plant effluents. The table also presents (1) the concentrations of radioactive materials in the environment which would require a special report to the NRC and (2) the detection limits for measured radionculides. It should be noted that the levels of radioactive materials measured in the environment are typically below or only slightly above the lower limit of detection.

SITE/PLANT DESCRIPTION The WBN site is located in Rhea county, Tennessee, on the west bank of the Tennessee River at Tennessee River Mile (TRM) 528. Figure 1 shows the site in relation to other TVA projects.

L The WBN site, containing approximately 1770 acres on Chickamauga Lake, is approximately 2 miles south of the Watts Bar Dam and approximately 31 miles north-northeast of TVA's L Sequoyah Nuclear Plant (SQN) site. Also located within the reservation are the Watts Bar Dam L and Hydro-Electric Plant, the Watts Bar Steam Plant (not in operation), the TVA Central Maintenance Facility, and the Watts Bar Resort Area.

Approximately 16,000 people live within 10 miles of the WBN site. More than 80 percent of these live between 5 and 10 miles from the site. Two small towns, Spring City and Decatur, are located in this area. Spring City, with a population of approximately 2,200, is northwest and north-northwest from the site, while Decatur, with about 1,400 people, is south and south-southwest from the plant. The remainder of the area within 10 miles of the site is sparsely L populated, consisting primarily of small farms and individual residences.

The area between 10 and 50 miles from the site includes portions of the cities of Chattanooga and Knoxville. The largest urban concentration in this area is the city of Chattanooga, located to L the southwest and south-southwest. The city of Chattanooga has a population of about 153,000, with approximately 80 percent located between 40 and 50 miles from the site and the remainder located beyond 50 miles. The city of Knoxville is located to the east-northeast, with not more L than 10 percent of its 165,000 plus people living within 50 miles of the site. Three smaller urban areas of greater than 20,000 people are located between 30 and 40 miles from the site. Oak Ridge is approximately 40 miles to the northeast, the twin cities of Alcoa and Maryville are located 45 to 50 miles to the east-northeast, and Cleveland is located about 30 miles to the south.

Chickamauga Reservoir is one of a series of highly controlled multiple-use reservoirs whose II primary uses are flood control, navigation, and the generation of electric power. Secondary uses include industrial and public water supply and waste disposal, commercial fishing, and recreation. Public access areas, boat docks, and residential subdivisions have been developed along the reservoir shoreline.

WBN consists of two pressurized water reactors. WBN Unit 1 received a low power operating license (NPF-20) on November 9, 1995, and achieved initial criticality in January 1996. The full power operating license (NPF-90) was received on February 7, 1996. Commercial operation was achieved May 25, 1996. WBN Unit 2 was deferred October 24, 2000, in accordance with the guidance in Generic Letter 87-15, "Policy Statement on Deferred Plants."

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

,, Most of the radiation and radioactivity generated in a nuclear power reactor is contained within the reactor itself or one of the other plant systems. Plant effluent radiation monitors are designed L to monitor radionuclides released to the environment. Environmental monitoring is a final verification that the systems are performing as planned. The monitoring program is designed to monitor the pathways between the plant and the people in the immediate vicinity of the plant.

Sample types are chosen so that the potential for detection of radioactivity in the environment will be maximized. The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for WBN is outlined in Appendix A.

There are two primary pathways by which radioactivity can move through the environment to humans: air and water (see Figure 2). The air pathway can be separated into two components:

the direct (airborne) pathway and the indirect (ground or terrestrial) pathway. The direct airborne pathway consists of direct radiation and inhalation by humans. In the terrestrial pathway, L radioactive materials may be deposited on the ground or on plants and subsequently ingested by animals and/or humans. Human exposure through the liquid pathway may result from drinking water, eating fish, or by direct exposure at the shoreline. The types of samples collected in this program are designed to monitor these pathways.

L A number of factors were considered in determining the locations for collecting environmental samples. The locations for the atmospheric monitoring stations were determined from a critical pathway analysis based on weather patterns, dose projections, population distribution, and land L use. Terrestrial sampling stations were selected after reviewing such things as the locations of dairy animals and gardens in conjunction with the air pathway analysis. Liquid pathway stations L were selected based on dose projections, water use information, and availability of media such as fish and sediment. Table A-2 (Appendix A, Table 2: This notation system is used for all tables and figures given in the appendices.) lists the sampling stations and the types of samples collected from each. Modifications made to the WBN monitoring program in 2003 are described in Appendix B.

L Deviations occur in the monitoring program due to equipment problems with automatic sampling systems, sample unavailability or when analyses cannot be completed. Deviations to the L sampling and analysis schedule during 2003 are described in Appendix C.

To determine the amount of radioactivity in the environment prior to the operation of WBN, a L preoperational radiological environmental monitoring program was initiated in December 1976 and operated through December 31, 1995. Measurements of the same types of radioactive materials that are measured currently were assessed during the preoperational phase to establish normal background levels for various radionuclides in the environment. During the 1950s, 60s, and 70s, atmospheric nuclear weapons testing released radioactive material to the environment causing fluctuations in background radiation levels. Knowledge of preexisting radionuclide patterns in the environment permits a determination, through comparison and trending analyses, L of the actual environmental impact of WBN operation.

i_ The determination of environmental impact during the operating phase also considers the presence of control stations that have been established in the environment. Results of L environmental samples taken at control stations (far from the plant) are compared with those from indicator stations (near the plant) to aid in the determination of the impacts from WBN L operation.

L The sample analysis is performed by TVA's Environmental Radiological Monitoring and l Instrumentation (ERM&I) group located at the Western Area Radiological Laboratory (WARL) in Muscle Shoals, Alabama. Analyses are conducted in accordance with written and approved procedures and are based on accepted methods. A summary of the analysis techniques and methodology is presented in Appendix D. Data tables summarizing the sample analysis results are presented in Appendix H. The Data Supplement to this report contains the results of L all measurements made as a part of this program.

L The radiation detection devices and analysis methods used to determine the radionuclide content of samples collected in the environment are very sensitive to small amounts of radioactivity. The L sensitivity of the measurement process is defined in terms of the lower limit of detection (LLD).

L A description of the nominal LLDs for the ERM&I laboratory is presented in Appendix E.

L.

The ERM&I laboratory operates under a comprehensive quality assurance/quality control program to monitor laboratory performance throughout the year. The program is intended to L detect any problems in the measurement process as soon as possible so they can be corrected.

This program includes equipment checks to ensure that the radiation detection instruments are L working properly and the analysis of quality control samples which are included alongside routine environmental samples. To provide for interlaboratory comparison program cross L checks, the laboratory participates in a blind sample program administered by Analytics, L Incorporated. Samples split with the State of Tennessee provide an additional verification of the L overall performance of the laboratory. A complete description of the program is presented in

. Appendix F.

DIRECT RADIATION MONITORING L Direct radiation levels are measured at a number of stations around the plant site. These measurements include contributions from cosmic radiation, radioactivity in the ground, fallout L from atmospheric nuclear weapons tests conducted in the past, and any radioactivity that may be present as a result of plant operations. Because of the relatively large variations in background L radiation as compared to the small levels from the plant, contributions from the plant may be L difficult to distinguish.

Direct radiation levels measured in the area around the WBN site in 2003 were consistent with levels from previous years and with levels measured at other locations in the region.

L Measurement Techniques L Direct radiation measurements are made with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). The Panasonic Model UD-814 dosimeter is used for the measurement of direct radiation levels in the L environment. This dosimeter contains four elements consisting of one lithium borate and three calcium sulfate phosphors. The calcium sulfate phosphors are shielded by approximately 100 L mg/cm 2 plastic and lead to compensate for the over-response of the detector to low energy radiation.

The TLDs are placed approximately one meter above the ground, with two or more TLDs at each L station. Sixteen monitoring points are located around the plant near the site boundary one location in each of the 16 compass sectors. An additional 16 monitoring points are located L approximately 5 miles from the plant in each of the 16 sectors. Dosimeters are also placed at the perimeter and remote air monitoring sites and at additional locations out to approximately 32 L miles from the site. The environmental TLD locations are listed in Table A-3. The TLDs are exchanged every 3 months and the accumulated exposure is read with a Panasonic Model UD-L 710A automatic reader interfaced with a computer system for data analysis.

-1 1-

L Since the calcium sulfate phosphor is much more sensitive than the lithium borate, the measured exposure is taken as the median of the results obtained from the calcium sulfate phosphors. The values are corrected for gamma response, system variations, and transit exposure, with individual gamma response calibrations for each element. The system meets or exceeds the performance L specifications outlined in Regulatory Guide 4.13 for environmental applications of TLDs.

L Results L Results are normalized to a standard quarter (91.25 days or 2190 hours0.0253 days <br />0.608 hours <br />0.00362 weeks <br />8.33295e-4 months <br />). The monitoring locations are grouped according to the distance from the plant. The first group consists of locations within 1 mile of the plant. The second group lies between 1 and 2 miles, the third group between 2 and 4 miles, the fourth group between 4 and 6 miles, and the fifth group is made up of monitoring points more than 6 miles from the plant. Past data have shown that the average results from groups greater than 2 miles from the plant are essentially the same. Therefore, for L purposes of this report, locations 2 miles or less from the plant are identified as "onsite" and all others are considered "offsite."

l The quarterly gamma radiation levels determined from the TLDs deployed around WBN in 2003 L are summarized in Table H-i. The results from all measurements at individual stations are presented in Table H-2. The exposures are measured in milliroentgens (mR). For purposes of this report, one milliroentgen, one millirem (mrem) and one millirad (mrad) are assumed to be numerically equivalent. The rounded average annual exposures are shown below. For comparison purposes, the average direct radiation measurements made in the preoperational monitoring program for the period of 1990 to 1995 are also shown.

Annual Average Direct Radiation Levels L WBN imRlYear L 2003 Preoperational Average Onsite Stations 61 65 L Offsite Stations 57 57 L The data in Table H-1 indicate that the average quarterly radiation levels at the WBN onsite stations are approximately 1.0 mR/quarter higher than levels at the offsite stations. This difference is consistent with levels measured for the preoperation and construction phases of TVA nuclear power plant sites where the average levels onsite were generally 2-6 mR/quarter L higher than levels offsite. The causes of these differences have not been isolated; however, it is L postulated that the differences are probably attributable to combinations of influences such as natural variations in environmental radiation levels, earth-moving activities onsite, and the mass of concrete employed in the construction of the plant. Other undetermined influences may also play a part.

Figure H-I compares plots of the data from the onsite or site boundary stations with those from the offsite stations over the period from 1990 through 2003. The results reported in 2003 are consistent with direct radiation levels reported in previous years. There is no indication that WBN activities increased the background radiation levels normally observed in the areas surrounding the plant.

ATMOSPHERIC MONITORING The atmospheric monitoring network is divided into three groups identified as local, perimeter, L and remote. Four local air monitoring stations are located on or adjacent to the plant site in the general directions of greatest wind frequency. Four perimeter air monitoring stations are located L between 6 to 11 miles from the plant, and two remote air monitors are located out to 15 miles.

The monitoring program and the locations of monitoring stations are identified in the tables and L figures of Appendix A. The remote stations are used as control or baseline stations.

Results from the analysis of samples in the atmospheric pathway are presented in Tables H-3, H-4, and H-5. Radioactivity levels identified in this reporting period are consistent with background and preoperational program data. There is no indication of an increase in atmospheric radioactivity as a result of WBN.

Sample Collection and Analysis L Air particulates are collected by continuously sampling air at a flow rate of approximately 2 cubic feet per minute (cfm) through a 2-inch glass fiber filter. The sampling system consists of a pump, a magnehelic gauge for measuring the drop in pressure across the system, and a dry gas I meter. This allows an accurate determination of the volume of air passing through the filter.

L This system is housed in a building approximately 2 feet by 3 feet by 4 feet. The filter is contained in a sampling head mounted on the outside of the monitor building. The filter is replaced weekly. Each filter is analyzed for gross beta activity about 3 days after collection to allow time for the radon daughters to decay. Every 4 weeks composites of the filters from each location are analyzed by gamma spectroscopy.

Gaseous radioiodine is sampled using a commercially available cartridge containing TEDA-L impregnated charcoal. This system is designed to collect iodine in both the elemental form and as organic compounds. The cartridge is located in the same sampling head as the air particulate filter and is downstream of the particulate filter. The cartridge is changed at the same time as the particulate filter and samples the same volume of air. Each cartridge is analyzed for I-131 by L gamma spectroscopy analysis.

L During 2003 modifications were made in the WBN REMP to provide for additional monitoring L of tritium. Sampling of atmospheric moisture for the purpose of airborne tritium monitoring was implemented at eight (six indicator and two control) of the WBN atmospheric monitoring L locations. Atmospheric moisture sampling is conducted by pulling air at a constant flow rate through a column loaded with approximately 400 grams of silica gel. Every two weeks, the column is exchanged on the sampler. The atmospheric moisture is removed from silica gel by heating and analyzed for tritium.

L Rainwater is collected by use of a collection tray attached to the monitor building. The collection L tray is protected from debris by a screen cover. As water drains from the tray, it is collected in one of two 5-gallon containers inside the monitor building. A 1-gallon sample is removed from

l. the container every 4 weeks. Any excess water is discarded. Rainwater samples are held to be analyzed only if air particulate samples indicate the presence of elevated levels or if fallout is expected. For example, rainwater samples were analyzed during the period of fallout following the accident at Chernobyl in 1986. Since no plant-related air activity was detected in 2003, no rainwater samples from WBN were analyzed in this reporting period.

C Results The results from the analysis of air particulate samples are summarized in Table H-3. Gross beta activity in 2003 was consistent with levels reported in previous years. The average gross beta l activity measured for air particulate samples was 0.019 pCi/m 3 . The annual averages of the gross beta activity in air particulate filters at these stations for the period 1977-2003 are presented in L Figure H-2. Increased levels due to fallout from atmospheric nuclear weapons testing are evident in the years prior to 1981 and a small increase from the Chernobyl accident can be seen in 1986.

L These patterns are consistent with data from monitoring programs conducted by TVA at other nuclear power plant construction sites. Comparison with the same data for the preoperational period of 1990-1995 indicates that the annual average gross beta activity for air particulates as measured in the 2003 monitoring program was consistent with preoperational data.

L Only natural radioactive materials were identified by the monthly gamma spectral analysis of the L air particulate samples. As shown in Table H4, I-131 was not detected in any charcoal cartridge samples collected in 2003.

The results for atmospheric moisture sampling are reported in Table H-5. No tritium was detected above the nominal LLD value of 3.0 pCi/cubic meter.

TERRESTRIAL MONITORING L Terrestrial monitoring is accomplished by collecting samples of environmental media that may transport radioactive material from the atmosphere to humans. For example, radioactive material may be deposited on a vegetable garden and be ingested along with the vegetables or it may be deposited on pasture grass where dairy cattle are grazing. When the cow ingests the radioactive material, some of it may be transferred to the milk and consumed by humans who drink the milk.

L Therefore, samples of milk, soil, and food crops are collected and analyzed to determine potential impacts from exposure through this pathway. The results from the analysis of these samples are shown in Tables H-6 through H-12.

A land use survey is conducted annually between April and October to identify the location of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence, and the nearest garden of greater than 500 square feet producing fresh leafy vegetables in each of 16 meteorological sectors within a distance of 5 miles from the plant. This land use survey satisfies the requirements 10 CFR 50, Appendix I, Section IV.B.3. From data produced by the land use survey, radiation doses are projected for individuals living near the plant. Doses from air submersion are calculated for the nearest residence in each sector, while doses from drinking milk or eating foods produced near the plant are calculated for the areas with milk-producing animals and gardens, respectively. These dose projections are hypothetical extremes and do not represent actual doses to the general public.

The doses projected as a result of the 2003 land use survey are presented in Appendix G.

Sample Collection and Analysis Milk samples are collected every 2 weeks from three indicator dairies and from at least one control dairy. Milk samples are placed on ice for transport to the radioanalytical laboratory. A specific analysis for 1-131 and a gamma spectral analysis are performed on each sample and once per quarter samples are analyzed for Sr-89 and Sr-90.

The monitoring program includes a provision for sampling of vegetation from locations where milk is being produced and when milk sampling cannot be conducted. There were no periods L during 2003 when vegetation sampling was necessary.

L Soil samples are collected annually from the air monitoring locations. The samples are collected with either a "cookie cutter" or an auger type sampler. After drying and grinding, the sample is L analyzed by gamma spectroscopy. When the gamma analysis is complete, the sample is ashed L and analyzed for Sr-89 and Sr-90.

Samples representative of food crops raised in the area near the plant are obtained from individual gardens, comer markets, or cooperatives. Types of foods may vary from year to year as a result of changes in the local vegetable gardens. In 2003 samples of apples, cabbage, corn, green beans, and tomatoes, were collected from local vegetable gardens and/or farms. Samples of the same food products grown in areas that would not be effected by the plant were collected as control samples. The edible portion of each sample is analyzed by gamma spectroscopy.

Results L The results from the analysis of milk samples are presented in Table H-6. All 1-131 values were below the established nominal LLD of 0.4 pCi/liter. The results for the quarterly Sr-89, Sr-90 analysis were also below the established LLD's for these analyses. The gamma isotopic analysis L of milk samples detected only naturally occurring radionuclides. The predominant isotope L reported in milk samples was the naturally occurring K-40.

L Consistent with most of the environment, Cs-137 was detected in all of the soil samples collected in 2003. The maximum concentration of Cs-137 was 0.57 pCi/g. The concentrations were L consistent with levels previously reported from fallout. All other radionuclides reported were i naturally occurring isotopes. The results of the analysis of soil samples are summarized in Table L H-7.

L A plot of the annual average Cs-137 concentrations Concentrations of in soil is presented Cs-137 in soil are in Figure H-3.

steadily decreasing testing in the atmosphere, as a result of the cessation the 30 year half-life of weapons of Cs-I 37, and transport through the environment.

The radionuclides measured in food samples were naturally in Tables H-8 through occurring. The results H-12. are reported L

L LU LIOUID PATHWAY MONITORING Potential exposures from the liquid pathway can occur from drinking water, ingestion of edible fish and invertebrates, or from direct radiation exposure from radioactive materials deposited in L the shoreline sediment. The aquatic monitoring program includes the collection of samples of river (surface) water, groundwater, drinking water supplies, fish, and shoreline sediment.

Indicator samples were collected downstream of the plant and control samples collected within the reservoir upstream of the plant or in the next upstream reservoir (Watts Bar Lake).

Results from the analysis of the liquid pathway samples are presented in Table H-13 through H-19. Radioactivity levels in surface and public water, fish, and shoreline sediment were consistent with background and/or fallout levels previously reported. Low levels of Cs-137 were measured in samples of shoreline sediment and fish. Tritium was detected in samples of ground water collected from onsite monitoring wells. The tritium concentrations were low and presented no risk of exposure to site personnel or the public. Results for the sediment sampling conducted in the onsite Yard Holding Pond are discussed later in this section.

iL Sample Collection and Analysis Samples of surface water are collected from the Tennessee River using automatic sampling systems from two downstream stations and one upstream station. A timer turns on the system at least once every 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />. The line is flushed and a sample collected into a composite container.

A I-gallon sample is removed from the container at 4-week intervals and the remaining water is discarded. Each sample is analyzed for gamma-emitting radionculides, gross beta activity, and tritium.

Samples are also collected by an automatic sampling system at the first two downstream drinking water intakes. These samples are collected in the same manner as the surface water samples.

These monthly samples are analyzed for gamma-emitting radionuclides, gross beta activity, and tritium. The samples collected by the automatic sampling device are taken directly from the river at the intake structure. Since the sample at this point is raw water, the upstream surface water L sample is used as a control sample for drinking water.

Groundwater is sampled from one onsite well down gradient from the plant and one onsite well up gradient from the plant. Four additional onsite ground water monitoring wells were added in L 2003. The onsite wells are sampled with a continuous sampling system. These four new wells are located along underground discharge lines. A composite sample is collected from the onsite wells every four weeks and and analyzed for gamma-emitting radionuclides, gross beta activity, tritium content. In addition, a grab sample is collected every four weeks from a private well in an l area unaffected by WBN. The grab sample is also analyzed for gross beta activity, gamma-emitting radionuclides, and for tritium.

Samples of commercial and game fish species are collected semiannually from each of two reservoirs: the reservoir on which the plant is located (Chickamauga Reservoir) and the upstream reservoir (Watts Bar Reservoir). The samples are collected using a combination of netting techniques and electrofishing. The ODCM specifies analysis of the edible portion of the fish. To comply with this requirement, filleted portions are taken from several fish of each species. The samples are analyzed by gamma spectroscopy.

L Samples of shoreline sediment are collected from recreation areas in the vicinity of the plant.

The samples are dried, ground, and analyzed by gamma spectroscopy.

Samples of sediment are also collected from the onsite Yard Holding Pond. A total of five samples were collected in 2003.

L. Results Gross beta activity was detectable above the nominal LLD in most of the surface water samples.

Lo The gross beta concentrations averaged 3.6 pCi/liter in downstream samples and 2.7 pCi/liter in upstream samples. These levels were consistent with results found during the preoperational L monitoring program. A summary table of the results is shown in Table H-13.

L No fission or activation products were identified in drinking water samples. Average gross beta l activity at downstream stations was 2.7 pCi/liter while the average for upstream stations was also 2.7 pCi/liter. The results are shown in Table H-14. Trend plots of the gross beta activity in surface water and drinking water samples from 1977 through 2003 are presented in Figure H-4.

The gamma isotopic analysis of ground water samples identified only naturally occurring radionuclides. Gross beta concentrations in samples from the onsite indicator locations averaged 5.6 pCi/liter. The average gross beta activity for samples from the control locations was 2.5 pCi/liter. As noted earlier, tritium was detected in samples from the onsite monitoring wells.

The maximum concentration measured in the four-week composite samples from the onsite wells was 24,900 pCi/L. Investigations to identify the source of tritium are ongoing. There was no tritium detected in the onsite up gradient well or the offsite ground water monitoring location.

The results are presented in Table H-15.

Measurable levels of Cs-137 were identified in a total of eight fish samples. The maximum Cs-L 137 concentration was 0.07 pCi/g measured in commercial fish collected at the upstream control location. Other radioisotopes found in fish were naturally occurring, with the most notable being K-40. The results are summarized in Tables H-16 and H-17. Trend plots of the annual average Cs-137 concentrations measured in fish samples are presented in Figure H-S. The Cs-137

4. activities are consistent with preoperational results produced by fallout or effluents from other nuclear facilities.

Low levels of Cs-137 consistent with the concentrations present in the environment as the result of past nuclear weapons testing or other nuclear operations in the area were measured in samples of shoreline sediment. The results for the analysis of shoreline sediment is presented in L Table H-18. Trend plots of the average concentration of Cs-137 in shoreline sediment are presented in Figure H-6.

Consistent with previous monitoring conducted for the onsite ponds, Cs-137 was detected in the sediment samples. The average of the Cs-137 levels measured in sediment from the onsite ponds l: was 0.06 pCi/gm. In addition, Co-60, Co-58, and Sb-125 were also detected in some of the samples collected from the Yard Holding Pond. The results for the analysis of pond sediment samples are provided in Table H-19. Since these radionuclides were present in relatively low concentrations and confined to the Yard Holding Pond located in the owner controlled area not open to the general public, the presence of these radionuclides would not represent any increased risk of exposure to the general public.

ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Potential doses to the public are estimated from measured effluents using computer models.

These models were developed by TVA and are based on guidance provided by the NRC in Regulatory Guide 1.109 for determining the potential dose to individuals and populations living in the vicinity of the plant. The results of the effluent dose calculations are reported in the Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report. The doses calculated are a representation of the L dose to a "maximum exposed individual." Some of the factors used in these calculations (such as ingestion rates) are maximum expected values which will tend to overestimate the dose to the "hypothetical" person. The calculated maximum dose due to plant effluents are small fractions of the applicable regulatory limits. In reality, the expected dose to actual individuals is significantly lower.

Based on the very low concentrations of radionuclides actually present in the plant effluents, radioactivity levels measured in the environment as result of plant operations are expected to be L negligible. The results for the radiological environmental monitoring conducted for the WBN 2003 operations confirm this expectation.

Results As stated earlier in this report, the estimated increase in radiation dose equivalent to the general public resulting from the operation of WBN is insignificant when compared to the dose from natural background radiation. The results from each environmental sample are compared with the concentrations from the corresponding control stations and appropriate preoperational and background data to determine influences from the plant. During this report period, Cs-137 was detected in shoreline sediment, soil, and fish collected for the WBN program. The concentrations measured were consistent with levels measured during the preoperational monitoring program.

The levels of tritium detected in the onsite ground water monitoring wells and the radionuclides measured in samples of sediment from the Yard Holding Pond were not included in the assessment of doses from environmental radiation. These radionuclides were limited to the owner controlled area and would not present an exposure pathway for the general public.

Conclusions L It is concluded from the above analysis of environmental samples and from the trend plots presented in Appendix H, that exposure to members of the general public which may have been attributable to WBN is negligible. The radioactivity reported herein is primarily the result of fallout or natural background. Any activity which may be present in the environment as a result of plant operations does not represent a significant contribution to the exposure of Members of the Public.

REFERENCES

1. Merril Eisenbud, Environmental Radioactivity, Academic Press, Inc., New York, NY, 1987.

2. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Report No. 93, "Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States," September 1987.

3. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 8.29, "Instruction Concerning Risks from Occupational Radiation Exposure," July 1981.

Table 1 COMPARISON OF PROGRAM LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION WITH THE REGULATORY LIMITS FOR MAXIMUM ANNUAL AVERAGE EFFLUENT CONCENTRATIONS RELEASED TO UNRESTRICTED AREAS AND REPORTING LEVELS Concentrations in Water pCi/Liter Concentrations in Air. pCi/Cubic Meter Effluent Reporting Lower limit Effluent Reporting Lower limit Concentration' Level 2 of Detection3 Concentration' Level 2 of Detection 3 H-3 1,000,000 20,000 300 100,000 3.00 Cr-51 500,000 45 30,000 0.02 Mn-54 30,000 1,000 5 1,000 0.005 Co-58 20,000 1,000 5 1,000 0.005 Co-60 3,000 300 5 50 0.005 Zn-65 5,000 300 10 400 0.005 Sr-89 8,000 5 1,000 0.0011 Sr-90 500 2 6 0.0004 Nb-95 30,000 400 5 2,000 0.005 Zr-95 20,000 400 10 400 0.005 Ru-103 30,000 5 900 0.005 Ru-106 3,000 40 20 0.02 1-131 1,000 2 OA 200 0.9 0.03 Cs-134 900 30 5 200 10 0.005 Cs-137 1,000 50 5 200 20 0.005 Ce-144 3,000 30 40 0.01 Ba-140 8,000 200 25 2,000 0.015 La-140 9,000 200 10 2,000 0.01 Note: I pCi = 3.7 x10 2 Bq.

Note: For those reporting levels that are blank, no value is given in the reference.

1 Source: Table 2 of Appendix B to 10 CFR 20.1001-20.2401 2 Source: WBN Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, Table 2.3-2 3 Source: Table E-I of this report.

r.: r r>- r- or- r-- or- r-- or: r~ r-- r -- -r- r - r:-- r- r,,- r-- r-IN I D. TENNE

'IO (TVAA h L

.OWUNG L m )os I

'A aRPo S ~~~tsA i

} 5Hi HV~tEa oo0 Raq\x SS SE D

Figure 2 ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS OF MAN DUE TO RELEASES OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL TO THE ATMOSPHERE AND LAKE.

Diluted By Atmosphere Airborne Releases Plume Exposure Liquid Releases Diluted By Lake MAN Animals Consumed By Man (Milk,MeatI Shoreline lc Exposure Consumed By Animals Drinking Water Fish Vegetation Uptake From Soil APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM AND SAMPLING LOCATIONS u1- r -- r r- r- --- r7- r . r--- -r - rF r F- r-- r- - r- - -

Table A-I WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Exposure Pathway Number of Samples and Sampling and Type and Frequency and/or Sample Locations" Collection Frequencv of Analysis

1. AIRBORNE

a. Particulates 4 samples from locations (in different Continuous sampler operation with Analyze for gross beta radioactivity sectors) at or near the site boundary sample collection weekly (more greater than or equal to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> (LM-1, 2, 3, and 4). (frequently if required by dust following filter change. Perform loading). gamma isotopic analysis on each sample if gross beta is greater than 10 times yearly mean of control sample.

Composite at least once per 31 days I (by location) for gamma scan.

4 samples from communities approximately 6-10 miles from the plant (PM-2, 3, 4, and 5).

2 samples from control locations greater than 10 miles from the plant (RM-2 and 3).

b. Radioiodine Samples from same locations as air Continuous sampler operation with 1-131 at least once per 7 days.

particulates. filter collection weekly. Analysis is performed by gamma spectroscopy.

c. Atmospheric 4 samples from locations (in different Continuous sampler operation with Analyze each sample for tritium.

Moisture sectors) at or near the site boundary sample collection biweekly.

(LM-l, 2, 3, and 4) 2 samples from communities approximately 4-10 miles distance from the plant (PM-2, 5).

r- U- r r- r r r-- r- - w- F- r-- r-___I r-- r F, Table A-I WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMa Exposure Pathway Number of Samples and Sampling and Type and Frequency and/or SaMple Locationsb Collection Frequency of Analysis

c. Atmospheric 2 samples from control location Moisture (Cont.) greater than 10 miles from the plant (RM-2 and RM-3).

d. Rainwater Samples from same locations as air Rainwater collected continuously with Analyzed fro gamma activity only if particulates. composite sample taken monthly. radioactivity in other media indicates the presence of increased levels of fallout I e. Soil Samples from same location as air Once per year. Gamma scan, Sr-89, Sr-90 once per particulates. year.

2. DIRECT 2 or more dosimeters (TLDs) placed At least once per 92 days. Gamma dose at least once per 92 At or near the site boundary in each days.

of the 16 sectors.

2 or more dosimeters placed at stations located approximately 5 miles from the plant in each of the 16 sectors.

2 or more dosimeters in at least 8 additional locations of special interest, including at least 2 control stations.

r - r- r- r- r-- r-- r-- [ nF r- n-r--r-- r r-- r--- r- r. r-- r, Table A-I WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM' Exposure Pathway Number of Samples and Sampling and Type and Frequency and/or Sample Locationsb Collection Frequencv of Analysis

3. WATERBORNE

a. Surface 2 samples downstream from plant Collected by automatic sequential- Gross beta, gamma scan, and tritium discharge (TRM 517.9 and TRM type sampler' with composite samples analysis of each sample.

523.1). collected over a period of approximately 31 days.

I sample at a control location upstream from the plant discharge (TRM 529.3).

Lij

b. Ground Five sampling locations from Collected by automatic sequential- Gross beta, gamma scan, and tritium groundwater monitoring wells type sampler' with composite samples analysis of each sample.

adjacent to the plant (Wells No. 1, A, collected over a period of B, C, and D). approximately 31 days.

I sample from ground water source up Same as Well No. 1. Gross beta, gamma scan, and tritium gradient (Well No. 5). analysis of each sample.

1 sample from ground water source up Grab sample at least once per 31 Gross beta, gamma scan, and tritium gradient (Farm L). days. analysis of each sample.

c. Drinking I sample at the first two potable Collected by automatic sequential- Gross beta, gamma scan, and tritium surface water supplies, downstream type sampler' with composite sample analysis of each sample.

from the plant (TRM 503.8 and TRM collected monthly.

473.0).

v - r- r-. r- --- r r r-n- F Fr_ r- r_ rA-- , r- r-17-Table A- I WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM' Exposure Pathway Number of Samples and Sampling and Type and Frequency and/or Sample Locationsb Collection Frequency of Analysis

c. Drinking (Con't) I sample at a control location TRM 5 2 9 .3 d.

d. Sediment from I sample downstream from plant At least once per 184 days. Gamma scan of each sample.

Shoreline Discharge (TRM 513.0).

I sample from a control location upstream from plant discharge (TRM 530.2).

I e. Pond Sediment I sample from at least three locations At least once per year. Gamma scan of each sample.

W

-P- in the Yard Holding Pond.

I

5. INGESTION

a. Milk 3 samples from farms and/or dairies Every 2 weeks. 1-131 and gamma analysis on each in the immediate vicinity of the plant. sample. Sr-89 and Sr-90 once per quarter.

I or more samples from control locations.

b. Fish One sample of commercially important At least once per 184 days. Gamma scan on edible portions.

species and one sample of recreationally important species.

One sample of each species from Chickamauga and Watts Bar Reservoirs.

q

[ rF-. r- - F F- - r r-- r r- r -- r- r- r- r - r-, r-- r-Table A-I WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Exposure Pathway Number of Samples and Sampling and Type and Frequency and/or Sample Locations" Collection Frequency of Analysis

c. Vegetation' Samples from farms producing milk At least once per 31 day. 1- 131 analysis and gammia scan of (Pasturage and but not providing a milk sample. each sample.

grass)

d. Food Products I sample each of principal food Annually at time of harvest. The Gamma scan on edible portion.

products grown at private gardens types of foods available for sampling I and/or farms in the immediate will vary. Following is a list of vicinity of the plant. typical foods which may be available:

Cabbage, Lettuce and/or Greens Corn Green Beans Potatoes Tomatoes

a. The sampling program outlined in this table is that which was in effect at the end of 2003.

b. Sample locations are shown on Figures A-I, A-2, A-3.

c. Samples shall be collected by collecting an aliquot at intervals not exceeding 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.

d. The samples collected at TRMs 503.8 and 473.0 are taken from the raw water supply, therefore, the upstream surface water sample will be considered the control sample for drinking water.

e. Vegetation sampling is applicable only for farms that meet the criteria for milk sampling and when milk sampling cannot be performed.

Table A-2 WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING LOCATIONS Map Approximate Indicator (I)

Location Distance or Samples Nutnber Station (Miles) Control Collectedb (CL 2 PM-2 NW 7.0 I APCF,RSAM 3 PM-3 NNE 10.4 I AP,CF,R,S 4 PM-4 NE/ENE' 7.6 I AP,CFRS 5 PM-S S 8.0 I AP,CFS,AM 6 RM-2 SW 15.0 C AP,CFR,S,AM 7 RM-3 NNW 15.0 C AP,CFR,S,AM 8 LM-1 SSW 0.5 I AP,CF,R,SAM 9 LM-2 NNE 0.4 I APCF,R,SAM 10 LM-3 NNE 1.9 I APCF,R,S,AM 11 LM-4 SE 0.9 I APCF,R,S,AM 12 Farm L SSW 1.3 1 M,W 15 Farrn K ENE 11.6 C M 18 Well #1 S 0.6 I W 19 Farm Mu ESE 3.7 I M 20 Farm N ESE 4.1 I M 22 Farm EH SSW 24.0 C M 23 Well #5 N 0.5 C W 25 TRM 517.9 9.9e I SW 26 TRM 523.1 4.7' I SW 27 TRM 529.3 1.5' C SWPWI 31 TRM 473.0 54.8' I PW (C. F. Industries) 32 TRM 513.0 14.8' I SS 33 TRM 530.2 2.4' C SS 35 TRM 503.8 24.0' I PW (Dayton) 38 Chickamauga I F Reservoir 39 Watts Bar Reservoir C F 81 Yard Pond SSE/S/SSW Onsite I PS 82 Well A SSE 0.6 I W 83 Well B SSE 0.5 I W 84 Well C ESE 0.3 I W 85 Well D SSE OA I W

a. See Figures A-1, A-2, and A-3

b. Sample codes:

AM = Atmospheric Moisture AP = Air particulate filter PW = Public Water SS = Shoreline sediment CF = Charcoal filter PS = Pond Sediment SW = Surface water F = Fish R = Rainwater W =Well water M = Milk S = Soil

c. Station located on the boundary between these two sectors.

d. A control for well water.

e. Distance from the plant discharge (TRM 527.8)

f. The surface water sample is also used as a control for public water.

Table A-3 WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETER (TLD) LOCATIONS Map' Approximate Onsite (On)b Location Distance or Number Station Sector (mfies) Offsite (Off) 2 NW-3 NW 7.0 Off 3 NNE-3 NNE 10.4 Off 4 ENE-3 NE/ENE 7.6 Off 5 S-3 S 7.8 Off 6 SW-3 SW 15.0 Off 7 NNW-4 NNW 15.0 Off 10 NNE-IA NNE 1.9 On I1 SE-IA SE 0.9 On 12 SSW-2 SSW 1.3 On 14 W-2 W 4.8 Off 15 E-3 E 15.0 Off 40 N-I N 1.2 On 41 N-2 N 4.7 Off 42 NNE-I NNE 1.2 On 43 NNE-2 NNE 4.1 Off 44 NE-I NE 0.9 On 45 NE-2 NE 2.9 Off 46 NE-3 NE 6.1 Off 47 ENE-I ENE 0.7 On 48 ENE-2 ENE 5.8 Off 49 E-1 E 1.3 On 50 E-2 E 5.0 Off 51 ESE-I ESE 1.2 On 52 ESE-2 ESE 4.4 Off 54 SE-2 SE 5.3 Off 55 SSE-IA SSE 0.6 On 56 SSE-2 SSE 5.8 Off 57 S-I S 0.7 On 58 S-2 S 4.8 Off 59 SSW-I SSW 0.8 On 60 SSW-3 SSW 5.0 Off 62 SW-I SS 0.8 On 63 SW-2 SW 5.3 Off 64 WSW-I WSW 0.9 On 65 WSW-2 WSW 3.9 Off 66 W-1 W 0.9 On 67 WNW-I WNW 0.9 On 68 WNW-2 WNW 4.9 Off 69 NW-I NW 1.1 On 70 NW-2 NW 4.7 Off 71 NNW-I NNW 1.0 On 72 NNW-2 NNW 4.5 Off 73 NNW-3 NNW 7.0 Off 74 ENE-2A ENE 3.5 Off 75 SE-2A SE 3.1 Off 76 S-2A S 2.0 Off 77 W-2A W 3.2 Off 78 NW-2A NW 3.0 Off 79 SSE-1 SE 0.5 On

a. See Figures A-1, A-2, and A-3.

b. TLDs designated "onsite" are located 2 miles or less from the plant; "offsite" are located more than 2 miles from the plant.

L Figure A-1 Radiological Environmental Sampling Locations L -Within 1Mile of the Plant L

LNNW 487_N112 NNE j326 25 /1 / 33.75 WNN \ t ft NE l r NUCLEAR PLANT E U~55 23.2 2213.75 18

• 123.75146.25 L2 191.25 s 168.75 Scale 0 Mle Figure A-2 Radiological Environmental Sampling Locations From 1 to 5 Miles From The Plant I'

Scale 0 1 2 MSis Figure A-3 Radiological Environmental Sampling Locations Greater Than 5 Miles From the Plant L

L U

1825" 6826 SW o 257 acme Ukis 20 2 40-

APPENDIX B 2003 PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS 41-

Appendix B Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Modification Modifications were implemented for the WBN REMP during 2003 to increase the level of environmental tritium monitoring conducted in the program. These modifications were made to provide for additional monitoring during the tritium production project initiated in September 2003. The modifications included the addition of atmospheric moisture sampling, increasing the L frequency of tritium analyses for water pathway samples and adding additional ground water monitoring locations.

During 2003, one of the two dairy farms used as control sampling locations for milk (Farm B) went out of business. A replacement monitoring location was identified at 11.6 miles ENE (Farm K) and added to the WBN REMP.

Tables A-1 and A-2 and Figures A-1 and A-3 of this report were revised as applicable to reflect these modifications.

APPENDIX C PROGRAM DEVIATIONS Appendix C Program Deviations During 2003, problems with sampling equipment resulted in sample unavailability or inadequate sample volumes for two sets of air particulate filter and charcoal cartridge samples from one of ten sample locations. In addition, flooding damaged the sampler at one of the two downstream surface water monitoring locations resulting in a missed sample for one sampling period.

Table C-1 provides additional details of these program deviations.

Tr -- C. E- ri - --r-- r.- r: t-- rt F Ir-I -- r -r- r_ -

Table C-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Deviations Date Station Location Remarks 12/30/02 RM-3 15.0 miles NNW Air sampling volume for air filter and charcoal cartridge samples was not adequate due to a limited run time on the sampler. A problem was found with the drive motor for the sampling pump. The motor was replaced and the sampler was returned to normal operation.

05/17/03 TRM 523.1 4.7 miles Flooding in the area caused damage to the automatic surface water sampler at downstream this location. The sampler was replaced and sampling was conducted as scheduled for the next sampling period.

06/30/03 PM-3 7.5 miles SSE Air sampling volume for air filter and charcoal cartridge samples was not adequate due to limited run time on the sampler. A problem was found with the sampling pump. The pump was replaced and the sampler was returned to normal operation.

I

APPENDIX D ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES Appendix D Analytical Procedures Analyses of environmental samples are performed by the radioanalytical laboratory located at the L Western Area Radiological Laboratory facility in Muscle Shoals, Alabama. Analysis procedures are based on accepted methods. A summary of the analysis techniques and methodology follows.

L The gross beta measurements are made with an automatic low background counting system.

L Normal counting times are 50 minutes. Water samples are prepared by evaporating 500 ml of samples to near dryness, transferring to a stainless steel planchet, and completing the evaporation process. Air particulate filters are counted directly in a shallow planchet.

L The specific analysis of I-131 in milk is performed by first isolating and purifying the iodine by radiochemical separation and then counting the final precipitate on a beta-gamma coincidence counting system. The normal count time is 50 minutes. With the beta-gamma coincidence counting system, background counts are virtually eliminated and extremely low levels of activity can be L detected.

L After a radiochemical separation, samples analyzed for Sr-89, 90 are counted on a low background beta counting system. The sample is counted a second time after a 7-day ingrowth period. From the two counts the Sr-89 and Sr-90 concentrations can be determined.

L Water samples are analyzed for tritium content by first distilling a portion of the sample and then counting by liquid scintillation. A commercially available scintillation cocktail is used.

Gamma analyses are performed in various counting geometries depending on the sample type and volume. All gamma counts are obtained with germanium type detectors interfaced with a high L resolution gamma spectroscopy system. Spectral data reduction is performed by the computer program HYPERMET.

The charcoal cartridges used to sample gaseous radioiodine are analyzed by gamma spectroscopy using a high resolution gamma spectroscopy system with germanium detectors.

L Atmospheric moisture samples are collected on silica gel from a metered air flow. The moisture is released from the silica gel by heating and a portion of the distillate is counted by liquid scintillation L for tritium using commercially available scintillation cocktail.

W The necessary efficiency values, weight-efficiency curves, and geometry tables are established and maintained on each detector and counting system. A series of daily and periodic quality control L checks are performed to monitor counting instrumentation. System logbooks and control charts are I used to document the results of the quality control checks.

APPENDIX E NOMINAL LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION (LLD)

Appendix E

- Nominal Lower Limits of Detection A number of factors influence the LLD, including sample size, count time, counting efficiency, chemical processes, radioactive decay factors, and interfering isotopes encountered in the sample.

The most probable values for these factors have been evaluated for the various analyses performed in the environmental monitoring program. The nominal LLDs calculated from these values, in accordance with the methodology prescribed in the ODCM, are presented in Table E-l. The maximum values for the lower limits of detection specified in the ODCM are shown in Table E-2.

The nominal LLDs are also presented in the data tables. For analyses for which nominal LLDs have L not been established, an LLD of zero is assumed in determining if a measured activity is greater than the LLD.

(.r- r--- r-- r-- rev r -r [- r r - --C r - r---- r-.w r--" r-. . r r-- U7 TABLE E-1 Nominal LLD Values A. Radiochemical Procedures Sediment Air Filters Water Milk Wet Vegetation and Soil (pC/m 3) (pR90/ (yCi/L! (pCiIKe wet) (pCi/kdry)

Gross Beta 0.002 1.9 Tritium 3.0 300 Iodine-1 31 0.4 0.4 6.0 Strontiun-89 0.0011 5.0 3.5 31.0 1.6 en VI- Strontium-90 0.0004 2.0 2.0 12.0 0.4

-r.- r -r -r -- r- r I r-- r r r-- Fr- r-- E-Table E-1 Nominal LLD Values B. Gamma Analyses Foods Particulate Charcoal Water Vegetation Wet Soil and Tomatoes Filter Filter and Milk and Grain Vegetation Sediment Fish Clam Flesh Potatoes, etc.

pCi~/m3 nCi/m3 pCi/g. dr pCi/kg. wet pCi/g. dry pCi/g. drv pCi/R. dry pCi/kg. wet Ce-141 .005 .02 10 .07 35 .10 .07 .35 20 Ce-144 .01 .07 30 .15 115 .20 .15 .85 60 Cr-51 .02 0.15 45 .30 200 .35 .30 2.40 95 1-131 .005 0.03 10 .20 60 .25 .20 1.70 20 Ru-103 .005 0.02 5 .03 25 .03 .03 .25 25 Ru-106 .02 0.12 40 .15 190 .20 .15 1.25 90 Cs-134 .005 0.02 5 .03 30 .03 .03 .14 10 Cs-137 .005 0.02 5 .03 25 .03 .03 .15 10 Zr-95 .005 0.03 10 .05 45 .05 .05 .45 45 Nb-95 .005 0.02 .25 30 .04 .25 .25 10 LI 20 .03 .03 .25 10 Ln Co-58 .005 0.02 5 .03 Io Mn-54 .005 0.02 S .03 20 .03 .03 .20 10 Zn-65 .005 0.03 10 .05 45 .05 .05 .40 45 Co-60 .005 0.02 5 .03 20 .03 .03 .20 10 K-40 .04 0.30 100 .40 400 .75 .40 3.50 250 Ba-140 .015 0.07 25 .30 130 .30 .30 2.40 50 La-140 .01 0.04 10 .20 50 .20 .20 1.40 25 Fe-59 .005 0.04 10 .08 40 .05 .08 .45 25 Be-7 .02 0.15 45 .25 200 .25 .25 1.90 90 Pb-212 .005 0.03 15 .04 40 .10 .04 .30 40 Pb-214 .005 0.07 20 .50 80 .15 .50 .10 80 Bi-214 .005 0.05 20 .10 55 .15 .10 .50 40 Bi-212 .02 0.20 50 .25 250 .45 .25 2.00 130 TI-208 .002 0.02 10 .03 30 .06 .03 .25 30 Ra-224 .75 Ra-226 .15 Ac-228 .01 0.07 20 .10 70 .25 .10 .75 50

Table E-2 Maximum Values for the Lower Limits of Detection (LLD)

Specified by the WBN Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Airborne Particulate Food Water or Gases Fish Milk Products Sediment L Analvsis pCi/L vci/m3 gCi/kg. wet pOiL pCi/kl. wet pCilkg. dry gross beta 4 I x 10.2 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.

H-3 2000' N.A. NA. N.A. NA. N.A.

Mn-54 15 NA. 130 NA. NA. N.A.

Fe-59 30 N.A. 260 N.A. N.A. NA.

L. Co-58,60 15 N.A. 130 N.A. N.A. NA.

I Zn-65 30 N.A. 260 N.A. N.A. N.A.

L Zr-95 30 N.A. NA. N.A. NA. N.A.

i Nb-95 15 NA. NA. N.A. NA. N.A.

1-131 ib 7x10-2 NA. 1 60 N.A.

Cs-134 15 5 x10 2 130 15 60 150 Cs-137 18 6 x 10-2 150 . 18 80 180 Ba-140 60 N.A. N.A. 60 N.A. N.A.

La-140 15 N.A. N.A. 15 N.A. N.A.

a. If no drinking water pathway exists, a value of 3000 pCi/liter may be used.

b. If no drinking water pathway exists, a value of 15 pCi/liter may be used.

L L

.L L

L.

I L _PEDD L

U Appendix F Oualitv Assurance/Oualitv Control Program L A thorough quality assurance program is employed by the laboratory to ensure that the L environmental monitoring data are reliable. This program includes the use of written, approved procedures in performing the work, a complete training and qualification process, internal self L assessments of program performance, audits by various external organizations, and a laboratory quality control program.

The quality control program employed by the radioanalytical laboratory is designed to ensure that the sampling and analysis process is working as intended. The program includes equipment checks and the analysis of quality control samples along with routine samples.

Radiation detection devices can be tested in a number of ways. There are two primary tests L which are performed on all devices. In the first type, the device is operated without a sample on the detector to determine the background count rate. The background counts are usually low L values and are due to machine noise, cosmic rays, trace amounts of radioactivity in the materials used to construct the detector, or terrestrial sources. Charts of background counts are kept and monitored to ensure that no unusually high or low values are encountered.

L In the second test, the device is operated with a known amount of radioactivity present. The L number of counts registered from such a radioactive standard should be very reproducible. These reproducibility checks are also monitored to ensure that they are neither higher nor lower than expected. When counts from either test fall outside the expected range, the device is inspected for malfunction or contamination. It is not placed into service until it is operating properly.

In addition to these two general checks, other quality control checks are performed on the variety of detectors used in the laboratory. The exact nature of these checks depends on the type of device and the method it uses to detect radiation or store the information obtained.

l Quality control samples of a variety of types are used by the laboratory to verify the performance L of different portions of the analytical process. These quality control samples maybe blanks, replicate samples, blind samples, or cross-checks.

l Blanks are samples which contain no measurable radioactivity or no activity of the type being L measured. Such samples are analyzed to determine whether there is any contamination of equipment or commercial laboratory chemicals, cross-contamination in the chemical process, or L interference from isotopes other than the one being measured.

Duplicate samples are generated at random by the sample computer program which schedules the L collection of the routine samples. For example, if the routine program calls for four milk samples every week, on a random basis each farm might provide an additional sample several times a year. These duplicate samples are analyzed along with other routine samples. They provide information about the variability of radioactive content in the various sample media.

If enough sample is available for a particular analysis, the laboratory personnel can split it into L two portions. Such a sample can provide information about the variability of the analytical process since two identical portions of material are analyzed side by side.

Analytical knowns are another category of quality control sample. A known amount of L radioactivity is added to a sample medium. Whenever possible, the analytical knowns contain the same amount of radioactivity each time they are run. In this way, the lab staff has immediate L knowledge of the quality of the measurement process. A portion of these samples are also blanks.

L L. Blind spikes are samples containing radioactivity which are introduced into the analysis process disguised as ordinary environmental samples. The lab staff does not know the samples contain radioactivity. Since the bulk of the ordinary workload of the environmental laboratory contains no measurable activity or only naturally occurring radioisotopes, blind spikes L can be used to test the detection capability of the laboratory or they can be used to test the data review process. If an analysis routinely generates numerous zeroes for a particular isotope, the L presence of a positive result will be brought to the attention of the laboratory supervisor in the daily review process. Blind spikes test this process since they contain radioactivity at levels high enough to be detected. Furthermore, the activity can be put into such samples at the extreme limit of detection (near the LLD) to determine whether or not the laboratory can find any unusual L radioactivity whatsoever.

- At present, 5 percent of the laboratory workload is in the category of internal cross-checks.

L These samples have a known amount of radioactivity added and are presented to the lab staff labeled as cross-check samples. This means that the quality control staff knows the radioactive L content or "right answer" but the personnel performing the analyses do not. They are aware they are being tested. Such samples test the best performance of the laboratory by determining if the L staff can find the "right answer". These samples provide information about the accuracy of the measurement process. Further information is available about the variability of the process if L multiple analyses are requested on the same sample. Like blind spikes or analytical knowns, these samples can also be spiked with low levels of activity to test detection limits. During 2003, all analysis results for internal cross-check samples were within agreement limits when compared to the known value.

To provide for interlaboratory comparison program cross-check samples, the laboratory L participated in an environmental level cross-check program available through Analytics Incorporated. The results of TVA's participation in this program are presented in Table F-1.

TVA splits certain environmental samples with laboratories operated by the States of Alabama L and Tennessee and the EPA National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory in Montgomery, Alabama. When radioactivity has been present in the environment in measurable L quantities, such as following atmospheric nuclear weapons testing, following the Chernobyl incident, or as naturally occurring radionuclides, the split samples have provided TVA with yet L another level of information about laboratory performance. These samples demonstrate performance on actual environmental sample matrices rather than on the constructed matrices used in cross-check programs.

Quality control data are routinely collected, examined, and reported to laboratory supervisory L personnel. They are checked for trends, problem areas, or other indications that a portion of the analytical process needs correction or improvement. The end results is a measurement process L that provides reliable and verifiable data and is sensitive enough to measure the presence of radioactivity far below the levels which could be harmful to humans.

Table F-I Results For 2003 External Cross Checks Test Period SarMle Tvoe / Analysis Results 3 Signa Range Known TVA First Quarter Water (pCi/L)

Gross Beta 171 188 145 - 197 First Quarter Charcoal Filter (pCi/Filter) 1311 70 59 49 91 First Quarter Water (pCi/L) 1311 70 74 55 - 85 14'Ce 5 168 168 143 - 193 ICr 238 258 167 - 309

' 34 Cs 88 82 73 - 103 137cs 195 186 166 224 5sCO 42 46 27 - 57 54 Mn 63 66 48 - 78 59 Fe 46 52 31 - 61 6'Zn 90 93 63 - 117

'co 157 162 133 - 181 First Quarter Water (pCi/L) 114 110 97 - 131 90Sr 10 12 0 - 25 Third Quarter Water (pCi/L) 3H 8000 7659 5600 - 10400 Third Quarter Sand (pCi/g) 141ce 0.183 0.183 0.156 - 0.210 51 cr 0.496 0.462 0.347 - 0.645 134Cs 0.254 0.244 0.216 - 0.292

'37Cs 0.188 0.178 0.160 - 0.216 58Co 0.210 0.200 0.179 - 0.242 54Mn 0.198 0.216 0.168 - 0.228 59 Fe 0-.168 0.168 0.143 - 0.193 65Zn 0.374 0.403 0.262 - 0.486 60Co 0.263 0.270 0.224 - 0.302 Third Quarter Air Filter (pCi/Filter)

Gross Beta 173 143 147 199 Third Quarter Air Filter (pCi/Filter) 141ce 52 50 37 - 67 5

'Cr 141 126 99 - 183 72 59 57 - 87 137Cs 53 52 38 - 68 SICO 60 58 45 - 75 5Mn 56 61 41 - 71 59 Fe 48 46 33 - 63 605Zn 106 116 74 - 138 6 Co 75 78 60 - 90 L

L L

L L

L APPENDX G i LAND USE SURVEY L

L L

L L

L l

L

Appendix G Land Use Survey L A land use survey was conducted in accordance with the provisions of ODCM Control 1.3.2 to identify the location of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence, and the nearest garden of L greater than 500 square feet producing fresh leafy vegetables in each of 16 meteorological sectors within a distance of 5 miles from the plant.

L The land use survey was conducted between April 1 and October 1 using appropriate techniques such as door-to-door survey, mail survey, telephone survey, aerial survey, or information from local agricultural authorities or other reliable sources.

L l From the data of the surveys, relative radiation doses were projected for individuals near the plant. Doses from air submersion were calculated for the nearest resident in each sector, while doses from drinking milk or eating foods produced near the plant were calculated for the areas with milk producing animals and gardens, respectively. These doses were calculated using L design basis source terms and historical meteorological data. They also assume that the effluent releases are equivalent to the design basis source terms. The calculated doses are relative in nature and do not reflect actual exposures received by individuals living near WBN.

L In response to the 2003 WBN land use survey, annual doses were calculated for air submersion, vegetable ingestion, and milk ingestion. There were no changes in the location of the nearest resident in 2003.

Doses calculated for ingestion of home grown foods changed in seven sectors compared to the results calculated in 2002 due to changes in the locations of the nearest garden.

For milk ingestion, projected doses were consistent with those calculated for 2003. Except for the farm where the owner does not want to participate in the program (Farm Ho), milk samples are being collected from the three farms where the calculated doses are highest. One of the farms providing a milk sample is between Farm Ho and the plant.

The results of the 2003 land use survey and resulting relative projected annual dose calculations documented that there were no significant changes in land use of unrestricted areas. No required changes in the sampling locations for the radiological environmental monitoring program were L identified as result of the land use survey.

Tables G(-, G-2, and G-3 compare results of the relative projected annual dose calculations for 2002 and 2003.

Table G-I Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Relative Projected Annual Air Submersion Dose to the Nearest Residence Within 5 Miles of Plante nrem/year 2002 2003 Approximate Approximate Sector Distance (Miles) Annual Dose Distance (Miles) Annual Dose N 1.3 0.24 1.3 0.24 NNE 2.3 0.20 2.3 0.20 NE 2.1 0.19 2.1 0.19 ENE 1.5 0.31 1.5 0.31 E 2.0 0.18 2.0 0.18 ESE 2.8 0.12 2.8 0.12 SE 0.9 0.76 0.9 0.76 SSE 1.0 0.38 1.0 0.38 S 1.0 0.37 1.0 0.37 SSW 1.2 0.29 1.2 0.29 SW 2.7 0.09 2.7 0.09 WSW 1.3 0.38 1.3 0.38 W 1.8 0.07 1.8 0.07 WNS 1.0 0.17 1.0 0.17 NW 1.3 0.09 1.3 0.09 NNW 2.7 0.03 2.7 0.03

a. Assumes the effluent releases are equivalent to design basis source terms.

Table G-2 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Relative Projected Annual Ingestion Dose to Child's Bone Organ from Ingestion of Home-Grown Foods Nearest Garden Within 5 Miles of Plant nremlyear 2002 2003 Approximate Approximate Sector Distance (Miles) Annual Dose Distance (Miles) Annual Pose N 4.8 0.50 4.8 0.50 NNE 3.8 1.68 3.8 1.68 NE 2.4 3.36 2.4 3.36 ENE 3.0 1.98 3.0 1.98 E 5.0 0.83 3.4 1.63 ESE 3.0 2.25 3.0 1.57 SE 2.9 2.17 2.9 2.17 SSE 1.3 5.92 3.1 1.40 S 3.1 1.41 3.1 1.41 L SSW 1A 5.46 1.3 6.86 SW b 2.6 2.06 WSW 2.9 1.73 1.1 7.87 W 3.2 0.59 2.1 1.20 WNW 3.6 0.26 3.6 0.26 NW 2.0 0.76 1.3 1.97 NNW 2.9 0.02 2.9 0.62

__ a. Assumes the effluent releases are equivalent to design basis source terms.

b. Garden not identified within 5 miles of the plant in this sector.

Table G-3 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Relative Projected Annual Dose to Receptor Thyroid from Ingestion of Milk' (Nearest Milk-Producing Animal Within 5 Miles of Plant) mremlyear Approximate Distance Annual Dose X/Q Location Sector Miles 2002 2003 s/M 3

Cows Farm Mub ESE 3.7 0.08 0.08 1.14 E-6 FarmNb ESE 4.1 0.04 0.04 9.44 E-7 Farm L SSW 1.3 0.27 0.27 2.36 E-6 Farm Ho' SSW 1.5 0.33 0.33 1.43 E-6 1- a. Assumes the plant is operating and effluent releases are equivalent to design basis source terms.

b. Milk being sampled at these locations.

c. Owner unwilling to provide samples or information. The dose calculated assumes consumption of the milk by L an adult and a feeding factor equivalent to 33 percent If milk from this location were to be consumed by teens, children or infants, the estimated doses would be 0.52, 1.07 and 2.53 mremlyear, respectively.

APPENDIX H DATA TABLES AND FIGURES L

L i

L Table H - I DIRECT RADIATION LEVELS Average External Gamma Radiation Levels at Various Distances from Watts Bar Nuclear Plant for Each Quarter - 2003 mR / Quarter (a)

Distance per annum miles Average External Gamma Radiation Levels (b) mR / yr 1st qtr 2nd qtr 3rd qtr 4th qtr 0 -1 16.6ti2.0 13.8 +/- 2.2 14.6 +/- 2.0 18.3+/- 2.7 63 1-2 15.2*1.2 12.3+/-1.2 13.3+1.2 16.4+/-1.4 57 2-4 15.1+/-12 12.0+/-1.2 13.1+/-1.2 16.1*1.0 56 4-6 15.5+/-1.5 12A.414A 13.7t1.4 16.6+/-2.0 58

>6 14.6+/- 1.8 11.6 +/- 1.8 12.4 + 1.8 15.5 i 2.2 54 Average 0 - 2 miles 16.1 +/- 1.9 13.2 +/- 2.0 14.1 +/- 1.8 17.6i 2.5 61 (onsite)

Average

> 2 miles 15.1 1.6 12.1 +/- 1.5 13.2+/- 1.6 162+/- 2.0 57 (offsite)

(a) Field periods normalized to one standard quarter (2190 hours0.0253 days <br />0.608 hours <br />0.00362 weeks <br />8.33295e-4 months <br />)

(b) Average of the individual measurements in the set +/- 1 standard deviation of the set f _7 r-- (77 - r- wr r--- - - r7_ r-- F- (7 (7.r- r:- r-. rT- r--- Ir TABLE H - 2 DIRECT RADIATION LEVELS Individual Stations at Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Environmental Radiation Levels mR / quarter Map TLD Approx 1st Qtr . 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Annual Location Station Direction, Distance, Dec - Feb Mar - May Jun - Aug Sep - Nov Exposure Number Number degrees miles 2002 - 03 2003 2003 2003 mR/Year 40 N-1 10 1.2 17.2 14.4 14.9 18.3 64.8 41 N-2 350 4.7 16.7 13.0 14.8 17.7 62.2 42 NNE-1 21 1.2 16.4 13.1 14.7 18.1 62.3 10 NNE-1A 22 1.9 14.1 10.8 11.9 15.0 51.7 43 NNE-2 20 4.1 14.7 11.6 12.6 15.4 54.3 3 NNE-3 17 10.4 14.6 11.5 12.0 15.7 53.8 44 NE-1 39 .9 18.9 16.4 16.7 20.7 72.7 45 NE-2 54 2.9 16.3 13.5 14.0 17.1 60.8 46 NE-3 47 6.1 13.3 9.9 11.0 13.7 47.8 47 ENE-1 74 .7 17.2 14.8 15.7 19.3 66.9 48 ENE-2 69 5.8 14.7 12.0 12.4 16.1 55.4 74 ENE-2A 69 3.5 12.8 10.2 11.1 14.3 48.3 4 ENE-3 56 7.6 14.8 12.1 12.8 15.6 55.3 49 E-1 85 1.3 15.2 12.8 13.3 15.9 57.1 50 E-2 92 5.0 16.3 13.1 14.3 18.0 61.8 15 E-3 90 15.0 18.1 15.2 16.0 19.7 69.0 51 ESE-1 109 1.2 13.3 10.8 11.5 14.6 50.2 52 ESE-2 106 4.4 18.0 15.0 15.7 19.6 68.3 11 SE-1A 138 .9 14.8 12.1 13.6 16.4 57.0 54 SE-2 128 5.3 14.4 11.3 11.9 15.2 52.7 75 SE-2A 144 3.1 15.4 11.6 13.0 16.8 56.8 79 SSE-1 146 .6 15.9 13.3 14.1 18.6 61.8 55 SSE-1A 161 .6 14.0 10.9 12.4 14.2 51.5 56 SSE-2 156 5.8 16.5 13.6 14.2 18.1 62.4

r :r -- C- v- - r-. r-- - r- r- r- r7 r-, r7 TABLE H -2 continued DIRECT RADIATION LEVELS Individual Stations at Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Environmental Radiation Levels l mR I quarter Map TLD Approx 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Annual Location Station Direction, Distance, Dec - Feb Mar - May Jun - Aug Sep - Nov Exposure Number Number degrees miles 2002 - 03 2003 2003 2003 mR/year 57 S-1 182 .7 14.8 12.3 13.2 17.2 57.5 58 S-2 185 4.8 12.9 10.1 11.4 12.4 46.7 76 S-2A 177 2.0 16.2 13.5 14.7 16.7 61.1 5 S-3 185 6.2 13.2 10.5 11.5 12.9 48.0 59 SSW-1 199 .8 18.6 16.0 16.6 21.1 72.3 12 SSW-2 200 1.3 14.9 11.8 13.2 15.7 55.7 60 SSW-3 199 5.0 13.5 11.4 12.5 13.9 51.4 62 SW-1 226 .8 17.1 14.9 15.8 19.6 67.3 63 SW-2 220 5.3 14.8 12.2 13.5 14.9 55.4 6 SW-3 225 15.0 13.9 10.5 12.5 14.7 51.6 64 WSW-1 255 .9 14.5 11.5 12.9 15.7 54.7 65 WSW-2 247 4.0 16.1 13.3 15.4 18.6 63.4 66 W-1 270 .9 16.1 13.9 13.9 17.6 61.5 14 W-2 277 4.8 13.6 9.8 12.1 14.7 50.3 77 W-2A 268 3.2 15.4 12.5 14.0 16.8 58.6 67 WNW-1 294 .9 20.9 18.1 18.8 24.0 81.8 68 WNW-2 292 4.9 17.2 14.2 15.5 19.2 66.0 69 NW-1 320 1.1 15.3 12.6 13.5 17.3 58.6 70 NW-2 313 4.7 16.9 13.0 14.8 17.7 62.3 78 NW-2A 321 3.0 14.4 10.9 12.2 15.2 52.7 2 NW-3 317 7.0 17.4 14.0 14.8 19.0 65.2 71 NNW-1 340 1.0 (1) 11.3 12.1 15.5 51.7 72 NNW-2 333 4.5 16.1 12.5 14.0 17.3 59.9 73 NNW-3 329 7.0 12.9 9.5 9.9 13.7 46.0 7 NNW-4 337 15.0 13.6 11.2 11.4 14.7 51.0 note 1 Sum of available quarterly data normalized to 1year for the annual exposure value

r- rr-- U- r- r-- -r-- ru-- r--r- r r- r-r- r n r - X-r TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND INSTRUMENTATION WESTERN AREA RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY RADIOACTIVITY IN AIR FILTER PCI/M3 - 0.037 BQ/M3 NAME OF FACILITY: WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT DOCKET NO.: 50-390,391 LOCATION OF FACILITY: RHEA TENNESSEE REPORTING PERIOD: 2003 TYPE AND LOWER LIMIT ALL CONTROL NUMBER OF TOTAL NUMBER OF INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS NONROUTINE OF ANALYSIS DETECTION MEAN (F) NAME MEAN (F) MEAN (F) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD) RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 GROSS BETA 518 2.OOE-03 1.94E-02( 415/ 415) PM2 SPRING CITY 2.02E-02( 52/ 52) 1.94E-02( 103/ 103) 9.13E 3.79E-02 7.0 MILES NW 1.03E 3.79E-02 9.42E 3.52E-02 GAMMA SCAN (GELI) H 130 9 BE-7 2.OOE-02 8.36E-02( 104/ 104) LM3 8.63E-02 ( 13/ 13) 8.76E-02( 26/ 26) t" til 0 5.24E 1.17E-01 1.9 MILES NNE 6.70E 1.17E-01 6.70E 1.13E-01 BI-214 S.OOE-03 1.22E-02( 68/ 104) PM5 DECATUR 1.49E-02( 8/ 13) 1.19E-02 ( 14/ 26) w 5.10E 3.49E-02 6.2 MILES S 5.40E 3.49E-02 7.OOE 2.46E-02 wI K-40 4.OOE-02 2.43E-01( 1/ 104) PM4 2.43E-01( 1/ 13) 26 VALUES c LLD 2.43E 2.43E-01 7.6 MILES NE/IEENE 2.43E 2.43E-01 PB-214 5.00E-03 1.17E-02( 64/ 104) LM3 1.41E-02( 7/ 13) 1.22E-02( 14/ 26) 5.10E 2.85E-02 1.9 MILES NNE 6.10E 2.72E-02 7.OOE 2.58E-02 TL-208 2.OOE-03 3.OOE-03( 1/ 104) PM4 3.00E-03( 1/ 13) 26 VALUES *c LLD 3.OOE 3.OOE-03 7.6 MILES NE/EENE 3.OOE 3.00E-03 NOTE: 1. NOMINAL LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) AS DESCRIBED IN TABLE E-1 .

NOTE: 2. MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY. FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F).

t _ r7 , r _ r _ w_ F- [- r -F F-- r- F_

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND INSTRUMENTATION WESTERN AREA RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY RADIOACTIVITY IN CHARCOAL FILTER PCI/M3 - 0.037 BQ/M3 NAME OF FACILITY: WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT DOCKET NO.: 50-390,391 LOCATION OF FACILITY: RHEA TENNESSEE REPORTING PERIOD: 2003 TYPE AND LOWER LIMIT ALL CONTROL NUMBER OF TOTAL NUMBER OF INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS NONROUTINE OF ANALYSIS DETECTION MEAN (F) NAME MEAN (F) MEAN (F) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD) RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 GAMMA SCAN (GELI) 518 BI-214 5.00E-02 8.33E-02( 22/ 415) LM1 1.14E-01( 3/ 52) 9.43E-02( S/ 103) 5.00E 1.59E-01 0.5 MILES SSW 7.31E 1.51E-01 5.05E 1.55E-01 1-131 3.OOE-02 SEE NOTE 3 H K-40 3.OOE-01 3.59E-01( 24/ 415) PM2 SPRING CITY 4.35E-01( 4/ 52) 3.54E-01 ( 7/ 103) 9 I 3.04E 5.18E-01 7.0 MILES NW 3.438 5.188-01 3.14E 4.52E-01 t-I li M I.- PB-214 7.OOE-02 1.12E-01( 14/ 415) LM1 1.S5E-01( 2/ 52) 1.14E-01( 6/ 103)

I 7.11E 1.63E-01 0.5 MILES SSW 1.478 1.63E-01 7.32E 1.43E-01 w 41I NOTE: 1. NOMINAL LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) AS DESCRIBED IN TABLE E-1 .

NOTE: 2. MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY. FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F).

NOTE: 3. THE ANALYSIS OF CHARCOAL FILTERS WAS PERFORMED BY GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY. NO 1-131 WAS DETECTED.

THE LLD FOR 1-131 BY GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY WAS 0.03 pCi/Cubic meter.

I- 7 r-l r- w-- r- r- r- r- r- n F - r- r- r- r- r-- r-TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND INSTRUMENTATION WESTERN AREA RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY RADIOACTIVITY IN ATMOSPHERIC MOISTURE PCI/M3 - 0.037 BQ/M3 NAME OF FACILITY: WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT DOCKET NO.: 50-390,391 LOCATION OF FACILITY: RHEA TENNESSEE REPORTING PERIOD: 2003 TYPE AND LOWER LIMIT ALL CONTROL NUMBER OF TOTAL NUMBER OF INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS NONROUTINE OF ANALYSIS DETECTION MEAN (F) NAME MEAN (F) MEAN (F) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD) RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 TRITIUM 208 3.00 156 VALUES < LLD 52 VALUES c LLD NOTE: 1. NOMINAL LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) AS DESCRIBED IN TABLE H-1 .

NOTE: 2. MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY. FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED til tl3 LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F).

U'

[ r77 r r-- r- 1 r r ul - - r-7 r r - r-- r- r- r- rub r.w TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND INSTRUMENTATION WESTERN AREA RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY RADIOACTIVITY IN MILK PCI/L - 0.037 BQ/L NAME OF FACILITY: WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT DOCKET NO.: 50-390,391 LOCATION OF FACILITY: RHEA TENNESSEE REPORTING PERIOD: 2003 TYPE AND LOWER LIMIT ALL CONTROL NUMBER OF TOTAL NUMBER OF INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS NONROUTINE OF ANALYSIS DETECTION MEAN (F) NAME MEAN (F) MEAN (F) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD) RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 IODINE-131 128 4.OOE-01 78 VALUES c LLD 50 VALUES c LLD GAMMA SCAN (GELI) 128 AC-228 2.OOE+01 3.27E+01 ( 2/ 78) LAYMAN FARM 4. 07E+01( 1/ 26) 50 VALUES < LLD 2.46E+01- 4.071+01 1.3 MILES SSW 4.07E+01- 4.07E+01 BI-212 S.00E+01 6.78E+01 ( 1/ 78) LAYMAN FARM 6.78E+01( 1/ 26) 50 VALUES < LLD mL-6.789+01- 6.78E+01 1.3 MILES SSW 6.78E+01- 6.78E+01 BI-214 2.OOE+01 3.84E+01( 5/ 78) LAYMAN FARM 5.67E+01( 2/ 26) 2.58E+01( 5/ 50) aI 2.OOE+01- 9.33E+61 1.3 MILES SSW 2.OOE+01- 9.33E+01 2.19E+01- 3.61E+01 K-40 1.00E+02 1.388+03( 78/ 78) LAYMAN FARM 1.39E+03( 26/ 26) 1.37E+03( 50/ 50) 7.01E+02- 1. 57E+03 1.3 MILES SSW 7. 01E+02- 1.57R+03 1.16E+03- 1.711+03 PB-212 1. 50E+01 2.54E+01( 1/ 78) LAYMAN FARM 2.54E+01( 1/ 26) 50 VALUES < LLD 2.54E+01- 2.54E+01 1.3 MILES SSW 2.54E+01- 2.54E+01 PB-214 2. OOE+01 5.32E+01( 2/ 78) LAYMAN FARM 8.34E+01( 1/ 26) 2.1SE+01( 2/ 50) 2.311+01- 8.34E+01 1.3 MILES SSW 8.34E+01- 8. 34E+01 2.03E+01- 2.27E+01 TL-208 1. 00E+01 1.OOE+01( 1/ 78) LAYMAN FARM 1.OOE+01( 1/ 26) 50 VALUES c LLD 1.009+01- 1. 00E+01 1.3 MILES SSW 1.00E+01- 1.OOE+01 SR 89 20 3.50E+00 12 VALUES < LLD 8 VALUES - LLD SR 90 20 2.OOE+00 12 VALUES < LLD 8 VALUES - LLD NOTE: 1. NOMINAL LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) AS DESCRIBED IN TABLE E-1 NOTE: 2. MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY. FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F).

I- r- r-7 r> r-  :--- r-- r r- r--- r T r- r- v(- r..

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND INSTRUMENTATION WESTERN AREA RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY RADIOACTIVITY IN SOIL PCI/GM - 0.037 BQ/G (DRY WEIGHT)

NAME OF FACILITY: WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT DOCKET NO.: 50-390,391 LOCATION OF FACILITY: RHEA TENNESSEE REPORTING PERIOD: 2003 TYPE AND LOWER LIMIT ALL CONTROL NUMBER OF TOTAL NUMBER OF INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS NONROUTINE OF ANALYSIS DETECTION MEAN (F) NAME MEAN (F) MEAN (F) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD) RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 GAMMA SCAN (GELI) 10 AC-228 2.50E-01 1. 13E+00( 8/ 8) LM-4 WB 1.46E+00( 1/ 1) 7.20E-01( 2/ 2) 8.84E 1.46E.00 0.9 MILES SE 1.46E+00- 1.461+00 5.57E 8.83E-01 BE-7 2.50E-01 3.72E-01( 1/ 8) LM2 3.72E-01( 1/ 1) 2 VALUES c LLD 3.72E 3.72E-01 0.5 MILES N 3.728 3.72E-01 1 BI-212 4.50E-01 1. OSE+00 ( S/ 8) PMS DECATUR 1.30E+00( 1/ 1) 7.38E-01( 2/ 2) IliI 14 5.26E 9.50E-01 4- 8.35E 1.30R+00 6.2 MILES S 1.30E+00- 1.30E+00 I BI-214 1.50E-01 8.02E-01( 8/ 8) LM3 9.70E-01( 1/ 1) 6.95E-01( 2/ 2) 5.81E 9.708-01 1.9 MILES NNE 9.70E 9.70E-01 6.04E 7.85E-01 CS-137 3.00E-02 1.75E-01( 8/ 8) PM2 SPRING CITY 4.72E-01( 1/ 1) 3.68E-01( 2/ 2) 3.84E 4.721-01 7.0 MILES NW 4.72E 4.72E-01 1.64E 5.71E-01 K-40 7.50E-01 1.18E+01( 8/ 8) LM-4 WB 2.68E+01( 1/ 1) 5.21E+00( 2/ 2)

3. 56E+00- 2.68E+01 0.9 MILES SE 2.68E+01- 2.68E+01 5.091+00- 5.33E+00 PB-212 1.00E-01 1.02E+00( 8/ 8) LM-4 WE 1.26E+00( 1/ 1) 7.24E-01( 2/ 2) 7.64E 1.26E+00 0.9 MILES SE 1.26E+00- 1.26E+00 5.67E 8.80E-01 PB-214 1.50E-01 8.97E-01( 8/ 8) LM3 1.148+00( 1/ 1) 7.77E-01( 2/ 2) 6.73E 1.14E+00 1.9 MILES NNE 1.14E+00- 1.14E+00 6.80E 8.75E-01 RA-224 7.50E-01 1.268+00( 7/ 8) PM5 DECATUR 1. 70E+00( 1/ 1) 2 VALUES < LLD 8.76E 1.70E+00 6.2 MILES S 1.70E+00- 1. 70E+00 RA-226 1.50E-01 8. 02E-01( 8/ 8) LM3 9.70E-01( 1/ 1) 6.95E-01( 2/ 2) 5.81E 9.70E-01 1.9 MILES NNE 9.70E 9.70E-01 6.04E 7.85E-01 TL-208 6.008-02 3.24E-01( 8/ 8) LM-4 WB 4.00E-01( 1/ 1) 2.36E-01( 2/ 2) 2.56E 4.00E-01 0.9 MILES SE 4.00E 4.00E-01 1.80E 2.92E-01 SR 89 10 1.60E+00 8 VALUES < LLD 2 VALUES c LLD SR 90 10 4.00E-01 8 VALUES < LLD 2 VALUES < LLD NOTE: 1. NOMINAL LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) AS DESCRIBED IN TABLE E-1 .

NOTE: 2. MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY. FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F).

r-- r-- r ra r r- row ro r=- r- X7 r. r~ - r7 r-- r- -rT TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND INSTRUMENTATION WESTERN AREA RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY RADIOACTIVITY IN APPLES PCI/KG - 0.037 BQ/KG (WET NT)

NAME OF FACILITY: WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT DOCKET NO.: 50-390,391 LOCATION OF FACILITY: RHEA TENNESSEE REPORTING PERIOD: 2003 TYPE AND LOWER LIMIT ALL CONTROL NUMBER OF TOTAL NUMBER OF INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS NONROUTINE OF ANALYSIS DETECTION MEAN (F) NAME MEAN (F) MEAN (F) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD) RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTS 2 GAMMA SCAN (GELI) 2 K-40 2.50E+02 9.98E+02( 1/ 1) 4.5 MILES N 9.98E+02( 1/ 1) 8.87E+02( 1/ 1) 9.98E+02- 9.98E+02 9.98E+02- 9.98E+02 8.87E+02- 8.87E+02 I NOTE: 1. NOMINAL LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) AS DESCRIBED IN TABLE E-1 . t-4 LA NOTE: 2. MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY. FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED tzi I LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F). w IAl

-r-f t-. r- r- r- r_ r f r- r- r- r- r:-- r- r- r- VT- r"- r-TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND INSTRUMENTATION WESTERN AREA RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY RADIOACTIVITY IN CABBAGE PCI/KG - 0.037 BQ/KG (WET WT)

NAME OF FACILITY: WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT DOCKET NCO.: 50-390,391 LOCATION OF FACILITY: RHEA TENNESSEE REPORTING G PERIOD: 2003 TYPE AND LOWER LIMIT ALL CONTROL NUMBER OF TOTAL NUMBER OF INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS NONROUTINE OF ANALYSIS DETECTION MEAN (F) NAME MEAN (F) MEAN (F) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD) RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 GAMMA SCAN (GELI) 2 K-40 2.50E+02 1.30E+03( 1/ 1) WBNP 1.30E+03( 1/ 1) 1.27E+03( 1/ 1) 1.30E+03- 1.30E+03 3.5 MILES NNE) 1.30E+03- 1.30E+03 1.27E+03- 1.27E+03 NOTE: 1. NOMINAL LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) AS DESCRIBED IN TABLE E-1 .

NOTE: 2. MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY. FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED Ir LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F). so-

'0I

(V7- Fri (7- U r t- (7 r- r lr r- (- r-I- r-- V- r- rt. r-, r-TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND INSTRUMENTATION WESTERN AREA RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY RADIOACTIVITY IN CORN PCI/KG - 0.037 BQ/KG (WET NT)

NAME OF FACILITY: WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT DOCKET NO.: 50-390,391 LOCATION OF FACILITY: RHEA TENNESSEE REPORTING PERIOD: 2003 TYPE AND LOWER LIMIT ALL CONTROL NUMBER OF TOTAL NUMBER OF INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS NONROUTINE OF ANALYSIS DETECTION MEAN (F) NAME MEAN (F) MEAN (F) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD) RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 GAMMA SCAN (GELI) 2 K-40 2.50E+02 1.92E+03( 1/ 1) NORTON FARM 1.92E+03( 1/ 1) 2.30E+03( 1/ 1) 1.92E+03- 1.92E+03 4.1 MILES ESE 1.92E+03- 1.923+03 2.30E+03- 2.303+03 NOTE: 1. NOMINAL LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) AS-DESCRIBED IN TABLE E-1 .

NOTE: 2. MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY. FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F).

I-0-

fr r' t---

- or7 - t7 r_- 7- r- -Ir' t - r- r- r r7-TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND INSTRUMENTATION WESTERN AREA RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY RADIOACTIVITY IN GREEN BEANS PCI/KG - 0.037 BQ/KG (WET WT)

NAME OF FACILITY: WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT DOCKET NO.: 50-390,391 LOCATION OF FACILITY: RHEA TENNESSEE REPORTING PERIOD: 2003 TYPE AND LOWER LIMIT ALL CONTROL NUMBER OF TOTAL NUMBER OF INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS NONROUTINE OF ANALYSIS DETECTION MEAN (F) NAME MEAN (F) MEAN (F) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD) RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 GAMMA SCAN (GELI) 2 BI-214 4.OOE+01 1 VALUES c LLD WBNP 1 VALUES c LLD 4.23E+01( 1/ 1) 3.5 MILES NW 4.23E+01- 4.23E+01 K-40 2.50E+02 1.39E+03( 1/ 1) WBNP 1.393+03( I/ 1) 1. 56E+03( 1/ 1) 1.39E+03- 1.39E+03 3.5 MILES NW 1.39E+03- 1.39E+03 1.56E+03- 1.56E+03

-I sI 0,

NOTE: 1. NOMINAL LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) AS DESCRIBED IN TABLE E-1 .

NOTE: 2. MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY. FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F).

r l- U-C - U" tC-- t- r- r- f-, r' r- r - n- iU-- rn I TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND INSTRUMENTATION WESTERN AREA RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY RADIOACTIVITY IN TOMATOES PCI/KG - 0.037 BQ/KG (WET WT)

NAME OF FACILITY: WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT DOCKET NO.: 50-390,391 LOCATION OF FACILITY: RHEA TENNESSEE REPORTING PERIOD: 2003 TYPE AND LOWER LIMIT ALL CONTROL NUMBER OF TOTAL NUMBER OF INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS NONROUTINE OF ANALYSIS DETECTION MEAN (F) NAME MEAN (F) MEAN (F) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD) RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 GAMMA SCAN (GELI) 2 K-40 2.50E+02 1.59E+03( 1/ 1) WBNP 1.59E+03( 1/ 1) 1.77E+03( 1/ 1) 1.59E+03- 1.59E+03 3.5 MILES NW 1.59E+03- 1.59E+03 1.77E+03- 1.77E+03

-Iq NOTE: 1. NOMINAL LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) AS DESCRIBED IN TABLE E-1 .

%0 NOTE: 2. MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY. FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F).

I.-

(

Ut (7 f W.- (77 #37 ( 'C- m-- r- .c - t- r__ t--r r- A TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND INSTRUMENTATION WESTERN AREA RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY RADIOACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER(Total)

PCI/L - 0.037 BQ/L NAME OF FACILITY: WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT DOCKET NO.: 50-390,391 LOCATION OF FACILITY: RHEA TENNESSEE REPORTING PERIOD: 2003 TYPE AND LOWER LIMIT ALL CONTROL NUMBER OF TOTAL NUMBER OF INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS NONROUTINE

• OF ANALYSIS DETECTION MEAN (F) NAME MEAN (F) MEAN (F) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD) RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 GROSS BETA 38 1.903+00 3.63E+00( 21/ 25) TRM 523.1 4.168+00( 11/ 12) 2.67E+00( 10/ 13) 2.09E+00- 8.43E+00 2.369+00- 8.43E+00 1.923+00- 3.52E+00 GAMMA SCAN (GELI) 38 BI-214 2.OOE+01 2.723+01( 3/ 25) TRM 523.1 3.313+01( 1/ 12) 2.33E+01( 2/ 13) 00 2.27E+01- 3.31E+01 3.31E+01- 3.31E+01 2.13E+01- 2.53E+01 r PB-214 2.OOE+01 2.50E+01( 1/ 25) TRM 517.9 2.50E+01( 1/ 13) 2.27E+01( 1/ 13) w' 2.50E+01- 2.50E+01 2.50E+01- 2.50E+01 2.27E+01- 2.27E+01 TRITIUM 50 3.00E+02 33 VALUES c LLD 17 VALUES c LLD NOTE: 1. NOMINAL LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) AS DESCRIBED IN TABLE E-1 .

NOTE: 2. MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY. FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F).

f.-Y r- (7 '-

F C- t-- 17t -V r- r--- r- r -- C- r--- tr - t-- F?-

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND INSTRUMENTATION WESTERN AREA RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY RADIOACTIVITY IN PUBLIC WATER(Total)

PCI/L - 0.037 BQ/L NAME OF FACILITY: WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT DOCKET NO.: 50-390,391 LOCATION OF FACILITY: RHEA TENNESSEE REPORTING PERIOD: 2003 TYPE AND LOWER LIMIT ALL CONTROL NUMBER OF TOTAL NUMBER OF INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS NONROUTINE OF ANALYSIS DETECTION MEAN (P) NAME MEAN (F) MEAN (F) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD) RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 GROSS BETA 39 1.90E+00 2.70E+00( 19/ 26) CF INDUSTRIES 2.71E+00( 10/ 13) 2.67E+00( 10/ 13) 1.91E+00- 3.55E+00 TRM 473.0 2.06E+00- 3.SSE+00 1.92E+00- 3.52E+00 GAMMA SCAN (GELI) 39 IO BI-214 2.OOE+01 3.59E+01( 1/ 26) CF INDUSTRIES 3.59E+01( 1/ 13) 2.33E+01 ( 2/ 13) 00 3.59E+01- 3.59E+01 TRM 473.0 3.59E+01- 3.59E+01 2.13E+01- 2.53E+01 PB-214 2.OOE+01 2.99E+01( 1/ 26) CF INDUSTRIES 2.99E+01( 1/ 13) 2.27B+01( 1/ 13) I-I 2.99E+01- 2.99E+01 TRM 473.0 2.99E+01- 2.991+01 2.27E+01- 2.271+01 TRITIUM 51 3.00E+02 34 VALUES < LLD 17 VALUES < LLD NOTE: 1. NOMINAL LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) AS DESCRIBED IN TABLE E-1 .

NOTE: 2. MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY. FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F).

(-- ri (t- r- h- to r7 1.-- r C- V- ra t-r- to7 r-TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND INSTRUMENTATION WESTERN AREA RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY RADIOACTIVITY IN WELL WATER(Total)

PCI/L - 0.037 BQ/L NAME OF FACILITY: WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT DOCKET NO.: 50-390,391 LOCATION OF FACILITY: RHEA TENNESSEE REPORTING PERIOD: 2003 TYPE AND LOWER LIMIT ALL CONTROL NUMBER OF TOTAL NUMBER OF INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS NONROUTINE OF ANALYSIS DETECTION MEAN (F) NAME MEAN (F) MEAN (F) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD) RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 GROSS BETA 63 1.90E+00 5.55E+00( 40/ 45) WBN MW-B 8.21E+00( 9/ 9) 2.45E+00( 10/ 18) 1.90E+00- 1.17E+01 0.45 MILES SSE) 4.11E+00- 1.17E+01 1.90E+00- 3.45E+00 GAMMA SCAN (GELI) 67

• I 00 BI-214 2.OOE+01 2.96E+01( 4/ 49) WBN MW-D 3.50E+01( 1/ 10) 1.33E+02( 8/ 18)

I 2.72E+01- 3. SOE+01 0.40 MILES SSE) 3.SOE+01- 3.50E+01 2.44E+01- 2.72E+02 PB-214 2.00E+01 2.49E+01( 4/ 49) WIEN MW-B 2. 65E+01 ( 1/ 10) 1.54E+02( 7/ 18) 2.17E+01- 2.68E+01 0.45 MILES SSE) 2.65E+01- 2.65E+01 6.78E+01- 2.95E+02 TRITIUM Ln 90 3.OOE+02 8.90E+03( 47/ 64) WEN MW-8 1.41E+04( 13/ 13) 26 VALUES c LLD 3.36E+02- 2.49E+04 0.45 MILES SSE) 1.16E+04- 1.90E+04 NOTE: 1. NOMINAL LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) AS DESCRIBED IN TABLE E-1 .

NOTE: 2. MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY. FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F).

at C- -V r_- r--. t--- am Or--

O--

- r - i - As- 177 r f7 r TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND INSTRUMENTATION WESTERN AREA RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY RADIOACTIVITY IN COMMERCIAL FISH PCI/GM - 0.037 BQ/G (DRY WEIGHT)

NAME OF FACILITY: WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT DOCKET NO.: 50-390,391 LOCATION OF FACILITY: RHEA TENNESSEE REPORTING PERIOD: 2003 TYPE AND LOWER LIMIT ALL CONTROL NUMBER OF TOTAL NUMBER OF INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS NONROUTINE OF ANALYSIS DETECTION MEAN (F) NAME MEAN (F) MEAN (F) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD) RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 GAMMA SCAN (GELI) 6 9I-214 1.00E-01 l.59E-01( 3/ 4) CHICKAMAUGA RES 1. 82E-01 ( 2/ 2) 1. 94E-01 ( 2/ 2) 1.12E 2.08E-01 TRM 471-530 1.56E 2.08E-01 1.14E 2.75E-01 CS-137 3.OOE-02 4.17E-02( 1/ 4) DOWNSTREAM STATION 1 4.17E-02( 1/ 2) 6.76E-02( 2/ 2) H 4.17E 4.17E-02 DOWNSTREAM 4.17E 4.173-02 6.43E 7.103-02 I K-40 4.00E-01 1.06Z+01( 4/ 4) DOWNSTREAM STATION 1 1.07E+01( 2/ 2) 1.24E+01( 2/ 2) 00 w 1.00E+01- 1. 10E+01 DOWNSTREAM 1.04E+01- 1.103+01 1.088+01- 1.40E+01 I P:

NOTE: 1. NOMINAL LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) AS DESCRIBED IN TABLE E-1 . Is NOTE: 2. MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY. FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F).

r:- f- V-- r-. ur- r- r_ t r- r- r rC-TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND INSTRUMENTATION WESTERN AREA RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY RADIOACTIVITY IN GAME FISH PCI/GM - 0.037 BQ/G (DRY WEIGHT)

NAME OF FACILITY: WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT DOCKET NO.: 50-390,391 LOCATION OF FACILITY: RHEA TENNESSEE REPORTING PERIOD: 2003 TYPE AND LOWER LIMIT ALL CONTROL NUMBER OF TOTAL NUMBER OF INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS NONROUTINE OF ANALYSIS DETECTION MEAN (F) NAME MEAN (F) MEAN (F) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD) RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 GAMMA SCAN (GELI) 6 BI-214 1.00E-01 1.60E-01( 4/ 4) DOWNSTREAM STATION 1 2/

2.01E-01( 2) 2 VALUES c LLD 1.01E 2.22E-01 DOWNSTREAM 1.80E 2.22E-01 CS-137 3.OOE-02 4.22E-02( 3/ 4) CHICKAMAUGA RES 4.42E-02( 1/ 2) 5.96E-02( 2/ 2) 3.24E 4.99E-02 TRM 471-530 4.42E 4.42E-02 5.393 6.538-02 00 K-40 4.OOE-01 1.32E+01( 4/ 4) CHICKAMAUGA RES 1. 37E+01 ( 2/ 2) 1.48E+01( 2/ 2) H:

1.28E+01- 1.43E+01 TRM 471-530 1.30E+01- 1.43E+01 1.42E+01- 1.553+01 NOTE: 1. NOMINAL LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) AS DESCRIBED IN TABLE E-1 .

NOTE: 2. MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY. "

FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (k).

r

'r r r-Ir r- t- r- tI r r--- U- t- v-r r- r-- lr-- r ,

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND INSTRUMENTATION WESTERN AREA RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY RADIOACTIVITY IN SHORELINE SEDIMENT PCI/GM - 0.037 BQ/G (DRY WEIGHT)

NAME OF FACILITY: WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT DOCKET NO.: 50-390,391 LOCATION OF FACILITY: RHEA TENNESSEE REPORTING PERIOD: 2003 TYPE AND LOWER LIMIT ALL CONTROL NUMBER O0 TOTAL NUMBER OF INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS NONROUTINE DETECTION MEAN (F) NAME MEAN (P) MEAN (F) REPORTED OF ANALYSIS MEASUREMENTS PERFORMED (LLD) RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 GAMMA SCAN (GELI) 4 AC-228 2. 50E-01 1.41E+00( 2/ 2) COTTON PORT MARINA 1. 41E+00 ( 2/ 2) 2 VALUES c LLD 1.39E+00- 1.43E+00 TRM 513 1.39E+00- 1.43E+00 1/ 2) 2 VALUES c LLD B8E-7 BI-212 2.50E-01 4.SOE-01 2.64E-01 (

2.64E 1.41E+00(

I/

2.64E-01 2/

2) COTTON PORT TRM 513

2) COTTON PORT MARINA MARINA 2.64E-01(

2.64E 1.41E+00(

2.64E-01 2/ 2) 2 VALUES c LLD 5

L-1 tzj I 1.37E+00- 1.46E+00 TRM 513 1.37E+00- 1.46E+00 BI-214 1.SOE-01 5.94E-01( 2/ 2) COTTON PORT MARINA 5.94E-01( 2/ 2) 1.52E-01( 1/ 2) 6.84E-01 1.52E 1.52E-01 IF 5.05E 6.84E-01 TRM 513 5.05E 3.OOE-02 9.28E-02( 1/ 2) COTTON PORT MARINA 9.28E-02 ( 1/ 2) 2 VALUES c LLD 00 CS-137 9.28E 9.28E-02 TRM 513 9.28E 9.28E-02 K-40 7.50E-01 3. 10E+01( 2/ 2).COTTON PORT MARINA 3. 10E+01( 2/ 2) 2 VALUES c LLD 3.10E+01- 3.11E+01 TRM 513 3.10E+01- 3.11E+01 PB-212 1.00E-01 1.352+00( 2/ 2) COTTON PORT MARINA 1. 35E+00( 2/ 2) 1.46E-01( 1/ 2) 1.32E+00- 1.37E+00 TRM 513 1.32E+00- 1. 37E+00 1.46E 1.46E-01 1.50E-01 6.56E-01( 2/ 2) COTTON PORT MARINA 6.56E-01( 2/ 2) 1.55E-01( 1/ 2)

PB-214 5.45E 7.66E-01 TRM 513 5.45E 7.66E-01 1.55E 1.55E-01 RA-226 1.50E-0l 5.94E-01( 2/ 2) COTTON PORT MARINA 5. 94E-01 ( 2/ 2) 1.52E-01( 1/ 2) 5.05E 6.84E-01 TRM 513 5.05E 6.84E-01 1.52E 1. 52E-01 TL-208 6.00R-02 4.16E-01( 2/ 2) COTTON PORT MARINA 4.16E-01( 2/ 2) 2 VALUES c LLD 4.09E 4.23E-01 TRM 513 4.09E 4.23Z-01 NOTE: 1. NOMINAL LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) AS DESCRIBED IN TABLE E-1 .

NOTE: 2. MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY. FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F).

t- l- r-~ r-: r ( t- r- r-- r- r- r -, r-,- t-- (---- r- r-TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND INSTRUMENTATION WESTERN AREA RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY RADIOACTIVITY IN POND SEDIMENT PCI/GM - 0.037 BQ/G (DRY WEIGHT)

NAME OF FACILITY: WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT DOCKET NO.: 50-390,391 LOCATION OF FACILITY: RHEA TENNESSEE REPORTING PERIOD: 2003 LOWER LIMIT ALL CONTROL NUMBER OF TYPE AND OF INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS NONROUTINE TOTAL NUMBER DETECTION MEAN (F) NAME MEAN (F) MEAN (F) REPORTED OF ANALYSIS (LLD) RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS PERFORMED SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 GAMMA SCAN (GELI)

S AC-228 2.50E-01 9.87E-01 ( 5/ 5) LV-3 1. 36E+00( 1/ 1) 0 VALUES c LLD 8.49E 1.36E+00 LOW VOL WASTE POND 1.36B+00- 1. 36E+00 81-212 4.50Z-01 1.12E+00( 5/ 5) LV-3 1.633+00 1/ 1) 0 VALUES c LLD 8.27E 1.63E+00 LOW VOL WASTE POND 1.63E+00- 1.63E+00

1. 483+00 ( 1/ 1) 0 VALUES c LLD P:

BI-214 1.50B-01 8.22E-01( 5/ 5) LV-3 I 5.99E-oi- 1.48E+00 LOW VOL WASTE POND 1.48E+00- 1.48E+00 0 3.00E-02 1.09E-01( 2/ 5) YP-16 1.60E-01( 1/ 1) 0 VALUES LLD CO-58 5.80E 1.60E-01 YARD POND 1.603 1.60B-01 3.00E-02 4.18E-02( 3/ 5) YP-16 4.73E-02( 1/ 1) 0 VALUES c LLD CO-60 3.87E 4.73E-02 YARD POND 4.738 4.73E-02 CS-137 3.OOE-02 6.32E-02 ( 5/ 5) LV-3 1.12E-01( 1/ 1) 0 VALUES c LLD 3.33E 1.12E-01 LOW VOL WASTE POND 1.123 1.12E-01 K-40 7.50E-01 1.09E+01( 5/ 5) LV-3 1.43E+01( 1/ 1) 0 VALUES c LLD 8.40E+00- 1.433+01 LOW VOL WASTE POND 1.43E+01- 1.43E+01 PB-212 1.00E-01 9.74E-01( 5/ 5) LV-3 1. 26E+00 ( 1/ 1) 0 VALUES c LLD 8.52E 1.263+00 LOW VOL WASTE POND 1.26E+00- 1.26E+00 PB-214 1.50E-01 9.27E-01 ( 5/ 5) LV-3 1.54E+00( 1/ 1) 0 VALUES LLD 6.98E 1.548+00 LOW VOL WASTE POND 1.543+00- 1.54E+00 RA-224 7.50E-01 9.28E-01( 3/ 5) YP-13 1.03E+00( 1/ 1) 0 VALUES c LW 7.67E 1. 03E+00 YARD POND 1.033+00- 1. 03E+00 SB-125 NOT ESTAB 4.54E-02( 1/ 5) YP-16 4.54E-02( 1/ 1) 0 VALUES c LLD 4.54E 4.54E-02 YARD POND 4.54E 4.543-02 TL-208 6.00E-02 3.08E-01( 5/ 5) LV-3 4.35E-01( 1/ 1) 0 VALUES c LLD 2.48E 4.35B-01 LOW VOL WASTE POND 4.35E 4.35B-01 NOTE: 1. NOMINAL LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) AS DESCRIBED IN TABLE E-1 .

NOTE: 2. MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY. FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F).

Figure H-1 Direct Radiation Thermoluminescent dosimeters are processed quarterly. This chart shows trends in the average LI measurement for all dosimeters grouped as "on-site" or "off-site". The data from preoperational phase, prior to 1996, show the same trend of "on-site" measurements higher than "off-site" measurements that is observed in current data indicating that the slightly higher "on-site" direct radiation levels are not related to plant operations.

Figure H-2 Radioactivity in Air Filters Annual Average Gross Beta Activity In Air Filters Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 0.15 A Indicator

0) 13 Contnol 0.10

_Altial Operation of WBNP t \ lI\ January. 1996 E 0.05 o 0.00 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Calendar Year To more clearly show trends developed since the end of atmospheric weapons testing, the data beginning with the resumption of the monitoring program in 1990 is shown in greater detail.

Annual Average Gross Beta Activity In Air Filters Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 0.025 --

E Q 0.020 l.

c

+i h~diatorl 0 Crontrol nitial WBNP c 0.015 . -reap Avg operation in Januarv-e 1996 4oo 0.010 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 Calendar Year Figure H-3 Cs-137 in Soil L

Cesium-137 was produced by past nuclear weapons testing and is present in almost every L environmental sample exposed to the atmosphere. The "control" and "indicator" locations have generally trended downward with year-to-year variation, since the beginning of the monitoring I, program from the Watts Bar site.

Annual Average Activity of Cs-137 In Soil Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 1.0 , ,, _ __ _

0.9 + darl 0.8 Indicatr WBNP Operation In Initial 0.7 \January, 1996 E 0.7 0.6 10.5

-0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Calendar Year In almost every year, the "indicator" locations have shown greater activity of Cs-137 than the "control" locations. This trend, with its preoperational average is shown below.

Ratio - Indicator.Control for Cs-I37 In Soil Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 3.5

3.0 Initial WBNP Operation in

< 2.5 t 2. /\ January, 1996 2-0 ...... _- r- --

1.5

• ~1.0 0.5

~0.0 z o.4 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Calendar Year Figure H4 Gross Beta Activity in Surface and Drinldng Water Annual Average Gross Beta Activity In Surface Water Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 5

CA33

-* hitcator dl hitial WBNP Operation 1o t inJanuary,1996 0 .1 200 200,_

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Calendar Year Annual Average Gross Beta Activity In Drinking Water Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 6 __

5 nhitial WBNP Operation inJanuary, 1996 C.

In--kdicator 2 E-- Control IIl 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Calendar Year Figure H-5 Radioactivity in Fish Anmd AeagekPdiAty f ;137 in nmehcal Rsi Redh bBr kdearPlart aQ3 (0. E5 E 9 110 y,196 S EQ15 L J }

0QI 1975 199 9519019 ClenhYea Annual Average Activity of Cs-137 In Game Fish Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 0.30 ------------- ------

a. 025 A wVBP Downstream Infl 0.20 - Upsteamope n p0.15

• 0.10

~0 05 (0.00 1975 1980--

1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Calendar Year Figure H-6 Radioactivity in Shoreline Sediment L

The Cs-137 present in the shoreline sediments of the Tennessee River system was produced L both by testing of nuclear weapons and by related nuclear operations in the upper reaches of the Tennessee River watershed. The amounts of Cs-137 have declined significantly during the course of monitoring for the Watts Bar site, so much so that not all samples contain detectable L levels.

Annual Average AMvity of Cs(137 InShoreline Seciment Watts Bar Nuldear Plant Q6 _*_ ____-__ *- _- -

.~0.5 o0uX , , &VG

~0.2 0.1 co 1

0 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 0 2000 Ca endar Year