Text

Emergency Plan Document Revisions Implemented November, 2021
	ML22139A002
Person / Time
Site:	Salem, Hope Creek
Issue date:	05/19/2022
From:	Barr S; Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	LR-N22-0044
	Download: ML22139A002 (86)
	v • d • e

PSEG Nuclear LLC P.O . Box 2 36 , Han cock s Bridge, New Je rsey 08038-0236 0 PSEG NuclearLLC 10 CFR 50.54(q)

LR-N22-0044 May 19, 2022 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-70 and DPR-75 NRC Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311 Hope Creek Generating Station Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-57 NRC Docket No. 50-354

Subject:

Emergency Plan Document Revisions Implemented November, 2021.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(q) and 10 CFR 50.4(b)(5), PSEG Nuclear LLC (PSEG) is submitting 10 CFR 50.54(q) Summary Analysis Report 2021-32 for the revision to the Hope Creek Initial Contact Message Forms: EP-HC-325-F1, F2, F3, F24 Rev. 01, EP-HC-325-F4 Rev. 02 (Attachments 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) and Summary Analysis Report 2021-33 for the revision to the Salem Initial Contact Message Forms:

EP-SA-325-F1, F2, F3, F24 Rev. 01 and EP-SA-325-F4 Rev.02 (Attachments 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12).

There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter.

Should you have any questions, or require further information regarding this submittal, please contact Ms. Megean M. Brown (856) 339-1773.

Respectfully, Stephen T. Barr Manager, Emergency Preparedness

Page 2 10 CFR 50.54(q)

LR-N22-0044 - 10 CFR 50.54(q) Summary Analysis Report 2021-32 - EP-HC-325-F1 Rev. 1 - Attachment 1 Unusual Event - EP-HC-325-F2 Rev. 1 - Attachment 2 Alert - EP-HC-325-F3 Rev. 1 - Attachment 3 Site Area Emergency - EP-HC-325-F4 Rev. 2 - Attachment 4 General Emergency - EP-HC-325-F24 Rev. 1 - Attachment 24 Unusual Event (Common Site) - 10 CFR 50.54(q) Summary Analysis Report 2021-33 - EP-SA-325-F1 Rev. 1 - Attachment 1 Unusual Event - EP-SA-325-F2 Rev. 1 - Attachment 2 Alert 0 - EP-SA-325-F3 Rev. 1 - Attachment 3 Site Area Emergency 1 - EP-SA-325-F4 Rev. 2 - Attachment 4 General Emergency 2 - EP-SA-325-F24 Rev. 1 - Attachment 24 Unusual Event (Common Site) cc: USNRC Administrator, Region I USNRC Project Manager USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, Salem USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, Hope Creek NJDEP Bureau of Nuclear Engineering PSEG Corporate Commitment Tracking Coordinator

LR-N22-0044 LRLRN ATTACHMENT 1 10 CFR 50.54(q) Summary Analysis Report 2021-32

EP-AA-120-1001 Revision 5 ATTACHMENT 3 10CFR50.54(q)

SUMMARY

ANALYSIS REPORT Page 1 of 2 Revision 0 50.54Q I.D. Number: 2021-32 50.54Q

Title:

HC Initial Contact Message Forms: EP-HC-325-F1, F2, F3, F24 Rev. 01 and EP-HC-325-F4 Rev. 02 (Doc #, Rev. #, Name, If applicable)

Description of the change made to the Emergency Plan/Procedures:

For EP-HC-325-F1, Moved bullet item UPDATE the Crew/Facility with the Emergency classification level and potential escalation criteria up to Section A Step 3. This step is being moved to ensure crew/facility is aware of Emergency Classification/Escalation criteria in a timely manner.

For EP-HC-325-F2, F3, F4 & F24, Moved bullet item UPDATE the Crew/Facility with the Emergency classification level and potential escalation criteria up to Section A Step 4. This step is being moved to ensure crew/facility is aware of Emergency Classification/Escalation criteria in a timely manner.

Revised ICMF approval from EC Initials to EC Print/Sign. All required PSEG approvals for documentation require Print/Sign.

Added Radioactive Release Determination Flow Chart. The chart is being added to provide clarification to the decision making process for radiation release determination.

Added A sustained positive Secondary Containment D/P to the Rad Release Determination definition.

Description of why the change is editorial (if not editorial, N/A this block):

N/A Description of the licensing basis affected by the change to the Emergency Plan/Procedure (if not affected, omit this element):

Emergency Plan Sections 5.0 - Emergency Classification System, Section 6.0 - Notification Methods, and Section 10.0 - Accident Assessment, describe methods and processes for accident assessment and notifications. Section 16.0 describes the Emergency Plan training program. The proposed revisions to EP-HC-325-F1, F2, F3, F4 and F24 provide classification process clarification and radiation release assessment clarification and do not impact the requirements of the above mentioned sections.

A description of how the change to the Emergency Plan/Procedures still complies with regulation:

Based on a review of regulations, the proposed changes comply with 10 CFR 50 Appendix E and with Regulatory Guide 1.219, Revision 1. The revisions were evaluated against the requirements of planning standards 10 CFR 50.47 (b)(5), (b)(9), and (b)(15), and were found to have no adverse impact.

EP-AA-120-1001 Revision 5 ATTACHMENT 3 10CFR50.54(q)

SUMMARY

ANALYSIS REPORT Page 2 of 2 Revision 0 50.54Q I.D. Number: 2021-32 50.54Q

Title:

HC Initial Contact Message Forms: EP-HC-325-F1, F2, F3, F24 Rev. 01 and EP-HC-325-F4 Rev. 02 (Doc #, Rev. #, Name, If applicable)

A description of why the proposed change was not a reduction in the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan/Procedure:

The proposed changes will improve emergency classification timeliness and ensure crews and facilities are aware of accident conditions and escalation criteria.

The proposed unmonitored radiation release definition and decision flow chart improves decision making for Emergency Coordinators and Direct Reports.

The proposed changes to add approval Print/Sign instead of initials only aligns with station procedures when approving documents.

The proposed changes have been validated through use in Licensed Operator Training.

Training will be provide to Operations personnel through the Licensed Operator Training program.

Training for the Emergency Coordinators in the TSC and EOF and their Direct Reports will be provided through Emergency Preparedness lead Focus Area Drills.

There is no reduction in effectiveness to the Emergency Plan resulting from these proposed revisions.

LR-N22-0044 ATTACHMENT 2 EP-HC-325-F1 Rev. 1 - Attachment 1 Unusual Event

EP-HC-325-F1 ATT 1 Pg. 1 of 6 ATTACHMENT 1 UNUSUAL EVENT A. CLASSIFICATION

1. CALL communicators to the Control Room SM

2. If time allows, DIRECT Classification Independent Verification to be performed SM

3. After Classification Independent Verification is obtained:

DECLARE the UNUSUAL EVENT (enter time and date on ICMF) _______

EC UPDATE Crew/Facility with Emergency Classification Level and potential escalation Criteria _______

EC COMPLETE / APPROVE the ICMF _______

EC

4. If time allows OBTAIN accuracy peer check of the completed ICMF EC

5. Continue with NOTIFICATION AND ACTIVATION as follows:

If desired, ACTIVATE / DIRECT ACTIVATION of ERO Emergency Callout (Optional at UE)

(EP 96-003) EC DIRECT the Primary Communicator to implement ECG Attachment 6 EC DIRECT the Secondary Communicator to implement ECG Attachment 8 for an UNUSUAL EVENT _______

EC If ACTIVATION was performed, VERIFY / DIRECT VERIFICATION of ERO Emergency Callout activation _______

EC IMPLEMENT NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0102, EC Response EC HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F1 ATT 1 Pg. 2 of 6 INITIAL CONTACT MESSAGE FORM I. THIS IS _________________________, COMMUNICATOR IN THE CONTROL ROOM (NAME)

AT THE HOPE CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION.

II. THIS IS NOTIFICATION OF AN UNUSUAL EVENT WHICH WAS DECLARED AT ON (Time - 24 HR CLOCK) (DATE)

EAL # DESCRIPTION OF EVENT

}

Any release above III. THERE IS A RELEASE IN PROGRESS DUE TO THE EVENT normal, attributable to the event. See THERE IS NO RELEASE IN PROGRESS DUE TO THE EVENT flow chart for assessment.

IV. 33 FT. LEVEL WIND DIRECTION (From): WIND SPEED:

(From MET Computer /SPDS) (DEGREES) (MPH)

V. NO PROTECTIVE ACTIONS ARE RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME EC Print/Sign (Approval to Transmit ICMF)

HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F1 ATT 1 Pg. 3 of 6 HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F1 ATT 1 Pg. 4 of 6 Classification Non-Delegable Actions: Actions taken in the process of emergency classification maybe delegated as needed with the exception of the 4 non-delegable actions listed below.

o Classify emergencies in accordance with the Salem and Hope Creek Event Classification Guides - Includes final determination of the classification and approval of the ICMF o Make decisions to notify and recommend protective actions to offsite agencies o Provide overall direction, control and coordination of PSEG Nuclears Emergency Response o Authorize the expenditure of company funds and commit corporate resources as necessary to implement emergency procedures and/or to mitigate the accident Communicators: Call communicators to the Control Room as soon as possible to provide time for them to respond from the field Independent Verification:

o When the Shift Manager (SM) is the Emergency Coordinator, the Shift Technical Advisor (STA) or Incident Assesor (IA) is responsible to perform an independent verification of the EAL classification. The STA verification does not alleviate the requirement of the SM to make a timely classification. Should the SM fill the STA role, independent verification of the EAL classification will be delegated to another on-shift SRO, the Independent Assessor.

o Independent verification, while recommended, is not required and should be performed at the SM/ECs discretion as time allows and based on plant conditions.

STA or designee performs Independent Verification for SM SM or designee performs Independent Verification for EDO EDO or designee performs Independent Verification for ERM o During the verification phase begin filling in the ICMF, completing the EAL declaration time once the EC and Independent Verifier have conferred and agree on a classification.

HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F1 ATT 1 Pg. 5 of 6 Accuracy Peer Check: Have the STA, Primary Communicator or other knowledgeable individual perform an accuracy peer check of the ICMF. The peer check should include:

o verification that the correct form has been used for the classification o review of all applicable fields that have been completed by the SM during completion of the ICMF (date, time, EAL, Description etc.) to ensure data is correct/accurate o SM approval initials have been completed o review/repeat back by the primary communicator would be considered a sufficient accuracy peer check Classification Timeliness: Classification must occur after verification and before the 15 minute EAL clock expires. Assessment of an Emergency Condition should be completed in a timely manner, which is considered to be within 15 minutes of when events are known or should have been known. If an EAL specifies a duration time (e.g., loss of annunciators for 15 minutes or longer), the assessment time runs concurrently with the EAL duration time and is the same length.

Rad Release Determination (HC): Any of the following conditions constitutes a release in progress due to the event:

o INCREASE in the total SPV, NPV or FRVS release rates resulting from the EVENT. (NOT caused by normal or shutdown plant operations or ventilation lineup changes.)

o Opening the HTV to atmosphere post RCS leakage/LOCA.

Evidence of an UNMONITORED release to atmosphere, examples include:

Steam from blowout panels directly to atmosphere Elevated background radiation levels downwind from the station as monitored/reported by Radiation Protection Technician at fence line A sustained positive Secondary Containment D/P HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F1 ATT 1 Pg. 6 of 6 Notification Callout Activation: UE o Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Emergency Callout Activation (EP Aid-031) is optional for an Unusual Event and may be implemented at the discretion of the Emergency Coordinator (EC).

o Activation maybe delegated to the communicators if available, but must be performed as soon as possible after classification. The SM shall perform the callout if communicators are not available o Activate the ERO Emergency Callout system using the posted instructions titled Emergency Callout Activation.

o ERO callout system activation will be confirmed by verification on the Everbridge Website. If callout fails, then utilize Backup Emergency Call-Out Activation (EP Aid-032).

References:

Emergency Plan, Section 3.0 - Organization, Paragraph 4.0 - Emergency Direction and Control EP-HC-325-102, ECG Use, Step 4.8 EP-HC-325-102, ECG Use, Step 1.1 EP 96-003 - Enhance callout system by correcting deficiencies and capturing time inefficiencies HCGS Rev. 01

LR-N22-0044 ATTACHMENT 3 EP-HC-325-F2 Rev. 1 - Attachment 2 Alert

EP-HC-325-F2 ATT 2 Pg. 1 of 6 ATTACHMENT 2 ALERT A. CLASSIFICATION

1. CALL communicators to the Control Room.

SM

2. IF a Security Event is in progress, THEN IMPLEMENT the prompt actions of NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0102, EC Response, Attachment 10, prior to classification. ______

SM

3. If time allows, DIRECT Classification Independent Verification to be performed ______

SM

4. After Classification Independent Verification is obtained:

DECLARE the ALERT (Enter the time and date on ICMF) ______

EC UPDATE Crew/Facility with the Emergency Classification level and potential escalation criteria ______

EC COMPLETE / APPROVE the ICMF ______

EC

5. If time allows OBTAIN accuracy peer check of the completed ICMF EC

6. Continue with NOTIFICATION AND ACTIVATION as follows:

EC If not previously performed, ACTIVATE / DIRECT ACTIVATION of ERO Emergency Callout (EP 96-003) EC DIRECT the Primary Communicator to implement ECG Attachment 6 EC DIRECT the Secondary Communicator to implement ECG Attachment 8 for an ALERT EC If not previously performed, VERIFY / DIRECT VERIFICATION of ERO Emergency Callout activation EC IMPLEMENT NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0102, EC Response EC HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F2 ATT 2 Pg. 2 of 6 INITIAL CONTACT MESSAGE FORM I. THIS IS _____________________, COMMUNICATOR IN THE CONTROL ROOM (NAME) TSC EOF AT THE HOPE CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION.

II. THIS IS NOTIFICATION OF AN ALERT WHICH WAS DECLARED AT ON (Time - 24 HR CLOCK) (DATE)

EAL # DESCRIPTION OF EVENT

}

Any release above III. THERE IS A RELEASE IN PROGRESS DUE TO THE EVENT normal, attributable to the event See flow chart for THERE IS NO RELEASE IN PROGRESS DUE TO THE EVENT assessment.

IV. 33 FT. LEVEL WIND DIRECTION (From): WIND SPEED:

(From MET Computer /SPDS) (DEGREES) (MPH)

V. NO PROTECTIVE ACTIONS ARE RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME EC Print/Sign (Approval to Transmit ICMF)

HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F2 ATT 2 Pg. 3 of 6 HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F2 ATT 2 Pg. 4 of 6 Classification Non-Delegable Actions: Actions taken in the process of emergency classification maybe delegated as needed with the exception of the 4 non-delegable actions listed below o Classify emergencies in accordance with the Salem and Hope Creek Event Classification Guides - Includes final determination of the classification and approval of the ICMF o Make decisions to notify and recommend protective actions to offsite agencies o Provide overall direction, control and coordination of PSEG Nuclears Emergency Response o Authorize the expenditure of company funds and commit corporate resources as necessary to implement emergency procedures and/or to mitigate the accident Communicators: Call communicators to the Control Room as soon as possible to provide time for them to respond from the field Independent Verification:

o When the Shift Manager (SM) is the Emergency Coordinator, the Shift Technical Advisor (STA) or Incident Assessor (IA) is responsible to perform an independent verification of the EAL classification. The STA verification does not alleviate the requirement of the SM to make a timely classification. Should the SM fill the STA role, independent verification of the EAL classification will be delegated to another on-shift SRO, the Independent Assessor.

o Independent verification, while recommended, is not required and should be performed at the SM/ECs discretion as time allows and based on plant conditions.

STA or designee performs Independent Verification for SM SM or designee performs Independent Verification for EDO EDO or designee performs Independent Verification for ERM o During the verification phase begin filling in the ICMF, completing the EAL declaration time once the EC and Independent Verifier have conferred and agree on a classification.

HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F2 ATT 2 Pg. 5 of 6 Accuracy Peer Check: Have the STA, Primary Communicator or other knowledgeable individual perform an accuracy peer check of the ICMF. The peer check should include:

o verification that the correct form has been used for the classification o review of all applicable fields that have been completed by the SM during completion of the ICMF (date, time, EAL, Description etc.) to ensure data is correct/accurate o SM approval initials have been completed.

o review/repeat back by the primary communicator would be considered a sufficient accuracy peer check Classification Timeliness: Classification must occur after verification and before the 15 minute EAL clock expires. Assessment of an Emergency Condition should be completed in a timely manner, which is considered to be within 15 minutes of when events are known or should have been known. If an EAL specifies a duration time (e.g., loss of annunciators for 15 minutes or longer), the assessment time runs concurrently with the EAL duration time and is the same length.

Rad Release Determination (HC): Determination of a release: any of the following conditions constitutes a release in progress due to the event:

o INCREASE in the total SPV, NPV or FRVS release rates resulting from the EVENT. (NOT caused by normal or shutdown plant operations or ventilation lineup changes.)

o Opening the HTV to atmosphere post RCS leakage/LOCA.

o Evidence of an UNMONITORED release to atmosphere, examples include:

Steam from blowout panels directly to atmosphere Elevated background radiation levels downwind from the station as monitored/reported by Radiation Protection Technician at fence line A sustained positive Secondary Containment D/P HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F2 ATT 2 Pg. 6 of 6 Notification Callout Activation (Alert, SAE, GE):

o Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Emergency Callout Activation (EP Aid-031) is required for an Alert or higher classification.

o Activation maybe delegated to the communicators if available, but must be performed as soon as possible after classification. The SM shall perform the callout if communicators are not available.

o Activate the ERO Emergency Callout system using the posted instructions titled Emergency Callout Activation.

o ERO callout system activation will be confirmed by verification on the Everbridge Website. If callout fails, then utilize Backup Emergency Call-Out Activation (EP Aid-032).

References:

Emergency Plan, Section 3.0 - Organization, Paragraph 4.0 - Emergency Direction and Control EP-HC-325-102, ECG Use, Step 4.8 EP-HC-325-102, ECG Use, Step 1.1 EP 96-003 - Enhance callout system by correcting deficiencies and capturing time inefficiencies HCGS Rev. 01

LR-N22-0044 ATTACHMENT 4 EP-HC-325-F3 Rev. 1 - Attachment 3 Site Area Emergency

EP-HC-325-F3 ATT 3 Pg. 1 of 6 ATTACHMENT 3 SITE AREA EMERGENCY A. CLASSIFICATION

1. CALL communicators to the Control Room.

SM

2. IF a Security Event is in progress, THEN IMPLEMENT the prompt actions of NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0102, EC Response, Attachment 10, prior to classification.

SM

3. If time allows, DIRECT Classification Independent Verification to be performed ______

SM

4. After Classification Independent Verification is obtained:

DECLARE the SITE AREA EMERGENCY (enter time and date on ICMF). ______

EC UPDATE Crew/Facility with the Emergency Classification level and potential escalation criteria. ______

EC COMPLETE / APPROVE the ICMF. ______

EC

5. If time allows OBTAIN accuracy peer check of the completed ICMF EC

6. Continue with NOTIFICATION AND ACTIVATION as follows:

If not previously performed, ACTIVATE / DIRECT ACTIVATION of ERO Emergency Callout (EP 96-003) EC DIRECT the Primary Communicator to implement ECG Attachment 6 EC DIRECT the Secondary Communicator to implement ECG Attachment 8 for a SITE AREA EMERGENCY EC If not previously performed, VERIFY / DIRECT VERIFICATION of ERO Emergency Callout activation EC IMPLEMENT NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0102, EC Response EC HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F3 ATT 3 Pg. 2 of 6 INITIAL CONTACT MESSAGE FORM I. THIS IS _____________________, COMMUNICATOR IN THE CONTROL ROOM (NAME) TSC EOF AT THE HOPE CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION.

II. THIS IS NOTIFICATION OF AN SITE AREA EMERGENCY WHICH WAS DECLARED AT ON (Time - 24 HR CLOCK) (DATE)

EAL # , ,

DESCRIPTION OF EVENT:

}

Any release above III. THERE IS A RELEASE IN PROGRESS DUE TO THE EVENT normal, attributable to the event. See flow chart for THERE IS NO RELEASE IN PROGRESS DUE TO THE EVENT assessment IV. 33 FT. LEVEL WIND DIRECTION (From): WIND SPEED:

(From MET Computer /SPDS) (DEGREES) (MPH)

V. NO PROTECTIVE ACTIONS ARE RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME EC Print/Sign (Approval to Transmit ICMF)

HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F3 ATT 3 Pg. 3 of 6 HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F3 ATT 3 Pg. 4 of 6 Classification Non-Delegable Actions: Actions taken in the process of emergency classification maybe delegated as needed with the exception of the 4 non-delegable actions listed below.

o Classify emergencies in accordance with the Salem and Hope Creek Event Classification Guides - Includes final determination of the classification and approval of the ICMF o Make decisions to notify and recommend protective actions to offsite agencies o Provide overall direction, control and coordination of PSEG Nuclear s Emergency Response o Authorize the expenditure of company funds and commit corporate resources as necessary to implement emergency procedures and/or to mitigate the accident Communicators: Call communicators to the Control Room as soon as possible to provide time for them to respond from the field Independent Verification:

o When the Shift Manager (SM) is the Emergency Coordinator, the Shift Technical Advisor (STA) or Incident Assessor (IA) is responsible to perform an independent verification of the EAL classification. The STA verification does not alleviate the requirement of the SM to make a timely classification. Should the SM fill the STA role, independent verification of the EAL classification will be delegated to another on-shift SRO, the Independent Assessor.

o Independent verification, while recommended, is not required and should be performed at the SM/ECs discretion as time allows and based on plant conditions.

STA or designee performs Independent Verification for SM SM or designee performs Independent Verification for EDO EDO or designee performs Independent Verification for ERM o During the verification phase begin filling in the ICMF, completing the EAL declaration time once the EC and Independent Verifier have conferred and agree on a classification.

HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F3 ATT 3 Pg. 5 of 6 Accuracy Peer Check: Have the STA, Primary Communicator or other knowledgeable individual perform an accuracy peer check of the ICMF. The peer check should include:

o verification that the correct form has been used for the classification o review of all applicable fields that have been completed by the SM during completion of the ICMF (date, time, EAL, Description etc.) to ensure data is correct/accurate o SM approval initials have been completed.

o review/repeat back by the primary communicator would be considered a sufficient accuracy peer check Classification Timeliness: Classification must occur after verification and before the 15 minute EAL clock expires. Assessment of an Emergency Condition should be completed in a timely manner, which is considered to be within 15 minutes of when events are known or should have been known. If an EAL specifies a duration time (e.g., loss of annunciators for 15 minutes or longer), the assessment time runs concurrently with the EAL duration time and is the same length.

Rad Release Determination (HC): Determination of a release: any of the following conditions constitutes a release in progress due to the event:

o INCREASE in the total SPV, NPV or FRVS release rates resulting from the EVENT. (NOT caused by normal or shutdown plant operations or ventilation lineup changes.)

o Opening the HTV to atmosphere post RCS leakage/LOCA.

o Evidence of an UNMONITORED release to atmosphere, examples include:

Steam from blowout panels directly to atmosphere Elevated background radiation levels downwind from the station as monitored/reported by Radiation Protection Technician at fence line A sustained positive Secondary Containment D/P HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F3 ATT 3 Pg. 6 of 6 Notification Callout Activation (Alert, SAE, GE):

o Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Emergency Callout Activation (EP Aid-031) is required for an Alert or higher classification.

o Activation maybe delegated to the communicators if available, but must be performed as soon as possible after classification. The SM shall perform the callout if communicators are not available.

o Activate the ERO Emergency Callout system using the posted instructions titled Emergency Callout Activation.

o ERO callout system activation will be confirmed by verification of the Everbridge Website. If callout fails, then utilize Backup Emergency Call-Out Activation (EP Aid-032).

References:

Emergency Plan, Section 3.0 - Organization, Paragraph 4.0 - Emergency Direction and Control EP-HC-325-102, ECG Use, Step 4.8 EP-HC-325-102, ECG Use, Step 1.1 EP 96-003 - Enhance callout system by correcting deficiencies and capturing time inefficiencies HCGS Rev. 01

LR-N22-0044 ATTACHMENT 5 EP-HC-325-F4 Rev. 2 - Attachment 4 General Emergency

EP-HC-325-F4 ATT 4 Pg. 1 of 9 ATTACHMENT 4 GENERAL EMERGENCY A. CLASSIFICATION

1. CALL communicators to the Control Room.

SM

2. IF a Security Event is in progress, THEN IMPLEMENT the prompt actions of NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0102, EC Response, Attachment 10, prior to classification.

SM

3. If time allows, DIRECT Classification Independent Verification to be performed SM

4. After Classification Independent Verification is obtained:

DECLARE the GENERAL EMERGENCY (enter time and date on ICMF)

EC UPDATE Crew/Facility with Emergency Classification level and potential escalation criteria EC COMPLETE / APPROVE the ICMF EC

5. If time allows OBTAIN accuracy peer check of the completed ICMF EC

6. Continue with NOTIFICATION AND ACTIVATION as follows:

If not previously performed, ACTIVATE / DIRECT ACTIVATION of ERO Emergency Callout (EP 96-003) EC DIRECT the Primary Communicator to implement ECG Attachment 6 EC DIRECT the Secondary Communicator to implement ECG Attachment 8 for a GENERAL EMERGENCY EC If not previously performed, VERIFY / DIRECT VERIFICATION of ERO Emergency Callout activation EC IMPLEMENT NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0102, EC Response EC HCGS Rev. 2

EP-HC-325-F4 ATT 4 Pg. 2 of 9 INITIAL CONTACT MESSAGE FORM I. THIS IS _____________________, COMMUNICATOR IN THE CONTROL ROOM (NAME) TSC EOF AT THE HOPE CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION.

IIa. THIS IS NOTIFICATION OF AN GENERAL EMERGENCY WHICH WAS DECLARED AT ON (Time - 24 HR CLOCK) (DATE)

EAL # , ,

DESCRIPTION OF EVENT:

I ---------------------~

OR I L-------------------------*

I I IIb. THIS IS NOTIFICATION OF A PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION UPGRADE MADE AT HRS ON (Time - 24 HR CLOCK) (DATE)

Reason for PAR Upgrade:

}

Any release III. THERE IS A RELEASE IN PROGRESS DUE TO THE EVENT above normal, attributable to the THERE IS NO RELEASE IN PROGRESS DUE TO THE EVENT event. See Basis for examples.

IV. 33 FT. LEVEL WIND DIRECTION (From): WIND SPEED:

(From MET Computer /SPDS) (DEGREES) (MPH)

V. Sectors Dist. - Mile WE RECOMMEND EVACUATION AS FOLLOWS WE RECOMMEND SHELTERING AS FOLLOWS WE RECOMMEND MONITOR AND PREPARE AS FOLLOWS WE RECOMMEND THE USE OF KI IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE PROCEDURES EC Print/Sign (Approval to Transmit ICMF)

HCGS Rev. 2

EP-HC-325-F4 ATT 4 Pg. 3 of 9 Hope Creek-Release In Progress Determination Guidance An Airborne release due to the event is defined as:

Any airborne radioactive release (Particulate, Iodine or Noble Gas) that is a result of, or caused by, the emergency event.

Has the event caused a leak from the Reactor Coolant No System?

OR Caused Fuel Damage? (1)

Yes Does the resulting radioactive material have an unmonitored pathway beyond the secondary No containment to the environment?

OR Is the release outside of the secondary containment? (3)

Yes Yes Is there a rise in an effluent radiation monitor to the environment? (2)

No Yes Has any airborne radioactivity (other than naturally occurring) been detected by survey or sampling in site ventilation or building with an unmonitored pathway to the environment?

No Yes Has any radioactivity (other than naturally occurring) been detected by survey or sampling in the environment?

No Is the release a direct result of No or caused by the Emergency No Release in Progress Event?

Yes A Release is in Progress

1. Fuel damage is considered to be ANY damage to IRRADIATED fuel in the reactor vessel, spent fuel pool or ISFSI (Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation).

2. Any of the following conditions constitutes a release in progress due to the event:

INCREASE in the total SPV, NPV or FRVS release rates resulting from the EVENT. (NOT caused by normal or shutdown plant operations or ventilation lineup changes.)

Opening the HTV to atmosphere post RCS leakage/LOCA.

3. Evidence of an UNMONITORED release to atmosphere. (examples include)

Steam from blowout panels directly to atmosphere Elevated background radiation levels downwind from the station as monitored/reported by Radiation Protection Technician at fence line A sustained positive Secondary Containment D/P.

HCGS Rev. 2

EP-HC-325-F4 ATT 4 Pg. 4 of 9 BASIS - GE ICMF Classification Non-Delegable Actions: Actions taken in the process of emergency classification maybe delegated as needed with the exception of the 4 non-delegable actions listed below (1) o Classify emergencies in accordance with the Salem and Hope Creek Event Classification Guides - Includes final determination of the classification and approval of the ICMF o Make decisions to notify and recommend protective actions to offsite agencies o Provide overall direction, control and coordination of PSEG Nuclears Emergency Response o Authorize the expenditure of company funds and commit corporate resources as necessary to implement emergency procedures and/or to mitigate the accident Communicators: Call communicators to the Control Room as soon as possible to provide time for them to respond from the field Independent Verification:

o When the Shift Manager (SM) is the Emergency Coordinator, the Shift Technical Advisor (STA) is responsible to perform an independent verification of the EAL classification. The STA verification does not alleviate the requirement of the SM to make a timely classification.

Should the SM fill the STA role, independent verification of the EAL classification will be delegated to another on-shift SRO, the Independent Assessor.

o Independent verification, while recommended, is not required and should be performed at the SM/ECs discretion as time allows and based on plant conditions. (2)

STA or designee performs Independent Verification for SM SM or designee performs Independent Verification for EDO EDO or designee performs Independent Verification for ERM o During the verification phase begin filling in the ICMF, completing the EAL declaration time once the EC and Independent Verifier have conferred and agree on a classification.

HCGS Rev. 2

EP-HC-325-F4 ATT 4 Pg. 5 of 9 Accuracy Peer Check: Have the STA, Primary Communicator or other knowledgeable individual perform an accuracy peer check of the ICMF. The peer check should include:

o verification that the correct form has been used for the classification o review of all applicable fields that have been completed by the SM during completion of the ICMF (date, time, EAL, Description etc.) to ensure data is correct/accurate o SM approval initials have been completed o review/repeat back by the primary communicator would be considered a sufficient accuracy peer check Classification Timeliness: Classification must occur after verification and before the 15 minute EAL clock expires. Assessment of an Emergency Condition should be completed in a timely manner, which is considered to be within 15 minutes of when events are known or should have been known. If an EAL specifies a duration time (e.g., loss of annunciators for 15 minutes or longer), the assessment time runs concurrently with the EAL duration time and is the same length. (3)

PAR Upgrades: ECG Attachment 4 is used for declaration of a General Emergency and also for PAR upgrades IAW NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0102 and NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0404. When completing the form for a PAR upgrade, steps not applicable to the PAR upgrade process should be N/Ad as appropriate.

Rad Release Determination (HC): Determination of a release: any of the following conditions constitutes a release in progress due to the event Creek o INCREASE in the total SPV, NPV or FRVS release rates resulting from the EVENT. (NOT caused by normal or shutdown plant operations or ventilation lineup changes.)

o Opening the HTV to atmosphere post RCS leakage/LOCA.

o Evidence of an UNMONITORED release to atmosphere, examples include:

Steam from blowout panels directly to atmosphere Elevated background radiation levels downwind from the station as monitored/reported by Radiation Protection Technician at fence line A sustained positive Secondary Containment D/P HCGS Rev. 2

EP-HC-325-F4 ATT 4 Pg. 6 of 9 Notification Callout Activation (Alert, SAE, GE):

o Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Emergency Callout Activation (EP Aid-031) is required for an Alert or higher classification.

o Activation maybe delegated to the communicators if available, but must be performed as soon as possible after classification. The SM shall perform the callout if communicators are not available.

o Activate the ERO Emergency Callout system using the posted instructions titled Emergency Callout Activation.

o ERO callout system activation will be confirmed by a return call from the Everbridge system to the Communicators phone. If callout fails, then utilize Backup Emergency Call-Out Activation (EP Aid-032).

References:

(1) Emergency Plan, Section 3.0 - Organization, Paragraph 4.0 - Emergency Direction and Control (2) EP-HC-325-102, ECG Use, Step 4.8 (3) EP-HC-325-102, ECG Use, Step 1.1 (4) EP 96-003 - Enhance callout system by correcting deficiencies and capturing time inefficiencies HCGS Rev. 2

EP-HC-325-F4 ATT 4 Pg. 7 of 9 APPENDIX 1 PREDETERMINED PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS Page 1 of 2 General Emergency?

Yes No No TSC/EOF:

Initial Is PAR from PAR? Control Room?

Go to PAR Upgrade Procedure NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0404 Yes Yes Go to Page 2 GE based on Loss No Is there a No of Three Fission Hostile Action Event Product Barriers in Progress affecting (13 Pts.)? the GE?

Yes Yes Is a DAPA monitor No indicating > 10,000 R/hr?

OR A release in progress

> 5.25E+08 uCi/sec (2)

(EAL RG1.1)

Yes Initial PARs (1)

RPSA PAR HAB PAR Default PAR (No RPSA)

Evacuate All Sectors 0-5 miles

Shelter All Sectors 0-5 miles

Evacuate All Sectors 0-5 miles

Evacuate +/- 1 Sector Downwind 5-10 miles

Monitor & Prepare All Sectors

Monitor & Prepare All Sectors

Shelter All Remaining Sectors 5-10 miles 5-10 miles 5-10 miles SEE LAST PAGE OF ATTACHMENT TO DETERMINE DOWNWIND SECTORS (1) RPSA is a Rapidly Progressing Severe Accident (2) RG1.1 defines a significant release in progress HCGS Rev. 2

EP-HC-325-F4 ATT 4 Pg. 8 of 9 APPENDIX 1 PREDETERMINED PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS Page 2 of 2 From Page 1 CONTROL ROOM ONLY Entry Condition:

A Wind Shift has occurred - Consider PAR Upgrade (Start with previous PAR)

Was the Initial PAR No a Hostile Action Event or Default?

Yes No PAR Upgrade Required *RPSA PAR Upgrade Evacuate New Downwind Sectors 5-10 miles Evacuate New Downwind + 1 Sector 5-10 miles Shelter All Remaining Sectors 5-10 miles SEE LAST PAGE OF ATTACHMENT TO DETERMINE DOWNWIND SECTORS

RPSA is a Rapidly Progressing Severe Accident HCGS Rev. 2

EP-HC-325-F4 ATT 4 Pg. 9 of 9 APPENDIX 1 (continued)

RECOMMENDED PROTECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET WIND DIRECTION PAR AFFECTED SECTORS FROM DEGREES COMPASS DOWNWIND 1 SECTORS 349 - 011 N SSE - S - SSW 011 - 034 NNE S - SSW - SW 034 - 056 NE SSW - SW - WSW 056 - 079 ENE SW - WSW - W 079 - 101 E WSW - W - WNW 101 - 124 ESE W - WNW - NW 124 - 146 SE WNW - NW - NNW 146 - 169 SSE NW - NNW - N 169 - 191 S NNW - N - NNE 191 - 214 SSW N - NNE - NE 214 - 236 SW NNE - NE - ENE 236 - 259 WSW NE - ENE - E 259 - 281 W ENE - E - ESE 281 - 304 WNW E - ESE - SE 304 - 326 NW ESE - SE - SSE 326 - 349 NNW SE - SSE - S NOTE: CONSIDER ADDING A SECTOR TO THE PAR IF THE WIND DIRECTION (FROM) IS WITHIN 3o OF A SECTOR DIVIDING LINE.

10 MILES 349O 011O 326O NORTH 034O NNW NNE NW 5 NE 304O 056O MILES WNW ENE 281O 079O WEST EAST ARTIFICAL ISLAND 101O 259O WSW ESE 236O SE 124O SW SSW SSE 214O SOUTH 146O 191O 169O HCGS Rev. 2

LR-N22-0044 ATTACHMENT 6 EP-HC-325-F24 Rev. 1 - Attachment 24 Unusual Event (Common Site)

EP-HC-325-F24 ATT 24 Pg. 1 of 7 ATTACHMENT 24 UNUSUAL EVENT (COMMON SITE)

NOTE ONLY one Shift Manager (SM) is required to declare this event and assume the responsibilities of Emergency Coordinator (EC). The other SM should perform support duties in accordance with NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0101, Actions Required at Unaffected Station.

CAUTION In the event of offsite toxic gas release affecting the site, evacuation of non-essential personnel takes precedence over notifications.

I. COMMON SITE EVENT ASSESSMENT/ EC DETERMINATION A. NOTIFICATION OF SALEM SHIFT MANAGER

1. CONTACT the SALEM SM (NETS 5124, DID 5200) and BRIEF on the specific circumstances as follows:

a. SHARE information about the event in progress.

b. OBTAIN agreement on the UNUSUAL EVENT classification.

c. DETERMINE which SM will assume EC responsibilities.

Emergency Coordinator

2. IF the SALEM SM is the EC, THEN,

a. IMPLEMENT NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0101, Actions Required at the Unaffected Station.

b. CONTACT the Hope Creek Operations Manager, Emergency Duty Officer and Hope Creek NRC resident and PROVIDE them with a briefing on the UE.

c. ASSIST the Salem SM as needed.

d. EXIT this attachment HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F24 ATT 24 Pg. 2 of 7 II. CLASSIFICATION and NOTIFICATION A. CLASSIFICATION

1. CALL communicators to the Control Room.

SM

2. IF a Security Event is in progress, THEN IMPLEMENT the prompt actions of NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0102, EC Response, Attachment 10, prior to classification.

SM

3. If time allows, DIRECT Classification Independent Verification to be performed EC

4. After Classification Independent Verification is obtained:

DECLARE the UNUSUAL EVENT (enter time and date on ICMF) ______

EC UPDATE Crew/Facility with the Emergency Classification and potential escalation criteria ______

EC COMPLETE / APPROVE the ICMF ______

EC

5. If time allows, OBTAIN accuracy peer check of the completed ICMF EC

6. Continue with NOTIFICATION AND ACTIVATION as follows:

NOTE Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Emergency Callout Activation is required for an Unusual Event based on a Security Event.

Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Emergency Callout Activation is optional and may be implemented at the discretion of the Emergency Coordinator (EC) for all other Unusual Events.

If desired, ACTIVATE / DIRECT ACTIVATION of ERO Emergency Callout (EP 96-003) EC DIRECT the Primary Communicator to implement ECG Attachment 6 EC DIRECT the Secondary Communicator to implement ECG Attachment 8 for an UNUSUAL EVENT EC If ACTIVATION was performed, VERIFY / DIRECT VERIFICATION of ERO Emergency Callout activation EC IMPLEMENT NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0102, EC Response EC HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F24 ATT 24 Pg. 3 of 7 INITIAL CONTACT MESSAGE FORM I. THIS IS ___________________, COMMUNICATOR IN THE CONTROL ROOM (NAME)

AT THE HOPE CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION.

II. THIS IS NOTIFICATION OF A COMMON SITE UNUSUAL EVENT AFFECTING BOTH SALEM AND HOPE CREEK WHICH WAS DECLARED AT ON (Time - 24 HR CLOCK) (DATE)

EAL # DESCRIPTION OF EVENT

}

Any release above III. THERE IS A RELEASE IN PROGRESS DUE TO THE EVENT normal, attributable to the event. See flow chart for THERE IS NO RELEASE IN PROGRESS DUE TO THE EVENT assessment IV. 33 FT. LEVEL WIND DIRECTION (From): WIND SPEED:

(From MET Computer /SPDS) (DEGREES) (MPH)

V. NO PROTECTIVE ACTIONS ARE RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME EC Print/Sign (Approval to transmit ICMF)

HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F24 ATT 24 Pg. 4 of 7 HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F24 ATT 24 Pg. 5 of 7 Classification Non-Delegable Actions: Actions taken in the process of emergency classification maybe delegated as needed with the exception of the 4 non-delegable actions listed below o Classify emergencies in accordance with the Salem and Hope Creek Event Classification Guides - Includes final determination of the classification and approval of the ICMF o Make decisions to notify and recommend protective actions to offsite agencies o Provide overall direction, control and coordination of PSEG Nuclears Emergency Response o Authorize the expenditure of company funds and commit corporate resources as necessary to implement emergency procedures and/or to mitigate the accident Communicators: Call communicators to the Control Room as soon as possible to provide time for them to respond from the field Independent Verification:

o When the Shift Manager (SM) is the Emergency Coordinator, the Shift Technical Advisor (STA) or Incident Assessor (IA) is responsible to perform an independent verification of the EAL classification. The STA verification does not alleviate the requirement of the SM to make a timely classification. Should the SM fill the STA role, independent verification of the EAL classification will be delegated to another on-shift SRO, the Independent Assessor.

o Independent verification, while recommended, is not required and should be performed at the SM/ECs discretion as time allows and based on plant conditions.

STA or designee performs Independent Verification for SM SM or designee performs Independent Verification for EDO EDO or designee performs Independent Verification for ERM o During the verification phase begin filling in the ICMF, completing the EAL declaration time once the EC and Independent Verifier have conferred and agree on a classification.

HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F24 ATT 24 Pg. 6 of 7 Accuracy Peer Check: Have the STA, Primary Communicator or other knowledgeable individual perform an accuracy peer check of the ICMF. The peer check should include:

o verification that the correct form has been used for the classification o review of all applicable fields that have been completed by the SM during completion of the ICMF (date, time, EAL, Description etc.) to ensure data is correct/accurate o SM approval initials have been completed Classification Timeliness: Classification must occur after verification and before the 15 minute EAL clock expires. Assessment of an Emergency Condition should be completed in a timely manner, which is considered to be within 15 minutes of when events are known or should have been known. If an EAL specifies a duration time (e.g., loss of annunciators for 15 minutes or longer), the assessment time runs concurrently with the EAL duration time and is the same length.

Rad Release Determination (Hope Creek): Any of the following conditions constitutes a release in progress due to the event:

o INCREASE in the total SPV, NPV or FRVS release rates resulting from the EVENT. (NOT caused by normal or shutdown plant operations or ventilation lineup changes.)

o Opening the HTV to atmosphere post RCS leakage/LOCA.

o Evidence of an UNMONITORED release to atmosphere, examples include:

Steam from blowout panels directly to atmosphere Elevated background radiation levels downwind from the station as monitored/reported by Radiation Protection Technician at fence line A sustained positive Secondary Containment D/P HCGS Rev. 01

EP-HC-325-F24 ATT 24 Pg. 7 of 7 Notification Callout Activation: UE o Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Emergency Callout Activation (EP Aid-031) is required for an Unusual Event based on a Security Event. Activation is optional for all other Unusual Events and may be implemented at the discretion of the Emergency Coordinator (EC).

o Activation maybe delegated to the communicators if available, but must be performed as soon as possible after classification. The SM shall perform the callout if communicators are not available.

o Activate the ERO Emergency Callout system using the posted instructions titled Emergency Callout Activation.

o ERO callout system activation will be confirmed by verification on the ERO web page. If callout fails, then utilize Backup Emergency Call-Out Activation (EP Aid-032).

References:

(1) Emergency Plan, Section 3.0 - Organization, Paragraph 4.0 - Emergency Direction and Control (2) EP-HC-325-102, ECG Use, Step 4.8 (3) EP-HC-325-102, ECG Use, Step 1.1 (4) EP 96-003 - Enhance callout system by correcting deficiencies and capturing time inefficiencies HCGS Rev. 01

LR-N22-0044 ATTACHMENT 7 10 CFR 50.54(q) Summary Analysis Report 2021-33

EP-AA-120-1001 Revision 5 ATTACHMENT 3 10CFR50.54(q)

SUMMARY

ANALYSIS REPORT Page 1 of 2 Revision 0 50.54Q I.D. Number: 2021-33 50.54Q

Title:

SA Initial Contact Message Forms: EP-SA-325-F1, F2, F3, F24 Rev. 01 and EP-SA-325-F4 Rev. 02 (Doc #, Rev. #, Name, If applicable)

Description of the change made to the Emergency Plan/Procedures:

For EP-SA-325-F1, Moved bullet item UPDATE the Crew/Facility with the Emergency classification level and potential escalation criteria up to Section A Step 3. This step is being moved to ensure crew/facility is aware of Emergency Classification/Escalation criteria in a timely manner.

For EP-SA-325-F2, F3, F4 & F24, Moved bullet item UPDATE the Crew/Facility with the Emergency classification level and potential escalation criteria up to Section A Step 4. This step is being moved to ensure crew/facility is aware of Emergency Classification/Escalation criteria in a timely manner.

Revised ICMF approval from EC Initials to EC Print/Sign. All required PSEG approvals for documentation require Print/Sign.

Added Rad Release Determination Flow Chart. The chart is being added to provide clarification to the decision making process for radiation release determination.

Description of why the change is editorial (if not editorial, N/A this block):

N/A Description of the licensing basis affected by the change to the Emergency Plan/Procedure (if not affected, omit this element):

Emergency Plan Sections 5.0 - Emergency Classification System, Section 6.0 - Notification Methods, and Section 10.0 - Accident Assessment, describe methods and processes for accident assessment and notifications. Section 16.0 describes the Emergency Plan training program. The proposed revisions to EP-SA-325-F1, F2, F3, F4 and F24 provide classification process clarification and radiation release assessment clarification and do not impact the requirements of the above mentioned sections.

A description of how the change to the Emergency Plan/Procedures still complies with regulation:

Based on a review of regulations, the proposed changes comply with 10 CFR 50 Appendix E and with Regulatory Guide 1.219, Revision 1. The revisions were evaluated against the requirements of planning standards 10 CFR 50.47 (b)(5), (b)(9), and (b)(15), and were found to have no adverse impact.

EP-AA-120-1001 Revision 5 ATTACHMENT 3 10CFR50.54(q)

SUMMARY

ANALYSIS REPORT Page 2 of 2 Revision 0 50.54Q I.D. Number: 2021-33 50.54Q

Title:

SA Initial Contact Message Forms: EP-SA-325-F1, F2, F3, F24 Rev. 01 and EP-SA-325-F4 Rev. 02 (Doc #, Rev. #, Name, If applicable)

A description of why the proposed change was not a reduction in the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan/Procedure:

The proposed changes will improve emergency classification timeliness and ensure crews and facilities are aware of accident conditions and escalation criteria.

The proposed decision flow chart improves decision making for Emergency Coordinators and Direct Reports.

The proposed changes to add approval Print/Sign instead of initials only aligns with station procedures when approving documents.

The proposed changes have been validated through use in Licensed Operator Training.

Training will be provide to Operations personnel through the Licensed Operator Training program.

Training for the Emergency Coordinators in the TSC and EOF and their Direct Reports will be provided through Emergency Preparedness lead Focus Area Drills.

There is no reduction in effectiveness to the Emergency Plan resulting from these proposed revisions.

LR-N22-0044 ATTACHMENT 8 EP-SA-325-F1 Rev. 1 - Attachment 1 Unusual Event

EP-SA-325-F1 ATT 1 Pg. 1 of 6 ATTACHMENT 1 UNUSUAL EVENT A. CLASSIFICATION

1. CALL communicators to the Control Room SM

2. If time allows, DIRECT Classification Independent Verification to be performed SM

3. After Classification Independent Verification is obtained:

DECLARE the UNUSUAL EVENT (enter the time and date on the ICMF). ______

EC UPDATE the Crew/Facility with the Emergency classification level and potential escalation criteria. ______

EC COMPLETE / APPROVE the ICMF. ______

EC

4. If time allows OBTAIN accuracy peer check of the completed ICMF EC

5. Continue with NOTIFICATION AND ACTIVATION as follows:

If desired, ACTIVATE / DIRECT ACTIVATION of ERO Emergency Callout (Optional at UE)

(EP 96-003) EC DIRECT the Primary Communicator to implement ECG Attachment 6 EC DIRECT the Secondary Communicator to implement ECG Attachment 8 for an UNUSUAL EVENT EC If ACTIVATION was performed, VERIFY / DIRECT VERIFICATION of ERO Emergency Callout activation EC IMPLEMENT NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0102, EC Response EC SGS Rev.01

EP-SA-325-F1 ATT 1 Pg. 2 of 6 INITIAL CONTACT MESSAGE FORM I. THIS IS _________________________, COMMUNICATOR IN THE CONTROL ROOM (NAME)

AT THE SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT(s) No.

II. THIS IS NOTIFICATION OF AN UNUSUAL EVENT WHICH WAS DECLARED AT ON (Time - 24 HR CLOCK) (DATE)

EAL # DESCRIPTION OF EVENT

}

Any release above normal, III. THERE IS A RELEASE IN PROGRESS DUE TO THE EVENT attributable to the event. See Basis THERE IS NO RELEASE IN PROGRESS DUE TO THE EVENT for examples.

IV. 33 FT. LEVEL WIND DIRECTION (From): WIND SPEED:

(From MET Computer /SPDS) (DEGREES) (MPH)

V. NO PROTECTIVE ACTIONS ARE RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME EC Print/Sign (Approval to Transmit ICMF)

SGS Rev.01

EP-SA-325-F1 ATT 1 Pg. 3 of 6 SGS Rev.01

EP-SA-325-F1 ATT 1 Pg. 4 of 6 BASIS - UE ICMF Classification Non-Delegable Actions: Actions taken in the process of emergency classification maybe delegated as needed with the exception of the 4 non-delegable actions listed below (1) o Classify emergencies in accordance with the Salem and Hope Creek Event Classification Guides - Includes final determination of the classification and approval of the ICMF o Make decisions to notify and recommend protective actions to offsite agencies o Provide overall direction, control and coordination of PSEG Nuclears Emergency Response o Authorize the expenditure of company funds and commit corporate resources as necessary to implement emergency procedures and/or to mitigate the accident Communicators: Call communicators to the Control Room as soon as possible to provide time for them to respond from the field Independent Verification:

o When the Shift Manager (SM) is the Emergency Coordinator, the Shift Technical Advisor (STA) is responsible to perform an independent verification of the EAL classification. The STA verification does not alleviate the requirement of the SM to make a timely classification.

Should the SM fill the STA role, independent verification of the EAL classification will be delegated to another on-shift SRO, the Independent Assessor.

o Independent verification, while recommended, is not required and should be performed at the SM/ECs discretion as time allows and based on plant conditions. (2)

STA or designee performs Independent Verification for SM SM or designee performs Independent Verification for EDO EDO or designee performs Independent Verification for ERM o During the verification phase begin filling in the ICMF, completing the EAL declaration time once the EC and Independent Verifier have conferred and agree on a classification.

SGS Rev.01

EP-SA-325-F1 ATT 1 Pg. 5 of 6 Accuracy Peer Check: Have the STA, TSS, SSM or other knowledgeable individual perform an accuracy peer check of the ICMF. The peer check should include:

o verification that the correct form has been used for the classification o review of all applicable fields that have been completed by the EC during completion of the ICMF (date, time, EAL, Description etc.) to ensure data is correct/accurate o EC approval initials have been completed.

Classification Timeliness: Classification must occur after verification and before the 15 minute EAL clock expires. Assessment of an Emergency Condition should be completed in a timely manner, which is considered to be within 15 minutes of when events are known or should have been known. If an EAL specifies a duration time (e.g., loss of annunciators for 15 minutes or longer), the assessment time runs concurrently with the EAL duration time and is the same length. (3)

Rad Release Determination (Salem): Any of the following conditions constitutes a release in progress due to the event:

o Increase in Plant Vent Release Rate (NOT caused by operational transients or ventilation changes) which is caused by the EVENT.

o A Steam Generator rupture which is faulted to the atmosphere (SRV, Atmospheric Vent or Line Break) o Evidence of an UNMONITORED release to atmosphere, examples include:

Primary to Secondary leak and the steam driven feed pump is in service Bypass release from the Aux Building through the Electrical Pen Leakage from the Containment directly to atmosphere after a LOCA Elevated background radiation levels downwind from the station as monitored/reported by Radiation Protection Technician at fence line SGS Rev.01

EP-SA-325-F1 ATT 1 Pg. 6 of 6 Notification Callout Activation: UE o Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Emergency Callout Activation (EP Aid-031) is optional for an Unusual Event and may be implemented at the discretion of the Emergency Coordinator (EC).

o Activation maybe delegated to the communicators if available, but must be performed as soon as possible after classification. The SM shall perform the callout if communicators are not available.

o Activate the ERO Emergency Callout system using the posted instructions titled Emergency Callout Activation.

o ERO callout system activation will be confirmed by a return call from the Everbridge system to the Communicators phone. If callout fails, then utilize Backup Emergency Call-Out Activation (EP Aid-032).

References:

(1) Emergency Plan, Section 3.0 - Organization, Paragraph 4.0 - Emergency Direction and Control (2) EP-SA-325-102, ECG Use, Step 4.8 (3) EP-SA-325-102, ECG Use, Step 1.1 (4) EP 96-003 - Enhance callout system by correcting deficiencies and capturing time inefficiencies SGS Rev.01

LR-N22-0044 ATTACHMENT 9 EP-SA-325-F2 Rev. 1 - Attachment 2 Alert

EP-SA-325-F2 ATT 2 Pg. 1 of 6 ATTACHMENT 2 ALERT A. CLASSIFICATION

1. CALL communicators to the Control Room.

SM

2. IF a Security Event is in progress, THEN IMPLEMENT the prompt actions of NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0102, EC Response, Attachment 10, prior to classification.

SM

3. If time allows, DIRECT Classification Independent Verification to be performed SM

4. After Classification Independent Verification is obtained:

DECLARE the ALERT (enter the time and date on the ICMF). ______

EC UPDATE the Crew/Facility with the Emergency classification level and potential escalation criteria. ______

EC COMPLETE / APPROVE the ICMF. ______

EC

5. If time allows OBTAIN accuracy peer check of the completed ICMF EC

6. Continue with NOTIFICATION AND ACTIVATION as follows:

EC If not previously performed, ACTIVATE / DIRECT ACTIVATION of ERO Emergency Callout (EP 96-003) EC DIRECT the Primary Communicator to implement ECG Attachment 6 EC DIRECT the Secondary Communicator to implement ECG Attachment 8 for an ALERT EC If not previously performed, VERIFY / DIRECT VERIFICATION of ERO Emergency Callout activation EC IMPLEMENT NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0102, EC Response EC SGS Rev. 01

EP-SA-325-F2 ATT 2 Pg. 2 of 6 INITIAL CONTACT MESSAGE FORM I. THIS IS _____________________, COMMUNICATOR IN THE CONTROL ROOM (NAME) TSC EOF AT THE SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT(s) No.

II. THIS IS NOTIFICATION OF AN ALERT WHICH WAS DECLARED AT ON (Time - 24 HR CLOCK) (DATE)

EAL # DESCRIPTION OF EVENT

}

Any release III. THERE IS A RELEASE IN PROGRESS DUE TO THE EVENT above normal, attributable to the THERE IS NO RELEASE IN PROGRESS DUE TO THE EVENT event. See Basis for examples.

IV. 33 FT. LEVEL WIND DIRECTION (From): WIND SPEED:

(From MET Computer /SPDS) (DEGREES) (MPH)

V. NO PROTECTIVE ACTIONS ARE RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME EC Print/Sign (Approval to Transmit ICMF)

SGS Rev. 01

EP-SA-325-F2 ATT 2 Pg. 3 of 6 SGS Rev. 01

EP-SA-325-F2 ATT 2 Pg. 4 of 6 BASIS - ALERT ICMF Classification Non-Delegable Actions: Actions taken in the process of emergency classification maybe delegated as needed with the exception of the 4 non-delegable actions listed below (1) o Classify emergencies in accordance with the Salem and Hope Creek Event Classification Guides - Includes final determination of the classification and approval of the ICMF o Make decisions to notify and recommend protective actions to offsite agencies o Provide overall direction, control and coordination of PSEG Nuclears Emergency Response o Authorize the expenditure of company funds and commit corporate resources as necessary to implement emergency procedures and/or to mitigate the accident Communicators: Call communicators to the Control Room as soon as possible to provide time for them to respond from the field Independent Verification:

o When the Shift Manager (SM) is the Emergency Coordinator, the Shift Technical Advisor (STA) is responsible to perform an independent verification of the EAL classification. The STA verification does not alleviate the requirement of the SM to make a timely classification.

Should the SM fill the STA role, independent verification of the EAL classification will be delegated to another on-shift SRO, the Independent Assessor.

o Independent verification, while recommended, is not required and should be performed at the SM/ECs discretion as time allows and based on plant conditions. (2)

STA or designee performs Independent Verification for SM SM or designee performs Independent Verification for EDO EDO or designee performs Independent Verification for ERM o During the verification phase begin filling in the ICMF, completing the EAL declaration time once the EC and Independent Verifier have conferred and agree on a classification.

SGS Rev. 01

EP-SA-325-F2 ATT 2 Pg. 5 of 6 Accuracy Peer Check: Have the STA, TSS, SSM or other knowledgeable individual perform an accuracy peer check of the ICMF. The peer check should include:

o verification that the correct form has been used for the classification o review of all applicable fields that have been completed by the SM during completion of the ICMF (date, time, EAL, Description etc.) to ensure data is correct/accurate o EC approval initials have been completed.

Classification Timeliness: Classification must occur after verification and before the 15 minute EAL clock expires. Assessment of an Emergency Condition should be completed in a timely manner, which is considered to be within 15 minutes of when events are known or should have been known. If an EAL specifies a duration time (e.g., loss of annunciators for 15 minutes or longer), the assessment time runs concurrently with the EAL duration time and is the same length. (3)

Rad Release Determination (Salem): Any of the following conditions constitutes a release in progress due to the event:

o Increase in Plant Vent Release Rate (NOT caused by operational transients or ventilation changes) which is caused by the EVENT.

o A Steam Generator rupture which is faulted to the atmosphere (SRV, Atmospheric Vent or Line Break) o Evidence of an UNMONITORED release to atmosphere, examples include:

Primary to Secondary leak and the steam driven feed pump is in service Bypass release from the Aux Building through the Electrical Pen Leakage from the Containment directly to atmosphere after a LOCA Elevated background radiation levels downwind from the station as monitored/reported by Radiation Protection Technician at fence line SGS Rev. 01

EP-SA-325-F2 ATT 2 Pg. 6 of 6 Notification Callout Activation (Alert, SAE, GE):

o Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Emergency Callout Activation (EP Aid-031) is required for an Alert or higher classification.

o Activation maybe delegated to the communicators if available, but must be performed as soon as possible after classification. The SM shall perform the callout if communicators are not available.

o Activate the ERO Emergency Callout system using the posted instructions titled Emergency Callout Activation.

o ERO callout system activation will be confirmed by a return call from the Everbridge system to the Communicators phone. If callout fails, then utilize backup procedures to alert the ERO (EP Aid-032)

References:

(1) Emergency Plan, Section 3.0 - Organization, Paragraph 4.0 - Emergency Direction and Control (2) EP-SA-325-102, ECG Use, Step 4.8 (3) EP-SA-325-102, ECG Use, Step 1.1 (4) EP 96-003 - Enhance callout system by correcting deficiencies and capturing time inefficiencies SGS Rev. 01

LR-N22-0044 ATTACHMENT 10 EP-SA-325-F3 Rev. 1 - Attachment 3 Site Area Emergency

EP-SA-325-F3 ATT 3 Pg. 1 of 6 ATTACHMENT 3 SITE AREA EMERGENCY A. CLASSIFICATION

1. CALL communicators to the Control Room.

SM

2. IF a Security Event is in progress, THEN IMPLEMENT the prompt actions of NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0102, EC Response, Attachment 10, prior to classification.

SM

3. If time allows, DIRECT Classification Independent Verification to be performed SM

4. After Classification Independent Verification is obtained:

DECLARE the SITE AREA EMERGENCY (enter the time and date on the ICMF). ______

EC UPDATE the Crew/Facility with the Emergency classification level and potential escalation criteria. ______

EC COMPLETE / APPROVE the ICMF. ______

EC

5. If time allows OBTAIN accuracy peer check of the completed ICMF EC

6. Continue with NOTIFICATION AND ACTIVATION as follows:

If not previously performed, ACTIVATE / DIRECT ACTIVATION of ERO Emergency Callout (EP 96-003) EC DIRECT the Primary Communicator to implement ECG Attachment 6 EC DIRECT the Secondary Communicator to implement ECG Attachment 8 for a SITE AREA EMERGENCY EC If not previously performed, VERIFY / DIRECT VERIFICATION of ERO Emergency Callout activation EC IMPLEMENT NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0102, EC Response EC SGS Rev. 01

EP-SA-325-F3 ATT 3 Pg. 2 of 6 INITIAL CONTACT MESSAGE FORM I. THIS IS _____________________, COMMUNICATOR IN THE CONTROL ROOM (NAME) TSC EOF AT THE SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT(s) No.

II. THIS IS NOTIFICATION OF AN SITE AREA EMERGENCY WHICH WAS DECLARED AT ON (Time - 24 HR CLOCK) (DATE)

EAL # , ,

DESCRIPTION OF EVENT:

}

Any release III. THERE IS A RELEASE IN PROGRESS DUE TO THE EVENT above normal, attributable to the THERE IS NO RELEASE IN PROGRESS DUE TO THE EVENT event. See Basis for examples.

IV. 33 FT. LEVEL WIND DIRECTION (From): WIND SPEED:

(From MET Computer /SPDS) (DEGREES) (MPH)

V. NO PROTECTIVE ACTIONS ARE RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME EC Print/Sign (Approval to Transmit ICMF)

SGS Rev. 01

EP-SA-325-F3 ATT 3 Pg. 3 of 6 SGS Rev. 01

EP-SA-325-F3 ATT 3 Pg. 4 of 6 BASIS - SAE ICMF Classification Non-Delegable Actions: Actions taken in the process of emergency classification maybe delegated as needed with the exception of the 4 non-delegable actions listed below (1) o Classify emergencies in accordance with the Salem and Hope Creek Event Classification Guides - Includes final determination of the classification and approval of the ICMF o Make decisions to notify and recommend protective actions to offsite agencies o Provide overall direction, control and coordination of PSEG Nuclears Emergency Response o Authorize the expenditure of company funds and commit corporate resources as necessary to implement emergency procedures and/or to mitigate the accident Communicators: Call communicators to the Control Room as soon as possible to provide time for them to respond from the field Independent Verification:

o When the Shift Manager (SM) is the Emergency Coordinator, the Shift Technical Advisor (STA) is responsible to perform an independent verification of the EAL classification. The STA verification does not alleviate the requirement of the SM to make a timely classification.

Should the SM fill the STA role, independent verification of the EAL classification will be delegated to another on-shift SRO, the Independent Assessor.

o Independent verification, while recommended, is not required and should be performed at the SM/ECs discretion as time allows and based on plant conditions. (2)

STA or designee performs Independent Verification for SM SM or designee performs Independent Verification for EDO EDO or designee performs Independent Verification for ERM o During the verification phase begin filling in the ICMF, completing the EAL declaration time once the EC and Independent Verifier have conferred and agree on a classification.

SGS Rev. 01

EP-SA-325-F3 ATT 3 Pg. 5 of 6 Accuracy Peer Check: Have the STA, TSS, SSM or other knowledgeable individual perform an accuracy peer check of the ICMF. The peer check should include:

o verification that the correct form has been used for the classification o review of all applicable fields that have been completed by the SM during completion of the ICMF (date, time, EAL, Description etc.) to ensure data is correct/accurate o EC approval initials have been completed.

Classification Timeliness: Classification must occur after verification and before the 15 minute EAL clock expires. Assessment of an Emergency Condition should be completed in a timely manner, which is considered to be within 15 minutes of when events are known or should have been known. If an EAL specifies a duration time (e.g., loss of annunciators for 15 minutes or longer), the assessment time runs concurrently with the EAL duration time and is the same length. (3)

Rad Release Determination (Salem): Any of the following conditions constitutes a release in progress due to the event:

o Increase in Plant Vent Release Rate (NOT caused by operational transients or ventilation changes) which is caused by the EVENT.

o A Steam Generator rupture which is faulted to the atmosphere (SRV, Atmospheric Vent or Line Break) o Evidence of an UNMONITORED release to atmosphere, examples include:

Primary to Secondary leak and the steam driven feed pump is in service Bypass release from the Aux Building through the Electrical Pen Leakage from the Containment directly to atmosphere after a LOCA Elevated background radiation levels downwind from the station as monitored/reported by Radiation Protection Technician at fence line SGS Rev. 01

EP-SA-325-F3 ATT 3 Pg. 6 of 6 Notification Callout Activation (Alert, SAE, GE):

o Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Emergency Callout Activation (EP Aid-031) is required for an Alert or higher classification.

o Activation maybe delegated to the communicators if available, but must be performed as soon as possible after classification. The SM shall perform the callout if communicators are not available.

o Activate the ERO Emergency Callout system using the posted instructions titled Emergency Callout Activation.

o ERO callout system activation will be confirmed by a return call from the Everbridge system to the Communicators phone. If callout fails, then utilize Backup Emergency Call-Out Activation (EP Aid-032).

References:

(1) Emergency Plan, Section 3.0 - Organization, Paragraph 4.0 - Emergency Direction and Control (2) EP-SA-325-102, ECG Use, Step 4.8 (3) EP-SA-325-102, ECG Use, Step 1.1 (4) EP 96-003 - Enhance callout system by correcting deficiencies and capturing time inefficiencies SGS Rev. 01

LR-N22-0044 ATTACHMENT 11 EP-SA-325-F4 Rev. 2 - Attachment 4 General Emergency

EP-SA-325-F4 ATT 4 Pg. 1 of 9 ATTACHMENT 4 GENERAL EMERGENCY A. CLASSIFICATION

1. CALL communicators to the Control Room.

SM

2. IF a Security Event is in progress, THEN IMPLEMENT the prompt actions of NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0102, EC Response, Attachment 10, prior to classification.

SM

3. If time allows, DIRECT Classification Independent Verification to be performed SM

4. After Classification Independent Verification is obtained:

DECLARE the GENERAL EMERGENCY (enter the time and date on the ICMF). ______

EC UPDATE the Crew/Facility with the Emergency classification level and potential escalation criteria. ______

EC COMPLETE / APPROVE the ICMF. ______

EC

5. If time allows OBTAIN accuracy peer check of the completed ICMF EC

6. Continue with NOTIFICATION AND ACTIVATION as follows:

If not previously performed, ACTIVATE / DIRECT ACTIVATION of ERO Emergency Callout (EP 96-003) EC DIRECT the Primary Communicator to implement ECG Attachment 6 EC DIRECT the Secondary Communicator to implement ECG Attachment 8 for a GENERAL EMERGENCY EC If not previously performed, VERIFY / DIRECT VERIFICATION of ERO Emergency Callout activation EC IMPLEMENT NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0102, EC Response EC SGS Rev. 2

EP-SA-325-F4 ATT 4 Pg. 2 of 9 INITIAL CONTACT MESSAGE FORM I. THIS IS _____________________, COMMUNICATOR IN THE CONTROL ROOM (NAME) TSC EOF AT THE SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT(s) No.

IIa. THIS IS NOTIFICATION OF AN GENERAL EMERGENCY WHICH WAS DECLARED AT ON (Time - 24 HR CLOCK) (DATE)

EAL # , ,

DESCRIPTION OF EVENT:

I I

OR I IIb.

THIS IS NOTIFICATION OF A PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION UPGRADE MADE AT HRS ON (Time - 24 HR CLOCK) (DATE)

Reason for PAR Upgrade:

Any release III. THERE IS A RELEASE IN PROGRESS DUE TO THE EVENT above normal, attributable to the THERE IS NO RELEASE IN PROGRESS DUE TO THE EVENT event. See Basis for examples.

{

IV. 33 FT. LEVEL WIND DIRECTION (From): WIND SPEED:

(From MET Computer /SPDS) (DEGREES) (MPH)

V. Sectors Dist. - Mile WE RECOMMEND EVACUATION AS FOLLOWS WE RECOMMEND SHELTERING AS FOLLOWS WE RECOMMEND MONITOR AND PREPARE AS FOLLOWS WE RECOMMEND THE USE OF KI IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE PROCEDURES EC Print/Sign (Approval to Transmit ICMF)

SGS Rev. 2

EP-SA-325-F4 ATT 4 Pg. 3 of 9 SGS Rev. 2

EP-SA-325-F4 ATT 4 Pg. 4 of 9 BASIS - GE ICMF Classification Non-Delegable Actions: Actions taken in the process of emergency classification maybe delegated as needed with the exception of the 4 non-delegable actions listed below (1) o Classify emergencies in accordance with the Salem and Hope Creek Event Classification Guides - Includes final determination of the classification and approval of the ICMF o Make decisions to notify and recommend protective actions to offsite agencies o Provide overall direction, control and coordination of PSEG Nuclears Emergency Response o Authorize the expenditure of company funds and commit corporate resources as necessary to implement emergency procedures and/or to mitigate the accident Communicators: Call communicators to the Control Room as soon as possible to provide time for them to respond from the field Independent Verification:

o When the Shift Manager (SM) is the Emergency Coordinator, the Shift Technical Advisor (STA) is responsible to perform an independent verification of the EAL classification. The STA verification does not alleviate the requirement of the SM to make a timely classification.

Should the SM fill the STA role, independent verification of the EAL classification will be delegated to another on-shift SRO, the Independent Assessor.

o Independent verification, while recommended, is not required and should be performed at the SM/ECs discretion as time allows and based on plant conditions. (2)

STA or designee performs Independent Verification for SM SM or designee performs Independent Verification for EDO EDO or designee performs Independent Verification for ERM o During the verification phase begin filling in the ICMF, completing the EAL declaration time once the EC and Independent Verifier have conferred and agree on a classification.

SGS Rev. 2

EP-SA-325-F4 ATT 4 Pg. 5 of 9 Accuracy Peer Check: Have the STA, TSS, SSM or other knowledgeable individual perform an accuracy peer check of the ICMF. The peer check should include:

o verification that the correct form has been used for the classification o review of all applicable fields that have been completed by the SM during completion of the ICMF (date, time, EAL, Description etc.) to ensure data is correct/accurate o EC approval initials have been completed Classification Timeliness: Classification must occur after verification and before the 15 minute EAL clock expires. Assessment of an Emergency Condition should be completed in a timely manner, which is considered to be within 15 minutes of when events are known or should have been known. If an EAL specifies a duration time (e.g., loss of annunciators for 15 minutes or longer), the assessment time runs concurrently with the EAL duration time and is the same length. (3)

PAR Upgrades: ECG Attachment 4 is used for declaration of a General Emergency and also for PAR upgrades IAW NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0102 and NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0404. When completing the form for a PAR upgrade, steps not applicable to the PAR upgrade process should be N/Ad as appropriate.

Rad Release Determination (Salem): Any of the following conditions constitutes a release in progress due to the event:

o Increase in Plant Vent Release Rate (NOT caused by operational transients or ventilation changes) which is caused by the EVENT.

o A Steam Generator rupture which is faulted to the atmosphere (SRV, Atmospheric Vent or Line Break) o Evidence of an UNMONITORED release to atmosphere, examples include:

Primary to Secondary leak and the steam driven feed pump is in service Bypass release from the Aux Building through the Electrical Pen Leakage from the Containment directly to atmosphere after a LOCA Elevated background radiation levels downwind from the station as monitored/reported by Radiation Protection Technician at fence line SGS Rev. 2

EP-SA-325-F4 ATT 4 Pg. 6 of 9 Notification Callout Activation (Alert, SAE, GE):

o Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Emergency Callout Activation (EP Aid-031) is required for an Alert or higher classification.

o Activation may be delegated to the communicators if available, but must be performed as soon as possible after classification. The SM shall perform the callout if communicators are not available.

o Activate the ERO Emergency Callout system using the posted instructions titled Emergency Callout Activation.

o ERO callout system activation will be confirmed by a return call from the Everbridge system to the Communicators phone. If callout fails, then utilize Backup Emergency Call-Out Activation (EP Aid-032).

References:

(1) Emergency Plan, Section 3.0 - Organization, Paragraph 4.0 - Emergency Direction and Control (2) EP-SA-325-102, ECG Use, Step 4.8 (3) EP-SA-325-102, ECG Use, Step 1.1 (4) EP 96-003 - Enhance callout system by correcting deficiencies and capturing time inefficiencies SGS Rev. 2

EP-SA-325-F4 ATT 4 Pg. 7 of 9 APPENDIX 1 PREDETERMINED PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS Page 1 of 2 General Emergency?

No No TSC/EOF:

Initial Is PAR from Control Go to PAR Upgrade Procedure PAR? Room?

NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0404 Yes Yes Go to Page 2 GE based on No Is there a Loss of Three No Hostile Action Event Fission Product in Progress affecting Barriers (13 the GE?

Pts.)?

Yes Yes Is R44A or R44B No indicating > 2000 R/Hr?

OR 8.48E+09 uCi/sec (EAL RG1.1) (2)

Yes Initial PARs (1)

RPSA PAR HAB PAR Default PAR (No RPSA)

Evacuate All Sectors 0-5 miles

Shelter All Sectors 0-5 miles

Evacuate All Sectors 0-5 miles Monitor & Prepare All Sectors Monitor & Prepare All Sectors

Evacuate +/- 1 Sector Downwind 5-10 miles _

_ _ _I*_ I_

Shelter All Remaining Sectors 5-10 miles SEE LAST PAGE OF ATTACHMENT TO DETERMINE DOWNWIND SECTORS 5-10 miles 5-10 miles (1) RPSA is a Rapidly Progressing Severe Accident (2) RG1.1 defines a significant release in progress SGS Rev. 2

EP-SA-325-F4 ATT 4 Pg. 8 of 9 APPENDIX 1 PREDETERMINED PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS Page 2 of 2 From Page 1 CONTROL ROOM ONLY Entry Condition:

A Wind Shift has occurred - Consider PAR Upgrade (Start with previous PAR)

Was the Initial PAR No a Hostile Action Event or Default?

Yes No PAR Upgrade Required *RPSA PAR Upgrade Evacuate New Downwind Sectors 5-10 miles Evacuate New Downwind + 1 Sector 5-10 miles Shelter All Remaining Sectors 5-10 miles SEE LAST PAGE OF ATTACHMENT TO DETERMINE DOWNWIND SECTORS

RPSA is a Rapidly Progressing Severe Accident SGS Rev. 2

EP-SA-325-F4 ATT 4 Pg. 9 of 9 APPENDIX 1 (continued)

PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION WORKSHEET WIND DIRECTION PAR AFFECTED SECTORS FROM DEGREES COMPASS DOWNWIND 1 SECTORS 349 - 011 N SSE - S - SSW 011 - 034 NNE S - SSW - SW 034 - 056 NE SSW - SW - WSW 056 - 079 ENE SW - WSW - W 079 - 101 E WSW - W - WNW 101 - 124 ESE W - WNW - NW 124 - 146 SE WNW - NW - NNW 146 - 169 SSE NW - NNW - N 169 - 191 S NNW - N - NNE 191 - 214 SSW N - NNE - NE 214 - 236 SW NNE - NE - ENE 236 - 259 WSW NE - ENE - E 259 - 281 W ENE - E - ESE 281 - 304 WNW E - ESE - SE 304 - 326 NW ESE - SE - SSE 326 - 349 NNW SE - SSE - S NOTE: CONSIDER ADDING A SECTOR TO THE PAR IF THE WIND DIRECTION (FROM) IS WITHIN 3o OF A SECTOR DIVIDING LINE.

10 MILES 349O 011O 326O NORTH 034O NNW NNE NW 5 NE 304O 056O MILES WNW ENE 281O 079O WEST EAST ARTIFICAL ISLAND 101O 259O WSW ESE 236O SE 124O SW SSW SSE 214O SOUTH 146O 191O 169O SGS Rev. 2

LR-N22-0044 ATTACHMENT 12 EP-SA-325-F24 Rev. 1 - Attachment 24 Unusual Event (Common Site)

EP-SA-325-F24 ATT 24 Pg. 1 of 7 ATTACHMENT 24 UNUSUAL EVENT (COMMON SITE)

NOTE ONLY one Shift Manager (SM) is required to declare this event and assume the responsibilities of Emergency Coordinator (EC). The other SM should perform support duties in accordance with NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0101, Actions Required at Unaffected Station.

CAUTION In the event of offsite toxic gas release affecting the site, evacuation of non-essential personnel takes precedence over notifications.

I. COMMON SITE EVENT ASSESSMENT/ EC DETERMINATION A. NOTIFICATION OF HOPE CREEK SHIFT MANAGER

1. CONTACT the Hope Creek SM (NETS 5234, DID 3027 or 3059) and BRIEF on the specific circumstances as follows:

a. SHARE information about the externally initiated event in progress.

b. OBTAIN agreement on the Unusual Event classification.

c. DETERMINE which SM will assume EC responsibilities.

Emergency Coordinator:

2. IF the Hope Creek SM is the EC, THEN:

a. IMPLEMENT NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0101, Actions Required at the Unaffected Station.

b. CONTACT the Salem Operations Manager, Emergency Duty Officer and Salem NRC resident and PROVIDE them with a briefing on the UE.

c. ASSIST the Hope Creek SM as needed.

d. EXIT this attachment.

SGS Rev. 01

EP-SA-325-F24 ATT 24 Pg. 2 of 7 II. CLASSIFICATION and NOTIFICATION A. CLASSIFICATION

1. CALL communicators to the Control Room.

SM

2. IF a Security Event is in progress, THEN IMPLEMENT the prompt actions of NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0102, EC Response, Attachment 10, prior to classification.

SM

3. If time allows, DIRECT Classification Independent Verification to be performed EC

4. After Classification Independent Verification is obtained:

DECLARE the UNUSUAL EVENT (enter time and date on ICMF) ______

EC UPDATE Crew/Facility with the Emergency Classification and potential escalation criteria ______

EC COMPLETE / APPROVE the ICMF ______

EC

5. If time allows OBTAIN accuracy peer check of the completed ICMF EC

6. Continue with NOTIFICATION AND ACTIVATION as follows:

NOTE Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Emergency Callout Activation is required for an Unusual Event based on a Security Event.

Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Emergency Callout Activation is optional and may be implemented at the discretion of the Emergency Coordinator (EC) for all other Unusual Events.

If desired, ACTIVATE / DIRECT ACTIVATION of ERO Emergency Callout (EP 96-003) EC DIRECT the Primary Communicator to implement ECG Attachment 6 EC DIRECT the Secondary Communicator to implement ECG Attachment 8 for an UNUSUAL EVENT EC If ACTIVATION was performed, VERIFY / DIRECT VERIFICATION of ERO Emergency Callout activation EC IMPLEMENT NC.EP-EP.ZZ-0102, EC Response SGS Rev. 01

EP-SA-325-F24 ATT 24 Pg. 3 of 7 EC INITIAL CONTACT MESSAGE FORM I. THIS IS _________________________, COMMUNICATOR IN THE CONTROL ROOM (NAME)

AT THE SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION.

II. THIS IS NOTIFICATION OF A COMMON SITE UNUSUAL EVENT AFFECTING BOTH SALEM AND HOPE CREEK WHICH WAS DECLARED AT ON (Time - 24 HR CLOCK) (DATE)

EAL # DESCRIPTION OF EVENT

}

Any release III. THERE IS A RELEASE IN PROGRESS DUE TO THE EVENT above normal, attributable to the event. See Basis THERE IS NO RELEASE IN PROGRESS DUE TO THE EVENT for examples.

IV. 33 FT. LEVEL WIND DIRECTION (From): WIND SPEED:

(From MET Computer /SPDS) (DEGREES) (MPH)

V. NO PROTECTIVE ACTIONS ARE RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME EC Print/Sign (Approval to Transmit ICMF)

SGS Rev. 01

EP-SA-325-F24 ATT 24 Pg. 4 of 7 SGS Rev. 01

EP-SA-325-F24 ATT 24 Pg. 5 of 7 BASIS - COMMON SITE UE ICMF Classification Non-Delegable Actions: Actions taken in the process of emergency classification maybe delegated as needed with the exception of the 4 non-delegable actions listed below (1) o Classify emergencies in accordance with the Salem and Hope Creek Event Classification Guides - Includes final determination of the classification and approval of the ICMF o Make decisions to notify and recommend protective actions to offsite agencies o Provide overall direction, control and coordination of PSEG Nuclears Emergency Response o Authorize the expenditure of company funds and commit corporate resources as necessary to implement emergency procedures and/or to mitigate the accident Communicators: Call communicators to the Control Room as soon as possible to provide time for them to respond from the field Independent Verification:

o When the Shift Manager (SM) is the Emergency Coordinator, the Shift Technical Advisor (STA) is responsible to perform an independent verification of the EAL classification. The STA verification does not alleviate the requirement of the SM to make a timely classification.

Should the SM fill the STA role, independent verification of the EAL classification will be delegated to another on-shift SRO, the Independent Assessor.

o Independent verification, while recommended, is not required and should be performed at the SM/ECs discretion as time allows and based on plant conditions. (2)

STA or designee performs Independent Verification for SM SM or designee performs Independent Verification for EDO EDO or designee performs Independent Verification for ERM o During the verification phase begin filling in the ICMF, completing the EAL declaration time once the EC and Independent Verifier have conferred and agree on a classification.

SGS Rev. 01

EP-SA-325-F24 ATT 24 Pg. 6 of 7 Accuracy Peer Check: Have the STA, Primary Communicator or other knowledgeable individual perform an accuracy peer check of the ICMF. The peer check should include:

o verification that the correct form has been used for the classification o review of all applicable fields that have been completed by the SM during completion of the ICMF (date, time, EAL, Description etc.) to ensure data is correct/accurate o SM approval initials have been completed Classification Timeliness: Classification must occur after verification and before the 15 minute EAL clock expires. Assessment of an Emergency Condition should be completed in a timely manner, which is considered to be within 15 minutes of when events are known or should have been known. If an EAL specifies a duration time (e.g., loss of annunciators for 15 minutes or longer), the assessment time runs concurrently with the EAL duration time and is the same length. (3)

Rad Release Determination (Salem): Any of the following conditions constitutes a release in progress due to the event:

o Increase in Plant Vent Release Rate (NOT caused by operational transients or ventilation changes) which is caused by the EVENT.

o A Steam Generator rupture which is faulted to the atmosphere (SRV, Atmospheric Vent or Line Break) o Evidence of an UNMONITORED release to atmosphere, examples include:

Primary to Secondary leak and the steam driven feed pump is in service Bypass release from the Aux Building through the Electrical Pen Leakage from the Containment directly to atmosphere after a LOCA Elevated background radiation levels downwind from the station as monitored/reported by Radiation Protection Technician at fence line SGS Rev. 01

EP-SA-325-F24 ATT 24 Pg. 7 of 7 Notification Callout Activation: UE o Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Emergency Callout Activation (EP Aid-031) is required for an Unusual Event based on a Security Event. Activation is optional for all other Unusual Events and may be implemented at the discretion of the Emergency Coordinator (EC).

o Activation maybe delegated to the communicators if available, but must be performed as soon as possible after classification. The SM shall perform the callout if communicators are not available.

o Activate the ERO Emergency Callout system using the posted instructions titled Emergency Callout Activation.

o ERO callout system activation will be confirmed by a return call from the Everbridge system to the Communicators phone. If callout fails, then utilize Backup Emergency Call-Out Activation (EP Aid-032).

References:

(1) Emergency Plan, Section 3.0 - Organization, Paragraph 4.0 - Emergency Direction and Control (2) EP-SA-325-102, ECG Use, Step 4.8 (3) EP-SA-325-102, ECG Use, Step 1.1 (4) EP 96-003 - Enhance callout system by correcting deficiencies and capturing time inefficiencies SGS Rev. 01

LR-N22-0044, Emergency Plan Document Revisions Implemented November, 2021

Contents

Text

Subject:

SUMMARY

Title:

SUMMARY

Title:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

SUMMARY

Title:

SUMMARY

Title:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

Navigation menu

LR-N22-0044, Emergency Plan Document Revisions Implemented November, 2021

Text

Subject:

SUMMARY

Title:

SUMMARY

Title:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

SUMMARY

Title:

SUMMARY

Title:

References:

References:

References:

References:

References:

Navigation menu

Search