L-86-466, Forwards Payment for Civil Penalty Associated W/Enforcement Action EA-86-038.Comments & Clarifications Re NRC Review of Util Response to Original Notice of Violation Encl

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Payment for Civil Penalty Associated W/Enforcement Action EA-86-038.Comments & Clarifications Re NRC Review of Util Response to Original Notice of Violation Encl
ML20214D108
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/13/1986
From: Woody C
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Taylor J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
References
EA-86-038, EA-86-38, L-86-466, NUDOCS 8611210361
Download: ML20214D108 (2)


Text

P. o. BOX 14000. JUNO BE ACH. FL 33408 g,

FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY NOVEMBER 13 1986' L-86-466 DC[

Mr. James M. Taylor, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555

Dear Mr. Taylor:

Re: Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 Order imposing Civil Penalty (EA 86-38)

We appreciate your review and reconsideration of the proposed civil penalty associated with EA 86-38.

While we regret that your review did not conclude that total mitigation was warranted, our intent and effort are directed toward assuring that appropriate corrective actions are in place and working. Accordingly, attached is FPL Check No. 56770 to satisfy the imposed monetary penalty in full.

Also provided for information are several comments and clarifications regarding '

the NRC Staff's review of our response to the original Notice of Violation. These comments are provided in the attachment to this letter.

Should you or your stoff have any questions on this information, please contact us.

Very truly yours,

(.

C. O.

'T y

Group ice President Nuclear Energy COW /RG/gp Attachments

\\

RC3/006/l 8611210361 861113 [ '

PDR ADOCK 05000250 PEOPLE. . SERVING PEOPLE G PDR ,

Re: Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 Order imposina Civil Penalty (EA 86-38) i ATTACHMENT The following comments and clarifications concern the NRC's response to FPL's

original response (L-86-215) to the Notice of Violation.

i i Violation A

, NRC Response:

I "When interviewed by the inspector, the I&C technician stated that he was not aware of the higher radiation levels associated with the TIP work."

I Also, "The I&C technicion also stated that he was introduced to the Health Physics technician who was to provide job coverage, but that a pre-job i

briefing did not take place."

i FPL Comment:

  • FPL has a statement, prepared and signed by the HP technicion, stating that a pre-job briefing did take place. The statement includes explicit details concerning potential dose rates, contamination levels, airborne radioactivity, and resultant protective clothing, and respiratory protection criteria.

J Violation B.2 and B.3

NRC Response
' "...the assigned l&C supervisor who assigned the two technicians, one of
whom was to withdraw the TIP, should have taken overt oction to ensure that proper identifications were made prior to beginning work."

l FPL Comments

! The l&C supervisor did not assign the second l&C technician. The scope of

[ the job, as identified on the PWO, was to troubleshoot only. After i troubleshooting, the I&C technician should have notified OC and his supervision. Unknown to the'I&C supervisor, the original l&C technician requested help from a second l&C technician to withdraw the detector.

l l

RG3/006/2

  • -._----- . , , mm.---- , - . - - . - .. - ,.. ---, .., e-m. ,~~ , - - - - . - - . . . - . . ,m, , . - - .,--.my--.. -- . . . - , .-._..2 -,- -