IR 05000416/1982033
| ML20053D839 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Grand Gulf  |
| Issue date: | 05/10/1982 |
| From: | Barr K, Collins T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20053D835 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-416-82-33, NUDOCS 8206070373 | |
| Download: ML20053D839 (5) | |
Text
,__
.
- gro UNITED STATES q',
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.'
n
$
'E REGION 11
'i
'
.
[
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 o,%*****[
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 D
,
'
MAY 121982
'
"
\\
Report Nos. 50-416/82-33 Licensee: Mississippi Power and Light Company Jackson, MS 39205 s
. Facility Name: Grand Gulf 1 Docket Nos. 50-416 s
,
,
'
License Nos. CPPR-118
Inspection at Grand Gulf sit near Port Gibson, MS,
/
'
Sf7)h7 Inspector:
a
,
T. R. Collins /J i
dat6 Signed
-
m S / hod 2-Approved by:
-,
__.e K. P. B rr, SRtto hief CatefSigned
'
Technical Inspection Branch Division of Engineering and Technical Proy, ams -
f
'
(
-
SUMMARY
.
Inspection on April 19-22, 1982 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 32 inspector-hours on site in the areas of Tiquid radioactive waste systems, solid radioactive processing and disposal, preoperational test procedure review, radioactive waste liquid effluent
.
monitors, post accident sampling system, radioactive material receipt, control and inventory, special nuclear material control, neutron survey instrumentation,
'
'
health physics procedure review, special radiation monitoring equipment and HEPA filter systems.
Results Of the.11 areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
,
\\
8206070373 820512 PDR ADOCK 05000416
r-
.
<? -
^
REPORT DETAILS
..
1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
-
- C. K. McCoy, Plant Manager J'
- L. Stuart, Assistant Plant Manager
- G. A. Johnson, Operations Superintendent
- M. A. Lacey, QA Consultant 1-
!
- J.' C. Bell, QA Representative
,
- R. R. Weedon, Chen/ Rad Construction Superintendent
[
R. L. Shaddix, Radwaste Supervisor J. W. Yelverton, Quality Assurance Supervisor D. F. Mahoney, Quality Assurance Representative
,
R. D. Brown, Chemistry Supervisor K. L. Walker, Reactor Eng eneer D. O'Brien, Startup Test Engineer R. M. Paley, Startup Test Engineer
'
A. J. Malone, Technical Engineer Other licensee employees contacted included eight affice personnel.
NRC Resident Inspector
- D. E. Scott, Resident Inspector
.
- Attended exit interview
'
2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on April 22, 1982, with those persons indicated in paragraph I above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
.
t l
4.
Unresolved Items I
l Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
.
!
5.
Liquid Radioactive Waste Systems
,
!
l The inspector reviewed the preoperational test results for the following
'
liquid radioactive waste systems which are required to be completed as a i
part of Phase I testing:
i i
i i
- -
.
..
-
.
_ _ _.
_._, _
-
_.-- _ _ --_.- - --- _ -
- _
- _ -__
.-
-
.
a.
SG17-PT01 -
Liquid Radwaste System (Equipment Drains) Pre-Op Test b.
SG17-PT03 -
Liquid Radwaste System (Floor Drain) Pre-Op Test c.
SG17-PT04 -
Liquid Radwaste System (Reactor Water Clean Up) Pre-Op Test
-
d.
D17-PT01 Liquid Process Radiation Monitoring Pre-Op Test
-
The test results indicate the system will support plant operations and the system meets acceptance criteria.
The inspector also reviewed SG17-PT05, Liquid Radwaste System (Discharge System) Pre-Op Test Procedure which would demonstrate the ability to trans-fer processed liquid waste from the floor drain or equipment drain system to the discharge basin. The inspector concluded that the pre-op test procedure -
appeared to be adequate; however, the results of the test will be reviewed during a subsequent inspection (82-33-01).
6.
Solid Radwaste Processing and Disposal The inspector reviewed the preoperational test results for SG17-PT02, Solid Radwaste Handling System, which is required to be completed as a part of Phase I testing. The test results indicate the system will support plant
'
operations and the system meets acceptance criteria.
The inspector also reviewed the approved purchase order issued to contract a mobile cement solidification system with Chem-Nuclear System, Inc., (CNSI).
This system will not be required for part of the Phase I testing; however, the system should be installed and operational prior exceeding 5% power operation.
!
7.
Radwaste Tank Volume Verification
-
l The f espector reviewed the test results and test method of the following
'
radwas'te holding tanks:
I
.
~
a.
Equipment Drain Collector Tanks A and B l
b.
Floor Drain Collector Tank c.
Waste Surge Tanks A and B
,
d.
Equipment Drain Sample Tanks A and B
!
e.
Floor Drain Sample Tanks A and B f.
Evaporator Bottom Tanks A and B
,
g.
Distillate Sample Tanks A and B h.
Miscellaneous Chemical Tank
!
i.
Regeneration Solution Collector Tanks A and B
'
j.
Spent Resin Tank k.
Reactor Water Clean Up Phase Separator Tanks A and B
,
e
- - -,., -
~,-,w
,,
,,,w-.
- -,.
.-,m,
, -., - +
,.,-,-,,-e--e--g.----n..
---. - - - --,
- - - -,,...-,,
y
,.-.. -, --,
r
.
.
.
The inspector concluded the test results appeared to be adequate and had no further questions.
8.
Preoperational Test Procedures Review The inspector reviewed the following pre-op test procedures which appeared to meet the appropriate FSAR requirements:
a.
021-PT01 -
Area Radiation Monitoring System b.
D23-PT01 -
Drywell Radiation Monitoring System c.
017-PT02 -
Off-Gas Radiation Monitoring System d.
017-PT03 -
Ventillation Radiation Monitoring System e.
D17-PT04 -
Liquid Process Radiation Monitoring System 9.
Radwaste Liquid Ef fluent Monitor The inspector reviewed the initial calibration results of the radwaste liquid effluent monitor (J007) as required by Surveillance Procedure, 06-CH-5D17-R-0027.
The results achieved appeared to be adequate and the inspector had no further questions.
10.
Post Accident Sampling System FSAR Section 18.1.27, NUREG-0737 and Safety Evaluation Report (SER) 0831 r+ quires the post accident sampling system to be installed and in operation prior to fuel loading.
The i nspector discussed this requirement with licensee management and presently the licensee is negotiating a deferment-with NRR licensing to install this system high range effluent monitor (SPING) prior to 5*J ;ower. The inspector informed licensee management this would be left as an open item until official correspondence has been received and reviewed from NRR (82-33-02).
The inspector also noted that the sample lines, on the 93 foot elevation of the Unit 1 Turbine Building, going to and from the post accident sampling system (liquid) appeared not adequately shielded. A licensee representative informed the inspector that this problem had previously been identified by the ALARA Committee. The inspector reviewed the ALARA Committee minutes and determined this problem was under review.
A Technical Work Request (TWR)
has been issued to review this problem; however, no conclusion has been determined.
The inspector informed licensee management this would be reviewed upor, a subsequent inspection (82-33-03).
11.
Radioactive Material Receipt, Control and Inventory The inspector reviewed Radiation Protection Procedure, 01-5-08-06, Radio-active Material Control for the adequacy of control and inventory of licensed radioactive material. The inspector informed the cognizant super-visor that this procedure was not adequate in that it dces not indicate when appropriate data sheets will be completed when receiving licensed radioac-tive material. On April 20, 1982, the licensee received Antimony-124 i
~
.
..
start-up sources and these sources had not been properly documented for the receipt, control and inventory as of April 22, 1982. The cognizant super-visor agreed the procedure needed to be revised and the inspector stated that the procedure revision would be reviewed upon a subsequent inspection (82-33-04).
12.
Special Nuclear Material Inventory and Transfer Control The inspector reviewed the initial special nuclear material (SNM) inventory of October 1981 and the first six months inventory of February 1982, as required by Special Nuclear Material Inventory and Transfer Control Proce-dure, 01-5-06-15.
The inspector concluded that the results appeared to be adequate and had no further questions.
13.
Neutron Survey Instruments The inspector noted in previous inspections that the licensee haJ ordered
'
two (2) 500 pCi, AmBe neutron sources to response check neutron survey instruments prior to u3e.
These survey instruments will be required for use during the Phase I and Phase 11 start up test program.
The inspector was informed that the neutron sources have been received. The inspector had no further questions.
14.
Health Physics Procedures The inspector reviewed the following Health Physics Procedu es which appeared to be adequate for plant operation:
a.
Administrative Procedure, 01-S-08-07, Radiation Control Instrumentation b.
Radiation Protection Procedure, 08-S-01-64, Radioactive Material Shipment and Transport 15.
Defective Radiation Monitoring Equipment The licensee has contracted with Eberline Instrument Corporation to start-up and verify that the Special Particulate Iodine Noble Gas (SPING) System is
, free of any defective microprocessor circuit boards and other equipment failures.
The inspector concluded this appeared to be adequate and had no further questions.
16.
High Ef ficiency Filter Systems The licensee has completed the loading of the required high efficiency filters (charcoal and/or HEPA) in the appropriate filter systems and the in place filter testing has been completed.
The test results of the required in place filter test have not been received from the contractor who performed the test.
The inspector stated these results will be reviewed upon a subsequent inspection (82-33-05).
!
l