IR 05000416/1982003
| ML20053A873 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Grand Gulf  |
| Issue date: | 03/05/1982 |
| From: | Huffman G, Jenkins G, Perrotti D, Stansberry W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20053A867 | List: |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0654, RTR-NUREG-654 50-416-82-03, 50-416-82-3, NUDOCS 8205270379 | |
| Download: ML20053A873 (18) | |
Text
8
%
UNITED STATES
8'
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
$
E REGION 11
o
" 01 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100
.
ATLANTA, G EORGIA 30303 o
.....
Report flo. 50-416/82-03 Licensee:
ftississippi Power and Light Company P. O. Box 1640 Jackson, iiississippi 39205 Facility flame: Grand Gulf fluclear Station, Unit 1 Docket flo. : 50-416 License flo.: CPPR-118 Appraisal at Grand Gulf Unit I site near Port Gibson, iiississippi Inspectors:
h S' #7 D. J Perrotti(TeamLfder)
Date Signed
$~5"$ 2 W.
. Stansb rr
/
Date Signed 3-5-SL
.
G. Hu f fman
Date Signed Accompanying Person e.1
- . Co, bit, W. Herrington, U. Snell 6M b 3d
Approved by:'6' R. Jer}kf'ns, Section Chief,
-
-
-
Date Signed EPOS D wision SUMMARY Inspection on January 5-8, 1982 Areas Inspected This special, announced appraisal involved 210 inspector-hours onsite and offsite in the performance of an Emergency Preparedness Implementation Appraisal, including administration, emergency organization, training and retraining, emergency facilities and equipment, procedures, coordination with offsite groups, drills and exercises, and walk-throughs.
Results In the areas inspected, no violation or deviations were identified. One appraisal deficient.y was identified in the following area: Augmentation of Onsite Emergency Organization (Section 2.2).
8205270
.
.
TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION DETAILS 1.0 Administration 2.0 Emergency Organization 2.1 Onsite Organization 2.2 Augmentation Organization 3.0 Training / Retraining 3.1 Program Establishment 3.2 Program Implementation 4.0 Emergency Facilities and Equipment 4.1 Emergency Facilities 4.1.1 Assessment Facilities 4.1.2 Protective Facilities 4.1.3 Expanded Support Facilities 4.1.4 News Center 4.2 Emergency Equipment 4.2.1 Assessmer.t Equipment 4.2.2 Protective Equipment 4.2.3 Communications 4.2.4 Damage Control / Corrective Action 4.2.5 Reserve Emergency Supplies and Equipment 4.2.6 Transportation 5.0 Procedures 5.1 General Content and Format 5.2 Emergency, Alarm and Abnormal Occurrence Procedures 5.3 Implementing Instructions 5.4 Implementing Procedures 5.4.1 Notifications 5.4.2 Assessment Actions 5.4.3 Protective Actions 5.4.4 Security During Emergencies 5.4.5 Repair / Corrective Actions 5.4.6 Recovery 5.4.7 Public Information
.
.
5.5 Supplementary Procedures 5.5.1 Inventory, Operational Check and Calibration of Emergency Facilities and Equipment 5.5.2 Drills and Exercises 5.5.3 Review, Revision, and Distribution of Emergency Plan and Procedures 5.5.4 Audits of Emergency Preparedness 6.0 Coordination with Offsite Groups 6.1 Offsite Agencies 6.2 General Public 6.3 News Media 7.0 Drills, Exercises and Walk-Throughs 7.1 Drill and Exercise Program Implementation 7.2 Walk-Through Observations 8.0 Exit Interview 9.0 Persons Contacted 9.1 MP&L Personnel 9.2 Other Organizations 9.3 NRC a
, _.
_. _.
.
.
INTRODllCTION The purpose of this special appraisal was to perform a comprehensive evaluation of the applicant's Emergency Preparedness Program. This appraisal included an evaluation of the adequacy and effectiveness of areas for which explicit regulatory requirements may not currently exist. The appraisal effort was directed towards evaluating the applicant's capability and performance rather than the identification of specific items of noncompliance.
The appraisal scope and findings were summarized on January 8,1982, with those persons indicated in Section 9 of this report.
See Section 8 of this report for details of the exit meeting.
l I
!
l l
.
i l
i
_. _ _
.
.
.
DETAILS 1.0 ADMINISTRATION 1.1-1.4 Responsibility Assigned, Authority, Coordination, Selection and Qualifications The administration of the Emergency Preparedness Program was reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1) and (16); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV. A; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II. A and P.
The overall responsibility for implementation of the emergency planning effort has been assigned to the Emergency Planning Coordinator, who reports to the Corporate Health Physicist.
The responsibilities of the Emergency Planning Coordinator include, but are not limited to, ensuring coordination of the Grand
,
Gulf Emergency Plan (Plan) with State and local plans; ensuring that the Emergency Plan Procedures (EPP) are coordinated and interface properly with Administrative, Security, Radiation Control and Training Procedures; assisting in coordinating emergency plan training, coordinating drills and exercises, review and updating of the Plan, providing for maintenance and inventory of emergency equipment and supplies; and ensuring that all elements of the total emergency organizations (MP&L, State, local) are informed of revisions to the Plan.
The Grand Gulf Nuclear Station (GGNS) Chemistry and Radiation Control (Chem Rad)
Superintendent is responsible for coordinating the site aspects of emergency planning.
The Chem Rad Superintendent reports directly to the Assistant Plant Manager, and, as a member of the Plant Safety Review Committee (PSRC), has direct input to emergency planning at the GGNS.
Discussion with the Chem Rad Superintendent revealed that because his primary responsibilities for plant chemistry and radiation protection consumed all of his time the job of coordinating the aspects of emergency planning at the site has, in the recent past, been redelegated to various individuals. The auditor noted that there was little, if any, continuity in these reassignments.
Discussions with those individuals responsible for the planning effort within the applicant's organization indicated that the individuals possessed an under-standing of the principles involved in developing plans and procedures, that these individuals have been selected according to criteria established by the applicant's management and that these individuals have been provided knowledge of the emergency planning area through the individual's normal responsibilities, seminars and meetings held by various industry groups.
Based on the above findings, this portion of the applicant's program appears to be acceptable. However, the following should be considered for improvement:
(1) An Emergency rianning Coordinator should be appointed at the site with primary duties involving the coordination of all aspects of the Emergency Preparedness Program.
This individual should have an input to routine coordinating events such as budget meetings, plant safety review committee meetings, etc. (50-416/82-03-01)
_
- - -.
.. -
. - _ _ -, -
-_
__
.
.
,
2.0 EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION 2.1 Onsite Organization The Onsite Emergency Organization was reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1) and (2): 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Pargaraph IV. A; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II. A and B.
The auditor reviewed Section 5 of the Plan and discussed the Onsite Emergency Organization with MP&L representatives.
An initial onshif t and an augmented emergency response organization has been established and is discussed in Section 5.4 of the Plan.
Table 5-1 of the Plan identifies the individuals responsible for the major functional areas of the initial Emergency Response Organization by title. Because of the status of the training program (see Section 3.0) inter-views with the members of the Onsite Emergency Organization were not conducted.
Based on the above findings, the adequacy of this area will be reviewed during a future inspection. (50-416/82-03-02)
2.2 Augmentation Organization The augmentation organization was reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1) and (2): 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Pagargaph IV. A; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II. A and B.
The Onsite Emergency Organization is augmented by assigned personnel from the corporate staff located in Jackson, Mississippi.
The Offsite Emergency Organization, which is described in Section 5.5 of the Plan, is under the direction of the Offsite Emergency Coordinator (Assistant Vice President, Nuclear Production). Corporate Emergency Plan Procedure, CEPP-06, Rev. 1, describes the responsibilities of the key members of the Offsite Emergency Organization. In the avent of an emergency requiring activation of the Plan, the Emergency Director (Plant Manager or designee) is responsible for activating the Offsite Emergency Organization. The auditor reviewed the CEPPs and discussed the roles of and interfaces between the onsite and offsite organizations with key members of the Off site Emergency Organization.
The auditor interviewed the Offsite Emergency Coordinator, Radiation Emergency Manager, Technical and Engineering Support Manager, Emergency Planning Coordinator and one Communicator.
The discussions indicated that these members of the Offsite Emergency Organization have an understanding of the general functional areas in which they would be expected to perform.
The augmentation times for the Offsite Emergency Organization were discussed with MP&L representatives.
The augmentation capabilities described in Table 5-1 of the Plan do not meet the recommended staffing guidance of 30 and 60 minute augmentation times expressed in Table B-1 of NUREG-0654.
This matter was addressed by the staff in the GGNS Safety Evaluation Report (NUREG-0831, September 1981) and was included as an unresolved item in Supplement 1 to the Safety Evaluation Report, November 1981.
Correspondence from MP&L to the NRC, dated October 28, 1981, indicated that several key emergency management positions could be filled within 30 minutes of emergency declaration by persons living closer to GGNS. When the auditor asked which key positions, by title, could be filled within 30 and 60 minutes, MP&L representatives declined to identify the
-
_
.
names or titles of those individuals. Table 5-1 of the Plan specifies augmenta-tion times of 60 and 90 minutes for all positions. This matter was discussed further during the exit interview with MP&L corporate representatives (see Section 8.0).
Based on the above findings, the following deficiency must be corrected to achieve an adequate program. The augmentation times for supporting the intial response capability do not meet the specific staffing guidance expressed in Table B-1 of NUREG-0654, and the applicant has not submitted an acceptable al ternative.
(50-416/82-03-03)
3.0 EMERGENCY PLAN TRAINING / RETRAINING 3.1-3.2 Program Established / Implementation The Emergency Training Program was reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(15) and (16); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.F.; and criteria in NUREG-0654, Section 11.0.
The onsite Emergency Training Program of GGNS is described in Section 5.2.11 and 8 of the Plan and EPP-23. The Emergency Preparedness Training Program is described in Draft EPP-21. Offsite Emergency Preparedness Training is described in CEPP-07.
A review of the above documents and discussions with training personnel indicated that there is no formally documented and approved Emergency Plan Training /
Retraining Program with implementing procedures and lesson plans. Approximately 38% of the Emergency Preparedness Training has been conducted.
Based on the above findings, the adequacy of this area of the applicant's program could not be determined and this area will be reviewed during a future inspec-tion.
(50-416/82-03-04)
4.0 EMERGENCY FACILITIES AND EOUIPMENT 4.1 Emergency Facilities 4.1.1 Assessment Facilities 4.1.1.1-4.1.1.4 Emergency Response Facilities (ERF)
The ERF includes the Control Room, Technical Support Center (TSC), Operations Support Center (OSC), Emergency Operations Facility (E0F) and the Corporate Emergency Center (CEC). These facilities were to be reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(8); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.E; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II. G and H.
The auditor determined that this area was incomplete and no evaluation was perfonned at this time by request of the applicant. The auditor determined that the OSC is being set up as a permanent facility while the TSC and E0F appeared to be interim facilities.
The auditor discussed the CEC with MP&L representatives and inspected this facility which is located in the Electric Building in Jackson, MS. The CEC will be used by MP&L upper management personnel as a central place for gathering information concerning the status of the emergency. The CEC has also been specified as the assembly area for the Offsite Emergency Organization personnel in preparation for their being dispatched to the interim EOF, During a tour of the corporate facilities the auditor noted that the emergency environmental
.
monitoring equipment kits, located in the technical library, have not been included in the quarterly inventory and inspection program. This matter is included in Section 4.2.1.1 of this report.
'
Based on the above findings, the adequacy of this area of the applicant's program could not be determined and this area will be reviewed during a future inspection. (50-416/82-03-05)
4.1.1.5-4.1.1.8 Post Accident Sampling and Analysis Post accident sampling and analysis involves coolant samples (4.1.1.5), con-l tainment air samples (4.1.1.6), gas and particulate effluent samples (4.1.1.7),
and the liquid effluent samples (4.1.1.8).
The facilities and equipment available for post accident sampling and analysis were to be evaluated against 10 CFR 50.47(b)(8), 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.E, and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.I.
However, the eauipment for sampling and analysis was not fully installed, nor had acceptance tests been conducted on any of the sampling equipment.
Based on the above findings, the adequacy of this area of the applicant's program could not be determined and this area will be reviewed during a future inspection. (50-416/82-06)
4.1.1.9 Offsite Laboratorie_s The area of offsite laboratories was to be reviewed with respect to the require-ments of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(8); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.E; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.H.
The auditor determined that this area was incom-plete and no evaluation was performed at this time by request of the applicant.
This area will be reviewed during a future inspection. (50-416/82-03-07)
4.1.2 Protective Facilities 4.1.2.1 Assembly Areas The assembly areas were to be reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(8): 10 CFR 50, Appendix E,
Paragraph IV.E; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.J.
The auditor determined that this area was incomplete and no evaluation was performed at this time by request of the applicant. This area will be reviewed during a future inspection. (50-416/82-03-08)
4.1.2.2 Medical Treatment The facilities and equipment available for medical treatment were to be evaluated with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(12); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.E; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.J and L.
The auditor determined that plant first aid training is incomplete, medical treatment procedures have not been approved, ard that medical supplies and equipment are not as yet onsite.
Based on the above finding, the adequacy of this area of the applicant's program could not be determined and this area will be reviewed during a future inspec-tion. (50-416/82-03-09)
!
, - - - - _ _
_
, _ _.
. _. _. _ - -
_
,
-
.
- -. -, _..
- _.. _,
.-.---
_
.
4.1.2.3 Decontamination Facilities Decontamination facilities were to be evaluated with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(11):
10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.E; and NUREG-0654,Section II.H.
The auditor determined that the decontamination area is under-going construction and no equipment or supplies were found.
Based on the above findings, the adequacy of this area of the applicant's pro-gram could not be determined and this area will be reviewed during a future inspection. (50-416/82-03-10)
,
4.1.3 Expanded Support Facility The expanded support facility was to be reviewed with respect to the require-ments of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(13); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV. E; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.C.
The auditor determined that this area was incomplete and no evaluation was performed at this time by request of the appli-cant. This area will be reviewed during a future inspection. (50-416/82-03-11)
4.1.4 Emergency News Center The emergency news center was to be reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(7); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.E; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.G.
The auditor determined that this area was incomplete and no evaluation was performed at this time by request of the applicant. This area will be reviewed during a future inspect.or (50-416/82-03-12)
4.2 Emergency Equipment 4.2.1 Assessment Equipment 4.2.1.1 Kits and Survey Instruments Kits and survey instruments were to be reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 f rR 50.47(b)(9); 10 CFR 50 Appendix E, Paragraph IV.E; and criteria in NUREG-0654 Section II.H and I.
The applicant has reserved pre positioned supplies and survey instruments at specified locations for emergency use.
Emergency equipment locations were as specified in the available procedures.
The kits and storage lockers examined (OSC, TSC, EOF, Site Access Point (SAP)) did not contain adequate supplies and equipment for rescue, measurement and/or assessment actions.
For example, the SAP-EOF kits lacked protective clothing and none of the inspected kits contained
,
dosimeters or calibrated radiation measurement instruments.
In addition, kit inventories have not been finalized, and the emergency environmental monitoring kits have not been included in the inventory program.
Based on the above findings the adequacy of this area of the applicant's pro-gram could not be determined and this area will be reviewed during a future inspection. (50-416/82-03-13)
,
.
.
4.2.1.2 Area and Process Radiation Monitors The area and process radiat*on monitors (ARMS) were to be reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(9); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.E; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.H.
The auditor toured all ARMS locations and found that the ARMS had not been fully installed, nor have any acceptance tests been conducted on the system.
Based on the above finding, the adequacy of this area of the applicant's program could not be determined and this area will be reviewed during a future inspec-tion. (50-416/82-03-14)
4.2.1.3 Non-Radiation Process Monitors The non-radiation process monitors include such items as toxic gas (i.e.,
chlorine) monitors, seismic monitors, containment pressure and temperature and flow rates.
This area was to be reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(8); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.B; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.H.
The auditor determined that the instruments / detectors were not all in place, calibrated and tested.
Based on the above findings, the adequacy of this area of the applicant's pro-gram could not be determined and this area will be reviewed during a future inspection. (50-416/82-03-15)
4.2.1.4 Meteorological Instrumentation The meteorological instrumentation was reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(9); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.B and E and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.H and Appendix 2, NUREG-0696, NUREG-0737, and Regu-latory Guides 1.23 and 1.97.
The applicant outlined the characteristics of the meteorological measurements system in the Emergency Plan, Rev. 4, dated 10/81. The integration of meteoro-logical data into the licensee's dose projection scheme is summarized in Volume 10, Section 01 of the Plant Operations Manual and is implemented using EPP 10-S-01-12.
The auditor also reviewed the applicant's meteorological instrumentation and its associated preventive maintenance program with the applicant.
e The current meteorological instrumentation provides the basic parameters (i.e.,
wind direction and speed and an estimator of atmospheric stability) necessary to perform the dose assessment function. Data from the meteorological measurements system were available, upon request, in the control room on a computer display screen.
The primary meteorological system is redundant, with all parameters being duplicated.
In addition, a backup system on a separate tower is available.
Data from the backup system is also available in the control room.
Only one of the redundant primary systems is available in the control room at a time.
-_
_
.-
_.
-, _ -.
.
.
.
The applicant has maintained a program for inspection and preventive main-tenance. The instrumentation in the meteorological shed is checked three times each day.
Calibrations are done semi-annually.
However, only one of the redundant primary systems is calibrated each time, with the calibrations offset by three months. Data from the system most recently calibrated is sent to the control room. The siting and exposure of the meteorological instrumentation on the towers at the time of the appraisal was acceptable.
The auditors concluded that the applicant had the capability to appropriately integrate meteorological data into the radiological assessment / dose projection procedures with the exception of stability from the backup tower. Stability is determined from the backup system by the standard deviation of wind direction fluctuations (sigma theta). EPP 10-S-01-12 failed to contain information on how to convert sigma theta values to a stability class. The shift operations person-nel will obtain acceptable National Weather Service information on severe weather warnings and watches in the site vicinity from the MP&L load dispatcher.
Based on the above findings, this portion of the applicant's program appears to be adequate.
However, the following item should be addressed for program improvement:
EPP 10-S-01-12 should be revised to contain the stability classifica-tion based on the standard deviation of wind direction flucuations ( sigma theta). (50-416/82-16)
4.2.2 Protective-Equipment 4.2.2.1 Respiratory Protection Respiratory protection was to be reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(11): 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV. E; and criteria given in NUREG-0654, Sectirn II.H, ANSI Z88.1969, and Regulatory Guide 8.15.
The number and distribution of respiratory devices appears to be adequate. However, the respiratory program is not functional because training, procedures, and testing facilities have not been completed.
Based on the above findings, the adequacy of this area of the applicant's program could not be determined and this area will be reviewed during a future inspection. (50-416/82-03-17)
4.2.2.2 Protective Clothing The area of protective clothing was to be reviewed with respect to the require-ments 10 CFR 50.47(b)(8); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.E; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.H.
The auditor determined that this area was incomplete and no evaluation was performed at this time by request of the applicant. This area will be reviewed during a future inspection. (50-416/82-03-18)
4.2.3 Emergency Communications The area of emergency communication equipment was to be reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(6); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.E; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.F.
The auditor determined that this area was incomplete anJ no evaluation was performed at this time by request of the applicant.
This area will be reviewed during a future inspection.
(50-416/
82-03-19)
.-
.
.
4.2.4-4.2.5 Corrective Action and Reserve Emergency Equipment Corrective action and reserve emergency equipment were to be reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(8); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.E; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.H.
The auditor deter-mined that this area was incomplete and no evaluation was performed at this time by request of the applicant.
This area will be reviewed during a future inspection. (50-416/82-03-20)
4.2.6 Emergency Transportation Emergency Transportation was to be reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(8); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.E; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.H.
The auditor determined that this area was incomplete and no evaluation was performed at this time by request of the applicant. This area will be reviewed during a future inspection. (50-416/82-03-21)
5.0 PROCEDURES
,
5.1 General Content and Format The applicant has developed Emergency Plan Procedures (EPPs) to implement the Plan.
The EPPs reviewed had adequate content and format.
However, all EPPs have not yet been approved.
It was determined that this area was incomplete and no evaluation was performed at this time by request of the applicant. This area will be reviewed during a future inspection. (50-416/82-03-22)
5.2 Emergency, Alarm and Abnormal Occurrence Procedures The emergency, alarm and abnormal occurence procedures were to be reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(9); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.B; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.D, H and I.
The applicant's alarm procedures are currently under development.
The abnormal operating procedures were reveiwed.
These procedures referenced, where appropriate, the EPPs in a general way (i.e., no specific procedure number).
Except for complete loss of DC power, the abnormal operating procedures were found to adequately relate to emergency action levels as specified in the Plan and EPPs.
However, although approved, the abnormal operating procedures have not yet been formally issued for use.
It was determined that this area was
'
incomplete and no further evaluation was performed at this time. This area will be reviewed during a future inspection. (50-416/82-03-23)
5.3 Implementing Instructions The area of implementing instructions was to be reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(9); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.B; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.C, D, H and I.
The EPPs are, for the most part, developed fer each class of emergency specified in the Plan.
EALs are defined and based u; s observable information available for required actions. However, not all EPPs are issued, and full evaluation of the EALs was not undertaken.
It was determined that this area was incomplete and no evaluation was performed at this time.
This area will be reviewed during a future inspection. (50-416/82-03-24)
,
y
- - - -
-
-
-, --
_ -
_ -
_.
_. _.
.
..
_ _ - _
__
_
_
.
.
5.4 Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures 5.4.1 flotification Procedures The area of notification procedures was to be reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(5) and (6); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.D; and criteria in flVREG-0654,Section II.E. F. H and J.
The auditor determined that this area was incomplete and no evaluation was performed at this time by request of the applicant. This area will be revie9d during a future inspection.
(50-416/82-0^-25)
5.4.2 Assessment Actions Assessment actions involve procedures required for offsite radiological surveys (5.4.2.1), onsite (out-of-plant) radiological surveys (5.4.2.2), in-plant
radiological surveys (5.4.2.3), primary coolant sampling (5.4.2.4), primary
-
coolant sample analysis (5.4.2.5), containment air sampling (5.4.2.6), con-tainment air sample analysis (5.4.2.7), stack effluent sampling (5.4.2.8), stack effluent sample analysis (5.4.2.9), liquid effluent sampling (5.4.2.10),
liquid effluent sample analysis (5.4.2.11) and the radiological environmental monitoring program (5.4.2.12). The applicant's procedures for assessing the radiological consequences of an accident were to be reviewed with respect to the I
requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(9); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.B.; and specific criteria in flVREG-0654,Section II.I.
Based on the absence of critical assessment procedures the adequacy of this portion of the applicant's program could not be determined. This area will be reviewed during a future inspection.
(50-416/82-03-26)
5.4.3 Protective Actions Protective actions involve procedures required for radiation protection during emergencies (5.4.3.1), evacuation of owner controlled areas (5.4.3.2), personnel accountability (5.4.3.3), personnel monitoring and decontamination (5.4.3.4),
and onsite first/ rescue (5.4.3.5).
The applicant's procedures for protective actions during emergencies were to be reviewed with respect to the requirements
,
'
of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(10) and (11); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.B; and the criteria in fluREG-0654,Section II.J, K and L.
The auditor determined that this area was incomplete and no evaluation was performed at this time by request of the applicant. This area will be reviewed during a future inspection.
(50-416/82-03-27)
j 5.4.4 Security During Emergencies The procedures involving security during emergencies were to be reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(10); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Para-
graph IV.B; and criteria in flUREG-0654,Section II.K.
The auditor determined that this area was incomplete and no evaluation was performed at this time by request of the applicant. This area will be reviewed during a future inspec-l tion.
(50-416/82-03-28)
I t
l
.--
.
__
__-
--
.
. -
- -
- -
- -
-
..
.
-
-
.
d
.
,
5.4.5 Repair / Corrective Actions The procedures involving repair / corrective actions were to be reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(13); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E.
Paragraph IV.H; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.K.
The auditor deter-mined that this area was incomplete and no evaluation was performed at this time by request of the applicant.
This area will be reviewed during a future inspection. (50-416/82-03-29)
5.4.6 Recovery The procedures involving recovery actions were to be reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(13): 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.H;
,
j and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.M.
The auditor determined that this area was incomplete and no evaluation was performed at this time by request of the applicant.
This area will be reviewed during a future inspection.
(50-416/
82-03-30)
5.4.7 Public Information The procedures involving the public information program were to be reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(7); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Para-graph IV.D; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.G.
The auditor determined that this area was incomplete and no evaluation was performed at this time by request of the applicant.
This area will be reviewed during a future inspec-tion. (50-416/82-03-31)
5.5 Supplementary Procedures Supplementary procedures involve inventory of emergency equipment and supplies (5.5.1), drills and exercises (5.5.2), review, revision and distribution of plans and procedures (5.5.3), and audits of the emergency preparedness program (5.5.4). This araa was to be reviewed with respect to che requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(8), (14), and (16); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.E, F and G; and the criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.H, N and P.
The auditor determined that this area was incomplete and no evaluation was per-formed at this time by request of the applicant.
This area will be reviewed during a future inspection. (50-416/82-03-32)
.
6.0 COORDINATION WITH OFFSITE GROUPS 6.1 Offsite Agencies The area of coordination with offsite agencies was reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(3) and (12); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV. A; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II. A, B, E and L.
The auditor discussed offsite agencies which support a station emergency with the Emergency Planning Coordinator and reviewed letters of agreement contained in Appendix 0 of the Plan.
Current written agreements have been established with offsite agencies and organizations to provide for medical assistance, medical transportation, fire protection and law enforcement support in the
.
.
.
event of an emergency. MP&L is in the process of finalizing arrangements with the U.S. Coast Guard, a Mutual Assistance Plan with Arkansas Power & Light and Louisiana Power & Light, and General Electric for support during emergencies.
This matter is addressed in the GGNS Safety Evaluation Report (NUREG-0831, October 1981).
Training has been provided for members of offsite support groups, which includes site orientation and familiarization training for those individuals who may need to respond to the site.
A formal training and retraining program has not been established for offsite support groups (See Section 3.0).
On January 7,1982, the auditor and the Emergency Planning Coordinator met with representatives from the Claiborne County Fire Department, Port Gibson Police Department, Claiborne County Hospital and Claiborne County Sheriff's Department to discuss emergency response at the GGNS. The individuals contacted at each of these organizations were cognizant of their role in the event of an emergency at GGNS, had been provided training in their respective roles in emergency response and were satisfied that adequate communications and interface had been provided between their respective organizations and MP&L. The auditor noted that adequate overall interaction and coordination between offsite groups and the applicant were evident in the recent full-scale exercise (See IE Report No. 50-416/81-44 50-417/81-19). The Chief of the Port Gibson Police Department expressed concern over the absence of full coordination and interface between the city and county with regard to evacuation plans.
Subsequent to the appraisal, on January 15, 1982, the auditor contacted the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Region IV Regional Assistance Committee (FEMA RAC IV) to discuss the matter of the coordination of evacuation plans for the city and county.
The auditor was informed that the city had been included in the county plan and that the matter would be addressed in the evaluation of the offsite (State and local) plans by FEMA RAC IV.
This matter will remain open pending the final report by FEMA on the adequacy of offsite plans.
(50-416/82-03-33)
6.2 General Pubitc The area of coordination with the general public was to be reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(6) and (7); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Para-graph IV.D; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.G.
The auditor determined that this area was incomplete and no evaluation was performed at this time by naquest of the applicant.
This area will be reviewed during a future inspection. (50-416/82-03-34)
6.3 News Media The area of coordination with news media was to be reviewed with respect to the i
requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(7); 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.D; and criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.G.
The auditor determined that this area was incomplete and no evaluation was performed at this time by request of the
,
applicant.
This area will be reviewed during a future inspection.
(50-416/
82-03-35)
I
-. -
,-
,, -. _ -.__.---._ _ --
-
.
7.0 DRILLS, EXERCISES AND WALKTHROUGHS 7.1 Drills and Exercises The area of drills and exercises was reviewed with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14): 10 CFR 50, Appendix E. Paragraph IV,F; and the criteria in NUREG-0654,Section II.N.
A full-scale emergency planning exercise was conducted at the GGNS during the period November 3-6, 1981. See OIE Report No.
50-416/81-44 and 50-417/81-19 for details of this exercise.
Based on the above findings, this portion of the applicant's program appears to be adequate.
7.2 Walk-Through Observations Due to the absence of installed and operable equipment, procedures and training on the procedures and equipment, the following walk-throughs were not made:
Dose Calculations Post Accident Coolant Sampling and Analysis Containment Air Sampling and Analysis Stack Ef fluent Sampling and Analysis Liquid Ef fluent Sampling and Analysis Inplant Radiological Surveys Offsite Environmental Sampling and Analysis Onsite (Out-of-Plant) Radiological Surveys Notifications Accident Assessment and Use of EALs Decontamination and First Aid / Rescue Security The walk-through observations will be conducted during a future inspection.
(50-416/82-03-36)
8.0 Exit Interview A meeting with MP&L corporate and site management personnel was requested by the appraisal team leader to discuss the current status of the site emergency preparedness program. On January 8,1982, a meeting was held at the site with tehose persons indicated in Section 9 of this report. The appraisal team leader presented the findings of the first three days of the appraisal.
At the recommendation of the appraisal team leader and with the concurrence of those persons in attendance, it was decided that the appraisal should be terminated and that the meeting should be considered as the exit interview. This decision was based on the fact that: 1) for those areas of the emergency preparedness program that had been reviewed no evaluation could be made, for the most part, because of the incomplete state of preparedness (two exceptions were meteorological instrumentation and coordination with offsite support groups),
and 2) for those areas that had not yet been reviewed the applicant requested that no review and evaluation be conducted because they were not complete at the present time. The appraisal team leader informed the applicant that the emergency preparedness deficiency (Table B-1 augmentation times, Section 2.2)
and the incomplete areas identified during the appraisal would be specified in
-
.
the appraisal report and would have to be resolved prior to issuance of a license. The appraisal team leader requested that the applicant furnish the NRC a schedule for completion of the various areas of their emergency preparedness program.
Subsequent to the appraisal, on January 25, 1982, MP&L sumbitted a schedule for completion of various areas of the GGNS Emergency Preparedness Program.
!
_ _
-
-
.
9.0 PERSONS CONTACTED 9.1 MP&L Personnel
- N.
L. Stampley, Sr. Vice President-Nuclear Production
- J. P. McGaughy, Assistant Vice President-Nuclear Production
- L. F. Dale, Manager, Nuclear Services J. D. Richardson, Manager, Nuclear Safety and Licensing C. K. McCoy, Plant Manager
- R. A. Ambrosino, Nuclear Support Manager ( Acting Plant Manager)
- P. B. Benedict, Emergency Planning Coordinator
- R. R. Weedon, Chem and Rad Control Superintendent
- D. L. Hunt. Plant Quality Superintendent
- J.
Vincelli, Health Physicist G.H. Lee, Training Supervisor P. Sudnok, Training Coordinator C. L. Stuart, Assistant Plant Manager J. R. Elms, Maintenance Superintendent A. McKeigney, Vice President, Information Services J. F. Pinto, Manager, Nuclear Plant Engineering A. J. Malone, Technical Engineer T. Rivers, Public Relations Assistant D. Williams, Rad Control Supervisor G. Becker, Fire, Safety, Medical Technician D. Smith, Startup Engineer J. Keggris, Acting Operations Supervisor L. Robertson, Operations Assistant V. Holmberry, Fire Protection and Safety Coordinator H. D. Castles, Risk Control Specialist G. Smith, Offsite Emergency Communicator W. M. Shelly, Operations Instructor 9.2 Other Organizations S. L. Jennings, Ci.ief, Claiborne County Fire Department H. Jones, Chief, Port Gibson Police Department
!
F. Davis, Sheriff, Claiborne County C. Trevillion, Claiborne County Hospital H. Beavers, Claiborna County Hospital E. Grisham, Claiborne County Hospital e
J. Lowe, Claiborne County Hospital J. Richardson, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region IV 9.3 NRC A.G. Wagner, Sr. Resident Inspector
- Attended the exit meeting on January 8,1982