ML17194A337

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:57, 7 July 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
E-Mail from Jerry Houff, Zion Solutions to John Hickman, NRC, Dated March 22, 2017, Forwarding TSD-17-003, Rev 0 - Evaluation of Efficiency Calibration Geometries for In-Situ Gamma Spectrometry During FSS
ML17194A337
Person / Time
Site: Zion  File:ZionSolutions icon.png
Issue date: 03/22/2017
From: Houff J
ZionSolutions
To: John Hickman, Vaaler M
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
References
TSD-17-003, Rev 0
Download: ML17194A337 (49)
v • d • e


Text

Hickman, John From: Sent: To: Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

Jerry X. Houff <jx houff@energysolutions

.com > Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10: 26 AM Hickman, John; Vaaler, Marlayna Nick Williams [External_Sender]

NRC Submittal Documents TSD-17-003 Rev 0 -Evaluation of Efficiency Calibration Geometries for In-Situ Gamma Spectrometry Dur in g FSS.pdf John, Second Document for 1300 meeting. Jerry Houff ZionSolutions Licensing Manager jxhouff@enrgyso lutions.com Work Phone (224)789-4090 Cell Phone (860)608-6408 1

ZionSolutions, Inc. Technical Support Document TSD 17-003 Evaluation of Efficiency Calibration Geometries for In-Situ Gamma Spectrometry During Final Status Surveys Revision 0 f4L 1 fL,Juk_ Originator:

__ (_ kff_!!i __ j ________ Date: 21-Mar-17 Pete Hollenbeck Reviewer:

__ -___ Date: 21-Mar-1 7 Eric Darois Approval:

______________

Date: ______ _ Robert Yetter Summary of Changes in this Revision:

  • Rev. 0 -Initial issuance. DO D ITIIlIJ R OD [ DODD ODDO[

Table of Contents OD D CIIJDOO R DD [ 00000000[

I. PURPO SE .........................

......................................................

..........................................

........ 4 2. DIS C US S ION ...............................................................

.................................

........................... 4 3. E FFI C I ENC Y E V ALU ATIONS .....................................................................

..................

....... 6 3.1. Ex p o n e nti a l Ci r c ul a r Plan e M o d e l ............................

.................................................... 6 3.2. No n-uniform S ur fa c es ........................................................................

.........................

10 4. C ON CLUS ION S .......................................................

..................

...................

........................

1 2 5. R E F E R E N CE S ..................

.................................................................................................

.... 1 2 6. ATTA C HM E NT S ............

..................................................................

..................................... 12 List of Tables Ta bl e I -S ur vey A r e a s wi th Pre-e s t a bli s h e d !S O CS Ge ometr y M o d e l s .......................................

4 Ta ble 2 -EC P Mod e l Co mp a ri s ons .................................

.............................

...........................

..... I 0 Ta ble 3 -2.5 4 c m C P M o d e l E fficien cy Co mpari so n ......................

............................................. 11 Ta ble 4 -I .2 7 c m C P Mod e l Ef ficienc y Co mpari s on ................................

.................................... 11 Ta ble 5 -3 M e t e r EC P M o d e l E ffici e ncy C omp a ri so n ..................................

..................

............ 11 Ta bl e 6 -3 M ete r Minu s I Fo ot E CP M o d e l E ffi c i e n cy C ompar iso n .................................

........ 11 Ta bl e 7 -Two Di s tan ces EC P Mod e l Ef fi c i e n cy Co mp a ri s on .....................................

................ 1 2 List of Figures Fig ur e I -A ll Sa mpl e D a ta ...............................................................

............................

.................

7 F i g ure 2 -A ll Sa mpl e D a t a Without To p Inch .................................

...............................

...............

8 F i g ure 3 -All Sa mpl e D a t a Without To p T w o In c h es .................................

..................................

9

1. PURPOSE DO D[[]]]]]] R rn [ ornoornoc The purpose of this Technical Support Document (TSO) is s ummarize the evaluations performed to address the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) Request for Additional Information (RAI) on how a surveyor will determine ifthe geometry of remaining residual radioactivity is s ignificantl y different from that which was assumed in TSO 14-022. A review of the recommendation s in TS D 14-022 shows that only four areas have the geometry template for final surveys established.

The geometry definitions , as provided in Table I, use variables contained in the ISOCS Geometry Composer defined as: ECP Model: Ex ponential Circular Plane geometry, where DRL is the relaxation length for the exponential distribution

the depth at which the activity concentration falls by a factor of 1 /e from DMAX , and DMAX is the depth at which the maximum activity concentration occurs. C P Model
C ircular Plane Model where the depth profile can be set for various distributions (including linear) and a discrete depth. Table 1 -Survey Areas with Pre-established ISOCS Geometry Models Location Status Auxiliary Basement ECP model with DRL = 2.75cm, DMAX = Ocm and source depth of Floor 5.8cm Containment Ba se ment CP model set for liner wit h a so urce thickness of O. I 53cm. Turbine Building and model set -CP with 2.54cm total main steam tunnels depth Cr ib House , Forebay , model set -CP with I .27c m total and Circulating Water depth Intake Pipes The remaining areas have recommendation s to characterize when they become accessible and available.

Evaluations of the effec ts of remediation to the Auxiliary Building basement concrete depth profile in the Expo nential Circular Plan e (ECP) model and the of non-uniform surfaces are presented below. 2. DISCUSSION The NRC provided the following RAI to Zion: The previous HP RAJ 6 comments (as provided to the licensee in May 2016) note that there is an apparent discrepancy between recommendations from the licensee's TSD-14-022 (Revision

0) document and the LTP with regard to additional core sampling to validate the limited core data currently available or to provide new data in areas that are OD D ITIIIIIJ R ITJ [ DITJD D ITJD[ considered to have a unique operational history or contamination profile. The licensee's response, as provided in July 2016, indicates that such core samples may not be taken and that the necessity to validate the geometry for ISOCs efficiency calibration is addressed as Step 4.2.7 of ZS-LT-300-001-001 (Revision 2), "FRS Package Development." This procedure simply directs the surveyor to "review post remediation conditions and surveys to determine if the geometry ofremaining residual radioactivity has significantly changed from that assumed in TSD 14-022," and that "if the geometry appears to be significantly different from that which was assumed in TSD 14-022, then inform the C/LT Manager." There appears to be no definition or procedure to direct the surveyor in making this assessment or a description of what constitutes a significant change from assumptions.

As such, the proposed approach does not provide an adequate justification as to why the core samples recommended by TSD 14-022 may not be necessary.

Details on the methods and procedures the STS surveyor will follow to assess differences in geometry should be provided.

It is additionally important that the NRC understand the usage of core samples on a per survey unit basis , and details on the !SOCS geometry utilized within a survey unit should be presented in any Final Status Survey Report (FSSR) provided to the NRC. Zion provided the following response:

There are two aspects of the concrete geometry that will be reviewed during FSS design to determine if there are significant differences from the Exponential Circular Plane (ECP) geometry selected in TSO 14-022 to perform the efficiency calibration for general areas. As listed in TSO 14-014 , section 7 , there are four areas that required further characterization to confirm that the ECP applies or, if a different geometry should be used for the efficiency calibration.

There are two geometry considerations; I) the uniformity, or smoothness of the surface, and 2) the distribution of contamination with depth. The ECP efficiency calibration assumes a smooth surface. This assumption will be used if remediation does not result causing significant non-uniformities in the concrete surface, such as trenches, deep gouges, etc. that would produce a " wall edge", which causes significant photon shielding between the source at the bottom of the trench or gouge and the ISOCS detector.

An assessment will be performed using the !SOCS geometr y composer to determine a set of measurable parameters for the engineer to apply in the field to asse s s ifthe surface geometry i s significantly different from the ECP assumption of smooth surface. The parameters will be added to the Procedure ZS-LT-300-001-00 I (Revision 2), "FRS Package Development".

A standard acceptance criteria for instrument variability applied to source checks is+/-20%. A lower value of I 0% will be applied in setting the parameters for designating a remediated area as non-uniform.

The I 0% criterion will apply to the difference between the efficiency values for the uniform geometry and the efficiency values for the ECP geometry.

If the efficiency value for the non-uniform geometry is more than I 0% lower than the ECP geometry, then an area-specific efficiency calibration geometry will be applied to the affected area. A description of the condition of the surfaces measured by !SOCS during FSS, and the geometry applied for the efficiency calibration in the affected area will be described in DO D ITilIJOO R OD [ 00000000[

the FSS Final Report. The second geometry consideration is the distribution of contamination with depth. During survey qesign , the cores collected from the areas recommended in TSO 14-022 will be reviewed. The actual mea s ured values in the new cores, the 0.5 inch core s lices , will be used in the ISOCS geometry composer directl y to determine the actual efficiency based on the core data. The difference s between actual efficiency and the ECP efficiency will be evaluated.

As for the assessment of surface uniformity, if the efficiency based on core data is more than I 0% lower than the ECP efficiency, the core data will be used as the basis for the efficiency calibration in the affected area. A de sc ription of the core assessment and the geometry applied for the efficiency calibration in the affected area will be de sc ribed in the FSS Final Report. Procedure ZS-L T-300-001-00 I will be updated to include the parameters for evaluating uniformit y and the contamination depth profile after the parameters for determining when a surface is " non-uniform" have been selected. The assessment performed to select the parameters will be documented in a TSO along with the process for evaluating the depth profil e efficiency u sing new cores. The TSO and revised procedure will be provided to NRC when completed.

3. EFFICIENCY EVALUATIONS 3.1. Exponential Circular Plane Model The first ste p in the eva luation was to use the depth and activity data from Table 2 in TSO 14-022 and re-produce the analysis.

Figure I presents the graphical analysis of the* Table 2 data. The red curve is a plot of the All Core Sample Average Source Term data in (Ci) vs sa mple depth. Eac h core was sliced into 0.5 inch thick puck s. The average source term value was assigned to the depth of half the puck thickness.

The 2. 75cm DRL curve was calculated by the following equation: -x; A= A 0 e L Where A = activity at depth x Ao= Cm ax = 0.247 Ci from Table 2 in TSO 14-022 L = DRL = 2.75cm X =depth in cm DO D ITilIIlJ R DD [ DODD ODDO[ 3.00E-01 2.SOE-01 -2.00E-01 Q E ... Q) l.SOE-01 I-Q) u ... :::s 0 l.OOE-01 Vl 5.00E-02 O.OOE+OO 0 0 ..... Figure 1 -All Sample Data All Samples Average Source Term (Ci) 0 0 0 0 N rn All data exp fit equation:

y = 0.247e o.304x R 2 = 0.9188 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -<i U") <.D ,.... 00 CJ'\ ci ..... N rn -<i ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 0 0 Cl 0 U") <.D ..... ..... Depth (cm) -Ser1es.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl Cl 0 ,.... 00 CJ'\ ci ..... N rn ..... ..... ..... N N N N * * * * * * * *

  • f)(pon. {Seriesl) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl "'" U") ID ,.... N N N N This graph is in agreement with the graph presented in TSO 14-022 and shows that the 2.75cm Depth of the Relaxation Length (DRL) curve is a much better fit to the data than the exponential curve calculated by Excel. The next steps were to remove the data from the top two layers (I inch) and the top 4 layers (2 inches) to represent the results from remediation.

These evaluations were performed to determine if any limited remediation would change the geometry and efficiencies of the ECP model. After removing the activity data , the depths were re-set represent the top layers. Figures 2 and 3 present the graphical analysis of the effects of removal of the top inch and top 2 inches, respectively.

0 0 oci N 6.00E-02 5.00E-02 -4.00E-02 Q E ... Qj 3.00E-02 I-Qj u ... :I 0 VI 2.00E-02 l.OOE-02 0.00 E+OO Figure 2 -All Sample Data Without Top Inch Samples w/o Top 1" Average Source Term (Ci) Sa m ple data ex p o n e n tial fit: y = 0.0505e--0 1 44* R 2 = 0.9864 .... DO D ITIIIIIJ R DD [ 00000 000[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Depth (cm) __._ Se r iesl --e-5eries2 *********

Expon. (Seriesl)

DO D ITililJ R OD [ DODOO ODD[ 2.50E-02 2.00E-02 -Q E l.50E-02 ... <11 1-(11 v ... ::J 0 VI l.OOE-02 5.00E-03 O.OOE+OO 0 Figure 3 -All Sample Data Without Top Two Inches Samples w/o Top 2" Aver a ge Sou r ce Term (Ci) Sample data exponential fit: y = 0.023e o. is<x R 2 = 0.9896 5 10 15 20 Depth (cm) w/o top 2" Average Source Term (Ci) 2.75cm DRL data 25 *********

Expon. (Samples w/o top 2" Average Source Term (Ci)) 30 Both Figures 2 and 3 have the same 2.75cm DRL curve as s hown on Figure 1 and the Excel exponential fitted curve of the data. Review of Figures 2 and 3 s hows that the 2.75cm DRL curve is not the best fit of the data. The Excel exponential curve is the better fit of the data. The original analysis of a ll the data chose the source depth to be equal to approximately 90% of the cumulative ac tivity. This depth is 5.8cm and based upon the 2.75cm DRL curve. Usi n g the same criteria on the exponential curves in Figures 2 and 3 result s in a source depth of 9.5cm with the top 1 inch removed and 12.1 cm with the top 2 inches removed. The DRL depth is equal to the depth when the maximum activity has been reduced by a factor of 1 /e, equal to 0.368. The DRL va lu e for a ll the data is 2. 75cm. The calculated DRL value, based upon the exponent i a l curves, is 4.1 Ocm for data with the top inch removed and 5.43cm for the data with the top 2 inches removed. 35 Table 2 presents a summary of the ECP model evaluations.

Table 2 -ECP Model Comparisons Source Dmax Core Data thickness (cm) (cm) all (from TSD 14-022) 5.8 0 minus top 1" 9.5 0 minus top 2" 12.1 0 DRL (cm) 2.75 4.10 5.43 DO D DJilIJ R rn C D DITJ DD ITJDC Review of the Table 2 data shows that removal of the top inch of concrete increases the source thickness from 5.8cm to 9.5cm. This increase is a factor of 1.6 from the remediated thickness.

Removal of the top inch of concrete increases the DRL from 2.75cm to 4.1 Ocm. This increase is a factor of 1.5 from the un-remediated length. These evaluations show that any remediation of the Aux Bldg basement floor will result in a change to the ECP model presented in TSD 14-022. The post-remediation conditions need to be evaluated and a revised ECP model created. There is sufficient characterization data, so additional cores are not needed. All data used in these evaluations is presented in Attachment I. 3.2. Non-uniform Surfaces Prior to performing the Final Status Survey of a concrete basement floor, remediation may need to be performed.

This remediation could include hot spot removal or reduction, removal of a drain line or removal of a surface layer. These remediations may create a non-uniform surface. This evaluation assumes that hot spot remediation and drain pipe removal will result in a gouge or hole or trench of up to I foot in depth. The area of these remediations will also be assumed to be small when compared to the 28.3 m 2 Field of View (FOY) for each measurement; however, that is not a condition for the evaluations.

The purpose of these evaluations is to examine the effect of placing the detector at a distance of 3 meters minus I foot (2.6952 meters) from the average level of the surface to compensate for the non-uniformity , hole or trench but using the 3-meter distance efficiencies to analyze the spectrums.

In this geometry, most of the surface being measured will be closer to the detector than the hole or trench. The parameters from Zion !SOCS detector SIN 5456 was used to perform the evaluations.

Two geometries were created for each evaluation; a detector to surface distance of3 meters and a distance of 3 meters minus I foot. These geometries were created for a 2.54cm contamination layer and I .27cm contamination layer with a CP geometry and for the three ECP geometries described in Section 3.1. The efficiencies for the Cs-137 and Co-60 gamma energies were recorded for both distances in each geometry and compared.

The Geometry Composer reports for the CP geometries and gamma efficiencies are presented in Attachment

2. The Geometry DO D CTIJIIlJ R OJ [ DOJDOJOJD[

Co m po s er r e p o rt s for t h e EC P geo m e tri e s a n d g a mm a effic i e n c i e s a r e prese nt e d in Attachme nt 3. Tab le 3 p r ese n t s a co mp a ri so n of t h e 2.54cm C P geo m etr y effic i e n c i e s. Table 3 -2.54cm CP Model Efficiency Compari s on E n e r gy 3m 3 m-lft Ratio res ult s r es ults 3 m-lf t/ (KeV) (c/y) (c/y) 3 m 66 1.65 2.85 E-06 3. lO E-06 1.09 1 1 73.22 2.24E-06 2.43 E-06 1.08 1 3 32.49 2.12 E-06 2.3 0 E-06 1.0 8 Table 4 pre s e n ts a compar i so n of t h e I .27cm CP geo m etr y efficiencie

s. Tabl e 4 -1.27cm C P Model E fficienc y Compari s on E n e r gy 3 m 3 m-lft R a tio r es ult s r es ults 3 m-lft/ (KeV) (c/y) (c/y) 3 m 661.65 3.25 E-06 3.53E-06 1.09 11 7 3.22 2.47 E-06 2.68 E-06 1.09 1 332.49 2.32E-06 2.5 3E-06 1.09 Table 5 p r ese n ts a compa ri so n o f t he 3 m eter E C P geo m etr y effic i e n cie s. Tabl e 5 -3 Meter E CP Mod e l E fficiency C ompari s on E n e r gy A ll Data w/o top 1" w/o top Ratio Ratio all/minus a ll/minu s (K eV) (c/y) (c/y) 2" (c/y) top 1" top 2" 66 1.65 2.50E-0 6 2.09 E-06 1.84E-0 6 1.20 1.36 11 73.22 2.02 E-06 1.74 E-06 1.57 E-06 1.1 6 1.2 9 1 33 2.49 l.92E-06 1.6 7E-06 1.5 1 E-06 1.1 5 1.28 Tab le 6 p r e s e n ts a com p a r iso n of t he 3 m eter mi nu s I foot E CP geometr y effic i e n cies. T abl e 6 -3 Me t e r Minus 1 F oot E CP Model Efficienc y Compari s on E n e r gy A ll Data w/o top 1" w/o top Ratio Ratio all/minu s all/minu s (KeV) (c/y) (c/y) 2" (c/y) top 1" top 2" 66 1.65 2.70E-06 2.27 E-06 2.0 1 E-06 1.1 9 1.34 117 3.22 2.1 7E-06 l .8 8 E-06 1.70 E-06 1.15 1.28 1 332.49 2.07 E-06 1.8 1 E-06 1.6 3E-06 1.14 1.2 6 DO D IIIIIIIJ R DD [ DODD DD ODD[ Table 7 presents a co mpari so n of the 3 m e t er a nd 3 met e r minus I foot distance EC P geometry effic i e n cies. Table 7 -Two Distances ECP Model Efficiency Comparison Energy All Data W/OTop W/O Top Ratio 1" Ratio 2" Ratio (KeV) 3m-1I3m 3m-1 I 3m 3m-1I3m 661.65 1.08 1.09 1.09 1173.22 1.07 1.08 1.08 1332.49 1.07 1.08 1.08 R eview of the dat a in Tables 3 , 4 a nd 7 s h ow t h at u s in g the 3 m ete r effic i e ncie s with the d etector at 3 met e r s minu s I foot distance, wi ll produce an approximately 7% to 9% conservative values for Cs-1 37 and Co-60. R eview of the data in Table 5 s h ow that the Cs-1 3 7 and Co-60 ga mm a effic i e ncie s ra n ge from 15% to 20% higher for the EC P model w ith all the data than th e co rre s pondin g val u es fo r the top I inc h removed. This is a sig nific a nt change in th e effic i e nc y. R eview of th e d ata in Table 6 s h ow that the Cs-137 a nd Co-60 ga mm a effic i e ncie s range from 14% to 19% higher for the EC P mod e l w ith all th e data than the cor re s pondin g values for the top I inch r e mov ed. 4. CONCLUSIONS I. Any remediation of a concrete s ur face after ana l ys i s of the co ncr ete core dat a h as b een completed wi ll require re-evaluation of the I SOCS geometry model and data a nd/or collection of a dditi ona l core d ata. 2. For non-uniform surfaces with gouges, pits or trenches up to I foot in depth can b e conservatively evaluated b y pl aci n g th e d etecto r a t a di sta n ce of 3 m eters minu s I foot (2.7 meters) and u sing th e 3 met er e ffici e n cies. Di s tanc es deeper th an I foot s hould be eva lu ated o n a case-by-ca se ba sis. 5. REFERENCES I. Zio n R eacto r License Ter mination Pl a n R ev i sio n I. 2. Z ion TSO 14-022, "Use of In-Situ Gam ma S p ectrosco p y fo r So ur ce Term S ur vey of End State Structures", R evision 0. 6. ATTACHMENTS Attac hment I --'-Ex ponenti al C ircular Plan e Dat a Attac hm e nt 2 -No n-uni form Surface Effic i e nci es with C P Mod e l Attac hm e nt 3 -Non-uniform S urfac e Effic i e nci es with the ECP Model Attachment 1 Exponential Circular Plane Data OD D ITilIIlJ R OD [ 000000000[

All Samples Depth cm Average % of total cumulative Exp fit Source Term % data (Ci) 0.63 5 2.47E-01 45.96% 4 5.96% 2.04E-01 1.905 l.14E-01 21.21% 67.17% 1.38E-01 3.1 75 5.05E-0 2 9.40% 76.56% 9.41E-02 4.445 2.85E-0 2 5.30% 81.86% 6.40E-02 5.715 2.3 0E-0 2 4.28% 86.14% 4.35E-02 6.9 85 l.65E-0 2 3.07% 89.21% 2.95E-02 8.2 55 l.14E-0 2 2.12% 91.33% 2.0lE-02 9.52 5 l.25E-0 2 2.33% 93.66% l.37E-02 10.795 4.86E-0 3 0.90% 94.56% 9.28E-03 1 2.065 8.85E-03 1.65% 96.21% 6.31E-03 13.3 35 4.llE-03 0.76% 96.98% 4.2 9E-03 14.605 3.26E-03 0.61% 97.58% 2.91E-03 1 5.875 2.60E-0 3 0.48% 98.07% l.98E-03 17.1 45 2.09E-03 0.39% 98.45% l.35E-03 18.415 l.68E-03 0.31% 9.15E-04 19.685 l.35E-03 0.25% 6.22E-04 2 0.9 55 l.09E-0 3 0.20% 4.23E-04 22.225 8.82E-04 0.16% 2.8 7E-04 2 3.4 9 5 7.15E-04 0.13% l.95E-04 2 4.765 5.74E-0 4 0.11% 1.33E-04 2 6.035 4.65E-04 0.09% 9.02E-05 27.305 . 3.77E-04 0.07% 6.13E-05 2 8.5 75 3.06E-04 0.06% 4.1 7E-05 2 9.845 2.50E-04 0.05% 2.83E-05 31.115 2.03E-04 0.04% l.93E-05 32.3 85 l.65E-0 4 0.03% 1.31E-05 33.655 l.36E-04 0.03% 8.90E-06 34.9 2 5 l.llE-04 0.02% 6.05E-06 5.37E-01 100.00% 6.36E-01 % of total I c um u l ative 2.75cm DRL % data 32.03% 32.03% l.96E-01 21.77% 53.80% l.24E-01 14.80% 68.60% 7.79E-02 10.06% 78.66% 4.91E-02 6.84% I 85.49% 3.09E-02 4.65% 90.14% l.95E-0 2 3.16% 93.30% l.23E-02 2.15% 95.45% 7.73E-03 1.46% I 96.90% 4.87E-03 0.99% 97.90% 3.07E-03 0.67% 98.57% 1.94E-03 0.46% I 99.03% l.22E-0 3 0.31% 99.34% 7.68E-04 0.2 1% 99.55% 4.84E-04 0.14% I 3.05E-04 0.10% I l.92E-04 0.07% l.2 1E-04 0.05% 7 , 63E-05 0.03% 4.81E-05 0.02% 3.03E-0 5 0.01% l.91E-05 0.01% l.20E-05 0.01% 7.59E-06 0.00% 4.78E-06 0.00% 3.0lE-06 0.00% 1.90E-06 0.00% l.20E-06 0.00% 7.54E-07 100.00% 5.30E-01 DO D ITilDOJ R CD [ ornooornoc

%of 1 cumu l a t ive total % 36.99% 36.99% 23.31% 60.29% 14.69% I 74.98% 9.25% 84.23% 5.83% 90.07% 3.67% 93.74% 2.32% 96.06% 1.46% 97.51% 0.92% 98.43% 0.58% 99.01% 0.37% 99.38% 0.23% 99.61% 0.14% 99.75% 0.09% 99.84% 0.06% I 0.04% 0.02% 0.01% 0.01% 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1 0 0.0 0%

Samples w/o top 1" cumulative Exp fit Depth cm Average % of total % data Source Term (Ci) 0.635 5.0SE-02 28.59% 28.59% 4.33E-02 1.905 2.85E-02 16.14% 44.73% 3.17E-02 3.175 2.30E-02 13.02% 57.75% 2.33E-02 4.445 1.65E-02 9.34% 67.09% 1. 71E-02 5.715 1.14E-02 6.45% 73.54% l.25E-02 6.985 1.25E-02 7.08% 80.62% 9.19E-03 8.2 55 4.86E-03 2.75% 83.37% 6.74E-03 9.525 8.8 5E-03 5.01% I 88.38% 4.94E-03 10.795 4.llE-03 2.33% I 90.71% 3.63E-03 12.065 3.26E-03 1.85% 92.55% 2.66E-03 13.335 2.60E-0 3 1.47% 94.03% l.95E-03 14.605 2.09E-03 1.18% 95.2 1% l.43E-03 15.875 1.6 8E-03 0.95% 96.16% l.05E-03 17.145 1.35E-03 0.76% 96.92% 7.70E-04 18.415 l.09E-03 0.62% 5.65E-04 19.685 8.82E-04 0.50% 4.14E-04 20.955 7.lSE-04 0.40% 3.04E-04 22.225 S.74E-04 0.32% 2.23 E-04 23.495 4.6 5 E-04 0.2 6% l.64E-04 + 24.765 3.77E-04 0.21% l.20E-04 26.035 3.06E-04 0.17% 8.80E-05 27.305 2.SOE-04 0.14% 6.45E-05 28.57 5 2.03E-04 0.11% 4.73E-05 29.845 1.6SE-04 0.09% 3.47E-05 31.115 1.36E-04 0.08% 2.55E-05 32.385 1.llE-04 0.06% l.87E-05 33.655 8.71E-05 0.05% l.37E-05 34.925 7.08E-05 0.04% l.OlE-05 1.77E-01 100.00% 1.62E-01 cumulative

% of total % 26.65% 26.65%

19.55% 46.20% 14.34% 60.54% 10.52% 71.06% 7.72% 78.78% 5.66% 84.44% 4.15% 88.59% 3.05% 91.63% 2.23% 93.87% 1.64% 95.51% 1.20% 96.71% 0.88% 97.59% 0.65% 98.24% 0.47% 98.71% 0.35% 0.26% 0.1 9% 0.14% 0.10% 0.0 7% 0.05% 0.04% 0.03% 0.02% 0.02% 0.01% 0.01% 0.01% 100.00% 2.75cm DRL data 4.0lE-02 2.53E-02 l.59E-02 l.OOE-02 6.32E-03 3.98E-03 2.51E-03 l.58E-03 DO D ITillDD R DD [ DDDDDDDDD[

%of cumulative total % 36.99% 36.99% 23.31% 60.29% 14.69% 74.98% 9.25% 84.23% 5.83% 90.0 7% 3.67% 93.74% 2.32% 96.06% 1.46% 97.51% 9.97E-0 4 t 0.92% 98.43% 6.28 E-04 0.58% 99.01% 3.96E-04 0.37% 99.38% 2.49E-04 0.23% 99.61% l.57E-04 0.14% 99.75% 9.90E-05 0.09% 99.84% 6.24E-05 I 0.06% 3.93E-05 0.04% 2.48E-05 0.02% l.56E-05 0.01% 9.84E-06 0.01% 6.2 0E-0 6 0.01% 3.91E-06 0.00% 2.46E-06 I 0.00% l.55E-06 0.00% 9.77E-07 0.00% 6.16E-07 0.00% 3.88E-07 0.00% 2.45E-07 0.00% l.54E-07 0.00% 1.0SE-01 100.00%

Sa m ples w/o top 2" %of cumulative Exp fit Depth cm Average total % data Source Term {Ci) 0.635 2.30E-0 2 23.56% 2 3.56% 2.05E-02 1.905 l.6SE-0 2 16.90% 40.46% l.62E-02 3.175 l.14E-0 2 11.68% 52.13% l.28E-02 4.445 l.2 SE-0 2 12.80% 64.94% l.02E-02 5.7 15 4.86E-0 3 4.98% 69.9 2% 8.04E-03 6.98 5 8.8 5E-0 3 9.06% 78.98% 6.3 6E-03 8.2 55 4.llE-03 4.21% 8 3.19% 5.04E-03 9.52 5 3.2 6E-0 3 3.34% 86.53% 3.99E-03 10.795 2.60E-0 3 2.66% 89.19% 3.16E-03 1 2.065 2.09E-0 3 2.14% 91.33% 2.50E-03 13.3 3 5 l.68E-0 3 1.72% 9 3.05% l.98E-03 14.605 l.3SE-0 3 1.38% 94.44% l.57E-03 15.8 75 l.09E-0 3 1.12% 9 5.55% 1.2 4E-03 17.145 8.8 2 E-0 4 0.90% 96.46% 9.81E-04 18.4 15 7.lSE-04 0.73% 97.19% I 7.77E-04 19.685 5.7 4E-0 4 0.59% 97.78% 6.15E-04 2 0.955 4.6SE-04 0.48% 98.2 5% 4.87E-04 22.225 3.77 E-0 4 0.39% 3.85E-04 2 3.4 95 3.06E-0 4 0.31% 3.05E-04 2 4.765 2.SOE-0 4 0.26% 2.41E-04 2 6.035 2.03E-04 0.21% l.91E-04 2 7.3 05 l.6SE-04 0.17% l.51E-04 2 8.5 75 l.36E-04 0.14% l.2 0E-04 2 9.84 5 l.llE-04 0.11% 9.48E-05 31.115 8.71E-OS 0.09% 7.50E-05 3 2.3 85 7.08E-OS 0.07% 5.94E-05 9.76E-02 100.00% 9.SOE-02 %of cumulative 2.75cm total % DRL data 20.89% 20.89% l.83E-02 16.53% 37.42% l.15E-02 13.09% 50.51% 7.25E-03 10.36% 60.87% 4.57E-03 8.20% 69.07% 2.88E-03 6.49% 75.57% l.81E-03 5.14% 80.71% l.14E-03 4.07% 84.77% 7.2 0E-04 3.22% 87.99% 4.54E-04 2.55% I 90.54% 2.86E-04 2.0 2% 9 2.56% l.80E-04 1.60% 94.16% l.14E-04 1.2 6% 95.43% 7.16E-05 1.00% I 96.43% 4.51E-05 0.79% 97.22% 2.84E-05 0.63% 97.85% l.79E-05 0.50% 98.34% l.13E-05 7.llE-06 4.48E-06 2.8 2 E-06 I l.78E-06 l.1 2 E-06 7.06E-07 4.45E-07 2.80E-07 I l.77E-07 4.94E-02 OD D [DJIIIJ R OD [ 000000000[

%of cumu l ative total % 36.99% 36.99% 23.31% 60.29% 14.69% 74.98% 9.25% 84.23% 5.83% 90.07% 3.67% 93.74% 2.32% 96.06% 1.46% 97.51% 0.92% 98.43% 0.58% 99.01% 0.37% 99.38% 0.23% 99.61% 0.14% 99.75% 0.09% 99.84% 0.06% 99.90% 0.04% 99.94% 0.02% 99.96%

DO D ITIJIIIJ R DD [ DODD DD DOD[ Attachment 2 Non-uniform Surface Efficiencies with CP Model Geometry Composer Report Date:

Description:

Comment: File Name: Software:

Template:

Detector:

Collimator:

Environment:

Integration:

No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 T uesday, March 14 , 2017 -09:28: 12 Te s t geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth con c rete 1 l ayer equal to 2.54 cm depth C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\CIRCULAR

_PLANE\Zion 2.54cm concrete.geo I SOCS CIRCULAR_PLANE , Vers i on: (def a ult) 5456 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50 m m side 90deg collimation

[large hole c olli m ator]) Te mperature

= 22 °C , Pressu r e = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30% Convergence

= 1.00%, MDRPN = 2 4 (16), CRPN = 2 4 (16) Dimensions (cm) Delatptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.5 d.I Matierllll Denllty S ide W a ll s 0 6 00 n o n e Lay e r 1 2.54 co n c r e t e 2.3 L ay e r 2 0 <no n e> Lay e r 3 0 <no n e> Lay e r 4 0 <n o n e> L ay e r 5 0 <no n e> L a yer 6 0 <no n e> L ay e r 7 0 <non e> La y er 8 0 <n on e> L ay er 9 0 <n o n e> L a yer 10 0 <n o n e> Ab so rb erl Ab so rb er 2 1 4 So ur c e-D e t ector 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 59.5 133 2.5 88.0 18 3 6.0 I r. List of energies for efficiency curve generation 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 898.0 11 73.2 -4 r// [( Pag e 1 of 2 Rel.Cone.

1.0 0 Geometry Composer Report Date:

Description:

Comment: File Name: Software:

Template:

Tuesday, March 14, 2 017 -09:28: 12 Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete 1 layer equal to 2.5 4 cm depth C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In

-Situ\CIRCULAR

_PLANE\Zion 2.54cm concrete.geo I SOCS CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)

Pag e 2 of 2 Geometry Composer Report Date:

Description:

Comment: File Name: Software:

Template:

Detector:

Collimator:

Environment:

Integration:

No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Tuesday, March 14, 2017 -09:19:13 Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete = 3m -1 foot 1 layer equal to 2.54 cm depth C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln

-Situ\CIRCULAR

_PLANE\Zion 2.54cm concrete-1 foot.gee I SOCS CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) 5456 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation

[large hole collimator])

Temperature

22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30% Convergence

1.00%, MDRPN = 2 4 (16), CRPN = 2 4 (16) Dimensions (cm) n.atptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.5 d.I Malllrlal Side Walls 0 600 none Layer 1 2.54 concrete Layer 2 0 <none> Laye r 3 0 <none> Layer 4 0 <none> Layer 5 0 <none> Laye r 6 0 <none> Layer 7 0 <none> Layer 8 0 <none> Layer 9 0 <none> Layer 10 0 <none> Absorber! Absorber 2 Denllty 2.3 14 S ource-Det ector 269.5 2 0 0 0 0 59.5 1332.5 88.0 1836.0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 Page 1of2 898.0 1173.2 Rel.Cone.

1.00 Geometry Composer Report Date:

Description:

Comment: File Name: Software:

Template:

v z. **. '* )( Tuesday, March 14, 2017 -09:19: 13 Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete= 3m -1 foot 1 layer equal to 2.54 cm depth C: \GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In

-Situ\CIRCULAR

_PLANE\Zion 2.54cm concrete-1 foot.gee I SOCS CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)

Page 2 of 2 RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS F ile: ISOCS/LABSOCS DO D ornmo R OD [ C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\CIRCULAR ISOCS/L abSOCS Time: 03/14/17 09: 28: 04 -Template: CIRCULAR PLANE Geom

Description:

Zion 2.54cm Comment: Zion 2.54cm Detector:

5456 Coll imat or: 50M M-90D NEW Convergence

1.00 % Area [Sq Meters]: 2.8274e+001 (C) Mass [Grams]: l.6877e+006 (C) Length [Meters] : not us ed (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency

%U ncertainty 59.54 3.7 5877e-006 10.0 88.03 5.08373e-006 10.0 122.06 5.27 1 70e-006 10.0 165.85 5.07193e-006 8.0 391.69 3.57881e-006 8.0 66 1.65 2.84879e-006 6.0 898.02 2.51718e-006 6.0 1173.22 2.23913e-006 4.0 1332.49 2.12014e-006 4.0 1836.01 l.78650e-006 4.0 %Co nvergence Final -0.426258 -0.473965 -0.540782 -0.578253 -0.521853

-0.502048

-0.470993 -0.442835 -0.42099 1 -0.386185 # of Voxels 1628 1628 1628 1628 1628 1628 1628 1628 1628 1628 2.:

ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS OD O DOJIIIJ R DD C ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\CIRCULAR ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 03/14/17 09:19: 08 Template:

CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description

Zion 2.54cm-lft Comment: Zion 2.54cm-lft Detector:

5456 Collimator

50MM-90D NEW Convergence
1.00 % Area [Sq Meters]: 2.8274e+001 (C) Mass [Grams]: 1.6877e+006 (C) Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency

%Uncertainty 59.54 4.18018e-006 10.0 88.03 5.66 1 38e-006 10.0 122.06 5.8764le-006 10.0 165.85 5.62460e-006 8.0 391.69 3.91979e-006 8.0 661.65 3.10172e-006 6.0 898.02 2.73366e-006 6.0 1173.22 2.42873e-006 4.0 1332.49 2.29857e-006 4.0 1836.01 l.93545e-006 4.0 %Convergence Final # of Voxels -0.223797 17556 -0.182341 17556 -0.181125 17556 -0.187260 17556 -0.225971 17556 -0.247587 17556 -0.255239 17556 -0.259371 17556 -0.258321 17556 -0.259668 17556 2.:

Geometry Composer Report Date:

Description:

Comment: File Name: Softwa r e: Template:

Detector:

Collimator:

Environment:

Integration:

Tuesday, March 14, 2017 -09:13:12 Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete 1 layer equal to 1.27 cm depth C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\CIRCULAR

_PLANE\Zion l.27cm concrete.geo I SOCS CIRCULAR_PLANE , Version: (default) 5456 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation

[large hole collimator])

Temperature

= 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30% Convergence

= 1.00%, MDRPN = 2 4 (16), CRPN = 2 4 (16) Dimensions (cm) No. Dela'lptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.S d.I DM8lty 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 59.5 1332.5 Side Walls Layer 1 Layer 2 Layer 3 Layer 4 Layer 5 Layer 6 Layer 7 Layer 8 Layer 9 Layer 10 Absorberl Absorber 2 Source-Detector 88.0 1836.0 I (.

JI :.R Pl A IF 0 600 none 1.27 concrete 2.3 0 <none> 0 <none> 0 <n one> 0 <none> 0 <none> 0 <none> 0 <none> 0 <none> 0 <none> 300 0 0 0 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 898.0 1173.2 Page 1of2 Rel.Cone:.

1.00 oo r:Arm R ooc Geometry Composer Report Date:

Description:

Comment: File Name: Software:

Template:

y z * ..... >: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 -09: 13: 12 Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete 1 lay e r equal to 1.27 cm depth C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In

-Situ\CIRCULAR

_PLANE\Zion l.27cm concrete.geo I SOCS CIRCULAR_PLANE , Version: (default)

Pag e 2 of 2 Geometry Composer Report Date:

Description:

Comment: File Name: Software:

Template:

Detector:

Collimator:

Environment:

Integration:

No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 1 3 Tuesday, March 14, 2017 -09:10:45 Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete = 3m -1 foot 1 layer equal to 1.27 cm depth C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In

-Situ\CIRCULAR

_PLANE\Zion 1.27cm concrete-1 foot.geo !SOCS CIRCULAR_PLANE , Version: (default) 5456 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation

[large hole collimator])

Temperature

= 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30% Convergence

= 1.00%, MDRPN = 2 4 (16), CRPN = 2 4 (16) Dimensions (cm) Delatptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.S d.I Mlltlertal Side Walls 0 600 non e Lay er 1 1.2 7 c on c r e te Layer 2

  • 0 <none> Lay e r 3 0 <none> Layer 4 0 <none> Layer 5 0 <none> Layer 6 0 <none> Layer 7 0 <non e> Layer 8 0 <none> Layer 9 0 <none> Lay e r 10 0 <non e> Ab s orberl Absorb e r 2 Denllty 2.3 1 4 Source-D e t ector 269.52 0 0 0 0 59.5 1332.5 88.0 1836.0 I (. JI Pl A I F List of energies for efficiency curve generation 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 -4 , r?--cr Page 1of 2 898.0 1173.2 bl.Cone. 1.0 0 Geometry Composer Report Date:

Description:

Comment: File Name: Software:

Template:

y Tuesday, March 14, 2017 -09: 10:45 Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete = 3m -1 foot 1 layer equal to 1.27 cm depth C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In

-Situ\CIRCULAR

_PLANE\Zion 1.27cm concrete-1 foot.geo I SOCS CIRCULAR_PLANE , Version: (default)

z. **. *. x Page 2 of 2 ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS OD D ITilillJ R rn [ ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\CIRCULAR ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 03/14/17 09: 13: 07 Template: CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description
Zion l.27cm Comment: Zion l.27cm Detector: 5456 Collimator
50MM-90D NEW Convergence:

1.00 % Area [Sq Meters]: 2.8274e+001 (C) Mass [Grams]: 8.4385e+005 (C) Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency

%Uncertainty 59.54 5.64561e-006 r 10.0 88.03 6.77731e-006 10.0 122.06 6.71355e-006 10.0 165.85 6.25215e-006 8.0 391. 69 4.20224e-006 8.0 661.65 3.25166e-006 6.0 898.02 2.80927e-006 6.0 1173.22 2.46740e-006 4.0 1332.49 2.32324e-006 4.0 1836.01 l.93213e-006 4.0 %Conve rgence Fi n al # of Voxels 0.498601 1618 0.463116 1618 0.472362 1618 -0.674072 814 -0.116124 406 0.157028 406 -0.697293 814 -0.684715 814 -0.666609 814 -0.639529 814 1. L ISOCS/LabSOCS File: ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS DO D OOilJO R DD [ C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\CIRCULAR Jl 1 N2 zq_=i5 n 03/14/17 09: 10:40 Template: CIRCULAR PLANE Geom D escript i on: Zion l.27cm-l ft Comment: Zion l.27cm-l ft Detector: 5456 Collimator

50MM-90D NEW Convergence
1.00 % Area [Sq Meters]: 2.8274e+001 (C) / Mass [Grams]: 8.4385e+005 (C) Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Ef ficiency %Uncertainty 59.54 6.31442e-006 10.0 88.0 3 7.57837e-006 10.0 122.06 7.4 9551e-006 10.0 165.85 6.977 96e-006 8.0 391. 69 4.59768e-006 8.0 661.65 3.53048e-006 6.0 898.02 3.061 63e-0 06 6.0 1173.22 2.6844le-006 4.0 1332.4 9 2.5 2581e-006 4.0 1836.01 2.09812 e-006 4.0 %Converge nc e Final # of Voxels -0.2496 4 9 87 7 8 -0.253382 8778 -0.254293 8778 -0.258073 8778 -0.284344 8778 -0.301798 8778 -0.307864 8778 -0.311473 8778 -0.309709 8778 -0.311376 8778 1. L OD D ITilIIJ R DD [ DODD DO DOD[ Attachment 3 Non-uniform Surface Efficiencies with ECP Model oo rAru R ooc Geometry Composer Report f!ifRA Date:

Description:

Comment: File Name: Software:

Template:

Detector:

Collimator:

Environment:

Integration:

No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 T uesday, March 14 , 2017 -13: 09:31 ECP model defined i n TSD 14-022 C:\GENIE2K\iso cs\data\GEOMETRY\ln

-Situ\EXPONENT

_CIRCULAR_PLANE\Zion all concrete data.geo I SOCS EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE , Version: (default) 5 4 56 50mm-90d new (n e wISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation

[large hole collimator])

T e mperature

= 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg , Relative Humidity = 30% Co n vergence= 1.00%, MDRPN = 2 4 (16), CRPN = 2 4 (16) Dimensions (cm) Dwriptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 cL4 d.5 d.I Metlerllll Side Wall s 0 600 non e La yer 1 0 no n e L a yer 2 0 non e Lay er 3 0 non e S ourc e L a y e r 5.8 0 2.7 5 c oncret e Abs o rb er! 0.3 hpoly e th Abs o r ber 2 Denllty ...a.cane.

2.3 1.0 0 0.9 5 8 Source-D et e ct o r 300 0 0 0 0 59.5 1332.5 88.0 18 3 6.0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 12 2.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 898.0 !EXPONENTIAL CIRCULAR PLANE I c .Q 1---!bln:.to \Ap r l?*i cir.* (5..1) -----< 11.0-<.> 0.5-< Dept h ## l'hr* I I ( .. -

--Page 1o f2 0 .......... 0 CO nMr lt'" c n 1173.2 Geometry Composer Report Date:

Description:

Comment: File Name: Software:

Template:

z* y .. ' Tuesday, March 14, 2017 -13:09:31 ECP model defined in TSD 14-022 C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\EXPONENT

_CIRCULAR_PLANE\Zion all concrete data.geo I SOCS EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE , Version: (default)

Page 2 of 2 oo rlJ.m R mc Geometry Composer Report Date:

Description:

Comment: File Name: Software:

Template:

Detector:

Collimator:

Environment:

Integration:

No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Tuesday, March 14, 2017 -13:12:3 1 ECP model without top inch data exponetial curve fit of data without top 2 layer s C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\EXPONENT

_CIRCULAR_P ... \Zion concrete data minus lin.geo I SOCS EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) 5456 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimat ion [large hole collimator])

Temperature

= 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30% Convergence

= 1.00%, MDRPN = 2 4 (16), CRPN = 2 4 (16) Dimensions (cm) Delatptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.S d.I ........ Side Walls 0 600 none Layer 1 0 none Layer 2 0 none Layer 3 0 none Source Layer 9.5 0 4.1 concrete Absorber l 0.3 hpolyeth Absorber2 o.n.lty bl.Cone. 2.3 1.00 0.95 8 Source-Detector 300 0 0 0 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 1332.5 88.0 1836.0 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 I EXPONEN TI AL CIRCULAR PLANE I Page 1of2 y t ,,. x k:.:." __ z 5.5 j___ A 898.0 1173.2 ***1 Geometry Composer Report Date: Descrip t ion: Comment: File Name: Software:

Templa t e: y Tuesday , March 14 , 2017 -13:12:31 ECP model without top inch data exponetial curve fit of data without top 2 layers C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln

-Situ\EXPONENT

_CIRCULAR_PLANE\Zion concrete data minus lin.gec I SOCS EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)

z. **. '* }( Page 2 of 2 Geometry Composer Report Date: Descrip t ion: Comment: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 -13:14:34 ECP model without top two inches data exponetial curve fit of data without top 4 layers File Name: Software:

C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\EXPONENT

_CIRCU LAR_P ... \Zion concrete data minus 2in.geo I SOCS Template:

Detector:

Collimator:

Environment:

Integra t ion: No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) 5456 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation

[large hole collimator])

Temperature

= 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30% Convergence

= 1.00%, MDRPN = 2 4 (16), CRPN = 2 4 (16) Dimensions (cm) Deealptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 d.4 d.5 d.I Mnmtlil Side Walls 0 600 non e Layer 1 0 none Layer 2 0 none Layer 3 0 non e Sou rce Laye r 12.1 0 5.43 c oncrete Absorber!

0.3 hpolyeth Absorber 2 8 Source-Detector 3 00 0 0 0 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 1332.5 88.0 1836.0 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 I EXPONENTIAL CIRCULAR PLANE I Page 1of2 y

  • x : ,; l.e.:_' __ z .... J__ A 898.0 Demlty Rel. Cone. 2.3 1.00 0.95 1173.2 Geometry Composer Report Date: Descrip t ion: Comment: File Name: Software:

Template:

y Tuesday, March 14, 2017 -13:14:34 ECP model without top two inches data exponetial curve fit of data without top 4 layers C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\EXPONENT

_CI RCULAR_PLANE\Zion concrete data minus 2in.gec I SOCS EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)

z. . .... )( Pag e 2 of 2 ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS DO D ITIJIIlJ R rn C ISOCS/LabSOCS File: D []JO []] []JO[ C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In

-Situ\EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 03/14/17 13:09:27 -Template:

EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description

ECP -all Comment: ECP -all Detector: 5456 Collimator
50MM-90D NEW Convergence
1.00 % Area [Sq Meters]: 2.8274e+001 (C) Mass [Grams]: 3.8538e+006 (C) Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by us e r Energy Efficiency

%Uncertainty 59.54 2.9702le-006 10.0 88.03 4.05452e-006 10.0 122.06 4.27633e-006 10.0 165.85 4.17178e-006 8.0 391. 69 3.06932e-006 8.0 661.65 2.50292e-006 6.0 898.02 2.2425le-006 6.0 1173.2 2 2.01893e-006

4. 0 1332.49 l.92199e-006 4.0 1836.01 l.6410le-006 4.0 %Convergence Final # of Voxels -0.069336 3256 -0.172904 3256 -0.285085 3256 -0.316471 3256 -0.072996 1624 -0.110487 1624 -0.094005 1624 -0.129291 1624 -0.1 2 119 6 1624 -0.122452 1624 ISOCS/LABSOCS DO D DDDDDO R DDC ISOCS/LabSOCS File: ODDO DD DDOC C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In

-Situ\EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 03/14/17 13:12:27 Template: EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE Geom

Description:

ECP -1 inch Comment: ECP -1 inch Detector: 5456 Collimator

50MM-90D NEW Convergence:

1.0 0 % Area [Sq Meters]: 2.8274e+001 (C) Mass [Grams]: 6.3123e+006 (C) Length [MetersJ : not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy E fficiency

%Uncertainty 59.54 2.11252e-006 10.0 88.03 3.02610e-006 10.0 122.06 3.27 820e-006 10.0 165.85 3.2 5344e-006 8.0 391. 69 2.49367e-006 8.0 661.65 2.09236e-006 6.0 898.02 l.90647e-006 6.0 1173.22 1. 74165e-006 4.0 1332.49 l.66929e-006 4.0 1836.01 1.44868e-006 4.0 %Convergence Final # of Voxels -0.392368 4070 -0.1 99891 4070 -0.160452 4070 -0.168155 4070 -0.177398 4070 -0.225467 4070 -0.224983 4070 -0.223042 4070 -0.212203 4070 -0.194054 4070 ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS DO D DOillJ R OJ [ ISOCS/LabSOCS File: DODD DD DOD[ C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 03/14/17 13: 14: 28 Template: EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description

ECP -2 inches ECP -2 inches 5456 Comment: Detector: Collimator
50MM-90D NEW Convergence
1.00 % Area [Sq Meters]: 2.8274e+001 (C) Mass [Grams]: 8.0398e+006 (C) Length [Meters]: not used {C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency

%Uncertainty 59.54 1. 70981e-006 10.0 88.03 2.51042e-006 10.0 122.06 2.75518e-006 10.0 165.85 2.75980e-006 8.0 3 91. 69 2.15955e-006 8.0 661.65 l.84187e-006 6.0 898.02 l.69650e-006 6.0 1173.22 1.56509e-006 4.0 1332.49 1.50695e-006 4.0 1836.01 l.32264e-006 4.0 %Convergence Final # of Voxels -0.140384 9708 -0.098247 9708 -0.512290 4 8 84 -0.515849 4884 -0.62035 5 4 88 4 -0.6121 2 1 4884 -0.568575 4 8 84 -0.530638 4 8 84 -0.50494 3 4884 -0.456810 4 8 84 Geometry Composer Report oo rAru R ooc Date:

Description:

Comment: File Name: Software:

Template:

Detector:

Collimator:

Environment:

Integration:

No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Thursday, March 16, 2017 -08: 04: 15 ECP model defined in TSO 14-022 3 meters minus 1 foot C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data

\GEOM ETRY\In-Situ\EXPONENT

_CIRCU LAR_PLANE\Zion all concrete data-lft.geo I SOCS EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE , Version: (default) 5456 50mm-90d new (newI SOCS 50mm side 90deg collim ation [large hole collimator])

Temperature

= 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30% Convergence

= 1.00%, MDRPN = 2 4 (16), CRPN = 2 4 (16) Dimensions (cm) o.atptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.5 d.I Mnerlal Side Walls 0 600 non e Layer 1 0 none Layer 2 0 none Layer 3 0 none So ur ce Layer 5.8 0 2.75 concrete Absorber!

0.3 hpolyeth Absorber2 uenlllY 'K91.Conc:.

2.3 1.00 0.95 8 Source-Detector 2 69.52 0 0 0 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 1332.5 88.0 1836.0 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 I EXPONENTIAL C l RCU LAR PLANE I Deptl'I Pag e 1 of 2 898.0 1173.2 Geometry Composer Report Date:

Description:

Comment: File Name: Software:

Template:

Thursday, March 16 , 2017 -08:04: 15 ECP model defined in TSD 14-022 3 meters minus 1 foot C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\EXPONENT

_CIRCULAR_PLANE\Zion all concrete data-lft.geo I SOCS EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) 4 Page 2 of 2

Geometry Composer Report Date: Descrip t ion: Comment: File Name: Software:

Templa t e: Detector:

Collima t or: Environment:

Integration:

No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Thursday, March 16, 2017 -08:08:21 ECP model without top inch data (3 meters-1 foot distance) exponetial curve fit of data without top 2 layers C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\EXPONENT

_CIRCULA ... \Zion ECP data minus lin and lft.geo I SOCS EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_PLANE , Version: (default) 5456 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation

[large hole collimator])

Temperature

= 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg , Relative Humidity = 30% Co n vergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 2 4 (16), CRPN = 2 4 (16) Dimensions (cm) Dwriplion d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.5 d.I MneNI Side Wall s 0 600 none Lay er 1 0 non e Lay e r 2 0 n on e Lay er 3 0 none Source Lay er 9.5 0 4.1 c oncrete Ab so rb e r! 0.3 h p oly e th Absorb e r 2 Denllty Rel. Cone. 2.3 1.00 0.9 5 8 S ource-D e t ector 269.52 0 0 0 0 59.5 1332.5 88.0 1836.0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 12 2.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 I EXPO NENTI AL CIRCULAR PLA N E I f 0.5-< _!_ Dm cix C J.2. ,. o r-1 D a ptl'I Pag e 1o f2 e e 898.0 1173.2 Geometry Composer Report C.BJ<ilfl Date:

Description:

Comment: File Name: Software:

Templa t e: Thursday, March 16, 2017 -08:08:21 ECP model without top inch data (3 meters-1 foot distance) exponetial curve fit of data without top 2 layers C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\EXPONENT

_CIRCULAR_ ... \Zion ECP data minus lin and lft.geo I SOCS EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)

Page 2 of 2 Geometry Composer Report Date: Descrip t ion: Comment: File Name: Software:

Templa t e: Detector:

Collima t or: Environment:

Integration:

No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Thursday, March 16, 2017 -08: 11:39 ECP model without top two inches data (3 meters -1 foot distance) exponential curve fit of data without top 4 layers C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln

-Situ\EXPONENT

_CIRCULA ... \Zion ECP data minus 2in and 1 ft.g e o I SOCS EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE , Version: (default) 5456 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation

[large hole collimator])

Temperature

= 22 °C , Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30% Convergence

= 1.00%, MDRPN = 2 4 (16), CRPN = 2 4 (16)

  • Dimensions (cm) Delatptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.S d.I .........

S id e Wall s 0 600 none Lay er 1 0 none Layer 2 0 non e Lay e r 3 0 n o n e Sour ce L a y e r 12.1 0 5.4 3 co n c r e t e Ab s orb erl 0.3 hpoly e th Ab s orber 2 Dendy Rel.Cone.

2.3 1.00 0.9 5 8 So ur ce-D e t ecto r 26 9.52 0 0 0 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 1332.5 88.0 1836.0 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 898.0 I E X PONENTIAL C IR C ULAR PLANE I _!__ Dm!D: :l.2. ,.. (oc:) Oept l'I Page 1o f2 y t x ' ,,, k.:." __ z a.s A 0 """" e CO n'i'tl'lt'" c n 1173.2 Geometry Composer Report Date: Descrip t ion: Comment: File Name: Software:

Templa t e: Thursday, March 16 , 2017 -08:11:39 ECP model without top two inches data (3 meters -1 foot distance) exponential curve fit of data without top 4 layers C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\EXPONENT_CIRCULAR

... \Zion ECP data minus 2in and 1 ft.gee I SOCS EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) Page 2 of 2 DO D ITilIIJ R rn C ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In

-Situ\EXPONENT C1fRC:fR ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 03/16/17 08: 04:10 ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS Template: EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description

ECP-all-lft Comment: ECP-all-lft Detector: 5 4 5 6 Collimator
50MM-90D NEW Convergence
1.00 % Area [Sq Meters]: 2.8274e+001 (C) Mass [Grams]: 3.8538e+006 (C) Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user PLANE Energy Efficiency

%Uncerta i nty %C onvergence Final # of Voxels 59.54 3.26640e-006 10.0 -0.340638 35112 88.03 4.46862e-006 1 0.0 -0.219499 35112 122.06 4.71711e-006 10.0 -0.178969 351 12 165.85 4.58166e-006 8.0 -0.173263 35112 391. 69 3.32283e-006 8.0 -0.140550 35112 661.65 2.69668e-006 6.0 -0.132562 35112 898.02 2.41189e-006 6.0 -0.140077 35112 1173.22 2.17001e-006 4.0 -0.149687 35112 1332.49 2.06556e-006 4.0 -0.152607 35112 1836.01 1. 76347e-006 4.0 -0.161610 351 12 RESULTS ISOCS/LABSOCS OD D ITilIIIJ R DD [ ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE 2K\iso cs\d at a\GEOMETR Y\In-Situ\EXP ONENT e........._H,Jl,-l r L.1.-'.+pLANE ISOCS/L abSOCS Time: 03/16/17 08: 08: 16 Template:

EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description

ECP-lin-lft Comment: ECP-lin-lft Detector: 5456. Co llima tor: 50 MM-90D NEW Convergence:

1.00 % Area [Sq Meters]: 2.8274e+001 (C) M ass [Grams]: 6.3123e+006 (C) Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modi fied by user Energy Efficiency

%Uncertainty 59.54 2.36918e-006 10.0 88.03 3.38274e-00 6 10.0 122.06 3.65655e-0 06 10.0 165.85 3.61159e-006 8.0 391.69 2.72798e-006 8.0 661.65 2.27302e-0 06 6.0 898.02 2.06570e-006 6.0 1173.22 1.88487e-0 06 4.0 1332.49 l.80587e-006 4.0 1836.01 l.56650e-006 4.0 %Convergence Final # of Voxels -0.109036 43890 -0.104530 43890 -0.073812 43890 -0.078445 43890 -0.080835 43890 -0.104310 43890 -0.126119 43890 -0.145392 43890 -0.152263 43890 -0.166874 43890 ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS DO D ITIIIIIJ R DD C ISOCS/LabSOCS File: DDDDDDDDDC C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In

-Situ\EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 03/16/17 08: 11: 34 -Template: EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description

ECP-2in-lft Comment: ECP-2in-lft Detector: 5456 Colli m ator: 50MM-90D NEW Convergence
1.00 % Area [Sq Meters]: 2.8274e+001 (C) Mass [Grams]: 8.0398e+006 (C) Length [Meters]: not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency

%Uncertainty 59.54 1.90780e-006 10.0 88.03 2.79289e-006 10.0 122.06 3.06133e-006 10.0 165.85 3.05304e-006 8.0 391. 69 2.36557e-006 8.0 661.65 2.00554e-006 6.0 898.02 l.84216e-006 6.0 1173.22 l.69698e-006 4.0 1332.49 l.63318e-006 4.0 1836.01 1.43248e-006 4.0 %Convergence Final # of Voxels -0.249249 52668 -0.203908 52668 -0.184079 52668 -0.163807 52668 -0.140595 52668 -0.170948 52668 -0.189144 52668 -0.203167 52668 -0.207162 52668 -0.216558 52668

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17194A337&oldid=833088"