ML17194A337
| ML17194A337 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zion File:ZionSolutions icon.png |
| Issue date: | 03/22/2017 |
| From: | Houff J ZionSolutions |
| To: | John Hickman, Vaaler M Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards |
| References | |
| TSD-17-003, Rev 0 | |
| Download: ML17194A337 (49) | |
Text
Hickman, John From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Jerry X. Houff <jxhouff@energysolutions.com >
Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:26 AM Hickman, John; Vaaler, Marlayna Nick Williams
[External_Sender] NRC Submittal Documents TSD-17-003 Rev 0 - Evaluation of Efficiency Calibration Geometries for In-Situ Gamma Spectrometry During FSS.pdf John, Second Document for 1300 meeting.
Jerry Houff ZionSolutions Licensing Manager jxhouff@enrgysolutions.com Work Phone (224)789-4090 Cell Phone (860)608-6408 1
ZionSolutions, Inc.
Technical Support Document TSD 17-003 Evaluation of Efficiency Calibration Geometries for In-Situ Gamma Spectrometry During Final Status Surveys Revision 0 f4L1fL,Juk_
Originator: __ (_ kff_!!i j ________ Date: 21-Mar-17 Pete Hollenbeck Reviewer: ----1.~,.--=-1<L--=--~
-*-=--=-o--~----:::::>--
-___ Date: 21-Mar-1 7 Eric Darois Approval: ______________ Date: ______ _
Robert Yetter
Summary of Changes in this Revision:
- Rev. 0 - Initial issuance.
DOD ITIIlIJ ROD [
DODD ODDO[
Table of Contents ODD CIIJDOO R DD [
00000000[
I.
PURPOSE................................................................................................................................. 4
- 2.
DISCUSSION........................................................................................................................... 4
- 3.
EFFICIENCY EVALUATIONS.............................................................................................. 6
- 3. 1.
Exponential Circular Plane Model................................................................................ 6 3.2.
Non-uniform Surfaces................................................................................................. 10
- 4.
CONCLUS IONS.................................................................................................................... 12
- 5.
REFERENCES....................................................................................................................... 12
- 6.
ATTACHM ENTS................................................................................................................... 12 List of Tables Table I - Survey Areas with Pre-established !SOCS Geometry Models....................................... 4 Table 2 - ECP Model Comparisons.............................................................................................. I 0 Table 3 - 2.54cm CP Model Efficiency Comparison................................................................... 11 Table 4 - I.27cm CP Model Efficiency Comparison.................................................................... 11 Table 5 - 3 Meter ECP Model Efficiency Comparison................................................................ 11 Table 6 - 3 Meter Minus I Foot ECP Model Efficiency Comparison......................................... 11 Table 7 - Two Distances ECP Model Efficiency Comparison..................................................... 12 List of Figures Figure I - All Sample Data............................................................................................................ 7 Figure 2 - All Sample Data Without Top Inch............................................................................... 8 Figure 3 - All Sample Data Without Top Two Inches................................................................... 9
- 1.
PURPOSE DOD (()))))) Rrn [
ornoornoc The purpose of this Technical Support Document (TSO) is summarize the evaluations performed to address the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) Request for Additional Information (RAI) on how a surveyor will determine ifthe geometry of remaining residual radioactivity is significantly different from that which was assumed in TSO 14-022.
A review of the recommendations in TS D 14-022 shows that only four areas have the geometry template for final surveys established. The geometry definitions, as provided in Table I, use variables contained in the ISOCS Geometry Composer defined as:
ECP Model: Exponential Circular Plane geometry, where DRL is the relaxation length for the exponential distribution; the depth at which the activity concentration falls by a factor of 1 /e from DMAX, and DMAX is the depth at which the maximum activity concentration occurs.
CP Model: Circular Plane Model where the depth profile can be set for various distributions (including linear) and a discrete depth.
Table 1 - Survey Areas with Pre-established ISOCS Geometry Models Location Status Auxiliary Basement ECP model with DRL = 2.75cm, DMAX = Ocm and source depth of Floor 5.8cm Containment Basement CP model set for liner with a source thickness of O. I 53cm.
Turbine Building and model set - CP with 2.54cm total main steam tunnels depth Crib House, Forebay, model set - CP with I.27cm total and Circulating Water depth Intake Pipes The remaining areas have recommendations to characterize when they become accessible and available.
Evaluations of the effects of remediation to the Auxiliary Building basement concrete depth profile in the Exponential Circular Plane (ECP) model and the of non-uniform surfaces are presented below.
- 2.
DISCUSSION The NRC provided the following RAI to Zion:
The previous HP RAJ 6 comments (as provided to the licensee in May 2016) note that there is an apparent discrepancy between recommendations from the licensee's TSD 022 (Revision 0) document and the LTP with regard to additional core sampling to validate the limited core data currently available or to provide new data in areas that are
ODD ITIIIIIJ R ITJ [
DITJD D ITJD[
considered to have a unique operational history or contamination profile. The licensee's response, as provided in July 2016, indicates that such core samples may not be taken and that the necessity to validate the geometry for ISOCs efficiency calibration is addressed as Step 4.2.7 of ZS-LT-300-001-001 (Revision 2), "FRS Package Development." This procedure simply directs the surveyor to "review post remediation conditions and surveys to determine if the geometry ofremaining residual radioactivity has significantly changed from that assumed in TSD 14-022," and that "if the geometry appears to be significantly different from that which was assumed in TSD 14-022, then inform the C/LT Manager."
There appears to be no definition or procedure to direct the surveyor in making this assessment or a description of what constitutes a significant change from assumptions.
As such, the proposed approach does not provide an adequate justification as to why the core samples recommended by TSD 14-022 may not be necessary. Details on the methods and procedures the STS surveyor will follow to assess differences in geometry should be provided.
It is additionally important that the NRC understand the usage of core samples on a per survey unit basis, and details on the !SOCS geometry utilized within a survey unit should be presented in any Final Status Survey Report (FSSR) provided to the NRC.
Zion provided the following response:
There are two aspects of the concrete geometry that will be reviewed during FSS design to determine if there are significant differences from the Exponential Circular Plane (ECP) geometry selected in TSO 14-022 to perform the efficiency calibration for general areas. As listed in TSO 14-014, section 7, there are four areas that required further characterization to confirm that the ECP applies or, if a different geometry should be used for the efficiency calibration. There are two geometry considerations; I) the uniformity, or smoothness of the surface, and 2) the distribution of contamination with depth. The ECP efficiency calibration assumes a smooth surface. This assumption will be used if remediation does not result causing significant non-uniformities in the concrete surface, such as trenches, deep gouges, etc. that would produce a "wall edge", which causes significant photon shielding between the source at the bottom of the trench or gouge and the ISOCS detector. An assessment will be performed using the !SOCS geometry composer to determine a set of measurable parameters for the engineer to apply in the field to assess ifthe surface geometry is significantly different from the ECP assumption of smooth surface. The parameters will be added to the Procedure ZS-LT-300-001-00 I (Revision 2), "FRS Package Development". A standard acceptance criteria for instrument variability applied to source checks is +/- 20%. A lower value of I 0% will be applied in setting the parameters for designating a remediated area as non-uniform.
The I 0% criterion will apply to the difference between the efficiency values for the non-uniform geometry and the efficiency values for the ECP geometry. If the efficiency value for the non-uniform geometry is more than I 0% lower than the ECP geometry, then an area-specific efficiency calibration geometry will be applied to the affected area. A description of the condition of the surfaces measured by !SOCS during FSS, and the geometry applied for the efficiency calibration in the affected area will be described in
DOD ITilIJOO ROD [
00000000[
the FSS Final Report. The second geometry consideration is the distribution of contamination with depth. During survey qesign, the cores collected from the areas recommended in TSO 14-022 will be reviewed. The actual measured values in the new cores, the 0.5 inch core slices, will be used in the ISOCS geometry composer directly to determine the actual efficiency based on the core data. The differences between actual efficiency and the ECP efficiency will be evaluated. As for the assessment of surface uniformity, if the efficiency based on core data is more than I 0% lower than the ECP efficiency, the core data will be used as the basis for the efficiency calibration in the affected area. A description of the core assessment and the geometry applied for the efficiency calibration in the affected area will be described in the FSS Final Report.
Procedure ZS-L T-300-001-00 I will be updated to include the parameters for evaluating uniformity and the contamination depth profile after the parameters for determining when a surface is "non-uniform" have been selected. The assessment performed to select the parameters will be documented in a TSO along with the process for evaluating the depth profile efficiency using new cores. The TSO and revised procedure will be provided to NRC when completed.
- 3.
EFFICIENCY EVALUATIONS 3.1.
Exponential Circular Plane Model The first step in the evaluation was to use the depth and activity data from Table 2 in TSO 14-022 and re-produce the analysis. Figure I presents the graphical analysis of the
- Table 2 data. The red curve is a plot of the All Core Sample Average Source Term data in (Ci) vs sample depth. Each core was sliced into 0.5 inch thick pucks. The average source term value was assigned to the depth of half the puck thickness. The 2. 75cm DRL curve was calculated by the following equation:
-x; A= A0 e L
Where A = activity at depth x Ao= Cmax = 0.247 Ci from Table 2 in TSO 14-022 L = DRL = 2.75cm X = depth in cm
DOD ITilIIlJ R DD [
DODD ODDO[
3.00E-01 2.SOE-01 2.00E-01 Q
E Q) l.SOE-01 I-Q) u...
- s 0
l.OOE-01 Vl 5.00E-02 O.OOE+OO 0
0 Figure 1 - All Sample Data All Samples Average Source Term (Ci) 0 0
0 0
N rn All data exp fit equation: y = 0.247e o.304x R2 = 0.9188 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
-<i U")
<.D 00 CJ'\\
ci N
rn
-<i 0
0 Cl 0
U")
<.D Depth (cm)
~ Se n esl Ser1es.2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Cl Cl 0
00 CJ'\\
ci N
rn N
N N
N
- * * * * * * *
- f)(pon. {Seriesl) 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Cl U")
ID N
N N
N This graph is in agreement with the graph presented in TSO 14-022 and shows that the 2.75cm Depth of the Relaxation Length (DRL) curve is a much better fit to the data than the exponential curve calculated by Excel.
The next steps were to remove the data from the top two layers (I inch) and the top 4 layers (2 inches) to represent the results from remediation. These evaluations were performed to determine if any limited remediation would change the geometry and efficiencies of the ECP model. After removing the activity data, the depths were re-set represent the top layers. Figures 2 and 3 present the graphical analysis of the effects of removal of the top inch and top 2 inches, respectively.
0 0
oci N
6.00E-02 5.00E-02 4.00E-02 Q
E Qj 3.00E-02 I-Qj u...
- I 0
VI 2.00E-02 l.OOE-02 0.00E+OO Figure 2 - All Sample Data Without Top Inch Samples w/o Top 1" Average Source Term (Ci)
Sample data exponential fit: y = 0.0505e--0 144*
R2 = 0.9864 DOD ITIIIIIJ R DD [
00000 000[
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Depth (cm)
__._ Seriesl
--e-5eries2
- Expon. (Seriesl)
DOD ITililJ ROD [
DODOO ODD[
2.50E-02 2.00E-02
-Q E l.50E-02
<11 1-(11 v...
- J 0
VI l.OOE-02 5.00E-03 O.OOE+OO 0
Figure 3 - All Sample Data Without Top Two Inches Samples w/o Top 2" Average Sou rce Term (Ci)
Sample data exponential fit: y = 0.023e o. is<x R2 = 0.9896 5
10 15 20 Depth (cm)
~ Samp l es w/o top 2" Average Source Term (Ci)
~
2.75cm DRL data 25
- Expon. (Samples w/o top 2" Average Source Term (Ci))
30 Both Figures 2 and 3 have the same 2.75cm DRL curve as shown on Figure 1 and the Excel exponential fitted curve of the data. Review of Figures 2 and 3 shows that the 2.75cm DRL curve is not the best fit of the data. The Excel exponential curve is the better fit of the data.
The original analysis of all the data chose the source depth to be equal to approximately 90% of the cumulative activity. This depth is 5.8cm and based upon the 2.75cm DRL curve. Using the same criteria on the exponential curves in Figures 2 and 3 results in a source depth of 9.5cm with the top 1 inch removed and 12.1 cm with the top 2 inches removed.
The DRL depth is equal to the depth when the maximum activity has been reduced by a factor of 1 /e, equal to 0.368. The DRL value for all the data is 2. 75cm. The calculated DRL value, based upon the exponential curves, is 4.1 Ocm for data with the top inch removed and 5.43cm for the data with the top 2 inches removed.
35
Table 2 presents a summary of the ECP model evaluations.
Table 2 - ECP Model Comparisons Source Dmax Core Data thickness (cm)
(cm) all (from TSD 14-022) 5.8 0
minus top 1" 9.5 0
minus top 2" 12.1 0
DRL (cm) 2.75 4.10 5.43 DOD DJilIJ R rn C D DITJ DD ITJDC Review of the Table 2 data shows that removal of the top inch of concrete increases the source thickness from 5.8cm to 9.5cm. This increase is a factor of 1.6 from the un-remediated thickness. Removal of the top inch of concrete increases the DRL from 2.75cm to 4.1 Ocm. This increase is a factor of 1.5 from the un-remediated length. These evaluations show that any remediation of the Aux Bldg basement floor will result in a change to the ECP model presented in TSD 14-022. The post-remediation conditions need to be evaluated and a revised ECP model created. There is sufficient characterization data, so additional cores are not needed. All data used in these evaluations is presented in Attachment I.
3.2.
Non-uniform Surfaces Prior to performing the Final Status Survey of a concrete basement floor, remediation may need to be performed. This remediation could include hot spot removal or reduction, removal of a drain line or removal of a surface layer. These remediations may create a non-uniform surface. This evaluation assumes that hot spot remediation and drain pipe removal will result in a gouge or hole or trench of up to I foot in depth. The area of these remediations will also be assumed to be small when compared to the 28.3 m2 Field of View (FOY) for each measurement; however, that is not a condition for the evaluations. The purpose of these evaluations is to examine the effect of placing the detector at a distance of 3 meters minus I foot (2.6952 meters) from the average level of the surface to compensate for the non-uniformity, hole or trench but using the 3-meter distance efficiencies to analyze the spectrums. In this geometry, most of the surface being measured will be closer to the detector than the hole or trench.
The parameters from Zion !SOCS detector SIN 5456 was used to perform the evaluations. Two geometries were created for each evaluation; a detector to surface distance of3 meters and a distance of 3 meters minus I foot. These geometries were created for a 2.54cm contamination layer and I.27cm contamination layer with a CP geometry and for the three ECP geometries described in Section 3.1.
The efficiencies for the Cs-137 and Co-60 gamma energies were recorded for both distances in each geometry and compared. The Geometry Composer reports for the CP geometries and gamma efficiencies are presented in Attachment 2. The Geometry
DOD CTIJIIlJ ROJ [
DOJDOJOJD[
Composer reports for the ECP geometries and gamma efficiencies are presented in.
Table 3 presents a comparison of the 2.54cm CP geometry efficiencies.
Table 3 - 2.54cm CP Model Efficiency Comparison Energy 3m 3m-lft Ratio results results 3m-lft/
(KeV)
(c/y)
(c/y) 3m 66 1.65 2.85 E-06
- 3. lOE-06 1.09 1173.22 2.24E-06 2.43 E-06 1.08 1332.49 2.12E-06 2.30E-06 1.08 Table 4 presents a comparison of the I.27cm CP geometry efficiencies.
Table 4 - 1.27cm CP Model Efficiency Comparison Energy 3m 3m-lft Ratio results results 3m-lft/
(KeV)
(c/y)
(c/y) 3m 661.65 3.25E-06 3.53E-06 1.09 11 73.22 2.47E-06 2.68E-06 1.09 1332.49 2.32E-06 2.53E-06 1.09 Table 5 presents a comparison of the 3 meter ECP geometry efficiencies.
Table 5 - 3 Meter ECP Model Efficiency Comparison Energy All Data w/o top 1" w/o top Ratio Ratio all/minus all/minus (KeV)
(c/y)
(c/y) 2" (c/y) top 1" top 2" 66 1.65 2.50E-06 2.09E-06 1.84E-06 1.20 1.36 11 73.22 2.02E-06 1.74E-06 1.57E-06
- 1. 16 1.29 1332.49 l.92E-06 1.67E-06 1.5 1 E-06 1.1 5 1.28 Table 6 presents a comparison of the 3 meter minus I foot ECP geometry efficiencies.
Table 6 - 3 Meter Minus 1 Foot ECP Model Efficiency Comparison Energy All Data w/o top 1" w/o top Ratio Ratio all/minus all/minus (KeV)
(c/y)
(c/y) 2" (c/y) top 1" top 2" 66 1.65 2.70E-06 2.27E-06 2.0 1 E-06
- 1. 19 1.34 1173.22 2.1 7E-06 l.88E-06 1.70E-06 1.15 1.28 1332.49 2.07E-06 1.8 1 E-06 1.63E-06 1.14 1.26
DOD IIIIIIIJ R DD [
DODD DD ODD[
Table 7 presents a comparison of the 3 meter and 3 meter minus I foot distance ECP geometry efficiencies.
Table 7 - Two Distances ECP Model Efficiency Comparison Energy All Data W/OTop W/O Top Ratio 1" Ratio 2" Ratio (KeV) 3m-1I3m 3m-1 I 3m 3m-1I3m 661.65 1.08 1.09 1.09 1173.22 1.07 1.08 1.08 1332.49 1.07 1.08 1.08 Review of the data in Tables 3, 4 and 7 show that using the 3 meter efficiencies with the detector at 3 meters minus I foot distance, wi ll produce an approximately 7% to 9%
conservative values for Cs-1 37 and Co-60.
Review of the data in Table 5 show that the Cs-13 7 and Co-60 gamma efficiencies range from 15% to 20% higher for the ECP model with all the data than the corresponding val ues for the top I inch removed. This is a significant change in the efficiency.
Review of the data in Table 6 show that the Cs-137 and Co-60 gamma efficiencies range from 14% to 19% higher for the ECP model with all the data than the corresponding values for the top I inch removed.
- 4.
CONCLUSIONS I.
Any remediation of a concrete surface after analysis of the concrete core data has been completed wi ll require re-evaluation of the I SOCS geometry model and data and/or collection of additional core data.
- 2.
For non-uniform surfaces with gouges, pits or trenches up to I foot in depth can be conservatively evaluated by placing the detector at a distance of 3 meters minus I foot (2.7 meters) and using the 3 meter effici encies. Distances deeper than I foot should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
- 5.
REFERENCES I. Zion Reactor License Termination Plan Revision I.
- 2. Zion TSO 14-022, "Use of In-Situ Gamma Spectroscopy for Source Term Survey of End State Structures", Revision 0.
- 6.
ATTACHMENTS Attachment I --'- Exponential Circular Plane Data - Non-uniform Surface Efficiencies with CP Model - Non-uniform Surface Efficiencies with the ECP Model Exponential Circular Plane Data ODD ITilIIlJ ROD [
000000000[
All Samples Depth cm Average
% of total cumulative Exp fit Source Term data (Ci) 0.635 2.47E-01 45.96%
45.96%
2.04E-01 1.905 l.14E-01 21.21%
67.17%
1.38E-01 3.175 5.05E-02 9.40%
76.56%
9.41E-02 4.445 2.85E-02 5.30%
81.86%
6.40E-02 5.715 2.30E-02 4.28%
86.14%
4.35E-02 6.985 l.65E-02 3.07%
89.21%
2.95E-02 8.255 l.14E-02 2.12%
91.33%
2.0lE-02 9.525 l.25E-02 2.33%
93.66%
l.37E-02 10.795 4.86E-03 0.90%
94.56%
9.28E-03 12.065 8.85E-03 1.65%
96.21%
6.31E-03 13.335 4.llE-03 0.76%
96.98%
4.29E-03 14.605 3.26E-03 0.61%
97.58%
2.91E-03 15.875 2.60E-03 0.48%
98.07%
l.98E-03 17.145 2.09E-03 0.39%
98.45%
l.35E-03 18.415 l.68E-03 0.31%
9.15E-04 19.685 l.35E-03 0.25%
6.22E-04 20.955 l.09E-03 0.20%
4.23E-04 22.225 8.82E-04 0.16%
2.87E-04 23.495 7.15E-04 0.13%
l.95E-04 24.765 5.74E-04 0.11%
1.33E-04 26.035 4.65E-04 0.09%
9.02E-05 27.305.
3.77E-04 0.07%
6.13E-05 28.575 3.06E-04 0.06%
4.17E-05 29.845 2.50E-04 0.05%
2.83E-05 31.115 2.03E-04 0.04%
l.93E-05 32.385 l.65E-04 0.03%
1.31E-05 33.655 l.36E-04 0.03%
8.90E-06 34.925 l.llE-04 0.02%
6.05E-06 5.37E-01 100.00%
6.36E-01
% of total I cumulative 2.75cm DRL data 32.03%
32.03%
l.96E-01 21.77%
53.80%
l.24E-01 14.80%
68.60%
7.79E-02 10.06%
78.66%
4.91E-02 6.84% I 85.49%
3.09E-02 4.65%
90.14%
l.95E-02 3.16%
93.30%
l.23E-02 2.15%
95.45%
7.73E-03 1.46% I 96.90%
4.87E-03 0.99%
97.90%
3.07E-03 0.67%
98.57%
1.94E-03 0.46%
I 99.03%
l.22E-03 0.31%
99.34%
7.68E-04 0.21%
99.55%
4.84E-04 0.14% I 3.05E-04 0.10% I l.92E-04 0.07%
l.21E-04 0.05%
7,63E-05 0.03%
4.81E-05 0.02%
3.03E-05 0.01%
l.91E-05 0.01%
l.20E-05 0.01%
7.59E-06 0.00%
4.78E-06 0.00%
3.0lE-06 0.00%
1.90E-06 0.00%
l.20E-06 0.00%
7.54E-07 100.00%
5.30E-01 DOD ITilDOJ RCD [
ornooornoc
%of 1 cumulative total 36.99%
36.99%
23.31%
60.29%
14.69% I 74.98%
9.25%
84.23%
5.83%
90.07%
3.67%
93.74%
2.32%
96.06%
1.46%
97.51%
0.92%
98.43%
0.58%
99.01%
0.37%
99.38%
0.23%
99.61%
0.14%
99.75%
0.09%
99.84%
0.06% I 0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
100.00%
Samples w/o top 1" cumulative Exp fit Depth cm Average
% of total data Source Term (Ci) 0.635 5.0SE-02 28.59%
28.59%
4.33E-02 1.905 2.85E-02 16.14%
44.73%
3.17E-02 3.175 2.30E-02 13.02%
57.75%
2.33E-02 4.445 1.65E-02 9.34%
67.09%
- 1. 71E-02 5.715 1.14E-02 6.45%
73.54%
l.25E-02 6.985 1.25E-02 7.08%
80.62%
9.19E-03 8.255 4.86E-03 2.75%
83.37%
6.74E-03 9.525 8.85E-03 5.01% I 88.38%
4.94E-03 10.795 4.llE-03 2.33%
I 90.71%
3.63E-03 12.065 3.26E-03 1.85%
92.55%
2.66E-03 13.335 2.60E-03 1.47%
94.03%
l.95E-03 14.605 2.09E-03 1.18%
95.21%
l.43E-03 15.875 1.68E-03 0.95%
96.16%
l.05E-03 17.145 1.35E-03 0.76%
96.92%
7.70E-04
~
18.415 l.09E-03 0.62%
5.65E-04 19.685 8.82E-04 0.50%
4.14E-04 20.955 7.lSE-04 0.40%
3.04E-04 22.225 S.74E-04 0.32%
2.23E-04 23.495 4.65E-04 0.26%
l.64E-04
+
24.765 3.77E-04 0.21%
l.20E-04 26.035 3.06E-04 0.17%
8.80E-05 27.305 2.SOE-04 0.14%
6.45E-05 28.575 2.03E-04 0.11%
4.73E-05 29.845 1.6SE-04 0.09%
3.47E-05 31.115 1.36E-04 0.08%
2.55E-05 32.385 1.llE-04 0.06%
l.87E-05 33.655 8.71E-05 0.05%
l.37E-05 34.925 7.08E-05 0.04%
l.OlE-05 1.77E-01 100.00%
1.62E-01 cumulative
% of total 26.65%
26.65%
19.55%
46.20%
14.34%
60.54%
10.52%
71.06%
7.72%
78.78%
5.66%
84.44%
4.15%
88.59%
3.05%
91.63%
2.23%
93.87%
1.64%
95.51%
1.20%
96.71%
0.88%
97.59%
0.65%
98.24%
0.47%
98.71%
0.35%
0.26%
0.19%
0.14%
0.10%
0.07%
0.05%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
100.00%
2.75cm DRL data 4.0lE-02 2.53E-02 l.59E-02 l.OOE-02 6.32E-03 3.98E-03 2.51E-03 l.58E-03 DOD ITillDD R DD [
DDDDDDDDD[
%of cumulative total 36.99%
36.99%
23.31%
60.29%
14.69%
74.98%
9.25%
84.23%
5.83%
90.07%
3.67%
93.74%
2.32%
96.06%
1.46%
97.51%
9.97E-04 t 0.92%
98.43%
6.28E-04 0.58%
99.01%
3.96E-04 0.37%
99.38%
2.49E-04 0.23%
99.61%
l.57E-04 0.14%
99.75%
9.90E-05 0.09%
99.84%
6.24E-05 I 0.06%
3.93E-05 0.04%
2.48E-05 0.02%
l.56E-05 0.01%
9.84E-06 0.01%
6.20E-06 0.01%
3.91E-06 0.00%
2.46E-06 I 0.00%
l.55E-06 0.00%
9.77E-07 0.00%
6.16E-07 0.00%
3.88E-07 0.00%
2.45E-07 0.00%
l.54E-07 0.00%
1.0SE-01 100.00%
Samples w/o top 2"
%of cumulative Exp fit Depth cm Average total data Source Term
{Ci) 0.635 2.30E-02 23.56%
23.56%
2.05E-02 1.905 l.6SE-02 16.90%
40.46%
l.62E-02 3.175 l.14E-02 11.68%
52.13%
l.28E-02 4.445 l.2SE-02 12.80%
64.94%
l.02E-02 5.715 4.86E-03 4.98%
69.92%
8.04E-03 6.985 8.85E-03 9.06%
78.98%
6.36E-03 8.255 4.llE-03 4.21%
83.19%
5.04E-03 9.525 3.26E-03 3.34%
86.53%
3.99E-03 10.795 2.60E-03 2.66%
89.19%
3.16E-03 12.065 2.09E-03 2.14%
91.33%
2.50E-03 13.335 l.68E-03 1.72%
93.05%
l.98E-03 14.605 l.3SE-03 1.38%
94.44%
l.57E-03 15.875 l.09E-03 1.12%
95.55%
1.24E-03 17.145 8.82E-04 0.90%
96.46%
9.81E-04 18.415 7.lSE-04 0.73%
97.19%
I 7.77E-04 19.685 5.74E-04 0.59%
97.78%
6.15E-04 20.955 4.6SE-04 0.48%
98.25%
4.87E-04 22.225 3.77E-04 0.39%
3.85E-04 23.495 3.06E-04 0.31%
3.05E-04 24.765 2.SOE-04 0.26%
2.41E-04 26.035 2.03E-04 0.21%
l.91E-04 27.305 l.6SE-04 0.17%
l.51E-04 28.575 l.36E-04 0.14%
l.20E-04 29.845 l.llE-04 0.11%
9.48E-05 31.115 8.71E-OS 0.09%
7.50E-05 32.385 7.08E-OS 0.07%
5.94E-05 9.76E-02 100.00%
9.SOE-02
%of cumulative 2.75cm total DRL data 20.89%
20.89%
l.83E-02 16.53%
37.42%
l.15E-02 13.09%
50.51%
7.25E-03 10.36%
60.87%
4.57E-03 8.20%
69.07%
2.88E-03 6.49%
75.57%
l.81E-03 5.14%
80.71%
l.14E-03 4.07%
84.77%
7.20E-04 3.22%
87.99%
4.54E-04 2.55% I 90.54%
2.86E-04 2.02%
92.56%
l.80E-04 1.60%
94.16%
l.14E-04 1.26%
95.43%
7.16E-05 1.00% I 96.43%
4.51E-05 0.79%
97.22%
2.84E-05 0.63%
97.85%
l.79E-05 0.50%
98.34%
l.13E-05 7.llE-06 4.48E-06 2.82E-06 I
l.78E-06 l.12E-06 7.06E-07 4.45E-07 2.80E-07 I
l.77E-07 4.94E-02 ODD [DJIIIJ ROD [
000000000[
%of cumulative total 36.99%
36.99%
23.31%
60.29%
14.69%
74.98%
9.25%
84.23%
5.83%
90.07%
3.67%
93.74%
2.32%
96.06%
1.46%
97.51%
0.92%
98.43%
0.58%
99.01%
0.37%
99.38%
0.23%
99.61%
0.14%
99.75%
0.09%
99.84%
0.06%
99.90%
0.04%
99.94%
0.02%
99.96%
DOD ITIJIIIJ R DD [
DODD DD DOD[ Non-uniform Surface Efficiencies with CP Model
OD~ RDDC Geometry Composer Report CJJmfEl~A Date:
==
Description:==
Comment:
File Name:
Software:
Template:
Detector:
Collimator:
Environment:
Integration:
No.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11 12 13 Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 09:28:12 Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete 1 layer equal to 2.54 cm depth C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\In-Situ\\CIRCULAR_PLANE\\Zion 2.54cm concrete.geo I SOCS CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) 5456 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation [large hole collimator])
Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%
Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)
Dimensions (cm)
Delatptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.5 d.I Matierllll Denllty Side Walls 0
600 none Layer 1 2.54 concrete 2.3 Layer 2 0
<none>
Layer 3 0
<none>
Layer 4 0
<none>
Layer 5 0
<none>
Layer 6 0
< none>
Layer 7 0
<none>
Layer 8 0
<none>
Layer 9 0
< none>
Layer 10 0
<none>
Absorberl Absorber2 14 Source-Detector 300 0
0 0
0 59.5 1332.5 88.0 1836.0 I r. ~*~ 1 11.:.R P I Al*I ~
List of energies for efficiency curve generation 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 898.0 1173.2
-4r/ /
[(
Page 1 of 2 Rel.Cone.
1.00
Geometry Composer Report Date:
==
Description:==
Comment:
File Name:
Software:
Template:
Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 09:28:12 Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete 1 layer equal to 2.54 cm depth C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\In-Situ\\CIRCULAR_PLANE\\Zion 2.54cm concrete.geo I SOCS CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)
Page 2 of 2
DD~ RDDC Geometry Composer Report CJ.tfNffj~A Date:
==
Description:==
Comment:
File Name:
Software:
Template:
Detector:
Collimator:
Environment:
Integration:
No.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11 12 13 Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 09:19:13 Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete = 3m -1 foot 1 layer equal to 2.54 cm depth C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\ln-Situ\\CIRCULAR_PLANE\\Zion 2.54cm concrete-1 foot.gee I SOCS CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) 5456 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation [large hole collimator])
Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%
Convergence= 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)
Dimensions (cm) n.atptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.5 d.I Malllrlal Side Walls 0
600 none Layer 1 2.54 concrete Layer 2 0
<none>
Layer 3 0
<none>
Layer 4 0
<none>
Layer 5 0
<none>
Layer 6 0
<none>
Layer 7 0
<none>
Layer 8 0
<none>
Layer 9 0
<none>
Layer 10 0
<none>
Absorber!
Absorber2 Denllty 2.3 14 Source-Detector 269.52 0
0 0
0 59.5 1332.5 88.0 1836.0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 Page 1of2 898.0 1173.2 Rel.Cone.
1.00
DD~ RDDC Geometry Composer Report CJ~rei~A Date:
==
Description:==
Comment:
File Name:
Software:
Template:
v z. **. '* )(
Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 09:19:13 Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete = 3m -1 foot 1 layer equal to 2.54 cm depth C: \\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\In-Situ\\CIRCULAR_PLANE\\Zion 2.54cm concrete-1 foot.gee I SOCS CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)
Page 2 of 2
RESULTS ISOCS/LabSOCS File :
ISOCS/LABSOCS DOD ornmo ROD [
C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\In-Situ\\CIRCULAR ~'t\\lftlSn ISOCS /LabSOCS Time:
03/14/17 09 : 28 : 04 Template :
CIRCULAR PLANE Geom
Description:
Zion 2. 54cm Comment :
Zion 2. 54cm Detector:
5456 Collimator :
50MM-90D NEW Convergence :
1. 00 %
Area [Sq Meters]:
2. 8274e+001 (C)
Mass [Grams]:
l. 6877e+006 (C)
Length [Meters] :
not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U ) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency
%Uncertainty 59. 54 3.7 5877e- 006 10. 0 88.0 3 5. 08373e-006 10.0 122. 06 5. 27 170e- 006 10. 0 165. 85 5. 07193e-006 8. 0 391. 69 3. 57881e- 006 8. 0 661.65 2. 84879e-006 6. 0 898. 02 2. 51718e-006 6.0 1173. 22 2. 23913e-006 4. 0 1332. 49 2. 12014e- 006 4. 0 1836. 01 l. 78650e- 006 4. 0
%Convergence Final
-0. 426258
- 0. 473965
- 0. 540782
- 0. 578253
-0.521853
-0.502048
-0. 470993
- 0. 442835
-0.420991
- 0.386185
- of Voxels 1628 1628 1628 1628 1628 1628 1628 1628 1628 1628 2. :
ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ODO DOJIIIJ R DD C ISOCS/LabSOCS File:
C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\In-Situ\\CIRCULAR ~~~+.Jl.~L.0.-~ '
ISOCS/LabSOCS Time:
03/14/17 09:19 : 08 Template:
CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description :
Zion 2. 54cm-lft Comment:
Zion 2.54cm-lft Detector:
5456 Collimator :
50MM-90D NEW Convergence :
1. 00 %
Area [Sq Meters]:
2. 8274e+001 (C )
Mass [Grams] :
1. 6877e+006 (C)
Length [Meters] :
not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U)
= Value modified by user Energy Efficiency
%Uncertainty 59. 54 4.18018e-006 10. 0 88.03 5.66138e-006 10.0 122. 06 5.8764le-006 10.0 165. 85 5.62460e-006 8. 0 391.69 3. 91979e-006 8.0 661.65 3.10172e-006 6.0 898. 02 2.73366e-006 6.0 1173.22 2.42873e-006 4.0 1332.49 2.29857e-006 4.0 1836. 01 l.93545e-006 4.0
%Convergence Final # of Voxels
-0. 223797 17556
-0. 182341 17556
-0.181125 17556
-0. 187260 17556
-0. 225971 17556
-0. 247587 17556
-0. 255239 17556
-0.259371 17556
- 0.258321 17556
-0.259668 17556 2. :
Geometry Composer Report Date:
==
Description:==
Comment:
File Name:
Software:
Template:
Detector:
Collimator:
Environment:
Integration:
Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 09:13:12 Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete 1 layer equal to 1.27 cm depth C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\ln-Situ\\CIRCULAR_PLANE\\Zion l.27cm concrete.geo I SOCS CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) 5456 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation [large hole collimator])
Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%
Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)
Dimensions (cm)
No.
Dela'lptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.S d.I
~*
DM8lty 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11 12 13 14 59.5 1332.5 Side Walls Layer 1 Layer 2 Layer 3 Layer 4 Layer 5 Layer 6 Layer 7 Layer 8 Layer 9 Layer 10 Absorberl Absorber2 Source-Detector 88.0 1836.0 I (.
~*"".I JI :.R Pl AIF 0
600 none 1.27 concrete 2.3 0
<none>
0
<none>
0
<none>
0
<none>
0
<none>
0
<none>
0
<none>
0
<none>
0
<none>
300 0
0 0
0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 898.0 1173.2
.~
Page 1of2 Rel.Cone:.
1.00
oor:Arm Rooc Geometry Composer Report CJ~lfj~A Date:
==
Description:==
Comment:
File Name:
Software:
Template:
y z *..... >:
Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 09:13:12 Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete 1 layer equal to 1.27 cm depth C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\In-Situ\\CIRCULAR_PLANE\\Zion l.27cm concrete.geo I SOCS CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)
Page 2 of 2
Geometry Composer Report Date:
==
Description:==
Comment:
File Name:
Software:
Template:
Detector:
Collimator:
Environment:
Integration:
No.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11 12 13 Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 09:10:45 Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete = 3m - 1 foot 1 layer equal to 1.27 cm depth C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\In-Situ\\CIRCULAR_PLANE\\Zion 1.27cm concrete-1 foot.geo
!SOCS CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version : (default) 5456 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation [large hole collimator])
Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%
Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)
Dimensions (cm)
Delatptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.S d.I Mlltlertal Side Walls 0
600 none Layer 1 1.27 concrete Layer 2
- 0
<none>
Layer 3 0
<none>
Layer 4 0
<none>
Layer 5 0
<none>
Layer 6 0
<none>
Layer 7 0
<none>
Layer 8 0
<none>
Layer 9 0
<none>
Layer 10 0
<none>
Absorberl Absorber2 Denllty 2.3 14 Source-Detector 269.52 0
0 0
0 59.5 1332.5 88.0 1836.0 I (.
~ *~ I JI ~ Pl AIF List of energies for efficiency curve generation 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7
-4,r? --
cr Page 1of 2
.>i ~t l'?n
.::-:> n '* "r*."~r 898.0 1173.2 bl.Cone.
1.00
Geometry Composer Report Date:
==
Description:==
Comment:
File Name:
Software:
Template:
y Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 09: 10:45 Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete = 3m - 1 foot 1 layer equal to 1.27 cm depth C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\In-Situ\\CIRCULAR_PLANE\\Zion 1.27cm concrete-1 foot.geo I SOCS CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)
- z. **. *. x Page 2 of 2
ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ODD ITilillJ R rn [
ISOCS/LabSOCS File :
C: \\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\In-Situ\\CIRCULAR ~
~on ISOCS/LabSOCS Time:
03/14/17 09 : 13 : 07 Template :
CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description :
Zion l.27cm Comment :
Zion l. 27cm Detector :
5456 Collimator :
50MM-90D NEW Convergence:
1.00 %
Area [Sq Meters] :
2. 8274e+001 (C)
Mass [Grams] :
8.4385e+005 (C)
Length [Meters] :
not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency
%Uncertainty 59.54 5. 64561e-006 r
10. 0 88. 03 6. 77731e- 006 10. 0 122. 06 6. 71355e-006 10. 0 165. 85 6. 25215e-006 8. 0 391. 69 4.20224e-006 8.0 661. 65 3. 25166e-006 6.0 898.02 2. 80927e-006 6. 0 1173. 22 2. 46740e-006 4. 0 1332.49 2.32324e-006 4. 0 1836. 01 l. 93213e-006 4.0
%Convergence Final # of Voxels 0.498601 1618 0.463116 1618 0.472362 1618
-0. 674072 814
-0. 116124 406 0. 157028 406
-0. 697293 814
-0. 684715 814
-0.666609 814
-0. 639529 814
- 1. L
ISOCS/LabSOCS File:
ISOCS/LabSOCS Time:
ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS DOD OOilJO R DD [
C: \\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\In-Situ\\CIRCULAR Jl1 N2 zq_=i5n 03/14/17 09 : 10:40 Template :
CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Descripti on :
Zion l. 27cm-lft Comment :
Zion l. 27cm-lft Detector :
5456 Collimator :
50MM-90D NEW Convergence :
1. 00 %
Area [Sq Meters] :
2. 8274e+001 (C ) /
Mass [Grams]:
8. 4385e+005 (C)
Length [Meters] :
not used (C)
= Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency
%Uncertainty 59. 54 6. 31442e-006 10. 0 88.0 3 7. 57837e-006 10.0 122. 06 7.4 9551e-006 10.0 165. 85 6.977 96e- 006 8. 0 391. 69 4. 59768e-006 8. 0 661. 65 3. 53048e-006 6. 0 898. 02 3.061 63e-0 06 6.0 1173. 22 2. 6844le-006 4.0 1332.4 9 2.52581e- 006 4. 0 1836. 01 2. 09812e -006 4. 0
%Convergence Final # of Voxels
-0. 2496 49 87 78
-0. 253382 8778
-0.254293 8778
- 0. 258073 8778
-0.284344 8778
-0. 301798 8778
-0.307864 8778
-0. 311473 8778
- 0.309709 8778
- 0.311376 8778
- 1. L
ODD ITilIIJ R DD [
DODD DO DOD[ Non-uniform Surface Efficiencies with ECP Model
oorAru Rooc Geometry Composer Report C1~1§ f!ifRA Date:
==
Description:==
Comment:
File Name:
Software:
Template:
Detector:
Collimator:
Environment:
Integration:
No.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 13:09:31 ECP model defined in TSD 14-022 C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\ln-Situ\\EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE\\Zion all concrete data.geo I SOCS EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) 5456 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation [large hole collimator])
Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%
Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)
Dimensions (cm)
Dwriptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 cL4 d.5 d.I Metlerllll Side Walls 0
600 none Layer 1 0
none Layer 2 0
none Layer 3 0
none Source Layer 5.8 0
2.75 concrete Absorber!
0.3 hpolyeth Absorber2 Denllty...a.cane.
2.3 1.00 0.95 8
Source-Detector 300 0
0 0
0 59.5 1332.5 88.0 1836.0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 898.0
!EXPONENTIAL CIRCULAR PLANE I c
.Q 1--- !bln:.to \\Apr l?*i cir.* (5..1) -----<
11.0-
~ 0.5-Depth
Tl
--~""'"
l'hr*
I I
( ~---r----;
j>/
.,._.~m--~--0-+_0_+ --
Page 1of2 0
0 COnMrlt'"cn 1173.2
Geometry Composer Report Date:
==
Description:==
Comment:
File Name:
Software:
Template:
z*
y Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 13:09:31 ECP model defined in TSD 14-022 C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\In-Situ\\EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE\\Zion all concrete data.geo I SOCS EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version : (default)
Page 2 of 2
oorlJ.m Rmc Geometry Composer Report CJ~~~A Date:
==
Description:==
Comment:
File Name:
Software:
Template:
Detector:
Collimator:
Environment:
Integration:
No.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 13:12:31 ECP model without top inch data exponetial curve fit of data without top 2 layers C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\ln-Situ\\EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_P... \\Zion concrete data minus lin.geo I SOCS EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) 5456 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation [large hole collimator])
Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%
Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)
Dimensions (cm)
Delatptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.S d.I Side Walls 0
600 none Layer 1 0
none Layer 2 0
none Layer 3 0
none Source Layer 9.5 0
4.1 concrete Absorberl 0.3 hpolyeth Absorber2 o.n.lty bl.Cone.
2.3 1.00 0.95 8
Source-Detector 300 0
0 0
0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 1332.5 88.0 1836.0 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 I
EXPONENTIAL CIRCULAR PLANE I Page 1of2 y t,,. x k:.:." __ z 5.5 j___
A 898.0 1173.2
- 1
DD~ RDDC Geometry Composer Report CJJmlf§~A Date:
==
Description:==
Comment:
File Name:
Software:
Template:
y Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 13:12:31 ECP model without top inch data exponetial curve fit of data without top 2 layers C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\ln-Situ\\EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE\\Zion concrete data minus lin.gec I SOCS EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)
- z. **. '* }(
Page 2 of 2
Geometry Composer Report Date:
==
Description:==
Comment:
Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 13:14:34 ECP model without top two inches data exponetial curve fit of data without top 4 layers File Name:
Software:
C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\In-Situ\\EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_P... \\Zion concrete data minus 2in.geo I SOCS Template:
Detector:
Collimator:
Environment:
Integration:
No.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) 5456 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation [large hole collimator])
Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%
Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)
Dimensions (cm)
Deealptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 d.4 d.5 d.I Mnmtlil Side Walls 0
600 none Layer 1 0
none Layer 2 0
none Layer 3 0
none Source Layer 12.1 0
5.43 concrete Absorber!
0.3 hpolyeth Absorber2 8
Source-Detector 300 0
0 0
0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 1332.5 88.0 1836.0 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 I EXPONENTIAL CIRCULAR PLANE I Page 1of2 y
x l.e.:_' __ z J__
A 898.0 Demlty Rel. Cone.
2.3 1.00 0.95 1173.2
OD~ RDDC Geometry Composer Report CJ~~~A Date:
==
Description:==
Comment:
File Name:
Software:
Template:
y Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 13:14:34 ECP model without top two inches data exponetial curve fit of data without top 4 layers C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\ln-Situ\\EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE\\Zion concrete data minus 2in.gec I SOCS EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)
- z...... )(
Page 2 of 2
ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS DOD ITIJIIlJ R rn C ISOCS/LabSOCS File :
D []JO [)) []JO[
C: \\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\In-Situ\\EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE ISOCS/LabSOCS Time :
03/14/17 13:09:27 Template:
EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description :
ECP - all Comment:
ECP - all Detector :
5456 Collimator :
50MM-90D NEW Convergence :
1.00 %
Area [Sq Meters] :
2. 8274e+001 (C)
Mass [Grams] :
3.8538e+006 (C)
Length [Meters] :
not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by use r Energy Efficiency
%Uncertainty 59.54 2.9702le-006 10. 0 88. 03 4.05452e-006 10.0 122.06 4. 27633e-006 10.0 165. 85 4. 17178e-006 8. 0 391. 69 3. 06932e-006 8.0 661.65 2. 50292e-006 6. 0 898. 02 2.2425le- 006 6. 0 1173. 22 2. 01893e-006
- 4. 0 1332. 49 l. 92199e-006 4.0 1836. 01 l. 6410le-006 4. 0
%Convergence Final # of Voxels
-0.069336 3256
-0. 172904 3256
-0. 285085 3256
- 0. 316471 3256
- 0. 072996 1624
- 0. 110487 1624
-0. 094005 1624
- 0.129291 1624
- 0. 121196 1624
-0. 122452 1624
ISOCS/LABSOCS RES~LTS DOD DDDDDO RDDC ISOCS/LabSOCS File :
ODDO DD DDOC C: \\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\In-Situ\\EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE ISOCS/LabSOCS Time:
03/14/17 13:12:27 Template :
EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE Geom
Description:
ECP -
1 inch Comment:
ECP -
1 inch Detector :
5456 Collimator :
50MM-90D NEW Convergence:
1.0 0 %
Area [Sq Meters]:
2. 8274e+001 (C)
Mass [Grams]:
6.3123e+006 (C)
Length [MetersJ :
not used (C)
= Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency
%Uncertainty 59. 54 2. 11252e- 006 10. 0 88. 03 3.02610e-006 10.0 122. 06 3.27 820e-006 10. 0 165. 85 3.2 5344e-006 8. 0 391. 69 2. 49367e-006 8. 0 661. 65 2. 09236e-006 6. 0 898. 02 l. 90647e-006 6. 0 1173. 22
- 1. 74165e- 006 4.0 1332. 49 l.66929e-006 4. 0 1836. 01 1. 44868e-006 4. 0
%Convergence Final # of Voxels
-0.392368 4070
-0.1 99891 4070
- 0. 160452 4070
-0. 168155 4070
-0.177398 4070
- 0.225467 4070
-0. 224983 4070
-0. 223042 4070
-0.212203 4070
-0. 194054 4070
ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS DOD DOillJ R OJ [
ISOCS/LabSOCS File:
DODD DD DOD[
C: \\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\In-Situ\\EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE ISOCS/LabSOCS Time:
03/14/17 13 : 14 : 28 Template :
EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description :
ECP -
2 inches ECP -
2 inches 5456 Comment:
Detector :
Collimator :
50MM-90D NEW Convergence :
1. 00 %
Area [Sq Meters] :
2. 8274e+001 (C)
Mass [Grams]:
8.0398e+006 (C)
Length [Meters] :
not used
{C)
= Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency
%Uncertainty 59. 54
- 1. 70981e-006 10.0 88.03 2. 51042e- 006 10. 0 122. 06 2. 75518e- 006 10. 0 165. 85 2. 75980e-006 8. 0 391. 69 2. 15955e-006 8.0 661. 65 l. 84187e-006 6. 0 898. 02 l. 69650e-006 6. 0 1173. 22 1.56509e-006 4.0 1332. 49 1. 50695e-006 4.0 1836. 01 l.32264e- 006 4. 0
%Convergence Final # of Voxels
-0. 140384 9708
-0.098247 9708
-0. 512290 4884
- 0. 515849 4884
-0. 620355 488 4
-0. 6121 21 4884
-0.568575 4884
- 0.530638 48 84
-0.50494 3 4884
-0.456810 4884
Geometry Composer Report oorAru Rooc CJ~fi§~A Date:
==
Description:==
Comment:
File Name:
Software:
Template:
Detector:
Collimator:
Environment:
Integration:
No.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 Thursday, March 16, 2017 - 08:04:15 ECP model defined in TSO 14-022 3 meters minus 1 foot C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\In-Situ\\EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE\\Zion all concrete data-lft.geo I SOCS EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) 5456 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation [large hole collimator])
Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%
Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)
Dimensions (cm) o.atptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.5 d.I Mnerlal Side Walls 0
600 none Layer 1 0
none Layer 2 0
none Layer 3 0
none Source Layer 5.8 0
2.75 concrete Absorber!
0.3 hpolyeth Absorber2 uenlllY 'K91.Conc:.
2.3 1.00 0.95 8
Source-Detector 269.52 0
0 0
0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 1332.5 88.0 1836.0 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 I
EXPONENTIAL Cl RCU LAR PLANE I Deptl'I Page 1 of 2 898.0 1173.2
DD~ RDDC Geometry Composer Report CJ~~~A Date:
==
Description:==
Comment:
File Name:
Software:
Template:
Thursday, March 16, 2017 - 08:04:15 ECP model defined in TSD 14-022 3 meters minus 1 foot C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\ln-Situ\\EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE\\Zion all concrete data-lft.geo I SOCS EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) 4 Page 2 of 2
~
DD~ RDDC Geometry Composer Report CJ~fel~A Date:
==
Description:==
Comment:
File Name:
Software:
Template:
Detector:
Collimator:
Environment:
Integration:
No.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 Thursday, March 16, 2017 - 08:08:21 ECP model without top inch data (3 meters-1 foot distance) exponetial curve fit of data without top 2 layers C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\ln-Situ\\EXPONENT _CIRCULA... \\Zion ECP data minus lin and lft.geo I SOCS EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version : (default) 5456 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation [large hole collimator])
Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%
Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)
Dimensions (cm)
Dwriplion d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.5 d.I MneNI Side Walls 0
600 none Layer 1 0
none Layer 2 0
none Layer 3 0
none Source Layer 9.5 0
4.1 concrete Absorber!
0.3 hpolyeth Absorber2 Denllty Rel. Cone.
2.3 1.00 0.95 8
Source-Detector 269.52 0
0 0
0 59.5 1332.5 88.0 1836.0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 122. 1 165.9 391.7 661.7 I
EXPONENTIAL CIRCULAR PLANE I f 0.5-Dmcix CJ.2.
(~c: )
or-1 Daptl'I Page 1of2 e e 898.0 1173.2
DD~ RDDC Geometry Composer Report C.BJ<ilfl ~A Date:
==
Description:==
Comment:
File Name:
Software:
Template:
Thursday, March 16, 2017 - 08:08:21 ECP model without top inch data (3 meters-1 foot distance) exponetial curve fit of data without top 2 layers C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\ln-Situ\\EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_... \\Zion ECP data minus lin and lft.geo I SOCS EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)
Page 2 of 2
Geometry Composer Report Date:
==
Description:==
Comment:
File Name:
Software:
Template:
Detector:
Collimator:
Environment:
Integration:
No.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 Thursday, March 16, 2017 - 08:11:39 ECP model without top two inches data (3 meters - 1 foot distance) exponential curve fit of data without top 4 layers C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\ln-Situ\\EXPONENT_CIRCULA... \\Zion ECP data minus 2in and 1 ft.geo I SOCS EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) 5456 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation [large hole collimator])
Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%
Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)
- Dimensions (cm)
Delatptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.S d.I Side Walls 0
600 none Layer 1 0
none Layer 2 0
none Layer 3 0
none Source Layer 12.1 0
5.43 concrete Absorberl 0.3 hpolyeth Absorber2 Dendy Rel.Cone.
2.3 1.00 0.95 8
Source-Detector 269.52 0
0 0
0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 1332.5 88.0 1836.0 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 898.0 I EXPONENTIAL CIRCULAR PLANE I Dm!D: :l.2.
(oc:)
o~I Oeptl'I Page 1of2 y
t x
k.:." __ z a.s
~
A 0
e COn'i'tl'lt'"c n 1173.2
Geometry Composer Report Date:
==
Description:==
Comment:
File Name:
Software:
Template:
Thursday, March 16, 2017 - 08:11:39 ECP model without top two inches data (3 meters - 1 foot distance) exponential curve fit of data without top 4 layers C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\In-Situ\\EXPONENT_CIRCULAR... \\Zion ECP data minus 2in and 1 ft.gee I SOCS EXPONENT _CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)
Page 2 of 2
DOD ITilIIJ R rn C ISOCS/LabSOCS File :
C: \\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\In-Situ\\EXPONENT C1fRC:fR ISOCS/LabSOCS Time :
03/16/17 08 : 04:10 ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS Template :
EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description :
ECP-all-lft Comment :
ECP-all-lft Detector :
5 4 5 6 Collimator :
50MM-90D NEW Convergence :
1.00 %
Area [Sq Meters] :
2. 8274e+001 (C)
Mass [Grams] :
3. 8538e+006 (C)
Length [Meters] :
not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user PLANE Energy Efficiency
%Uncerta i nty
%Convergence Final # of Voxels 59.54 3. 26640e-006 10. 0
-0. 340638 35112 88. 03 4. 46862e-006 10. 0
- 0. 219499 35112 122. 06 4. 71711e- 006 10. 0
- 0. 178969 35112 165. 85 4. 58166e-006 8. 0
- 0. 173263 35112 391. 69 3. 32283e-006 8. 0
- 0. 140550 35112 661. 65 2. 69668e-006 6. 0
- 0. 132562 35112 898. 02 2. 41189e- 006 6. 0
-0. 140077 35112 1173. 22 2. 17001e-006 4. 0
-0. 149687 35112 1332. 49 2. 06556e-006 4. 0
-0. 152607 35112 1836. 01
- 1. 76347e-006 4.0
- 0.161610 351 12
RESULTS ISOCS/LABSOCS ODD ITilIIIJ R DD [
ISOCS/LabSOCS File:
C:\\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data \\GEOMETRY\\In-Situ\\EXPONENT e........._H,Jl,-lrL.1.-'.+ pLANE ISOCS /LabSOCS Time :
03/16/17 08 : 08 : 16 Template:
EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description :
ECP-lin-lft Comment :
ECP-lin-lft Detector :
5456.
Collimator :
50MM-90D NEW Convergence:
1. 00 %
Area [Sq Meters] :
2. 8274e+001 (C)
Mass [Grams] :
6. 3123e+006 (C)
Length [Meters] :
not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U)
= Value modified by user Energy Efficiency
%Uncertainty 59. 54 2. 36918e-006 10.0 88. 03 3. 38274e-00 6 10.0 122. 06 3. 65655e-0 06 10.0 165. 85 3. 61159e- 006 8. 0 391.69 2. 72798e-006 8. 0 661. 65 2. 27302e-0 06 6. 0 898. 02 2. 06570e-006 6.0 1173. 22 1. 88487e-0 06 4. 0 1332. 49 l. 80587e- 006 4. 0 1836. 01 l. 56650e-006 4. 0
%Convergence Final # of Voxels
-0. 109036 43890
- 0. 104530 43890
- 0. 073812 43890
- 0. 078445 43890
- 0. 080835 43890
- 0. 104310 43890
-0. 126119 43890
- 0. 145392 43890
- 0. 152263 43890
-0.166874 43890
ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS DOD ITIIIIIJ R DD C ISOCS/LabSOCS File :
DDDDDDDDDC C: \\GENIE2K\\isocs\\data\\GEOMETRY\\In-Situ\\EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE ISOCS/LabSOCS Time :
03/16/17 08 : 11 : 34 Template :
EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description :
ECP-2in-lft Comment :
ECP-2in-lft Detector :
5456 Collimator :
50MM-90D NEW Convergence :
1. 00 %
Area [Sq Meters] :
2.8274e+001 (C)
Mass [Grams] :
8. 0398e+006 (C)
Length [Meters] :
not used (C)
= Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency
%Uncertainty 59. 54 1. 90780e-006 10. 0 88. 03 2. 79289e- 006 10. 0 122. 06 3. 06133e-006 10. 0 165. 85 3. 05304e-006 8. 0 391. 69 2. 36557e- 006 8. 0 661. 65 2. 00554e-006 6. 0 898. 02 l. 84216e-006 6.0 1173. 22 l. 69698e-006 4. 0 1332. 49 l.63318e-006 4. 0 1836. 01 1.43248e-006 4. 0
%Convergence Final # of Voxels
- 0. 249249 52668
- 0. 203908 52668
- 0. 184079 52668
- 0.163807 52668
-0.140595 52668
-0.170948 52668
-0. 189144 52668
-0. 203167 52668
-0. 207162 52668
- 0. 216558 52668