ML21069A009

From kanterella
Revision as of 17:14, 20 January 2022 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comment (145) of Shawn Mccomb Opposing Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2
ML21069A009
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/03/2021
From: Mccomb S
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Office of Administration
References
86FR7747 00145, NRC-2020-0277
Download: ML21069A009 (1)


Text

3/9/2021 blob:https://www.fdms.gov/75eeadf6-9e37-48de-a842-2c9bb9b728f1 SUNI Review Complete Template=ADM-013 As of: 3/9/21 8:10 AM E-RIDS=ADM-03 Received: March 03, 2021 PUBLIC SUBMISSION ADD: Phyllis Clark, Bill Rogers, Kevin Folk, Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. klt-w23c-2ky6 Stacey Imboden, Mary Neely Comments Due: March 03, 2021 Comment (145) Submission Type: Web Publication Date:2/1/2021 Citation: 86 FR 7747 Docket: NRC-2020-0277 Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Comment On: NRC-2020-0277-0001 Notice of Intent To Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Document: NRC-2020-0277-DRAFT-0150 Comment on FR Doc # 2021-02001 Submitter Information Name: Shawn Mccomb Address:

Kalamazoo, MI, 49006 Email: Singinghorse40@hotmail.com Phone: 2692711375 General Comment I am concerned we are endangering our childrens lives by risking water, land and wildlife contamination due to the history of problematic incidences at the Point Beech Nuclear Reactor in Wisconsin.

Problematic history at this site includes internal contamination due to the 1996 cask incident as well as tritium leaks. There is danger of high water levels eroding this site. There is no proof that this reactor is not embrittled and since the request is to operate this plant long after it was designed to, it only increases the risk. We as a species can not afford to contaminate what is one of the largest sources of surface fresh water on the planet.

Decisions made now will effect generations due to the long term need to safely store nuclear waste. It is a poor decision to continue to create more waste when we have many viable, safe and cost effective options. Please look into decommissioning and safely closing this site so that there are adequate funds in the industry to do so and Wisconsin doesn't get left holding the bag for the cost of a contaminated, unusable site which would not be good for the economy.

blob:https://www.fdms.gov/75eeadf6-9e37-48de-a842-2c9bb9b728f1 1/1