ML21050A127

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comment (20) from Pam Nelson Opposing Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML21050A127
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  
Issue date: 02/18/2021
From: Nelson P
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Office of Administration
References
86FR7747 00020, NRC-2020-0277
Download: ML21050A127 (1)


Text

2/19/2021 blob:https://www.fdms.gov/a2389836-a287-41d8-8902-8b4992c18d25 blob:https://www.fdms.gov/a2389836-a287-41d8-8902-8b4992c18d25 1/1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 2/19/21 8:45 AM Received: February 18, 2021 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. 1k5-9lvb-m225 Comments Due: March 03, 2021 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2020-0277 Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Comment On: NRC-2020-0277-0001 Notice of Intent To Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Document: NRC-2020-0277-DRAFT-0024 Comment on FR Doc # 2021-02001 Submitter Information Name: Pam Nelson General Comment Embrittled containers are a huge problem, besides the fact that storage of more waste is more and more hazardous in the cumulative aspects. I adamantly oppose future use of nuclear power at this site.

Two decades of additional operations at Point Beach, on top of what NRC has already approved, would mean yet another 800 metric tons, or more, of additional high-level radioactive waste that would be generated, for which we still have no safe, sound solution, after 64 years of commercial/civilian nuclear power (and high-level radioactive waste generation) in this country. This additional 800 metric tons of irradiated nuclear fuel would represent a catastrophic risk in and of itself, to public health, safety, security, and the environment, and would be a curse on all future generations. High-level radioactive waste remains hazardous and deadly for more than a million years. 20 years of electricity generation at Point Beach is not worth the more than a million years of hazard associated with the high-level radioactive waste that would be generated. This is especially outrageous, when clean, safe, secure, affordable, and reliable renewables, such as wind and solar, combined with efficiency and storage, can readily displace Point Beach in terms of electricity supply SUNI Review Complete Template=ADM-013 E-RIDS=ADM-03 ADD: Phyllis Clark, Bill Rogers, Mary Neely Comment (20)

Publication Date:2/1/2021 Citation: 86 FR 7747