ML22006A103

Comment (160) E-mail Regarding Point Beach Draft SEIS

ML22006A103
Person / Time
Site:	Point Beach
Issue date:	01/03/2022
From:	Public Commenter Public Commenter
To:	Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
NRC/NMSS
References
86FR62220
Download: ML22006A103 (2)

Text

From:

Kathy Barnes <greenwoodsart@msn.com>

Sent:

Monday, January 3, 2022 12:45 PM To:

PointBeach-SLRSEIS Resource

Subject:

[External_Sender] Comments for Docket ID: NRC-2020-0277-0194 NRC There is no reason why the license for Point Beach nuclear facility should be extended, but there are a multitude of reasons why to not extend:

- cost of repairs

- danger of operating old nuclear reactors

- leaks

- cleanup should not be put off

- continuation of creating more nuclear waste is an environmental crisis

- using funds for a toxic industry that could be spent on clean technology

- health risks

- increased risks of melt downs from aging reactor parts Nuclear reactors built for 20 years should not be allowed license extensions to 80 years.

Point Beach should not be relicensed. The Great Lakes should be protected, not risked and sacrificed.

Sincerely Kathryn Barnes Dont Waste Michigan Board Member

Federal Register Notice:

86FR62220 Comment Number:

160 Mail Envelope Properties (CH2PR06MB667728A3F4467E4C7B573485B9499)

Subject:

[External_Sender] Comments for Docket ID: NRC-2020-0277-0194 Sent Date:

1/3/2022 12:44:32 PM Received Date:

1/3/2022 12:44:35 PM From:

Kathy Barnes Created By:

greenwoodsart@msn.com Recipients:

"PointBeach-SLRSEIS Resource" <PointBeach-SLRSEIS.Resource@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

CH2PR06MB6677.namprd06.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 761 1/3/2022 12:44:35 PM Options Priority:

Normal Return Notification:

No Reply Requested:

No Sensitivity:

Normal Expiration Date: