ML21050A133

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comment (25) of Mark Giese on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML21050A133
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/18/2021
From: Giese M
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Office of Administration
References
86FR7747 00025, NRC-2020-0277
Download: ML21050A133 (1)


Text

2/19/2021 blob:https://www.fdms.gov/52c473b0-0f70-4bfd-b5eb-66ced8da3001 SUNI Review Complete Template=ADM-013 As of: 2/19/21 8:58 AM E-RIDS=ADM-03 Received: February 18, 2021 PUBLIC SUBMISSION ADD: Phyllis Clark, Bill Rogers, Mary Neely Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. klb-ossr-pu3q Comment (25)

Publication Date:2/1/2021 Comments Due: March 03, 2021 Citation: 86 FR 7747 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2020-0277 Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Comment On: NRC-2020-0277-0001 Notice of Intent To Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Document: NRC-2020-0277-DRAFT-0029 Comment on FR Doc # 2021-02001 Submitter Information Name: Mark Giese Address:

Racine, WI, 53403-3606 Email: m.mk@juno.com Phone: 2626371503 General Comment Wind power as an alternative to 80 years of extended operations at Point Beach nuclear power plant is readily achievable, and should be the preferred alternative. Both onshore and offshore wind power potential should be considered. It is ironic that NextEra (formerly Florida Power & Light) would not include wind power as a viable alternative in its Environmental Report (ER) and license application, considering that if you go to NextEra's website homepage, featured there is a beautiful, powerful photo of large-scale wind turbines filling a vast landscape. Such a visionary scenario is most doable in Wisconsin, both on-land and in Lake Michigan, and should be done, instead of allowing the dangerously age-degraded Point Beach reactors to continue operating for three more decades, or longer. Thank you.

blob:https://www.fdms.gov/52c473b0-0f70-4bfd-b5eb-66ced8da3001 1/1