Similar Documents at Zion |
---|
Category:INSPECTION REPORT
MONTHYEARIR 05000295/19990031999-09-0101 September 1999 Insp Repts 50-295/99-03 & 50-304/99-03 on 990608-0812.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Facility & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19990021999-06-18018 June 1999 Insp Repts 50-295/99-02 & 50-304/99-02 on 990121-0608.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Facility Management & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19980101998-11-0303 November 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-10 & 50-304/98-10 on 980814-1008.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Facility Mgt & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19980091998-09-0808 September 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-09 & 50-304/98-09 on 980626-0813.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Facility Mgt & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19980071998-06-26026 June 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-07 & 50-304/98-07 on 980425-0609.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19980061998-04-23023 April 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-06 & 50-304/98-06 on 980330-0403.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000295/19980041998-03-31031 March 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-04 & 50-304/98-04 on 980203-0313.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19980021998-03-0606 March 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-02 & 50-304/98-02 on 980112-0219.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support ML20203H8841998-02-25025 February 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-32 & 50-304/97-32 on 971217-980202. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Engineering & Plant Support ML20202D7441998-02-0606 February 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-03 & 50-304/98-03 on 980120-23. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Performance & Specifically,Evaluation of Effectiveness of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000295/19970271998-01-30030 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-27 & 50-304/97-27 on 971117-25.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensed Reactor Operator & Senior Reactor Operator Requalification Training Programs ML20199G3461998-01-27027 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-23 & 50-304/97-23 on 970908-1216. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering ML20199A2461998-01-21021 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-25 & 50-304/97-25 on 971011-1216. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19970291998-01-0909 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-29 & 50-304/97-29 on 971202-05.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance During Plant Biennial Exercise of Emergency Plan IR 05000295/19970211997-12-0909 December 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-21 & 50-304/97-21 on 970602-0919.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Developed Phoenix Training Program as Part of Station Restart Action Plan IR 05000295/19970261997-12-0505 December 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-26 & 50-304/97-26 on 971027-31. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support, Performance & Evaluated Effectiveness of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000295/19970311997-12-0404 December 1997 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Repts 50-295/97-31 & 50-304/97-31 on 971201.Violations Noted.Major Areas Discussed:Violations Involving Failures to Adequately Implement fitness-for-duty Program Requirements ML20202D9401997-11-28028 November 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-22 & 50-304/97-22 on 970830-1010. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19970171997-10-10010 October 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-17 & 50-304/97-17 on 970619-0922.No Violations Noted But pre-decisional Enforcement Conference Will Be Scheduled to Discuss Violations Cited.Major Areas inspected:fitness-for-duty Related Events IR 05000295/19970181997-10-0202 October 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-18 & 50-304/97-18 on 970409-0730. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering IR 05000295/19970191997-09-30030 September 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-19 & 50-304/97-19 on 970719-0829. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000295/19970161997-08-28028 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-16 & 50-304/97-16 on 970530-0718. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance & Engineering IR 05000295/19970201997-08-26026 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-20 & 50-304/97-20 on 970728-0801. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Plant Support Performance & Specifically,An Evaluation of Effectiveness of RP Program IR 05000295/19970131997-08-15015 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-13 & 50-304/97-13 on 970404-0529. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support Re Failure to Immediately Notify CR of Fire in Unit 1 Containment Resulting in Violation ML20149G6381997-07-17017 July 1997 Insp Rept 50-295/97-12 on 970311-0425.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering Associated W/Unit 1 Loss of Offsite Power Event That Occurred on 970311 ML20149H9961997-07-16016 July 1997 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Rept on 970703.Areas Discussed:Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-295/97-02, 50-304/97-02,50-295/97-07 & 50-304/97-07 on 970206-0402 & 0312-0428 & Corrective Actions IR 05000295/19970151997-06-26026 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-15 & 50-304/97-15 on 970602-06.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Plant Support Performance & Effectiveness of RP Program ML20140G8291997-06-0404 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-02 & 50-304/97-02 on 970206-0402. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19970141997-05-30030 May 1997 Partially Withheld NRC Security Insp Repts 50-295/97-14 & 50-304/97-14 on 970428-0502 (Ref 10CFR73.21(c)(2). No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Physical Security Program IR 05000295/19970071997-05-21021 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-07 & 50-304/97-07 on 970312-0428. Violations Noted.Major Areas inspected:follow-up on 970225-0307,AIT Insp of Improper Control Rod Manipulation Event ML20148B7831997-05-0606 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-09 & 50-304/97-09 on 970324-0414. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Radiation Protection Program IR 05000295/19970081997-04-30030 April 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-08 & 50-304/97-08 on 970317-21. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Insp Included Review of EP Program,Aspect of Plant Support IR 05000295/19960021997-04-0101 April 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-02 & 50-304/96-02 on 961203-970122.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Discussed:Shipment of Radioactive Matls Exceeding Limits of 49CFR173.425 & Inadequately Training Personnel IAW Procedure ML20137J6871997-03-24024 March 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-20 & 50-304/96-20 on 961207-970205. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000295/19970041997-03-0606 March 1997 Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-295/97-04 & 50-304/97-04 on 970203-07.No Violations Noted.Details Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20134P4881997-02-11011 February 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-21 & 50-304/96-21 on 961203-970122. Apparent Violations Being Considered for Escalated Enforcement Action.Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Protection & Chemistry Controls IR 05000295/19960171997-02-0303 February 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-17 & 50-304/96-17 on 961012-1206. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations, Maint & Engineering ML20134G0481997-01-28028 January 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-14 & 50-304/96-14 on 960824-1011. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance & Engineering IR 05000295/19960131996-12-23023 December 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-13 & 50-304/96-13 on 961001-03,28-30 & 1107.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint. Observed & Reviewed ISI Procedures,Personnel Certifications IR 05000295/19960181996-12-0202 December 1996 Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-295/96-18 & 50-304/96-18 on 961028-1101 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Corrective Actions,Mgt Support,Effectiveness of Mgt Controls & Security Program Plans ML20135B6851996-11-27027 November 1996 Predecisonal Enforcement Conference Repts 50-295/96-11 & 50-304/96-11 on 961112.No Violations Noted.Areas Discussed: Apparent Violations Identified During 960722-0822 Insp Along W/Corrective Actions Taken or Planned by Licensee IR 05000295/19960161996-11-21021 November 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-16 & 50-304/96-16 on 960923-1024. Violations Noted.Major Areas Insp:Radiation Protection Program ML20129E3401996-10-22022 October 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-11 & 50-304/96-11 on 960722-0822. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Team Insp of Engineering & Technical Support ML20129F1121996-10-22022 October 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-10 & 50-304/96-10 on 960713-0829. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering,Plant Support & Security ML20129F0761996-09-16016 September 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-08 & 50-304/96-08 on 960608-0726. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19930241994-01-27027 January 1994 Insp Repts 50-295/93-24 & 50-304/93-24 on 940110-14.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Rp Program,Review of Organizational Changes,Audits & Appraisals & External Exposure Controls IR 05000295/19930231994-01-14014 January 1994 Insp Repts 50-295/93-23 & 50-304/93-23 on 931124-940106. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Outage Activities, Events,Operational Safety,Maintenance & Surveillance IR 05000295/19930181993-12-14014 December 1993 Insp Repts 50-295/93-18 & 50-304/93-18 on 931004-29.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering & Technical Support & Related Mgt Activities ML20058H2611993-12-0707 December 1993 Insp Repts 50-295/93-20 & 50-304/93-20 on 931112-1123. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Resident Insp of Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings,Summary of Outage Activities & Operational Safety Verification IR 05000295/19930211993-12-0101 December 1993 Insp Repts 50-295/93-21 & 50-304/93-21 on 931115-19.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Rp Program,Review of Surveys & Contamination Control 1999-09-01
[Table view] Category:NRC-GENERATED
MONTHYEARIR 05000295/19990031999-09-0101 September 1999 Insp Repts 50-295/99-03 & 50-304/99-03 on 990608-0812.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Facility & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19990021999-06-18018 June 1999 Insp Repts 50-295/99-02 & 50-304/99-02 on 990121-0608.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Facility Management & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19980101998-11-0303 November 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-10 & 50-304/98-10 on 980814-1008.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Facility Mgt & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19980091998-09-0808 September 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-09 & 50-304/98-09 on 980626-0813.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Facility Mgt & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19980071998-06-26026 June 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-07 & 50-304/98-07 on 980425-0609.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19980061998-04-23023 April 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-06 & 50-304/98-06 on 980330-0403.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000295/19980041998-03-31031 March 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-04 & 50-304/98-04 on 980203-0313.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19980021998-03-0606 March 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-02 & 50-304/98-02 on 980112-0219.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support ML20203H8841998-02-25025 February 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-32 & 50-304/97-32 on 971217-980202. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Engineering & Plant Support ML20202D7441998-02-0606 February 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-03 & 50-304/98-03 on 980120-23. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Performance & Specifically,Evaluation of Effectiveness of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000295/19970271998-01-30030 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-27 & 50-304/97-27 on 971117-25.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensed Reactor Operator & Senior Reactor Operator Requalification Training Programs ML20199G3461998-01-27027 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-23 & 50-304/97-23 on 970908-1216. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering ML20199A2461998-01-21021 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-25 & 50-304/97-25 on 971011-1216. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19970291998-01-0909 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-29 & 50-304/97-29 on 971202-05.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance During Plant Biennial Exercise of Emergency Plan IR 05000295/19970211997-12-0909 December 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-21 & 50-304/97-21 on 970602-0919.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Developed Phoenix Training Program as Part of Station Restart Action Plan IR 05000295/19970261997-12-0505 December 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-26 & 50-304/97-26 on 971027-31. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support, Performance & Evaluated Effectiveness of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000295/19970311997-12-0404 December 1997 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Repts 50-295/97-31 & 50-304/97-31 on 971201.Violations Noted.Major Areas Discussed:Violations Involving Failures to Adequately Implement fitness-for-duty Program Requirements ML20202D9401997-11-28028 November 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-22 & 50-304/97-22 on 970830-1010. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19970171997-10-10010 October 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-17 & 50-304/97-17 on 970619-0922.No Violations Noted But pre-decisional Enforcement Conference Will Be Scheduled to Discuss Violations Cited.Major Areas inspected:fitness-for-duty Related Events IR 05000295/19970181997-10-0202 October 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-18 & 50-304/97-18 on 970409-0730. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering IR 05000295/19970191997-09-30030 September 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-19 & 50-304/97-19 on 970719-0829. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000295/19970161997-08-28028 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-16 & 50-304/97-16 on 970530-0718. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance & Engineering IR 05000295/19970201997-08-26026 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-20 & 50-304/97-20 on 970728-0801. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Plant Support Performance & Specifically,An Evaluation of Effectiveness of RP Program IR 05000295/19970131997-08-15015 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-13 & 50-304/97-13 on 970404-0529. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support Re Failure to Immediately Notify CR of Fire in Unit 1 Containment Resulting in Violation ML20149G6381997-07-17017 July 1997 Insp Rept 50-295/97-12 on 970311-0425.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering Associated W/Unit 1 Loss of Offsite Power Event That Occurred on 970311 ML20149H9961997-07-16016 July 1997 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Rept on 970703.Areas Discussed:Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-295/97-02, 50-304/97-02,50-295/97-07 & 50-304/97-07 on 970206-0402 & 0312-0428 & Corrective Actions IR 05000295/19970151997-06-26026 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-15 & 50-304/97-15 on 970602-06.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Plant Support Performance & Effectiveness of RP Program ML20140G8291997-06-0404 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-02 & 50-304/97-02 on 970206-0402. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19970141997-05-30030 May 1997 Partially Withheld NRC Security Insp Repts 50-295/97-14 & 50-304/97-14 on 970428-0502 (Ref 10CFR73.21(c)(2). No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Physical Security Program IR 05000295/19970071997-05-21021 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-07 & 50-304/97-07 on 970312-0428. Violations Noted.Major Areas inspected:follow-up on 970225-0307,AIT Insp of Improper Control Rod Manipulation Event ML20148B7831997-05-0606 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-09 & 50-304/97-09 on 970324-0414. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Radiation Protection Program IR 05000295/19970081997-04-30030 April 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-08 & 50-304/97-08 on 970317-21. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Insp Included Review of EP Program,Aspect of Plant Support IR 05000295/19960021997-04-0101 April 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-02 & 50-304/96-02 on 961203-970122.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Discussed:Shipment of Radioactive Matls Exceeding Limits of 49CFR173.425 & Inadequately Training Personnel IAW Procedure ML20137J6871997-03-24024 March 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-20 & 50-304/96-20 on 961207-970205. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000295/19970041997-03-0606 March 1997 Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-295/97-04 & 50-304/97-04 on 970203-07.No Violations Noted.Details Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20134P4881997-02-11011 February 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-21 & 50-304/96-21 on 961203-970122. Apparent Violations Being Considered for Escalated Enforcement Action.Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Protection & Chemistry Controls IR 05000295/19960171997-02-0303 February 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-17 & 50-304/96-17 on 961012-1206. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations, Maint & Engineering ML20134G0481997-01-28028 January 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-14 & 50-304/96-14 on 960824-1011. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance & Engineering IR 05000295/19960131996-12-23023 December 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-13 & 50-304/96-13 on 961001-03,28-30 & 1107.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint. Observed & Reviewed ISI Procedures,Personnel Certifications IR 05000295/19960181996-12-0202 December 1996 Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-295/96-18 & 50-304/96-18 on 961028-1101 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Corrective Actions,Mgt Support,Effectiveness of Mgt Controls & Security Program Plans ML20135B6851996-11-27027 November 1996 Predecisonal Enforcement Conference Repts 50-295/96-11 & 50-304/96-11 on 961112.No Violations Noted.Areas Discussed: Apparent Violations Identified During 960722-0822 Insp Along W/Corrective Actions Taken or Planned by Licensee IR 05000295/19960161996-11-21021 November 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-16 & 50-304/96-16 on 960923-1024. Violations Noted.Major Areas Insp:Radiation Protection Program ML20129E3401996-10-22022 October 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-11 & 50-304/96-11 on 960722-0822. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Team Insp of Engineering & Technical Support ML20129F1121996-10-22022 October 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-10 & 50-304/96-10 on 960713-0829. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering,Plant Support & Security ML20129F0761996-09-16016 September 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-08 & 50-304/96-08 on 960608-0726. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19930241994-01-27027 January 1994 Insp Repts 50-295/93-24 & 50-304/93-24 on 940110-14.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Rp Program,Review of Organizational Changes,Audits & Appraisals & External Exposure Controls IR 05000295/19930231994-01-14014 January 1994 Insp Repts 50-295/93-23 & 50-304/93-23 on 931124-940106. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Outage Activities, Events,Operational Safety,Maintenance & Surveillance IR 05000295/19930181993-12-14014 December 1993 Insp Repts 50-295/93-18 & 50-304/93-18 on 931004-29.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering & Technical Support & Related Mgt Activities ML20058H2611993-12-0707 December 1993 Insp Repts 50-295/93-20 & 50-304/93-20 on 931112-1123. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Resident Insp of Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings,Summary of Outage Activities & Operational Safety Verification IR 05000295/19930211993-12-0101 December 1993 Insp Repts 50-295/93-21 & 50-304/93-21 on 931115-19.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Rp Program,Review of Surveys & Contamination Control 1999-09-01
[Table view] Category:INSPECTION REPORT
MONTHYEARIR 05000295/19990031999-09-0101 September 1999 Insp Repts 50-295/99-03 & 50-304/99-03 on 990608-0812.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Facility & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19990021999-06-18018 June 1999 Insp Repts 50-295/99-02 & 50-304/99-02 on 990121-0608.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Facility Management & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19980101998-11-0303 November 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-10 & 50-304/98-10 on 980814-1008.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Facility Mgt & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19980091998-09-0808 September 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-09 & 50-304/98-09 on 980626-0813.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Facility Mgt & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19980071998-06-26026 June 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-07 & 50-304/98-07 on 980425-0609.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19980061998-04-23023 April 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-06 & 50-304/98-06 on 980330-0403.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000295/19980041998-03-31031 March 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-04 & 50-304/98-04 on 980203-0313.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19980021998-03-0606 March 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-02 & 50-304/98-02 on 980112-0219.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support ML20203H8841998-02-25025 February 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-32 & 50-304/97-32 on 971217-980202. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Engineering & Plant Support ML20202D7441998-02-0606 February 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-03 & 50-304/98-03 on 980120-23. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Performance & Specifically,Evaluation of Effectiveness of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000295/19970271998-01-30030 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-27 & 50-304/97-27 on 971117-25.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensed Reactor Operator & Senior Reactor Operator Requalification Training Programs ML20199G3461998-01-27027 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-23 & 50-304/97-23 on 970908-1216. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering ML20199A2461998-01-21021 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-25 & 50-304/97-25 on 971011-1216. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19970291998-01-0909 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-29 & 50-304/97-29 on 971202-05.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance During Plant Biennial Exercise of Emergency Plan IR 05000295/19970211997-12-0909 December 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-21 & 50-304/97-21 on 970602-0919.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Developed Phoenix Training Program as Part of Station Restart Action Plan IR 05000295/19970261997-12-0505 December 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-26 & 50-304/97-26 on 971027-31. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support, Performance & Evaluated Effectiveness of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000295/19970311997-12-0404 December 1997 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Repts 50-295/97-31 & 50-304/97-31 on 971201.Violations Noted.Major Areas Discussed:Violations Involving Failures to Adequately Implement fitness-for-duty Program Requirements ML20202D9401997-11-28028 November 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-22 & 50-304/97-22 on 970830-1010. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19970171997-10-10010 October 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-17 & 50-304/97-17 on 970619-0922.No Violations Noted But pre-decisional Enforcement Conference Will Be Scheduled to Discuss Violations Cited.Major Areas inspected:fitness-for-duty Related Events IR 05000295/19970181997-10-0202 October 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-18 & 50-304/97-18 on 970409-0730. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering IR 05000295/19970191997-09-30030 September 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-19 & 50-304/97-19 on 970719-0829. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000295/19970161997-08-28028 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-16 & 50-304/97-16 on 970530-0718. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance & Engineering IR 05000295/19970201997-08-26026 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-20 & 50-304/97-20 on 970728-0801. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Plant Support Performance & Specifically,An Evaluation of Effectiveness of RP Program IR 05000295/19970131997-08-15015 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-13 & 50-304/97-13 on 970404-0529. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support Re Failure to Immediately Notify CR of Fire in Unit 1 Containment Resulting in Violation ML20149G6381997-07-17017 July 1997 Insp Rept 50-295/97-12 on 970311-0425.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering Associated W/Unit 1 Loss of Offsite Power Event That Occurred on 970311 ML20149H9961997-07-16016 July 1997 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Rept on 970703.Areas Discussed:Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-295/97-02, 50-304/97-02,50-295/97-07 & 50-304/97-07 on 970206-0402 & 0312-0428 & Corrective Actions IR 05000295/19970151997-06-26026 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-15 & 50-304/97-15 on 970602-06.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Plant Support Performance & Effectiveness of RP Program ML20140G8291997-06-0404 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-02 & 50-304/97-02 on 970206-0402. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19970141997-05-30030 May 1997 Partially Withheld NRC Security Insp Repts 50-295/97-14 & 50-304/97-14 on 970428-0502 (Ref 10CFR73.21(c)(2). No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Physical Security Program IR 05000295/19970071997-05-21021 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-07 & 50-304/97-07 on 970312-0428. Violations Noted.Major Areas inspected:follow-up on 970225-0307,AIT Insp of Improper Control Rod Manipulation Event ML20148B7831997-05-0606 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-09 & 50-304/97-09 on 970324-0414. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Radiation Protection Program IR 05000295/19970081997-04-30030 April 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-08 & 50-304/97-08 on 970317-21. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Insp Included Review of EP Program,Aspect of Plant Support IR 05000295/19960021997-04-0101 April 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-02 & 50-304/96-02 on 961203-970122.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Discussed:Shipment of Radioactive Matls Exceeding Limits of 49CFR173.425 & Inadequately Training Personnel IAW Procedure ML20137J6871997-03-24024 March 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-20 & 50-304/96-20 on 961207-970205. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000295/19970041997-03-0606 March 1997 Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-295/97-04 & 50-304/97-04 on 970203-07.No Violations Noted.Details Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20134P4881997-02-11011 February 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-21 & 50-304/96-21 on 961203-970122. Apparent Violations Being Considered for Escalated Enforcement Action.Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Protection & Chemistry Controls IR 05000295/19960171997-02-0303 February 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-17 & 50-304/96-17 on 961012-1206. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations, Maint & Engineering ML20134G0481997-01-28028 January 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-14 & 50-304/96-14 on 960824-1011. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance & Engineering IR 05000295/19960131996-12-23023 December 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-13 & 50-304/96-13 on 961001-03,28-30 & 1107.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint. Observed & Reviewed ISI Procedures,Personnel Certifications IR 05000295/19960181996-12-0202 December 1996 Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-295/96-18 & 50-304/96-18 on 961028-1101 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Corrective Actions,Mgt Support,Effectiveness of Mgt Controls & Security Program Plans ML20135B6851996-11-27027 November 1996 Predecisonal Enforcement Conference Repts 50-295/96-11 & 50-304/96-11 on 961112.No Violations Noted.Areas Discussed: Apparent Violations Identified During 960722-0822 Insp Along W/Corrective Actions Taken or Planned by Licensee IR 05000295/19960161996-11-21021 November 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-16 & 50-304/96-16 on 960923-1024. Violations Noted.Major Areas Insp:Radiation Protection Program ML20129E3401996-10-22022 October 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-11 & 50-304/96-11 on 960722-0822. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Team Insp of Engineering & Technical Support ML20129F1121996-10-22022 October 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-10 & 50-304/96-10 on 960713-0829. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering,Plant Support & Security ML20129F0761996-09-16016 September 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-08 & 50-304/96-08 on 960608-0726. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19930241994-01-27027 January 1994 Insp Repts 50-295/93-24 & 50-304/93-24 on 940110-14.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Rp Program,Review of Organizational Changes,Audits & Appraisals & External Exposure Controls IR 05000295/19930231994-01-14014 January 1994 Insp Repts 50-295/93-23 & 50-304/93-23 on 931124-940106. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Outage Activities, Events,Operational Safety,Maintenance & Surveillance IR 05000295/19930181993-12-14014 December 1993 Insp Repts 50-295/93-18 & 50-304/93-18 on 931004-29.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering & Technical Support & Related Mgt Activities ML20058H2611993-12-0707 December 1993 Insp Repts 50-295/93-20 & 50-304/93-20 on 931112-1123. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Resident Insp of Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings,Summary of Outage Activities & Operational Safety Verification IR 05000295/19930211993-12-0101 December 1993 Insp Repts 50-295/93-21 & 50-304/93-21 on 931115-19.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Rp Program,Review of Surveys & Contamination Control 1999-09-01
[Table view] Category:UTILITY
MONTHYEARIR 05000295/19900261990-11-16016 November 1990 Insp Repts 50-295/90-26 & 50-304/90-28 on 901022-26.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Training Concerns & Quality Verification Effectiveness IR 05000295/19900201990-11-0808 November 1990 Insp Repts 50-295/90-20 & 50-304/90-22 on 900910,24-28 & 1018.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Followup of Licensee Actions on Previously Identified Items IR 05000295/19900211990-11-0202 November 1990 Insp Repts 50-295/90-21 & 50-304/90-23 on 900902-1013.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Previous Insp Findings,Summary of Operations,Operational Safety, Surveillance Observation,Maint Observation & LERs IR 05000295/19900221990-10-30030 October 1990 Insp Repts 50-295/90-22 & 50-304/90-24 on 900924-1012. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Protection Program IR 05000295/19900191990-10-22022 October 1990 Insp Repts 50-295/90-19 & 50-304/90-21 on 900813-1003.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Physical Security Insp Involving Mgt Support,Security Program Plans,Audits, Protected & Vital Area Access Control IR 05000295/19900181990-09-24024 September 1990 Insp Repts 50-295/90-18 & 50-304/90-20 on 900730-0803.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operability of Svc Water Sys IR 05000295/19900151990-09-0505 September 1990 Insp Repts 50-295/90-15 & 50-304/90-17 on 900716-0808. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Liquid & Solid Radwaste Mgt & Transportation Programs,Including Organizational,Mgt Controls & Training IR 05000295/19900111990-09-0404 September 1990 Insp Repts 50-295/90-11 & 50-304/90-13 on 900424-0508 & 29. Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Work Assignments of Licensee Employee Involved in Unmonitored Discharge of Radwaste IR 05000295/19900121990-08-0202 August 1990 Insp Repts 50-295/90-12 & 50-304/90-14 on 900717-19.No Violations,Deficiencies or Deviations Noted.One Exercise Weakness Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Annual Emergency Preparedness Exercise IR 05000295/19900161990-07-30030 July 1990 Insp Repts 50-295/90-16 & 50-304/90-18 on 900702-06,16 & 20. No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Chemistry Program,Procedures,Organization & Training IR 05000304/19900121990-06-29029 June 1990 Insp Rept 50-304/90-12 on 900430-0510.Major Areas Inspected: Inservice Insp Related Activities,Steam Generator Indications,Mods,Erosion/Corrosion & Pipe Supports IR 05000295/19900071990-06-22022 June 1990 Insp Repts 50-295/90-07 & 50-304/90-07 on 900414-0602.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Summary of Operations,Operational Safety Verification & ESF Sys Walkdown,Surveillance/Maint Observation & Technical Support IR 05000295/19890231989-09-14014 September 1989 Insp Repts 50-295/89-23 & 50-304/89-21 on 890717-21 & 0811. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Implementation of Licensee Fire Protection Program,Including Actions on Previous Insp Findings IR 05000295/19890251989-09-14014 September 1989 Insp Repts 50-295/89-25 & 50-304/89-23 on 890209-0807.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Applicable Portions of Plant Security Program Re Alleged Inadequate Performance & Mgt Practices within Licensee Security Organization IR 05000295/19890241989-09-0808 September 1989 Insp Repts 50-295/89-24 & 50-304/89-22 on 890731-0829.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Confirmatory Measurements & Radiological Environ Monitoring Including Review of Open Items Audits & Appraisals IR 05000295/19890181989-08-30030 August 1989 Insp Repts 50-295/89-18 & 50-304/89-17 on 890619-23 & 0717-21 & 24.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint, Support of Maint & Related Mgt Activities ML20246K9781989-08-25025 August 1989 Enforcement Conference Repts 50-295/89-26 & 50-304/89-24. Major Areas Discussed:Enforcement Options,Circumstances Surrounding & Corrective Actions in Response to Potential Violations of Security Plan IR 05000295/19890201989-07-28028 July 1989 Insp Repts 50-295/89-20 & 50-304/89-18 on 890619-0714.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Liquid & Solid Radwaste Mgt & Transportation Programs,Including Organization & Mgt Controls & Compliance w/10CFR61 IR 05000295/19890151989-07-24024 July 1989 Safety Insp Repts 50-295/89-15 & 50-304/89-15 on 890509-0629.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Action on Previous Insp Findings,Summary of Operations & 890508 Unplanned Gas Release Due to Personnel Error IR 05000295/19890191989-06-16016 June 1989 Insp Rept 50-295/89-19 on 890331.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Discussed:Containment Spray Valve 1 MOV CS-0049 Being Inoperable & Rendering One Train of Containment Spray Sys Unable to Function in Recirculation Mode IR 05000295/19890161989-06-16016 June 1989 Insp Repts 50-295/89-16 & 50-304/89-16 on 890515-31.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Previously Identified Findings Re Environ Qualification of Electrical Equipment IR 05000295/19890121989-05-17017 May 1989 Insp Repts 50-295/89-12 & 50-304/89-12 on 890420 & 0502-05. No Violations,Deviations or Deficiencies Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Annual Emergency Preparedness Exercise IR 05000295/19890081989-04-10010 April 1989 Insp Repts 50-295/89-08 & 50-304/89-08 on 890210-0323. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings,Summary Operations & 890219 Shutdown of Unit 2 to Repair Failed Control Rod IR 05000295/19890021989-03-0808 March 1989 Insp Repts 50-295/89-02 & 50-304/89-02 on 890104-0217. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Insp of Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings,Summary of Operations & 890115 Unit 1 Shutdown for Steam Generator Tube Leakage IR 05000295/19890061989-03-0303 March 1989 Insp Repts 50-295/89-06 & 50-304/89-06 on 890214-17.Major Areas Inspected:Emergency Preparedness Program,Licensee Action on Previously Identified Items,Emergency Plan Activations & Operational Status of Program IR 05000295/19890071989-02-24024 February 1989 Enforcement Conference Repts 50-295/89-07 & 50-304/89-07 on 890216.Major Areas Discussed:Radioactive Matl Transport & Safeguards Events,Apparent Violations Associated W/Events & Licensee Perspective & Corrective Actions IR 05000295/19880251989-02-23023 February 1989 Insp Repts 50-295/88-25 & 50-304/88-25 on 881215-890104.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Protection Program,Including Organization & Mgt Controls,Changes in Organization,Personnel,Facilities,Equipment & Procedures IR 05000295/19880041988-11-28028 November 1988 Addendum to Insp Repts 50-295/88-04 & 50-304/88-05, Consisting of Comparisons of Results of Liquid Spike Sent to Plant & Criteria for Comparing Analytical Measurements IR 05000295/19880191988-11-25025 November 1988 Insp Repts 50-295/88-19 & 50-304/88-19 on 880824-1110. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings,Summary of Operations,Unit 2 Trip on 881008 & 12 & 881019 Unit 2 Valve Block Slippage IR 05000295/19880241988-11-22022 November 1988 Insp Repts 50-295/88-24 & 50-304/88-24 on 881024-28.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Chemistry Program, Including Procedures,Organization & Training & Primary & Secondary Sys Water QC Programs IR 05000295/19880181988-10-20020 October 1988 Insp Repts 50-295/88-18 & 50-304/88-18 on 880927-29 & 1014. No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Annual Emergency Preparedness Exercise.Four Exercise Weaknesses Identified Which Will Require Corrective Action IR 05000295/19880201988-09-27027 September 1988 Insp Repts 50-295/88-20 & 50-304/88-20 on 880831-0902. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Liquid & Solid Radwaste Program,Including Organization & Mgt Controls, Effluent Releases & Records/Repts of Releases IR 05000295/19880161988-09-0909 September 1988 Insp Repts 50-295/88-16 & 50-304/88-16 on 880720-0823.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operational Safety Verification & Engineered Safety Feature Sys Walkdown, Surveillance Observation & Maint Observation IR 05000295/19880031988-08-12012 August 1988 Safety Sys Outage Mod Insp Rept 50-295/88-03 on 880329-0602. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Design,Installation & Testing of Several Mods to Be Performed During Outage & Util Corrective Action Program IR 05000295/19880151988-08-11011 August 1988 Insp Rept 50-295/88-15 on 880628-30 & 0803.Open Item Re Bench Testing of Crosby Valves Noted.Major Areas Inspected: LER 88-012 Re Test Methods of Main Steam Safety Valves Exceeding High Setpoint Tolerance When Tested by Steam IR 05000295/19880131988-08-0808 August 1988 Insp Repts 50-295/88-13 & 50-304/88-14 on 880526-0719.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Licensee Action on Previous Findings,Summary of Operations & Main Steam Safety Valves Set Nonconservatively IR 05000295/19880121988-06-22022 June 1988 Insp Repts 50-295/88-12 & 50-304/88-13 on 880414-0603. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Previous Findings,Summary of Operations,Unit 1 Startup from Refueling & Testing of Accumulator Backup Check Valves IR 05000295/19880021988-06-0202 June 1988 Insp Repts 50-295/88-02 & 50-304/88-03 on 871124-880407.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Review of Allegations Received by Region Iii,Including Drug Use by Personnel Employed at Plant & Harassment Re Safety Concerns IR 05000295/19880111988-05-26026 May 1988 Insp Repts 50-295/88-11 & 50-304/88-12 on 880418-29.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Radiation Protection Program During Refueling/Maint Outage, Including,Organization & Mgt Controls IR 05000295/19880101988-05-24024 May 1988 Insp Repts 50-295/88-10 & 50-304/88-11 on 880405-21. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Previous Insp Findings,Lers & Snubber Surveillance & Functional Testing IR 05000295/19880091988-04-27027 April 1988 Insp Repts 50-295/88-09 & 50-304/88-10 on 880225-0413. Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings,Summary of Operations & Erroneous Setting of Main Steam Safety Valve Lift Setpoints on 880329 ML20148R7111988-04-0707 April 1988 Insp Repts 50-295/87-34 & 50-304/87-35 on 871116-880314. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Assessment of Compliance w/10CFR50,App R & Review of Fire Protection Program Requirements IR 05000295/19880051988-03-25025 March 1988 Insp Repts 50-295/88-05 & 50-304/88-06 on 880115-0224.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Action on Previous Insp Findings,Summary of Operations,Operational Safety Verification,Lers & IE Bulletins IR 05000295/19880071988-03-15015 March 1988 Safety Insp Repts 50-295/88-07 & 50-304/88-08 on 880302-04. No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Containment Leak Rate Test (Cilrt) Procedure & Performance Witnessing & Review of Cilrt Results IR 05000295/19880081988-03-0202 March 1988 Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-295/88-08 & 50-304/88-09 on 880201-19.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Circumstances Surrounding Inadequate Search of Package Matl Observed on 880201 IR 05000295/19880061988-02-23023 February 1988 Insp Repts 50-295/88-06 & 50-304/88-07 on 880208-11.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Emergency Preparedness Program,Including Licensee Action on Previously Identified Areas & Emergency Plan Activations ML20149F8991988-02-10010 February 1988 Insp Repts 50-295/88-04 & 50-304/88-05 on 880112-15 & 19.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Qa & Confirmatory Measures for in-plant Radiochemical Analyses & Action on Open Items Previously Identified ML20150C3281988-02-0909 February 1988 Insp Repts 50-295/87-24 & 50-304/87-25 on 870914-18.One Open Item Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Check Valve Testing Program,Check Valve Location,Check Valve Maint & Failure History & Response to INPO Event Rept 86-3 IR 05000295/19870361988-01-27027 January 1988 Insp Repts 50-295/87-36 & 50-304/87-37 on 871120-880114. Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operational Safety Verification & ESF Sys Walkdown & Inspector Followup of IE Bulletin 87-002 IR 05000295/19870381988-01-0707 January 1988 Insp Repts 50-295/87-38 & 50-304/87-39 on 871207-17. Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Actions Re IE Bulletin 84-02 & Licensee Implementation of Generic Ltr 83-28 in Areas Including Equipment Classification 1990-09-05
[Table view] Category:TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
MONTHYEARIR 05000295/19990031999-09-0101 September 1999 Insp Repts 50-295/99-03 & 50-304/99-03 on 990608-0812.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Facility & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety ML20210C3781999-07-20020 July 1999 Notice of Violation from Insp on 990318.Violations Noted: on 980224,individual Attempted to Enter Protected Area of Plant with Firearm.Search Equipment Operator Failed to Failed to Secure Item & Prevent Access ML20210C4301999-07-20020 July 1999 Notice of Violation from Investigation on 990318.Violation Noted:On 980224,recipient Caused Util to Be in Violation of Section 2.C.6 of Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48.Recipient Attempted to Enter Protected Area of Station with Handgun IR 05000295/19990021999-06-18018 June 1999 Insp Repts 50-295/99-02 & 50-304/99-02 on 990121-0608.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Facility Management & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety ML20205P2211999-04-0909 April 1999 Notice of Violation from Insp & Investigation Completed on 981112.Violation Noted:From Approx July,1997 to 980122,SGI Was Not Stored in Locked Storage Container While Unattended IR 05000295/19980101998-11-0303 November 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-10 & 50-304/98-10 on 980814-1008.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Facility Mgt & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19980091998-09-0808 September 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-09 & 50-304/98-09 on 980626-0813.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Facility Mgt & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19980071998-06-26026 June 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-07 & 50-304/98-07 on 980425-0609.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support PNO-III-98-030, on 980517,armed Security Guard on Patrol in Owner Controlled Area Reported to Security Person Lying Near Road.Guard Subsequently Reported Being Shot.No Intruder Found.Guard Admitted Shooting Himself in Foot1998-05-18018 May 1998 PNO-III-98-030:on 980517,armed Security Guard on Patrol in Owner Controlled Area Reported to Security Person Lying Near Road.Guard Subsequently Reported Being Shot.No Intruder Found.Guard Admitted Shooting Himself in Foot IR 05000295/19980061998-04-23023 April 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-06 & 50-304/98-06 on 980330-0403.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000295/19980041998-03-31031 March 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-04 & 50-304/98-04 on 980203-0313.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19980021998-03-0606 March 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-02 & 50-304/98-02 on 980112-0219.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support ML20203H8841998-02-25025 February 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-32 & 50-304/97-32 on 971217-980202. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Engineering & Plant Support ML20203H8601998-02-25025 February 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 971217-980202.Violation Noted:Licensee Returned to Svc Valves 2FW0038 & 2FW0042 in Locked Position Instead of Locked Closed Position ML20202D7291998-02-0606 February 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970120-23.Violation Noted: on 980115,radiation Protection Technician Performed Calibration of Auxiliary Bldg Exit Personnel Contamination Monitor & Failed to Reset Monitor to Initial Setting ML20202D7441998-02-0606 February 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-03 & 50-304/98-03 on 980120-23. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Performance & Specifically,Evaluation of Effectiveness of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000295/19970271998-01-30030 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-27 & 50-304/97-27 on 971117-25.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensed Reactor Operator & Senior Reactor Operator Requalification Training Programs ML20199G3461998-01-27027 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-23 & 50-304/97-23 on 970908-1216. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering ML20199G3271998-01-27027 January 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970908-1216.Violation Noted:As of 970724,licensee Failed to Ensure That Training Provided to Selected Contractor Craft & Quality Control Insp Personnel Performing Raychem Splice Applications ML20199A2461998-01-21021 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-25 & 50-304/97-25 on 971011-1216. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 07100011/20120161998-01-21021 January 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 971011-1216.Violations Noted:Procedures Were Not Appropriate to Circumstances in Listed Instances PNO-III-98-006, on 980115,licensee Announced Permanent Shut Down of Station.Util Plans to Maintain Plant in Safstor Decommissioning Mode Until Approx 20141998-01-15015 January 1998 PNO-III-98-006:on 980115,licensee Announced Permanent Shut Down of Station.Util Plans to Maintain Plant in Safstor Decommissioning Mode Until Approx 2014 ML20198P5561998-01-15015 January 1998 Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $110,000.Violations Noted:Three FFD Trained Supervisors Failed to Require for-cause Test for Employee W/Smell of Alcohol in Protected Area ML20216D7411998-01-12012 January 1998 EN-98-002:on 980115,notice of Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $110,000 Issued to Licensee.Action Based on Severity Level III Problem Involving Implementation of fitness-for-duty Program at Zion Station IR 05000295/19970291998-01-0909 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-29 & 50-304/97-29 on 971202-05.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance During Plant Biennial Exercise of Emergency Plan IR 05000295/19970211997-12-0909 December 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-21 & 50-304/97-21 on 970602-0919.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Developed Phoenix Training Program as Part of Station Restart Action Plan ML20203E5111997-12-0505 December 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 971027-31.Violation Noted:On 971017-18,entrance to Truck Bay of Radioactive High Level Waste Area Was Not Locked & Personnel Did Not Have Direct Oversight IR 05000295/19970261997-12-0505 December 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-26 & 50-304/97-26 on 971027-31. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support, Performance & Evaluated Effectiveness of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000295/19970311997-12-0404 December 1997 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Repts 50-295/97-31 & 50-304/97-31 on 971201.Violations Noted.Major Areas Discussed:Violations Involving Failures to Adequately Implement fitness-for-duty Program Requirements ML20202D9291997-11-28028 November 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970830-1010.Violation Noted:On 970910,while Returning QA Fire Pump Breaker to Svc IAW out-of-svc Number 970009297,non-licensed Operator Did Not Close Control Power Knife Switch as Required ML20202D9401997-11-28028 November 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-22 & 50-304/97-22 on 970830-1010. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19970171997-10-10010 October 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-17 & 50-304/97-17 on 970619-0922.No Violations Noted But pre-decisional Enforcement Conference Will Be Scheduled to Discuss Violations Cited.Major Areas inspected:fitness-for-duty Related Events IR 05000295/19970181997-10-0202 October 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-18 & 50-304/97-18 on 970409-0730. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering ML20211J7991997-10-0202 October 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970409-0730.Violation Noted:Zion Station Measures to Control Matls Were Inadequate & Did Not Prevent Installation of Following,From 1992 to 1997,high Efficiency Particulate Air Filters ML20217F0861997-09-30030 September 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970719-0829.Violation Noted:On 970827,engineering Contractor Operated 2C Svc Water Pump Lower Bearing Suppl Isolation valve,2SW0624,w/o Authorization from Operations Dept IR 05000295/19970191997-09-30030 September 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-19 & 50-304/97-19 on 970719-0829. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering ML20217A3371997-09-12012 September 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 961207-970527.Violation Noted:During 1996 Unit 2 Refueling Outage,Irradiated Fuel Was Moved & Fuel Was Stored in Pool W/Less than 60 Days Decay Time & Fuel Bldg Exhaust Sys Was Operating PNO-III-97-071, on 970903,Comm Ed Announced Series of Mgt Changes & Restructuring of Nuclear Div Organization.New Site Vice Presidents at Braidwood & Quad Cities Former Plant Managers.State of Il Will Be Notified of Mgt Changes1997-09-0303 September 1997 PNO-III-97-071:on 970903,Comm Ed Announced Series of Mgt Changes & Restructuring of Nuclear Div Organization.New Site Vice Presidents at Braidwood & Quad Cities Former Plant Managers.State of Il Will Be Notified of Mgt Changes ML20217R2441997-09-0202 September 1997 Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $330,000.Violation Noted:Primary Nso Did Not Establish Power at or Less than Point of Adding Heat IAW GOP-4,step 5.21.f IR 05000295/19970161997-08-28028 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-16 & 50-304/97-16 on 970530-0718. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance & Engineering ML20216C4801997-08-28028 August 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970530-0718.Violation Noted:On 970510,during Performance of OSP 97-012,section 5.58,licensee Failed to Close 3L Kiene Valve ML20211C9071997-08-27027 August 1997 EN-97-080:on 970902,notice of Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $330,000 Issued to Licensee.Action Based on Three Severity Level III Violations Pertaining to Reactivity Mgt Problems & Command/Control Problems IR 05000295/19970201997-08-26026 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-20 & 50-304/97-20 on 970728-0801. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Plant Support Performance & Specifically,An Evaluation of Effectiveness of RP Program ML20217R3411997-08-26026 August 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970728-0801.Violation Noted:High Radiation Area W/Radiation Levels Greater than 1000 Mrem/Hr Was Not Locked & Personnel Did Not Have Direct Oversight of & Positive Control Over Each Entry Into Area IR 05000295/19970131997-08-15015 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-13 & 50-304/97-13 on 970404-0529. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support Re Failure to Immediately Notify CR of Fire in Unit 1 Containment Resulting in Violation ML20217P9661997-08-15015 August 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970404-0529.Violations Noted:Fire Resulted When Mechanical Maint Personnel Did Not Ensure That Adequate Natural or Mechanical Ventilation Was Established While Applying Flammable Lubricant to Rv Holes ML20149G6381997-07-17017 July 1997 Insp Rept 50-295/97-12 on 970311-0425.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering Associated W/Unit 1 Loss of Offsite Power Event That Occurred on 970311 ML20149G6341997-07-17017 July 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970311-0425.Violation Noted:On 970311,licensee Identified That Procedure Did Not Exist for Responding to Loss of Offsite Power That Resulted When Unit 1 Sys Auxiliary Transformer Tripped ML20149H9961997-07-16016 July 1997 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Rept on 970703.Areas Discussed:Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-295/97-02, 50-304/97-02,50-295/97-07 & 50-304/97-07 on 970206-0402 & 0312-0428 & Corrective Actions IR 05000295/19970151997-06-26026 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-15 & 50-304/97-15 on 970602-06.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Plant Support Performance & Effectiveness of RP Program 1999-09-01
[Table view] |
See also: IR 05000295/1987002
Text
. . .
.
.
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
ReportsNo.-50-295/87002(DRSS);50-304/87002(DRSS)
Docket Nos. 50-295; 50-304 Licenses No. DPR-39; DPR-48
- Licensee: Commonwealth Edison Company
Post Office Box 767
Chicago, IL 60690
Facility Name: Zion Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2
,
Inspection At: Zion Site, Zion, Illinois
Inspection Conducted: February 23-27, 1987
N 3l2lg7
Inspectors: T. Ploski /
Date
[$ ' '
- '7
r/ N. Williamsen /
Date
l0.
Approved By: W. Sne 1, Chief Wit /s ,
Emergency Preparedness Date~
Section
Inspection Summary
Inspection-on February 23-27, 1987 (Reports No. 50-295/87002(DRSS);
No. 50-304/87002(DR55))
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of the following areas
of the emergency preparedness program: licensee action on previously
identified items; emergency plan activations; operational status of the
emergency preparedness program; emergency detection and classification';
protective action decisionmaking; notifications and communications;
changes to the program; shift staffing and augmentation provisions;
knowledge and performance of duties (training); and licensee audits.
No violations, deficiencies, or deviations were identified.
,
Results:
An Unresolved Item is discussed in Paragraph 3 of the Inspection Report.
,
8703200395 870313
PDR ADOCK 05000295
o PDR
,
., ,,-, , ,, , , , , - - . . - - . - - . , - - --
-m-
.
..
DETAILS
. 1.- Persons. Contacted
- G. Plim1, Station Manager.
- C. Schultz,. Regulatory Assurance Supervisor
- W. Stone, Quality Assurance Supervisor
- A. Nykiel, GSEP Coordinator
- L. Lanes, Rad Chem Staff-
- W. Cramer,. Training Department Staff
- J. Yon Quality Control Staff
- G. O'Neill, Corporate Emergency Planner
T. Blackmon, Cor) orate Emergency Planning Supervirer
W. Otterson, GSE) Training Instructor-
J. Wennerholm, Shift Foreman
D. Schueller, Shift Foreman
S. Kaplan, Station Control Room Engineer (SCRE)
M. Manning, SCRE
E. Campbell, Master' Instrument Mechanic
T. Printz, Assistant Tech Staff Supervisor
W. T'Niemi, Master Mechanic
J. Barr, Corporate' Emergency Planning Staff
T. Blake, Training Instructor
C. Lundstrom, Assistant Storekeeper
~K. Mahoney, Staff Assistant
- Indicates those who attended the February 27, 1987 exit interview.
2. Licensee Action on Previously Identified Items
(0 pen) Items No. 295/84010-01; 295/85008-01; 304/84010-01; and
304/85009-01: These items related to the need for the licensee to
re-evaluate specific Emergency' Action Levels (EALs). By correspondence
dated January 12, 1987, the staff provided comments to the licensee on
the proposed revisions to the Zion Station's EALs. As indicated in
Paragraph 5 of this Inspection Report, the staff has interacted with
the licensee to resolve the concerns expressed on the proposed EALs.
It is anticipated that all the concerns will be resolved prior to the
1987 exercise. These items remain open.
(Closed) Items No. 50-295/86001-02 and 50-304/86001-02: During the 1986
exercise, excessive time was taken to declare the EOF fully operational
and in command of emergency response activities. A letter explaining
the philosophy of facility minimum staffing was distributed to appropriate
exercise participants. This item is closed.
i
2
&
.
(Clos'ed) Items No. 50-295/86001-01 and 50-304/86001-01: During the
1986 exercise,thelicenseefailedtodemonstratetheexerciseobjective
of notifying the NRC Operations Center within one hour of the initial
emergency classification. A review of notification requirements and
relevant procedures was conducted as a part of scheduled licensed-
operator requalification training, as the licensee had comitted.
This training was also provided to persons assigned as Station Directors.
Personnel unable to attend a training session accomplished the remedial
training through required readings. This item is closed.
(Closed) Items No. 295/86007-01 and 304/86007-01: The footnotet
associated with the emergency plan's Figure 6.3-1 must be included in
procedural guidance reproduced in Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures
(EPIPs) 100-1 and 110-1. The inspector determined that these footnotes
had been added to the protective action recommendation guidance contained
in EPIPs 100-1 and 110-1. This item is closed.
(Closed) Items No. 295/86007-02 and 304/86007-02: Revise the "GSEP
Callout Checklist", as well as its source document (EPIP 320-1), to
specify that every, type of Station Group Director must be called out for
any Alert declaration. The inspector reviewed the current revisions of
both documents and determined that both had been revised to accurately
reflect this emergency plan commitment. This item is closed.
3. Emergency Plan Activations
The inspector reviewed licensee and NRC records associated with all four
emergency plan activations which occurred between March 21,'1986 and
February 21, 1987. Records reviewed included:
the StationShift
s EALs;ineer's
Eng
Licensee
logs and NARSEvent Reports
forms (LERs)
associated withfor theevent
each period in question;ilable);
(where ava and
summary records of each declaration available from the NRC Operations
Center.
All four situations were properly classified as Unusual Events. The
States of Illinois and Wisconsin were adequately informed of.the three
events which occurred during 1986, while the NRC Operations Center was
initially informed of all four events in an adequate and timely manner.
However, Nuclear Accident Reporting System (NARS) forms associated with
the February 1987 event had apparently been misplaced onsite and were not
available for the inspector's review. Thus, the inspector could not
verify the contents of the initial notification message or the times that
'
both States had been initially notified. The licensee did not provide
evidence during this inspection, obtained from the appropriate Illinois
and Wisconsin state agencies, as to when they had received the initial
notification messages for the February 1987 Unusual Event. The adequacy
of the initial natifications to the States of Illinois and Wisconsin for
the February 1987 Unusual Event declaration is an Unresolved Item.
.
(304/87002-01)
3
- -
~.
, .
.
n -'
_ - :- .
- - -
.
' ' -
zy. ~
-
~ - - - - ~ - -
u .; '
- > -;
I 5 Y '
_
-A q
<
a .
-
. GSEP ACTIVATIONS'
- *
March 21,'1986 through February 21 1987 i
.
Illinois
^
'
.
< .
Wisconsin .
+NRC
.
' Declaration: Initially' . Initially- . Initially 4
,
Date- Time Notified ' Notified -Notified
5/16/86 0530' 0540 0545- 0607
'
n 16/15/86- 21320~ 1320 1325- 1329
' '
7/5/86 2250 2300 2305 2310
{
2/3/87 =0200~ * * 0220-
- Information unavailable during this inspection.
With the exception of the-Unresolved Item, this_ portion of the licensee's
program is acceptable.
! 4. -Operational Status of the Emergency Preparedness Program (82701)
a. Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedures
-
By correspondence dated May 31, 1985, the staff approved Revision 4~
-
of the Zion Annex to the Generating Stations Emergency Plan (GSEP).
1 In October 1986, the licensee submitted proposed Revision 6 to the -
1 GSEP. By letter dated January 6; 1987, the licensee was-notified
E that Revision 6 was acce The staff did
4 not accept the licensee'ptable s proposal with
to one exception.
significantly reduce
consideration of evacuation time estimates during offsite protective.
-
action decisionmaking. It was, therefore, agreed that the wording
. of the GSEP would not.be changed from that found acceptable in
Revision 5/5A regarding the use of evacuation time estimates pending
- " resolution of the NRC staff's concern. On February 27, 1987, the
licensee provided the inspectors with a copy of proposed Revision 6A
to the GSEP, which was intended to address the staff's concern and
-
also introduce several other changes in the GSEP. The' inspectors' -
agreed to provide comments on Revision 6A by March 17, 1987, which
was also set as the final-date for comments from the licensee's
L nuclear stations to its corporate emergency staff.
- A random review of changes to the Zion Station's implementing
procedures was conducted to determine if changes had been reviewed,
approved and distributed in accordance with licensee procedures-
and NRC requirements. Procedural changes were usually initiated ,
by the GSEP Coordinator, reviewed by cognizant personnel, and
approved by the Services Superintendent. Copies of changes to
implementing procedures were sent to appropriate individuals and ,
organizations in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q). :
,
{ t
'
,
,..
, ~ . . _. _ . , - ,,.._,-,_,,,,,_._.,,._,_,,...,__,.-.-,_.,,.,,__.-,.._,,,._,_,.__...._,_,,._.,...,,,,...,,.-,.._,_.,_,._,c
_-
.
.
The inspectors spot-checked the EPIPs for consistency with the GSEP
and/or with each other. Section 6.1 of the GSEP stated that for
events classified as an Alert, Site Area Emergency, or as a General-
Emergency, the licensee would provide followup messages to State and
Llocal authorities, with message contents per the guidance in
NUREG-0654, llevision 1. However, EPIP 100-1, " Acting Station
Director (Shift Engineer) Implementing Procedure," required that
such followup messages be transmitted for all emergency declarations,
' including the Unusual Event class.
EPIP 190-1, ." Communications Director," included guidance for the
approval and contents of periodic followup messages that was in
accordance with the GSEP. However, the> procedure did not indicate
how these messages would be documented, as regards their contents,
their approval prior to transmittal, and the persons who received
the messages.
Activation and operation of the TSC and OSC were addressed in
EPIP 410-1 "0nsite Sup) ort Centers." Habitability criteria for
thesefaciiitiesandotleronsitelocationswerespecifiedonlyin
EPIP 180-1, " Rad / Chem Director." Thus, a statement in EPIP 410-1
that indicated that the TSC would be evacuated if radiation levels
became excessive in the Station or Environs Director's opinion was
in that " excess" radiation levels were already defined
misleading
in the Rad /, Chem Director's procedure. EPIP 410-1 also indicated
that TSC functions would be re-established by some TSC staff from
However
the CR following a TSC evacuation. locations shouldfor
there-establishing
primary OSC OSC ac
be evacuated.
Based on the above findings, this portion of the licensee's program
is acceptable; however,.the following items should be considered
for improvement:
- EPIP 100-1 should be revised to indicate that periodic followup
messages should be provided per the commitment in the GSEP.
- EPIP 190-1 should include guidance on how to document followup
message contents, approval, and the message recipients.
'
- EPIP 410-1 should be revised to indicate that radiation
levels warranting onsite ERF evacuation have been specified
in EPIP 180-1.
- The licensee should identify in an approariate EPIP one or
more alternate locations for an OSC in tie event that the
primary OSC becomes uninhabitable.
b. Emergency Facilities, Equipment, and Supplies
The inspector toured the Control Room (CR), onsite Emergency
Response Facilities (ERFs), and the nearsite Emergency Operations
l
Facility (E0F) with the GSEP Coordinator. The inspector also
l
,
5
L
. . . . .. - . - . ... . - .. .. -- . - - . - - - .
o c _ a
.
-
,
.
-
s.
'j
-
' '
"
discussed changes to.the EOF and Joint.Public Information Center ~
,
- (JPIC) with the coordinator-and.a member of the corporate emergency
< planning staff.
- Work'.had begun .in the~ CR to create a large center desk workspace. '
- -In the interim, emergency communications equipment described in the
GSEP, Zion Annex to the GSEP, and the Emergency Plan Implementing
Procedures (EPIPs) had been repositioned on desks away from the
central ~ area.of the CR. Sufficient copies of blank Nuclear Accident
Reporting, System (NARS) forms and the NRC' Duty Officer's event
.[ notification checklist were. in the Station Control Room Engineer'.s
-(SCRE). desk. Controlled copies of the GSEP and EPIPs were also
available-in the Control Room.
'
~The TSC was located'as described in the Zion Annex to the GSEP.
t Although the workspace was configured for use as a TSC,.it has ,
c been utilized for some. years as a normal workspace and records
4
storage area for operating shift personnel. The Shift Engineer's ;
- office.in the TSC would become the NRC office upon arrival of Site
M. Team personnel. Workstations for director personnel were ready
e > for use in the western portion of.the room near the status boards
, and dedicated emergency telephone equipment.- Commercial HPN
telephone instruments were installed and operable in the TSC. One
i 4
instrument was in the SE's office and the other was at the Environs.
L Director's workstation. Several telephones were reserved for'NRC
l use in the TSC. Each was linked to multiple commercial lines and'
t inplant extensions. Central files personnel were responsible for
maintaining controlled documents kept in the TSC. Emergency
r areparedness related documents included: the GSEP; Zion Annex;
EPIPs; generic Illinois Plan for Radiological Accidents
Zion Annex (Volume V) to the IPRA; the State of Wisconsin (IPRA);-
Emergency
Plan; the NRC Region'III plan; and Environmental Director
~
l
, -(ED-series) and Env_ironmental Emergency (EG-series) procedures.
I
,. Based on observations during past emergency _ preparedness exercises,
- the TSC is a congested workspace. Locations of some dedicated
- -phones and status boards are inconvenient. Status board design and a
! layout have also been criticized. The licensee indicated that the
i TSC'slayouthadbeenonesubjectofa1986humanfactorsassessment
performed by a contractor. However, the GSEP Coordinator indicated i
!
L that-few changes to the facility's layout would likely be made prior
to the 1987 exercise.
In November 1986, the licensee informed the resident inspectors that'
.
the TSC's ventilation system could not be demonstrated to maintain a
( positivepressurerelativetoadjoiningareas. Thus, in the event
i
of high airborne activity and excessive leakage, the facility could
become uninhabitable. Other regional staff are monitoring the -
1 licensee's efforts to correct this problem. Nevertheless, the
- licensee has committed to construct a new TSC at a yet to be
L' determined location within the protected area. The inspector
4 discussedthisprojectwiththeStationManagerandtheGSEP ,
,
b
6
4
-
i
-- =
..._
.
-
A
,
.
.
J Coordinator. :The former' estimated that a decision would be made-
- '
by mid-1987 ~asLto where the new TSC would be built,-and that -
construction could take approximately 18 months. . The inspector
reviewed an internal draft report, dated January 1987, regarding
plans for. 'a multi-story. Service Building extension project. The-
report did~not identify a TSC as part of this construction: project.
-The. Station Manager indicated that the new TSC might not be in the.
proposed Service Building extension. In any event, the inspector
- - concluded that a comprehensive, formal appraisal-of the Zion
Station's-ERFs by the NRC should not take place until the.new TSC
4
has been completed.
'
.-
The Station's Operational Support Center-(OSC) was a split facility.~
- OSCsupervisoryandmaintenancepersonnelwouldassembleinadjacent
offices located on the second level of the Service Building, while
radiation chemistry staff would gather-in the Rad Protection work
areas on the 617 foot elevation of the Auxiliary Building. However,
-
the licensee indicated that there were plans to test the feasibility ,
, - of having a consolidated OSC for all OSC personnel on the second level
- of the Service Building. It was expected that a decision would be
l- made prior to the 1987 exercise as to whether the OSC would remain
i* a split:rather than a consolidated ERF. The ins)ector noted that
OSC telephones and status boards were stored wit 1in'or in the hallway
i outside the two Service Building offices that would be utilized as
- OSC workspace.
The nearsite E0F was located as described in the Zion Annex to
-
the GSEP. The.E0F was essentially a dedicated workspace, although
- portions of the facility were infrequently used for meetings.
However, the licensee soon planned to implement Revision 6 to the
'
! emergency plan, which included a restructured E0F organization. This
,
would necessitate some rearrangement of E0F workstations, including
n - related telephones and computer equipment. While the GSEP Coordinator
was able to show the inspector a revised E0F internal layout, actual
work on rearranging the workstations had not begun. The licensee'also
i planned to have other refinements, such as electronic status boards,
installed and fully operational by May 1987.
L
Controlled documents stored in the E0F included: The IPRA; Zion
.
- Volume V to the IPRA; the Wisconsin Emergency Plan; Zion Technical
! Specifications; Station, EOF, and Corporate Command Center EPIPs;
- Systems Operations Instructions; an Offsite Dose Calculation Manual;
L and ED'and EG-series procedures. Central files staff maintained
'
such controlled documents, while the GSEP Coordinator was responsible
. for maintaining office supplies.
The licensee was in the process of moving the Joint Public Information
i
Center (JPIC) from the second floor of the E0F building to a building
in Highland Park, Illinois. A cognizant member of the licensee's
!
corporate staff indicated that the new facility was scheduled to be
ready for use by May 1, 1987. The inspector was told that internal
>
and external construction work was well underway.
!
!
~
! 7
.
y . . - - ,-.y -- + , , .,,._4, _
,_m,------,m,vm--,-.--.y. . . , m. , ....#m_,--,,--r. - , _ - y-e,r_em,__r-m,,. ,-,__,.r, m.~7...,-,v.. ,y_.
,
n -
+
,
,
. . . . .
.
~By correspondence dated December 5, 1986, the licensee formally
- requested Commission approval to change the location of its '
- Backup E0F for only.the Zion Station from the present facility in.
Libert
'
l(CCC)inyville, downtownIllinois to the existing
Chicago. Corporate:
The States Command
of Illinois'and Center-
Wisconsin -
- have formally agreed to this proposed change,.which has also been
supported by regional staff. As of mid-February, the Commission had..
not issued a decision on the. acceptability of changing the-Backup
E0F's; location.
-The inspectors reviewed-the inventory records and. inspected.the
-
-
contents of the "GSEP Van" utilized by field survey teams and the-
OSC's' supply cabinet. All: inventories had been performed per-
. procedural requirements. However, the inspectors.noted several
discrepancies in the GSEP Van's contents. A fuel' storage container
-
inside the van was low on fuel and was not secured within the vehicle.
Respirators stored in the van and.in extra ." environs team" kits had
no identifications.as to.last date of inspection to better ensure
they-were still usable. Several~small ladders were lying unsecured
on the floor. of the van. Although the van and environs kits included
multiple survey instruments and detectors, there was only one
radiological-instrument cable in-the van and in each kit. Finally,-
the~ current inventory record was not available inside the kits.
Based on the above findings, this portion.of the licensee's
)rogram is-acceptable; however, the following items should
)e considered for improvement:
- The-licensee's corporate and Station staffs should keep
Region III emerger,1cy, preparedness staff informed on progress
being made on modifying or relocating onsite and offsite ERFs
prior to the 1987 exercise. Station staff should also keep
Region III emergency preparedness staff informed of longer
range plans and schedules for building a new TSC.
- Fuel containers and ladders stored in the GSEP Van should be
securely attached to the vehicle.
P
- The van and environs kits should be equipped with more than
one radiological instrument cable and a copy of the current
inventory record.
.
- - Respirators stored in the van and environs kits should
have their latest date(s) of inspection available at their
- storage locations.
. c. Organization and Management Control
I-
.At the time of this inspection, the Station's GSEP Coordinator
,
reported to the Services Superintendent through the Regulatory
'
Assurance Supervisor. However, the coordinator expected that,-
.
prior to July 1987, his reporting chain to the Services
l Superintendent would become the Rad Chem Supervisor, followed by
-
t 8
. . -.-.-.-_ .-. - -.
- -.
.
.
4 y
-
,e .
v _
_the Assistant Superintendent forLTechnical Services. During.the.
11ast 12 to 18 months,.the coordinator had also been designated as
the' Human Performance Evaluation System (HPES) Coordinator and the
- Station Goals Coordinator.- However, another. individual had been.
- assigned as the full-time HPES Coordinator in early 1987. The GSEP
Coordinator understood that his-goals coordinator duties would also
be reassigned sometime in the Spring 1987. 'Thus, the GSEP Coordinator
position was in the process of becoming more of a full-time duty
versus the trend over-the previous 12 to 18 months.
- Although the GSEP Coordinator was a Station employee, he was
also responsible to the corporate Supervisor of Emergency Planning .
through a corporate Emergency Planning Supervisor. Beginning in the
first quarter of 1986,-this-Emergency Planning Supervisor had assigned
a member of the corporate emergency planning staff to conduct
- quarterly reviews of the GSEP Coordinator's activities. -This practice
had also been established at the licensee's other nuclear stations.
It was intended to ensure that the coordinators were performing
all required tasks and to enhance ~ the working relationships between
. corporate and Station. emergency planning staffs. The quarterly
reviews were essentially announced 1-day visits with the Station's
GSEP Coordinator to cover a pre-arranged agenda. These visits were
' correctly not being viewed as independent audits of the program.
Results of these visits were adequately documented, and had been
forwarded to Station management and to corporate emergency
planning supervisors.
The-inspector also reviewed the minutes of 1986 quarterly GSEP
Coordinator counterpart meetings and the schedule for the.1987
quarterly meetings. Topics covered at such meetings included:
results of.recent NRC. inspections, Quality Assurance audits, and
.INP0 evaluations of emergency preparedness; scheduling of drills
-
. involving corporate staff; current offsite emergency. planning
issues; status of development of Revision 6 to the GSEP; development
of the GSEP Surveillance Program to improve the standardization of
the coordinators' activities and emergency planning initiatives
begun at the various Stations;.
A review of Letters of Agreement was conducted by the inspector.
Agreement letters signed by local off-site agencies were on file
at the Station. Copies of signed letters from technical support
organizations with contracts to provide emergency services to any
of the licensee's Stations were also available onsite. All letters
were current and identified the services to be provided.
Based on the above findings, this portion of the licensee's program
is acceptable.
d. Training
The inspectors conducted interviews with the following members
of the onsite emergency organization in order to assess their
understandings of their emergency response roles: two Shift
.
9
.-
_. _-
.
.
Foremen-(SF), two SCREs, one Rad Chem Director, two Maintenance /
OSC Directors, one Technical Director, three Communications
Directors, one Administrative Director, and one Stores Director.
The SF/SCRE walkthroughs were conducted with separate teams of
personnel, each team consisting of a SF and a SCRE. These
walkthroughs focused on emergency detection and classification;
protective action decisionmaking; and initial offsite notification
requirements. As persons in the line of succession to the Shift
Engineer (SE) as Acting Station Director, both the SF and.SCRE
would perform the aforementioned Acting Station Director
responsibilities-in the absence or incapacitation of the SE, or could
assist the SE in the performance of these duties. The questioning
involved actual use of the Nuclear Accident Reporting System (NARS)
and National Warning System (NAWAS) communications equipment in
addition to having personnel complete a NARS form. The interviewees
demonstrated an adequate familiarity and understanding of procedural
guidance in all areas of questioning. However, both teams of
personnel, and a Rad Chem Director who was interviewed separately,
exhibited some unfamiliarity with computer equipment utilized to
obtain real-time, onsite meteorological data.- Several persons
also exhibited uncertainty when asked to interpret the wind
direction data they had acquired.
In general, all the other interviewees were adequately aware of
their emergency duties and responsibilities. However, when asked
how they would obtain additional communicators for the TSC, each of
the three Communications Directors indicated that he would either
request that another Communications Director be summoned or would
request an available person from the OSC staff. The availability
of additional communicators to man dedicated communications equipment
in the TSC is further discussed in Paragraph 9 of this report.
Both OSC Directors displayed an adequate overall understanding of
their duties, despite the fact that they were provided with minimal
procedural guidance. Although the GSEP contained an extensive list
of duties and responsibilities for the OSC Director position, the
primary procedural guidance for this director was a few statements
in the facility activation procedure (EPIP 410-1), which essentially
instructed the director to report to the OSC, manage the facility,
and maintain communications with the CR and TSC. The inspector
concluded that the interviewees' knowledge of their emergency duties
was based more on previous training experiences than on the scant
procedural guidance available to them during a facility activation.
The inspectors noted that procedural guidance available to Technical
and Operations Directors also did not reflect all the responsibilities
contained in the GSEP, although guidance for both positions was in
position-specific EPIPs and was more complete compared to that
available to the OSC Director. The licensee must revise a
EPIPs so that procedural guidance for the OSC, Technical, and ppropriate
Operations Directors reflects all their duties and responsibilities,
as summarized in the GSEP. This is an Open Item. (295/87002-01 and
304/87002-02)
10
. . _
._ _
_ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ ._
m .
, .
y ,. .
,:
ipt
m-
'
'In addition to the open item, the following item should'be
-
considered for improvement:
'*- -CR personnel and Rad Chem Directors, who may'have to acquire
real-time,.o'nsite meteorological data during an emergency plan-
activation should receive ' additional familiarization training
~
-on the computer equipment used.to obtain the data and on the
interpretation of these data.
, e. Independent Reviews / Audits (also 82210)~
The annual independent review of the program was adequately done
'in 1986.. Quality Assurance-(QA) staff based at Zion performed the
"onsite" annual audit, while QA personnel based at other locations
. performed the "offsite" annual audit, which addressed emergency
.
preparedness. The two audits satisfied the requirements of
.10 CFR 50.54(t), including addressing the adequacy of the licensee's
interface with offsite support organizations. No deficiencies
requiring a formal response were identified in either audit.
The licensee described the mechanism-for supplying relevant audit
information during the December 1986 meeting with offsite support
agencies. The results of the audits were adequately documented
and given to'both plant and corporate management. According to
)rocedure' ZAP 6-52-2, the audit reports will be filed for one year
)y QA before being stored permanently in microform.
Besides the annual audit, station-based QA staff did a number of
surveillances of.the program since the last inspection.
.Surveillances addressed: both July 1986 off-hours augmentation
drills; the' January 1987 off-hours augmentation drill; the-
May 1986 emergency plan activation and the November 1986
, environmental monitoring drill. Allsurveillanceswereadequately
3 documented. Followups on deficiencies were done in a timely manner.
- The findings were not' considered " closed" until the corrective
i action had been verified as being completed. For example, the
L QA finding on the November drill was not closed out until the
l missing markers for several offsite monitoring-locations had been
! replaced, as physically verified by QA staff. The QA plans for 1987
included four surveillances of drills and tests; an audit of the
- exercise; the annual audit; plus surveillances of GSEP activations.
4
i Although the audits of the program were adequate, some audit
l questions lacked the depth found in the surveillance program. For
example, more than ten audit questions dealt with various equipment
. checks and supplies inventories. However, the auditors typically
l addressed these checklist questions by referencing records, rather
F than by also occasionally verifying the accuracy of a current
t
inventory record. One checklist question dealt with the annual
- issuance of emergency information brochures. However, rather than
!- referencing distribution records or spot-checking local brochure
l
l
!
'
11
i
.
.
deliveries versus those records, the auditor's res)onse to the
checklist question essentially restated the distri)ution
requirement, with a general reference as to when the latest
distribution was to have occurred.
-The inspector discussed the corrective action program with the GSEP
Coordinator and reviewed relevant records. The coordinator had the
majorresponsibilityfordecidingwhichitemsidentifiedduring
drill or exercise critiques would be acted upon. He maintained
an informal tracking system for documenting what actions had been
initiated by himself, other Station staff, or by corporate staff.
However, based on a review of tracking system records associated
with 1986 drills and the exercise the inspector concluded that the
tracking, system was not always effectively utilized. While some
records indicated both the actions initiated and their completion
status, other records indicated only the actions requested of
another work group, such as the Rad Chem Department revising a
procedure. The coordinator could not say for certain whether or
not such requested actions had been completed. While the tracking
system had been effectivel
during the 1986 exercise, they coordinator
utilized for could
itemsnot
identified
produceby the NRC
tracking
system records related to the " items worthy of followup" that had
been identified in the licensee's self-critique report on that
exercise. Most of these self-critique items were, however,
analogous to those. identified in the NRCs inspection report.
The GSEP Coordinator had performed an evaluation of the 1986 emergency
)lan activation records with the aid of a non proceduralized checklist.
iis evaluation of the February 1987 Unusual Event was incomplete, as
the associated NARS forms had apparently been misplaced onsite. The
checklist had been simplified from that seen during previous
inspections. However, it was an adequate aid for documenting the
evaluation of records associated with Unusual Event declarations.
Based on the above findings, this portion of the licensee's program
is acceptable; however, the following items should be considered
for improvement:
- During annual audits of the program, more emphasis should
be placed on physically verifying the accuracy of certain
inventory records, rather than primarily relying on reviews
of the records themselves.
- The completeness and currency of the GSEP Coordinator's
corrective action tracking system should be more closely
monitored by QA staff or by corporate emergency planning
staff.
12
. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ ______
.
.
5. Emergency Detection and Classification (82201)
By correspondence dated October 23 1986, the licensee formall
a proposed revision to the Station,s Emergency Action Levels EALs) and (y submitted a
su) porting "PWR EAL Philosophy" document. Regional staff viewed this
su)mittal as more than a reformatting and standardization effort on the
part of the licensee. Instead, the staff considered the submittal as a
majorrewriteoftheEALs,whichwouldalsoaddressNRCconcernson
certain EALs which had been expressed as open or improvement items in
various emergency preparedness inspection reports since 1984. Regional
staff responded to the submittal by letter dated January 12, 1987. Since
that time the staff has discussed its concerns on some of the proposed
EAls with the licensee's corporate emergency planning staff. The .
licensee's corporate and Station staffs discussed res)onses to the NRC
concerns prior to a meeting with the inspectors on Fe)ruary 27, 1987.
The licensee indicated that it would formally respond to the staff's
EAL concerns in March 1987.
Based on the above findings, this portion of the licensee's program
is acceptable.
6. Protective Action Decisionmaking (82202)
The inspectors determined that procedural guidance on onsite and offsite
)rotective action decisionmaking was in conformance with that in
Revision 5/5A of the GSEP. As indicated in Paragraph 4 of this report,
the licensee has provided the staff with a proposed Revision 6A to the
GSEP with the intent of resolving the staff s concern regarding the use
of evacuation time estimates in the decisionmaking process. Revision 6A
is currently under staff review.
Based on the above findings, this portion of the licensee's program
is acceptable.
7. Notifications and Communications (82203)
All of the monthly, quarterly, and annual communications tests that were
required since the previous routine inspection have been done. With two
exceptions discussed below, the communications equipment all tested out
adequately or, in those few cases where there was an equipment failure,
the equipment was repaired in a timely manner and suffered no recurrence.
The first exception was the NARS phone in the Kenosha County Sheriff's
office. In May and June of 1986 and also in the three month period
ending in February 1987, the NARS phone was discovered to be inoperable
during the monthly communications tests. Illinois ESDA, who is responsible
was notified after each failure and had the phone
for the NARS
repaired. system,in three of the five cases, the NARS phone was reported
However,
failed again when the next monthly test was performed. Communications with
the sheriff's office were then adequately demonstrated using commercial
phones. The second exception was an extension in the E0F. This phone
13
.-
e
.
failed in the annual communication drill in 1986, was repaired and failed
again in mid-1986, was repaired and failed again in the 1987 annual drill.
However, repairs subsequent to the drill in February 1987 were expected
to be permanent.
The final monthly testing of the old Health Physics Network (HPN)
telephones was in August 1986. The new commercial HPN phones became
o)erational in September 1986 and have been tested monthly ever since.
TierehavebeennoproblemswIththenewHPNphoneslocatedintheTSC
and E0F.
The ins)ectcr's review of the phone tests included the NARS phone in the
Backup EOF, located in the basement of the Lake County Sheriff's office.
The Lake County Sheriff Office also has a NARS phone. The inspection
revealed that the NARS phone in the Backup E0F was only tested annually,
whereas other NARS phones have been tested monthly. The reason for the
relatively infrequent testing of the Backup E0F's NARS phone was that
the Backup EOF was normally locked and no one would be present to answer
the phone.
Regarding backup communications capabilities in the event of loss of
normal power to telephone equipment, a battery-backup radio was available
in the CR for communications with the Load Dispatcher. Some plant
telephones would remain operable during a power failure, although they
would not " ring" to announce incoming calls. Microwave (grey) phones
onsite would still connect the Station to the Corporate Command Center
and E0F. In addition, there were other trunk lines in the nearsite EOF.
The licensee stated that there were also sufficient walkie-talkie radios
available onsite which could be taken to the E0F to maintain communications
capabilities with persons in that facility in the event of a failure of
primary communications equipment.
The annual communications drill was held in February 1987. This drill
was organized by the corporate emergency planning staff. Although the
documented, formal critique was not available onsite, the licensee stated
that all equipment performed satisfactorily on the day of the test except
for the E0F base station radio, the yellow phone in the TSC, and one
extension in the E0F. The licensee indicated that repairs had already
been completed on all three problems. The annual communications drill
included the verbal transmission of data from a NARS form, with
instructions to mail the completed forms to corporate. When the
documented critique of the annual communications drill is issued, it
will include a review of the accuracy of the NARS forms that were
filled out by the various respondents.
Based on the above findings, this portion of the licensee's program
is acceptable; however, the following item should be considered
for improvement:
- The NARS phone in the Backup E0F should be tested more frequently
than annually.
14
.
.
8. Changes to the Emergency Preparedness Program (82204)
Changes to the Station's program have been described in Paragraphs 4,
5, 6, and 9 of this report.
Based on the above findings, this portion of the licensee's program
is acceptable.
9. ShiftStaffingandAugmentation(82205)
The numbers and ty)es of personnel required for shift staffing and
augmentation met tie criteria of Table 8-1 of NUREG-0654, Revision 1.
Figure 4.2-3 of the GSEP had the augmentation provisions for the
emergency organization. Augmentation drills have been performed
semiannually, in accordance with EPIP 320-1, " Activation of the GSEP
Station Group". This arocedure had a callout matrix consistent with the
referenced Figure in t1e GSEP. This procedure was also the reference
document for the "GSEP Callout Checklist", which was an informal
single page, prioritized listing of GSEP position titles and names and
phone numbers /pager numbers that was used by Security when performing a
Station Group callout. The callout list was doubly prioritized, first by
category (withthetechnicaldirectorsbeinghigheronthelistversus
non-technical personnel) and then by travel times to the site for persons
in each category.
The inspector reviewed records of the augmentation drills performed since
the previous routine inspection. An inadequate augmentation drill was
performed on July 2, 1986, followed by a satisfactory remedial drill on
July 16, 1986. The latest augmentation drill was January 28, 1987. The
two recent augmentation drills demonstrated an adequate capability for
staff augmentation during an emergency in that the time from the beginning
of the drill to the estimated time of arrival of the necessary personnel
l was 67 minutes for the drill on July 2, 1986 and 61 minutes for the drill
on January 28, 1987.
The July 2 augmentation drill was properly evaluated as having failed by
the two QA staff members who observed the drill. The reason was that the
security officer used an out-of-date Callout Checklist. This resulted in
Security getting an affirmative reply and a estimated time of arrival for
the Communications Director position from a man who was no longer
assigned to that position. The QA auditors informed Security that an
out-of-date checklist had been used. flowever, when the filled-out GSEP
Callout Checklist was delivered to the GSEP Coordinator, it was the
current checklist, and the Communication Director whose name was checked
off was a scheduled director, contrary to the observation of the two QA
auditors during the drill and contrary to the recollection of the
Communication Director whose name was on the current checklist as the
person who had been contacted. The corrective action taken inclued a
remedial augmentation drill on July 16 which was successful.
I
15
l
F
'
.
.
Quarterly updates to the phone numbers in EPIP 320-1, and hence to the
informal GSEP Callout Checklist, were done in a timely manner by the
GSEP Coordinator, who persoaally checked with each person on the list
to ensure that the phone numbers were current. The present version of
EPIP 320-1 allowed for mid quarter updates to the Callout Checklist used
by Security. The GSEP Coordinator would perform mid quarter updates as
he becomes aware of personnel changes. However, there is no mechanism in
place to alert the Coordinator of any personnel changes which would
require a mid quarter change to the checklist.
The pool of personnel listed in the above documents who can fill the
various emergency response positions was too small to ensure that all
Station Group director positions can be filled on an around-the-clock
basis during a prolonged activation. Each position did not have three
qualified individuals. Only two individuals were listed for the Environs
Director positions. In the combined category of
Director and Director
" Maintenance Security /0SC Director", there were only four names listed.
Since both positions would likely be staffed in a prolonged Station Group
activation, a pool of four persons is insufficient to ensure adequate,
long-term coverage.
The licensee must ensure that there are at least three qualified personnel
for each Station Group director position. Also, for the consolidated
Maintenance /0SC Director position more than four individuals must be
identified,asbothpositionswouldlikelyremainactivatedsimultaneously
during a prolonged activation. This is an Open Item. (295/87002-02and
304/87002-03)
The callout procedure did not identify personnel who would be used as
supplemental TSC communicators under the direction of the Communications
Director, or as status board plotters / administrative aids under the
direction of the Administrative Director. Based on discussions with the
GSEP Coordinator and observations during annual exercises, the inspectors
concluded that the licensee had definite personnel in mind to fill these
positions during exercise situations. For example, licensed personnel
from the Training Department would be supplementary TSC communicators.
The licensee must establish procedural provisions for the callout of
trained communicators, status board plotters, and clerical support
personnel to assist the Station Group. This is an Open Item.
295/87002-03 and 304/87002-04)
In addition to the open items, the following items should be considered
for improvement:
- Future off-hours augmentation drills should continue to be monitored
by QA staff and/or the GSEP Coordinator.
- An administrative mechanism should be established for informing
the GSEP Coordinator of changes to Jersonnel assignment, training
status, or contact information whic1 may warrant revision to the
Station Group's callout provisions.
16
-.
.
10. Knowledge and Performance of Duties (Training) (82206)
In addition to the walkthroughs described in Paragraph 4d of this report,
the inspectors reviewed records associated with the Station's emergency
preparedness training program. In some cases, 1986 training consisted of
classroom sessions. However, training for the majority of persons having
key roles in the onsite emergency organization consisted of structured
reading assignments for each position followed by a proficiency
examination with a minimum passing score 70 percent. The examinations
were made up from an approved bank of questions. Each exam had been
proctored. In most cases, the corrected examinations had been reviewed
with the trainee to ensure correct answers and level of expected
performance were onderstood. However, this review was not documented
or even required by current policy.
No overall policy or guidance document was in effect to govern the GSEP
training, program. Such a document was in the process of being developed
as a training instruction and was reviewed in draft form by the inspectors.
This instruction was planned for implementation in March or April 1987.
Most of the forms, exam cover sheets and documentation used in GSEP
training had no authorizing or identifying markings or " prepared by"
information. This would be corrected upon issue of the policy document
with the forms and cover sheets included as enclosures to the policy.
A program review system was being used to assure program weaknesses were
being factored into the training program. This included weaknesses or
shortcomings that were identified through exercise or. exam performance.
This program review was included in the draft training instruction.
A review of training documentation showed all participants in the onsite
emergency organization were current in their continuing training. This
review was conducted using the completed reading assignment sheets and
the completed examinations. The computerized training tracking system
was not structured to provide personnel training status or to identify
incomplete training. The accuracy of records on the current status of
individuals' training was attributed to the conscientiousness of the
training instructor assigned to GESP training and rather than to the
computer system.
Medical emergency response training to Radiation Cheaistry Technicians
(RCTs) had been upgraded in early 1987. The licensee's medical services
contractor had conducted six, 1-day training sessions on the handling
andcareofcontaminated, injured,plantpersonnelsothatall36RCTs
could benefit from such training as opposed to the few RCTs who would
be involved in an annual medical, drill. Following a morning training
session dealing with the onsite aspects of handling an accident victim
the RCTs toured the local hospital facilities to which an accident victim
would be taken. The inspector understood that, although the local
ambulance service had been invited to participate in this extra training
effort, the service's employees did not attend any of these sessions.
17
. .
.-..
The inspector reviewed adequately detailed records of 1986 emergency
preparedness drills and the annual exercise. The inspector concluded
that all required drills, and an unannounced exercise, had been conducted
and critiqued during 1986. A 1987 drill schedule had been developed and
addressed all drill requirements.
An annual meeting for the Zion Station's offsite support agencies was
held in December 1986. The agenda included a discussion of example EALs
'and a discussion on how persons could obtain information on internal
audit results relative to the interface with offsite support agencies.
Based on the above findings, this portion of the licensee's program
is acceptable; however, the following item should be considered
for improvement:
The com)uterized system utilized to record persons' training records
should )e modified to enable a user to readily identify individuals
<
who will shortly require some requalification training.
11. Unresolved Item
Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required
or
'
in order to ascertain
deviations. whether
An unresolved they
item are acceptable,
identified during this violations,
inspect ion is
discussed in Paragraph 3.
12. Exit Interview
On February 27, 1987, the inspectors met with those licensee
representatives identified in Paragraph 1 to present their
preliminary inspection findings. The licensee agreed to consider
the items discussed and did not indicate that any of the information
was proprietary in nature.
)
I
I
(
18
-. -- _ - . - - - - - - - ._ - .-_ - _ - __-_-. - - - - .- - .-