IR 05000295/1997004
| ML20136E047 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zion File:ZionSolutions icon.png |
| Issue date: | 03/06/1997 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20136E009 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-295-97-04, 50-295-97-4, 50-304-97-04, 50-304-97-4, NUDOCS 9703130097 | |
| Download: ML20136E047 (2) | |
Text
.. - -
- -..
..
-.
.
..
.. - -
...
..
-.
~
- - _ -. - -. -... -
-
'
.I
,
,
..
.'*
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i
REGION III
Docket Nos:
50-295; 50-304 Licenses No:
,
Reports No:
50-295/97004(DRS); 50-304/97004(DRS)
.
l Licensee:
Commonwealth Edison Company Facility:
Zion Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Location:
101 Shiloh Blvd.
Zion, IL 60099 Dates:
February 3-7, 1997 i
Inspector:
J. L. Belanger, Senior Physical Security q
Inspector Approved by:
James R. Creed, Chief, Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety
$3$"
9703130097 970306 PDR ADOCK 05000295
G PDR Upon a
,
trolled
-
.--
.
.-
.. - -
-
-
..
_.
.. -
I i.
'
.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I
Zion Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 NRC Inspection Reports 50-295/97004; 50-304/97004 This was a routine, announced, security inspection covering the areas of Vital l
Area Access Control of Personnel and Vehicles; Alarm Stations and Communications; Testing, Maintenance and Compensatory Measures; Security i
Organization, and Followup on Previous Inspection Findings.
Overall, the security program was adequate to protect public health and safety.
No violations of HRC requirements were identified.
The conduct of security operations was good, with continued e
improvements in the organization's professionalism and
.
connunications.
(Section S6.2),
Security contract staff shortages in the nuclear security officer e
and access control inspector positions were eliminated, resulting in a reduction in the use of overtime and an increase in tactical j
response drills conducted.
(Sections 8.1)
i Station and corporate maintenance support for the security system e
!
was a strength.
(Section S2.1)
{
Generally, contract security force performance was good.
e Personnel errors were few and moderate in significance.
(Section
l SS.1)
A review of security related problem identification forms (PIF)
e
,'
!
indicated a continuing need to promote worker personal accountability in the areas of badge control and vital area door control.
(Section S5.2)
Good corporate support, in the form of guidance and personnel
assistance, continued.
- A security drill to evaluate performance in the conduct of warehouse package searches showed a lack of worker understanding of basic expectations.
(Section S5.3)
Enclosure C
ton This Is Decontrolled 2