Similar Documents at Zion |
---|
Category:INSPECTION REPORT
MONTHYEARIR 05000295/19990031999-09-0101 September 1999 Insp Repts 50-295/99-03 & 50-304/99-03 on 990608-0812.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Facility & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19990021999-06-18018 June 1999 Insp Repts 50-295/99-02 & 50-304/99-02 on 990121-0608.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Facility Management & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19980101998-11-0303 November 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-10 & 50-304/98-10 on 980814-1008.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Facility Mgt & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19980091998-09-0808 September 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-09 & 50-304/98-09 on 980626-0813.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Facility Mgt & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19980071998-06-26026 June 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-07 & 50-304/98-07 on 980425-0609.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19980061998-04-23023 April 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-06 & 50-304/98-06 on 980330-0403.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000295/19980041998-03-31031 March 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-04 & 50-304/98-04 on 980203-0313.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19980021998-03-0606 March 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-02 & 50-304/98-02 on 980112-0219.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support ML20203H8841998-02-25025 February 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-32 & 50-304/97-32 on 971217-980202. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Engineering & Plant Support ML20202D7441998-02-0606 February 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-03 & 50-304/98-03 on 980120-23. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Performance & Specifically,Evaluation of Effectiveness of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000295/19970271998-01-30030 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-27 & 50-304/97-27 on 971117-25.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensed Reactor Operator & Senior Reactor Operator Requalification Training Programs ML20199G3461998-01-27027 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-23 & 50-304/97-23 on 970908-1216. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering ML20199A2461998-01-21021 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-25 & 50-304/97-25 on 971011-1216. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19970291998-01-0909 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-29 & 50-304/97-29 on 971202-05.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance During Plant Biennial Exercise of Emergency Plan IR 05000295/19970211997-12-0909 December 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-21 & 50-304/97-21 on 970602-0919.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Developed Phoenix Training Program as Part of Station Restart Action Plan IR 05000295/19970261997-12-0505 December 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-26 & 50-304/97-26 on 971027-31. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support, Performance & Evaluated Effectiveness of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000295/19970311997-12-0404 December 1997 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Repts 50-295/97-31 & 50-304/97-31 on 971201.Violations Noted.Major Areas Discussed:Violations Involving Failures to Adequately Implement fitness-for-duty Program Requirements ML20202D9401997-11-28028 November 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-22 & 50-304/97-22 on 970830-1010. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19970171997-10-10010 October 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-17 & 50-304/97-17 on 970619-0922.No Violations Noted But pre-decisional Enforcement Conference Will Be Scheduled to Discuss Violations Cited.Major Areas inspected:fitness-for-duty Related Events IR 05000295/19970181997-10-0202 October 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-18 & 50-304/97-18 on 970409-0730. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering IR 05000295/19970191997-09-30030 September 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-19 & 50-304/97-19 on 970719-0829. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000295/19970161997-08-28028 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-16 & 50-304/97-16 on 970530-0718. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance & Engineering IR 05000295/19970201997-08-26026 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-20 & 50-304/97-20 on 970728-0801. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Plant Support Performance & Specifically,An Evaluation of Effectiveness of RP Program IR 05000295/19970131997-08-15015 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-13 & 50-304/97-13 on 970404-0529. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support Re Failure to Immediately Notify CR of Fire in Unit 1 Containment Resulting in Violation ML20149G6381997-07-17017 July 1997 Insp Rept 50-295/97-12 on 970311-0425.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering Associated W/Unit 1 Loss of Offsite Power Event That Occurred on 970311 ML20149H9961997-07-16016 July 1997 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Rept on 970703.Areas Discussed:Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-295/97-02, 50-304/97-02,50-295/97-07 & 50-304/97-07 on 970206-0402 & 0312-0428 & Corrective Actions IR 05000295/19970151997-06-26026 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-15 & 50-304/97-15 on 970602-06.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Plant Support Performance & Effectiveness of RP Program ML20140G8291997-06-0404 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-02 & 50-304/97-02 on 970206-0402. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19970141997-05-30030 May 1997 Partially Withheld NRC Security Insp Repts 50-295/97-14 & 50-304/97-14 on 970428-0502 (Ref 10CFR73.21(c)(2). No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Physical Security Program IR 05000295/19970071997-05-21021 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-07 & 50-304/97-07 on 970312-0428. Violations Noted.Major Areas inspected:follow-up on 970225-0307,AIT Insp of Improper Control Rod Manipulation Event ML20148B7831997-05-0606 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-09 & 50-304/97-09 on 970324-0414. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Radiation Protection Program IR 05000295/19970081997-04-30030 April 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-08 & 50-304/97-08 on 970317-21. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Insp Included Review of EP Program,Aspect of Plant Support IR 05000295/19960021997-04-0101 April 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-02 & 50-304/96-02 on 961203-970122.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Discussed:Shipment of Radioactive Matls Exceeding Limits of 49CFR173.425 & Inadequately Training Personnel IAW Procedure ML20137J6871997-03-24024 March 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-20 & 50-304/96-20 on 961207-970205. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000295/19970041997-03-0606 March 1997 Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-295/97-04 & 50-304/97-04 on 970203-07.No Violations Noted.Details Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20134P4881997-02-11011 February 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-21 & 50-304/96-21 on 961203-970122. Apparent Violations Being Considered for Escalated Enforcement Action.Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Protection & Chemistry Controls IR 05000295/19960171997-02-0303 February 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-17 & 50-304/96-17 on 961012-1206. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations, Maint & Engineering ML20134G0481997-01-28028 January 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-14 & 50-304/96-14 on 960824-1011. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance & Engineering IR 05000295/19960131996-12-23023 December 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-13 & 50-304/96-13 on 961001-03,28-30 & 1107.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint. Observed & Reviewed ISI Procedures,Personnel Certifications IR 05000295/19960181996-12-0202 December 1996 Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-295/96-18 & 50-304/96-18 on 961028-1101 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Corrective Actions,Mgt Support,Effectiveness of Mgt Controls & Security Program Plans ML20135B6851996-11-27027 November 1996 Predecisonal Enforcement Conference Repts 50-295/96-11 & 50-304/96-11 on 961112.No Violations Noted.Areas Discussed: Apparent Violations Identified During 960722-0822 Insp Along W/Corrective Actions Taken or Planned by Licensee IR 05000295/19960161996-11-21021 November 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-16 & 50-304/96-16 on 960923-1024. Violations Noted.Major Areas Insp:Radiation Protection Program ML20129E3401996-10-22022 October 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-11 & 50-304/96-11 on 960722-0822. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Team Insp of Engineering & Technical Support ML20129F1121996-10-22022 October 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-10 & 50-304/96-10 on 960713-0829. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering,Plant Support & Security ML20129F0761996-09-16016 September 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-08 & 50-304/96-08 on 960608-0726. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19930241994-01-27027 January 1994 Insp Repts 50-295/93-24 & 50-304/93-24 on 940110-14.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Rp Program,Review of Organizational Changes,Audits & Appraisals & External Exposure Controls IR 05000295/19930231994-01-14014 January 1994 Insp Repts 50-295/93-23 & 50-304/93-23 on 931124-940106. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Outage Activities, Events,Operational Safety,Maintenance & Surveillance IR 05000295/19930181993-12-14014 December 1993 Insp Repts 50-295/93-18 & 50-304/93-18 on 931004-29.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering & Technical Support & Related Mgt Activities ML20058H2611993-12-0707 December 1993 Insp Repts 50-295/93-20 & 50-304/93-20 on 931112-1123. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Resident Insp of Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings,Summary of Outage Activities & Operational Safety Verification IR 05000295/19930211993-12-0101 December 1993 Insp Repts 50-295/93-21 & 50-304/93-21 on 931115-19.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Rp Program,Review of Surveys & Contamination Control 1999-09-01
[Table view] Category:NRC-GENERATED
MONTHYEARIR 05000295/19990031999-09-0101 September 1999 Insp Repts 50-295/99-03 & 50-304/99-03 on 990608-0812.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Facility & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19990021999-06-18018 June 1999 Insp Repts 50-295/99-02 & 50-304/99-02 on 990121-0608.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Facility Management & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19980101998-11-0303 November 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-10 & 50-304/98-10 on 980814-1008.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Facility Mgt & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19980091998-09-0808 September 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-09 & 50-304/98-09 on 980626-0813.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Facility Mgt & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19980071998-06-26026 June 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-07 & 50-304/98-07 on 980425-0609.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19980061998-04-23023 April 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-06 & 50-304/98-06 on 980330-0403.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000295/19980041998-03-31031 March 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-04 & 50-304/98-04 on 980203-0313.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19980021998-03-0606 March 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-02 & 50-304/98-02 on 980112-0219.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support ML20203H8841998-02-25025 February 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-32 & 50-304/97-32 on 971217-980202. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Engineering & Plant Support ML20202D7441998-02-0606 February 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-03 & 50-304/98-03 on 980120-23. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Performance & Specifically,Evaluation of Effectiveness of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000295/19970271998-01-30030 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-27 & 50-304/97-27 on 971117-25.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensed Reactor Operator & Senior Reactor Operator Requalification Training Programs ML20199G3461998-01-27027 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-23 & 50-304/97-23 on 970908-1216. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering ML20199A2461998-01-21021 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-25 & 50-304/97-25 on 971011-1216. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19970291998-01-0909 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-29 & 50-304/97-29 on 971202-05.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance During Plant Biennial Exercise of Emergency Plan IR 05000295/19970211997-12-0909 December 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-21 & 50-304/97-21 on 970602-0919.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Developed Phoenix Training Program as Part of Station Restart Action Plan IR 05000295/19970261997-12-0505 December 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-26 & 50-304/97-26 on 971027-31. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support, Performance & Evaluated Effectiveness of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000295/19970311997-12-0404 December 1997 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Repts 50-295/97-31 & 50-304/97-31 on 971201.Violations Noted.Major Areas Discussed:Violations Involving Failures to Adequately Implement fitness-for-duty Program Requirements ML20202D9401997-11-28028 November 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-22 & 50-304/97-22 on 970830-1010. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19970171997-10-10010 October 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-17 & 50-304/97-17 on 970619-0922.No Violations Noted But pre-decisional Enforcement Conference Will Be Scheduled to Discuss Violations Cited.Major Areas inspected:fitness-for-duty Related Events IR 05000295/19970181997-10-0202 October 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-18 & 50-304/97-18 on 970409-0730. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering IR 05000295/19970191997-09-30030 September 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-19 & 50-304/97-19 on 970719-0829. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000295/19970161997-08-28028 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-16 & 50-304/97-16 on 970530-0718. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance & Engineering IR 05000295/19970201997-08-26026 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-20 & 50-304/97-20 on 970728-0801. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Plant Support Performance & Specifically,An Evaluation of Effectiveness of RP Program IR 05000295/19970131997-08-15015 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-13 & 50-304/97-13 on 970404-0529. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support Re Failure to Immediately Notify CR of Fire in Unit 1 Containment Resulting in Violation ML20149G6381997-07-17017 July 1997 Insp Rept 50-295/97-12 on 970311-0425.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering Associated W/Unit 1 Loss of Offsite Power Event That Occurred on 970311 ML20149H9961997-07-16016 July 1997 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Rept on 970703.Areas Discussed:Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-295/97-02, 50-304/97-02,50-295/97-07 & 50-304/97-07 on 970206-0402 & 0312-0428 & Corrective Actions IR 05000295/19970151997-06-26026 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-15 & 50-304/97-15 on 970602-06.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Plant Support Performance & Effectiveness of RP Program ML20140G8291997-06-0404 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-02 & 50-304/97-02 on 970206-0402. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19970141997-05-30030 May 1997 Partially Withheld NRC Security Insp Repts 50-295/97-14 & 50-304/97-14 on 970428-0502 (Ref 10CFR73.21(c)(2). No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Physical Security Program IR 05000295/19970071997-05-21021 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-07 & 50-304/97-07 on 970312-0428. Violations Noted.Major Areas inspected:follow-up on 970225-0307,AIT Insp of Improper Control Rod Manipulation Event ML20148B7831997-05-0606 May 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-09 & 50-304/97-09 on 970324-0414. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Radiation Protection Program IR 05000295/19970081997-04-30030 April 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-08 & 50-304/97-08 on 970317-21. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Insp Included Review of EP Program,Aspect of Plant Support IR 05000295/19960021997-04-0101 April 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-02 & 50-304/96-02 on 961203-970122.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Discussed:Shipment of Radioactive Matls Exceeding Limits of 49CFR173.425 & Inadequately Training Personnel IAW Procedure ML20137J6871997-03-24024 March 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-20 & 50-304/96-20 on 961207-970205. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000295/19970041997-03-0606 March 1997 Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-295/97-04 & 50-304/97-04 on 970203-07.No Violations Noted.Details Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20134P4881997-02-11011 February 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-21 & 50-304/96-21 on 961203-970122. Apparent Violations Being Considered for Escalated Enforcement Action.Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Protection & Chemistry Controls IR 05000295/19960171997-02-0303 February 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-17 & 50-304/96-17 on 961012-1206. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations, Maint & Engineering ML20134G0481997-01-28028 January 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/96-14 & 50-304/96-14 on 960824-1011. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance & Engineering IR 05000295/19960131996-12-23023 December 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-13 & 50-304/96-13 on 961001-03,28-30 & 1107.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint. Observed & Reviewed ISI Procedures,Personnel Certifications IR 05000295/19960181996-12-0202 December 1996 Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-295/96-18 & 50-304/96-18 on 961028-1101 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Corrective Actions,Mgt Support,Effectiveness of Mgt Controls & Security Program Plans ML20135B6851996-11-27027 November 1996 Predecisonal Enforcement Conference Repts 50-295/96-11 & 50-304/96-11 on 961112.No Violations Noted.Areas Discussed: Apparent Violations Identified During 960722-0822 Insp Along W/Corrective Actions Taken or Planned by Licensee IR 05000295/19960161996-11-21021 November 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-16 & 50-304/96-16 on 960923-1024. Violations Noted.Major Areas Insp:Radiation Protection Program ML20129E3401996-10-22022 October 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-11 & 50-304/96-11 on 960722-0822. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Team Insp of Engineering & Technical Support ML20129F1121996-10-22022 October 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-10 & 50-304/96-10 on 960713-0829. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering,Plant Support & Security ML20129F0761996-09-16016 September 1996 Insp Repts 50-295/96-08 & 50-304/96-08 on 960608-0726. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19930241994-01-27027 January 1994 Insp Repts 50-295/93-24 & 50-304/93-24 on 940110-14.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Rp Program,Review of Organizational Changes,Audits & Appraisals & External Exposure Controls IR 05000295/19930231994-01-14014 January 1994 Insp Repts 50-295/93-23 & 50-304/93-23 on 931124-940106. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Outage Activities, Events,Operational Safety,Maintenance & Surveillance IR 05000295/19930181993-12-14014 December 1993 Insp Repts 50-295/93-18 & 50-304/93-18 on 931004-29.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering & Technical Support & Related Mgt Activities ML20058H2611993-12-0707 December 1993 Insp Repts 50-295/93-20 & 50-304/93-20 on 931112-1123. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Resident Insp of Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings,Summary of Outage Activities & Operational Safety Verification IR 05000295/19930211993-12-0101 December 1993 Insp Repts 50-295/93-21 & 50-304/93-21 on 931115-19.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Rp Program,Review of Surveys & Contamination Control 1999-09-01
[Table view] Category:TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
MONTHYEARIR 05000295/19990031999-09-0101 September 1999 Insp Repts 50-295/99-03 & 50-304/99-03 on 990608-0812.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Facility & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety ML20210C3781999-07-20020 July 1999 Notice of Violation from Insp on 990318.Violations Noted: on 980224,individual Attempted to Enter Protected Area of Plant with Firearm.Search Equipment Operator Failed to Failed to Secure Item & Prevent Access ML20210C4301999-07-20020 July 1999 Notice of Violation from Investigation on 990318.Violation Noted:On 980224,recipient Caused Util to Be in Violation of Section 2.C.6 of Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48.Recipient Attempted to Enter Protected Area of Station with Handgun IR 05000295/19990021999-06-18018 June 1999 Insp Repts 50-295/99-02 & 50-304/99-02 on 990121-0608.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Facility Management & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety ML20205P2211999-04-0909 April 1999 Notice of Violation from Insp & Investigation Completed on 981112.Violation Noted:From Approx July,1997 to 980122,SGI Was Not Stored in Locked Storage Container While Unattended IR 05000295/19980101998-11-0303 November 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-10 & 50-304/98-10 on 980814-1008.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Facility Mgt & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19980091998-09-0808 September 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-09 & 50-304/98-09 on 980626-0813.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Facility Mgt & Control,Decommissioning Support Activities,Sf Safety & Radiological Safety IR 05000295/19980071998-06-26026 June 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-07 & 50-304/98-07 on 980425-0609.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support PNO-III-98-030, on 980517,armed Security Guard on Patrol in Owner Controlled Area Reported to Security Person Lying Near Road.Guard Subsequently Reported Being Shot.No Intruder Found.Guard Admitted Shooting Himself in Foot1998-05-18018 May 1998 PNO-III-98-030:on 980517,armed Security Guard on Patrol in Owner Controlled Area Reported to Security Person Lying Near Road.Guard Subsequently Reported Being Shot.No Intruder Found.Guard Admitted Shooting Himself in Foot IR 05000295/19980061998-04-23023 April 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-06 & 50-304/98-06 on 980330-0403.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000295/19980041998-03-31031 March 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-04 & 50-304/98-04 on 980203-0313.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19980021998-03-0606 March 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-02 & 50-304/98-02 on 980112-0219.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support ML20203H8841998-02-25025 February 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-32 & 50-304/97-32 on 971217-980202. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Engineering & Plant Support ML20203H8601998-02-25025 February 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 971217-980202.Violation Noted:Licensee Returned to Svc Valves 2FW0038 & 2FW0042 in Locked Position Instead of Locked Closed Position ML20202D7291998-02-0606 February 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970120-23.Violation Noted: on 980115,radiation Protection Technician Performed Calibration of Auxiliary Bldg Exit Personnel Contamination Monitor & Failed to Reset Monitor to Initial Setting ML20202D7441998-02-0606 February 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/98-03 & 50-304/98-03 on 980120-23. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Performance & Specifically,Evaluation of Effectiveness of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000295/19970271998-01-30030 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-27 & 50-304/97-27 on 971117-25.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensed Reactor Operator & Senior Reactor Operator Requalification Training Programs ML20199G3461998-01-27027 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-23 & 50-304/97-23 on 970908-1216. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering ML20199G3271998-01-27027 January 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970908-1216.Violation Noted:As of 970724,licensee Failed to Ensure That Training Provided to Selected Contractor Craft & Quality Control Insp Personnel Performing Raychem Splice Applications ML20199A2461998-01-21021 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-25 & 50-304/97-25 on 971011-1216. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 07100011/20120161998-01-21021 January 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 971011-1216.Violations Noted:Procedures Were Not Appropriate to Circumstances in Listed Instances PNO-III-98-006, on 980115,licensee Announced Permanent Shut Down of Station.Util Plans to Maintain Plant in Safstor Decommissioning Mode Until Approx 20141998-01-15015 January 1998 PNO-III-98-006:on 980115,licensee Announced Permanent Shut Down of Station.Util Plans to Maintain Plant in Safstor Decommissioning Mode Until Approx 2014 ML20198P5561998-01-15015 January 1998 Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $110,000.Violations Noted:Three FFD Trained Supervisors Failed to Require for-cause Test for Employee W/Smell of Alcohol in Protected Area ML20216D7411998-01-12012 January 1998 EN-98-002:on 980115,notice of Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $110,000 Issued to Licensee.Action Based on Severity Level III Problem Involving Implementation of fitness-for-duty Program at Zion Station IR 05000295/19970291998-01-0909 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-295/97-29 & 50-304/97-29 on 971202-05.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance During Plant Biennial Exercise of Emergency Plan IR 05000295/19970211997-12-0909 December 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-21 & 50-304/97-21 on 970602-0919.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Developed Phoenix Training Program as Part of Station Restart Action Plan ML20203E5111997-12-0505 December 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 971027-31.Violation Noted:On 971017-18,entrance to Truck Bay of Radioactive High Level Waste Area Was Not Locked & Personnel Did Not Have Direct Oversight IR 05000295/19970261997-12-0505 December 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-26 & 50-304/97-26 on 971027-31. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support, Performance & Evaluated Effectiveness of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000295/19970311997-12-0404 December 1997 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Repts 50-295/97-31 & 50-304/97-31 on 971201.Violations Noted.Major Areas Discussed:Violations Involving Failures to Adequately Implement fitness-for-duty Program Requirements ML20202D9291997-11-28028 November 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970830-1010.Violation Noted:On 970910,while Returning QA Fire Pump Breaker to Svc IAW out-of-svc Number 970009297,non-licensed Operator Did Not Close Control Power Knife Switch as Required ML20202D9401997-11-28028 November 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-22 & 50-304/97-22 on 970830-1010. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000295/19970171997-10-10010 October 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-17 & 50-304/97-17 on 970619-0922.No Violations Noted But pre-decisional Enforcement Conference Will Be Scheduled to Discuss Violations Cited.Major Areas inspected:fitness-for-duty Related Events IR 05000295/19970181997-10-0202 October 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-18 & 50-304/97-18 on 970409-0730. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering ML20211J7991997-10-0202 October 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970409-0730.Violation Noted:Zion Station Measures to Control Matls Were Inadequate & Did Not Prevent Installation of Following,From 1992 to 1997,high Efficiency Particulate Air Filters ML20217F0861997-09-30030 September 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970719-0829.Violation Noted:On 970827,engineering Contractor Operated 2C Svc Water Pump Lower Bearing Suppl Isolation valve,2SW0624,w/o Authorization from Operations Dept IR 05000295/19970191997-09-30030 September 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-19 & 50-304/97-19 on 970719-0829. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering ML20217A3371997-09-12012 September 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 961207-970527.Violation Noted:During 1996 Unit 2 Refueling Outage,Irradiated Fuel Was Moved & Fuel Was Stored in Pool W/Less than 60 Days Decay Time & Fuel Bldg Exhaust Sys Was Operating PNO-III-97-071, on 970903,Comm Ed Announced Series of Mgt Changes & Restructuring of Nuclear Div Organization.New Site Vice Presidents at Braidwood & Quad Cities Former Plant Managers.State of Il Will Be Notified of Mgt Changes1997-09-0303 September 1997 PNO-III-97-071:on 970903,Comm Ed Announced Series of Mgt Changes & Restructuring of Nuclear Div Organization.New Site Vice Presidents at Braidwood & Quad Cities Former Plant Managers.State of Il Will Be Notified of Mgt Changes ML20217R2441997-09-0202 September 1997 Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $330,000.Violation Noted:Primary Nso Did Not Establish Power at or Less than Point of Adding Heat IAW GOP-4,step 5.21.f IR 05000295/19970161997-08-28028 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-16 & 50-304/97-16 on 970530-0718. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance & Engineering ML20216C4801997-08-28028 August 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970530-0718.Violation Noted:On 970510,during Performance of OSP 97-012,section 5.58,licensee Failed to Close 3L Kiene Valve ML20211C9071997-08-27027 August 1997 EN-97-080:on 970902,notice of Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $330,000 Issued to Licensee.Action Based on Three Severity Level III Violations Pertaining to Reactivity Mgt Problems & Command/Control Problems IR 05000295/19970201997-08-26026 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-20 & 50-304/97-20 on 970728-0801. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Plant Support Performance & Specifically,An Evaluation of Effectiveness of RP Program ML20217R3411997-08-26026 August 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970728-0801.Violation Noted:High Radiation Area W/Radiation Levels Greater than 1000 Mrem/Hr Was Not Locked & Personnel Did Not Have Direct Oversight of & Positive Control Over Each Entry Into Area IR 05000295/19970131997-08-15015 August 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-13 & 50-304/97-13 on 970404-0529. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support Re Failure to Immediately Notify CR of Fire in Unit 1 Containment Resulting in Violation ML20217P9661997-08-15015 August 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970404-0529.Violations Noted:Fire Resulted When Mechanical Maint Personnel Did Not Ensure That Adequate Natural or Mechanical Ventilation Was Established While Applying Flammable Lubricant to Rv Holes ML20149G6381997-07-17017 July 1997 Insp Rept 50-295/97-12 on 970311-0425.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering Associated W/Unit 1 Loss of Offsite Power Event That Occurred on 970311 ML20149G6341997-07-17017 July 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970311-0425.Violation Noted:On 970311,licensee Identified That Procedure Did Not Exist for Responding to Loss of Offsite Power That Resulted When Unit 1 Sys Auxiliary Transformer Tripped ML20149H9961997-07-16016 July 1997 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Rept on 970703.Areas Discussed:Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-295/97-02, 50-304/97-02,50-295/97-07 & 50-304/97-07 on 970206-0402 & 0312-0428 & Corrective Actions IR 05000295/19970151997-06-26026 June 1997 Insp Repts 50-295/97-15 & 50-304/97-15 on 970602-06.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Plant Support Performance & Effectiveness of RP Program 1999-09-01
[Table view] |
Inspection Report - Zion - 1997017 |
---|
|
|
Text
--
.
, .
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION lli Docket Nos: 50 295; 50 304 License Nos: DPR 39; DPR 48 Report Nos: 50-295/97017(DRS); 50-304/97017(DRS)
Licensee: Commonwealth Edison Company
'
Facility: Zion Station, Units 1 and 2 Location: 105 Shiloh Boulevard Zion,IL 60099 Dates: June 19 September 22,1997 Inspectors: J. Belanger, Senior Physical Security inspector J Creed, Chief. Plant Support Branch i Approved by: John A. Grobe, Acting Director Division of Reactor Safety fDR Db 0295 0 PDR a
__ - - -.- - -_ .
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
'
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Zion Generating Station, linits 1 and 2 NRC inspection Reports 50 295/97017; 50 304/97017 j
!
The initial purpose of the inspection was to evaluate two fitnew for-duty related events. The first occurred on February 1,1997. During the process of finalizing NRC review of that event the second event occurred on June 12,1997. Both events related to the apparent failures to take appropriate actions to ensure that required for-cause drug and alcohol tests on Individuals when the odor of alcohol was detected. These two events were reported to the NRC as required by 10 CFR Part 26. The inspection was expanded when additional examples of failures to follow fitness for-duty procedures were identified through the licensee's investigations and audit progra The inspectors concluded that the failure to conduct fitness for duty related evaluations and for cause tests occurred due to significant weaknesses in the licensee's fitness for-duty progra The following is a summary of the significant inspection findings and conclusion * The overall level of knowledge and comn.ltment to imp!oment the fitness for duty among several plant employees and managers were deficien * Due to ineffective corrective actions in response to CAR 22 06 006, the underlying problem of controlling and implementing the unscheduled call out process which contributed to the February 1,1997 event was not correcte (suction 7.1)
- Zion Administrative Procedure ZAP 1130-00, Revision 3 dated April 17,1995 did not provide clear direction to employees regarding their responsibilities and actions upon the detection of the odor of alcohol. (Section S3.1)
- Employees failed on four occasions to advise their supervisors of violations of the fitness for duty pobey and/or procedures. (Section 01.3)
- Two supervisors failed to require a for-cause test for an employee who smelled of alcohol within the protected area. (Section Si.2)
- * A supervisor failed to ask an employos if they had consumed alcohol within the five hour abstinence period prior to directing them to report to the station. The employee likewise failed tc Inform the supervisor that they had consumed alcohol within the abstinence period. The individual was later observed to smell of alcohol within the protected area. (Section S1.2)
- An employee who volunts rily came to work at a time outside of their normal work hours, and who had consumed alcohol within the five hour abstinence period, did not request an alcohol test upon site arrival as required, entered the protected area, and was later observed to smell of alcohol. (Section S1.4)
>
l
- _ _ __ ____
_- ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
Report Detalls IV. Plant Support 51 Conduct of Security nd Safeguarde Activities S1.1 General Commer.jn Some licensee and c6r. tract employees granted unescorted access to the protected area failed to demonstrate an adequate understandbg of the licensee's fitness for-duty (FFD) policy and procedures to onen trat the general performance objectives stated in 10 CcR Part 26.10 were met. Onntribuitna to the causes of several FFD events was an apparent lack of commitment on the par + of some employees and sorr.e superviso:3. :o following the licensee's FFD policy sad procedures aM weak procedural guldance for implementing the corporate nucleaf security guidelines (CNSG).
During the course of the NRC Inspection, the following relevant circumstances were identified and are outlined here for clarity:
- In March and April 1996 a Comed audit identified several Instances in which procedures relating to the FFD aspv n of unscheduled worker call outs that appeared were not being followe e In late 1906 (specific date uncertain) an employee (Employee A) smelled alcohol on a contractor and no one was informed, e in January 1997 auditors escalsted the significance of the previous FFD findings because corrective actions appeared ineffective, o On February 1,1997, the Director of Fire Prevention (DFP), who consumed alcohol within the previous five hours, was called and entered the protected are The odor of alcohol was confirmed on the DFP, and no for cause FFD test was 9ve * During an aud' conducted February 319,19?", the licensee identified additional failures to properly implement the FFD procedures relating to unscheduled worker call-out e On March 1,1997, the Emergency Response Coordinator (ERC) consumed alcohol within the previous five hours, entered the protected area and did not request a FFD test nor notify a supervisor. The odor was detected by another employee (Employee A), who also did not notify a supervisor, e On June 12,1997, the odor of alcohol was detacted on an individual and no supervisor was notifie __ __-
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
.
-
S1.2 Eailute_to Conduct For-Cause Test on February 1.1997 Insoection Scope (81502)
The inspectors reviewed corporate security Investigative Report No. 97 0080 dated March 6,1997 concoming a FFD event that occurred on February 1,1997. The licensee initiated the investigation on Februsry 12,1997, bcsed on a credible concern received by the Station Security Administrator on February 11,1997. The concem was raised by a non-supervisory contractor. The purpose of the inspector's review of the investigation report was to evaluate the safety and regulatory significance of the even Interviews with licensae investigators and managers were also conducte Qhsgrvation and Findinas On the evening of February 1,1997, the contract Director of Fire Protection (DFP) was called at home by a subordinate and notified that a fire watch person had been injured at the site. The DFP informed the caller that she had been drinking. The DFP then called a Fire Prevention Supervisor (FPS) at home and directed her to go to the site because the DFP had been drinking. The DFP later called the Comed Fire Marshall at home. The DFP was requested by the Comed Fire Marshall to report to the site to evaluate the situation. During that call the DFP apparently did not tell the Fire Marshall that alcohol was consumed within the previous five hours and the Fire Marshall did not ask. The 1.'FP drove to the site and entered the protected area (PA) at 9:29 p.m. Within about fifteen minutes after entry, several individuals observed that the DFP smelled of alcohol. They escorted the DFP to the access control facility and ensured that she exited at 10:00 p.m. They notified no one while the DFP was on site and failed to ensure that a for cause test was conducted when credible information that an individual may be under the influence of alcohol was know Zion Administrative Procedure 1130-00, Revision 3 dated April 17,1997 states that for-cause urinalysis and breath alcohol testing may be required for Commonwealth Edison or contractor employees, following any observed behavior indicatng possible substance abuse, including detection of the odor of alcohd per Corporate Nuclear Security Guide (CNSG 207) Testing For Cause. CNSG 207. Revision 9 dated November 1996 rer'uires a for-cause test when the odor of alcohol has been detected and a supervisor haa confirmed the odor of alcoho The failure of shift fire watch supervisors to ensure that a for-cause test was conducted when the smell of alcohol was confirmed on the DFP is considered an apparent violation of 10 CFR Part 26.24(a)(3) (Escalated Enforcement item (EEI) 50 295/97017-01; 50-304/97017 01).
Corporate Nuclear Guideline No. 200, Revision 0, dated June 1996, Paragraph requires that supervisors and others performing call-outs inquire and document if the person called to work unscheduled overtime has consumed alcohol within the five hour abstinence prior to reporting. The failure of the Fire Marshall when he directed the DFP
- ..
.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
-- _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - _
.
to report to the site to ask if she had consumed alcohol within the five hour abstinence period is conaldered an example of an apparent violation of this procedure (eel 50 295/97017 02; 50 304/97017 02).
Corporate Nuclear Guideline 200, Revision 6 dated Fr,bruary 1996, Paragraph 5. requires that if an Individual is called to work unscheduled overtime, they must inform the person calling if they have consumed alcohol within the five hours prior to reporting to work. The failure of the DFW to inform the Fire Marshall that she had been drinking alcohol when he told her to go in is an example of an apparent violation of this procedure (eel 50 295/97017-03; 50 304/97017 03). Conclusions Three apparent violations were identified. The Director of Fire Protection was not for-cause tested after being observed and confirmed to smell of alcohol inside the PA. The Fire Marshall failed to ask the Director of Fire Protection whether alcohol had been consumed within the previous five hours. The Director of Fire Protection failed to inform the Fire Marshall that alcohol had been concumed within five hours. These violations collectively demonstrate a lack of supervisory implementation of the FFD program which caused an individual who was admittedly drinking to enter the protected area. Although the direct safety impact of this Incident was small, the potential consequences were significan S1.3 Emolovee Performance - Communication of FFD ViQlallQas to Suoervisors
. insoection Scone (81502)
On June 13,1997, the licensee made a required twenty-four hour FFD report to the NRC relating to the failure to conduct a required for cause test on June 12,1997. The inspectors conducted an onsite review of this incident which included interviews and a review of records. The inspectors also reviewed the licensee's corporate security investigation report related to the even b.- Qbservations and Findinos On June 12,1997, at approximately 3:30 p.m., a licensee employee (Employee A)
detected the odor of alcohol on the breath of a contract employee (Contractor B).
Employee A left Contractor B and rel.ited this observation to another licensee employee (Employee C) who told him that "he should do something about It". Employee A then sought out and found Contractor B and told him that he should call Security and get FFD tested and left. Contractor B thought Employee A was joking because he did not escort
"
him nor notify a supervisor. Within a few minutes, Contractor B left the site at his nonnal quitting time without being tested. The licensee discovered this event later when Employee A called a security supervisor to inquire about the results of the FFD tes The security supervisor realized that a problem had occurred, because no one had been tested, and reported i __ _ _________ _____-
_
,
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - --
.
.
Corporate Nuclear Guideline No. 200, Revision 0 dated June 1990, paragraph 5. requires that individuals report to their supervisor instances of violation of the Fitness For Duty policy and/or procedures which might adversely impact safe operation and maintenance of the station. Employee A did not advise his supervisor of his observation concerning the odor of alcohol on Contractor Additional examples of this type were identifie During the licensee's follow-up investigation of the June 12th incident, Employee A stated that on two other occasions he smelled the odot cf alcohol on coworkers and had not advised his supervisor of those observations. The first occurrence happened sometime between September 15 and Christmas 1990. Employee A was not cerialn of the exact date of the first occurrence but only recalled that it was sometime between September 15 and Christmas 1996 and involved a work controller. Employee A stated that he smelled what he believed to be alcohol on the person and spoke to the worker about the odor but did not discuss it with anyone els Employee A stated that the second incident occurred on March 11,1997 during a General Station Emergency Plan (GSEP) activation. While in the onsite Technical Support Center (TSC) he smelled, what he described as a significant amount of alcohol on the breath of the Emergency Response Coordinator (ERC). In this Instance, Employee A told the ERC that he smelled alcohol and the ERC responded that he would go for testing. Employee A did not advise his supervisor of this observation. (See paragraph S1.4 for details).
The employee's (employee A and C) failure to notify their supervisors of violations of the licensee's FFD policy are considered examples of apparent violations of Corporate Nuclear Guideline 200, Paragraph 5.6.1 (eel 50-295/97017-04; 50 004/97017 04). The failure to report the violations precluded supervisors from acting in a timely manor when the concerns were identified. Those actions would include escorting the individual until the concern was sat lsfactorily resolved or until the individual left the protected area and removing the individual from work activities if their fitness was questionable, Conclusions Examples of violations of the FFD program were identified when the odor of alcohol was identified on a person in the PA and a supervisor was not notified. The ERC failed to report a violation of the FFD Program. An appropriate for-cause test was not completed. These violations demonstrate the cascadir? affect of individuals failure to properly implement the FFD procedures. A comprehensive for cause test was not conducted, for example, because an individual failed to notify his superviso Collectively, these events also represent a programmatic failure of the FFD program to provide reasonable assurance that those entering the PA unescorted are fi __ -.- - - .... _
. - - .. - - - - -. . .--.- . - . . - -. .
.
! *
S1.4 Protected Area Entrv Without FFD Test Followina CQatumDtion of Alcohol
-
- insoection Scooe (81502)
, The inspectors followed up on a FFD incident which occurred on March 11,1997 This
>
incident was first identified by the licen6ee during the investigation of the June *,0,199 This was the second FFD incident noted in the previous section (S1.3.b.). The
'
l Inspectors reviewed the licensee's investigation report and interviewed the key individuals involved. During the licensee's interview with Employee A relating to the
. June 12,1997 FFD incident, he stated that he had handled the smell of alcoholin the PA in a similar manner on March 11,1997.
! Observat!ons and Findinas l On March 11,1997, the loss of off sMe power for Unit 1 and a loss of telephone communications prompted a Work Week Planner (WWP) to telephone the Emergency j Response Coordinator (ERC) at home at approximately 5:25 p.m. They were surprised to discover that the ERC had not yet been informed that the plant had initiated an
>
- emergency response. Additionally, they discussed the need to solve the problem of the
, telephone system being degraded. The ERC stated that he knew how to correct the proble .'
i
!
In discussions with the inspectors, the WWP stated that he did not specifically request the ERC to come in and did not consider the telephone call to be a ' call out." He did
, not direct the ERC to report to the site, but did state that he was surprised that the ERC l was not called in because of his knowledge of the communication syste '
-
The ERC stated that the loss of communications was on his mind and he decided to go to the site to make sure the phones were working and was onsite within forty five minutes. The ERC said that he entered the PA knowing that he had consumed alcohol
,
within the past five hours. He stated that he proceeded to the phone room and then
- went to the Technical Support Center (TSC), He estimated that he was in the protected area for approximately twenty minutes. While in the TSC, he stated that it came to his
'
mind that he should be FFD tested because he had several beers at home prior to (within five hours) the phone call from the WWP, and was planning to do that. While he
'
was in the TSC the ERC met Employee A (Paragraph S1.3) who stated that he smelled alcohol on the ERC's breath and that he should go and get teste The ERC stated that after completing the TSC activities, he left the protected area and requested a test for alcohol. He told the security guards in the gatehouse that he needed an alcohol test because he had a few drinks. (The Security Shift Supervisor told the inspectors that he documented that WWP had called and requested a FFD test for the ERC.) The security staff, who administered the breath analyzer test, believed this to
!
be a voluntary test for a person entering the PA. Consequently, no drug urinalysis was conducted, as would be required during a for cause test. The SSS stated that he escorted the ERC to the in processing center, which is outside the PA, where a breath
,
alcohol test was conducted. The test results of .036% blood alcohol concentiation
4
,y, --..- -r- ... m- , y , - ,- . , , , -
-y -,, - ,, . - - - .. ,,,3 , -.m, ,. v--
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
. (BAC) were slightly below the licensee's cutoff level of .04% BAC. This fact was communicated to management and the individual re-entered the protected area. During their review of this incident, the licensee completed an informal test results extrapolation from the time the individual entered and protected area until he was tested and determined that he would have probably excoeded the cutoff level for alcohol had the test been done upon site arrival as required by procedur Corporate Nuclear Guideline No. 200, Revision 6 dated June 1996, Paragraph requires that each Individual who volun'arily comes to work at a time outside of his/her normal work hours should not have consumed alcohol within '.he five hour period prior to coming to work, and if alcohol has been consumed, the Individual must request an alcohol test upon site arrival. This matter will be reviewed furthe Conclusions The ERC entered the PA after consuming alcohol within the fi"o hour abstinence period without being tested as require *
S3 Fitness for Duty Procedures and Documentation S Evaluation of Procedures Insoection Scoce f81502)
The inspectors reviewed Zion Administrative Procedure (ZAP) 1130-00,* Commonwealth Edison Fitness for Duty Program", Revision 3 dated April 1995 and the Corporate Nuclear Security Guldelines" both of which implement the licensee's FFD Policy to determine if any procedure adherence or adequacy problems existe Observations and Findings On March 14,1997, the security staff wrote PIF 97-1414 documenting that in the previous six weeks there had been three separate incidents (one of which was the February 1,1997 fire watch incidein)in which management personnel had not followed
>
the requirements of ZAP 1130-00. A " root cause" investigation responding to the PIF identified that the ZAP 1130-00 was " lacking in substance and content", was not " user friendly", and that the procedure as a whole left one with "more questions than answers". The root cause investigation also noted that relevant information contained in the applicable CNSGs was not included in the procedure. Most departments did not have these procedures available for us The inspectors identified deficiencies with procedural adequacy relative to the FFD events described in this report. ZAP 1130-00 did not address acticas upon the detection of the odor of alcohol, call / outs for unscheduled work, or voluntary reporting to work after having consumed alcoho: within the five hour abstinence period. These subjects were adequately addressed in the CSNGs but as noted in the root cause
- - - - 1
-. __
- .
,
.
'
investigation, CNSGs were not readily available to most employees, inspector interviews with the employees involved in the March and June 1997 FFD events indicated that the guidance in ZAP 1130 was not adequate to addre;s the issue of detection of odor of alcoho Conclusions The inspectors concluded that the FFD guidance in ZAP 1130 was ineffective and may have caused the failure of an employee to take appropriate action, contributing to the March 11 and June 12 event S7 Quality Assurance in FFD Activities S7.1 Event Precursors and Previous Corrective Actions Insoection Scoce (81502)
The Inspectors rev!ewed the licensee's quality assurance audits to determine if there were precursor events and if management had corrected the underlying problems which contributed to these events, Observations and Findings Site Quality Verification (SQV) audit (QAA 22-96-02) conducted during the period of March 18,1996 through April 2,1996, identified that the requirements for unscheduled worker call outs were not met and issued a Level ll finding ' CAR 22 96-006). This finding related to the discovery that several' call-out" forms had not been annotated to indicated that the required FFD questions regarding alcohol use during the preceding five hours were asked or answered. The audit seemed to focus on the failure to complete the forms rather than on the implementation of the FFD program. The finding could have resulted in further questioning relating to the actual determination of the fitness of those being called in. A Corrective Action Request (CAR) was issued to cause corrective actions to be completed, in January 1997, the status of the CAR was elevated to a level B because of ineffective corrective actions taken to resolve this issue. The licensee's staff identified that corrective action had been ineffective because the problem was continuing to be identifie Later, SQV conducted the next regular annual aud;t February 319,1997 (QAA 97-01).
They found that the document problem appeared to be continuing, but further determined that the actual call outs for unscheduled work were not being performed in accordance with FFD procedures. Their interviews showed cases in which employees were called in but not asked the FFD questions. (Note: The FFD event involving the Director of Fire Protection (DFP) discussed in Section S1.a occurred on Februari 1, 1997).
_ _ _ _ _ - -
.
'
c, Gooclusions
.
Due to ineffective actions and weak analysis of the evidence available, the licensee
'
failed to correct the underlying problem which contributed to several FFD events. The licensee appeared to have indications of the potential problems that occurred, but did not recognize them and did not effectively correct them.
- X1 Exit Meeting Summary
,
l The inspectors presented the results of the inspection to members of licensee management at
, the conclusion of the inspection on September 22,1997. The licensee acknowledged the findings presented.
- _ The inspectors acknowledged the licensee's request to withhold documents associated with the j conduct of this inspection as identified by Comed istters dated June 19 and June 26,1997,
, under the provisions of 10 CFR 2.790.
'
)
,
f I
(
l
!
,
!
l
i
.
4
10 ,
_ _-_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
..
,
.
PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED Commonwgalth Edison Comoany S. DellaFave, Station Security Administrator R. Godley, Regulatory Assurance Manager
- K. Hansing, Technical Specification Improvement Program Supervisor (Telephone)
J. Mueller, Site Vice President R. Starkey, Plant General Manager G. Vanderheyden, Operations Manager (Telephone)
M. Weis, Station Services Director U.S. NorJear Regulatorv Commistdga E. Cobey, Resident inspector, Zion Station A. Vegel, Senior Resident inspector, Zion Station INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED IP 81502 Fitness For Duty ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED ORfta 50 295/304 97017-01 eel Failure to perform for cause FFD tes /304 97017-02 eel Failure to ask FFD questions when unscheduled work call out was conducte /304 97017-03 eel Failure to advise supervisor of consumption of alcohol within abstinence perio /304 97017-04 eel Multiple instances of employees falling to advise supervisors of FFD violation Discussed or Clgted None
,
, . . . .}
.
.
.
LIST OF ACRONYMS USED BAC Blood Alcohol Concentration CAR Corrective Action Request CFR Code of Federal Regulations CNSG Corporate Nuclear Security Guideline Comed Commonwealth Edison DFP Director of Fire Prevention eel Escalated Enforcement item ERC Emergency Response Coordinator FFD Fitness For Duty FPS Fire Prevention Supervisor GS Generating Station Emergency Plan PA Protected Area
PlF Problem identification Form QAA Quality Assurance Audit SOV Site Quality Verification SSS Security Shift Supervisor TSC Technical Support Center WWP Work Week Planner ZAP Zion Administrative Procedure
.
- - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _