|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20212B1681999-09-13013 September 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/99-12 & 50-323/99-12 on 990711- 08-21.Four Violations Being Treated as Noncited Violations ML20211A9501999-08-12012 August 1999 Discusses 990720-21 Workshop Conducted in Region IV Ofc,Re Exchange of Info in Area of Use of Risk Insights in Regulatory Activities.List of Attendees,Summary of Topic & Issues,Agenda & Copies of Handouts Encl ML20210L1461999-08-0303 August 1999 Informs That NRC Plans to Administer Gfes of Written Operator Licensing Exam on 991006.Requests Submittal of Ltr Identifying Individuals Taking Exam,Personnel Allowed Access to Exams & Mailing Address for Exams ML20210H6181999-07-27027 July 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/99-07 & 50-323/99-07 on 990503- 0714.Apparent Violations Being Considered for Escalated Enforcement Action ML18107A7011999-06-25025 June 1999 Requests Rev of NRC Records to Reflect Change of PG&E Address ML20205J3381999-04-0808 April 1999 Informs That Time Provided by NRC Regulation within Which Commission May Act to Review Director'S Decision Expired. Commission Declined Any Review & Became Final Agency Action on 990406.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990409 DCL-99-038, Forwards Decommissioning Funding Repts for Diablo Canyon Power Plant,Units 1 & 2 & Humboldt Bay Power Plant,Unit 3, Per Requirements of 10CFR50.75(f)1999-03-31031 March 1999 Forwards Decommissioning Funding Repts for Diablo Canyon Power Plant,Units 1 & 2 & Humboldt Bay Power Plant,Unit 3, Per Requirements of 10CFR50.75(f) DCL-99-033, Forwards Change 16 to Rev 18 of Diablo Canyon Power Plant Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Changes Do Not Decrease Safeguards Effectiveness of Plan.Without Encl1999-03-12012 March 1999 Forwards Change 16 to Rev 18 of Diablo Canyon Power Plant Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Changes Do Not Decrease Safeguards Effectiveness of Plan.Without Encl DCL-99-010, Forwards Change 15 to Rev 18 of Dcnpp Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan.Encl Withheld1999-01-26026 January 1999 Forwards Change 15 to Rev 18 of Dcnpp Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan.Encl Withheld ML20202A9831999-01-18018 January 1999 Informs That Modesto Irrigation District No Longer Seeking Addl Interconnection with Pacific Gas & Electric Co at Pittsburg,Ca & Matters First Addressed in 980429 Comments in Opposition to Restructuring of Util Have Now Become Moot IR 05000275/19980121999-01-13013 January 1999 Informs That Insp Repts 50-275/98-12 & 50-323/98-12 Have Been Canceled DCL-98-163, Forwards Change 14 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan. Changes Do Not Decrease Safeguards Effectiveness of Plan & Submitted Pursuant to 10CFR50.54(p).Encl Withheld1998-11-24024 November 1998 Forwards Change 14 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan. Changes Do Not Decrease Safeguards Effectiveness of Plan & Submitted Pursuant to 10CFR50.54(p).Encl Withheld ML20195G5161998-11-16016 November 1998 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/98-16 & 50-323/98-16 on 980913- 1024.No Violations Noted ML20155F7951998-11-0303 November 1998 Second Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents. Records Subj to Request Encl & Identified in App C DCL-98-123, Submits Listed Address Changes for NRC Service Lists for Listed Individuals1998-09-0909 September 1998 Submits Listed Address Changes for NRC Service Lists for Listed Individuals DCL-98-108, Submits 90-day Response to NRC GL 98-01, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Util Has Pursued & Continuing to Pursue Year 2000 Readiness Program Similar to That Outlined in Nei/Nusmg 97-07, Nuclear Util Year..1998-08-0707 August 1998 Submits 90-day Response to NRC GL 98-01, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Util Has Pursued & Continuing to Pursue Year 2000 Readiness Program Similar to That Outlined in Nei/Nusmg 97-07, Nuclear Util Year.. ML20236T2931998-07-24024 July 1998 Forwards Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Activities for 5 Yrs.Order Being Issued Due to Falsification of Info on Application to Obtain Unescorted Access to PG&E Plant ML20236T3431998-07-22022 July 1998 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/98-11 & 50-323/98-11 on 980526-28.Apparent Violations Identified & Being Considered for Escalated Enforcement Action ML20236J2251998-07-0101 July 1998 Ltr Contract,Task Order 232 Entitled, Review of Callaway, Comanche,Diablo Canyon & Wolf Creek Applications for Conversion to Improved TS Based on Standard TS, Under Contract NRC-03-95-026 ML20236G0691998-06-19019 June 1998 Forwards Endorsement 123 to Neila Policy NF-228,Endorsement 145 to Neila Policy NF-113,Endorsement 124 to Neila Policy NF-228 & Endorsement 89 to Maelu Policy MF-103 IR 05000275/19980051998-04-17017 April 1998 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/98-05 & 50-323/98-05 on 980202-06 & 23-27 & 0302-18.No Violations Noted.Insp Focused on Resolution of Previous NRC Insp Findings & Included Review of Issues Identified During Architect/Engineering Insp Rept ML20203G0371998-02-25025 February 1998 Forwards Revised Copy of NRC Form 398, Personal Qualification Statement - Licensee, (10/97) Encl 1,which Has Been Revised to Reflect Current Operator Licensing Policy DCL-98-014, Forwards Change 12 to Rev 18 to Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Plan Withheld1998-02-10010 February 1998 Forwards Change 12 to Rev 18 to Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Plan Withheld ML20199H6691998-02-0202 February 1998 Ack Receipt of ,Transmitting Rev 18,change 11, to Plant Physical Security Plan,Submitted Under Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p).Role of Video Capture Audible Alarm Sys Needs to Be Addressed in Security Plan,Per 980123 Telcon DCL-97-187, Forwards Change 11,rev 18 to Physical Security Plan.Encl 1 Describes Proposed Revs to Physical Security Plan.Plan Withheld1997-11-19019 November 1997 Forwards Change 11,rev 18 to Physical Security Plan.Encl 1 Describes Proposed Revs to Physical Security Plan.Plan Withheld IR 05000275/19970181997-10-31031 October 1997 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/97-18 & 50-323/97-18 on 971006- 10.Insp Verified That Liquid & Gaseous Radioactive Waste Effluent Mgt Program Was Properly Implemented.No Violations Noted DCL-97-156, Provides Change 10 to Rev 18 of Physcial Security Plan & Change 2 to Rev 3 of Safeguards Contingency Plan.Plans Withheld1997-09-16016 September 1997 Provides Change 10 to Rev 18 of Physcial Security Plan & Change 2 to Rev 3 of Safeguards Contingency Plan.Plans Withheld ML20210H4671997-08-0202 August 1997 Requests That NRC Suspend Investigation & Review of Issues Raised by Modesto Irrigation District & Transmission Agency of Northern CA Re Contention That PG&E Had Violated Nuclear License Conditions Known as Stanislaus Commitments ML20137N1591997-03-31031 March 1997 Informs That Licensee Facility Scheduled to Administer NRC GFE on 970409.Sonalsts,Inc Authorized Under Contract to Support NRC Administration of GFE Activities ML16343A4801997-02-25025 February 1997 Forwards non-proprietary WCAP-14796 & Proprietary WCAP-14795, Nrc/Util Meeting on Model 51 SG Tube Integrity & ARC Methodology. Proprietary Rept Withheld,Per 10CFR2.90 ML20134H6271997-02-10010 February 1997 Fifth Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Records in App I Encl & Available in Pdr.App J Records Withheld in Part (Ref FOIA Exemption 5) & App K Records Completely Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 5) ML20134K3421997-02-0606 February 1997 Conveys Results & Conclusions of Operational Safeguards Response Evaluation Conducted by NRR at Plant,Units 1 & 2, on 960909-12.W/o Encl ML16342D5291997-01-31031 January 1997 Transmits WCAPs Supporting NRCs Review of License Amend Request 96-10,rev of TSs to Support Extended Fuel Cycles to 24 months.WCAP-11082,rev 5,WCAP-11594,rev 2 & WCAP-14646,rev 1 Withheld ML16342D5331997-01-24024 January 1997 Requests Proprietary Version of WCAP-14646,rev 1, Instrumentation Calibration & Drift Evaluation for Diablo Canyon Units 1 & 2,24 Month Fuel Cycle Evaluation, Jan 1997 Be Withheld from Public Disclosure Per 10CFR2.790 ML16342D5311997-01-24024 January 1997 Requests That WCAP-11594,rev 2, W Improved Thermal Design Procedure Instrument Uncertainty Methodology,Diablo Canyon Units 1 & 2,24 Month Fuel Cycle Evaluation Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790 ML16342D5321997-01-24024 January 1997 Requests WCAP-11082,rev 5, Westinghouse Setpoint Methodology for Protection Sys,Diablo Canyon Units 1 & 2,24 Month Fuel Cycle Evaluation, Jan 1996 Be Withheld from Public Disclosure Per 10CFR2.790 ML20136C3521997-01-11011 January 1997 Discusses Japan Oil Spill & Np Intake & Possibilities of Such Event Occurring at SONGS or Dcnpp ML20133F8961997-01-0909 January 1997 Responds to NRC Ltr of 961206 Received on 961210 Which Requested Further Info Re Utils Violations of Conditions of Its Nuclear Licenses Designated to Promote & Protect Competition in Bulk Power Market in Northern & Central CA ML20133F8721997-01-0909 January 1997 Acks & Responds to NRC Ltr of 961206 Received by Undersigned on 961210 Requesting Further Info to Document Tancs Assertion,Per Filing on 960429 That Util Has Violated Terms & Conditions of Nuclear Power Project Licenses ML16342D5521996-12-18018 December 1996 Requests That Proprietary WCAP-14795, Nrc/Util Meeting on Model 51 SG Tube Integrity & ARC Methology, Be Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(b)(4)) ML20129J4001996-10-18018 October 1996 Forwards Order Approving Corporate Restructuring by Establishment of Holding Company & Safety Evaluation NSD-NRC-96-4846, Transmits Proprietary & non-proprietary Versions of Preliminary Rept, Incomplete Rcca Insertion. W Authorization ltr,AW-96-1021 & Affidavit Requesting Info Be Withheld from Public Disclosure Encl1996-10-16016 October 1996 Transmits Proprietary & non-proprietary Versions of Preliminary Rept, Incomplete Rcca Insertion. W Authorization ltr,AW-96-1021 & Affidavit Requesting Info Be Withheld from Public Disclosure Encl ML20129G6121996-09-24024 September 1996 Second Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents. Forwards Documents Listed in App C,E,F & G.Documents Available in Pdr.App E,F & G Documents Partially Withheld Ref FOIA Exemptions 4 & 6.App D Record Listed as Copyright DCL-96-170, Forwards Change 1 to Rev 4 of Training & Qualification Plan, Per 10CFR50.54(p).Plan Withheld1996-08-14014 August 1996 Forwards Change 1 to Rev 4 of Training & Qualification Plan, Per 10CFR50.54(p).Plan Withheld DCL-96-141, Submits Change 9 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan.Plan Withheld1996-07-31031 July 1996 Submits Change 9 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan.Plan Withheld ML20116B8411996-07-22022 July 1996 Forwards Revisions to SR 95-03,SR 95-04 & SR 95-05 Re EDG 1-2 Valid Failures ML20117E6171996-05-24024 May 1996 Forwards Public Version of Rev 11 to EPIP EP R-7, Off-Site Transportation Accidents DCL-96-102, Submits Change 8 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Encl Withheld1996-05-0606 May 1996 Submits Change 8 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.54(p).Encl Withheld DCL-96-096, Forwards Public Version of Rev 3 to Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 & 2 Emergency Plan, Change 151996-04-16016 April 1996 Forwards Public Version of Rev 3 to Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 & 2 Emergency Plan, Change 15 DCL-96-054, Forwards Change 7 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan & Change 1 to Rev 3 of Safeguards Contingency Plan.Encl Withheld1996-02-28028 February 1996 Forwards Change 7 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan & Change 1 to Rev 3 of Safeguards Contingency Plan.Encl Withheld 1999-09-13
[Table view] Category:NRC TO STATE/LOCAL GOVERNMENT
MONTHYEARML20205R1641988-10-18018 October 1988 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Informs That App a & B Documents Available in Pdr.Forwards Partially Deleted App B & C Documents (Ref FOIA Exemption 5) IA-88-102, Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Informs That App a & B Documents Available in Pdr.Forwards Partially Deleted App B & C Documents (Ref FOIA Exemption 5)1988-10-18018 October 1988 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Informs That App a & B Documents Available in Pdr.Forwards Partially Deleted App B & C Documents (Ref FOIA Exemption 5) ML20205C3521988-09-23023 September 1988 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents Re Plant. Forwards App D Documents.App D Documents Also Available in PDR ML20153G9331988-08-15015 August 1988 Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Forwards App C Document.Documents Available in PDR IA-88-187, Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Forwards App a Documents.Subj Documents Also Available in Pdr.Addl Records Being Addressed in FOIA-88-156.Instructions for Obtaining Records from PDR Also Encl1988-06-20020 June 1988 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Forwards App a Documents.Subj Documents Also Available in Pdr.Addl Records Being Addressed in FOIA-88-156.Instructions for Obtaining Records from PDR Also Encl ML20150E7811988-06-20020 June 1988 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Forwards App a Documents.Subj Documents Also Available in Pdr.Addl Records Being Addressed in FOIA-88-156.Instructions for Obtaining Records from PDR Also Encl IA-88-104, Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents Re SECY-81-636. Forwards App B Documents Subj to Categories A-E & G of Request.Documents Also Available in PDR1988-05-0202 May 1988 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents Re SECY-81-636. Forwards App B Documents Subj to Categories A-E & G of Request.Documents Also Available in PDR ML20153C8681988-05-0202 May 1988 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents Re SECY-81-636. Forwards App B Documents Subj to Categories A-E & G of Request.Documents Also Available in PDR IA-88-101, Final Response to FOIA Request Re SECY-82-414.Forwards App B Document.Encl Also Available in PDR1988-04-29029 April 1988 Final Response to FOIA Request Re SECY-82-414.Forwards App B Document.Encl Also Available in PDR ML20153D5751988-04-29029 April 1988 Final Response to FOIA Request Re SECY-82-414.Forwards App B Document.Encl Also Available in PDR ML20151D8351988-04-0808 April 1988 Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents.App a Document Totally Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 5) ML20196F6301988-03-0101 March 1988 Final Response to FOIA Request Forwarding Two Printouts of Central Files Documents from 1980 to Present.W/O Encl IA-88-110, Final Response to FOIA Request Forwarding Two Printouts of Central Files Documents from 1980 to Present.W/O Encl1988-03-0101 March 1988 Final Response to FOIA Request Forwarding Two Printouts of Central Files Documents from 1980 to Present.W/O Encl ML20211C5251987-02-0606 February 1987 Discusses NRC Analysis of Licensing Schedules for Facility, Per Util 870202 Request for NRC Statement to State of Ca. NRC Sept 1981 - Feb 1982 Monthly Repts to Congress Re Licensing Projections for Pending OL Applications Encl IA-86-699, Responds to FOIA Request to DOJ for Records Re DOJ Investigation of Util Role in Siting,Licensing & Constructing Diablo Canyon.Forwards App a & B Documents. Documents Also Available in PDR1986-12-0303 December 1986 Responds to FOIA Request to DOJ for Records Re DOJ Investigation of Util Role in Siting,Licensing & Constructing Diablo Canyon.Forwards App a & B Documents. Documents Also Available in PDR ML20214U1621986-12-0303 December 1986 Responds to FOIA Request to DOJ for Records Re DOJ Investigation of Util Role in Siting,Licensing & Constructing Diablo Canyon.Forwards App a & B Documents. Documents Also Available in PDR ML20197D8461986-04-24024 April 1986 Further Response to FOIA Request for Documents Re NUREG-1055.Forwards App a Documents.Apps a & B Documents Available in Pdr.Availability of Other Documents Listed ML20138F9151985-11-27027 November 1985 Further Response to FOIA Request for Three Categories of Records Re NUREG-1055 & M Engelman .Apps O & P Documents Available in PDR ML20213F0101984-09-21021 September 1984 Informs of 841004 Meeting W/Util & USGS in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Proposed Seismic Reevaluation Program Re Geology & Tectonics ML20126K0851981-05-0404 May 1981 Responds to to President Reagan Urging Careful Consideration of Safety Issues in Licensing Facilities in Ca.Nrc Conducts Detailed Review of All CP & OL Applications ML20244B4431977-03-18018 March 1977 Responds to 770310 Telegram to Chairman Rowden Re Procedures to Be Followed by NRC in Making Final Determination Concerning Licensing of Facility.Decision to Issue Interim License Could Be Reached by End of Yr Pending Justification 1988-09-23
[Table view] Category:OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20212B1681999-09-13013 September 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/99-12 & 50-323/99-12 on 990711- 08-21.Four Violations Being Treated as Noncited Violations ML20211A9501999-08-12012 August 1999 Discusses 990720-21 Workshop Conducted in Region IV Ofc,Re Exchange of Info in Area of Use of Risk Insights in Regulatory Activities.List of Attendees,Summary of Topic & Issues,Agenda & Copies of Handouts Encl ML20210L1461999-08-0303 August 1999 Informs That NRC Plans to Administer Gfes of Written Operator Licensing Exam on 991006.Requests Submittal of Ltr Identifying Individuals Taking Exam,Personnel Allowed Access to Exams & Mailing Address for Exams ML20210H6181999-07-27027 July 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/99-07 & 50-323/99-07 on 990503- 0714.Apparent Violations Being Considered for Escalated Enforcement Action ML20205J3381999-04-0808 April 1999 Informs That Time Provided by NRC Regulation within Which Commission May Act to Review Director'S Decision Expired. Commission Declined Any Review & Became Final Agency Action on 990406.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990409 IR 05000275/19980121999-01-13013 January 1999 Informs That Insp Repts 50-275/98-12 & 50-323/98-12 Have Been Canceled ML20195G5161998-11-16016 November 1998 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/98-16 & 50-323/98-16 on 980913- 1024.No Violations Noted ML20155F7951998-11-0303 November 1998 Second Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents. Records Subj to Request Encl & Identified in App C ML20236T2931998-07-24024 July 1998 Forwards Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Activities for 5 Yrs.Order Being Issued Due to Falsification of Info on Application to Obtain Unescorted Access to PG&E Plant ML20236T3431998-07-22022 July 1998 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/98-11 & 50-323/98-11 on 980526-28.Apparent Violations Identified & Being Considered for Escalated Enforcement Action ML20236J2251998-07-0101 July 1998 Ltr Contract,Task Order 232 Entitled, Review of Callaway, Comanche,Diablo Canyon & Wolf Creek Applications for Conversion to Improved TS Based on Standard TS, Under Contract NRC-03-95-026 IR 05000275/19980051998-04-17017 April 1998 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/98-05 & 50-323/98-05 on 980202-06 & 23-27 & 0302-18.No Violations Noted.Insp Focused on Resolution of Previous NRC Insp Findings & Included Review of Issues Identified During Architect/Engineering Insp Rept ML20203G0371998-02-25025 February 1998 Forwards Revised Copy of NRC Form 398, Personal Qualification Statement - Licensee, (10/97) Encl 1,which Has Been Revised to Reflect Current Operator Licensing Policy ML20199H6691998-02-0202 February 1998 Ack Receipt of ,Transmitting Rev 18,change 11, to Plant Physical Security Plan,Submitted Under Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p).Role of Video Capture Audible Alarm Sys Needs to Be Addressed in Security Plan,Per 980123 Telcon IR 05000275/19970181997-10-31031 October 1997 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/97-18 & 50-323/97-18 on 971006- 10.Insp Verified That Liquid & Gaseous Radioactive Waste Effluent Mgt Program Was Properly Implemented.No Violations Noted ML20137N1591997-03-31031 March 1997 Informs That Licensee Facility Scheduled to Administer NRC GFE on 970409.Sonalsts,Inc Authorized Under Contract to Support NRC Administration of GFE Activities ML20134H6271997-02-10010 February 1997 Fifth Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Records in App I Encl & Available in Pdr.App J Records Withheld in Part (Ref FOIA Exemption 5) & App K Records Completely Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 5) ML20134K3421997-02-0606 February 1997 Conveys Results & Conclusions of Operational Safeguards Response Evaluation Conducted by NRR at Plant,Units 1 & 2, on 960909-12.W/o Encl ML20129J4001996-10-18018 October 1996 Forwards Order Approving Corporate Restructuring by Establishment of Holding Company & Safety Evaluation ML20129G6121996-09-24024 September 1996 Second Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents. Forwards Documents Listed in App C,E,F & G.Documents Available in Pdr.App E,F & G Documents Partially Withheld Ref FOIA Exemptions 4 & 6.App D Record Listed as Copyright ML20149H8171994-12-23023 December 1994 Advises That 941010 & 1102 Changes 4 & 5 to Rev 18 of Physical Security Plan,Respectively Consistent W/Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p) & Acceptable ML20059L5031994-01-28028 January 1994 Extends Invitation to Participate in Workshop Re Emergency Preparedness & Incident Response on 940222 in Arlington,Tx ML20058A1211993-11-16016 November 1993 Forwards Safeguards Info Referenced in Preliminary Draft Guide Re Proposed Rule for Protection Against Manevolent Use of Vehicles at Nuclear Power Plants.Encl Withheld IR 05000275/19930211993-08-27027 August 1993 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/93-21 & 50-323/93-21 on 930726-30.Non-cited Violations Identified.Insp Repts Withheld in Entirety Ref 10CFR73.21 ML20057B3241993-05-0404 May 1993 Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Forwards Documents Listed in App Q Which Are Being Made Available at Pdr.Documents Listed in App R Are Partially Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 5) ML20058M0361993-04-12012 April 1993 Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Forwards Records in App L Which Are Being Withheld Partially for Listed Reasons,(Ref FOIA Exemptions 5) ML20056C2811993-01-29029 January 1993 Ltr Contract,Mod 1 to Task Order 5,providing Incremental Funding of Listed Amount,To IPE Reviews,Internal Events Back-End-Only ML20127F1091993-01-13013 January 1993 Extends Invitation to Participate as Breakout Session Facilitator on 930217-18 at Workshop Hosted by Regions IV & V in Arlington,Tx to Discuss Operability/Degraded Equipment as Specified in GL 91-18.Record Copy IR 05000275/19920321992-12-11011 December 1992 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/92-32 & 50-323/92-32 on 921116-19 & Notice of Violation.Violation Noted Re Failure to Withdraw Security Safeguards Access List.Encls Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) IR 05000275/19920281992-12-0202 December 1992 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/92-28 & 50-323/92-28 on 921005-09.No Violations Noted.Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20058B5331990-10-22022 October 1990 Forwards Partially Withheld Safeguards Insp Repts 50-275/90-17 & 50-323/90-17 on 900924-28.Licensee Identified Violations Reviewed But Not Cited ML20058N8501990-08-10010 August 1990 Responds to Forwarding Correspondence from Bl Boxer & Le Panetta Re Seismic Safety of Plant.Nrc Will Complete Review of Plant Seismic Reevaluation Program & Will Document Findings in SER DD-90-03, Advises That Time for Commission to Review Director'S Decision DD-90-03 Expired.Commission Declined Review. Decision Became Final Agency Action on 900724.Served on 900731.W/Certificate of Svc1990-07-27027 July 1990 Advises That Time for Commission to Review Director'S Decision DD-90-03 Expired.Commission Declined Review. Decision Became Final Agency Action on 900724.Served on 900731.W/Certificate of Svc ML20059M9781990-06-13013 June 1990 Forwards NRC Performance Indicators for First Quarter 1990. W/O Encl ML20246K4721989-08-28028 August 1989 Advises That 880419 Rev 2 to Guard Training & Qualification Plan Consistent W/Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p) & Acceptable ML20246E5321989-08-22022 August 1989 Forward Summary of Sys Engineering/Design Engineering Initiatives & ...Quarterly Sys Status Rept,2nd Quarter 1989.... Rept Demonstrates Depth,Scope & Usefulness of Walkdown as Tool for Assessing Sys Status,Problems & Trends IR 05000275/19890201989-07-31031 July 1989 Forwards Safeguards Insp Repts 50-275/89-20 & 50-323/89-20 on 890710-14.No Violations Noted ML20245D9431989-04-18018 April 1989 Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/89-12 & 50-323/89-12 on 890403-07.No Violations or Deficiencies Noted IR 05000275/19890071989-03-24024 March 1989 Forwards Safeguards Insp Repts 50-275/89-07 & 50-323/89-07 on 890227-0303.No Violations Noted.Repts Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(d) & 73.21) ML20235W2621989-03-0101 March 1989 Final Response to FOIA Request for Transcripts Re Facility. Forwards App H Documents.App H Documents Also Available in Pdr.App I Documents Partially Withheld Per Sunshine Act ML20205R1641988-10-18018 October 1988 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Informs That App a & B Documents Available in Pdr.Forwards Partially Deleted App B & C Documents (Ref FOIA Exemption 5) IA-88-102, Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Informs That App a & B Documents Available in Pdr.Forwards Partially Deleted App B & C Documents (Ref FOIA Exemption 5)1988-10-18018 October 1988 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Informs That App a & B Documents Available in Pdr.Forwards Partially Deleted App B & C Documents (Ref FOIA Exemption 5) ML20205C3521988-09-23023 September 1988 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents Re Plant. Forwards App D Documents.App D Documents Also Available in PDR IA-88-455, Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.App a Documents Available in PDR1988-09-0808 September 1988 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.App a Documents Available in PDR ML20155F8691988-09-0808 September 1988 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.App a Documents Available in PDR ML20153H6121988-08-18018 August 1988 Final Response to FOIA Request.Forwards App E Documents.Apps D & E Documents Available in Pdr.Charges for Search, Duplication & Postage Listed ML20151X2161988-08-18018 August 1988 Ack Receipt of Transmitting Scenario for Util 1988 Annual Emergency Preparedness Exercise ML20153G9331988-08-15015 August 1988 Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Forwards App C Document.Documents Available in PDR ML20153H1821988-08-12012 August 1988 Responds to 880505 Appeal of Denial of Documents & Portions of Documents Identified on Encl Apps E & F in 880425 Response to FOIA 87-444.Documents or Portions of Documents Continue to Be Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 5) ML20151U3741988-08-11011 August 1988 Informs of NRC Interpretation of 10CFR50.74(a) Re Changes in Operator or Senior Operator Status 1999-09-13
[Table view] |
Text
- - .. - - . ~ . . - . - .. -
U.S. NUCLEAR i.EGULATO2Y COMMIS$10N
si
[ * ~'e. .
t -
c whst =ec%
= pi.l
.- - f . E
! D RESPONSE TO FREEDOM OF Ml 6 Al '"' I I " '
/ Y
( ..... ' f INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REQUEST DO(att %ygg a $, am ai APR L9_Lgsg m
MQvt h i
~ 0 t .fi
~PART't.-RICORDS RELI ASED OR NOT LOCATED ISee checard bensi No agency records hbpct to the roovest have been loca'od No addite: mal agency records subpct to the roovest have been bcated.
Agency recorde tubect to the reqwest that a<e coetied e Appendea a's alreah av6.Lable for pwWic especton and cooveg e the NRC Pubhc Document Room.
1717 H Street. N W.. w ashecton. OC .
Agency records swbre ct to the request thrt are dentded e Append 4a _ _ _ are be ag made as adaNo for pwbhc especton and copyeg e the NRC PwN< Document Koom.1717 H Street. N W . Wuhegton. OC. e a folder under the FOWowmber and rea wester nam i
The nonproprotary verson of the proposaus) that vow ag eed to accept e a te.ephone conversaten with a mornber of my staM e now teng made avadaNo for owbhc especten and c4yes at the NRC Pubhc Docwment Room.1717 H Street. N W . Wash.rsgtcA DC. e a folder under the FOi A under and reowester name Enclosed e eformaton on how vow may obta.n access to and the cha ges for coomg records paaced e tM NRC Pow-c Document Room.1717 H Street, N W . Washegton. OC Agency records Abrect to the reQvest are enclosed Any apphCab60 Charge for Copes of the records prowded and payNat procedw+es are noted an the Comments secton.
Records sobrect to the roovest %e been re' erred to ano+er Federa agencyhest for reve* and d. rect respoese to you in view of NRC's response to the reowest. no twether acton a beeg taken on appeal letter dated PART 11 A-INFORMATION WITHHE'.D FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE Certa 4n eformaton in the reavestes records e te.ng wrtu eid from pubhc dsciosure pwesvant to the FOf A esemptons descnbed e and for the reasces stated e Pa*t ti, sec.
tons 8. C. aawf D Any rersesed portoes of the documents for *hech ordy c.aq of the record a beeg *fthheld a*e bem mese avataNo for owbhc esrecten and copying e the NRC Pubhc Document Room.1717 H Street. N W . Washegton. DC. e a fo6 der under this FOi A nwmter end reawester na *e Cc =-- O l
i l
8805090201 880429 PDR FOIA PDR ;
WEISSMA88-101 m _
j l'G av gcyon DYSC' 6f1 a%g atCCROS ,
V
- K
_w A , ;
NIC FOIM 464 ears o 9 ts
l 8
j ' -~
APPENDIX
)
RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE POR UNDER THE ABOVE REQUEST NUMBER ,
NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION L l5 $ f ( % L1L, (O ~D O ~b~ IN ontitd, ' % e bp bem %koth krom -The11 heendaruins':
LR mes) l l
I
- - - - . .-. .- . _. _ .. _ _. _J
$1 Aff of CALWOGNIA GloeG( D(UK#1JtAN, Gewmor
)
PUBLIC UTilfilES CCMAMISSK)N l MS VAN MM AWNW SAN FR ANC15CO. CA 94102 3299 February 8, 1988 fBDEDOM OF INFORMATKM ACI REQUEST Mr. Donnie H. Grimsley, Director Division of Rules and Records g y _jy g/ j Office of Administration and Resources Management t g g,,,jeg ,,g U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission '
Washington, D.C. 20555 RE: FnIA Request for Staff Requirement Memoranda
Dear Mr. Grimsley:
Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act and 10 CFR Part 9, Subpart A, "Freedom of Information Act Regulations", please make available at the Commission's Washington, D.C., Public Document Room single copies of records in the following categories:
A. All concurrence sheets--e.g. each page on which concurrence is indicated by signature, initials, dates or other means--for SECY-82-414, as approved by the Commission on March 4, 1982.
B. Any drafts, revisions, annotated copies, etc. of the document which became SECY-82-414. This request includes any attachments to these documents. Please provide any concurrence sheets--as defined above--for any of these documents.
C. Commission request COMJA-82-6, cited in SECY-P1-414.
We request a waiver of fees pursuant to 10 CFR 9.41 because the documents will be used by a state agency as part of an official investigation.
If you or any members of your staff have any questions concerning this request, please contact the undersigned directly by telephone at (415) 557-0168. It is requested that, if documents are identified which are releaseable under this request, partial responses be made as appropriate. Your prompt attention to this request will be appreciated.
Si rely, ,
ven Weissman Staff Counsel SW:bjk "y YON lSU(0
6 - ~ :.
- , 1 .
OCT 131982.
-s gp E"hW[
FOR: The Comissioners 50-2 b FPM: William J. Dircks, Executive Director for Operations SUNECT: DI ABLO CANYOff M51Gy '.'ERIFICATI0t PROG %M -
PNASE !! PLCH 3 D,MT10!.'S PURPOSE: In accordance with the Corr.ission's request (COFUA *2-6) of July 27, 1962, this paper provides the staff recomendations regarding Phase !! of the Diablo Canyon Independent Desiqn Verification Program (IDVP) and its relationship to the ongoing Phase I progran.
e.
- ACKCR0m s
By eenorandum dated September 24, 1982, we provided you with a Status Report of ongoing activities associated with the verification of the seismic design of Otablo Canyon Unit 1. The memorandufs noted that findings fron Phase ,
i l of the 10VD and other recent developments may influence the staff's conclusions with regard to the Phase !! Program Plan which was submitted to the NRC for approval on June 18, 1982. We have continued to pursue those matters and have developed our recomendations with regard to the Program Plan. The staf f findings and recomendations are discusseri below.
015CU55109: Ve have sutrarized in Figure 1 the elements of the Order and letter of t:ovember 10, 1981. The original requirerents needed to suoport a fuel-load / low-power (fl./LP) decision bave becore known as Phase I whereas iters originally rer.uiring completion before a recision regarcice never levels greater than M were definec as Phase !!. It is important to note that although they were defirec as such at the tine, both the Phase I Order and the Phase !! letter acknowledged that an expansiese of either or beR efforts may be necessary. In this context, the staff examiined the overall findinas to date and a number of recent develop ents to determine if any modifications to the originally cefined scope of Phase I and Phase 11 need j N he feRtt M$59i pp. made.
1 Eise g
NRR/01, j
omeny + .3y.7.y. . .". .. ... ... ... ... . .. . .ut,
............ . . . . ~ . . . . ~ . . ~ . ~ . -.~.---.-- -~~~-.--" - " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ""*"""""""""
sunnwa > ...................... ...................... . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . ............~.....~ . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . - - ~ ~ ~ . - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~-
ous> ...................... ........................ ...................... .....................- - . . . ~ . ~ . - ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ . - ~ ~ ~ . . ~ . - ~ ~ ~ . - ~ .
NRC FORM 314 (14M) hacu om OFFiCI AL RECORD COPY usamm-na
v Overall Findings to Date As of Septerter 24, 1982, the IDVP had identified 199 technical concerns requiring resolution. A nuder of these have subsequently been resolved and 13 have been
+
classified as 'A/B' errors. These are errors in which design criteria or operating limits of safety-related ;
equipment could have been exceeded and physical modifications, changes in operating procedures, more realistic calculations, or retesting are required to bring the plant into conformance )
with the original design. These technical concerns can i be sumarized as follows: i Fully resolved: 147 Errors: 3 (3 A/B errors)
No design criterfs, or operating limits exceeded: 144 Review continuing: 52
by PG4E: 28 (9 A/B errors) by IDVP: 24 (1 A/B errors)
Total IN~ TIT A/B errors)
Furthermre, PG&E has identified 33 concerns within their Internal Technical Program (ITP). Six have been resolved j and 27 concerns have been classified as A/B errors. i These errors are not directly additive because there exists sore overlap between the 10VP and ITP errors.
As of September 15,1992, PG8E had cocpleted 344 rodifica- )
tions as follows:
Modifications Pipe supports 257 Other supports 43 Annulus structure 34 Other 6
. Total 344 It should be noted that not all A/B errors will necessiate modifications and that a single error may result in a nu2er of sodifications. In addition so.Te of these modifications, nace to date, were a result of the errors from either, or both, the IDVP and ITP and some were modifications unMrtaken by PC&E even though they believe the error could have been sh%n acceptable by c'a tai l e d calculations.
orr,c , ........................ . . . . . . . . . . ...................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................... ................... .....................
svame) ...................... . . . . . . . - . . . - -............ . ....................... ........................ ...................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
omy ................... . . . . . . . . . ..................... ...................... ........................ ................-... ...................
i ac comu sis om recu cc43 OFFIClAL RECORD COPY uss m i i- m >
During a meeting on Septer6er 1,19F2 the st4ff discussed the modifications made to that date with PG4E. With respect to those modifications, PG4E stated that:
- 1. Most modifications flow from their Internal Technical Program and not the IDVP.
- 2. All modifications are to restore margins or to meet design criteria.
- 3. Nothing has been found which would have prevented a system, structure or component from performinn its intended safety function in the event of the postulated Hosgri earthquake.
Tht staff has amined no ificatio comple date and' as conclu ti that the are gen ally min nature; phwhile have no done a de iled eva uation o ea p we belt e that ha the nodt ations t been de, s
facility Id like have with tdod an unacceptable onsequen es. \ rthqua e without
Staff Evaluation of Recent Develoosents During recent months, a number of significant developments and findings have occurred which influenced our recomendations regarding the scope of the Phase 11 Program Plan as proposed.
For your reference, we have graphically summarized in l Figure 2 the functioning of Phase I of the !DYP, the functioning of Phase 11 of the IDVP, and various activities undertaken by PG8E and their relationship to the IDYP. The develoosents exanined by the staff were briefly discussed in our Septercer 24, 1982 memorandum to you ano are further discussed in enclosures to this renorandun. The developnents include:
- 1. IDYP Phase ! Results:
- a. The identification of a larger than originally expected number of errors or open itens (E015) from both the IDVP and the PGaE ITP as discussed above. A list.cf these errors and open itees were provided to you_ as attachmenp to the September 24,1982 memorandue.
- b. The issuance of eicht Interim Technical Reports (ITR),
as of October 5,1982, including ITR 1, which suggested i that the sample for the reverification program must be l expanded, and ITR 2, which identified deficiencies in l QA controls fcr certa 19 resign activities. The staff evaluations of ITRs 1 t'irough 5 are province in Enclosure 1. ,
N 5iefi 6 W W iDiF p %c w o anu ru i fimiur l ome> ..................... ................--. wthMs..acceetah).e..and..coNurs..w1th the .1DVR..a90reu h........--..-
snd reco m nastiens, sunnus) ..................... . ~ . . . - - - - - -..-~ ~ ~ ~ ~. -"~~~~~~~-- - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - - -~~~~~~~~~" -""-"-"-"-
omy .................... _ . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . ................... .................... ............ .. ...................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NRC FoRW 314 (10@) MCM me OFFICIAL RECORD COPY v o o.1,.i- a ,
1
(
. . i 4
m
- c. The results from an independent analyIts nerforved by the staff's contractor, Brookhaven National I.aboratory, raised a numer of seismic concerns regarding PG&E original seismic analysis of the containment annulus structure. BNt. developed a three dimensional vertical nodel and identified concerns regarding the distributed masses, modeling of joints, as-tuilt dimension variations, spectra-smoothing techniques, modeling of piping bends and calculated piping support forces used in PG4E's original analysis. These concerns were forwarded to TES for consideration of their generic implications by the 10VP. PG4E has indicated that a majority of these c'ancerns hao been separately identified by the 10VP and/or P6aE. The staff will i audit the 10VP resolution of these concerns. Enclosure '
2 provides additional discussion.
- d. Region V inspection of the ongoing activities identified
- a nutter of open inspection issues. These issues include verification that the seismic analysis
model adequately characterizes the seismic responses 1 of the Auxiliary Building, Intake Structure and i various equiprnent and components. Some of these issues had been previously identified by the IDVP. l These issues are being closed out by both Pegion V i and WRR personnel via their consideration in the in the ITP and 10YP. A sumary of these issues is provided in Enclosure 3.
l
- e. The ortoinal Phase ! IDVP proposed, and the NRC I accepted, to include a reevaluation of the Hosgri l analyses only. The remaining seisr.ic analyses {
will be examined by the IDVP in the Phase !! program.
The staff discussion of this action is provided in Enclosure 4.
- 2. IDYP Phase !! Results:
- a. Preliminar.y results from the P., F. Reecy Phase !!
QA audit indicated that there exist deficiencies in the QA c6ntrols of the PGAE design program and of certain of their contractors.
- b. The results from the PGl.E initiated OA audits of I their in-house design activities and their safety- 1 related service contractors are sumarized in Enclosure
- 5. The PG4E findinos are consistent with the oreliminary results fron the n. F. Peedy Dbase !! f.6 aucit (discussed in a. above). Region V attencad the
, '. c. t t !M. E di t ^ 4 t -ti g * ="hM 1"* + 1 y en,ce y ................... ..... ...... ..- ..a.w q1,t,d ,2,t e0A[,,,ss,1,f ,,r,t",1.e.e., A ,me,7sp,p, dup,,,d,,i,s c,u s,,s 1,n,9, _ , ,, , ,,,, ,, ,,,,
smun) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . ...-...~....... ................... ............ ....... ........................ ..................
Daft ) ***===*+=*a ~"""a*""**""" """*****"a* "
- a ~ a * " a" a** .m a . m m=* * ** a a m amm a n a na m a mc row m panacu cce OFFICIAL RECORD COPY um i -mi
55-
- the Region's coments en both of the4e' activities is provided as Eaclosure 6. The staff has also forwarded these coments to TES for their consideration in the 10VP, in particular with respect to the scope of the audit as corpared to the scope delineated in the NRR letter of Nove4er 19,1961.
- 3. PG&E Actions:
- a. The establishment by the PG4E/Bechtel Project Tean of a corrective action progran that includes a seismic reevaluation encompassing all safety-related i structures, systems, and components. The scope '
of the effort is discussee in rcre detail in Enclosure
- 7. The 10VP will audit and consider the results af the corrective action program.
- b. The completion of modifications, as necessary, to restore the "as-built' plant to the "as-designed" condition. A listing of modifications made tp date, and a listing of anticipated additional '
Mdifications, are included in Enclosure 8.
- c. The undertaking of a review, to determine the adequacy
' of the seismic evaluation originally done by Blume, called the Blume Internal Report (BIR). Specifically, i
the BIR includes an internal technical review, conducte.1 I
by Blume, of civil / structural wort performed with l particular attention to the work for the Hosgri i'
evaluation in the 1977-1978 time frame. The results of this review have been documented by Blume in
] a report and submitted to the staff in early October 1982.
- d. The recognition by PG&E that there is probably no step-wise distinction between pre-1978 and post.
1978 activities as was assured in the issuance of the Connission Orcer and tte MR t.etter of Neverter 19, 19D1.
- e. The decis109 hy PGAE to undertake a reevaluation i of construction QA proposed as part the IDVP.
j While PG8E has stated that they have no reason to l
ouestion the quality of construction, they also i
stattd that such a progran is needed to renove any doubts. The 10VP has recently submitted a progran plan for review of these activities. Region i Y has reviewed this oroposed progran and found it to t+ satisfactory and consistent with previous D,eaton V )
] reco w ndations.
1 omce) ......m. . - ... ...mm-....m.. n....m............ ...................... .................m .............m.
1 SumetAhet > . . . . . . . . . .. ......mm.... ...... .. . . . . . ...... .....m................ .................
l gmyy g . . . .. . mm .. . . .o .. .... m m . . . . . ...... . . . . . . . . ...................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l
{ me pom mie pompecu see OFFICIAL RECORD COPY m .. .
l
.- l 6-
- f. The decision by PGaE to undertake9a wikdown of as-built Safety-related structures, systees, and components to increase confidence that as-built conditions are identified and evaluated.
~
- g. The PGAE proposal for staged licensing is discussed in Enclosure 9. This proposal is to complete, prior to fuel loading, the redew, analysis, and modifications for those systems required for fuel load. The remainder of the systees will !
be examined subsequently. The staff has reviewed the PGAE proposal and concurs in their identification of systens with some additions to the "supportive" list of equipment.
4 IDVP/ITP Interface:
The IDYP has presented plans to include the results l of the expanded PG8E activities as inputs to the IDVP i progran. This proposal is included in the Figure 2 i flow chart.
I i
Proposed Phase 11 Program 1
With regard to the contractors for Phase !! of the IDVP, !
PGat has proposed to retain Teledyne Engineering Services j (TES) as the IDYP program manager. The principal subcontractors to Inc.TES (RTR), are andRobert Stone & L. Cloud Webster Associates Engineering Company (RLCA), (SWEC R. F. Reedy l.{
The staff has examined the financial independence of the Phase 11 contractors frori both PG&E and Bechtel in addition to the independence of individual ecoloyees assigned to the IDYP. The criteria used by the staff in its evaluation are the same as those used in the Phase ! evaluation. The staff also has reviewed the technical qualifications of the .
IDYP contractors. Enclosure 10 sumarizes the staff review I and our findings, oeterrnining that the contractors are !
technically qualified and are indepenoont.
The adeouacy of the Phase !! Prograr Plan was reviewed by the staff against the requirements of our November 19, 1981 letter. Enclosure 11 describes the proposed program and presents the staff findings on that program.
CONCLUSIONS: Pased on cur review of the proposed Diablo Canyon Phase 11 IDYP, the status and results of other ongoing activities, as discussed above, and consideration of coments of the intervening parties to this proceeding, we have reached the following conclusions:
orrm) ...........~.. -- ---
~ ~ ~ . . ~ . - ~ . . . .........-.~......... ...................... ..................... .....................
sum m e) . . . . . - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ --.- - . - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --.~~~~~~ ~~.~.-~~~ . . - . . . - ~ ~ ~ .
.-~~~~~~l mg . . . - . . - . . . . ~ . . . ~ . ~ . . .................. ........................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .....................
me.u m necu em OFFICIAL RECORD COPY u.va i n-m
l l
\-
- 1. With respect to the amount of reevaluation activities required prior to any decision regarding fuel-load / low-power, we have concluded that, in addition to the require-ments of the November 19, 1981 Order, review and evaluation efforts for Phase II activities shoJld be sufficiently complete to provide confidence that no major deficiencies exist. We therefore require that an interim report on Phase II, summarizing the IDYP conclusions and results to date, be submitted prior to the FL/LP decision.
We recognize that certain plant modifications will likely not be needed prior to fuel loading, and accordingly we conclude that selected modifications could be deferred until af ter fuel load. Similarly, we recognize that completion of the Phase !! program and other activities proposed by the IDVP and PGaE to provide additional assurance that the plant is b!:*lt in accordance with the application, need not be cocipleted prior to a fuel-load / low-power decision. Figure 3 summarizes the staff's proposal.
- 2. With respect to the competence of the contractors proposed by PG4E projcct to carry out the Independent Design Verification Program, we conclude that the necessary experience and technical skills are being provided.
- 3. With respect to the independence of the contractors proposed we conclude that the independence of the IDVP individuals are acceptable in view of those independence criteria provided in the Comission's February 1,1982 responses to Congressmen Dingell and Ottinger.
- 4. In recognition of the expanded PG4E Program, we believe it is appropriate that the ongoing 10VP alter its approach to include a ,arpling of all of PG&E's efforts to gain overall confidence in that reverification effort.
omer) . . . - - - - - - - ~ ~ - - - - - - ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ -
sunme) - - ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~~~ ~~~~- ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~-
om ) - - - - - -
l- - -
eme rom m om NRCW CCM OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usom im-me
l 1
)
s, )
v l RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Cemistion: l l
- 1. Approve the Phase II Program Plan and contractors as modtfled by the staff conclusions in Enclosure ,
- 11. l
- 2. Approve the redirection of the Phase I/ Phase 11 division to require that the Phase II review / evaluation efforts -
be sufficiently conpleted, as identified in Figure 3, prior to a fuel-load / low-power decision.
(SignediWilliam J. Ol@
William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations
Enclosures:
As stated 1
NOTE: Comission connents should be provided directly to the Office of the Secretary by c.o.b.
DL:LBf3\@ #3 OELD 8k/
Schierlit9(yt Kerrigan Cua, 10/)tf82 * *' p/M,, %y,9.rkt W-10h /82 . 1 2 C N DU"
_, /m il k .s ) MbF9 bdlO I A I&E 0D REGION:\ V o,,,c p T . . . .4"..............Q. . .N \..p
... .... 4 .....
NRR:
ED0
.u-o .....
8k R
{_ REngepen _
,RDeY
, oug_, ,D,,gnhut,, g og,,,_,, _ g ,,,_
.9/..jM. ._....._2,.........
,19z,ty,81,,,,,, ,1 ply,8,2,,...., ,,1g/,Ma,2... , .19zi,yza?......, 1pA g2.,,,,,,,, ,,19/uza,?.... ,
om>
me ronu sie tem meu one OFFIClAL RECORD COPY usam mi-ni.:
l l
l l
v
- 8-1
,Gffffp;ENDAY10!!5: That the Comission: l l
- 1. Approve the Phase II Prgram Plan and contractors as roodified by the staff conclusions in Knclosure 11.
1
- 2. Apyrove the redirection of the Pha$e I/ Phase !! division l To require that the Phase II review / evaluation efforts be sufficiently completed, as identified in Figure 3 ,
prior to a fuei-load / low-power dec1sion. l 1
Williata J. Dircks Fxecutive Director for Operations Fnclosures: .
As staterf l
90TE: Cc.nsission corrents should be provided directly to tho Office of the Secretarj by c.o.b. l p.
/ ~ ~~' g .... f ......_ . / ~~~~ .. /
e h(M M ('4j [7, b lN M
- OF M DJAG.ui (Qv4 Dest (,a VD4TcM'lM @ )
P_gn- E (2eqqm @ y , y j p g rt ._
l roe.IP.H.Euget.gg
~_ -
{Io/et/81 ~ "'
mm g, ep e - mm #
.