ML20203D457

From kanterella
Revision as of 00:11, 1 January 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 860519-23
ML20203D457
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/16/1986
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20203D454 List:
References
50-313-86-16, 50-368-86-16, NUDOCS 8607210221
Download: ML20203D457 (1)


Text

-

r . j e e APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Arkansas Power and Light Company Dockets: 50-313/86-16 Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO) 50-368/86-16 Licenses: DPR-51 -

NPF-6 During an NRC inspection conducted on May 19-23, 1986, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. The violation involved the failure to comply with technical specifications regarding the implementation and maintenance of '

procedures. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1985), the violation is listed below:

Failure to Implement Current Procedures ANO Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 6.10 and 6.11 respectively, require, in part, that " Procedures for personnel radiation protection' shall be ~repared p consistent with the requirements of 10-CFR Part 20 and shall be approved, maintained and adhered to for all operations involving personnel radiation exposure."

Contrary to the above, the NRC inspector determined on May 21, 1986, that an obsolete procedure was being used for the setup and operation of a personnel thermoluminescent dosimetry reader.

This is a Severity Level IV violation. -(Supplement I)-(313/8616-01 and 368/8616-01).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Arkansas Power & Light Company is hereby required to submit to this office within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation: (1) the reason for the violations if~ admitted, (2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Dated at Arlington, Texas this 16th day of July 1986 PDR ADOCK PDR G