|
---|
Category:AFFIDAVITS
MONTHYEARML20073B6731994-09-19019 September 1994 Affidavit of Cl Terry Re License Amend Request 94-015 ML20073B6951994-09-19019 September 1994 Affidavit of Cl Terry Authorizing Signing & Filing W/Nrc OL Amend Request 94-016 ML20128D6111993-01-26026 January 1993 Joint Affidavit of I Barnes & Ft Grubelich Re Borg-Warner Check Valves.* Discusses Issues Re Borg-Warner Check Valves Raised by Cfur & Adequacy of Actions Taken by TU Electric ML20127L9661993-01-26026 January 1993 Affidavit of Rl Pettis Re Borg-Warner Check Valves.* Statement of Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20127L9321993-01-26026 January 1993 Affidavit of Re Architzel Re Thermo-Lag Installation at Testing for Unit 2.* Statement of Prof Qualifications Encl ML20086Q3931991-12-26026 December 1991 Affidavit of Case President J Ellis.* Affidavit of Case President J Ellis Re Motion for Leave to File Response to Portions of Motion of R Micky & Dow to Reopen Record. W/Certificate of Svc ML20154G7841988-09-0909 September 1988 Affidavit of Jj Macktal Re Oppressive Terms of Settlement Agreement for Addl Safety Concerns.Related Info Encl ML20207E6061988-08-12012 August 1988 Affidavit of B Brink.* Discusses Concern Re Operation of Plant.W/Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc ML20207E5941988-08-0505 August 1988 Affidavit of K Mccook.* Discusses Concerns Re Operations of Plant.Unexecuted Affidavit of P Reznikoff Encl ML19325D6431988-07-12012 July 1988 Affidavit of B Brink.* Expresses Concern That Operation of Plant Will Cause Loss of Health to Author & Family & Safety Problems at Plant Will Jeopardize Life & Property ML19325D6461988-07-12012 July 1988 Affidavit of L Burnam.* Expresses Concern That Operation of Plant Will Cause Loss of Health to Author & Family & Safety Problems at Plant Will Jeopardize Life & Property.W/ Certificate of Svc ML19325D6401988-07-12012 July 1988 Affidavit of P Reznikoff.* Expresses Concern Re Danger to Health & Safety Posed by Normal Operations of Plant & by Possible Accidents ML20197E3011988-05-23023 May 1988 Affidavit of JW Muffett.* Encl Review Issues Lists (Rils) on Pipe Stress & Pipe Supports Document That All Issues Closed by Cygna.Job Responsibilities of JW Muffett Stated. W/O Rils.W/Certificate of Svc ML20154E5391988-05-13013 May 1988 Affidavit of Ha Levin.* Related Documentation Encl ML20154E5281988-05-0606 May 1988 Affidavit of RP Klause.* Discusses Design Validation & for Large & Small Bore Piping Supports at Plant During Preparation of Project Status Repts.Author Statement of Training & Experience Encl ML20196B0751988-02-0101 February 1988 Affidavit of Rd Pollard Re Environ Qualification of RG-59 Coaxial Cable ML20236X2501987-12-0202 December 1987 Affidavit of Dn Chapman.* Discusses Mgt Analysis Co Audit Rept ML20236E0481987-10-23023 October 1987 Affidavit of Bp Garde in Support of Motion for Reconsideration.* ML20236E7501987-07-23023 July 1987 Affidavit of Jt Merritt.* Affidavit Discusses Mgt Analysis Co Audit Repts.Related Correspondence ML20236E7411987-07-22022 July 1987 Affidavit of JB George.* Affidavit Discusses Mgt Analysis Co Audit Repts.Related Correspondence ML20236E7551987-07-22022 July 1987 Affidavit of Eg Gibson.* Affidavit Discusses Mgt Analysis Co Audit Rept.Related Correspondence ML20211D0591987-02-11011 February 1987 Affidavit of Eh Johnson.* Responds to Statements in Case Motion Re Trend Analyses or Trend Repts.Trend Analyses & Repts Incorporated Into SALP Repts in 1980.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20212E8631986-12-26026 December 1986 Affidavit of Case Witness J Doyle Re Case 861230 Partial Response to Applicants 861201 Response to Board Concerns.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20211J4721986-11-0101 November 1986 Affidavit of J Doyle Re Scope of Cygna Role.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20211J4141986-10-28028 October 1986 Affidavit of DC Garlington Re Irregularities in Plant Const or Operations Noticed During Site Visits.Emergency Lights Not Aimed & Locked & Trash in Diesel Room Noted in Monitoring Repts.W/Certificate of Svc ML20211J3551986-10-0303 October 1986 Affidavit of MD Nozette Re Events Concerning Participation as co-owner of Plant Between Nov 1984 & Feb 1985.Discusses Util Failure to Answer Questions Posed in Re Participation in Project ML20214L6911986-08-18018 August 1986 Affidavit of Tg Tyler Supporting Applicant Response to a Palmer Affidavit Re Case 860731 Response to Applicant 860716 Motion for Protective Order & Motion to Compel.W/ Certificate of Svc ML20214M4271986-08-0505 August 1986 Joint Affidavit of D Lurie & E Marinos Clarifying 860404 Joint Affidavit on Statistical Inferences from Comanche Peak Review Team Sampling ML20207E3071986-07-16016 July 1986 Affidavit of Le Powell on 860716 Re Estimate of Time & Effort Required to Prepare Responses to Questions 4-7 of M Gregory Set One Discovery Requests.Related Correspondence ML20207F7741986-07-16016 July 1986 Affidavit of Le Powell Re Discovery in CP Extension Proceeding.W/Certificate of Svc ML20197C1301986-05-0606 May 1986 Affidavit of M Walsh,Advising That Statistical Sampling Being Performed & Proposed for Facility Inappropriate. Applicant Reliance on Statistical Sample Will Not Identify Problems W/Pipe Supports.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20197C1051986-04-26026 April 1986 Affidavit of J Doyle,Addressing Applicability of Statistical Sampling to Facility ML20155A6851986-04-0404 April 1986 Joint Affidavit of D Lurie & E Marinos Re Board Concerns on Statistical Inferences from Comanche Peak Review Team Sampling.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20138B1711986-03-13013 March 1986 Affidavit of SD Mckay Re Likelihood of Reactor Coolant Pump Restart Due to Operator Error W/No Occurrence of Inadequate Cooling Event.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20138B1071986-03-12012 March 1986 Affidavit of CE Mccracken Re Core Flow Blockage Due to Fine Paint Particles ML20138B1431986-03-12012 March 1986 Affidavit of B Mann Re Treatment of Operator Error in Licensing Process & Likelihood of Reactor Coolant Pump Restart During Inadequate Core Cooling Event.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20215E7171986-01-27027 January 1986 Partially Withheld Affidavit Re Allegations Concerning Drug Use & Distribution ML20138P5551985-12-14014 December 1985 Affidavit of Jj Doyle in Response to Applicant Changes to 1984 Motions for Summary Disposition ML20137X1831985-12-0505 December 1985 Affidavit of R Mcgrane Re Knowledge of Mgt Analysis Corp Rept & Issues Raised by Rept.Author Admits Only Recent Awareness of Rept.Related Correspondence ML20137X0201985-12-0505 December 1985 Affidavit of Dh Wade Re Knowledge of Mgt Analysis Corp Rept & Issues Raised by Rept.Author Admits No Knowledge of Rept Prior to May or June 1985.Related Correspondence ML20137W9971985-12-0404 December 1985 Affidavit of Nh Williams Re Knowledge of Mgt Analysis Corp Rept & Issues Raised by Rept.Author Admits No Knowledge of Rept Prior to 850625.Related Correspondence ML20137X2101985-12-0303 December 1985 Affidavit of R Siever Re Knowledge of Mgt Analysis Corp Rept & Issues Raised by Rept.Author Admits Awareness of Audit & Rept Preparation Through General Onsite Conversation in 1985.Related Correspondence ML20137X0881985-12-0202 December 1985 Affidavit of Rc Iotti Re Knowledge of Mgt Analysis Corp Rept & Issues Raised by Rept.Author Admits No Knowledge Apart from News Publicity & ASLB Documents in mid-1985.Related Correspondence ML20137X1291985-12-0202 December 1985 Affidavit of G Krishnan Re Knowledge of Mgt Analysis Corp Rept & Issues Raised by Rept.Author Admits General Awareness of Discovery Process Re 1980 Licensing Proceedings.Related Correspondence ML20137X0601985-12-0202 December 1985 Affidavit of Jc Finneran Re Knowledge of Mgt Analysis Corp Rept & Issues Raised by Rept.Author Admits No Knowledge Apart from News Publicity & General Onsite Conversations Earlier in 1985.Related Correspondence ML20137X1611985-12-0202 December 1985 Affidavit of P Chang Re Knowledge of Mgt Analysis Corp Rept & Issues Raised by Rept.Author Admits No Knowledge of Rept Prior to mid-1985.Related Correspondence ML20205H4071985-11-12012 November 1985 Affidavit of Rc Iotti & Jc Finneran Re Corrections & Clarifications to Affidavits Supporting Motions for Summary Disposition of Pipe Support Design Allegations. Supporting Documentation Encl.Related Correspondence ML20205H3501985-11-12012 November 1985 Affidavit of Rc Iotti & Jc Finneran in Response to ASLB Request for Info Re Variation of Field Configurations of Pipe Supports Utilizing clinched-down U-bolts.Related Correspondence ML20133F8221985-09-0909 September 1985 Affidavit of Aw Serkiz Providing Explanation Re Sser 9, App L,Per ASLB 850918 Memorandum.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20133F8161985-09-0909 September 1985 Affidavit of CE Mccracken Providing Further Explanation of Background of Sser 9,App L,Per ASLB 850918 Memorandum 1994-09-19
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20196G4021999-06-18018 June 1999 Comment on FRN Re Rev of NRC Enforcement Policy NUREG-1600, Rev 1 & Amend of 10CFR55.49.Concurs with Need to Provide Examples That May Be Used as Guidance in Determining Appropriate Severity Level for Violations as Listed ML20206H1881999-05-0606 May 1999 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App K Re ECCS Evaluation Models. Commission Grants Licensee Exemption ML20206M5111999-04-30030 April 1999 Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-1083 Re Content of UFSAR IAW 10CFR50.71(e). Recommends That Listed Approach Be Adopted for Changes to Documents Incorporated by Ref CY-99-007, Comment Supporting Proposed Changes to Improve Insp & Assessment Processes for Overseeing Commercial Nuclear Industry That Were Published in Fr on 990122 & in SECY-99-0071999-02-22022 February 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Changes to Improve Insp & Assessment Processes for Overseeing Commercial Nuclear Industry That Were Published in Fr on 990122 & in SECY-99-007 TXX-9825, Comment Endorsing NEI Comments on Proposed Rulemaking to 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness at Npps1998-12-14014 December 1998 Comment Endorsing NEI Comments on Proposed Rulemaking to 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness at Npps ML20154C4101998-09-30030 September 1998 Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors.Comanche Peak Electric Station Endorses NEI Comment Ltr & Agrees with NEI Recommendations & Rationale ML20216E1051998-04-0707 April 1998 Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-1029 Titled Guidelines for Evaluating Electromagnetic & Radio-Frequency Interference in Safety-related Instrumentation & Control Sys ML20217H3611998-03-26026 March 1998 Comment Opposing Draft GL 97-XX, Lab Testing of Nuclear Grade Charcoal, Issued on 980225.Advises That There Will Be Addl Implementation Costs ML20198Q4851998-01-16016 January 1998 Comment Opposing PRM 50-63A by P Crane That Requests NRC Amend Regulations Re Emergency Planning to Require Consideration of Sheltering,Evacuation & Prophylactic Use of Potassium Iodide for General Public ML20211A4871997-09-12012 September 1997 Changes Submittal Date of Response to NRC RAI Re Proposed CPSES risk-informed Inservice Testing Program & Comments on NRC Draft PRA Documents ML20149L0311997-07-21021 July 1997 Comment on Draft Guides DG-1048,DG-1049 & DG-1050.Error Identified in Last Line of DG-1050,item 1.3 of Section Value/Impact Statement.Rev 30 Should Be Rev 11 ML20140A4871997-05-27027 May 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule Re Safety Conscious Work Environ.Util Agrees W/Nuclear Energy Inst Comment Ltr ML20133G5411996-12-0505 December 1996 Transcript of 961205 Meeting in Arlington,Tx Re Comanche Peak Thermo-Lag Fire Barriers. Pp 1-111 ML20135B7881996-11-29029 November 1996 Order Approving Corporate Restructuring of TU to Facilitate Acquistion of Enserch Corp ML20128M8011996-10-0303 October 1996 Comment Opposing Proposed NRC Generic Communication, Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism & Other Vessel Head Penetrations ML20097D7321996-02-0909 February 1996 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-63 Re CPSES Request for Amend to Its Regulations Dealing W/Emergency Planning to Include Requirement That Emergency Planning Protective Actions for General Public Include Listed Info ML20094Q6421995-11-28028 November 1995 Comment Supporting Petition for RM PRM-50-62 Re Amend to Regulation Re QAPs Permitting NPP Licensees to Change Quality Program Described in SAR W/O NRC Prior Approval If Changes Do Not Potentially Degrade Safety or Change TSs ML20094H4801995-11-0808 November 1995 Comment Supporting Nuclear Energy Inst Comments on Proposed Rules 10CFR60,72,73 & 75 Re Safeguards for Spent Nuclear Fuel or high-level Radwaste ML20091M6441995-08-25025 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule Re Review of Revised NRC SALP Program.Believes That NRC Should Reconsider Need for Ipap or SALP in Light of Redundancy ML20086M7921995-07-0707 July 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed GL Process for Changes to Security Plan Without Prior NRC Approval ML20084A0181995-05-19019 May 1995 Comment Suporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Containment Leakage Testing.Supports NEI Comments ML20077M7311994-12-30030 December 1994 Comments Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low Power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20077L8711994-12-22022 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50,55 & 73 Re Reduction of Reporting Requirements Imposed on NRC Licensees ML20073B6731994-09-19019 September 1994 Affidavit of Cl Terry Re License Amend Request 94-015 ML20073B6951994-09-19019 September 1994 Affidavit of Cl Terry Authorizing Signing & Filing W/Nrc OL Amend Request 94-016 ML20058E0561993-11-10010 November 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule Re Staff Meetings Open to Public. Believes That NRC Has Done Well in Commitment to Provide Public W/Fullest Practical Access to Its Activities ML20056G3351993-08-27027 August 1993 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Review of 10CFR2.206 Process ML20045D8321993-06-11011 June 1993 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 54, FSAR Update Submittals. ML20044F3271993-05-21021 May 1993 Comments on Draft NRC Insp Procedure 38703, Commercial Grade Procurement Insp, Fr Vol 58,Number 52.NRC Should Use EPRI Definitions for Critical Characteristics ML20056C0831993-03-19019 March 1993 Texas Utils Electric Co Response to Petitioners Motion to Stay Issuance of Full Power License.* Licensee Urges NRC to Reject Petitioners Motion & to Deny Petitioners Appeal of 921215 Order.Motion Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20056C1881993-03-17017 March 1993 Order.* Directs Util to Respond to Motion by COB 930319 & NRC to Respond by COB 930322.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930317 ML20128D9651993-02-0303 February 1993 Memorandum & Order.* Stay Request Filed by Petitioners Denied.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930203 ML20128F6221993-02-0303 February 1993 Transcript of 930203 Affirmation/Discussion & Vote Public Meeting in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-2.Related Info Encl ML20128D3391993-02-0202 February 1993 Emergency Motion to Stay Issuance of low-power Ol.* Petitioners Specific Requests Listed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128D4651993-02-0202 February 1993 Texas Utils Electric Co Response to Emergency Motion to Stay Issuance of low-power Ol.* Petitioner Request Should Be Denied Based on Failure to Meet Heavy Burden Imposed on Party.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128D3461993-01-29029 January 1993 NRC Staff Notification of Issuance of OL for Facility.* Low Power License May Be Issued by 930201.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128D6321993-01-29029 January 1993 Memorandum & Order.* Denies Citizens for Fair Util Regulation for Fr Notice Hearing on Proposed Issuance of OL for Facility.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930129 ML20127L9321993-01-26026 January 1993 Affidavit of Re Architzel Re Thermo-Lag Installation at Testing for Unit 2.* Statement of Prof Qualifications Encl ML20128D6111993-01-26026 January 1993 Joint Affidavit of I Barnes & Ft Grubelich Re Borg-Warner Check Valves.* Discusses Issues Re Borg-Warner Check Valves Raised by Cfur & Adequacy of Actions Taken by TU Electric ML20127L9181993-01-26026 January 1993 NRC Staff Reply to Cfur Request for Publication of Proposed Action Re Licensing of Unit 2.* Cfur Request That Notice Re Licensing of Unit 2 Be Published Permitting Parties to Request Hearings Should Be Denied ML20127L9661993-01-26026 January 1993 Affidavit of Rl Pettis Re Borg-Warner Check Valves.* Statement of Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20127L9091993-01-25025 January 1993 Tx Util Electric Response to Citizens for Fair Util Regulation Request of 930113.* Request Fails to Raise Worthy Issue & Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127L8891993-01-21021 January 1993 Order.* License Should File Response to Citizens for Fair Util Regulation Ltr Requesting That Commission Issue Fr Notice Providing for Opportunity for Hearing Re Issuance of OL by 930125.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930122 ML20127G9191993-01-19019 January 1993 Order.* Grants Petitioners Extension of Time Until 930122 to File Brief.Replies to Petitioners Brief Shall Be Filed on or Before 930208.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930119 ML20127G9441993-01-19019 January 1993 TU Electric Brief in Opposition to Petitioners Appeal of ASLB Memorandum & Order.* Requests That Petitioners Appeal Be Denied & Licensing Board 921215 Memorandum & Order Be Affirmed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127G8041993-01-15015 January 1993 NRC Staff Response to Appeal of Licensing Board Decision Denying Petition for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing Filed by Bi & Di Orr.* Board 921215 Decision Should Be Upheld.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20127G7451993-01-14014 January 1993 NRC Staff Response to Motion of Petitioners RM Dow & SL Dow, (Disposable Workers of Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station),For Leave to File Out of Time & Request for Extension of Time to File Brief.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20127G7941993-01-12012 January 1993 Opposition of TU Electric to Motion for Leave to File Out of Time & Request for Extension of Time to File Brief by SL Dow (Disposable Workers of Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station) & RM Dow.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20127A5931993-01-0808 January 1993 Brief in Support of Petitioner Notice of Appeal.Aslb Erred by Not Admitting Petitioner Contention & Action Should Be Reversed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127A6371993-01-0707 January 1993 Notice of Appeal.* Appeal Submitted Due to 921215 Memo Denying Petitioner Motion for Rehearing & Petition for Intervention & Request for Hearings.Proceedings Were Terminated by Aslb.W/Certificate of Svc 1999-06-18
[Table view] |
Text
c Attaclunnt 1 00CKETED Ul!MC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA '84 $g) 14 pg '7g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD E7 ;
'In the Matter of )
)
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC ) Docket Nos. 50-445-2 and COMPANY,~et _al. ) 30-446-2
)
(Comanche Peak Steam Electric ) (Application for Station, Units 1 and 2) ) Operating Licenses)
-AFFIDAVIT OF ANTONIO VEGA CONCERNING E BOARD QUESTIONS REGARDING QA/QC OVERSIGHT My name is Antonio Vega. My business address is comanche i
Peak Steam Electric Station-("CPSES"), P. O. Box 1002, Glen Rose, Texas 76043. I am the Site QA Manager for - the design, construction and startup testing of CPSES. In that capacity, I am responsible for establishing and directing a Quality Assurance /
Quality Control program on safety-related activities to assure that the plant is safe, reliable and in compliance with regulatory requirements. A statement of my educational and professional qualifications is attached to the affidavit (Attachment A).
-The purpose of this Affidavit is to respond to the Licensing
-Board's request for additional information concerning the status of QA/QC oversight activities on systems that may be called upon to function during fuel loading and precritical testing to protect public health and safety. The Board stated that at least four systems were included in this category, i.e., (1) boron addition and monitoring equipment, (2) reactor monitoring equipment, (3) 9409170438 840913 PDR ADOCK 05000445 g PM
fuel 1 1oading equipment, and (4) reactor. protection systems.
Specifically, the Board requested " evidence concerning the current status of QA/QC oversight of~these systems, including evidence that documentation is adequate to assure that unsatisfactory or non-conforming conditions have been corrected and evidence concerning whether or not there are.' allegations known to the applicants or Staff about the intimidation of QA/QC personnel who l
were working on these systems." -Licensing Board's " Memorandum (RequestEfor Evidence Relevant to Fuel Loading)" (August 24, 1984) at p. 2.
In response to the Board's request, an evaluation of all plant systems was conducted to determine the systems that fell into the category specified by the Board, as.noted>above. Ten
- systems / equipment groupings were identified. These systems are listed in Attachment B. With regard to these systems, a thorough review was conducted to determine if all required inspections had been conducted and verified, as applicable. This review reflected that QC inspections have been performed.and documented on the necessary mechanical, electrical and instrumentation components of i these systems. These inspections include in-process inspections, i
' final. inspections, as-built verification inspections, and Authorized Nuclear. Inspector (ANI) inspections, as applicable.
i Continuing reinspections will be made as appropriate to preserve the integrity of completed inspections.
i 6
In addition, an extensive testing program on these systems has ~ been implemented and will be completed prior to fuel load, including, as applicable, hydrostatic tests on pressure retaining systems, prerequisite testing on components to assure proper component. functional operability, and preoperational testing to assure proper operation as a system. Preoperational testing provides assurance that the systems in question will operate as designed by requiring demonstration testing of the capability of the systems to meet safety-related performance requirements. A summary of the preoperational testing for each of the ten systems in question is set forth in Attachment C.
Conditions found to be unsatisfactory or non-conforming as a result of the**above QA/QC oversight activities have been documented, as appropriate, on Non-conformance Reports, Inspection Reports, Test-Deficiency Reports or in other prescribed manners.
These methods of documentation assure positive control and tracking of such conditions to preclude inadvertent use of defective materials, components or systems. These unsatisfactory or non-conforming items are included in a computerized tracking system which is developed and administered by the TUGCo Startup organization to assure outstanding items are properly prioritized, assigned, and resolved in a timely manner.
The Startup tracking system was reviewed to assess the status of items, identified as unsatisfactory or non-conforming through QA/QC inspections or surveillances of construction and testing
activities, on the ten systems identified in Attachment B. The review reflected that all such outstanding items are scheduled to be completed prior ' to fuel load.
In conclusion, based on the thorough review of QA/QC oversight status described above for the.affected systems, I have ;
determined that necessary and appropriate QA/QC activities have been conducted and that non-conforming conditions are identified and tracked, as applicable, and are scheduled to be resolved prior to fuel load. Our evaluation reflects that outstanding items will be completed on a schedule to support fuel load and precri'ical Ltesting activities in a -manner which assures the health and safety of the public.
I turn now to the Board's second question regarding the status'of QA/QC oversight (i.e., whether or not there
'are allegations about intimidation of QA/QC personnel who were working on these systems). I have discussed this issue with appropriate personnel in my QC organization, construc- ,
tion and QA/QC for operations. I also have personally reviewed the Quality Assurance Investigation Files, and have had cognizant individuals review allegations made through the QA Hot-line and transmitted to us by the NRC Staff. I also instructed our counsel to review the record compiled on the
_ ,, , , - _ . . - . . , _ . - - _.-_._,,-...w _,_,_....,,._7,,. . . _ , , , ..,,,_.._,-,__,,_m,..,,-__ ,___,,.r#.,_. ..m.m. ,.m._, ,
F intimidation issue before the Board. Based on these discussions and reviews, I am not aware of any specific allegation about intimidation of QA/QC personnel related to any of the systems set forth in Attachment B.
L A
" ' Antonio Vega gll7 County of jmdr )
)
State of Texas )
Subscribed and sworn to before me this Djkday of September, 1.984.
< /Lauf> n.e) n &
' Notary Public(
ATTACKHENT A ANTONIO VEGA, P.E.
STATEMENT OF EDUCATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE POSITION: TUGCo Site Quality Assurance Manager FORMAL EDUCATION: 1961-1967, B.S. Electrical Engineering, University of Texas EXPERIENCE:
03/16/84-Present Texas Utilities Generating Company (TUGCo), Comanche Peak S.E.S., Glen Rose, Texas, as TUGCo Site QA Manager. This includes responsibility
.for establishing and directing site QA/QC activities on safety-related components and systems to ensure CPSES is constructed as a safe, reliable plant, in full compliance with all applicable requirements.
-1977-03/15/84 Texas Utilities Generating Company (TUGCo), Dallas, Texas, as Quality Assurance Services Supervisor, Quality Assurance Division. Activities include program and procedure development, and independent compliance evaluation via surveillance and audit of safety-related activities performed by TUGCo, Texas Utilities Services Incorporated (TUSI), the Architect Engineer, the Constructor and safety-related equipment buppliers.
1973-1977 Texas Utilities Services Incorporated, Dallas, Texas, as Quality Assurance Senior Engineer, Quality Assurance Division. Activities included involvement in developing the QA program, procedures, instructions, and conducting audits and inspections on TUSI, the Architect Engineer, the Constructor, and safety-related equipment suppliers.
1970-1973 Dallas Power & Light Company, Dallas, Texas, Power Plant Design Engineer, Power Plant Division, Engineering Department. Activities included conceptual and detail design of power plant power and distribution systems, protection systems and communication systems.
Performed and related construction inspections.
'1967-1970 Dallas Power & Light Company, Dallas, Texas, as System Protection and Controls Engineer, System Protection Section, Substation and Transmission Division, Engineering Department. Activities included conceptual and detail design of substation, transmission, and switchyard facilities, including power systems and communication systems. Performed related construction inspections.
ATTACHMENT B SYSTEMS INVOLVING CONTESTED ACTIVITIES Boron Addition and Monitoring
- 1. Process Sampling Systam
- 2. Chemical and Volume Control System and Refueling Water Storage Tank
- 3. Reactor Coolant System
- 4. Residual Heat Removal Reactor Monitoring
- 1. -Nuclear Instrumentation Fuel Loading Equipment
- 1. Fuel Handling and Vessel Servicing Equipment
- 2. . Cranes and Hoists Reactor Protection System
- 1. Reactor Protection System
- 2. Analog Control System
- 3. Rod Control Equipment a.
- ._ _ _ - . - _ _ - . . - - , -_. ~
Attcchment C ;
Pcg2 1-
[* V PREOPERATIONAL TEST SUMMARIES ;
A. PROCESS SAMPLING SYSTEM -
This test demonstrated the capability of the Process Sample System to provide liquid and gas samples from designated system sample locations, f including the Reactor Coolant System. The test also demonstrated the ;
proper operation of the Process Sample System isolation valves, including response ~to engineered safety signals within the required time, i
B., CHEMICAL AND VOLUME CONTROL SYSTEM This testing demonstrated the proper operational capabilities of all of the various portions of the Chemical and Volume Control System, including letdown, charging, and seal water injection to maintain the charging and letdown flows, the seal water injection flow to the Reactor Coolant pumps
- and to provide domineralizer and filter cleaning of letdown water, chemical control, purification, and makeup of the Reactor Coolant System, and boron' P
thermal regeneration for boron concentration control of the Reactor Coolant System. Alternate flow paths for charging and miniflow, response to safety injection signals emergency boration, and redundancy of the boration dilution were also demonstrated. Testing also demonstrated the proper operation of the Boron Dilution Protection Systems to mitigate an inadvertent dilution of the Reactor Coolant System.
k I
Attcchment C Pcg] 2 C. REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM The testing performed on the Reactor Coolant System verified the piping system integrity and component ability to function properly at various plant conditions extending from static ambient conditions to normal plant operating temperatures and pressures. The testing included a system hydrostatic test, safety and relief valve operation and leakage verification, reactor coolant pump control circuit operability, pressurizer heater and spray valve operation, pressurizer pressure and level control system operability, and integrated plant hot functional test, and measurement of thermal expansion of various systems at normal plant operating temperatures.
D. RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEM The testing on the Residual Heat Removal System demonstrated component control and interlock functions, including response to engineered safety actuation signals, pump hydraulic performance and system hydraulic performance during the heatup and cooldown periods of the Hot Functional Testing. ,
E. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTATION This testing verified that the Nuclear Instrumentation System is capable of providing indication of signals, including appropriate power levels, generating trip functions when trip functions are bypassed, blocked, or other than normal. Included in the testing on the system was veriftention of the Flux Doubling Circuitry which is an integral part of the Baron Dilution Protection System.
Attcchment C p g3 3 l
F. FUEL HANDLING AND VESSEL SERVICING EQUIPMENT !
This testing' demonstrated the proper operation of all equipment used in fuel handling, access to fuel storage and core locations,'and equipment l used to service the reactor vessel, including lifting of the reactor vessel head, reactor vessel internals.. stud tensioners and tensioner hoists. j f
l-I G. FUEL HANDLING EQUIPMENT CRANES AND HOISTS l
This testing demonstrated the proper operation of the cranes used in fuel r movement. These tests include control and interlock functions, speed and travel movements and the required load testing.
The testing of the Reactor Protection System demonstrated the ability of i
the system logic to respond properly to various plant parameters and i provide the correct engineered safety actuation signal, that the engineered i
?
safety feature components are directly actuated or saquenced, the proper operation of the Turbine Runback Controls, the required engineering safety. i features response time, and that the Technical Specification f instrumentation _setpoints are properly adjusted.
- I. ANALOC CONTROL SYSTEM f There is no specific test for the Analog Control System. The components [
within the Analog Control System were tested within the scope of the specific system preoperational tests.
r
, 1--__. - - . . _ _ - . . - . - - . . _ . _ _ . _ ~ .
Att :hme t C Pcg3 4
- J. ROD CONTROL SYSTEM There is no preoperational test specified for the Rod Control System
.g. because the system cannot be tested effectively in operational conditions until fuel is. loaded. This systes will be tested post-fuel load under the Initial Startup Program.
i e !
L r
L l
f I
(
P I
l
[