ML20083A315

From kanterella
Revision as of 10:24, 19 April 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 2 to Procedure 1040-001-007, Feedwater Sys
ML20083A315
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 11/02/1983
From:
TOLEDO EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17150A231 List:
References
1040-001-007, 1040-1-7, IEB-79-01B, IEB-79-1B, NUDOCS 8312200250
Download: ML20083A315 (31)


Text

I l

CALCULATION / PROBLEM COVER SHEET i

Calculation / Problem No: 1040-001-007 i Title. Feedwater System 2.4

~

Clientpoledo Edison Company Project: Davis-Besse Unit 1 Job No: 1040-001-671 I & E Bulletin 79-01B Equipment Qualification Dreign input /Reforences:

Design Inputs are outlined in the Cover Report.

Ascumptions:

Assumptions are outlined in the Cover Report.

MIthod:

I I Methods are outlined in the Cover Report.

l l

R: marks:

EDS Nuclear Report No. 02-1040-1076. , ,

REV. NO. REVISION APPROVED DATE D 0 KO ?_ .

&G4 M IO *E 'S~

? h[A'[ff]l M A b t.//Id. ll/5 /Ofj 5 // . At i kfu Nh I y 8312200250 831129 PDR ADOCK 05000346 i ses ooos srs

/ /

O R R

, Fccilith.~'DLvie-Basae Unit 1 -

MASTEL'w2ST Ind3x N3'g' '4M-001 Dockat: 50-346 HARSH ENVIRONMENT Rev.: 2 l

FEEDWATER SYSTEM Prepared by: y N _ Date: // /

Checked by: '

Date: //MA//3 I l l l l LOCATION l l l l l l l Inside l Outside l l l Worksheet l l Plant l l Primary l Primary [ I l Index No. l Rev. lID Number 1 Generic Name l Containment I Containment 1. REMARKS I I l l l l l l l l 204H-005 l 0 lLTSP9A3 l Level Transmitter l Rm. 218 l l l l 204H-005 1 2 lLTSP9A3 l Level Transmitter l Rm. 218 l l l l 204H-006 l 0 lLTSP9A4 l Level Transmitter i Rm. 218 l l l l 204H-006 l 2 lLTSP9A4 l Level Transmitter l Rm. 218 l l l l 204H-007 l 0 lLTSP9B3 l Level Transmitter l Rm. 216 l l , I l 204H-007 l 2 lLTSP9B3 l Level Transmitter l Rm. 216 i l l i l 204H-008 l 0 lLTSP9B4 i Level Transmitter l Rm. 216 l l l l 204H-008 l 2 l LTSP984 l Level Transmitter l Rm. 216 l l l l 204H-009 l 2 lMV05990 l Valve Motor Operator l l Rm. 314 l l l 204H-010 l 2 lMV06010 l Valve Motor Operator l l Rm. 314 l l l 204H-Oll l 2 lMV06080 l Valve Motor Operator l l Rm. 303 l l l 204H-012 l 2 lMV06120 l Valve Motor Operator l l Rm. 303 l l l 204H-013 l 2 lMV13830 l Valve Motor Operator l l Rm. 303 l l l l 2 IBEllC l Motor Control Center l l Rm. 304 i See 2.21 l l l 2 lBEllD l Motor Control Center l l Rm. 227 l See 2.21 l l l 2 IBFilA l Motor Control Center i I Rm. 427 l See 2.21 l l l 2 lBFilC l Motor Control Center l l Rm. 236 l See 2.21 l l l 2 lBFilD l Motor Control Center l l Rm. 227 l See 2.21 l l l 2 lCDEllC l Disconnect Switch Cabinet l l Rm. 304 l See 2.21 l l l 2 lCDEllD l Disconnect Switch Cabinet l l Rm. 227 l See 2.21 l l l 2 l CDFil A-2 l Disconnect Switch Cabinet l l Rm. 427 l See 2.21 l l l 2 lCDFilC l Disconnect Switch CeSinet l l Rm. 236 l See 2.21 l l l 2 lCDYE2 l Disconnect Switch Cabinet l l Rm. 304 l See 2.21 l l l 2 lCDYP2 l Disconnect Switch Cabinet I l, Rm. 427 l See 2.21 l l l 2 lEV05990 l Terminal Block Box 1 l Rm. 314 l See 2.21 l l l 2 lEV06010 i Terminal Block Box l l Rm. 314 l See 2.21 l l l 2 lEV06080 l Terminal Block Box l l Rm. 303 l See 2.21 l l l 2 lEV06120 l Terminal Block Box l l Rm. 303 l See 2.21 l l l 2 lEV13830 l Terminal Block Box 1 I Rm. 236 l See 2.21 l l l 2 lJT3606 l Terminal Block Box l l Rm. 303 l See 2.21 l l l 2 lJT3802 l Terminal Block Box l l Rm. 314 l See 2.21 l l l 2 lNV13830 l Push Button Switch l l Rm. 236 l See 2.21 l l l l l l l l l

[

FaciliODavis-B:ssa Docket: 50-346 Unit 1 MASTE._ J T NON-HARSH ENVIRONMENT Index No R:v.: 2 4M-002 Prepared by: Date: [

Checked by: o r, *,,, , , . Lm ;/ Date: '.>./>,

I I l l LOCATION l l I

l l 1- l l Inside l' Outside l l l Worksheet l l Plant l l Primary l Primary l l l Index No. I Rev. IID Number l Generic Name l Containment l Containment l REMARKS l l l l l l l l l l '

l l 0 l belle l Motor Control Center l l Rm. 402 l l l l 0 l BE12A l Motor Control Center l l Rm. 429 l l l l 0 IBE12E I Motor Control Center l l Rm. 100 l l l l 0 lBF11E l Motor Control Center l l Rm. 100 l l l l 0 lBF12A l Motor Control Center l l Rm. 428 l l l l 0 lBF12B l Motor Control Center l l Rm. 319 l l l l 0 lC3630 l Auxiliary Shutdown Panel l l Rm. 324 l l l l 0 105706 l Console Cabinet l l Rm. 505 l l l l 0 lC5709 l Console Cabinet l l Rm. 505 l l l l 0 lC5712 l Console Cabinet l l Rm. 505 l l ,

I l 0 lC5717 l Eng. Safety Feature Act. Panel l l Rm. 505 l l l l l 0 lC5721 l Feedwater Cabinet l l Rm. 505 l l l 0 lC5762A l Control Cabinet l l Rm. 505 l l l 0 lC5792 l Control Cabinet l l Rm. 505 l l l 0 lCDE11 E l Discnnnect Switch Cabinet l l Rm. 402 l l l

l l 0 lCDE12A-1 l Disconnect Switch Cabinet l l Rm. 429 l l l l 0 lCDF12A-1 l Disconnect Switch Cabinet l l Rm. 428 l l l

l l 0 IC0F12A-2 l Disconnect Switch Cabinet l l Rm. 428 l l l l 0 lCDF128 l Disconnect Switch Cabinet l l Rm. 319 l l l l 0 lD1 l DC Motor Control Center 125/250V l l Rm. 429 l l l 0 l DIP l Distribution Panel l l Rm. 429 l l l

l 1 0 102 l DC Motor Control Center 125/250V l l Rm. 428 l l

O lD2P l Distribution Panel l l Rm. 428 l l l

l l 0 lEV03600 l Teminal Block Box l l Rm. 237 l l l 0 lEV03880 l Terminal Block Box l l Rm. 238 l l l

l l 0 lEV13820 1 Terminal Block Box l l Rm. 237 l l l l 0 lEV38690 l Terminal Block Box l l Rm. 237 l l l l 0 lEV38/20 l Terminal Block Box l l Rm. 238 l l l l 0 lMV03600 l Valve Motor Operator l l Rm. 237 l l l l 0 lMV03880 l Valve Motor Operator l l Rm. 238 l 0 lMV07860 l Valve Motor Operator l Rm. 237 l

l l l l l l l

- x

( ') ( )

Facility.sDavis-Bess 2 Unit 1 MASTri JT Index N -003 Docket: 50-346 NON-HARSH ENVIRONMENT Rev.: 2 FEEDWATER SYSTEM Prepared by: Date: ff Checked by: , A ; , , _'r,s j, ' Date: - -

l l l l l LOCATION l l I l l l 1 Inside Outside I l l Worksheet l l Plant l l Primary Primary l l l Index No. I Rev. IID Number l Generic Name l Containment l Containment l REMARKS l l l l l l l l l l l 0 lMV07900 l Valve Motor Operator l l Rm. 238 l l l 10 lMV13820 l Valve Motor Operator l l Rm. 237 l l l l 0 lMV38690 l Valve Motor Operator l l Rm. 237 l l l l 0 lMV38700 l Valve Motor Operator l l Rm. 237 l l l l 0 lMV38710 l Valve Motor Operator l l Rm. 238 l l l l 0 lMV38720 l Valve Motor Operator l l Rm. 238 l l l l 0 INV03600 l Push Button Switch l l Rm. 237 l l l l 0 lNV03880 l Push Button Switch l l Rm. 238 l l l l 0 lNV07860 l Push Button SwitEh l l Rm. 237 l l l l 0 lNV07900 l Push Button Switch l l Rm. 238 l l l l 0 lNV13820 i Push Button Switch l l Rm. 237 l l l l 0 lPSL4928A l Pressure Switch l l Rm. 237 l l l l 0 lPSL4928B l Pressure Switch I Rm. 237 l l l l 0 lPSL4929A l Pressure Switch l Rm. 238 l l l l 0 lPSL4929B l Pressure Switch l l Rm. 238 l l l l 0 lSE815 l Speed Sensing Device l l Rm. 237 l l l l 0 ISE816 l Speed Sensing Device l l Rm. 238 l l l l 0 lSS815 l Speed Control Switch l l Rm. 237 l l l 0 lSS816 l Speed Control Switch l l Rm. 238 l l

) i 0 IST815 ' Speed Switch l l Rm. 237 l l l  ! O IST816 i Speed Switch l l Rm. 238 l l l l 0 lSY815 l Converter l l Rm. 237 l l l l 0 lSY816 l Converter l l Rm. 238 l l l l l l 1 l 1 l l l l 1 1 I I (

l l l 1 l l l l 1 I I l l 1 l 1

l 1 l l 1 l l l l l l 1 1 I I l

l l l l 1 1 I I

l l l l l l l 1 1 l l l l l l l

Facilit avis-B:sso Unit 1 MASTL T Ind:x No -004 Docket: 50-346 Rev.: 2 Prepared by: [a,=d Date: 8 Checked by: .AI;a..fw . p Date: e . ,:

l l l l l LOCATION l l l l l l l Inside i Outside I I l Worksheet l l Plant l l Primary l Primary l I I Index No. I Rev. IID Number l Generic Name l Containment l Containment l REMARKS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4

1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l

l I l l l 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

) ( (

Facility: b o-Becca Unit 1 SYSTDt COMPONENT \,.J,UATION WORKSHEET Index 204H-005 Dock:t 50-346 Rev.: O Prspared by g/MD;h Date: M*l8*//

Checksd by: JO_W_M, Date: 9[gh l ll 1 l l l l EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ll DIVIRONMENT l DOCUMENTATION REF. l Qualification l Outstanding l l ll Parameter l Specification l Qualification I Specification lQualificationi Nethod i Items l l ll l l l l l l lSy tta: Deedwater l l Operating l 1 Yea r l 1.1 Wars l Note 3 l J-l l Analysis l None l l ll Time l l l l Note 4 l l l l Plant ID No.: LTSP9A3 ll l l l l l l l l ll l l l l l l l l Components level ll Temperature l 283.0 l 300.0 l H, X l J-l l Simultaneous l None l l Transmitter ll (*F) l l l l l Test l l l ll l 1 l l l l l Manufacturer: Bailey Meter l l l l l l l l l ll Pressure l 52.0 l 74.7 l G, X l J-l l Simultaneous l None l lk4odal Number: BYBB41X-A ll(PSIA) l l l l l Test l l ll l l l l l l l l Ebnction: Transmits Invelll l l l l l l l l Signals ll Relative l 100.0 l 100.0 l A l J-l l Simultaneous l None l l l ll Humidity l l l l l Test l l l

l Accuracy: Spect + .5% ll (% ) l l l l l l l Demon: ~+ .23%ll l l l l l l l ll l Boric Acid l Boric Acid l l l l l l Service: SG l-2 Start-up ll Chemical l 1800 ppm l 1800 ppm l A l CAL-42 l Analysis l None l l Inval for Aux. Feedwater l l Spray l pH 5.0 l pH 5.0 l l l l l l Control and Indications ll l l l l l l l l ll l l l 1 l 1 l lIncation: Containment ll l l l l l l l l Rm. 218 ll Radiation l1.7 x 107 RADS l4.0 x 107 RADS l CAL-44 l AG l Sequential Wstl Hone l l ll l l l l l l l '

l Flood Imvel Elev: 572'-2"ll l l . l l l l l l lAbova Flood Invel No ll Aging l 40 Years l 10.83 Years l I l CAL-38 l Analysis l None l l ll l l Note 1 l l l j l l lNesdad fort ll l l l l l l l Hot Shutdown lX l ll l l l l l l l l ll Submergence l 572'-2" l 568'-3" l B l J-ll l ' N/A l None l Cold Shutdown lX l ll l l Note 2 l l l l l l ll l l l l l l l t __ _- _ _ _ _ _ . -

O F;cility: Davis-Besse Unit 1 O

SYSTEM COMPONEr4T EVALUATION WORKSHEET O

Index No. : 204H-0 05A Rev.: 0 Dockst 50-346 NOTES Preparod by: W.MM M Date /D @d /

Ch cked by: */dpJ /!7. ~htsrw4 6

Date /b/Z;// /

1. This component is scheduled for replacement during the first refueling outage subsequent to component on-site availability.

Interim operation will not be affected due to the time margin provided.

2. ha flood level elevation specification is based on DBA-IDCA conditions. Under these conditions, the' transmitter will become submerged at 21.3 minutes post-IDCA (see CAL-49). This is a worst-case value based on a postulated DBA IDCA. For smaller LOCAs, component submergence will occur further into the accident, if it occurs at all. In the event of a DBA-LOCA, indication of steam generator level is not necessary because the secondary system is not utilized in the mitigation of the accident or in the ensuing cooldown. Cooldown is accomplish.ed via sung recirculation to the decay heat removal (LPI) system.

During envirornmental testing of the transmitter, high pressure steam was permitted to leak into the electronics housing to determine if the transmitter was required to be completely seal proof. The housing was pressurized to 60 psi prior to testing and experienced a .5 psi drop in 5 minutes. The unit was then environmentally tested, pressure tested af ter the environmental test, and no detectable moisture was found in the housing when it was opened. h e unit passed the test for operability, indicating that some leakage in the electronics enclosure is permissible. The test pressure is more severe than the postulated LOCA pressure, even when the additional pressure due to sulanergence is added. The four feet of water will add an additional 2 psi to the postulated pressure-of 52 psia. This condition is less severe than the tested conditions and we feel that submergence will not cause failure of the transmitter.

In the highly unlikely event of transmitter failure other safety-related functions will not be degraded because its only function is to transmit steam generator level signals to the integrated control system (which is not necessary during a IDCA) and to the control room level indicators. The operator will not be mislead by erroneous level indications because he would not be concerned with steam generator levels during a DBA-LOCA.

3. Ons year operating time is used as a conservative maximum specification.
4. According to profiles G and H, containment conditions will nearly return to ambient (2.5 psig, 104*F) within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, with a complete return to ambient within seven days. habient conditions will remain for the duration of the accident and ensuing cooldown. The 24-hour LOCA simulation test exposed the transmitter to a more severe environment than that which would ranult from the postulated loss of coolant eccident. Since the transmitter remained operable throughout the test, it can be concluded that it will also maintain functional operability during the short term accident environment and the long-term cooldown at ambient conditions.

/

Facility: D Dock;ts S2Cr2 Unit 1 50-346 SYSTH1 COMPONENT k_,lATION WORKSHEET Index R;v.:

04H-005 2

Prepared by: aaab Date: [!

Date: v/,r/n Ch;ck d by: Wh(L l ll l l l l l EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ll ENVIRONMENT l DOCUMENTATION REF. l Qualification l Outstanding l l ll Parameter l Specification l Qualification l Specification l Qualification Method l Items l l ll l l l l l l l System: Feedwater ll Operating l 1 Year l 1.1 Years l Note 1 l J-36 l Analysis l None l l ll Time l l l l l l l ll l Plant ID No.: LTSP9A3 l l l l l l ll 1 1 I l 1 l lComponsnt: Level ll Temperature l 283.0 l 350.0 l H, X l J-36 l Simultaneous l None l l Transmitter ll ('F) l l l l l Test l l

!l ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l lM2nufteturer: Rosemount ll l X J-36 l Simultaneous l None l ll ll Pressure l 52.0 l 85.0 l G, l ll(PSIA) l l l Test l l llModalNumber: 1153 l l l ll l l l l l l l l l l Function: Transmits Level ll l l l l l l Signals ll Relative l 100.0 l 100.0 l A l J-36 l Simultaneous l None l l llIlumidity l l l l l Test l l lAccurccy: Spect + 5.0%ll (%) l l l l l l l l l l l Demon: ~+ .42%ll l l ll l Boric Acid l Boric Acid l l J-36 l l l lS:rvics: SG l-2 Start-up l l Chemical l 1800 ppm l 1800 ppm l A l CAL-40 l Analysis l None l l Level ll Spray l pH 5.0 l pH 5.0 l l Note 3 l l l l ll l l l l l l l

l ll l l l l l Location: Containment ll l l l i I l l Rm. 218 l l Radiation 7 7 l1.7 x 10 RADS l 5. 0 x 10 RADS l CAL-44 l J-36 l Sequential Test l None l l ll l l l l l l l l

l Flood Level Elev: 572'-2"ll l l l l l l lAbova Flood Level: No ll Aging l 40 Years l 10 Years l I l CAL-66 l Sequential Test l None l l ll l l Note 4 l l J-36 l l l l

lNacded for: ll l l l l l l l Hot Shutdown lX l ll l l l l l l l ll Submergence l 572'-2" l 568'-3" l B l J-ll l N/A l None l l

l Cold Shutdown lX l ll l l Note 2 l l l l l l ll l l l l l l 1

,~

Pccility: D Dockst 9Bera Unit 1 SYSTEM COMPONENT \ ,.lATION WORKSHEET Ind;x hu 4H-005A 50-346 Rev. 2 Pr:parsd by:

Check;d by: c>67/&

Date Date

!]O?]

^/Ju/n

1. Ona year operating time is used as a conservative maximum specification.
2. The flood level elevation specification is based on DBA-LOCA conditions. Under these conditions, the transmitter will become submerged at 21.3 minutes post-LOCA ( see CAL-49) . This is a worst-case value based on a postulated DBA LOCA. For smaller LOCAs, component submergence will occur further into the accident, if it occurs at all. In the event of a DBA-LOCA, indication of steam generator level is not necessary because the secondary system is not utilized in the mitigation of the cecident or in the ensuing cooldown. Cooldown is accomplished via sump recirculation to the decay heat removal (LPI) system.

In Eddition, operating experience has shown that Rosemount transmitters installed at TMI-2 operated satisfactorily for cpproximately one month while submerged.

In the highly -unlikely event of transmitter f ailure other safety-related functions will not be degraded because its only function is to transmit steam generator level signals to the control room level indicators. The operator will not be mislead by erroneous level indications because he would -not be concerned with steam generator levels during a DBA-LOCA.

'3. CAL-40 qualifies components tested in a high pH boric acid spray to a pH of 5.0.

4 Materials and/or components sensitive to thermal aging will be replaced as per maintenance and rep acement schedules to aesure that associated component will maintain functional operability in harsh environments.

[\ )

.\

bcility: Da =2 thit 1 SYSTEM COMPONENT L ATION WORKSHEET Index No 4H-006 ockst: 50-346 Sev.: 0

'rcpar d by: _N ,

Date: 9.38*8/

h:cksd by: T Date 9/28@p ll l l l l EQUIIMENT DESCRIPTION ll ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF. l Qualification l Outstanding l l l Parameter l Specification l Qualification SpecificationI Qualification Method l Items l ll l l l l l l i Syst n: Feedwater ll Operating l 1 Year l 1.1 Years l Note 3 l J-l l Analysis l Hone l ,

ll Time l l l l Note 4 l l l Plcnt ID No.: LTSP9A4 ll l l l l l l l ll l l l l l l l Compon2nt: Ievel ll Temperature l 283.0 l 300.0 l H, X l J-l l Simultaneous l None l Transmitter ll (*F) l l l l l Test l l ll l l l l l l l Manufccturer: Bailey Meter ll l l l l l l l ll Pressure l 52.0 l 74.7 l G, X l J-l l Simultaneous l None l Modal Number BY8B41X-A ll(PSIA) l l l l l Test l l ll l l l l l l Ebnction: Transmits Invell l l l l l l l l Signals ll Relative l 100.0 l 100.0 l A l J-l l Simultaneous l Hone l ll Humidity l l l l l Test l l Accuracy Spec: + .5% ll (t) l l l l l l l Demon: I .23tll

~

l l l l l l l ll l Boric Acid l Boric Acid l l l l l Servica: SG l-2 Start-upll Chemical l 1800 ppm l 1800 ppm l A l CAL-42 l Analysis l None l Inval for Aux. Feedwater l l Spray l pH 5.0 l pH 5.0 l l l l l Control ll l l l l l l l ll l l l l l l l Iocation: Containment ll l l l l l l l Rn. 218 l l Radiation l1.7 x 107 RADS l4.0 x 107 RADS l CAL-44 l AG l Sequential Test l None l ll I I I l l l l I"lood Invel Elev 572'-2"ll l l l l l l l Abova Flood Ievel No ll Aging l 40 Years l 10.83 Years l I l CAL-38 l Analysis l None l ll l l Note 1 l l l l l Netdr.d for ll l l l l l l Hot Shutdown lX l ll l l l l l l l llSubmergencel 572'-2" l 568'-3" ( B l J-ll l N/A l None l Cold Shutdown lX l ll l l Note 2 l l l l l ll l l l l l l l

n s F;cilitys ( g -Becca Unit 1 SYSTDt COMPONE ATION WORKSHEET Index t%j04 H-006A Dockst: 50-346 Rev.: O Pr: par d by: M6 r__4 Date /D*/* 8/.

Qteck2d by: M f.M Date /4 W)/ '~

6

1. This component is scheduled for replacement during the first refueling outage subsequent to component on-site availability.

Interim operation will not be affected due to the time margin provided.

2. Tha flood level elevation specification is based on DBA-IDCA conditions. Under these conditions, the transmitter will become submerged at 21 3 minutes post-LOCA (see CAL-49). This is a worst-case value based on a postulated DBA LOCA. For cmaller IOCAs, component sutsnergence will occur further into the accident, if it occurs at all. The only safety related function performed by the transmitter is the transmission of steam generator level signal to the integrated control system (ICS).

During environmental testing of the transmitter, high pressure steam was permitted to leak into the electronics housing to dntermine if the transmitter was required to be completely seal proof. The housing was pressurized to 60 psi prior to tsztlng and experienced a .5 psi drop in 5 minutes. The unit was then environmentally tested, pressure tested after the cnvironmental test, and no detectable moisture was found in the housing when it was opened. The unit passed the test for operability, indicating that some leakage in the electronics enclosure is permissible. 'Ihe test pressure is more severe than the postulated IOCA pressure, even when the additional pressure due to sutunergence is added. The four feet of water will add an additional 2 psi to the postulated pressure of 52 psia. This condition is less severe than the tested conditions and we feel that submergence will not cause failure of the transmitter.

In the highly unlikely event of transmitter failure other safety-related functions will not be degraded because its only function is to transmit steam generator level signals to the integrated control system which is not necessary during a LOCA. Transmitter failure will not mislead the operator because it does not provide an indication function.

3. On3 year operating time is used as a conservative maximum specification.
4. According to profiles G and H, containment conditions will nearly return to ambient (2.5 psig, 104'F) within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, with a complete return to ambient within seven days. Ambient conditions will remain for the duration of the accident and ensuing cooldown. The 24-hour IDCA simulation test exposed the transmitter to a more severe environment than that which would result from the postulated loss of coolant accident. Since the transmitter remained operable throughout the test, it can be concluded that it will also maintain functional operability during the short term accident environment and the long-term cooldown at ambient conditions.

) Facility: LU uu-Iec3e Unit 1 SYSTEM COMPONENT w d ATION WORKSHEET Index E'm 204H-006 i Dockst: 50-346 R3v. 2

^ Check 1d by:

Prepsrsd by: l 0 a . .'a Date: N /!b

_ MnfL -f Date: ig/j/n l ll l l l l l EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ll ENVIRONMENT l DOCUMENTATION REF. l Qualification l Outstanding l 4

l ll Parameter l Specification l Qualification Specification Qualification l Method l Items l

, l ll l l l l i l lSyctta: Feedwater ll Operating l 1 Year l 1.1 Years l Note 1 l J-36 l Analysis l None l ,

i l ll Time l l l l l l l  !

l l Plant ID No. : LTSP9A4 ll l l l l l l  !

i l ll l l l l l l l

  • l l Component: '. Level llTemperaturel 283.0 l 350.0 l H, X l J-36 l Simultaneous l None l l l Transmitter ll (*F) l l l l l Test l l

! l ll l l l l l l lManufccturer Rosemount ll l l l l l l l l ll Pressure l 52.0 l 85.0 l G, X l J-36 l Simultaneous l None l

~ l Modal Numbers 1153 ll(PSIA) l l l l l Test l l l ll l l l l l l l

' l Function: Transmits Level ll l l l l l l l l Signals ll Relative l 100.0 l 100.0 l A l J-36 l Simultaneous l None l 1l ll Humidity l l l l .l Test l l l Accuracy: Spect + 5.0tll (s) l l l ,

I l

?l Demon ~+ .42tll l l l l l l

l ll l Boric Acid l Boric Acid l l J-36 l l l l Service: SG l-2 Start-up ll Chemical l 1800 ppe l 1800 ppm l A l CAL-40 l Analysis l Hone l l Level ll Spray l pH 5.0 l pH 5.0 l l Note 3 l l l

l ll l l l l l l l '

il ll l l l l l l Location: Containment ll l 7

l 7

l l l l l l Rm. 218 ll Radiation 11.7 x 10 RADS l 5. 0 x 10 RADS l CAL-44 l J-36 l Sequential Test l None l .

l ll l l l l l l l

) l Flood Level Elev: 572 '-2" l l l l l l l l l

.; lAbova Flood Level: No ll Aging l 40 Years l 10 Years l I l CAL-66 l Sequential Test l None l

! l ll l l Note 4 l l J-36 l l l l lNasdad for ll l l l l l l l l Hot Shutdown lX l ll l l l l l l l l l llSubmergencel 572'-2" l 568'-3" l B l J-ll l N/A l None l l l Cold Shutdown lX l _ ll l l Note 2 l l l l l ll ll l l l l l l l

l

\ v

' Fccility: L. s Bessa Unit 1 SYSTEM COMPONENbs.LUATION WORKSHEET Index v'204H-006A Dockst 50-346 Rev.: 2 ,

Prspared by: , Date 28 l Chick;d byn CA#ffslL 1/ Date 9/Jh/h s a 1

1. Ona-year operating time is used as a conservative maximum specification.

2 2. Tha flood level elevation specification is based on DBA-LOCA conditions. Under these cc,nditions, the transmitter will become submerged at 21. 3 minutes post-LOCA ( see CAL-49) . This is a worst-case value based on a postulated DBA LOCA. For i emaller LOCAs, component sutunergence will occur further into the accident, if it occurs at all. The only safety-related j function performed by the transmitter is the transmission of steam generator level signal to the integrated control system (ICS).

1 In addition, operating experience has shown that Rosemount transmitters installed at TMI-2 operated satisfactorily for approximately one month while submerged.

j

~

In the highly unlikely event of transmitter failure other safety-related functions will not be degraded because its only function is to transmit steam generator level signals for indication. Transmitter failure will not mislead the operator i because he would not be concerned with steam generator levels during a DBA LOCA.

3. CAL-40 qualifies components tested in a high pH boric acid spray to a pH of 5.0.
4. Materials and/or components sensitive to thermal aging will be replaced as per maintenance and replacement schedules to i assure that associated component will maintain functional operability in harsh envirorunents.

i I l i

i i

,f 1

i

(

! 3 l tcility  ::a thit 1 SYSTEM COMPONENT L.mATION WORKSHEET Index Noi- J4"-007 ock;t: 50-346 Rev.: 0

'rtparcd by: it/. / h _ Date: 8 LO 31

  1. m- 7-4 g7 A far. Date 21eck d by: q/Waf ll l l l l EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ll DIVIRONMENT l DOCUMENTATION REF. l Qualification l Outstanding l ll Parameter l Specification l Qualification : Specificationl Qualification Method l Items l ll l l l i l l Syrtem: Feedwater ll Operating l 1 Year l 1.1 Years l Note 3 l J-l l Analysis l None l ll Time l l l l Note 4 l l l Plcnt ID No.: LTSP9B3 ll l l l l l l l ll l l l l l l l Componnnt: Level ll Temperature l 283.0 l 300 0 l H, X l J-l l Simultaneous l None l Transmitter ll (*F) l l j l l Test l l ll l l l l l l l Manufccturer: Bailey Meter ll l l l l l l l ll Pressure l 52.0 l 74.7 l G, X l J-l l Simultaneous l None l Modal Number: BY8B41X-A ll(PSIA) l l l l l Rst l l ll l l i l l l Functicn Transmits level l l l l l l l l l Signals llDelative l 100.0 l 100.0 l A l J-l l Simultaneous l None l ll Humidity l l l l l nst l l Accurr.cy : Spec + .5% ll (%) l l l l l l l Demon: ~+ .23%ll l l l l l l l ll l Boric Acid l Boric Acid l l l l l Servica: SG l-1 Start-upll Chemical l 1800 ppm l 1800 ppm l A l CAL-42 l Analysis l None l Ieval for Aux. Feedwaterll Spray l pH 5.0 l pH 5 0 l l l l l Control and Indication ll l l l l l l l ll '

I I i l l l Iocation: Containment ll l l l l l l Rn. 21 6 l l Radiation l1. 7 x 107 RADS l4 0 x 107 RADS l CAL-44 l AG l Sequential Test l None l ll l l l l l l l Flood Level Elev: 572'-2"ll l l l l l l l Abova Flood Invel No ll Aging l 40 Years l 10.83 Years l I l CAL-38 l Analysis l None l ll l l Note 1 $ l l l l Nesd2d fors ll l l l l l l Hot Shutdown lX l ll l l l l l l l ll Submergence l 572'-0" l 569'-0" l B l J-ll l N/A l None l Cold Shutdown lX l ll l l Note 2 l l l l l ll l l l l l l 1

I Far:ility: Davio-Besse thnit 1 SYSTEM CCIPONENT EVALUATION WORKSHEET Index No. : 204H-007A Dockst 50-346 Rev.: O Preparsd by: M /. 8 :b Date /O. 2. &

, Otzcked by: h A9. M Date /ah //f V f 2 1. This component is scheduled for replacement during the first refueling outage subsequent to component on-site availability.

] Interim operation will not be affected due to the time margin provided.

' 2. Tha flood level elevation specification is based on DBA-LOCA conditions. Under these conditions, the transmitter will j bzcome submerged at 25.4 minutes post-IOCA (see CAL-49). This is a worst-case value based on a postulated DBA IOCA. For i smaller IOCAs, component submergence will occur further into the accident, if it occurs at all. In the event of a DBA-LOCA, j indication of steam generator level is not necessary because the secondary system is not utilized in the mitigation of the

accident or in the ensuing cooldown. Cooldown is accomplished via sump recirculation to the decay heat removal (LPI) system.

) During environmental testing of the transmitter, high pressure steem was permitted to leak into the electronics housing to i datermine if the transmitter was required to be completely seal proof. he housing was pressurized to 60 psi prior to l testing and experienced a .5 psi drop in 5 minutes. The unit was then environmentally tested, pressure tested after the i environmental test, and no detectable moisture was found in the housing when it was opened. We unit passed the test for l operability, indicating that some leakage in the electronics enclosure is permissible. Se test pressure is more severe j

than the postulated LOCA pressure, even when the additional pressure due to submergence is added. The four feet of water '

will add an additional 2 psi to the postulated pressure of 52 psia. his condition is less severe than the tested 4

conditions and we feel that submergence will not cause failure of the transmitter.

In the highly unlikely event of transmitter failure other safety-related functions will not be degraded because its only

} function is to transmit steam generator level signals to the integrated control system (which is not necessary during a l IDCA) and to the control room level indicators. The operator will not be mislead by erroneous level indications because he 4

woald not be concerned with steam generator levels during a DBA-LOCA.

3. Ona year operating time is used as a conservative maximum specification.

j 4. According to profiles G and H, containment conditions will nearly return to ambient (2.5 psig, 104*F) within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, with i a complete return to ambient within seven days. Ambient conditions will remain for the duration of the accident and ensuing cooldown. he 24-hour LOCA simulation test exposed the transmitter to a more severe environment than that which would

, result from the postulated loss of coolant accident. Since the transmitter remained operable throughout the test, it can be l concluded that it will also maintain functional operability during the short term accident environment and the long-term cooldown at ambient conditions.

l e

Fccility: Duv.2-D23se Unit 1 SYSTDI COMPONENT JATION WORKSHEET Index tid 204H- 00 7 4

Docksts 50-346 Rev. 2 l Prep 3 rad by: 0

  • a lA Dates f / ! .I Chicksd by: _34ikh (1 Dates ///J/A

~

l 11 l l l l l EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ll ENVIRONMENT l DOCUMENTATION REF. l Qualification l Outstanding l l ll Parameter l Specification l Qualification Specification Qualification l Method l Items l l ll 1 l l l l l

. l Sycts:::: Feedwater ll Operating l 1 Year l 1.1 Years l Note 1 l J-36 l Analysis l None l

!l ll Time l l l l l l l l Plant ID No.: LTSP983 ll l l l l l l ll l l l l l l Component: Level ll Temperature l 283.0 l 350.0 l H, X l J-36 l Simultaneous l Mone l j l Transmitter ll (*F) l l l l l Test l l l ll 1 l l l l l lMnnufacturer Rosemount ll l l l 1 l l l ll Pressure l 52.0 l 85.0 l G, X l J-36 l Simultaneous l None l l lNodel Number: 1153 ll(PSIA) l l l l l Test l l l ll l l l l l l l Function: Transmits Level ll l l l l i l l l Signals ll Relative l 100.0 l 100.0 l A l J-36 l Simultaneous l Mone l ll Humidity l l l 'l l Test l l l lllAccurtcy: Spect + 5.0%ll (t) _

l l l l l jl

, Demon: ~+ .42M l l l l l l

l ~ll l Boric Acid l Boric Acid l l J-36 l l l SG t-I Start-up ll Chemical l 1800 ppm l 1800 ppm l A l CAL-40 l Analysis l Mone l lll Service

l Level ll Spray l pH 5.0 l pH 5.0 l l Note 3 l l l

!l ll l l l l l l l l l ll l l l -l l l l

! l Loc-tion: Containment ll l 7

l l l l l l ll Rm. 2/6 ll Radiation l1.7 x 10 RADS l 5.0 x 10 7RADS l CAL-44 l J-36 l Sequential Testl None l 1l ll 1 l l l l l l Flood Level Elev: 572 '- 2" l l l l l l l l l lAbove Flood Level No ll Aging l 40 Years l 10 Years l I l CAL-66 l Sequential Test l None l l ll l l Note 4 l l J-36 l l l lNacdsd for ll l l l l l .l l

! l Hot Shutdown lX l ll l l l l l l l  ;

j l llSubmergencel 572'-2" l 560" l B l J-ll l N/A l Mone l t j l Cold shutdown lX l ll l l Note / l l l l l i l ll l l l l l l l

f %s.

[ )

Fzcility bj-Be=0 Unit 1 SYSTEM COMPONEN ATION WORKSHEET Ind;x 04H-007A Dockst 50-346 Rev.: 2 Pr;parsd by: . _ a Date fe 8I checksd by: p(h,p/xQJ Date f9"f../n

1. Ona year operating time is used as a conservative maximum specification.
2. Tha flood level elevation specification is based on DBA-LOCA conditions. Under these conditions, the transmitter will become submerged at 25.4 minutes post-LOCA (see CAL-49) . This is a worst-case.value based on a postulated DBA LOCA. For (maller LOCAs, component submergence will occur further into the accident, if it occurs at all. In the event of a DBA-IOCA, indication of steam generator level is not necessary because the secondary system is not utilized in the mitigation of the tecident or in the ensuing cooldown. Cooldown is accomplished via sump recirculation to the decay heat removal (LPI) system.

In addition, operating experience has shown that Rosemount transmitters installed at TMI-2 operated satisfactorily for rpproximately one month while submerged.

In the highly unlikely event of transmitter f ailure other safety-related functions will not. be degraded because its only function is to transmit steam generator level signals to the control room level indicators. The operator will not be mislead by erroneous level indications because he would not be concerned with steam generator levels during a DBA-LOCA.

3. CAL-40 qualifies components tested in a high pli boric acid spray to a pH of 5.0.

4 Materials and/or components sensitive to therm 4.1 aging will be replaced as per maintenance and replacement schedules to tezure that associated component will maintain functional operability in harsh environments.

I l

[h

  • acility: Da

( )

raa thit 1 SYSTH4 CI)MPONENT TION CORXSHEET Index No's. 04H-008 lockst: 50-346 Rev.: 0

'rsparad by: M./*MI'- de Date: 9 kB' &

,h:ck:d by: /r, Dates f/f6/d1 ll l l l l EQUIEMENT DESCRIPTION ll DNIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF. l Qualification l Outstanding l ll Parameter Specification l Qualification Specification l Qualification l Method l Itemis l ll l l l l l l System: Feedwater ll Operating l 1 Year i 1.1 Years l Note 3 l J-l l Analysis l None l ll Time l l l l Note 4 l l l Pltnt ID No.: LTSP9B4 ll l l l l l l l ll l l l l l l l Compon:nt: Invel ll Temperature l 283.0 l 300 0 l H, X l J-l l Simultaneous l None l Transmitter ll (*F) l l l l l 'ntst l l ll- l l l l l l l Manufccturer: Bailey Meter ll l l l l l l l ll Pressure l 52.0 l 74.7 l G, X l J-l l Simultaneous l None l Modal Ntimber BYBB41X-A ll(PSIA) l l l l l Test l l ll l l l l l l l Function: Transmits Imvelll l l l l l l l Signals ll Relative l 100.0 l 100.0 l A l J-l l Simultaneous l None l ll Humidity l l l l l Test l l Accursey: Spect + .5% ll (%) l l l l l l l Demon : ~+ .23%ll l l l l l l l ll l Boric Acid l Borjc Acid l l l l l

, Servica: SG l-1 Start-upl l Chemical l 1800 ppm l 1800 ppa l A l CAL-42 l Analysis l Hone l Imval for Aux. Feedwater l l Spray l pH 5.0 l pH 5.0 l l l l l Control ll l l l l l l l ll l l l l l l l Inc tion: Containment ll l l l l l l l Rn. 216 l l Radiation l1. 7 x 107 RADS l4.0 x 107 RADS l CAL-44 l AG l Sequential Test l None l ll l l l l l l l Flood Invel Elev: 572'-2"ll l l l l l l l Abova Flood Imvel: No ll Aging l 40 Years l 10.83 Years l I l CAL-3 8 l Analysis l None l ll l l Note 1 l l l l l Needid fors ll l l l l l l l Hot Shutdown lxl ll l l l l l l l ll Submergence l 572'-2" l 567'-0" l B l J-ll l N/A l None l Cold Shutdown lX l ll l l Note 2 l l l l l ll l l l l l l l

t

~

Facility: Davis-Bessa (knit 1 SYSTIBt 00flPONEK7 EVALUATION WORKSHEET Index No.: 204H-008A 50-346 j Dockat: Rev.: 0 NOTES

{ Prcpared by: M6 4  : Date N 2*fA Onscksd by: Q __ 4 d . 2/Lrende Date fo/n/f1

! 6'

1. This component is scheduled for replacement during the first refueling outage subsequent to component on-site availability.

Interim operation will not be affected due to the time margin provided.

2. Tha flood level elevation specification is based on DBA-LOCA conditions. Under these conditions, the transmitter will become submerged at 14.7 minutes post-IDCA (see CAL-49). This is a worst-case value based on a postulated DBA LOCA. For ,

smaller LOCAs, component submergence will occur further into the accident, if it occurs at all. He only safety-related

function performed by the transmitter is the transmission of steam generator level signal to the integrated control system (ICS).

t j

During environmental testing of the transmitter, high pressure steam was permitted to leak into the electronics housing to datermine if the transmitter was required to be completely seal proof. We housing was pressurized to 60 psi prior to

testing and experienced a .5 psi drop in 5 minutes. He unit was then environmentally tested, pressure tested after the ,

environmental test, and no detectable moisture was found in the housing when it was opened. He unit passed the test for t

operability, indicating that some leakage in the electronics enclosure is permissible. He test pressure is more severe j than therpostulated LOCA pressure, even when the additional pressure due to submergence is added. Se four feet of water 1

will add an additional 2 psi to the postulated pressure of 52 psia. This condition is less severe than the tested

conditions and we feel that submergence will not cause failure of the transmitter.

i In the highly unlikely event of transmitter failure other safety-related functions will not be degraded because its only function is to transmit steam generator level signals to the integrated control system which is not necessary during a l IDCA. Transmitter failure will not mislead the operator because it does not provide an indication function.

I

3. Ona year operating time is used as a conservative maximum specification.
4. According to profiles G and H, containment conditions will nearly return to ambient (2 5 psig, 104'F) within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, with a complete return to ambient within seven days. Ambient conditions will remain for the duration of the accident and ensuing '

cooldown. The 24-hour IDCA simulation test exposed the transmitter to a more severe environment than that which would razult from the postulated loss of coolant accident. Since the transmitter remained operable throughout the test, it can be

> concluded that it will also maintain functional operability during the short term accident envirorunent and the long-term l cooldown at ambient conditiens.

i i

f I

l

Icility: Da L JScss Unit 1 SYSTEM COMPONENT E U .. TION WORKSHEET Index ND'% el4H-008 ockst 50-346 R3v.s 2 Teparsd by: h 0ana A Dater kl /!

iheck:d by:

_ M&fL ( Dater ///)//3 ll 1 1 1 l EQUI: MENT DESCRIPTION ll ENVIRONMENT l DOCUMENTATION REF. l Qualification l Chttstanding l ll Parameter Specification l Qualification l Specification l Qualification l Method l Items l ll l l l l l l l

, Syststa Feedwater ll Operating l 1 Year l 1.1 Years l Note 1 l J-36 l Analysis l None l ll Time l l l l l l l

' 71Ent ID No.: LTSP984 l l l l l l l ll l l l l ,

l Compon:nt: Level ll Temperature l 283.0 l 350.0 l H, X l J-36 l Simultaneous l None l Transmitter ll (*F) l l l l l Test l l ll l l l l l l l M:nufteturer Rosemount ll l l l l l l l ll Pressure l 52.0 l 85.0 l G, X l J-36 l Simultaneous l None l Modal Number 1153 ll(PSIA) l l l l l Test l l ll l l l l l l l Function Transmits Level ll l l l l l l l I

Signals ll Relative l 100.0 l 100.0 l A l J-36 l Simultaneous l None l

! ll Humidity l l l l l Test l l l Accuracy: Spect + 5.04ll (t) l l l ^

l l l Demon I .42%ll

~

l l l l l l ll l Boric Acid l Boric Acid l l J-36 l l l S2rvica SG l-1 Start-up ll Chemical l 1800 ppm l 1800 ppm l A l CAL-40 l Analysis l None l Level ll Spray l pH 5.0 l pH 5.0 l l Note 3 l l l ll l l l l l l l ll l l l l l l l

Locstion
Containment ll l l l l l l l Rm. 216 l l Radiatio s l1.7 x 10 7RADS l5.0 x 10 7RADS l CAL-44 l J-36 l Sequential Test l None l ll 1 l l l 1 l I Flood Level Elev: 572 '-2" l l l l l l l l l Abova Flood Level No ll Aging l 40 Years l 10 Years l I l CAL-66 l Sequential Test l None l ll l l Note 4 l l J-36 l l l NesdId fort ll l l l l l l l Hot Shutdown lX l ll l l l l l l l ll Submergence l 572'-2" l 568'-3" l B l J-ll l H/A l None l Cold Shutdown lX l ll l l Note 2 l l l l l ll l l l l l l l

gw I )

Facility: D\_jBerse Unit 1 SYSTEM COMPONENT ATION WORKSHEET Index h 04H-008A Dock t 50-346 Rev.: 2 Prepar:d by:

Checktd by osf&),%.OJ/'

Date fhdM Date F/Je/JJ i

1. One-year operating time is used as a conservative maximum specification. l
2. The flood level elevation specification is based on DBA-LOCA conditions. Under these conditions, the transmitter will l

become submerged at 14.7 minutes post-LO"A (see CAL-49) . This is a worst-case value based on a postulated DBA LOCA. For i l

smaller LOCAs, component submergence will occur further into the accident, if it occurs at all. The only safety-related i function performed by the transmitter is the transmission of steam generator level signal to the integrated control system (ICS). ,

1 In addition, operating experience has shown that Rosemount transmitters installed at TMI-2 operated satisfactorily for l (pproximately one month while subnerged.

In the highly unlikely event of transmitter failure other safety-related functions will not be degraded because its only function is to transmit steam generator level signals for indication. Transmitter failure will not. mislead the operator because he will not be concerned with steam generator levels during a DBA LOCA.

3. CAL-40 qualifies components tested in a high pH boric acid spray to a pH of 5.0. /

4 M terials and/or components sensitive to thermal aging will be replaced as per maintenance at:d replacement schedules to cerure that associated component will'aaintain functional operability in harsh environments.

Facility: EL..J-Be:20 Unit 1 SYSTEM COMPONENT L..m,3ATION WORKSHEET Ind:x C._ /704H-009 Dockat: 50-346 Rev.: 2 Prepared by: . Date: !! b Checked by: M {l M Date: J//#fd5 1 11 l 1 l l l EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION 11 ENVIRONMENT l DOCUMENTATION REF. I Qualification l Outstanding l l ll Parameter l Specification l Qualification l Specification l Qualification! Method 1 Items 1 I 11 I I I I I I l l lSycte2: Feedwater System llOperating i 1 Year l 1.1 Years l F l M-28 l Simultaneous i None l

!l llTime l l 1 l Note 1 l Test l l IPlcnt ID No.: MV05990 11 1 I l l l l l 4l li l I l l 1 l l l Component: Valve Motor llTemperaturel 221.0 l 250.0 i C-314 l M-28 i Simultaneous 1 None l l Operator ll (*F) l l l l l Test l l

, 1 Note 2 ll l l 1 l l l l lManufteturer: Limitorque 11 l l l l l 1 l l llPressure i 19.76 l 39.7 l C-314 l M-28 l Simultaneous i None l IModal Number: SMB-1 ll(PSIA) l l l l l Test l l IO/N: 366321F ll l l l l l l l lS/N: 175908 ll l l l l l l 1 IFunction: Operates Aux- llRelative l 100.0 1 100.0 l A l M-28 i Simultaneous 1 None l liliary Feedwater Valve tollHumidity l l ,

1 l l Test l l lSteta Generator 2 ll (t) l l l l l l l l Accuracy: Spec: N/A ll l l l l l l l l Demon: N/A ll l l l l l l 1 l llChemical i N/A l N/A l N/A l N/A 1 N/A l None l lSarvice: Steam Generator ll Spray I l l l 1 l l l 2 Auxiliary Feedwater ll l l 1 l l 1 l l Isolation Valve ll l 1 l l 1 l l l Location: Auxiliary Bldg.ll l l l l l l l 6 7 l Rm. 314 ll Radiation 11.0 x 10 PADS 12.0 x 10 RADS 1 T l M-28 ISequential Testl None l I ll l l 1 I l l l l Flood Level Elev: N/A ll l l l l l 1 l lAbove Flood Level: N/A IlAging l 40 Years l 40 Years l I I CAL-93 l Sequential Testl None l 1 il 1 I l l l Analysis l 1 lNe&d:d for: ll l l l l l l l l Hot Shutdown IX l ll l l l l l l l 4 l llSubmergencel N/A l N/A I N/A l N/A 1 N/A l None 1

I Cold Shutdown l X l ll l l 1 1 l l l l lI l l I I I I I

,a

- ~

L FEcility: Davic-Becse Unit 1 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORKSHEET Index No.: 204N-0094 Docksts 50-346 Rev.: 2 Preparsd by: Dates / O Checkid bya v.'6n ,6i .,# Date: O ?, ? f T

1. The test subjected the . valve motor operator to a transient 250*F and 39.7 psia for 30 minutes, followed by a cooldown to 120*F in 1.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />. The valve motor operator was then exposed to a second transient of 250*F and 39.7 psia for 22 hours2.546296e-4 days <br />0.00611 hours <br />3.637566e-5 weeks <br />8.371e-6 months <br />, th:n a cooldown to 200*F and 24.7 psia which was maintained for 15 days. The temperature in Room 314 peaks at 221*F in 1.55 seconds. The pressure in Room 314 peaks at 19.76 psia in 0.086 seconds. The temperature and pressure in Room 314 return to tubient conditions after 8 minutes.

Based on this information, it can be concluded that the laboratory test subjected the valve motor operator to an overall more severe environment than .that which would result from the postulated HELB. Since the valve motor operator remained aperable throughout the test, it can be co.1cluded that the valve motor operator will remain functional during and af ter exposure to the accident environment which would result from the postulated HEIA. (Reference C-314, ROC-24C, ROC-24D, ROC-024B) i2 The motor / brake assembly of this valve motor operator is scheduled to be replaced in accordance with FCR 83-067.

l

,- y N ] N b Facility: Di.ue-DO:02 Unit 1 SYSTEM COMPONENT L __2ATION WORKSHEET Ind x N . 204"-010 Dockst 50-346 Rev.: 2 Prep 2 red by: , , Date: # k Ch cked by: fM 9g _# Date: ///J-///

I ll l l l l l EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ll ENVIRONMENT I DOCUMENTATION REF. l Qualification l Outstanding l l ll Parameter l Specification l Qualification ISpecificationl Qualification! Method l Items l l Il l l 1 I l I l lSy;tOa: Feedwater System l l Operating l 30 Seconds l 12 Hours l K l M-27 l Simultaneous l None l l llTime l l l l V-24G l Test l l lPlcnt ID No.: MV06010 ll l l l l Note 1 l 1 l l ll l l 1 l l l 1 l Component: Valve Motor llTemperaturel 221.0 l 212.0 1 C-314 l M-27 l Simult3neous l None l l Operator ll (*F) l l Note 2 l l V-24G l Test l l l Note 3 ll l l l l l l l lMrnufteturer: Limitorque ll l l I l l l l

, l ll Pressure l 19.76 l 14.95 i C-3?4 l M-27 i Simultaneous l None l lM:dal Number: SMB-4 ll(PSIA) l l Note 2 l l V-24G l Test l l lO/N: 366321H ll l l l l l l l lS/N: 178941 ll l l l l l l l IFunction: Operates Main llRelative i 100.0 l 100.0 l A l M-27 I simultaneous l None l l Feedwater Valve toll Humidity l l l l V-24G l Test l l l Steam Generator 2ll (t) l l l l l l l lAccurtcy: Spec: N/A ll l l l l l l l l Demon: N/A ll l l l l l l l l ll Chemical l N/A l N/A l N/A l N/A I N/A l None l lSarvice: Steam GeneratorilSpray l l l l l l l l 2 Main Feedwaterll l l l l l l l l Isolation Valvell l l l l l 1 l l Location : Auxiliary Bldg.ll l l l l l l l 6

l Rm. 314 ll Radiation l1.0 x 10 RADS l Note 3 l T l Note 4 l Note 1 l None l l ll l l l l l l l lPlo:d Level Elev: N/A ll l l l l l l lAbova Flood Level: N/A ll Aging l 40 Years l Note 3 I l CAL-93 l Note 1 l None l l ll l l l I l Analysis l l lNe:d:d for: ll l l l l l l l l Hot Shutdown i X l ll 1 l l l l l l l ll Submergence l N/A I N/A l N/A l N/A l N/A l None l l Cold Shutdown l l ll l l l l l l l l ll I l l l 1 I l

i  ;

)

6 y \ )

F cility: Da uc-Be232 Unit 1 SYSTDi COMPONENT ATION WORKSHEET Index No.-/204H-010A Dock;t: 50-346 Rev.: 2 pr: par;d by: __

' ^

Dates 8 Check 2d by: c ee ,, _dit ,/ Date: '

' 3eg / i

1. Tha peak conditions in Room 314 are greater than the test report peak temperature. The test subjected the valve motor operator to a peak temperature of 212*F and 14.95 psia for 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />, then 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> at 155'F and 14.95 psia. The temperature perks at 221*F in 1.55 seconds in Room 314. The pressure peaks at 19.76 psia in 0.086 seconds. The temperature and pressure in Roon 314 return to ambient conditions in 8 minutes.

Esed on this information, it can be concluded that the laboratory test subjected the valve motor operator to an overall more severe environment than that which would result from the postulated HELB. Since the valve motor ov erator remained operable throughout the test and functional after the test, it can be concluded that the valve motor operator will remain functional during and after exposure to the accident environment which would result from the postulated HELB.

2 For 20 seconds of the 8-minute postulated HELB transient in Room 314, the room temperature exceeds the test temperature. In codition, for 27.75 seconds of the 8-minute transient, the 15'F required temperature margin is not available. The peak pressure in Room 314 exceeds the test temperature for the first 10 seconds of the 8-minute steam transient.

3. Tha brake coil of this actuator is scheduled to be replaced in accordance with FCR 83-067 4 There will be some thermal lag time for a component's surface temperature to reach the postulated condition. Since the portulated HELB steam transient is so rapid and of such a short duration, and since the time which the postulated HELB conditions exceed the test report conditions is so short, good engineering judgement allows us to state that the valve motor opsrator will be able to withstand the harsh environment. Based on this analysis, and the fact that continuing investigation is under way to further qualify, modify, or replace the valve motor operator, it is felt that qualification is ju;tified for the valve motor operator (Reference C-314).

)

Facility: L--su-Dosse Unit 1 SYSTEM COMPONENT \,._iCATION WORKSIIEET Ind:x C.-s/204H-011 Docket: 50-346 Rev. : 2 i

Ptspared by: Date: Il N Checkid by: M _A - f ___ Date: /// //S I ll l l 1 l l EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ll ENVIRONMENT l DOCUMENTATION REF. l Qualification l Outstanding I l ll_ Parameter l Specification l Qualification l Specification l Qualification! Method l Items l 1 11 I l l l l l l lSystea: Feedwater System llOperating l 1 Year i 1.1 Years l F l M-28 l Simultaneous I None l l llTime l l l l Note 1 l Test l l 4

IPlant ID No.: MV06080 ll l l l l l l l l II I l l l l l l lCompcnent: Valve Motor llTemperaturel 218.0 1 250.0 l C-303 l M-28 l Simultaneous l None l l Operator ll (*F) l l l l l Test l l l Note 2 ll l l l l l l l l lMrnufccturer: Limitorque ll l l l l l l l l ll Pressure l 17.16 l 39.7 i C-303 l M-28 l Simultaneous l None l l Modal Number: SMB-1 ll(PSIA) l l l l l Test l l lO/N: 366321F ll l l l l l l l lS/N: 175909 ll l l l l l l l l Function: Operates Aux- ll Relative i 100.0 l 100.0 l A l M-28 l Simultaneous l None l ,

liliary Feedwater Valve tollHumidity l l l l l Test l l lStora Generator 1 ll (t) l l l l l l l lAccurecy: Spec: N/A ll l l l l l l I I Demon: N/A ll l l l l l l l l llChemical l N/A l N/A l N/A l N/A l N/A l None l lS2rvjce: Steam Generator ll Spray l l l l l l l l 1 Auxiliary Feedwater ll l l l l l l l l Isolation Valve ll l l l l l l l i ILocation: Auxiliary Bldg.ll l l l l l l l

' I Rm. 303 ll Radiation 11.16 x 10 . R6 ADS l 2.0 x 107 RADS l T l M-28 l Sequential Testl None l I ll l I I I I I l lPlood Level Elev: N/A ll l l l l ,1 l l IAbova Flood Level: N/A ll Aging l 40 Years 1 40 Years l I l CAL-93 l Sequential Testl None l l ll l I l l l Analysis l l lN2sdad for: ll l l l l l l l j l Hst Shutdown IX l ll l l l l l l l l l llSubmergencel N/A l N/A l F/A l N/A l N/A l None l l Cold Shutdown IX l ll l l l l l l l ll ll l l l l l l l 1

(~ \ [

l

} SYSTD4 COMPONENT EVALUATION WORKSHEET

\

Index N'o!I 204H-Olla Fccility: Davis-Becse Unit 1 Dock 2t 50-346 Rev.: 2 Prepar2d by: , Dates D Check;d by: _% 4% .gl j Dates -

!c 44 I

1. Tha test subjected ti,e valve motor operator to a transient 250*F and 39.7 psia for 30 minutes, followed by a cooldown to 120*F in 1.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />. The valve motor operator was then exposed to a second transient of 250*P and 39.7 psia for 22 hours2.546296e-4 days <br />0.00611 hours <br />3.637566e-5 weeks <br />8.371e-6 months <br />, than a cooldown to 200*F and 24.7 psia which was maintained for 15 days. The temperature in Room 303 peaks at 218'F in 1.5 ceconds. The pressure in Room 303 peaks at 17.16 psia in 0.038 seconds. The temperature and pressure in Room 303 return to ,

1 c~bient conditions af ter 19 minutes. ,

l Baced on this information, it can be concluded that the laboratory test subjected the valve motor operator to an overall i I

more severe environment than that which would result from the postulated HELB. Since the valve motor operator remained operable throughout the test, it can be concluded that the valve motor operator will remain f onctional during and after cxposure to the accident environment which would result from the postulated HELB. (Reference C-303, ROC-24C, ROC-24D, ROC-24B)

2. Th2 motor / brake assembly of this valve motor cperator is scheduled to be replaced in accordance with FCR 83-067.

l Pccility: Ds J-Seaca Unit 1 SYSTEM COMPONENT u _J"ATION WORKSHEET Index Es </204H-012 Dockst: 50-346 Rev.: 2

, Preparsd by: Date: k Chicksd by: L %^ ? _A # Date: gh l ll I I I I l EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ll ENVIRONMENT l DOCUMENTATION REP. I Qualification l Outstanding l l . ll Parameter l Specification i Qualification ISpecificationlQualification! Method l Items l l Il l l- l I l l l lSystcQ: Feedwater Systent ll Operating l 30 Seconds l 12 Hours l K l M-27 i Simultaneous l None l l ll Time l l l l V-24G l Test l l lPltnt ID No.: MV06120 11 I l l l Note 1 l l l 1 ll l l l l 1 l l l Comp:nent: Valve Motor llTemperaturel 218.0 l 212.0 i C-303 l M-27 l Simultaneous l None l l Operator ll (*P) l l Note 2 l l V-24G l Test l l l Note 3 ll l l l l l 1 l lMcnufacturer: Limitorque ll l l l l l l l l ll Pressure l 17.16 l 14.95 l C-303 l M-27 l Simultaneous i None l lModsl Number: SMB-4 ll(PSIA) l l Note 2 l l V-24G l Test l l lO/N: 366321H ll l 'l I l l l l lS/N: 178940 ll l l l l l l l l Function: Operates Main ll Relative l 100.0 l 100.0 l A l M-27 l Simultaneous l Fone l l Feedwater Valve tolIHumidity I i l l V-24G l Test l l l Steam Generator 1ll (t) l l l l l l l l Accuracy: Spec: N/A ll l l l l l l l l Demon: N/A ll l l l l l l l l ll Chemical l N/A l N/A l N/A l N/A l N/A l None l lSarvice: Steam Generator ll Spray l l l l l l l l 1 Main Feedwaterll l l l l l l l I l Isolation valve ll l l l I l l l l Location: Auxiliary Bldg.ll l t l l l l l 6 '

l Rm. 303 IIRadiation 11.16 x 10 RADS l Note 3 l T l Note 4 l Note 1 l None l l ll l l l l l l l l Flood Level Elev: N/A ll l l l l l l l l lAbove Flood Level: N/A ll Aging l 40 Years l Note 3 l I l CAL-93 l Note 1 l None l l ll l l l l l Analysis i I lNsedad for: ll l l l l l l l l Hot Shutdown Ixl ll l l l l l l l l ll Submergence l N/A l N/A l N/A l N/A l N/A l None l Il Cold Shutdown l l ll l l l l l l l I ll l l l l l l l

\

F;cility:

\ )

Ouv10-Becse Unit 1

\ )

SYSTEM COMPONENT %dLUATION WORKSHEET

\

Index Ikw)204H-01 Dockst: 50-346 Rev.: 2.

Pr7parsd by: Date 8 I Ch2ckcd by: 4h*fC _ f Dates 7 . Is >s

1. The peak conditions in Room 303 are greater than the test report peak temperature. The test subjected the valve motor operator to a peak temperature of 212*F and 14.95 psia for 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />, then 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> at 155*r and 14.95 psia. The temperature pscks at 21B*F in 1.50 seconds in Room 303. The pressure peaks at 17.16 psia in 0.038 seconds. The temperature and prsssure in Room 303 return to ambient conditions in 19 minutes.

Baced on this information, it can be concluded that the laboratory test subjected the valve motor operator to an overall more severe environment than that which would result from the postulated HELB. Since the valve motor operator remained oparable throughout the test and functional a2ter the test, it can be concluded that the valve motor operator will remain functional during and after exposure to the accident environment which would result from the postulated HELB.

2 For 3.7 seconds of the 19-minute postulated HELB transient in Room 303, the room temperature exceeds the test temperature.

In addition, for the first 30 seconds of the 19-minute transient, the 15'F required temperature margin is not available.

Tha peak pressure in Room 303 exceeds the test temperature for the first 8.2 seconds of the 19-minute steam transient.

3. Tha brake coil of this valve motor operator la scheduled to be replaced in accordance with FCR 83-067.

4 Thare will be some thermal lag time for a component's surface temperature to reach the postulated condition. Since the postulated HELB steam transient is so rapid and of such a short duration, and since the time which the postulated HELB conditions exceed the test report conditions is so short, good engineering judgement allows us to state that the valve motor

oparator will be able to withstand the harsh environment. Based on this analysis, and the fact that continuing investigation is under way to further qualify, modify, or replace the valve motor operator, it is felt that qualification is justified for the valve motor operator (Reference C-303).

I l

4

,s

?rcilityr Dis __JB1032 Unit 1 SYSTEM COMPONENT Ev--*ATION WORKSHEET IndIx Nis 04d-013 Rev.: 2

)ockst: 50-346 l Prep 2 rid by: h

,d'# ? Cl / Date:

_ Date: l[

N/M/)

b Checksd by:

l l l l I ll ENVIRONMENT l DOCUMENTATION REF. l Qualification l Outstanding l lEQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ll l ll Parameter l Specification l Qualification l Specification l Qualification! Method l Items I 1 l l 1 l l l l ll lSystca Feedwater System ll Operating l 1 Year l 1.1 Years l F l M-28 l Simultaneous l None l llTime l l l l V-24G l Test l l l

l l Note 1 l _l l lPIEnt ID No.: MV13830 ll l l I I l i I I G l Il lComponInt: Valve Motor llTemperature! 218.0 l 250.0 l C-303 ,

M-28 l Simultaneous l Hone l Operator (*F) l l l l V-24G l Test l l i ll l

l I I I I -l I ll l l l l llMinufteturer: Limitorque ll l l l M-28 l Simultaneous l None i ll llPressure l 17.16 l 39.7 l C-303 l ll(PSIA) l l l V-24G l Test l l

! Modal Number: SMB-000 l l l l l l l

.lO/N: 362137B ll l l l l l l llS/N: 178277 ll l l M-28 i Simultaneous l None l IFunction: Operates ll Relative l 100.0 l 100.0 l A l Service Water Suction ll Humidity I l l l V-24G l Test l l l

l l l I l l Valve to AF Pump 2 ll (t) l l l l l l l lAccuracy: Spec: N/A ll l l l l l l l Demon: N/A ll l l 1 N/A N/A l N/A l N/A l None l l llChemical l N/A l l l

lSarvica: Auxiliary Feed- ll Spray l l l l l l l l l l l l water Pump 2 Servicell l l l l l l Water Suction Valve ll l l l l l

l I l l l l l Location: Auxiliary Bldg.ll 6 M-28 l Sequential Testl None i l Rm. 303 llRadiation 11.16 x 10 RADSl2.0 x 10 7 RADS l T l l l l l v-24G l l l I ll l l l l IFlood Level Elev: N/A ll l l l l Sequential Testl None l Abova Flood Level: N/A ll Aging l 40 Years l 40 Years l I l CAL-93 l l 1 l l l Analysis i I l ll l l l l l INasdtd for: ll l l l l l l l Hot Shutdown l X l ll l l l N/A N/A l N/A l N/A l None l' l llSubmergencel N/A l l l l l l l Cold Shutdown l X l ll l l l 1 I I I ll l l l l

N N

) /

Facility: \fvin-Besse Unit 1 SYSTEM COMPONEMJ a.$'ALUATION WORKSHEET Inda No.: )204H-013 Dockst 50-346 Rev.: 2, prepared by: Y . MR b E Date // /

Onecked by: Gdffsg]Qf Date: //).3 /93 i 1. %e test subjected the valve motor operator to a transient of 250'F and 39 7 paia for 30 minutes, followed by a cooldown to 120*F in 1.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />. We valve motor operator was then exposed to a second trancient of 250*F and 39.7 psia for 22 hours2.546296e-4 days <br />0.00611 hours <br />3.637566e-5 weeks <br />8.371e-6 months <br />, then a cooldown to 200*F and 24.7 psia which was maintained for 15 days. %e tsaperature in Room 303 peaks at 218'F in 1.5 seconds. We pressure in Rcom 303 peaks at 1716' psia in 0.038 seconds. We temperature and pressure in Room 303 return to ambient af ter 19 minutes.

Based on this information, it can be concluded that the laboratory test subjected the valve motor operator to an overall I

more severe environment than that which would result from a postulated HEIA. Since the valve motor operator remained operable throughout the test and functional after the test, it can be concluded that the valve motor operator will remain I functional during and af ter exposure to the accident environment which would result from the postulated HEIA. (Reference C-303) 1 I

i i

i

.