ML20058Q148

Forwards Rev 3 to FNP-1-M-043, Jm Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Second 10-Yr Inservice Insp Program,Asme Code Class 1,2 & 3 Components.

ML20058Q148
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	08/15/1990
From:	Hairston W ALABAMA POWER CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20058Q152	List: ML20058Q148 ML20058Q154
References
NUDOCS 9008210118
Download: ML20058Q148 (5)

Text

. -. . - - .

+ -l-

' +

, i.,

. ,,; / Al'ab

ma Power Company. ..

40 invern:ss Cent:r Parkw:y'

• Post Ofhce Box 1295 '  ;

Birmingham, Alabama 35201  ;

Telephone 205 868 5581 :

i h

W, G. Hairston, Ill l t

Senior Vice President Nuclear Operations ,

ggh3gg g g -l thesouthern electric system r August 15,' 1990 10CFR50.55a(g):

.i

'l i

k Docket No.'50-348 l ,U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission '

l' Attention: Document Control Desk

[ Vashington, D. C. . 20555

. Gentlemen:

Joseph M. Farley Nuclear-Plant'- Unit-1 l Second Ten-Year-Interval Inservic.: fnspection Program for ASME Code Class 1, 2~ ant . l- Components-Revision 0 of the-Unit 1 Second Ten-Year Inservice Inspection (ISI)- ,

Program was submitted to the NRC by letter dated November 23, 1987.-. The NRC granted' interim approval'of the reliefs requested in Revision 0 by letter i dated December 10, 1987. . Revisions.1 and 2 of the;programiincluding two additional relief requests were submitted'by-letter dated September 9, 1988. '

By letter dated August 3,-1989, the NRC requested that Alabama Power Company provide additional information pertaining.to the-review of the'ISI Program.

Alabama Power Company responded to the NRC's Request for Additional Information (RAI), by letters dated October 5 and December 7,1989. and April 12, 1990..

The RAI-responses contained commitments-to revise the.ISI Program including the modification or deletion of certain relief requests.- ~ Revision 3 of the ISI Program is-herewith submitted to incorporate these changes.. Upon receipt of the NRC's granting of relief., these changes vill be implemented.

4 i

b

/

^ f00$25E'118 900815 PDR ADOCK 95000348 h i 3

g PDC j- -

\\

l 1

-. 1

- U. Sh Nuclear Regulatory Commission' Page 2 1

1 It'there are any questions or if_ additional information is needed, please advise. ,

I Respectfully submitted, )

ALABAMA POVER COMPANY l bb. - O-  ;

V. G. Hairston, III ..

VGH/DEM/STBicht-nrc.8.35 Enclosure cci Mr..S. D. Ebneter Mr. S. T. Hoffman i Mr. G. F. Maxwell .

Mr. B. Brown

.i a

a u

I' t

FNP-1-M-043 Summary of Revision 3 to the J. M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1 Second Ten Year-Inservice Inspection Program for ASME Code  ;

C1 ass 1, 2, and 3 Components--

L

' Paoe No./Descriotion/ Reason for Chanae

1. Table of Contents: Changed the title of Section 1.9 from Repair  ;

qProcedures" to ' Repair and Replacement Program". Editerial correction.

a

! 2. Page 1-3, Section 1.7.1: Revised.to clarify requirements for performing l ultrasonic examinations,. including incorporation of Code Case N 435-1.

l Per APCo letter to NRC dated 10/5/89, Enclosure 1, Item J.

3. Page 1-4, Section 1.8; first sentence,'2nd word

.. Changed " result =of...",

to "rcsults are. ..". Editorial correction.

14. Page 1-4, Section 1.9;-third sentence: Added " Repaired or replaced- >

components which are... with subsequent inservice examinations".. To 3 further define the Repair and. Replacement Program.-

5. Page 1-5, Section 1.12: Revised to reflect listing of ASME Code Cases .

from Regulatory Guide 1.147 applicable for the second 10 year inspection '

interval. Reference APCo letter to NRC dated 10/5/89, Enclosure' 1, ,

Item H.

6. .Page 3-3, Residual Heat Exchangers: Revised to reflect correct-configuration and examination requirements. Editorial correction.

7. Page 4-5, Auxiliary Steam System: Moved relief request RR-38 from-functional test to hydrostatic test. Editorial correction. r

8. Page 4-9,.RHR Hx.: Revised to reflect the number of componentss Editorial omission.

l 9. Page 4-16, Spent-fuel Pool Pumps: Added relief request RR-33 to hydrostatic test. Editorial omission.

1

10. Page 6 1: Revised " Examination Area". description for RR 2 thru RR-6 to reflect required changes to relief requasts. Editorial.

11. Page 6>3: Revised-" Examination Area" description for RR-24 to reflect required changes to relief request. Editorial .

l 12. Page 6 4: Revised " Examination: Area" description for RR-45 to reflect i

required changes to relief request and RR-46 from "(7)" system hydrostatic tests to "(8)". ' Editorial.

13. Page 6-5: For relief request RR-1, revised description of welds examined using calibration block ALA-RV 3. Editorial correction'.

l Page 1 of 3 4

g --ww ,w,

FNP leM 043

14. - Page 6 7: For RR-2, revised description of' welds examined using all three calibration blocks. Editorial correction.- l

15. Page 6 8: General revision of relief request RR 3 based on recent dimensional evaluation of calibration blocks. - Reference APCo letters to NRC dated 10/5/89 and 12/7/89, Enclosure 1,. Item J.-

16~. Page 6 9: Previous relief request RR-4 was no longer applicable and was [

rewritten to allow the use of Code Case N 461 where the-thickness - 1 difference between calibration blocks and the component exceeds Section' '

XI, Appendix III allowances. .Per APCo. letter to.NRC dated 10/5/89,:

Enclosure 1,. Item J. <

17. Page 6-10: Added page in conjunction with rewrite of RR-4 and renumbered t

following pages as required. Editorial.

-t

18. Page 6 11: General revision of relief roouest RR-5 based on recent dimensional evaluation of calibration blocks.- Reference APCo letters to NRC dIted 10/5/89. and 12/7/89, Enclosure 1,' Item J.

19. Page 6-12: Deleted relief request RR 6. No longer required. Reference APCo letter to NRC dated 12/7/89, Enclosure 1, Item J.

20. Page 6-13: General revision of relief request RR-7 based on recent dimensional evaluation of calibration blocks. Reference APCo letters to NRCdated10/5/89and12/7/89, Enclosure 1,'ItemJ.

21. Page 6-15: Relief request RR 9 was revised to clarify.examin'ation

~

l l coverage. Reference APCo letter to NRC dated 10/5/89, Enclosure 1,

Item M.

t

22. Page 6-17, relief request RR-10 in " Component or Relief Area:" line four: i Changed No," to "Nos.". Edi M ial' correction, ,

23. Page 6-20: Added Attachment 11.1 to relief request RR-ll to clarify relief and renumbered following pages as required.- Reference APCo letter to NRC dated 10/5/89, Enclosure 1, Item N.

24. Page 6-30: Relief re examination coverage. Reference quest RR-18 APCo was revised letter to include to NRC' the percent of dated.10/5/89, Enclosure 1.- Item P.

25. Page 6-33, relief request. RR-21 in " Basis for Relief Area", line- '*

thirteen: Added "...and STP-220.ll, 220.12 (T.S. 4.3.3.8/68)". To reflect additional procedures applicable to-Unit 1.

26. Page 6-34, relief reque'st RR-22 in " Component or Relief Area", Item-E:

Deleted Item E as relief is not required and changed Item F to E. Also, added; note to clarify relationship with RR-30. Reference APCo letters to NRC dated 10/5/89,-Item S and 4/12/90, Item 3, respectively. -!.

5 Page 2 of 3

q FNP 1-M 043 l 27;- ;Page 6 36, relief request RR;23_in " Component or Relief Area": -Added line numbers CCB-46A, CC8 46B, and'CCB 46C under Section A and added CCB 50 under Section D.- Editorial omission.

28. :Page 6 39: Deleted relief. request RR 24. No longer required. Reference '

APCo letter to NRC dated 10/5/89, Enclosure 1, Item T.  ;

29. Page 6-41, relief request RR-26 in." Component or Relief Area": -Added 1 line numbers HCB-16 under Section D. Editorial omission. t

30. Page 6-43: Revised relief request RR-28 to clarify. Reference APCo letter-to NRC dated 10/5/89,- Enclosure 1, Item R.

-t

31. Page 6 44:': Added Attachment 281 to clarify RR-28 and renumbered following pages as required. Reference APCo letter to NRC dated 10/5/89, Enclosure 1, Item R.

32. Page 6-45: Revised relief request RR-29 to clarify the ASME Code. l requirements as done on_ Unit 2. Reference APC0 Unit 2 letter to NRC  ;

dated 3/23/89, Item 5.

33. Page 6 46:' Added note-to relief request RR-30 to clarify relationship-with RR-22. Reference APCo letter"to NRC dated 4/12/90, Enclosure 1, Item 3. 1 1

' 34. Page 6-47: Revised relief request RR 31 to clarify service water pump .'

inaccessibility for visual-examination during system pressure test as -

done on Unit 2. Reference APCo Unit 2 letter to NRC dated 3/23/89, Item 6.

35. Page 6-49 and 6-50: Revised relief request RR-33 to identify those portions of the applicable systems which cannot be hydrostatically a tested and renumbered following pages as required. Reference APCo 1 I

letter to NRC dated'10/5/89, Enclosure 1, Item W.

36. Page 6-63: Deleted relief request RR-45. No longer required. - Reference APCo letter to NRC dated 10/5/89, Enclosure 1, Item CC.

37. Page 7-1; Item 9: Revised to reference the current revision of.

Regulatory Guide 1.14.7 applicable for the second 10-year inspection interval. Reference APCo letter to NRC dated 10/5/89, Erclosure 1, Item H.

38. Page 7-2; Item 13: Added listing of ASME Co'de Cases from Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision 7, applicable to the second 10-year- inspection-

, interval and renumbered following pages as required. Reference APCo-i letter to NRC dated 10/5/89, Enclosure l', Item H.

01004 Page 3 of 3 i

., .,m _.l...-...

- --- **'" ' ' " ' "