ML060750738

NRC Perry CAL Inspections IP 95002 CAP Action Item Slides

ML060750738
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	03/14/2006
From:	NRC/RGN-III
To:
References
Download: ML060750738 (19)

Text

Perry Nuclear Power PlantPerry CAL Perry CAL Followup FollowupInspections Inspections

--IP 95002 Issues and Corrective Action IP 95002 Issues and Corrective Action Program EffectivenessProgram EffectivenessNuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Regulatory Commission

--Region IIIRegion IIILisle, IllinoisLisle, IllinoisMarch 14 , 2006March 14, 2006 www.nrc.govMeeting Agenda

• • Introduction and Meeting PurposeIntroduction and Meeting Purpose

• • Overview of Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL)Overview of Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL)

• • Overview of CAL Inspection ActivitiesOverview of CAL Inspection Activities

• • IP 95002 Issues Implementation Review IP 95002 Issues Implementation Review

--Inspection Scope Inspection Scope and Resultsand Results

• • Corrective Action Program Effectiveness Implementation Corrective Action Program Effectiveness Implementation Review Review --Inspection Scope and Results Inspection Scope and Results

• • Licensee Response and RemarksLicensee Response and Remarks<Break><Break>**Public Comments and Questions of NRCPublic Comments and Questions of NRC www.nrc.govPurpose of Today's MeetingProvide a public forum for the discussion of recent Provide a public forum for the discussion of recent Perry Nuclear Power Plant performancePerry Nuclear Power Plant performanceNRC to discuss the results of our review of the NRC to discuss the results of our review of the implementation of actions to address issues in the implementation of actions to address issues in the areas of IP 95002 Issues and Corrective Action areas of IP 95002 Issues and Corrective Action Program Effectiveness of Program Effectiveness of NRC'sNRC's CAL CALLicensee management will be given the opportunity Licensee management will be given the opportunity to respond to the information presentedto respond to the information presented www.nrc.govReview of Perry Performance

• • August 2004 August 2004

--Perry enters Multiple/Repetitive Perry enters Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone of NRC Action MatrixDegraded Cornerstone of NRC Action Matrix

• • JanuaryJanuary--May 2005 May 2005 --IP 95003 Inspection ConductedIP 95003 Inspection Conducted

• • May 2005 May 2005 --Public Exit Meeting for IP 95003Public Exit Meeting for IP 95003

• • July 2005 July 2005

--IP 95003 Inspection Report IssuedIP 95003 Inspection Report Issued

• • August 2005 August 2005

--FENOC Response to IP 95003 IssuesFENOC Response to IP 95003 Issues

• • September 2005 September 2005

--NRC Issues CALNRC Issues CAL

• • November 2005 November 2005

--NRC Reviews Revised PIINRC Reviews Revised PII www.nrc.govConfirmatory Action Letter (CAL)FENOC Committed to Sustained ImprovementFENOC Committed to Sustained ImprovementCorrective Action Program EffectivenessCorrective Action Program EffectivenessHuman PerformanceHuman PerformanceEmergency PreparednessEmergency PreparednessInspection Procedure 95002 IssuesInspection Procedure 95002 Issues www.nrc.govPerry CAL Inspection ActivitiesPlanned NRC Inspection Activities:Planned NRC Inspection Activities:

• • Review Licensee's Assessment Activities and Review Licensee's Assessment Activities and Corrective Action DevelopmentCorrective Action Development

• • Review Corrective Action ImplementationReview Corrective Action Implementation

• • Review Corrective Action EffectivenessReview Corrective Action Effectiveness www.nrc.govInspection Scope -IP 95002 Issues Implementation ReviewIP 95002 Issues Implementation Review IP 95002 Issues Implementation Review

--Scope Scope**Determine if actions to address maintenance Determine if actions to address maintenance procedure issues were adequately implementedprocedure issues were adequately implemented

• • Determine if actions to address ESW pump coupling Determine if actions to address ESW pump coupling assembly concerns were adequately implementedassembly concerns were adequately implemented

• • Determine if actions to address training issues were Determine if actions to address training issues were adequately implementedadequately implemented www.nrc.govInspection Results -IP 95002 Issues Implementation ReviewIP 95002 Issues Implementation Review IP 95002 Issues Implementation Review

--ResultsResults**All Commitments and Action Items reviewed All Commitments and Action Items reviewed determined to be adequately implementeddetermined to be adequately implemented

• • Maintenance Procedure improvements notedMaintenance Procedure improvements noted

• • Some Observations of Areas for ImprovementSome Observations of Areas for ImprovementTechnical Accuracy of Maintenance ProceduresTechnical Accuracy of Maintenance ProceduresIdentification of "Critical" Procedure StepsIdentification of "Critical" Procedure StepsUse of N/A's in Procedures Use of N/A's in Procedures www.nrc.govInspection Results -IP 95002 Issues Implementation ReviewIP 95002 Issues Implementation Review IP 95002 Issues Implementation Review

--ResultsResults**CAL CAL Followup FollowupInspection to review overall Inspection to review overall effectiveness effectiveness

--July 2006July 2006**Two Green findings identified associated with human Two Green findings identified associated with human performance errors during maintenanceperformance errors during maintenance www.nrc.govInspection Scope -CAP Effectiveness Implementation ReviewCAP Effectiveness Implementation CAP Effectiveness Implementation

--Scope Scope**Improve Ownership and Station FocusImprove Ownership and Station Focus

• • Improve Ability to SelfImprove Ability to Self

--Identify ProblemsIdentify Problems

• • Focus on Proper Prioritization of ProblemsFocus on Proper Prioritization of Problems

• • Improve Quality of EvaluationsImprove Quality of Evaluations

• • Improve Ability to Correct ProblemsImprove Ability to Correct Problems www.nrc.govInspection Scope -CAP Effectiveness Implementation ReviewCAP Effectiveness Implementation CAP Effectiveness Implementation

--Scope Scope**Improve CAP Closure DocumentationImprove CAP Closure Documentation

• • Improve Oversight of CAPImprove Oversight of CAP

• • Review PII Phase 1 Carryover ActivitiesReview PII Phase 1 Carryover Activities

• • Review Validated/Closed Phase 1 PII ItemsReview Validated/Closed Phase 1 PII Items

• • Review Key Performance IndicatorsReview Key Performance Indicators www.nrc.govInspection Results -CAP Effectiveness Implementation ReviewCAP Effectiveness Implementation CAP Effectiveness Implementation

--Results Results**No Findings identifiedNo Findings identified

• • All 3 CAP All 3 CAP--related Commitments adequately related Commitments adequately implementedimplemented

• • 3 of 31 Action Items not adequately 3 of 31 Action Items not adequately implementedimplemented www.nrc.govInspection Results -CAP Effectiveness Implementation ReviewCAP Effectiveness Implementation CAP Effectiveness Implementation

--Results Results**Cases where lack of process may hinder Cases where lack of process may hinder effectivenesseffectiveness

• • Significant personal commitment required to Significant personal commitment required to accomplish actionsaccomplish actions

• • CAL CAL Followup FollowupInspection to review overall Inspection to review overall effectiveness effectiveness

--November 2006November 2006 www.nrc.gov SummaryPerry is Being Operated SafelyPerry is Being Operated Safely Challenge Areas Challenge Areas

: --Corrective Action Program ImplementationCorrective Action Program Implementation

--Human PerformanceHuman PerformanceContinued Supplementary OversightContinued Supplementary Oversight www.nrc.govLicensee Response and Remarks FENOC www.nrc.govPerry Nuclear Power Plant Upcoming NRC ActivitiesCorrective Action Implementation ReviewsCorrective Action Implementation ReviewsIP 95002 Issues Implementation Review (Complete)IP 95002 Issues Implementation Review (Complete)Corrective Action Program Effectiveness Corrective Action Program Effectiveness Implementation Review (Complete)Implementation Review (Complete)Emergency Preparedness Implementation and Emergency Preparedness Implementation and Effectiveness Review Effectiveness Review

--April 2006April 2006Human Performance Implementation Review Human Performance Implementation Review

--June June 20062006 www.nrc.gov Contacts for Additional InformationRegional Public Affairs OfficerRegional Public Affairs Officer

• • Jan Strasma or Viktoria MitlyngJan Strasma or Viktoria Mitlyng

• • Phone: (630) 829Phone: (630) 829

--9663 or (630) 8299663 or (630) 829

--96629662Perry Resident Inspector OfficePerry Resident Inspector Office

• • Ray Powell, Senior Resident InspectorRay Powell, Senior Resident Inspector

• • Mark Franke, Resident InspectorMark Franke, Resident Inspector

• • Phone: (440) 259Phone: (440) 259

--36103610 www.nrc.govReference SourcesReactor Oversight ProcessReactor Oversight Processhttp://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.htmlhttp://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.htmlPublic Electronic Reading RoomPublic Electronic Reading Roomhttp://www.nrc.gov/readinghttp://www.nrc.gov/reading

--rm.htmlrm.htmlPublic Document RoomPublic Document Room1 1--800 800--397 397--4209 (Toll Free)4209 (Toll Free) www.nrc.gov SummaryPerry is Being Operated SafelyPerry is Being Operated Safely Challenge Areas Challenge Areas

: --Corrective Action Program ImplementationCorrective Action Program Implementation

--Human PerformanceHuman PerformanceContinued Supplementary OversightContinued Supplementary Oversight