ML13281A530

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Meeting Slide for FENOC - NRC Pre-Submittal Meeting Request for Licensing Action
ML13281A530
Person / Time
Site: Perry 
(NPF-058)
Issue date: 10/15/2013
From:
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To: Ellen Brown
Plant Licensing Branch III
Brown E
References
Download: ML13281A530 (15)


Text

FENOC - NRC Pre-Submittal Meeting Request for Licensing Action October 15, 2013 Perry Nuclear Power Plant

2 FENOC Representatives

Doug Reeves, Director - Site Engineering

Robb Borland, Director - Nuclear Fuel & Analysis

Ben Huck, Manager - Design Engineering

Tom Lentz, Manager - Fleet Licensing

Paul Gilles, Supervisor - Core Design

Phil Lashley, Supervisor - Fleet Licensing

Al Widmer, Nuclear Engineering Analysis

Brad Ferrell, Licensing Engineer

Nicole Schlichting, Core Design Engineer

Tom Tomlinson, Project Manager

Marvin Morris, Enercon

3 Requested Licensing Action Proposed Licensing Action Scope

Full implementation of alternative accident source term (AST) for PNPP design basis accident analyses, using RADTRAD and GNF2 fuel source term

Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR) changes included for NRC review/approval

One Technical Specification change (I-131)

Requested for spring 2015 refueling outage

4 Current Design Basis Accident Analysis

Amendment 103 (March 1999) was a pilot plant application of an alternative AST for a Loss Of Coolant Accident (LOCA)

Amendment 112 (June 2000 power uprate) looked at four of the design basis events, and scaled prior dose calculation results in order to bound the uprate

Amendment 122 (March 2003) analyzed the Fuel Handling Accident using an alternative AST and RADTRAD

5 Regulatory Requirement Governing Submittal

10 CFR 50.59 requires reviews of changes including items such as departures from a method of evaluation previously used in the safety analyses

10 CFR 50.67(b)(1) requires licensees who seek to revise their current accident source term in design basis radiological consequence analyses to apply for a license amendment per 10 CFR 50.90, including an evaluation of the consequences of applicable design basis accidents previously analyzed in the safety analysis report

6 LOCA Calculation

Polestar Applied Technology methodology is replaced with RADTRAD

Current core source term is updated for GNF2

Expanded guidance in Regulatory Guide 1.183 is used

7 LOCA Calculation Results Location Current Analysis (rem TEDE)

Revised Analysis (rem TEDE)

Acceptance Criteria (rem TEDE)

EAB 21.2 21.2 25 LPZ 10.1 6.5 25 Control Room 4.3 2.8 5

8 LOCA Dose Calculation Key Input Changes

Isotopes

Gap Release

Pressure Reduction at 24 Hours

Control Room Filtration

Aerosol Removal in Containment

Dose Conversion Factors

Containment Spray Initiation

9 Control Rod Drop Accident Calculation Revised calculation uses Regulatory Guide 1.183 Revised calculation uses RADTRAD TID 14844 source term is updated to GNF2 source term Current TID 14844 whole body and thyroid doses converted to a TEDE dose for comparison purposes on next slide

10 CRDA Calculation Results Location Converted TEDE Dose (rem)

Revised Analysis (rem TEDE)

Acceptance Criteria (rem TEDE)

EAB 0.07206 0.161 6.3 LPZ 0.3896 0.162 6.3 Control Room Not Previously Required 0.263 5

11 Main Steam Line Break Calculation

Current TID 14844 source term is updated to Regulatory Guide 1.183 source term

Revised calculation uses Regulatory Guide 1.183

Revised calculation uses RADTRAD

Current TID 14844 whole body and thyroid dose converted to TEDE dose for comparison

12 MSLB OC Calculation Results (4 Ci/g)

Location Converted TEDE Dose (rem)

Revised Analysis (rem TEDE)

Acceptance Criteria (rem TEDE)

EAB 3.597 1.17 25 LPZ 0.458 0.131 25 Control Room Not Previously Required 0.622 5

13 Dose Calculation Results Summary

All revised calculations conform to the methodology in Regulatory Guide 1.183, including the use of RADTRAD

All calculated doses meet Regulatory Guide 1.183 acceptance criteria

No calculated doses increase by more than 10% of the margin to the regulatory limit

14 Regulatory Evaluation

10 CFR 50.90 application submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59 and 10 CFR 50.67

No significant hazards

No change to the site Environmental Plan

No impact on the environment

15 Requested Licensing Action Next Steps:

Submittal planned for November 2013

NRC review requested to support spring 2015 refueling outage